Corrupt university, journal, fake news

Top
Next

Brain research stalls.

[ Brain disease is incurable due to useless science. ]

(B-1)  ↓ Old technology, No progress in  

All brain diseases, dementia, Parkinson, ALS are devastating.
Still No cure for those diseases, the causes of which are unknown.

Those serious brain diseases impose a tremendous burden not only on patients but also on their family, worsening their quality of life.

Drug treatments are often ineffective.  In these cases, primitive electrical brain stimulation, which is a 200-year-old technique, is still used as the current treatment.

Magnetic resonance imaging (= MRI) is also an old technique, which basic mechanism made No progress for 40 years, still accepeted as the leading technology in the present medical research and examination.

MRI takes an enormous time to watch tissues with low resolution of millimeter by which MRI cannot observe each cell (= micrometer ), let alone much smaller protein or molecule.

For 30 years, humans have already been able to observe and manipulate each single atom and molecule using atomic force microscope.

There is No viable theory bridging the gap between these two devices.

Our ability to manipulate the smallest atom means we should be able to manipulate bigger proteins, construct nano-machine and cure deadly diseases now.

But all diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer, HIV and diabetes are still incurable despite a great deal of time and money wasted in these researches and clinical trials.

What's wrong with that ?  Quantum mechanics has been the only theory for explaining atomic and molecular behaviors for 100 years, and it's been unchanged since its foundation despite its weirdness.

If quantum mechanics was really successful in describing atomic interaction perfectly, we could have already clarified all mechanisms of human body at the atomic level and cured all diseases by now.

But we cannot.  It means there is some "insuperable barrier" between applied medicine and basic quantum physics which is full of fantasies such as parallel worlds, extradimensions, time-travel, quasiparticle and a dead and alive cat.

This useless basic physics caused "scientists" to fabricate fake applied science such as climate change and artificial intelligence (= AI ), which is just a political tool to get taxpayers' money exploiting illusory 'China threat'.

AI is just a scam going nowhere, created by greedy academia and corporations as seen in a recent Tesla's fiasco.

Self-driving car replacing human brain is just a pipe dream, seeing that AI professors are wrapped up in applying "machine-learning" to fictional parallel worlds and extradimensions.

While record-breaking cold weather is causing actual damage now, global-warming scientists and university had no choice but to resort to violence to get public attention, setting up teenage Greta as their icon.

It is sad that a 40-year-old MRI is still the most "leading-edge" technology both in hospitals and medical research even now.

MRI can get only the rough tissue image with resolution of 1 mm at best, which cannot observe each cell or protein at all.

So as long as this MRI is the most "cutting-edge" technology now, clarifying mysterious brain function at the molecular level and applying it to curing diseases are impossible.

fMRI technology, which is the most often seen in the latest brain research, also uses the same old MRI machine which basic principle has Not changed for 40 years.  ← Science stops progressing.

Another new technique called magnetic resonance elastography (= MRE ) just combines old MRI with classical mechanical vibration.  ← Nothing changed.

So humans' technology for watching brain activity has substantially made No progress since MRI was first introduced 40 years ago.

MRI is said to measure nuclear 'spin'.  But correctly speaking, seeing 'spin' itself is impossible.  All we can measure is the "magnetic field" of atom or molecule.

Quantum mechanics cannot treat 'electron spin' as real rotation, because a tiny electron must spin faster-than-light to generate observed magnetic field, while a heavier and bigger nucleus can actually spin.

MRI measures not spin itself but its slower precession based on classical mechanics.  This ( water ) nuclear precessions absorb or emit different radio electromagnetic waves depending on different surrounding tissues, which difference is detected as MRI image.

As I said, MRI images just get and distinguish the "entire tissue".  Distinguishing smaller cell or protein is impossible, so completely helpless in knowing the precise mechanism of brain's neural network.

Recently, new technology called "optogenetics" is gaining attention as minimally-invasive method for brain research and treatment, though still impractical.

This optogenetics is very barbaric, dangerous and far from a reality.
Microbes such as green algae have special light-sensitive proteins.

Researchers take the gene encoding these proteins from algae and transfer the microbial gene into animal or human's neuron cell's genome with the help of viruses.

Animal or human neuron cells infected with viruses with spooky algae light-sensitive ion-channel protein are activated on and off illuminated by light.

These viruses carrying algae gene must be injected into target cells inside brain directly by surgery.  Furthermore an optical cable emitting light also must be inserted into brain and left there forever.  ← very invasive and inconvenient method.

There is No guarantee that these algae proteins will work normally also in human brains, and these foreign algae proteins are very likely to be rejected by human immune system.

Transfer of algae gene to virus DNA is conducted using and trusting natural bacterial enzymes and viruses.

All these algae proteins and bacterial enzymes for gene engineering must be found and obtained from the nature.  Humans cannot design or construct these proteins from scratch artificially.

Useless quantum mechanics prevents biologists from manipulating or designing proteins for treatment.  Unless biologists find lucky enzymes or proteins from the natural microbes, there's nothing they can do.

So the current molecular biotechnology dealing with DNA and RNA has developed independently of useless basic quantum physics.

In other words, the current medical research which cannot utilize each atomic or molecular interaction can never cure complicated diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer.

Basic quantum mechanics is completely helpless in explaining medicine and proteins, then how about simpler-structured metal and crystal ?

Surprisingly, so-called "successful" quantum mechanics fails to explain even those simple-structured materials using real particles.

Quantum physics has to rely on fictitious quasiparticles with unreal mass and charge to describe all materials such as crystal, semiconductor, superconductor, solar cells and quantum biology.

Different from the media-hype and fake news, quantum physics discarding real particle picture can only describe each electron and particle as nonphysical math symbol with No physical figure.

The fact that even simple-structured metal and crystal cannot be explained by quantum physics realistically without quasiparticles means it's much more impossible to apply quantum mechanics to complicated human body and proteins.

Humans already have excellent technology of manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope.  But we don't have realistic "theory" to move forward to the next stage to manipulate multiple atoms or proteins.

For interpreting atomic force in microscopy, all physicists blindly use density functional theory (= DFT ), which is very rough and unreliable approximation of Schrödinger equation and cannot express "force".

DFT approximately treats the whole metal as fake "one-electron", because multi-electron Schrödinger equation is unrealistic and too complicated to calculate ( this p.12, this p.6 ).

Like Schrödinger equation which cannot solve multi-eletron atoms, DFT cannot solve any atoms, it only gives fake energy (= cannot calculate real "force" ).

You have to choose arbitrary fake trial wavefunction called basis set and fake unknown pseudo-potential called exchange-correlation functional, then just integrate it to get fake energy without force ( this p.28 ).

Without knowing "force", we cannot know or predict "in which direction" each atom or electron will move by forces of other particles in chemical reactions.

"Energy" has No direction, so only calculating energy is not enough to tell us "in which direction" each atom will move.  Energy without real force in quantum mechanics is just fiction, meaningless.

Guessing and choosing convenient wavefunction means quantum mechanical method is a kind of " art" which cannot predict any new physical values, so completely useless in applied science.

Each time chosen fake potential (= exchange functional ) fails, you have to choose other fake potential out of infinite choices ( this p.49, this p.17 ) meaninglessly in DFT method.

So as long as we rely on this unscientific method of quantum mechanics and its false approximation DFT, we can never explain protein in a practical way or cure diseases even if we can manipulate a single atom now.

Realistic atomic model using real forces and moving electrons is necessary for medical researchers and biologists to utilize atomic behavior for clarifying human body.

Unfortunately, in 1920s when quantum mechanics was born, there were No modern computers to calculate three-body helium atom using realistic atomic model, which is why physicists at that time had no choice but to accept unreal quantum mechanics reluctantly.

We prove Schrödinger equation is false in multi-electron atoms, because its helium must split into "three independent unreal hydorgens" to satisfy total energy conservation.

And Pauli exclusion principle proves to be false, too, because its nonphysical exchange energy difference between symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions disappears when the total energy is conserved.

So quantum mechanics is not only physically unrealistic but also mathematically proved to be wrong.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Stem cell research has No future.

[ Fantasy 'science' deprives patients of a chance to cure disease. ]

(S-1)  ↓ iPS cell is useless forever due to  

Regenerative medicine replacing old diseased organs with young, brand-new ones is a human's dream.

Patients waiting for organ transplants are increasing.  Even after transplant, there are still risks of organ failure and serious side effects by immunosuppressive drugs which must be taken for the rest of their life.

Regenerating new organs from stem cells is gaining attention as a promising future cure.  But stem cells can be obtained only from the embryonic stage, Not from adult tissues.

Human iPS (= induced pluripotent stem ) cell is expected to generate any new organs from adult cells.  ← iPS can be a panacea ?  No.

10 years after their discovery, the stem cell therapy has failed to show a clear clinical benefit.  iPS cells have a high risk of causing cancer originating from their inducing genes.

What's wrong with that ?  Why cannot we develop stem cell technology to the level of curing diseases ?

All living things are composed of proteins and molecules.  So a full understanding of molecular mechanism will surely enable us to control any diseases.

For 100 years, Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics has been the only method of explaining atomic and molecular interactions.

But still nobody understands weird quantum physics full of fantasy such as parallel worlds, extra-dimensions and illusory time.

If quantum mechanics was really "successful", humans should have already overcome various diseases such as diabetes, HIV, cancer and Alzheimer.  But we cannot cure any of these.

It proves the current basic science = quantum mechanics is wrong.
Despite this obvious fact, academia still tries to force this useless science on students.

Students easily fall prey to greedy educational industry which brainwashes children by science fiction including time-travel wormhole, multiverse shape and global warming as seen in recent Italy government.

'Scientists' urge all students to imitate Greta Thunberg, blindly believe their pseudo-science and ignore the fact that fake global warming doesn't cause rising sea and record-cold weather is hitting the world.

How is the current stem cell and iPS research being conducted ?
First of all, the current medical research has nothing to do with unreal quantum mechanics.

Biological technology has developed independently of the useless basic physics (= quantum mechanics ) which prevents biologists from utilizing atomic or molecular interaction in medicine.

Exact mechanism of stem cell and carcinogenesis still remains unknown.

Medical researchers still have to rely on very old and primitive methods such as blind "random screening" and "trial and error" approach where they just culture stem cells in petri dishes with various substances to see which substance may affect stem cell behavior.

This old-fashioned trial and error approach has a great risk of severe side effect, and takes an enormous amount of time and money in clinical trials.  It's like groping in the dark.

Even when time-wasting clinical trials fail with unknown side effect, there is nothing scientists can do without knowing exact molecular mechanism of diseases.  All they can do is repeat the same kind of blind searching for 'lucky' substances in cells and leave the rest to God.

IPS stem cells have been also created by this old primitive method of "random screening" and "trial and error", which is why iPS is still useless with No future.

Creation of iPS cells is simple.  Researchers just transduce some four growth-related genes into adult skin cells in petri dishes with the help of viruses and wait until the skin cells may change into iPS stem cells.

How did they find these four specific genes which expression could generate iPS cells ?

First, researchers chose some 24 potential candidate genes based on their past experience, then inserted those genes into somatic cells randomly by viruses, and finally found four genes of them might be related to generating iPS cells ( this p.5 ).

This whole process to induce iPS stem cells has nothing to do with quantum mechanics.  Biologists don't care about "atoms" or molecules at all.

How did they introduce these four genes into virus DNA ?
Biologists just utilized "natural ability" of bacterial enzymes and virus to insert genes into other cells.

So unless useful bacterial enzymes are luckily available from the nature, there's nothing we can do.  Humans cannot design or construct arbitrary proteins from scratch.

After isolating RNA or DNA from some cells, they amplified only specific genes using bacterial enzyme polymerase following the method called PCR.

Then, they cut this amplified DNA and virus DNA ( called vector or plasmid living inside bacteria ) with the same bacterial restriction enzymes so that both DNA ends are dovetailed and reconnected with each other by other bacterial enzyme ligase.

When this circular virus DNA encoding genes of interest and other DNA encoding viral proteins are mixed and incubated with cells, it easily produces many viruses carrying desired genes which can infect target cells to generate iPS cells.

All these processes of gene transfer and virus replication depend on the "natural ability" inherent in cells and viruses.  Humans are helpless, can do nothing except trust their ability and pray to God after mixing ingredients in container.

Useless quantum mechanics keep biologists from advancing to the stage of manipulating proteins and molecules to control diseases.

Biologists cannot directly watch or control each protein in cells.
There are only two old options to investigate proteins: using time-consuming gene knockout mouse or antibody gotten from vaccinated animals.

Humans already have technology of watching and manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope.

The ability to manipulate the smallest atom means we should be able to manipulate bigger proteins or enzymes easily to treat diseases.  But 100-year-old quantum mechanical 'theory' prevents us from applying this excellent 'technology' to actual medicine.

Quantum mechanics has fatal defects.  We need "force" to move and construct something.  Of course, when we want to move each atom and construct a molecular nano-machine, understanding and defining actual atomic "force" are necessary.

But surprisingly quantum mechanics cannot utilize this "force" in Schrödinger equation which can only give "fake energy" by integrating approximate "fake" wavefunction, though humans already have tools to measure precise atomic force.  ← this contradiction makes quantum mechanics useless forever.

Bohr model using real Coulomb force and de Broglie wave agreed with experimental results and Schrödinger's hydrogen which also exploited the same principle of de Broglie wave and Coulomb energy.

Observed electron's de Broglie wave and light interference actually showed the space filled with some "medium" which affects atomic orbits and quantized energies in a reasonable way.

But this realistic atomic model faced insurmountable obstacle in the early 20th century when there were No modern computers to calculate an actual three-body helium atom.

So physicists had no choice but to give up this "real electron and wave" model, instead, they started to use uncertain Schrödinger equation as a stopgap approximate method together with another unrealistic theory proposed by Einstein lacking space medium.

The problem of Schrödinger equation is its wavefunction cannot clearly distinguish between a moving electron and its de Broglie wave around it.  It just mixes them as one vague electron cloud spreading all over space.

Without defining real particles, waves and medium, quantum mechanics needs fantasy parallel worlds to interpret two-slit interference and makes all forces virtual.

Only solvable one-electron hydrogen atom is OK in this uncertain quantum electron cloud model. In all other multi-electron atoms and molecules which cannot be solved by quantum mechanics, it is disaster.

If we can treat each electron as a realistic "moving particle" through some medium causing de Broglie wave, we can easily find the most stable electrons' state (= the lowest energy ) where electrons are just avoiding each other on the opposite sides of nuclei.

Quantum mechanical vague electron cloud model cannot even do this simple electrons' motion of 'avoiding', which is why quantum mechanics is impossible to be applied to practical molecular biology.

Even if we can measure precise atomic force using atomic force microscopy, this quantum electron cloud cannot avoid other electrons' clouds, because they must spread over all space.  So the concept of "force" is meaningless in quantum mechanics, even if atomic "force" can be precisely measured.

In unsolvable multi-electron atoms or molecules, all quantum mechanics can do is just choose fake (= approximate ) trial wavefunction called basis set, and integrate it to get fake total energy instead of solving it.

The goal is to find the most stable (= the lowest energy ) electrons' state (= trial wavefunction ).  But these is No limitation in the form of this trial wavefunctions which can take arbitrary forms.

It means you have to choose infinite kinds of (fake) trial wavefunctions out of infinite choices endlessly, compare them and find the lowest-energy one among them, which takes infinite time if you really try to do it, so impossible ( this p.12 ).

So basically, when you guess and luckily find the convenient trial wavefunction which seems to give energy values close to experimental results, you should deliberately stop calculating it.  This 'artificial' quantum mechanical method is very dishonest, and a kind of "art" rather than science.

Just "choosing" fake solution until you find "desirable results" shows this quantum mechanical method has No ability to predict any new physical values, so completely useless just wasting an enormous amount of time meaninglessly.

Not only Coulomb force but also Pauli repulsion is necessary to explain atomic behavior.  But quantum mechanics does Not admit Pauli exclusion force to be a real force.

Strangely, there is No physical interpretation or force carrier for quantum Pauli principle which is supposed to have only nonphysical exchange "energy" without force ( this p.6 ).  ← unbelievable.

Without real "force", we cannot move anything including atoms or proteins inside human body to cure diseases !

If we can adopt a realistic atomic model which can deal with "force", the most stable (= the lowest-energy ) electrons' state can be easily found, as I said.

Because the "force" tells us "in which direction" each electron will be pulled or pushed by other particles in chemical reaction, until they move and settle down to the lowest energy stable state.

On the other hand, the "energy" has No "direction", so the energy cannot tell us in which direction each electron or atom will be moved.  We have to repeat infinite meaningless integrals of fake wavefunctions endlessly to find the lowest-energy one among them.

We prove this quantum mechanical method with unreal spin and Pauli antisymmetric wavefunction is self-contradictory, so false in multi-electron atoms.

This useless quantum mechanics has to rely on fictitious quasiparticles with fake mass, charge and DFT (= more rough and unreliable approximation of Schrödinger equation with fake potential ) to describe all materials such as semiconductor and quantum biology

The fact that even simple-structured metal and crystals have to rely on fictitious quasiparticles to describe various physical phenomena means it is much more impossible to describe more complicated proteins inside human body realistically by quantum mechanics.

It is urgent to replace this old useless quantum mechanical model with new practical atomic model to manipulate proteins and construct nano-machines which surely lead to curing diseases.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Diabetes  ← No cure,  insulin forever.

[ Unreal quantum physics prevents curing diseases. ]

(D-1)  ↓ Only old, primitive treatment is left for medicine,  

Nearly 400 million people worldwide are suffereing from diabetes, and the number of patients is increasing rapidly.

Diabetes causes serious complications such as blindness, limb-amputation and kidney failure.

There is No cure for diabetes.  Even type 2 diabetes eventually has to take insulin injections to control blood sugar levels.

Once you start insulin injections, you have to continue this treatment for the rest of your life, which worsens your quality of life.  Demand for insulin is growing rapidly.

Despite long-time research, the exact cause of diabetes is still unknown, which keeps diabetes incurable forever like other deadly diseases such as HIV, cancer and Alzheimer.

Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics has been the only method of dealing with atomic and molecular behavior for 100 years.

If quantum mechanics, Schrödinger equation was really successful in predicting atomic behavior, we should have already elucidated all mechanisms of human body at the atomic level, and cured all deadly diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer.  But we still cannot.

It means the current basic physics = quantum mechanics failed, but physicists still try to utilize it in vain with fictitious particles.

Quantum mechanics is fantasy, claiming each particle can be in multiple places at once like a ghost  dead and alive cat in parallel worlds.

Scientists still don't understand wacky quantum mechanics which can only give useless, nonphysical wavefunction with No physical picture, cannot explain even two-electron helium easily.

This useless basic science caused fictional global warming and Greta Thunberg who blindly believes "scientists" while the world suffers the record-breaking cold weather.

Academia and Greta try to exploit these pseudo-science as "money-making tool" for selling books and political correctness to get taxpayers' money ?

There is only old and primitive treatment for curing diabetes completely.  This is transplantation of pancreatic tissue and cells into patients.

But patients with transplants must take immunosuppressive drugs for the rest of their life which can cause serious side effects.  Transplanted islet cells are easily rejected and destroyed by body immune system, sooner or later.  So still ineffective.

The latest researches focus on generating artificial insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells from pluripotent stem cells.  But even this latest technology is still based on old-fashioned and primitive method.

Researchers just place stem cells in petri dishes, put many different substances and growth factors into them for "random screening", and wait until some of them differentiate into pancreatic cells.

All researchers can do is "wait and see", leaving the rest to God, praying that some stem cells will grow into desired insulin-producing cells.

Because the mechanism of stem cells and diabetes is still unclear, which proves the basic quantum physics dealing with molecular mechanism is completely useless in medicine and drug research.

This is why all actual biologists and medical researchers still ignore fantasy quantum mechanics.

For example, this latest research tried to randomly screen more than 100000 substances for potential diabetic drugs which could multiply insulin-producing beta cells.  This is also a very primitive way taking an enormous amount of time, praying to God.

They still don't know the way to specifically multiply only insulin-producing beta cells, so there is a risk of causing cancer from other irrelevant cells ( this latter ).

Another latest research claims they succeeded in transplanting artificially cultured human beta cells into healthy mice and confirming their produding insulin inside mice.

But the long term result is still unclear.  And they used "non-diabetic, immunodeficient mice" as recipients of beta cells.

So it is still unclear whether these artificial beta cells can produce enough insulin compensating for diabetic pancreatic cells.

Different from immunodeficient mice, human's immune system easily reject these artificial beta cells as foreign.  So patients must take immunosuppressive drug for the rest of their life ( this latter ), which is very likely to fail especially in type-1 diabetes wich is auto-immune diseases.

Biologists just cultured stem cells in various conditions, praying that some of them will differentiate into insulin-producing cell they desire.

Of course, quantum mechanics has nothing to do with any of these procedures.  Biologists don't care about electrons or atoms at all.

This old-fashioned "trial and error" approach without understanding underlying exact molecular mechanism is risky and takes an enormous amount of time and money, even if they could luckily proceed to clinical trials.

If their clinical trials fail with severe unknown side effects, researchers are helpless, can do nothing about it without knowing precise molecular mechanism of diseases.

All these problems originate from useless basic physics = quantum mechanics which has been unchanged for 100 years since its foundation, and dominated the academic world like geocentric theory in Galileo era.

Can humans observe molecular and proteins's functions directly inside cells to clarify how diseases develop, which leads to curing diseases ?  Answer is yes.
More precisely, humans already have 'technology' to realize it, but have No useful 'theory' to implement it.

Using atomic force microsope, humans can observe and manipulate each single atom as they like, which means we can construct any nano-machines and artificial proteins from scratch to cure diseases using this technology.

To predict bigger proteins, we need to adopt as simple and practical atomic model as possible.  The number of valence electrons of an atom is usually less than 10, so the current modern computer is enough to calculate any big proteins.

The problem is old quantum mechanics cannot use this simple, realistic atomic model.  An electron of quantum mechanics must always spread over all space as vague electron cloud.

Because quantum mechanics cannot distinguish between an electron and its de Broglie wave.  It just mixes both of them into one weird wavefunction.

Only solvable one-electron hydrogen atom is OK in this uncertain quantum electron cloud model.  In all other multi-electron atoms and molecules, quantum mechanics is disaster.

If we can treat each electron as a realistic "moving particle" through some medium causing de Broglie wave interference, we can easily find the most stable electrons' state (= the lowest energy ) where electrons are just avoiding each other on the opposite sides of nuclei.

Quantum mechanical vague electron cloud model cannot even do this simple electrons' motion of 'avoiding', which is why quantum mechanics is impossible to be applied to practical molecular biology.

Even if we can measure precise atomic force using atomic force microscopy, this quantum electron cloud cannot avoid other electrons' clouds, because they must spread over all space.  So the concept of "force" is meaningless in quantum mechanics, even if atomic "force" can be precisely measured.

In unsolvable multi-electron atoms or molecules, all quantum mechanics can do is just choose fake (= approximate ) trial wavefunction called basis set, and integrate it to get fake total energy instead of solving it.

The goal is to find the most stable (= the lowest energy ) electrons' state (= trial wavefunction ).  But these is No limitation in the form of this trial wavefunctions which can take arbitrary forms.

It means you have to choose infinite kinds of (fake) trial wavefunctions out of infinite choices endlessly, compare them and find the lowest-energy one among them, which takes infinite time if you really try to do it, so impossible ( this p.13 ).

So basically, when you guess and luckily find the convenient trial wavefunction which seems to give energy values close to experimental results, you should deliberately stop calculating it.  This 'artificial' quantum mechanical method is very dishonest, and a kind of "art" rather than science.

Just "choosing" fake solution until you find "desirable results" shows this quantum mechanical method has No ability to predict any new physical values, so completely useless just wasting an enormous amount of time meaninglessly.

Not only Coulomb force but also Pauli repulsion is necessary to explain atomic behavior.  But quantum mechanics does Not admit Pauli exclusion force to be a real force.

Strangely, there is No physical interpretation or force carrier in quantum Pauli principle which is supposed to have only nonphysical exchange "energy" without force ( this p.6 ).  ← unbelievable.

Without real "force", we cannot move anything including atoms or proteins inside human body to cure diseases !

If we can adopt a realistic atomic model which can deal with "force", the most stable (= the lowest-energy ) electrons' state can be easily found, as I said.

Because the "force" tells us "in which direction" each electron will be pulled or pushed by other particles in chemical reaction, until they move and settle down to the lowest energy stable state.

On the other hand, the "energy" has No "direction", so the energy cannot tell us in which direction each electron or atom will be moved.  We have to repeat infinite meaningless integrals of fake wavefunctions endlessly to find the lowest-energy one among them.

In solids consisting of many atoms, even this integral of fake wavefunctions is impossible.  So physicists started to use more rough and dishonest Schrödinger approximation called density functional theory (= DFT ) which treats the whole solid as "one big fake electron".

In compensation for one-electron approximation, DFT has to use fake pseudo-potential called "exchange-correlation functional" which form is unknown and you can choose any form of this pseudo-potential freely.

You have to choose different exchange-correlation functionals in different physical situations, so DFT method of just choosing artificial fake wavefunction and pseudopotential is also useless with No ability to predict anything ( this p.17 ).

This useless quantum mechanics has to rely on fictitious quasiparticles with fake mass, charge and DFT method to describe all materials such as semiconductor and quantum biology, which cannot be utilized in actual medicine or treatment of diseases.  Nonsense physics.

Physicists had no choice but to accept unreal quantum mechanics reluctantly when there were No modern computers to calculate real moving electrons in old 1920s.

Wacky quantum mechanics should have been a temporary, stopgap atomic model until humans could start to use modern computers and more realistic atomic model replaces it.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

HIV is incurable forever.

[ As long as quantum physics is used in basic science. ]

(Q-1)  ↓ Molecular mechanism of HIV is unknown.  

About 40 million people are infected with HIV or AIDS worldwide.  The number of the patients is increasing every year, and about 1 million people still die of HIV-related disease now.

HIV is one of the most serious diseases and public health concerns.

There is No cure for HIV.  Once you get HIV, you have to take a medicine for the rest of your life.

The moment you stop drugs, HIV viruses start to multiply and destroy your immune system, and you will die from infection.

There are still severe side effects such as drug-resistant HIV, because the virus gene is prone to mutation.

Why is HIV incurable ?
HIV is an exogenous virus using enzymes which don't exist in humans.

So drugs inhibiting these virus-specific enzymes can control HIV more easily than cancer and Alzheimer originating from human endogenous cells.

But HIV can invade human DNA inside resting memory T cells which can survive for more than decades silently.  There is No way to remove HIV from human DNA, which is why it is still incurable.

HIV can sneak into human DNA without destroying host cells in very sophisticated way.  Then, why can't we do the same thing as HIV virus ?  Humans are inferior to viruses ?

If we can control human DNA like HIV virus, we can cure all diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer and genetic disorder, not only HIV.  But we cannot.  Why ?

Quantum mechanics has been the only method of dealing with atomic and molecular behaviors, and unchanged since it was introduced 100 years ago.

If quantum mechanics is really successful, we should have already clarified all mechanisms inside human body at the atomic level, and cured diseases such as HIV and cancer.  But we are still far from it.

Scientists still don't understand quantum mechanics, but they never try to discard this weird physics which claims a cat can be dead and alive simultaneously in fantasy parallel worlds.

This useless quantum physics urges "scientists" to focus only on "science fiction" such as parallel worlds, extradimensions and global warming, putting curing diseases on the back burner.

Greta Thunberg who believes "scientists" has only very inconvenient option to move to Spain after the climate summit was canceled in Chile which ironically originated in expensive climate policies like France's yellow vest protests.

The world is freezing cold at the record cold temperature against so-called "scientists" whose main purpose is to get taxpayers' money by fake science and education.

There is only a dangerous and primitive approach to removing HIV from humen DNA, "stem cell transplants" which replace the whole original bone marrow cells with new blood cells from donors with a HIV-resistant mutation.

This stem cell transplant using large doses of radiation and chemotherapy is likely to cause death and severe side effects persisting for decades.  So it is applied only to patients with life-threatening leukemia or cancers.

The recent news said that the latest biotechnology called CRISPR might cure HIV in mice.  But this kind of sensational news is often misleading and should be taken with a grain of salt.

First, HIV virus cannot infect mice.
It only infects humans and chimpanzees.

Human bood cells need to be transplanted into mice with weakened immune system.  HIV infect only these "artificial human cells" which are eventually rejected as foreign by mice.

This CRISPR treatment was effective only in 5 out of 13 mice.
They checked HIV only 5 weeks after treatment, which is a very short.  Long-term effect of this treatment is unclear.

So this experiment was conducted in completely different situation from actual HIV-infected humans.

CRISPR protein and its gene-editing system were gotten from bacteria.

When foreign viruses invade bacteria, a part of the virus DNA was "memorized", inserted into the bacterial immune gene which can destroy the same viruses using CRISPR immune system when the viruses invade the bacteria again.

Using the target HIV gene as a foreign DNA to destroy, this CRISPR ( Cas ) protein could destroy HIV infecting human cell gene ?

But there are many difficult problems and unknown things in CRISPR.

This bacterial CRISPR protein is a foreign body for human, so human already has antibody against it and the human immune system could invalidate this protein and its treatment.

This CRISPR gene editing is not so precise.  It could destroy even normal human cells irrelevant to HIV infection and cause cancers.

So this treatment by destroying HIV-infected human gene by bacterial CRISPR enzyme is dangerous and impossible to apply to actual humans as it is.

We have No exact knowledge of how viruses invade human cells cleverly at the protein, molecular levels.

We cannot know how proteins interact with each other in detail or manipulate those proteins directly.  It is impossible for us to design and construct human artificial enzymes from scratch.

All biotechnology tools such as viruses, bacterial enzymes and DNA were obtained from the natural living things, which can't be designed or controlled freely by humans.

So if we try using some bacterial enzymes or viruses as gene therapy and fail with serious side effects, we have No means to know why it didn't work out.  There is nothing for us to do.  Humans are helpless.

In developing new drugs, all researchers can do is blindly repeat classical "trial and error" approach which takes a enormous amount of time and money, and could face serious side effects for which researchers can do nothing because of useless basic physics = quantum mechanics.

Adenovirus is used to carry genes encoding CRISPR proteins to the target HIV-infected cells by being injected into mice.

The first thing to do is insert gene encoding CRISPR proteins and the target HIV DNA into adenoviral gene.  These adenoviruses injected into mice will spread, produce CRISPR proteins inside mice, find target HIV-infected cells and destroy them ?

Quantum mechanics is used in this process of gene therapy ?  No.  Quantum mechanics has nothing to do with biotechnology.

The current biotechnology has been developed independently of quantum mechanics which is completely useless in all applied science such as medicine.  This is why actual biologists and medical researchers ignore quantum mechanics.

Virus DNA is called vector or plasmid.  Using bacterial enzyme called polymerase, we can amplify target HIV gene by PCR, and then insert this HIV gene into adenovirus gene vector using other bacterial cut and paste enzymes.

This procedure is simple.  Researchers just mix all ingredients such as viral DNA and bacterial enzymes in a tube or petri dish, incubate it and wait.

And then increased adenoviruses carrying CRISPR gene were injected into HIV-infected mice following protocols.

Humans are helpless.  There are No other things humans can do than simply mixing natural bacterial enzymes and viruses.

We cannot manipulate those proteins or enzymes directly due to useless quantum physics which is the only way to tell us about molecular mechanism for now.

Humans already have technology of watching and manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope, but cannot manipulate bigger proteins.  Why ?

Being able to watch and manipulate a single atom means we already have the excellent potential to clarify molecular behaviors between proteins, control enzymes directly, and cure HIV and cancer.

But the basic physics, quantum mechanics which has substantially stopped progressing for 100 years, prevents us from applying the current state-of-the-art technology to curing diseases.

Unrealistic quantum mechanics should have been a temporary, stopgap atomic theory which physicists reluctantly accepted 100 years ago when modern computers to calculate real electrons' motions were unavailable, so there were No other choices.

Schrödinger equation cannot solve any atoms or molecules except for one-electron hydrogen atom.  So they rely on very dishonest way just to choose fake approximate solution with freely adjustable parameters and integrate it instead of solving equations.

The is No limitation in the form of this fake approximate solution.  You can choose any arbitrary fake solution out of infinite choices, which takes infinite time if you really try to find the solution giving the lowest (= most stable ) energy among infinite possible choices ( this last ).

So basically, you must stop this fruitless process of choosing and integrating nonphysical Schrödinger wavefunction when you find convenient fake solution which gives energies close to experimental values.

"Choosing" convenient solution means quantum mechanics has No ability to predict any new physical values, so useless.  It is a kind of "art" rather than science.

Quantum mechanics cannot deal with each electron as a moving real particle, instead, it treats an electron as vague electron cloud spreading over all space which makes it impossible for us to use quantum mechanics in practical science such as medicine.

If we can treat each electron as a normal moving particle, we can easily find the most stable (= the lowest energy ) atomic state where electrons are just avoiding each other on the opposite sides.

But the electron cloud model of quantum mechanics cannot use this simple technique.  Quantum mechanics has to repeat meaningless, almost impossible work of just choosing and integrating fake wavefunctions as long as their fake energies can be lower.

Just calculating (fake) energies is Not enough to predict chemical reaction.  Calculating atomic "force" is necessary, because nothing can be moved without forces.

"Forces" tells us where each electrons or atoms will move in chemical reaction.  "Energies" with No direction cannot tell us in which direction each particle will be pulled or pushed in chemical reaction.

Pauli exclusion force besides Coulomb force is necessary to predict atomic motion.  But quantum mechanics cannot admit Pauli repulsive force to be a real force or identify its force carrier ( this p.6 ).

So as long as quantum mechanics is used, we cannot utilize the concept of "force", though atomic force can be actually measured.  ← This self-contradiction makes quantum mechanics unrealistic and useless.

Atomic radius is determined by de Broglie wave interference which tells us that the "medium" causing de Broglie wave can exert as strong force as Coulomb force, so it can be used as real force carrier of mysterious Pauli exclusion force.

Using practical and simple atomic model based on moving electrons and real "forces", we can surely apply it to biology and medicine and cure deadly diseases such HIV and cancer.

Quantum mechanics cannot handle even simpler metals or crystals.   It has to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge to describe all physical phenomena in solid-physics and quantum biology.

Real elementary particles inside materials are only electons and nuclei by which every physical phenomena in our daily life must be described.

The fact that physicists still have to rely on fictitious quasiparticles in condensed matter proves the current quantum mechanical model is wrong, and only explains materials as nonphysical model.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Alzheimer treatment  is hopeless.

[ Dementia is incurable forever due to fantasy physics. ]

(Q-1)  ↓ Alzheimer treatment is deadlocked ↔ fantasy  

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia.
It progressively damages a person's memory, judgement, language and independence.

The number of Alzheimer patients is growing rapidly in the aging society.
It imposes tremendous burden not only on patients but also on their family.

Despite longtime researches, it is Not known what causes Alzheimer.  There is No cure for Alzherimer's disease, nor any proven ways to prevent its onset.

100 years have already passed since the current basic physics quantum mechanics was established.  ← It proves quantum mechanics is useless in applied science and medicine.

Quantum mechanics is unrealistic, claiming a thing can exist in different places simultaneously like a dead and alive cat living in parallel universes.

Nobody understands quantum physics where each particle's motion is supposed to be uncertain.  Sadly, parallel worlds are the only option to apply quantum mechanics to something.

Physicists dream quantum computer may factor large numbers much faster than classical (= ordinary ) computer someday by performing multiple calculations simultaneously using parallel worlds.

This faster factorizing is the only way to prove quantum mechanics, its parallel worlds and usefulness of quantum computer.  But it failed.

There is No evidence of quantum speed-up so far.  Only very simple factoring in a single world (= not simultaneously ) can be done, which cannot prove quantum computer or parallel worlds.

But physicists need to keep getting taxpayers' money even for their fictional science.  So they coined the new term "supremacy" to hide the original uselessness.

This "supremacy" has nothing to do with calculation or the original goal of factoring.  It affects nothing in our daily life, just a pipe dream of imaginary future.

Google quantum computer is Not a calculator or computer.
All it can do is generate random meaningless numbers.

So people and politicians are deceived by so-called 'scientists' and fake news media which intentionally exaggerate it, saying "It could change everything such as healthcare and AI !"

Google researchers claim even the current state-of-the-art supercomputer would take 10000 years to calculate what their quantum computer has done.

But other IBM researchers say "Google's claim is a lie. They could calculate it in only 2.5 days instead of 10000 years even in the worst case."  ← very huge discrepancy.  Why ?

Because there are many different ways to generate random meaningless numbers.  Google researchers intentionally chose the most inefficient and slowest way for ordinary computer to generate random numbers.

The current ordinary computer also can generate random numbers instantly, which doesn't need as many as 10000 years, which turned out to be an overblown lie by scientists and journals.

Google quantum computer cannot generate pure random numbers.  There was some uniqueness in their randomness ( this latter ).  It's a natural thing.

Imagine a person A says some numbers randomly, and another person B tries to copy the person A's randomness, which naturally takes a little more time than the original person A.  That's what Google is doing.  Saying or generating random numbers has nothing to do with quantum supremacy.

Academia, Caltech is becoming a 'center of science fraud' together with Nature and corporations, circulating fictional black hole picture and gravitational wave, which are still useless, just wasting taxpayers' money.

The way to create fictional 'imminent threat' in the future is simlar to other science scam such as AI and global warming during the record cold temperature.

The current Alzheimer treatment and drugs are all ineffective.
It is known that some proteins such as amyloid-beta and tau increase in Alzheimer's brain.

The current therapy tries to target and destroy these proteins by very old methods such as immunization and vaccination.

But the mechanism of how these amyloid and tau proteins increase inside Alzheimer brain is still unknown.

Just blindly inoculating patients with amyloid antigen and expecting natural ability of human immunosystem is dangerous and causing various uncontrollable side effects such as encephalitis with No benefit.

Without knowing precise molecular mechanicm of Alzheimer disease, researchers focus only on creating antibodies against these proteins using mouse or something.  It's like "groping in the dark".

This kind of old "trial and error" approach is risky and almost ineffective for a large amount of time and money spent on clinical trials which all failed.

The latest technology of Alzheimer treatment is using bacterial virus called phage to produce antibody against Alzheimer-induced proteins.

These latest molecular biotechnology and medicine use quantum mechanics ?  No.  Drug research technology was developed independently, which has nothing to do with quantum mechanics.

Human B cells intrinsically have DNAs which can produce many kinds of antibodies against many different antigens, some of which may be Alzheimer's increasing proteins = target of immunotherapy.

Researchers isolate mRNA from these B cells, and produce cDNA from these mRNA using enzyme obtained from natural retrovirus.

And they increase DNA encoding random antibodies using bacterial enzyme called polymerase, and insert those antibody DNAs into phage virus by other bacterial DNA "cut-and-paste" enzymes.

All these processes are simple.  Just mix necessary ingredients in beakers or petri dishes, incubate it and wait.  ← No knowledge of quantum physics is needed here.

These genetically altered phage viruses produce many kinds of human antibodies on their surfaces.  Using some Alzheimer target proteins as antigen, they can pick out only phage producing antibodies against Alzheimer proteins.  Then those antibodies are used in Alzheimer immunotherapy.

All proteins, enzymes and viruses used in these reactions are gotten from the nature.  Humans are helpless, we cannot produce or manipulate those proteins directly.

Reason why Alzheimer treatment is deadend is we don't know the exact mechanism of how Alzheimer disease starts or progresses on the protein and molecular levels.

To understand proteins' reaction inside Alzheimer patients, we need real basic physics which shows us clear picture of how atoms or molecules of proteins touch and interact with other proteins.

Humans already have the technology of detecting and manipulating each single atom or molecule.  The ability to manipulate a single atom means we already have the ability to elucidate and cure Alzheimer disease.

We have the "ability" to cure disease, but do Not have the "theory" to realize it.

There is only one theory which is available now to handle atomic and molecular interactions.  This is infamous Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics.

Schrödinger equation is very old and unchanged since it was invented 100 years ago.  It is incredible that the physical mechanism of such an ancient quantum physics and spin is still unknown ( this p.6 )

This old quantum mechanics is completely helpless in Alzheimer and cancer treatments (= this is why these diseases are still incurable ), but physicists never doubt this uncanny quantum physics ?  ← How lazy they are !?

Is this weird quantum mechanics really successful ?  "Successful" means Schrödinger equation has to predict precise molecular behaviors.

But Schrödinger equation has No exact solution except for one-electron hydrogen atom, so it is a total failure, Not successful at all.

All physicists can do is "guess" and "choose" fake approximate solution with freely adjustable parameters called trial function or basis set, then integrate it instead of solving it (= because it cannot be solved ) to get fake energy.

Of course, it is not enough just to integrate it once.  They have to choose many different fake trial functions out of infinite choices, integrate them and compare their fake energies to find the one which gives the lowest energy.

Tryng and integrating infinite kinds of trial functions is impossible ( this last ).
So when they find convenient fake solution which gives the energy close to experimental values, they intentionally stop this calculation.  ← too good to be true.

Just choosing convenient fake solution means this quantum mechanical method is a kind of "art" rather than science.

Metals and crystals have much simpler structure than proteins inside body.  Then, quantum mechanics can handle these simpler metals and crystals ?  No.

Quantum mechanics has to rely on fictitious quasiparticles with unreal mass and charge to describe all materials such as metal, crystal, semiconductor, superconductor, solar cell and biology.

Real science has to describe physical phenomena using only real objects.  Relying on fictitious quasiparticles forever means the current basic quantum mechanics is a wrong theory.

When quantum mechanics was invented in 1920s, there were No modern computers to calculate complicated interactions between many electrons using realistic atomic model.

So old quantum mechanics should have been just a "temporary" fake atomic model until modern computers are available and some other realistic atomic models replace it.

But once this outdated quantum physics is "deeply rooted" in the physics world and getting prestigious prizes, it is very hard to remove, no matter how unrealistic it is.

This is why quantum mechanics is completely useless and ignored by biologists even now.  And all students ruin their career and future, falling victims to the current fake science taught in schools.

Realistic atomic model replacing useless quantum mechanics is urgently needed to cure fatal diseases such as Alzheimer and prevent students from falling victims to fake science, destroying their careers.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Cancer therapy,  No progress.

[ Cancer is still incurable due to useless "basic" physics. ]

(B-1)  ↓ Insuperable barrier between fantasy physics and  

Breakthrough in cancer treatment could change the world ?
Cancer research news is full of "exaggerations" to get your hope up.

Despite a large amount of time and money spent in these researches, many diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer are still incurable.

If you get an advanced cancer, there is a very high chance that you will die within several years even now, even by using the current state-of-the-art "science".

What if cancer research substantially makes No progress ?
These science news are fake news just to get taxpayers' money ?

Trudeau's party lost popular votes in Canadian election by imposing carbon tax for fishy global warming science, while the world is freezing cold.

Climate change activist, Greta repeatedly insists "listen to the scientists".  But putting too much trust in "scientists" is really a wise choice ?

We blindly believe "scientists" and agreed with using huge taxpayers' money in research on quantum computer which is said to exploit fictional parallel worlds for its speed-up.  It's still useless, waste of money.

Just recently, the top peer-reviewed science journal Nature published the paper claiming Google quantum computer achieved what a classical computer needs 10000 years to calculate.  ← Really ?

This quantum computer 'supremacy' turned out false, an overblown lie.  Other researchers can calculate it in only 2.5 days instead of 10000 years using classical computers.

Why does such an unscientific thing happen ?  Because Google quantum computer is Not a calculator or computer.  Scientists and journals are lying.

All Google computer can do is generate some "random meaningless numbers" ( this latter ).  It cannot compute any useful thing.

Of course, classical (= ordinary ) computer also can easily generate random numbers.  But Google physicists intentionally chose the most inefficient way which takes 10000 years for classical computer to generate random numbers.

This kind of corruption is what the current "scientists" are doing.
Global warming is also doubtful, depending on artificial different models.

The "theory of everything" model dominating the current physics academia is based on unrealistic, unseen extradimensions.  ← this is "science" you can believe ?

Now the most promising cancer therapy is immunotherapy where doctors take out patients' immune cells, infect those cells with genetically-altered viruses and return them into patients' bodies.

Those genetically-altered immune cell is supposed to attack cancer cells.  This latest treatment uses basic physics such as quantum mechanics ?  No.

Virus is the most primitive organism which has existed on the earth for far longer time than human.  Humans just take wild virus from the nature and try to exploit its inherent multiplying mechanism for therapy.

All scientists can do is mix viruses and human cells in a test tube, and incubate it until virus DNA is transfered into human cells.  Humans cannot control this process.  They just entrust natural ability of virus with this gene transfer.

Even the latest cancer gene therapy which just exploits natural viruses causes various uncontrollable side effects.  And only a small part of cancers respond to it.

Gene derived from virus or virus living inside bacteria (= plasmid ) is called vector.  How do scientists insert artificial genes desirable for cancer therapy into these virus ( or plasmid ) vector DNA ?

It's very simple.  All scientists can do is mix DNA and bacterial enzymes which can cut and reconnect genes in one test tube, incubate it and wait.

These viruses and enzymes causing biochemical reactions for gene therapy are gotten from the nature.  Humans are helpless, we cannot produce or manipulate proteins, molecules inside viruses directly.

To overcome untreatable diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer, it is necessary to clarify human body at the molecular level and manipulate proteins directly.

To manipulate proteins or DNA directly, we have to manipulate each single atom or molecule directly.  Humans already have technology of manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscopy.

The problem is we have No useful "atomic model" or theory to interpret atomic forces, even if we can measure atomic force and manipulate each single atom.

The current only atomic theory is very old Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics which was invented 100 years ago and still used, though this obsolete equation is completely useless in molecules and proteins.

Quantum mechanical calculation using Schrödinger equation is based on very simple mechanism, but it takes infinite time if you really try to do it, so impractical.

Schrödinger equation has No exact solution except for one-electron hydrogen atom.  All other atoms and molecules have to rely on approximate method, but this "approximate" is an inappropriate word.

Physicists just guess and choose fake approximate solution called trial function or basis set with freely-adjustable parameters and integrate Schrödinger equation instead of solving it (= because it cannot be solved ).

The form of this fake solution (= trial function or basis set ) has No limitation.  You can choose any form of fake solution out of infinite choices, which cannot predict any meaningful physical values, so useless.

Each time you pick some fake solution, you can get its fake energy by integral.  Repeat this tedious work infinite times (= because infinite arbitrary forms of fake solutions are allowed ), and find the lowest-energy solution among them.

Of course, repeating infinite calculations is impossible which takes infinite time ( this last, this p.13 ).  So when you get the fake solution giving "desired energy", you stop this calculation deliberately.

This quantum mechanical method based on artificially choosing convenient fake solution is an art rather than science.

To describe Pauli principle based on unrealistic spin, they change this fake solution into antisymmetric wavefunction which is expressed as complicated "determinant" in multi-electron atoms, and this complicated wavefunction makes even the integral harder ( this p.16, this p.3 ).

We prove this quantum mechanical method with Pauli antisymmetric wavefunction is contradictory and false in multi-electron atoms.

Metals and crystals contain much more atoms and electrons.  So this complicated integral of Schrödinger equation is impractical and impossible.

So physicists rely on fictitious quasiparticles with unreal charge and mass (= negative mass, this p.12 ), which are just nonphysical math symbols with No physical figure in all materials such as superconductor and crystal.

Calculation of these unreal quasiparticles in condensed matter uses density fucntional theory (= DFT ), which is very rough and dishonest approximation treating many-electron solid as if it were an one-electron object.

In DFT, physicists choose not only fake solution but also fake potential.  Choosing convenient solution means these quantum mechanical methods have No ability to predict physical values, so useless.

Even simple metal and crystal must rely on nonphysical quasiparticles.
In much more complicated proteins in human body, quantum mechanics is much more useless and meaningless.

This is why all biologists and medical doctors still ignore useless quantum mechanics based on fictional world.

There is a kind of "insuperable barrier" between realistic medicine ( or biology ) and unrealistic basic physics of fantasy quantum mechanics.

If applied science such as medicine cannot utilize realistic basic physics, manipulating molecules and proteins to cure diseases is impossible forever.

So old and false quantum mechanics not only obstructs all scientific development but also prevents us from curing fatal diseases.  And all science students ruin their careers by these useless science in school.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

"Force" is missing in quantum physics.

[ Quantum mechanics is useless in our daily life.  Why ? ]

(Q-1)  ↓ How to "solve" Schrödinger equation of  

Nobel prize in econimics was awarded to Harvard, MIT professors who fight against "poverty", while they mercilessly impose exorbitant tuition on students.

Evidence shows these "elite" universities tend to shun low-income students.  Academia tries to increase students from the world for their fake sciecne to get more subsidy in the name of Nobel prize ?

Despite the record-cold temperature, scientists rely on "unscientific" violence and teenage girl Greta as a "saint" to push their dubious science or religion ?

Blindly believing scientists is dangerous.  If scientists say "fantasy parallel worlds and extradimension are the only theory of everything !", they can get taxpayers' money limitlessly for their shady science ?  ← ridiculous.

Governments should check whether "scientists" who are not elected by voters are wasting taxpayers' money in meaningless, fake science or not.

Quantum mechanics is still completely useless in all applied science such as medicine and drug design.  Biologists ignore quantum physics which is based on unreal quasiparticles and many-worlds ( this p.2, this p.2 ).

You can never find quantum mechanical method in "actual" researches on DNA, protein, cancer and Alzheimer which still rely on conventional biology kits with enzymes gotten from bacteria, cells, and "trial and error" approach, Not looking into atoms.

Because Schrödinger equation which is the only way for quantum mechanics to deal with atoms, is completely useless in actual molecules, proteins and medicine.

We experience various "forces" in our daily life.  Force is indispensable for constructing buildings and transporting goods.  We cannot live without "force".

But what if the current basic physics = quantum mechanics ignores "force" ?  It is impossible to manipurate atoms, molecules and proteins without "force" for curing diseases forever.

The present physics says there are four fundamental forces in the nature.  But none of them are real.

Electromagnetic force is said to be mediated by unreal and unobservable virtual photons whose mass can be imaginary ( this p.3 ).  Their calculation always diverges to infinity, which is unavailable in our daily life.

Fractional-charge quarks can never be detected or isolated.
Quarks are also said to be mediated by unreal virtual gluons, which are unobservable, too.

Neutron is said to emit unreal virtual weak boson whose mass is unrealistically heavy and whose weak force is undetectable in our daily life.

Gravity is mediated by virtual graviton in extra-dimensions ?
All these fundamental forces lack reality without practical application.

Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics cannot use real "force" or force carriers.  It just relys on fake imaginary energy.

Schrödinger equation has No exact solution except for one-electron hydrogen atom.  In all other multi-electron atoms or molecules, we have to choose some arbitrary approximate trial wavefunction as "fake" solution.

This trial (fake) function is called "basis set".
You can choose any arbitrary trial functions (= basis set ) freely from infinite choices.

After choosing trial functions, we integrate the whole Schrödinger equation to get fake energy, instead of solving it (= because we cannot solve it ).

OK.  We can get "one fake total energy-1" of multi-electron atoms.
But we cannot do or predict anything just by getting this fake energy.

Next, we choose different trial fucntion and get different fake energy-2.  Then, we choose different trial function and get different fake energy-3.

Repeating this process many times, we can get many different kinds of fake atomic energies.  Then we pick the lowest energy from these many fake energies gotten using different trial functions.  The lowest energy means the most stable state of electrons.

The problem is there is No limitation on the form of trial functions.
We can choose any trial functions (= basis set ) from infinite choices.

So finding the lowest energy from among infinite different energies gotten from infinite different trial functions takes infinite time, if we really try to do it ( this p.2, this p.13 ).

So the current quantum mechanical calculation based on random "guess" and "choice" of trial functions is "art" rather than science.

Why do we have to adopt such a complicated and unscientific quantum mechanical method in atomic energy calculation ?
Because there is No "force" in quantum mechanics.

If we can calculate "force" between electrons and nuclei, we can easily predict which direction each electron will move until it arrives at the most stable (= lowest-energy ) state.

So if "force" is available, calculation and comparison of infinite different trial functions as seen in quantum mechanics are unnecessary !

The problem is each electron always spreads over all space as electron cloud in quantum mechanics which prevents easy, realistic calculation.

If each electron is a real moving particle, electrons can avoid each other, and we can easily find the lowest energy (= stable ) state where electrons are just on the opposite sides of a nucleus.

But a electron cloud spreading all space cannot avoid each other in quantum mechanics which uses unphysical mechanism of "penetrating wavefunction" to cause attraction where only fake energy (= Not force ) can be gotten by integrating wavefunction.

It's not enough just to compute electromagnetic force.
We have to compute Pauli principle = repulsive force.

But quantum mechanics does Not admit Pauli repulsion to be a real force.  It cannot describe Pauli principle using real physical objects ( this p.6, this p.3 ).  Why can't Pauli principle be force ?

When we calculate forces betweem two atoms A and B, we have to calculate forces between electrons of atom A and B.  ← Even this basic calculation is impossible in quantum mechanics !

Pauli principle adopts strange math trick called "antisymmetric wavefunction" where if we exchange any two electrons, the sign of the total wavefunction becomes the opposite.

To do so, electrons 1 of atom A must exist both in atom A and B.
Similarly, electrons 2 of atom B must exist both in atom A and B.

So electrons belonging to atoms A and B are indistinguishable according to quantum Pauli principle.

As a result, calculating forces between electrons 1 of atom A and electrons 2 of atom B is impossible, because electrons 1 exist both in atoms A and B at the same time like in parallel worlds = superposition.

All quantum mechanics can do is integrate the wavefunction to get unphysical exchange "energy" (= Not force ) as Pauli repulsion.

By calculating force, we can predict which direction each electron or atom will move in chemical reaction, and construct useful nano-machine to cure diseases like constructing building in our daily life.

Schrödinger equation uses the same mechanism of Coulomb electric energy and de Broglie wave as Bohr's realistic model, which is why Schrödinger equation also can get energies close to real values.

But in multi-electron atoms, calculating and comparing infinite kinds of fake energies by Schrödinger equation is impractical and useless.

We prove Schrödinger equation cannot get exact energy (= conserved as the single total energy ) in multi-electron atoms, so wrong like contradictory Pauli exchange energy.

Using two basic principles of Coulomb force and de Broglie wave, we can easily get exact, concrete electron's orbit and compute "real force ( including Pauli repulsion )" to predict the direction of chemical reaction.

Unfortunately, in 1920s when quantum mechanics was invented, there were No modern computers to calculate multi-electron atoms using realistic moving electrons.  This was the start of fake science disaster as you see today.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Where does science stop ?

[ Quantum old model keeps us from advancing forever. ]

(Q-1)  ↓ Quantum mechanics has No physical picture by  

Here's a question for you.
Did you find any Nobel winners this year whose research is very likely to be useless forever, just the media and academia make a big deal of it ?

About a century has passed since BigBang, expanding universe was first proposed.  BigBang is still useless for us.

Because our solar system is Not expanding at all.
This fantasy early universe model is too far away from the earth to confirm, so useless and meaningless forever like particle physics.

The space is filled with astonishingly uniform and isotropic microwaves called CMB.  The problem is Nobel winner, Jim Peebles misinterprets this microwaves as a remnant of illusory BigBang.

This misinterpretation turned 'cosmic microwave' into a hotbed of other fantasy such as parallel universes.

It's impossible for uniform microwave to keep its perfect uniformity.  Each microwave collided with different kinds of dusts, changed its shape and easily lost its uniformity for 13.8 billion years.

So it is natural to think this perfect uniformity of cosmic microwaves is caused by "uniform space medium" Not by fantasy BigBang.  Redshift = longer wavelength of light emitted from distant stars is due to Compton scattering.

Though the world is right in the midst of record-cold temperature, Nobel prize will be awarded to future AOC, Greta for global warming ?

Laptops are useful, but electric vehicles remain useless thanks to the current unrealistic basic physics.  Why did the current science become so disastrous ?

Historic discovery and invention were made through many failures where existing theories didn't work, as seen in Edison, Wright brothers and Alfred Nobel.

Transistor used in PC was no exception.  Existing quantum mechanics was useless.  They had to 'find' good transistor by trial and error.  So "quantum mechanics is used in modern technology" is fake news.

Those great inventors had something in common.
All of them used "real material" and "real concepts" as their tools to invent real useful things.

Without nitroglycerin (= real thing ), Alfred Nobel couldn't have made dynamite.
Without calculating 'air pressure' (= real force ), Wright brothers couldn't have achieved stable flight.

The nitroglycerin is a real, tangible thing.  'Air pressure' is a real force whose carriers are 'air molecules' which are also real and tangible objects.

How about the atomic scale ?  Humans already have technology of seeing and manipulating each single atom.

Using a special material called "piezo actuator" which slightly expands or contracts depending on the size of applied electric voltage, we can move microscope probe on the scale of less than a atom (= ~pm, this p.3 )

In scanning tunneling microscope, only when the distance between the probe's tip and the sample is extremely short = less than several atoms, and enough voltage is applied, the weak electric current flows between them, which is called quantum tunnel.

Quantum mechanics tries to treat "empty vacuum" and "air" as "wall-like solid barrier (= insulator )", and believes an electron with unreal negative kinetic energy can penetrate the barrier like ghost in tunnel.  ← nonsense.

It is quite natural for an electron to go through empty vacuum from the tip atom to the sample atom, when their distance is very short.  So the tunnel is "classical (= realistic )" phenomenon, it does Not need quantum mechanical ghost.

Manipulating each single atom means we should be able to design and construct nano-machines using that technology now to cure diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer.  But we cannot.  Why ?

Because we voluntarily discard real tools and concept on the atomic scale, though there are actually "real objects" even in microscopic world.

Without real tools, we cannot make anything.
Why are we doing such a ridiculous thing ?

Atomic force microscopy can measure forces combining Coulomb electric force and Pauli exclusion repulsion ( this p.2 ) in each atom.

Pauli repulsion prevents us from penetrating walls.  So we can "feel" the Pauli repulsion as "real force" both in macro and microscopic world.

Strangely, quantum mechanics cannot admit this Pauli repulsion to be a real force.  There is Neither physical interpretation nor force carrier in uncanny Pauli principle ( this p.6, this p.3 )

It's like Wright brothers couldn't measure "air pressure" in designing planes or Alfred Nobel couldn't use nitroglycerin as a tool to cause strong pressure of a bomb blast.

Without accepting real force or thing as a tool, we cannot make any useful nanomachine even if we already can manipulate a single atom.

We have to calculate another major force = Coulomb electric force.  To calculate Coulomb force between two electrons, we need to separate them as an individual particle, and measure the distance between two electrons.

The problem is quantum mechanics cannot separate two electrons, because each electron always spreads over all space as "vague electron cloud".

So in quantum mechanics, we cannot prepare realistic "tools" to construct nano-machine, though those tools actually exist there.  ← contradiction.

Strange to say, Pauli principle has Only "energy" and No force, which is counter-intuitive and impossible to describe using real things.

Because the "energy" is defined as "force" × distance.  "Energy" and "force" are inseparable concepts.  If "energy" exists, "force" must exist, too.

How was such an unrealistic Pauli energy created ?
In fact, the energy calculated in quantum mechanics is Not real but "fake energy".

Quantum mechanics cannot solve Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms.  They just choose fake approximate solution with freely-adjustable parameters and integrate the equation instead of solving it.

It is a very difficult, laborious work.  Electrons in each atom tend to be in the most stable state with the lowest total energy.  We have to find this lowest energy and electrons' positions which give the lowest energy.

But there are infinite different electron's positions in all space !
You must try and calculate all energies in all possible electrons' positions and positional relationships.

After that, you compare all these infinite different energies of different electrons' positions to find the lowest energy among them.

This quantum mechanical method takes infinite time, so impossible if you really try to do it.

Furthermore, in each electrons' position, it takes infinite time.
There is No exact solution in multi-electron Schrödinger equation, all you can do is "guess it".

 You have to choose every possible fake (= approximate ) solution out of infinite choices and compare all those energies to find the lowest one.

So as long as you rely on this ridiculous quantum mechanics, you cannot compute or handle multi-electron atoms, molecules, let alone cure diseases.

This comes down to the problem where Schrödinger equation ( and Pauli ) cannot deal with real "force".

If you can calculate force between electrons or atoms, you can easily predict which direction these electrons or atoms will move in chemical reaction, which takes only little time.

If you can utilize atomic "force", you don't need to calculate all energies in all possible electrons' positions to find the lowest energy to which electrons should move.  ← Comparing all possible (fake) energies takes infinite time, as I said.

In fact, energies computed by quantum mechanical laborious method is essentially fake, so physically meaningless.  The total ( ground state ) energy must be conserved as the single lowest energy, wherever electrons exist inside atom.

But we prove Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atom cannot have the single conserved total energy.  To conserve the total energy, a multi-electron atom must split into more than two unreal independent hydrogens, which is impossible.

Strange Pauli energy appears as pseudo-"exchange energy (= only energy, No force can be calculated )", only after integrating artificially introduced antisymmetric wavefunctions ( this p.13 ).

But we prove this Pauli energy expressed as energy difference between symmetric and antisymmetic wavefunctions disappears, when the total energy is conserved as the single energy (= of course, this is impossible because Schrödinger has No solution giving the single constant total energy in multi-electron atoms ).

So Schrödinger equation and quantum Pauli exchange energy are self-contradictory, physically impossible and false.  This is why Pauli principle has only strange fake energy without real force or real physical interpretation.

To deal with muti-electron atomic and molecular behaviors, we have to compute real "forces" among electons.

The first step is we must admit electrons are actually moving and avoiding each other not only outside but also inside atoms, giving up vague electron cloud model in quantum mechanics.

We can easily find the most stable state (= the lowest energy) where electrons just avoid each other on the opposite sides, if we use real separate moving electrons.

If there is only Coulomb electric force, it cannot explain atomic behavior.  An electron would be attracted to a positive nucleus, and the electron's orbital radius can be shorter to zero, unlimitedly.

Some other "external force" must keep electrons from approaching nuclei.  In the double slit experiment, the electron's de Broglie wave causes interference, and the electron is "kicked out" of the destructive interference area.

This "de Broglie wave interference" is clearly another "external force" (= real force ) caused by the ripple of the medium (= real force carrier ) through which an electron is moving.

By avoiding destructive interference of de Broglie wave, an electron orbital radius becomes definite, Not random, and it can predict exact quantized atomic energies.

The conclusion is that using "two tools" of Coulomb force among electons and their de Broglie waves, we can move forward to easily and efficiently deal with any muti-electron molecules, solids and proteins.

And this real atomic model will surely lead to curing diseases by constructing useful nano-machine based on the existing nano-technology = atomic force microscope.

Unfortunately, In 1920s, physicists couldn't use convenient modern computer or calculate three-body multi-electron helium by real electron model.  Now is the time to do it.

Density functional theory (= DFT ) is very rough and inaccurate approximation which forcedly changes multi-electron Schrödinger equation into one-electron pseudo-equation ( this p.3 ).

In compensation for this absurd simplification, DFT must rely on unknown pseudo-potential called "exchange-correlation functional", which form can be artificially chosen as you like, so DFT is completely useless, cannot predict any new physical values ( this p.17 ).

This DFT cannot deal with real "force", either.  It can just get fake "energy", which is impractical, taking infinite time to compare all possible fake solutions, as I said.

All current physicists rely on this useless DFT to interpret "forces" of each single atom measured by atomic force microscope (= AFM, this p.3, this p.3, this p.4, this p.2 ).

Relying on old, obsolete quantum mechanics which prohibits real force and real moving electrons is the main reason why we cannot move forward to apply real nano-technology to medicine and other industory.

Diffirent from the fake news, there are No realistic physical shapes in electrons, photons, spin and solids.   Those are only nonphysical math symbols or unreal quasiparticles in quantum physics.

If you admit "real force", you must discard uncanny electron's spin, which is the origin of Pauli exchange energy.  And all other nonphysical quantum field theory, Higgs and theory of everything must be discarded in compensation for accepting reality.

This is the biggest obstacle now.  Once unreal quantum physics was established and deep-rooted in science world, academia desperately tries to defend their old theory and prevent us from using real electrons and forces.

For vested interests of a handful of old scientists, all other scientific progress must be sacrificed forever ?  ← Cancer and Altzheimer are also incurable forever.  Can you accept it ?

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Nobel prize is the biggest obstacle to science ?

[ New 'geocentric theory' dominates academic world. ]

(N-1)  ↓ Protecting useless science forever is the true role of  

Nobel is the most honorable, prestigious prize in the world.
But what if Nobel prize is the biggest obstacle to science ?

Famous figures, Trump and Greta are mentioned as possible winners.
Nobel is used just as 'attention-getter' or contributes to anything ?
We need to review it.

Science awarded Nobel prize can be classified into two groups.

One is 'useful' science which actually improved our daily life.
Another is 'symbolic' but 'empty' science for which huge taxpayers' money has been wasted, making No contribution to our society.

Who benefits from those 'useless' science ?
When some science gets prestigious Nobel prize, a large amount of money pours into it from around the world.

All the media and academia sensationalize it as if Nobel was the only absolute 'arbiter' of science.  Anyone opposing it is excommunicated and persecuted like Galileo.

Once academia and universities receive huge benefits of influential Nobel, they desperately try to protect their vested interests and positions, even if it is 'fake science'.

It's like the church = then academia persecuted 'heretic' to protect their old Aristotelian geocentric theory which dominated the world for more than 1000 years and solidified their academic status.

'Persecution' alreadly started as 'crackdown' against free speech and global warming skeptics, while the world is freezing in the record-cold temperature.

Once Nobel approves imposing 'tax' and fake science on people, nobody is allowed to oppose them ?  ← It's very dangerous tendency and could change Nobel from its 'prestigious prize' into a major obstacle to the development of new science.

J.J. Thomson discovered an electron as a "moving real particle".
Bohr's atomic model succeeded in predicting precise energies based on this moving electron and experimentally confirmed de Broglie wave.

Science tragedy started from here.
Imagine atoms where more than two electrons are flying around and interacting with each other.

How can you compute the orbits or trajectory of those electrons ?
Of course, in 1920s, there were No convenient computers.

It was impossible to calculate those complicated orbits of multi-electron atoms only using a pen and paper.  So physicists had No choice but to give up realistic electron model.

Instead, Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics came.
Schrödinger equation also uses the same principle of de Broglie wave and Coulomb energy and got exactly the same energy results as Bohr model.

The problem is the orbital angular momentum of Schrödinger equation can be unrealistically zero, which causes an electron to crash into a nucleus and destructive interference of de Broglie wave.

So quantum mechanics started to say "Forget realistic picture of electrons !  A single electron can be everywhere simultaneously like a dead and alive cat living in parallel worlds !"

Furthermore, quantum mechanics had to invent "unphysical spin" where an electron must be spinning faster-than-light to generate magnetic field which accidentally agreed with Bohr magneton.

This spin is uncanny because an electron must rotate twice = 720o (= Not 360o ) to return to its original state.  So quantum electron spin completely lost its reality.

How could Schrödinger equation deal with multi-electron atoms without computers ?  Of course, Schrödinger equation could Not have exact solution in multi-electron helium, either.

They just choose fake (= approximate ) solution with freely-adjustable parameters and integrate it ( instead of solving it ), which takes infinite time.

Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms cannot have true solution, which means Schrödinger wavefunction inside a atom is a collection of different total energies (= the total energy is Not conserved as a single one ), which is physically unimaginable.

Heisenberg changed the interpretation of real de Broglie wave into "uncertain probability" where we can never know the precise motion of electrons inside atoms lost in fantasy worlds.

Nobel prize officially endorses this eternally "uncertain" physics with Pauli strange spin, prohibits us from looking deeper into atomic reality forever, which means it obstructs the science development.

Fake science news became conspicuous to make useless physics "look" useful.  If PC and smartphone really use quantum mechanics, these machines could already have been created and commercialized just when quantum mechanics was born in 1920s.

But they couldn't.  Those state-of-the-art machines and transistors were discovered by "trial and error" far later, irrelevant to old quantum physics.

Since Einstein rejected "space medium", the physics needed unreal virtual particles with imaginary mass to express all particle interactions.

Feynman found these infinite virtual particles filling all possible states give only meaningless infinity.  So they adopted very dishonest, artificial trick to cancel this infinity to get tiny finite physical values ( this p.4 ).

This QED trick called renormalization faced strong opposition even from founders Dirac and Feynman as "hocus-pocus".

But Nobel prize endorsed these unreal virtual particles about which you probably didn't know, because Nobody uses this useless, nonphysical QED virtual particles in our daily life which is said to apply only to very tiny negligible value by artificial trick.  ← Impractical science started.

From here, we can classify useless science ( forever ) which got Nobel prize into four groups.

The first group is imaginary elementary particles which allegedly appeared for too short time to detect directly only inside artificial circumstance = particle colliders.

These doubful short-lived particles can never be isolated from other garbage irrelevant particles inside colliders, so unavailable and useless forever except for Nobel prize and wasting taxpayers' money in meaningless collider.

God particle, Higgs, weak boson and quarks belong to this group.
Fractional-charge quarks can never be isolated or useful even after Gell-Mann = the father of quark died.

The second group is imaginary objects which are too far away from the earth to confirm, so useless forever.

Fictional BigBang, black hole, neutron star and meaninglessly repeated Einstein tests belong to this group.  Black hole is still useless even after half a century has passed since its first discovery, except for Nobel prize and meaningless telescope.

The third group is imaginary objects which has "too small effect" on detector.  So these too faint ghost-like objects are physically meaningless and useless forever.   Here are some examples.

Dark matter cannot be detected even by "ultra-sensitive" detectors.
Gravitational wave is said to change LIGO detector by only one thousandth a proton diameter, which is too weak and useless forever except for Nobel prize.

The fourth group is fictitious particles which can never be observed.
They try to explain real phenomena using unreal things such as quantum parallel worlds, negative kinetic energy, extra-dimension, QED virtual and quasi-particles in solid physics.

BCS theory in superconductor got Nobel prize, where unreal quasiparticles such as phonon and Bogoliubov are just nonphysical math symbols which cannot give us any concrete physical shape.

It means the absolute ruler = Nobel prize officially started to force physicists to use unreal, nonphysical quasiparticles without replacing them by real particles even in applied physics.  ← Physics stops progressing forever !

Fractional-charge quasiparticle (= not quark ) also got Nobel prize ( this p.280 ).

Nobel winners, Anderson and van Vleck also push fictitious quasiparticles.  Just recently, topological unreal quasiparticle won Nobel prize ( this p.19, Majorana )  ← Condensed matter physics close to us is disastrous.

If you try to use real particles instead of unreal virtual or quasiparticles to explain physical phenomena, you are persecuted by Nobel prize and academia as "heretic", like geocentric theorists denounced Galileo !

Nobel prize was awarded to parallel-world quantum computer which is fiction and still useless ( forever ).

Nobel winners, Gross and Hooft are also pioneers of virtual particles ( this p.2 ) and extradimensional string theory, which cannot even be tested, so useless forever.

Prize was originally to encourage scientists to clarify deeper "real" mechanicsm in the nature, which benefited our society.

But the current excessive prizes are just a political tool to make useless, fictional science "look" useful, which not only wastes our taxpayers' money but also obstructs our future science development forever.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Einstein  dangerous globalism.

[ Lost individuality, political correctness originated in Einstein ? ]

(Q-1)  ↓ All particles are "faceless" in Einstein  

Everyone must be the "same" ?  No individuality ?
Political correctness is too extreme ?

Undoubtedly, this world's stifling, dangerous "globalism" caused Trump presidency and Brexit.

In schools, teachers force the same value and idea on students across the world, and make them believe going to college is the only way to succeed in their life.

After graduating, employees have to work as a faceless "cogwheel" in companies stifling their individuality, giving up their dream, just to make a living.

In science, we are forced to accept fantasy BigBang, black hole and extra-dimensions as the only "theory of everything".

The world worships Nobel prize as the only absolute holy ritual to judge whether the science is real or not, while academia keeps people ignorant that the current science is full of fictitious particles.

In industry, all carmakers focus on "pie-in-the-sky" self-driving car.  Almost all companies desperately pitch fake AI just by dressing up old obsolete physics in a sheep's clothing.

In the record-cold September, all the media tries to spread fake global warming,  politicians push green-new-deal fantasy.

The way to rely on one "mysterious teenage girl" as the only savior reveals climate change is not a normal science but just a "pseudo-science religion".

This abnormal trend of "unification" also dominates academia, scientists.
Honest climatologists denying global warming are ostracized from academic world.

The remaining 97% scientists are non-climatologists who research on illusory parallel worlds and extradimensions.  ← this is a trick of climate science.

Freedom of idea and science is at stake by "globalist dictatorship" which tries to censor even the internet = the only free-speech space left.

The current "science emperor" = Einstein, who was kicked out from Nazi Germany, tries to retaliate against the world by shackling us to his fictional science forever ?

How does the world head toward dangerous globalism ?
It started from "wrong riddles" made up by physicists 100 years ago.

Einstein dismissed the idea of "real medium" in space to explain the constant light speed c seen by any observers moving at different speeds.

So in Einstein relativity, the light cannot be expressed as "electromagnetic wave" travelling through some "medium" which he rejected.  He claims the light is Not wave but a photon particle.

But all phenomena such as the light interference, refraction and wavelength show the light is wave.  It's impossible that a "ball-like photon particle" explains those interference.

In two-slit experiment, a single photon must go through two slits simultaneously to cause interference, splitting into two fictional parallel-worlds in quantum mechanics.

This riddle of whether light is wave or particle is still unsolved mystery which made Feynman say "Nobody understands it."

Feynman considered these parallel worlds as abstract "path integral" model where a single photon or electron can simultaneously exist in all possible states or paths like a dead and alive cat.

Here's a riddle.  Can you prepare anything which can be both a particle and wave which always looks the same seen by any oberserves moving at different speeds in different directions ?

Einstein and quantum mechanics tried to solve this riddle, but there is No such grotesque thing !  It's impossble to describe it using real things.

If you try to express a light as a "ball-like photon particle", you cannot explain the light wave interference and polarization, which are purely "wave nature".

In the same way, if you try to express an electron as a ball-like particle, you cannot explain electron's de Broglie wave interference.

It means all colorful pictures you see in science news are fake.
Then, how can you solve this riddle to describe each particle ?

The theory uniting Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics is called "quantum field theory" or "quantum electrodynamics (= QED )" where an electron is expressed by Dirac equation, and a photon is expressed by Maxwell equation.

Quantum field theory describes each electron and photon as nonphysical math symbols (= a, b, c, d .. ) called "operator" which has No physical figure.  ← faceless.

The "wave" nature is expressed as abstract exponential function (= e-ikx ) with complex number.  ← No realistic wave picture here.  Again, faceless wave.

The most difficult riddle is each electron or photon must be in all possible places at once in quantum parallel worlds.

In quantum field theory, each particle has No definite position (= x ), which means each single particle is created or annihilated over all vacuum space at the same time, like a ghost !

This is why each particle must be just an unreal math with No physical shape or size.  Because a real object with definite size and shape cannot appear in all space at the same time like a ghost shapeless math operator.

Einstein relativistic world has No absolute space, so its space is also "ghost" where all things must look the "same" seen by any observers moving at different speeds.

To meet this very strict Einstein rule, all space must contain "infintie virtual particles" with infinite kinds of energies and momentums (= k ) ranging from infinity to minus infinity.

If so, you can always watch the same scene composed of infinite kinds of virtual particles, no matter how fast or slow you run, wherever you go.

This strange fantasy world is Einstein relativistic quantum field theory where particle and place are "faceless ghost" with No individuality, No figure, which reminds us of the current globalism.

These infinite kinds of momentums and particles are exressed as integral ( this p.12 ) by which all QED calculation results miserably diverge to infinity.

This characterless Einstein world cannot give any unique meaningful physical values.  So physicists resorted to the most dishonest idea that infinite virtual particles can be cancelled out by negative infinite bare charge and mass of real particles ( this p.4, this p.4 ), which can be adjusted.

This ad hoc QED trick is called renormalization which even founders Dirac and Feynman criticized as "hocus-pocus" or "wrong".

Einstein world is so-called "ultimate globalism" where all particles completely lose their individuality, shape, size and even their position.

But all things around us have their unique properties, figures and values.
Ironically, the only way to give some unique, meaningful values to this Einstein QED is a wrong and dishonest math trick where arbitrary "change of variables" can give "aribitrary" finite values as you like.

So this QED with infinite virtual particles and artificial math trick cannot predict any values like the current only "theory of everything" string theory containing as many as 10500 different worlds with different freely-adjustable parameters.

In quantum field theory, all particles such as Higgs, quark, weak boson, pion, hadron, string and even fictitious quasiparticles in condensed matter are faceless, nonphysical math symbols with No unique physical figure or size.

All these doubtful particles are still useless for our society, just wasting taxpayers' money in meaningless colliders and telescopes, exploiting Nobel prize.

This Einstein faceless, meaningless science forced academia to find other money-making tool such as distorted globalism and political correctness to keep getting subsidy by which they control the media and politicians.  ← vicious cycle.

Restoring real physical shape, face and honesty in the current faceless science is the first step for us to advance and break the dangerous globalism which shackles us to their warped value, spoils our future by making us ignorant.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

AI  in quantum mechanics ?

[ "God equation" of quantum physics is useless. ]

(A-1)  ↓ AI, machine learning are fake science.  

Artificial intelligence (= AI ) and machine learning have come ?
It could design drugs and cure diseases ?  Or it's just media-hype ? Elon's fantasy ?  New China threat ?

Immortality by overcoming all diseases is human's dream.

To cure diseases, we have to clarify all mechanisms of human body.
All protein's reactions inside cells are due to atomic electrons' interactions.

What is the current leading "God equation" to describe atomic and molecular interactions inside human body ?

God equation is Einstein dream = theory of everything ?
But this theory of everything called string theory relies on delusive extra-dimensions.

String theory including as many as 10500 different theories with different freely-adjustable parameters cannot predict any physical values or even be tested.

So Einstein dream = theory of everything is useless and inappropriate as "God equation" to explain atomic interaction.

How about Einstein general relativity ?  General relativity talks only about "imaginary" objects too distant to be useful.  Even GPS doesn't use it.

How about Einstein special relativity ?  The theory uniting quantum mechanics and special relativity is called quantum electrodynamics (= QED ).

This QED uses an ad hoc, tricky idea that infinite unreal virtual particles are cancelled out by infinite unobservable bare charge and mass of a real particle to get some finite values.

QED is just an artificial math trick subtracting infinity from infinity to get only very tiny values such as g-factor and Lamb shift.  QED cannot apply to ordinary Coulomb energy in atomic interaction inside human body.

So both Einstein special and general relativity are useless as "God equation" to explain atomic interactions inside human body.

AI and machine learning are just a mere "method" of helping other theories governing physical phenomna to compute faster.  AI itself is Not a theory.

So if the basic physical theory remains old and useless, no matter what fancy AI technologies you use, it is meaningless.

When you read science articles such as drug design, cancer research, computer transistor and machine learning, you will notice all of them are based on density functional theory (= DFT, this p.2 left ).

What is this DFT ?  Is it related to "transport" ?  DFT is so-called "God equation" to explain every atomic behavior inside organisms ?

In 1920s, physicists couldn't compute atomic orbits of mulit-electrons due to lack of modern computers.  So they gave up real atomic picture and instead, relied on nonphysical quantum wavefunction.

The problem is quantum mechanics couldn't solve Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms, either.

So all physicists can do is choose fake approximate solution with freely-adjustable parameters and integrate the equation instead of solving it.

It is a very difficult, laborious work.  When you try to find the lowest-energy positions of electrons, you have to calculate energies in all possible electrons' positions and compare them.

In each electrons' position, it takes infinite time.  You have to choose every possible fake solution out of infinite choices and compare their energies to find the lowest one.

You cannot even "integrate" Schrödinger equation without formulas.
Each solid or crystal contains almost infinite atoms and electrons, which cannot be handled by quantum Schrödinger equation.

So physicists started to use "unreal quasipartcile model" to explain many-body problem in condensed matter, which is purely a dishonest method.

This quasiparticle model treats the whole solid as if it were one single quasi-electron with fake mass and charge.

DFT is a very rough approximation treating many electrons as one single fake electron ( this p.2, this p.3 ), because Schrödinger equation cannot deal with many electrons ( this p.4 ).

Is it really possible for this one-electron DFT to describe many-electron phenomena correctly ?  Of course, Not.

In compensation for easy one-electron approximation, DFT must include unknown pseudo-potential called exchange-correlation functional ( this p.22 ) into which all annoying Pauli principle and mulit-electrons' effect are supposed to be packed.

You can freely choose any form of this pseudo-potential = exchange-correlation functional out of infinite choices ( this p.20 ).  So DFT cannot predict any new physical values, though it's called 'first-principle'.

There is No universal pseudo-potential (= functional ) to explain all phenomena correctly ( this p.17 ).  No matter what functional is invented, someone will always find a case where it fails.

AI and machine learning just help this useless DFT to estimate what pseudo-potential (= functional, this p.5 right ) or fake solution (= basis set ) should be chosen.

AI itself is Not atomic theory.  So as long as the basic atomic quantum theory is useless, AI or machine leaning is meaingless, just wasting money and time.

The current AI is like decorating 'decrepit house' built on 100-year-old, wobbly foundation called quantum mechanics for the media and academia to make it look fancy, state-of-the-art with fake facade.

Without replacing this old, shaky foundation = quantum mechanics by new one, we cannot make any scientific progress to construct stable high-rise building on it.

Quantum mechanics has irreparable basic flaws.
Spin model cannot admit Pauli exclusion repulsion to be real force.

It means you cannot calculate "force" between atoms in quantum physics, which tries to express fake "Pauli exchange energy (= Not force )" by integrating the equation.

As I said, this quantum mechanical method of "integral" takes infinite time.  You have to try all possible electrons' positions, calculate their infinite different energies and compare all of them to find the lowest energy state.

We prove quantum mechanics is wrong, because this Pauli principle is invalidated when Schrödinger equation has exact solution.  Multi-electron atoms cannot get exact solution, no matter what fake approximate solutions you choose.

So no matter how you try to apply fancy AI, machine learning or neural network to quantum mechanics, it is completely meaningless, just a waste of time.

Physicists try to even apply this fancy "machine learning" to illusory string theory.  ← No way !

It is impossible for quantum mechanics based on unreal parallel worlds and quasiparticles to describe actual physical phenomena correctly.

So "quantum mechanics is the most successful theory !" or "It is used in modern computer !" is untrue.  Physicists are lying to protect their vested interests and academic positions.  Here are some examples.

Science blogger, Lubos often personal-attacks Sean Carroll for promoting parallel-worlds.  But he never attacks Brian Greene who is also a strong supporter of parallel-world fiction.

Because Lubos is a translator of Greene's "elegant universe".
All major physics professors officially accept fictional parallel worlds as the leading quantum theory.

When it comes to string theory, his blog suddenly becomes boring and gibberish.

He never tries to explain to ordinary people about what "S-matrix" and "amplitude" mean.  Because he knows all these concepts in string theory have nothing to do with real world.  It's just wrong math and unreal extra-dimensions.

So Lubos tries to hide unrealistic nature of string theory for his interest, career and blog.  ← This is how the current unreal quantum theory has "survived" protected by academia.

One thing I appreciate about Sean is he openly confesses that he supports parallel worlds while many physicists such as Scott try to hide many worlds used in quantum computer, fearing negative public response.

Another physicist, Sabine suddenly said that our universe is 3-dimensional projection of a 2-dimensional space like hologram without showing any convincing reasons.

This holographic theory also needs unseen extradimensions.
Sabine intentionally avoids mentioning this key "extra-dimension" in her string theory section.

Because she knew extra-dimensions is fiction hard for ordinary people to accept, though her religious science leader Hawking strongly supported this extra-dimensional string theory.

In this way, all physicists and the media try to hide unrealistic nature of the current physics for their own interests, ignoring scientific reality, which prevents useless obsolete theory from being replaced by new more realistic one.

This is similar to 'global warming scam' where the media distorts facts.  There is no point in Friday climate strike ?

See this week physics is still useless.

 

You are deceived ?

[ The current physics you learn is just virtual illusion ? ]

(V-1)  ↓ Theory of everything is unreal extradimension ?  =  

What if we just live in fantasy Alice-like world ?
What if science is full of fake news as Trump says ?

The current leading "theory of everything" (= string or M theory ) uniting Einstein relativity with quantum mechanics says our world is fictional 11-dimensions.

"Nobody understands quantum mechanics."  Because physicists know quantum mechanics is nothing more than fantasy parallel worlds or philosopher's toy with no deeper truth.

In Esher's imaginary waterfall or Penrose's stairway, no matter how many steps you go up, you always return to the original point.

Einstein world is quite similar to this Escher's fantasy world.  There is No absolute space in Einstein relativity where all things are 'relative'.

So all physical phenomena must look the same, no matter how fast you move or wherever you go in relativity like Esher's stairway.

But Esher's stairway applies only to 2-dimensional world.
Our world is 3-dimensional.  So physicists dreamed up a bogus idea that our space is filled with infinite unreal virtual particles.

If infinite virtual particles pop up out of nothing, and flying around you at infinite kinds of different speeds from infinity to minus infinity where you always see the "same" scene of "infinite virtual particles", no matter how fast or slow you move, which is compatible with Einstein !

These infinite virtual particles are like Alice's fantasy mirror worlds.

But there is a serious problem.  The mass of this virtual particles is always unreal, it becomes "imaginary mass ( this p.3 )" which is incompartible with Einstein !

Another problem showed up.  The theory uniting quantum mechanics and Einstein special relativity is called "quantum electrodynamics (= QED )".

When you try to calculate some physical values using this QED, these values always diverge to infinity surrounded by infinite virtual particles ( this p.4 ),  which has No practical use.

So physicists had to adopt an ad hoc, unrealistic idea called renormalization where these infinite virtual particles can be cancelled out by "negative infinite" bare charge and mass of real particles ( this p.14 ).

This QED is nothing but a wrong trick where they just artificially subtract infinite bare parameters from infinite virtual particles to get finite values as they like ( this p.2 ).  ← too good to be true.

It is very easy to divide infinity into "another arbitrary infinity" and finite value using "change of variables".  So QED is just an useless, artificial trick with No ability to predict any physical values.

This QED math is nonsense.  No matter what finite value is added to infinity, this infinity remains infinite (= unchanged ).  So subtracting infinity from infinity must always be zero, which cannot express any physical values.

This is why many physicists such as Dirac and Feynman criticized this QED as "hocus-pocus" or "something wrong", which fact you probably don't know, because the media hides it.

You are deceived by the media and academia into falsely believeing that the current physics is state-of-the-art and very successful.
Using invisible "unreal virtual particles" is anything but successful.

The media just repeats boring cliche "the physics is great ! very successful ! God particle got Nobel prize !", they never show you how to calculate it or how Higgs gives mass in detail.

They try to make you ignorant.  Almost nobody knows the current physics lacks reality, relying on unreal quasiparticles in condensed matter and virtual particles in QED.

Even physicists do Not know complicated QED, because QED is very old and useless in our daily life.  They know even if they study QED for a long time, it's just a waste of time, they cannot get a job for it.

So only a very, very tiny number of old physicists know how to calculate this QED.  They don't want to lose their academic job.  They try to desperately hide nonphysical nature of QED by avoiding explaining it to ordinary people using simple words.

By making you "ignorant", the current unrealistic physics has survived until now, sacrificing ordinary people's future and freedom of science.

General relativity with gravity demands more strict rule where all phenomena must look the same seen by any observers not only moving at constant speeds, but also accelerating.  ← crazy.

It needs more kinds of infinite virtual particles and "more space" to contain them.  Our 3-dimensional space is Not enough.  It needs fantasy extra-dimensional space to lock up these virtual particles by ad hoc renormalization ( this p.27 ).

This is string (or M ) theory with as many as 10500 freely-adjustable parameters caused by extradimensions, so completely useless to predict physical values.

String theory is just like a 'fairy-tale theory' extending 'Alice's mirror worlds' to unseen "extra-dimensional world".

There is another 'theory of everything' candidate called 'loop quantum gravity' or spin network where the space is like spider's web, and each particle is just a nonphysical "math number" with no physical shape.

Einstein relativity forces very strict rule where all things look the same seen by any observers moving at different speeds, which causes unreal infinite virtual particles, as I said.

To satisfy this Einstein rule, loop quantum gravity resorted to unrealistic method of "eliminating the space itself", which is called "background independent".

Suppose you are 1.7 meter in height.  In this "background independent" world, surprisingly, you have No 'height' !  Because there is No space or coordinate by which your height is measured.

So if you declare that you are 3.0 meter tall, your height becomes 3.0 meter.  Because you yourself is 'space', there is No other space around you !

So a 'spider' in this loop quantum gravity cannot move into empty space between threads of cobwebs.  The spider and you are locked up only inside each thin thread of strange spin network.

This is unrealistic.  "No space" around you means "No obstruction" around you.  Why cannot you go outside of the thread ( this p.16  this p.3 upper-left ) ?  Loop quantum gravity cannot answer such basic questions.

Loop quantum gravity did not succeed as "unified theory".
Still No evidence.  Loop quantum gravity cannot predict any physical value ( this p.45 below ), which is why extra-dimensional string theory is more widely accepted than loop quantum gravity.

First of all, it's impossible for this spin network of loop quantum gravity to describe actual dynamic particles' motions.

While many electrons are moving around inside atoms, the threads (= electrons ) of spin-network easily get tangled up, which cannot move anymore.

This Einstein relativistic quantum field theory filled with infinite chaotic virtual particles is useless and irrelevant to our real world.  Just illusion.

But physicists had to keep developing this nonphysical theory to get research funds.  This is why they made up "fake scientific targets" called "symmetry".

In Einstein world, all things must "look" the same (= invariant ) seen by any observers moving at different speeds (= Lorentz transformation ).  This is called "Lorentz symmetry", which is one of those symmetries.

There are two types of particles in quantum mechanics: a boson and a fermion.  An electron is a fermion, and there is No boson of the electron.

Supersymmetric theory needs fictitious shadow boson (= selectron ), which is undetectable and has No influence on our world, so meaningless theory.

A man and a woman are different,  So if God suddenly exchanges all men and women across the world, our society would get into panic.

But in Einstein world, even if we exchange all bosons (= men ) and fermions (= women ), the world looks the same and calm.  This eerie world is called supersymmetry.

Of course, it's impossible to describe this supersymmetry using real things.  It is just nonphysical math theory giving No physical figure ( this p.13 ).

This supersymmetry also has many freely-adjustable parameters, completely useless, except for changing 26-dimensional "string theory" into 10-dimensional "superstring theory".

If a very big meteorite hits the earth, and the earth rotational speed changes, the world would panic.

But in Einstein unrealistic world, no matter how fast or slow the earth rotates, all things look the same !  This "rotational speed" corresponds to "phase" or "gauge", which are unphysical concepts, just abstract math.

When the total equation is unchanged by gauge (or phase ) transformation, it is called gauge symmetry.  When this gauge symmetry is broken by additional mass term, it is called Higgs mechanism.

These gauge and phase are unreal concepts irrelevant to our real world, so all particles such as Higgs and quarks based on this gauge symmetry are also unreal with No physical shape ( this p.4 ).

Actually, all these unstable particles such as pion, muon, weak boson, quarks and Higgs are still useless for us except for getting meaninglesss prizes like illusory black hole, gravitational wave and quantum computer.

It means all these useless concepts are illusion, Not worth wasting taxpayers' money for.

You may think all these virtual particles, extradimensions and Higgs are only about high-energy physics or distant cosmology irrelevant to your daily life.

But in fact, condensed matter physics near us is more unrealistic than these.

Phonon is one of unreal quasiparticles expressing "vibration" of solid.  Quantum mechanics cannot describe any multi-electron phenomena without relying on unreal quasiparticles.

Also in condensed matter, interaction between particles are expressed by abstract Feynman diagram using virtual "phonon" quasiparticle.

This "virtual phonon" is doubly unrealistic, because "virtual" means unreal mass, and "phonon" means unreal quasiparticle, which is worse than original QED.

Two electrons repel each other.  When atoms are vibrating, some two electrons "appear" to attract each other through positive nuclei between them.

Quantum mechanics explains this phenomenon by saying two electrons called Cooper pair attract each other through unreal "virtual phonon".

Relying on unreal quasi and virtual particles is Not science.
Actually these quantum interpretation gives No detailed physical figure except as nonphysical abstract math ( this p.6 )

Superconductor expels magnetic field, which is called Meissner effect.  How can the current physics explain this effect ?

They claim a photon (= a particle of light ? ) acquires "mass" through Higgs, and this "massive photon" explains "expelled magnetic field".  ← nonsense.

This superconductor contradicts the original Higgs which does Not interact with a photon, so a photon must Not have mass.

In fact, this Higgs inside superconductor is Not real Higgs but fake "Higgs analogue" which corresponds to Cooper pair composed of two electrons.

In this way, the condensed matter physics near you is more unrealistic than QED, because it is filled with fake quasiparticles and "analogue".  These are also nonphysical math objects with No physical shape ( this p.26 )

Under these fake science, academia needs to fabricate other fake scienctific target such as global warming hoax to keep getting taxpayers' money.

Useless university is thinking only about making money, "selling meaningless books, interfering with "politics" to thwart Brexit, controlling politicians, stuck in endless fruitless debate about "probability".

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Einstein dream is realized ?

[ 'Theory of everything'  'Elegant universe'  is fantasy ? ]

(F-1)  ↓ Extradimensions, unreal virtual particles are  

Einstein long-cherished dream has finally come true ?

How elegant is it ?  It consists of many fantasy parallel worlds like Alice ?
Universe is extra-dimensional, which Einstein pictured ?

Einstein dream = reconciling wacky quantum mechanics with general relativity is baffling and fictional.  Why ?

Let's look back on history to find the reason why the current physics become so weird and counter-intuitive.

In the early 20th century, Dirac combined quantum mechanics and special relativity to form quantum field theory, which later developed into QED.

You may have seen boring catchphrase "this QED is the most successful theory !" somewhere.  But if it is so successful, why does nobody know or use QED in our daily lives ?  ← very strange.

In fact, all of you are deceived and "shut off" from true scientific information by the media and academia.  ← Truth is ugly, not elegant.

QED loses touch with reality.  Its particles, electrons and photons (= light ? ) are just nonphysical math symbols with No physical figure ( this p.12 ).

Why do physicists give up using realistic particles with tangible shape ?  Instead, they accept intangible math as unrealistic quantum particles ?

Einstein relativity has very strict rule where there is No 'absolute' space.  All things must be 'relative', which means you always see the 'same scene' no matter how fast you move !

So if each particle has its unique figure and speed, its motion looks different, seen by observers moving at different speeds, which is Not allowed in Einstein world.

In Einstein world, when you prepare a particle, this particle must appear in all possible positions at all possible speeds at the same time with No concrete figure.

If so, you can always see the same scene of infinite particles which always include all kinds of speeds and positions, seen by any observers.

This strange world is impossible to describe by real objects, and this is why No realistic particle picture appears in relativistic quantum field theory ( this p.12 ).  You must dismiss reality to satisfy Einstein strict rule.

Einstein rejected space 'medium'.  Instead, unreal virtual particles must pop up out of nothing like magic to exert force.  This virtual particle has imaginary negative mass.

Because a real electron cannot emit a real photon to conserve energy and momentum ( this p.6 ), which is the most unrealistic nature of QED.

Interaction between electron and photon can be expressed only as nonphysical abstract Feynman diagram which tells us nothing about detailed mechanism of physical reaction.

The problem is all calculation results of QED always diverge to infinity by these unreal virtual particles, which has No practical application.

Why is the physics so miserable ?  Because as I said, there is No absolute space in Einstein fantasy world.  Any observers must see the same scene regardless of their motions.

In real world, when you see a particle moving at some speed, this particle appears to be moving at a different speed or stop seen by observers moving at different speeds from you.

This situation is Not allowed in Einstein world where all particles must appear to be moving at the same speed and energy seen by any observers moving at arbitrary speeds !

So Einstein space must contain infinite virtual particles moving at infinite kinds of different speeds from infinity to minus infinity !

When you drive a car across the desert, you see "sand dunes" moving in the opposite direction from the window.

The faster you drive a car, the faster the sand dunes pass you, which 'passing' speed depends on your car's speed.  This real world scene is inconsistent with Einstein world.

"Einstein desert" must contain infinite "sand dunes" moving at all possible speeds in all directions, so you always see the same set of "moving sand dunes", no matter how fast or slow you drive a car.

It's like in Alice fantasy land, infinite card soldiers are always moving at all possible speeds around you.  The difference is the sand dune and card soldier have their tangible "figures", virtual particles have No real figure.

When these infinite virtual particles with "infinite energies" surround a real particle, its physical result becomes "infinity" by integrating Feynman diagram ( this p.4, this p.39 ).

To cancel these infinite virtual particles, the bare charge and mass of the real particle must be also negative infinity ( this p.4 ).  ← impossible !

This artificial, ad hoc method is called "renormalization" where "infinite" virtual particles are cancelled by "negative-infinite" real particles to get observed "finite" values.  ← too good to be true !

Differnt from fake news of "the most successful theory", this QED renormalization artificially removing infinity is unphysical and useless, cannot predict any physical values.

Even founders Dirac and Feynman criticized this QED as "hocus-pocus" or "stopgap" method, because they knew this QED is useless, lacks reality.

Subtracting infinity (= bare charge ) from infinity (= virtual particles ) to get finite value is nonsense and wrong math.

You cannot divide infinity into another infinity and finite values, because infinity is "limitless" and indivisible by finite value.

No matter what finite value is removed from infinity, this infinity remains infinite.  By using this trick, QED can get any artificial values as you like.

So "QED is the most successful theory !" is a total lie.  QED is nothing but a wrong math trick to pull out some finite physical value from infinite virtual particles, which cannot predict any values.  ← unphysical ( this p.3 )

If you set some upper limit of virtual particle's energy (= cut-off ), it disagrees with Einstein world, and this upper limit is considered as "freely-adjustable parameter", which cannot predict anything, either.

This Einstein quantum world must always include infinite virtual particles with all possible energies, which is physically useless and meaningless.

So physicists were forced to fabricate "fictitious target" to develop their nonphysical theory.  One of these fictitious targets is "symmetry".

They artificially created unphysical "gauge (or phase ) transformation".  If virtual particles look the same under this gauge transformation, it is called "gauge symmetry".  This gauge has nothing to do with real world.

The relativistic quantum field theory requires the entire equation and particles look the same under Lorentz transformation (= look the same seen by any observers moving at different speeds ).

Other ad hoc transformations such as gauge and supersymmetric transformations are just false analogies of this Lorentz transformation, though they have No link to reality, No physical evidence. = just a nonphysical tool to develop their ad hoc theory where meaningless "analogy" is everything.

There are three versions: a photon, a weak boson and quarks are expressed by this unphysical gauge symmetry, and if its mass term breaks this symmetry, this is called Higgs mechanism ( this p.4 )

All these theories are empty and illusion, developed only inside physicists' head.

When they transform fermions (= electron ) into virtual bosons (= selectron ? ) or vice versa, it is called "supersymmetry".  This transformation is also artificial, irrelevant to our real world.

Einstein dream = superstring including quantum physics, general relativity and supersymmetry needs fantasy extra-dimensions.  This theory is just a nonphysical math with No tangible physical objects.

These string and supersymmetry theories have many freely-adjustable parameters, so cannot predict any physical values,  completely useless.

These current useless physics forced physicists to make many fake science such as black hole and waste their time in meaningless paradox forever.

Global warming is also one of these fake science for academia to get research funds from taxpayers' money.

Students tend to be 'victims' of fake science of problematic educational industiry and politicial power game around global warming scam.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

What is  "Higgs" ?

[ Higgs 'pervades' space like 'sticky liquid' or molasses ? ]

(H-1)  ↓ Higgs gives mass, like molasses, crowds or God ?  

Almost everybody on the earth knows Higgs is called "God particle", and won prestigious Nobel prize, because all newspaper and the media repeatedly reported it.

But how many of you can answer the question "What is Higgs ?" or "How does Higgs give mass to other particles ?"  ← Almost nobody can answer.

This is strange.  If Higgs is 'science', the media should explain more about its 'scientific mechanism' to ordinary people  than 'God' or prize.

It indicates all of you are 'shut off' by the media and academia from true scientific information ?  They try to make you ignorant ?

The current physical theory such as Higgs has Not changed for 100 years.  Why almost all of you are still ignorant of Higgs ?  They try to hide unrealistic science from you ?

Epstein uncanny death is still scientifically illogical.
Epstein had powerful connections in the media, academia and politicians.

His dark science and green new deal are impossible thanks to the current unrealistic physics such as extradimension and parallel worlds which Epstein supported.

Global warming is fake.  The world is getting colder which already affected summer sports.

Carbon tax pushed by globalist elites will just enrich climate change politicians and corrupt academia using taxpayers' money.

How does Higgs give mass to particles ?  Higgs is like sticky molasses, swimming pool or spider's web which slow down particles moving through them ?

Higgs is like 'party-goers' crowding around a big star (= particle ? ), and the star cannot move which means a particle gains mass ?

All these analogy is nonsense, contradictory, and cannot describe reality.

If a particle such as a electron always "feels resistance" from the surrounding 'sticky' Higgs pool, it quickly slows down and stops, falling into nucleus in atoms.   But such a thing doesn't occur.

A photon (= a particle of light ) is said to have no mass.  How can the photon pass through sticky Higgs pool without touching it, though the photon can touch other paticles such as electron ?

Einstein rejected "medium" (= ether ).  "Higgs pool" filling space contradicts Einstein ?  Why can dark matter or virtual particles pass through "Higgs sticky molasses" without being affected ?

As you see, the current physics is full of self-contradictions, and cannot answer these questions.

To know how Higgs interacts with other particles, we need to know the exact "shape" of Higgs.  What is the shape and size of a Higgs particle ?

Higgs is like colorful marbles,  strings,  a crystal ball,  almighty god, or music ?  ← Different news use different Higgs pictures, which means all these pictures are fake.

How is such a strange thing happening in science news ?
Let's go back to the early 20th century when quantum mechanics was born.

Physicists couldn't calculate the exact trajectory of multi-electrons inside atoms due to the lack of computers 100 years ago.

So they invented unrealistic quantum mechanics which only shows vague electron cloud, giving up real motion and trajectory of a particle.

Giving up real particles means physicists stopped thinking about the shape and size of an electron and photon which are expressed only as nonphysical math symbols (= a, b, c .. ) with No concrete figure.

This nonphysical property makes the current quantum physics useless.
In condensed matter, all physicists can do is increase fictitious quasiparticles to explain various physical phenomena in vain.

All other particles such as Higgs ( this p.4 ), quarks and weak boson are also just nonphysical math objects with No physical shape.

Molasses, liquid and party-goers have their 'shape', but Higgs has No shape.  So these are 'bad' Higgs analogies.  It's like explaining ghost by real human.

The mechanism of 'Higgs giving mass' is also expressed only as nonphysical abstract math which tells us nothing about how Higgs distinguishes other particles, touches some of them and penetrates the others in detail.

Interaction between Higgs and other particles is expressed just by putting nonphysical math letters side by side ( this p.11 )  ← Neither picture of Higgs molasses nor partygoers appears here.  These Higgs pictures are all fake.

How did the current particle physics become so unrealistic and miserable ?
It originates from the fact that quantum mechanics can describe each particle Not as real things but as abstract math without physical figure.

In real materials, many electrons are moving around, interacting with other particles and lights dynamically, causing various reactions real time.

If physicists can describe each particle only as an abstract math with No concrete shape, they have to give up explaining various phenomena using real particles moving and interacting with each other.

But physicists had to continue their research to get research funds and promotion, even if they knew their physics failed to describe reality.  So they fabricated some "fictitious target" to develop their nonphysical theory.

This fictitious target is so-called "symmetry".

In the early 20th century, Dirac combined quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity to create "quantum field theory", which is just abstract math where each particle has No physical shape ( this p.12 ), this theory lost touch with reality.

Physicists introduced artificial unphysical concepts " gauge" or "phase".  When the entire equation is unchanged (= invariant ) by this artificial gauge ( phase ) transformation, it is called "gauge symmetry".

This quantum field theory is Not physics.  Its math is Not to describe reality.

There are three versions:  No matrix called U(1) symmetry represents a photon.  2 × 2 matrix called SU(2) symmetry is weak boson.  3 × 3 matrix called SU(3) symmetry is quarks ( this p.8 ).

If a particle has mass ( term ), this symmetry is broken, which is called "Higgs mechanism ( this p.4 )".  This is just an artificial nonsense rule which does Not represent real world.

Higgs is very rare and hard to detect like 'finding a needle in haystacks'. Only one collision per trillions of collisions produces Higgs ?

Higgs itself cannot be seen.  Physicists just "imagine" illusory Higgs by seeing many other irrelevant particles into which Higgs quickly decays ?

If Higgs is so rare and unstable, Higgs cannot form stable "molasses" filling space to constantly give mass to other particles.  In fact, Higgs inside collider has nothing to do with this "sticky molasses" giving mass.

The media tends to hide this inconvenient fact that Higgs field giving mass around us is undetectable.  Higgs particle or boson inside LHC does Not give mass, because it's Not Higgs field, so still No evidence of 'Higgs giving mass'.

Massive weak boson and fractional-charge quarks (= Gell-Mann is Epstein's friend ? ) are also just illusion, have nothing to do with real world phenomena such as beta decay.

Actually, all these doubtful particles such as Higgs are still useless for us except for getting Nobel prize or wasting huge taxpayers' money in meaningless colliders like illusory black hole and gravitational wave.

Quantum field theory and QED are just ad-hoc, unrealistic theory.
They claim infinite unreal virtual particles surround real particles, so their calculation results always become "infinity".

To cancel this infinity, the bare charge and mass of a real particle must be "negative infinity ( this p.4 )" where physicists must artificially remove infinity from infinity to get small finite values by renormalization.

Even founders Dirac and Feynman criticized this QED renormalization method as 'hocus-pocus' or 'stop-gap' procedure.

Higgs itself has its mass which also becomes infinity by these unreal virtual particles.

Instead of canceling this infinity by unnatural renormalization or fine-tuning parameters, physicists introduced ad-hoc 'supersymmetry' where virtual bosons and fermions cancel each other to reduce Higgs mass to real level ?

But this "supersymmetry" is also unrealistic math ( this p.11 ) including No real concepts except fantasy extradimension.  Supersymmetry can freely adjust many artificial parameters, so meaningless and useless theory.

Higgs mass is called "Hierarchy" or "naturalness" problem which has nothing to do with our real world, so its debate and study are just a waste of time.

Supersymmetry also requires that the entire equation be unchanged by artificial "supersymmetric transformation" which is said to change boson into fermion or vice versa.

Quantum mechanics stopped treating each particle as a real physical object a long time ago, and this abnormal situation has continued even now in science world.

Physicists had to fabricate many nonphysical concepts such as quasiparicle, virtual-particle, symmetry and Higgs mechanism to develop their ad hoc theory, though these are irrelevant to real world.

Actually, we can live without knowing God particle, which is just 'fairy-tale'.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Truth of  uncertainty principle.

[ Science is "uncertain" forever.  → No more progress ? ]

(U-1)  ↓ Uncertainty principle to hide unreal quantum world ?  

Heisenberg uncertainty principle is one of weird quantum phenomena where you can never know precice motion of a particle, no matter how perfect instrument you use ?

Science can make No more progress ?  It is just fantasy or philosophy ?  It is related to "not empry" vacuum ?  Certain or uncertain ?  Einstein didn't believe it.

Quantum mechanics is unrealistic and hard to believe, like Epstein rare and mysterious death.

Epstein shone a light on hypocritical academia's fake science such as parallel worlds,  quantum computer  and global warming hoax.  ← Some dark, big deep state is involved in it ?

It is about time we woke up to "reality", freed from illusion fabricated by the media and academia.

An electron and a proton attract each other by electric force.
So if there was only electromagnetic force, an electron could easily fall into a nucleus (= proton ) and stick to it forever.

Some other repulsive force is working ?  But quantum mechanics hates to use "real force", instead, they introduced weird uncertainty principle which keeps an electron from approaching a nucleus ?

But this explanation is contradictory.  Quantum mechanics includes zero orbital angular momentum which means an electron always crashes into a nucleus.

In some cases, an electron can stick to a nucleus.  Quantum uncertainty principle is silent about the detailed mechanism of what's going on inside an atom,  just showing "uncertain" electron cloud.

An electron also shows "wave nature" of de Broglie wave which interference was experimentally confirmed.  Planck constant h is the common concept both in de Broglie wavelength and uncertainty principle.

Interference is the result of avoiding destructive inteference of matter wave.  Bohr's orbit gives the exact energies and radius using this de Broglie wave interference.

Schrödinger equation also uses de Broglie wave, and gives the same result as Bohr model where Bohr radius is the most probable electron's location in quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanics never admits de Broglie wave to be a real wave, instead, they changed the concept of wave into vague "probability density".

So the probability density of Heisenberg uncertainty principle is equal to de Broglie wave of the electron.   ← This is the truth.

Actually, quantum mechanics uses the same mechanism where an electron orbit is an integer times de Broglie wavelength, avoiding its destructive interference, which is why both quantum and classical models give the same exact energies in hydrogen ( this last ).

Why does quantum mechanics firmly refuse to accept real de Broglie wave ?  Instead, they choose weirder and vaguer uncertatinty principle which gives No concrete experimental values.

In hydrogen-like atoms, as the nuclear charge increases ( H → He+ ), the electron's radius decreases and its velocity increases.  ← This is the consequence of uncertainty principle ?  No.  These atomic precise energy and radius were given by de Broglie theory, Not by uncertainty vague principle.

When water wave passes through narrower slit, the wave becomes more circular, spreads over larger area.  This is called "diffraction" and its pattern is explained just by interference of waves.

But quantum mechanics obstinately refuses to use "real wave".  Instead, they rely on vague uncertainty principle where the narrower the slit width is, the more uncertain the wave's momentum becomes.  So it spreads over larger area ?

All phenomena such as light interference, refraction and diffraction agree with the fact that light is wave traveling through some medium.

But quantum mechanics and Einstein cannot admit light "medium", instead, they want to use a nonphysical photon which needs fantasy parallel worlds in two-slit interference.

Without "medium", physicists have to use illusory virtual particles with negative mass which pop up from nothing thanks to uncertainty principle, as force.

So the weird uncertainty principle is the consequence of the current physics which rejects real wave such as light and de Broglie wave traveling through some medium.

Light wave always travels at constant speeed in the same medium.  An electron can slow down or stop, which shows an electron is a particle moving and causing a ripple of de Broglie wave in the surrounding medium.

It is impossible for each particle to be both wave and particle at once.  This "undecided" attitude of the current physics clearly prevents our science from advancing forever.  = Still mystery.

The idea that each electron is a particle moving and generating de Broglie wave in the medium is very realistic and rational.

But treating an electron as a real moving particle needs modern computers to calculate their trajectory in multi-electron atoms.  It is "three-body problem".

In the early 20th century, physicists had to give up real classical atomic model in multi-electron helium due to the lack of computers.

This is why they introduced nonphysical "quantum wavefunction" which cannot include a real electron moving at some point at some definite speed.

If even an electron cannot be considered as a real particle, realistic de Broglie wave caused by the electron must be abandoned, too.

They artificially changed the concept of "de Broglie wave" into vague "probability density" of uncertainty principle which tells us nothing about the detailed mechanism inside atoms, useless forever.

The current physics is Not science but "literature" to sell many meaningless books with slightly different titles repeatedly talking about the same old history.  ← No progress.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Electron spin  is uncanny.

[ Spin is Not a real spinning ?  But the spin cannot stop ? ]

(S-1)  ↓ Quantum spin is unrealistic.  

Electron spin is uncanny.  The spin has angular momentum, but is Not a real "spinning" ?   How could such an illogical thing happen ?

Furthermore, the electron spin cannot stop or slow down no matter how many times the electron collides with other particles.  ← impossible !

How can such an unrealistic science survive for 100 years ?
The current science is not a fact ?
Some very powerful, dark force controls and distorts the academia ?

Epstein uncanny death is also related to some "dark power" ?
The truth is still unknown.

Epstein showed strange connection between politicians, academia and Hollywood.

Science is very lucrative, even if it is fake science such as parallel worlds, extradimension, BigBang and black hole .. all of which are still useless.

Academia uses the media and Hollywood to brainwash people, pressure governments into wasting huge taxpayers' money in useless telescope, collider, satellites and quantum computer AI.  = deep state ?

Let's go back to the "spin".  Electron spin is very creepy, unrealistic and scary,  the spin is one of the main factors which prevent our science from progressing forever.

100 years ago, we had No convenient PC.  Academia panicked, because they couldn't use a real, then-standard, atomic model where electrons are moving and avoiding each other rationally to compute three-body helium atom.

They sold their soul to uncanny quantum mechanics where an electron spreads as uncertain cloud which is the origin of fantasy parallel worlds.

The problem is quantum mechanical atoms must always include unrealistic zero angular momentum where electrons collide with nucleus unnaturally ?

A hydrogen atom has magnetic field which agrees with Bohr magneton of Bohr's classical model.  So physicists assumed this artificial spin also has Bohr magneton (= too good to be true ! ) and angular momentum.

More problems happened.  An electron is very tiny.  So each electron must spin faster-than-light to generate the observed magnetic field.

To avoid this contradiction, physicists started to say an electron has spin angular momentum, but it is Not really spinning ( this p.4 ) !  ← impossible and illegal !

Angular momentum is defined as "rotation" or "spinning" as seen in a soccer ball.  If an electron is Not spinning, its spin angular mometum must be zero instead of 1/2.

Furthermore, the electron spin must rotate 720o ( instead of 360o ) to return to its original state like magic.  ← it's impossible to imagine this electron spin.

All we can observe is magnetic field, Not spin itself.  Stern-Gerlach experiment just measured magnetic field of a neutral atom (= Not a free electron ), which can be explained also by Bohr's classical orbit ( this p.4 ).   = unlawful spin is unneeded.

Very small energy splitting in hydrogen called fine structure is said to prove this uncanny "spin".  But this is fake news.

This energy splitting was first predicted by Bohr-Sommerfeld model.  Later nonphysical quantum mechanics got the same result as Sommerfeld using unreal spin ( this last )

Anomalous Zeeman effect is said to be another evidence of spin.  This is fake news, too.  One-electron hydrogen atom shows "normal" Zeeman effect, which means complicated anomalous Zeeman energy splitting of larger atoms is caused by "inner electrons", Not by unreal spin.

Electron's spin magnetic energy is too weak to explain big energy splitting in large atoms such as sodium and magnesium.  Those large energy splittings are thought to be caused by strong Coulomb energy by inner electrons, Not by weak spin.

This electron spin magnetic energy is too small to cause any other visible phenomena.  So the original definition of spin (= magnet ) is meaningless and negligible ( this p.7  this p.5 ).

So physicists introduced new nonphysical artificial "exchange energy" besides ordinary electromagnetic energy ( this p.9, this p.20 ).

This spin "exchange energy" is spooky and eerie.  Only "exchange energy" exists.  There is No "exchange force" !  So you can't calculate "exchange force" like ordinary electromagnetic force !

Pauli exclusion principle, ferromagnet, singlet-triplet are said to be caused by this uncanny "exchange energy" Not by electromagnetic energy.

This "exchange force" is Not a real force.
There is No physical interpretation of this exchange energy ( this p.6, this p.3 )
Only "energy" exists, and No real force ?  How such a weird thing is possible ?

We can measure electromagnetic force as a real force.
We can also measure Pauli exclusion force as a real force even at atomic scale.

But there is No concept of "force" in quantum mechanics, which can only deal with "fake energy", Not forces.  So even if you measure atomic forces, useless quantum mechanics cannot describe them !  It prevents us from advancing science.

Pauli principle is expressed as nonphysical antisymmetric wavefunction where exchanging two electron's labels (= 1 and 2 ) changes the sign of the wavefunction.

Just preparing such a wavefunction is Not enough to express Pauli principle.  We need to "integrate" such an antisymmetric wavefunction to generate spooky Pauli exchange energy ( this p.14,  this p.13 ).

This calculation method of Pauli principle disagrees with the original quantum mechanics and causes serious problem making the current physics useless forever.

One-electron hydrogen atom has the exact solution, which means we just solve Schrödinger equation without integrating it in hydrogen atom.

Multi-electron atoms have No exact solution, so physicists cannot solve the Schrödinger equation, instead, they resort to rough approximation of choosing fake solution and integrating it, which just gives fake energy.

If multi-electron atoms also had exact solution, we just solve them without integrating, which invalidates Pauli principle, because it generates No energy difference between symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions.

So this strange Pauli exchange energy appears only when Schrödinger equation has No exact solution where the "integral" gives energy difference between symmetric and antisymemtric wavefunctions, which "energy difference" is Pauli exchange energy.

But No exact solution means quantum mechanics is wrong.

As long as we depend on this spin Pauli principle, the only calculation way is to "integrate fake wavefunction" which cannot give any physical meaning or compute actual forces, so useless forever.

The spin is the largest obstacle for development of science by restricting our calculation method to inconvenient "integral".  You cannot use ordinary method of calculating "force" as real force as long as you use quantum mechanical spin.

The quantum method of choosing fake solutions out of infinite choices, adjusting parameters and integrating them is useless, meaningless (= just gives fake exchange energy, No force ) and takes a lot of time.

So in solid-physics, physicists just treat the whole solid as one fictitious quasi-electron with fake (= effective ) mass and charge.

The electron with "spin" is expressed only as nonphysical math symbol (= a, b, c ) with No physical shape ( this p.5 ).  = the detailed mechanism of spin is unclear forever.

Uncanny Pauli exchange interaction is expressed as nonphysical anticommutation relation which gives No physical meaning No detailed mechanism.

Surprisingly, this miserable basic physics has survived for 100 years underground, and almost nobody knows the current physics is filled with such old and nonphysical concepts due to fake news controlled by dark, large political power = academia, university.

Different from the media-hype "heatwave, gobal warming !",  the cold weather damages crop and drink sale.  = Do you smell some "fishy" plot behind it ?

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Why Einstein can't play golf  ?

[ You can't hit a ball in the current physics = No real force ? ]

(V-1)  ↓ Quantum and Einstein physics lack reality.  

Tiger Woods made a great comback, and won Masters recently.
Einstein didn't play golf.  Why ?  He just disliked golf ?

In fact, playing "real" golf is impossible in Einstein physics.
To play golf, you have to hit a ball with a club, which needs "force".

Surprisingly, the current Einstein and quantum physics cannot define "real" forces or shape of each golf club.  You probably don't know this shocking fact.  You are deceived by fake news.

Each golf club has its unique shape, and a ball is globe-shaped.
You need to pick an appropriate club to hit the ball in different directions.

But the current physics cannot give definite "shape" to each particle.
What is the shape of a photon (= a particle of light ) ?

A photon is an electromagnetic wave, so wave-shaped ?
A photon is a particle, fireball or like a cat living in parallel worlds ?

A photon can be both a particle and a wave, or Not ?
After all, a photon has No shape ?

Different science news use different pictures of a photon or a light, which means these images are all fake.

Each shape can change from triangle into square, but cannot be both triangle and square at the same time.  So quantum mechanical claim that each particle can be both a particle and a wave is physically impossible.

Einstein rejected "medium", so the space must be empty.
To explain electromagnetic force, physicists have to rely on unreal virtual photons with imaginary mass which pop up from nothing ?

The present quantum field theory only shows abstract, nonphysical Feynman diagram to express all forces, which tells us nothing about detailed mechanism of how each electron is attracted or repelled by other charged particles.

The current physics describes each electron and photon as nonphysical math symbols (= a, b, c .. ) with No physical shape ( this p.6 ).

So these colorful pictures are all fake.  You cannot give definite shape to golf clubs or hit a ball with real force in Einstein and quantum physics !

Our universe is 10-dimensional ?  All particles can split into "string" ?  But imaging unreal extradimensional string is impossible.  The media and physicists blatantly lie to laypersons by fake images.

Actually, those string and extra-dimension are illusion, just nonphysical math objects with No concrete shape ( this p.19,  this p.19 )

We can "touch" a golf ball.  But the current physics says we cannot "touch" objects.  This is self-contradictory, and makes No sense.

Each electron is said to have "spin".  Everybody knows these spin pictures are unreal.  Spin is Not actually "arrow-shaped".  "Arrow" is just for science news.

Electron spin is unrealistic.  A tiny electron has to rotate faster-than-light to generate observed magnetic field.  So physicists dismissed "real picture" of spin, and say the spin is Not a real spinning though it has angular momentum.  ← self-contradiction, again.

Pauli principle besides electromagnetic force is needed to consider forces in golf.  You cannot walk through walls due to this Pauli principle which exerts strong repulsive force and kicks out the 3rd lithium electron to outer orbital.

Even at an atomic scale, Pauli exclusion force can be measured as an actual force, which is stronger than Coulomb attraction at short range ( this p.2 ).

The problem is quantum mechanics cannot admit this Pauli repulsion to be a real force.  There is No physical reality in this Pauli principle ( this p.6 ).

Pauli principle just says when two electrons (= wavefunction or math symbol ) are exchanged, the total sign becomes the opposite.  This is an abstract, nonphysical reason.  No more detailed explanation.

Particles, forces have No physical reality, No shape in the current physics.
How can physicists explain various physical phenomena using this miserable physics ?

All physicists can do is increase fictitious quasiparticles to explain all phenomena such as metal, molecule, semiconductor, biology and solar cell.

Unreal quasiparticle can have negative mass, fractional-charge and can even split an electron.  ← impossible !

And they fabricated many fictional patricles such as weak boson, quarks and supersymmetric particles to describe neutron and nuclear reaction, dark matter, giving up explaining them using only existing real electrons and nuclei.

Those fictional particles are too unstable to be detected directly, and still useless, just wasting taxpayers' money in expensive particle colliders.

Electron spin has magnetic field.  It's impossible to express Pauli principle by this "spin", because quantum mechanics says Pauli principle is Not a force such as electric or magnetic force.

Spin magnetic field is too weak to cause strong Pauli repulsion.  And more than two electron spins (= up, down, diagonal .. ) can be in the same place along the spin magnetic line, if only electromagnetic force is working.  So Pauli principle needs other things.

If Einstein is right and the space is empty except particles such as electrons, there is No way to express Pauli principle as real force, because the empty space contains No other real things.

If the space is Not empty, and contains some real things as "medium", we can use it as a tool to generate real Pauli exclusion force.  Real force needs some "tangible" things.

Suppose we make some "atomic models" with concrete physical shapes using tangible clay or playdough based on measured forces of each atomic surface.

In the current physics with empty space, No such tools are available to express actual forces.  If you try to make some models or shapes using tools like clay or playdough, those tools are unavailable from the beginning in the current quantum and Einstein physics.

"Real medium" in space is necessary as a tool like a clay to prepare a realistic atomic model with a tangible physical shape which you can touch and feel actual force.

Without "medium", we have to accept fantasy parallel worlds where a single photon can interfere with itself, and virtual particles pop up from nothing.

All phenomena such as light interferece and refraction show the light is a wave traveling through "medium" at constant speed like sound wave, Not a particle.

For a single electron to cause interference, some "external things" (= medium ) need to affect the electron's motion.  Without medium, No interference would be seen, No limitation in an electron orbit. = the electron radius can be arbitrary.

Actually, the electron orbital radius or energy is discrete at definite (= Not arbitrary ) values to avoid destructive interference of de Broglie wave, feeling "pressure" from the surrounding medium.

So this medium causing de Broglie wave can be used as a tool like clay and playdough to prepare real atomic shape and forces including Pauli exclusion principle.

Destructive interference of electrons' de Broglie waves can exert strong repulsion enough to cause Pauli exclusion force.  An electron must cross the opposite-phase orbit of another electron's wave "perpendicularly" to avoid destructive interference.

But when the atom contains too many orbits, all electrons cannot cross other electron's opposite-phase orbit one-to-one perpendicularly = some electrons must be parallel to other electron's opposite phase which causes destructive interference of de Broglie waves and kicks out the electrons.  ← 'real' Pauli exclusion force.

Quantum mechanics gave up real electrons' motion inside an atom, and just shows uncertain electron cloud spreading all space.

This quantum electron cloud model is valid only in one-electron hydrogen.  In multi-electrons atoms, electrons cannot avoid each other or conserve total energy, which dispoves quantum mechanics.

We cannot describe correct atomic behavior in the current quantum physics which dismissed real tools a long time ago and remains useless.  It prevents us from advancing or curing diseases forever.

Prizes are used as a false incentive to get research funds for unreal science such as extra-dimensional supergravity, fake global warming and useless AI .

Weird quantum physics is Not science but "literature" to sell books and stick to old history forever.  ← No progress.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Einstein is really right  ?

[ Quantum mechanics is true ?  But nobody uses it. ]

(E-1)  ↓ We are "brainwashed" by fake news, science. →  

Science is constantly advancing.
Technology is progressing day by day.
The current accepted theory has passed all tests ?

Everybody believes so.  Because there are many scientists in the world.
Some of them may always check and progress science somewhere .. ?

What if we are just "brainwashed" into thinking so ?
What if the current mainstream science is fake, and makes No progress ?

Who benefits from doing such weird things ?
Those who control the basic science can get huge taxpayers' money from the world's science budgets by protecting their vested interests and old science.

If academia such as universities and journals judges something to be "science", it becomes "mainstream science", even if it is unreal and useless.  They reject all other theories as "heretic" like church did to Galileo.

Academia backed by 100-year-old science has bigger political power than anyone else on the earth to control all the media and brainwash us into believing fake science as if it were real.

Trump fake collusion started from academic professors ?  They push political opponent = Clinton, intervened in presidential election, Brexit, and Kavanaugh hearing.

Even Nobel laureates and physics professors spread fake Russian collusion, indicate "academic deep state".  Coincidentally, their mainstream physics such as extradimension and parallel worlds also lacks reality.

The media and academia exaggerate only "heat wave" of fake global warming, intentionally ignore record-cold temperature damaging crop.

Quantum mechanics is the most successful theory ?
But nobody knows "how fast an electron spins" "what shape of a photon" in quantum physics.

Almost nobody knows how to calculate atoms ( ex. helium ) using quantum mechanics or virtual photons of QED even after graduating from university.  It means quantum mechanics is useless, Not used in our daily lives, different from the media-hype.

You probably don't know the current physics has to explain all material such as metal, semiconductor, solar cell and biology using unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge.

Because you are deceived by fake images of science news every day.
Quantum mechanics is a very old theory invented 100 years ago. Of course, there were No modern computers then.

Many electrons are moving and interacting inside material.  How could physicists at that time compute those complicated many electrons' behavior without computers ?  Impossible.

So they had to rely on ad-hoc fake quasiparticle model.  Each time they faced different physical phenomena, new unreal quasiparticle models were invented to explain it, instead of using real dynamic electrons which needed computer power.

Even the present condensed matter physics uses unreal quasiparticles, which is called "band theory" which is very rough approximation, treats the whole metal as if it were a single big quasi-electron with fake (= effective ) mass.

Instead of estimating real electrons' various motions, physicists adjust fake effective mass of a fake quasi-particle as free parameters.  This illusory effective mass can be negative or change in different directions.

So this quantum mechanics relying on fake quasiparticle with freely-adjustable parameters cannot predict anything, it is Not successful, it's just fake model.

Once this old quasiparticle model is establised and deep rooted in the current physics in the last 100 years, it is very difficult to abolish and replace it with real electron model even after we got modern computers. = physicists stop pursuing real atomic picture !

"Computer transistor and smartphone use quantum mechanics ?" is blatant fake news.  Transistor is said to utilize two quantum properties, band theory and tunnel.

The band theory is, as I said, equal to unreal quasiparticle model with fake freely-adjustable mass and parameters = No ability to predict anything, completely useless model except for publishing science journals.

Quantum tunnel is Not occult at all.  Only when the gap such as vacuum (= large empty space ) is very thin (= ~nm ) and voltage is applied, some electrons can go through this thin gap.  It is natural phenomenon, Not ghost-like.

We blindly believe "quantum mechanics is almighty", though this old theory just fiddles with fictional quasiparticles.  Almost none of you probably knew this shocking fact until you read this website, because all the media hides it, trying to make useless quantum physics look useful.

All living things, human body are still unknown mystery.  Many diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer, HIV are still incurable.  Because the old quantum mechanics which we believe as "cure-all" is completely helpless in molecular behavior inside our body.

"Einstein is right, again !"  You may often see such fake news.
What does "a theory is right" mean ?

For example, when some symptom such as fever appears, you need differential diagnosis = trying several different tests to identify what the disease is.
Just repeating the same kind of tests ( ex. take temperature ) is meaningless.

Einstein says a moving clock or gravity slows down a clock time like magic.
The only practical use of this Einstein time dilation is said to be GPS.

The problem is this Einstein relativistic effect is too small.
GPS clock is changed only by 38 microseconds per day due to Einstein effect ?
There are many other time error sources ( ex. atmosphere ) than Einstein.

Then, physicists made "differential diagnosis" to eliminate all other possibilities except Einstein ?  No.  If they could really do it, we could've already controlled clock times and invented time-machine.  In fact, GPS does Not need Einstein.

They just estimate GPS time error using other artificial models ( mixing all effects ) whose parameters must be updated real time, compared to ground station ( this p.22, this p.20 ), so small Einstein effect is hidden in it and meaningless, even if it was real.

In fact, we can disprove Einstein time dilation without more tests.
Einstein theory causes twin paradox where a moving clock seen by another clock ticks slower.

When both satellites A and B are moving in the same orbit (= the same gravitational potential, so No gravitational time dilation ) in the opposite direction, both satellites are moving seen by another sattelite, so both clocks tick slower than each other.. = paradox !

The recent study also says "Einstein was right again !"  Really ?
They claim some star called S2 is orbiting around black hole in galactic center, and experiences gravitational time dilation, emits redshifted light ?

The problem is we cannot see this star or black hole because the galactic center is covered by a thick cloud of dusts which blocks visible light.  They just "imagine" this fictional star's motion from nonspecific infrared light or something.

Furthermore, this "imaginary" star orbit is unnatural.  This star becomes irregularly slower and faster.  If its orbit was real, the star must be gradually faster approaching black hole.

It means this Einstein test is fake.  Actually this study uses freely-adjustable orbital parameters, which cannot predict anything ( this p.7 ).
There are many other big factors (= dusts, classical Doppler .. ) than Einstein, which affect light wavelength in space.

Astronomers always jump to the conclusion (= Einstein is right ? ) without trying different tests for "differential diagnosis", because black holes are too far away to try other realistic tests for.

"Gravity waves verify Einstein prediction ?" is fake news, too.
Gravitational wave is an unreal pseudo-tensor with freely adjustable parameters and models ( this p.5 ), contradicts Einstein, and cannot predict anything.

"Atomic bomb proved Einstein mc2" is fake news, too.  Nuclear energy is potential (= Not kinetic ) energy, which means "medium (= rejected by Einstein )" around particles has real mass changed by potential energy which was first shown by Maxwell.

Einstein copied Maxwell mc2 in the wrong way.  Einstein mass is illusion, "A mass can change freely by observer's motion ?"  Physicists still cannot show detailed mechanism of Einstein mass increase or time dilation.

The current physics is fraud.  They always say "Einstein and quantum mechanics are correct !" to reject other theories, but silent about the detailed mechanism of their current accepted theory, which attitude stops science from progressing.

It was impossible for old quantum mechanics to describe complicated atomic electrons' motions inside material only with a pen and paper without modern computers in 1920s.

So physicists at that time dismissed realistic atomic picture, and only showed vague electron cloud as atom where each electron and photon (= light ) are nothing but nonphysical math letters with No physical figure, which are still used now.

This is why nobody still can answer questions "what is the shape of a photon ?" or "how fast is an electron spinning ?" under the current unrealistic physics which gave up real particle images 100 years ago.

The current quantum field theory is very simple and lacks physical reality.  It can only express each particle as nonphysical math symbol (= a, b .. ) with No concrete shape.

There are two interactions = force and non-force (= Pauli exclusion principle ), which is expressed only as abstract nonphysical anticommutation ( this p.3 ).  They show No other detailed figures of Pauli principle ( this p.6 ).  = science stops.

All forces such as Coulomb, weak, quark-gluon and Higgs are expressed as unreal virtual particles with imaginary mass in simple Feynman diagram which is the only tool of the current particle physics.

All these unstable particles are undetectable in our real world, so illusion.  Physicists just "imagine" them by seeing irrelevant garbage or other particles inside artificial circumstances of colliders.

Actually the current standard model cannot show any physical figure or concrete mechanism except nonphysical math symbol as quark, weak boson, Higgs and supersymmetry (= dark matter ? )  So these colorful pictures are all fake.

This is why nobody can explain how Higgs gives mass or why dark matter strongly pushing the entire galaxy doesn't collide with us using real pictures.  "Realistic picture" itself is forbidden in the current quantum physics.

The most serious crime of academia is they repeat meaningless mantra that Einstein and quantum mechanics are right just to prohibit any other theories forever, while their mainstream theory stops clarifying deeper mechanism.  = Science makes No progress.

By stopping progress in basic science, academia desperately protects their "vested interests" = old science, useless university, pressures politicians, calls for open-border and debt-free college to increase students, subsidy and tuition.

Fake science such as AI, global warming, political correctness (= racism, sexism .. ) and human right are abused just as "political tools" for academia to get more taxpayers' money for their meaningless research.

Physicists focus only on selling books, stuck in endless debate of quantum interpretation, many-worlds or "shut up" in their blogs forever. = Waste of time, No progress.

It's about time we woke up from 100-year-old fake news, science and brought back reality to the basic science to solve all these issues and cure diseases.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Scientists stop  'questioning'  ?

[ Basic science has stopped progressing. ]

(P-1)  ↓ Apples fall from a tree. → gravity discovery =  

Archimedes discovered 'buoyant force' seeing water displaced from a tub.
Newton found gravity seeing apples falling from trees.

This is how the science developed.  When there are some unknown phenomena around us, we want to explore it, and discover new things.
This is our basic desire.

"Why would you want to climb Mount Everest ?"
"Because it's there."  George Mallory answered.

Seeing humans and animals being killed by some unknown pathogen, scientists discovered 'bacteria' which led to inventing antibiotics and saving many lives.  'Questioning' unknown things has surely benefited us.

Static electricity urged physicists to discover 'Coulomb force' and later 'electrons' which contribute to our daily life as battery and electric power.

Observing interference of light wave, scientists establised 'electromagnetic wave theory' which contributes to our communication as radio wave.

All of these 'discovered' things must be realistic and consistent with other existing theories to be useful for us.  We have to keep pursuing truth, as long as 'unknown' phenomena are around us.

This golden rule has broken since quantum mechanics and Einstein in 1920s, which is the start of 'death' of our science.

Quantum mechanics claims a light wave is also a particle called 'photon'.
What is the shape and size of a photon ?  Nobody can give a definite answer.

Quantum mechanics claims even a single photon can interfere with itself by passing through both two slits simultaneously using fantasy parallel worlds.

Quantum mechanics avoids detailed motion of electrons inside atoms.  It just shows vague 'electron cloud' where each electron can be everywhere at the same time like a dead and alive cat until we observe it.

Physicists try to explain this quantum mechanism by unreal parallel worlds or stop 'questioning' = 'Shut up and calculate !' in other interpretations.

Nobody understands weird quantum mechanics so far.  Then, physicist must keep searching for deeper truth.  This is 'science'.  Stopping pursuing truth is against scientific principle.

Why have physicists stopped 'questioning (= stop pursuing truth )' ?
Because if they try to explain physical phenomena using weird quantum mechanics, many contradictions happen.

It is impossible to explain light interference and refraction using a photon particle.  A photon can be slower and faster again exiting water ?  A photon particle is scattered in random directions in 'medium', which contradicts the fact that light is always bent at fixed angles in refraction which agrees with Huygens wave theory like sound wave.

Compton and photoelectric effects use "light wavelength" ( or frequency ) as energy, so they just prove a light ( or a photon ) is wave, Not a particle.

If light is a wave traveling through some 'medium', which actually affects light speed in refraction, it contradicts Einstein relativity.

Einstein said "motion" and "gravity" can slow clock time.  But physicists avoids detailed mechanism of this time dilation forever. = Science stops progressing.  If gravity really slows and stops the time, black hole or gravitational wave woud Not exist, it takes infinite time.  ← contradiction !

The current physics tries to explain this gravity using fictional extra-dimensions which is impossible to image.

Physicists try to explain 'real Coulomb force' using 'unreal virtual photons' with imaginary mass, because each electron cannot emit a real photon conserving both momentum and energy.

So when we explain physical phenomena using the current quantum physics, we are forced to encounter contradictory and unrealistic things, which make physicists stop 'questioning' about deeper mechanism.

There is a discrepancy between reality and the current theory which describes 'mountain' as if it were 'ocean'.  So if physicists climb the mountain, they find No ocean there, contradicting their theory !  To avoid this discrepancy, they stop climbing, stop pursuing truth.  = Science stops progressing.

Actually, the present quantum mechanics can only describe each electron and photon as nonphysical math symbols with No physical figure. = stop pursuing what the shape of a photon.  = Mystery forever. = No science progress.

"Quantum mechanics is the most successful theory ?" is fake news.
Quantum physics still relies on unreal quasiparticle with fake mass and charge to explain all phenomena such as semiconductor and biology.

Why cannot physicists break away from fake quasiparticles in condensed matter ?  Because quantum mechanics cannot express atomic behavior using real electrons.

Actually almost nobody knows how to calculate atoms (= ex. helium ) using quantum mechanics even after graduating from university.  It means quantum physics is useless for us and Not used in our daily lives.

Quantum mechanics has No exact solution except for one-electron hydrogen.  It just chooses fake solution with freely-adjustable parameters in ohter atoms and integrate it instead of solving it (= because it cannot solve ), which method just gives fake energy and cannot predict anything.

In larger solids, quantum mechanics treats the whole solid as a single fake quasi-electron ( this p.3 ) with fake (= effective ) mass and spin in approximate band model, which is just nonphysical, so meaningless.

So "quantum mechanics is used in modern computers ?" is fake news made up later to justify useless quantum physics.

Computer uses quantum tunnel ?  But quantum mechanics avoids "detailed mechanism", just claiming an electron can have unreal negative kinetic energy and penetrate barriers like ghost.

This barrier is Not wall-like.  Even "air" with large empty space is counted as "insulator".  When this insulator is very thin (= ~nm ) and voltage is applied, some electrons can go through spaces inside the insulator, which is natural phenomenon, irrelevant to "quantum ghost".

Computer transistors were invented by experimentalists' experience and trial and error like Edison's inventions.

Computer basic structure hasn't changed since its discovery.  It's quite simple.  Engineers can only aim at smaller transistors, which attempt is impossible now after Moore's law ended.

Human body is still unknown mystery.  Many diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer are still incurable.  Because the current old unrealistic quantum physics cannot handle atomic or molecular interactions.

Why cannot quantum mechanics deal with atomic interaction, instead, it has to rely on unreal quasiparticle model ?

Because quantum mechanics cannot calculate 'force'.  To predict particles' motion or which direction each electron moves in chemical reaction, computing 'force' applied to particles is necessary.

Quantum mechanics also uses Coulomb energy, but Not Coulomb force.  This quantum Coulomb energy is Not true energy but fake energy gotten by choosing fake solution of unsolvable muti-electron atoms, so meaningless.

To know exact Coulomb 'force' between atoms, we have to deal with each electron as a real "moving particle" avoiding each other.

"An electron is a moving particle by Coulomb force" is proved by experiments which disagrees with quantum mechanical model where each electron spreads over all space as static electron cloud which tells us nothing about detailed picture inside an atom.

The sum of kinetic and Coulomb energies is the total energy E which must be conserved or constant wherever electrons are.

The kinetic energy operator is expressed as derivative.  So if each electron is a "point particle", it is expressed as "delta function" and diverges to infinity (= Not conserving energy ) when differentiated by kinetic energy operator.

This is why each quantum mechanical electron has to spread over all space smoothly as electron cloud instead of a moving particle.  So each electron must be everywhere inside a quantum atom.

Two electrons can be everywhere independently without avoiding each other inside a helium atom which quantum model makes it impossible to conserve total energy wherever two electrons are, unless a helium can split into three unreal independent hydrogen atoms, which fact proves quantum mechanics is wrong.

To conserve the total energy in muti-electron atoms, each electron must be a moving particle avoiding each other instead of a spreading electron cloud.  This realistic atomic model needs modern computers to calculate it.

In 1920s when quantum mechanics was born, there were No modern computers, which is why physicists at that time gave up real atomic model, instead, started to use unreal quantum mechanics which obstructs even the current science.

Only Coulomb force is Not enough to describe real atomic behavior.
We also need Pauli exclusion principle which cannot be expressed as real force in quantum mechanics ( this p.6 ).

Quantum mechanics get only fake energy by integrating fake solution instead of solving it.  Quantum Pauli principle is expressed as nonphysical exchange energy in this integral.

For quantum Pauli principle to be valid, symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions must give different total energies (= antisymmetric corresponds to Pauli principle ).

But if the muti-electron atom has exact solution = its total energy is conserved and constant, energies of symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions become the same which invalidates quantum Pauli principle.

Electron spin is unrealistic (= faster-than-light spinning ? ), cannot explain Pauli exclusion principle for which we need other things than Coulomb electric charges.

Both classical and quantum atomic models use de Broglie wave which was experimentally confirmed.  When an orbital length is an integer times de Broglie wavelength, it avoids destructive interference and gives exact energies and orbital radius.

Quantum mechanics also tacitly uses this de Broglie wave, but cannot admit it as real wave, because its zero angular momentum causes destructive interference of electron's de Broglie wave, and "wave medium" contradicts Einstein relativity.

If we admit real moving electrons and de Broglie waves through real medium, we can explain all phenomena such as two-slit and Pauli principle.

Destructive interference of electrons' de Broglie waves can explain 'real' Pauli exclusion force.  An electron must cross the opposite-phase orbit of another electron's wave "perpendicularly" to avoid destructive interference.

But when the atom contains too many orbits, all electrons cannot cross other electron's opposite-phase orbit one-to-one perpendicularly = some electrons must be parallel to other electron's opposite phase which causes destructive interference of de Broglie waves and kicks out the electrons.  ← 'real' Pauli exclusion force.

The current basic physics has stopped progressing since 1920s when physicists dismissed real things, and stopped pursuing truth.  We have to recover spirits of Newton and Archimedes to develop our science again.

Wasting taxpayers' money in fake science such as global warming and useless telescope by academia does only harm to crop and innocent people.  = No benefit for us.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

What is  'University'  ?

[ University censors and restricts free idea, science. ]

(U-1)  ↓ You cannot learn new things in 'dictatorial'  

What is "university" ?  When it was hard to publish and copy books, university was the most efficient way for many people to get new knowledge.

Now you can get almost all knowledge using books and internet without wasting money in expensive university.  Why do many students still go to useless college ?

We are 'brainwashed' ?  Many politicians still try to spend huge taxpayers' money in useless college-for-all plan against the trend.  They cave in to big educational industry ?

What if 'university' restricts our free idea, speech , prevents us from exploring new science ?

Even if you graduate from college, you cannot answer the questions "What causes Coulomb force ?", "What's the shape of a photon ?", "Why doesn't electron spin stop ?"  ← College makes you ignorant ?

The present physics is full of fantasy such as parallel worlds, extra-dimension, BigBang, black hole, unreal quantum cat and computer.  ← College teaches fake science ?

Trump and Brexit revealed mainstream media is fake news.  But if the current science is wrong, it means all the media and adademia have deceived us for 100 years.  Is it possible ?

If fake news continued for 100 years, the media and academia get used to it, and feel No guilt about lying.  For example, "Gravitational wave proved Einstein was right" is untrue.

Einstein general relativity has flaws, it cannot conserve energy or generate wave.  So Einstein introduced nonphysical "pseudo-tensor" as gravitational fake wave.  There are many possible pseudo-tensors with freely-adjustable parameters ( this p.5 ), so it cannot predict anything or prove Einstein theory.

If Einstein was right, the "time stop" prevents black hole from forming, colliding and spinning. = Academia feels No guilt about these fake news, if they chose wrong science 100 years ago.

Actually, these black hole and gravitational wave are still useless, just wasting taxpayers' money, which fact proves they are 'fiction'.

In the early 20th century, Bohr's realistic model agreed with experimental results, assuming a moving electron generates de Broglie wave which was confirmed and avoids destructive interference in quantized orbits.

"Accelerating electron loses energy ?" is fake news fabricated later to deny Bohr model, because classical Bohr model was accepted then and got Nobel prize.

When a single electron is a collection of smaller charges storing energy, it loses energy by acceleration, breaking into smaller charges.  But a single electron is inseparable (= No 'stored energy' field ) in Bohr model, it doesn't lose energy just by acceleration.

The problem is there were No modern computers in 1920s, so physicists couldn't compute complicated electrons' motions of helium or bigger atoms.
Bohr model failed to explain helium atom including two electrons without computers.

But physicists couldn't wait for so long time until modern computer was invented later.  They had to continue their research (= even if relying on unreal model ) to get research funds or promoted.

Realistic atomic model failed, so only unrealistic model was left, this is quantum mechanics which nobody understands.

Quantum mechanics stopped treating an electron as a real moving object, instead, it just shows static electron cloud, though the electron has kinetic energy.  ← contradiction !

Hydrogen of quantum mechanics has unreal zero angular momentum which means an electron moves in one-dimensional linear orbit and crashes into nucleus.  Its de Broglie wave interferes with itself destructively.

Zero angular momentum cannot generate observed magnetic field.  So they introduced unreal electron spin (= faster-than-light rotation ? ), which accidentally agreed with Bohr magneton.  ← too good to be true !

This is why quantum mechanics had to discard realistic picture of atomic electrons, instead, treats each electron and light (= photon ) as nonphysical math objects with No physical figure.

So these colorful pictures of particles are fake images to deceive laypersons and make the current unreal physics look real.  Quantum physics can only describe each particle as nonphysical math (= a or b ).

There is No evidence of a photon = particle nature of light.  Both photoelectric and Compton effects showed light's energy is related to its wavelength, which means light is a wave,  a photon is Not a particle.

If we treat light as a photon particle traveling in the space without medium, in two-slit experiment, a photon has to pass both slits simultaneously using two different parallel worlds.

Light interference and refraction by Huygens prove a light is a wave traveling through "medium" at different speeds like sound waves.  No evidence for a photon.

Textbooks and the media hide the fact that the present physics discarding "medium" uses unreal virtual photons with imaginary mass as force, because an electron cannot emit a 'real' photon conserving total energy and momentum.

This unrealistic picture of a photon was compatible with unreal Einstein theory without medium and formed mathematical (= nonphysical ) quantum field theory and led to fictional extra-dimension of Einstein dream.

"Atomic bomb proved Einstein mc2" is fake news.  Nuclear energy is potential (= Not kinetic ) energy, which means "medium (= rejected by Einstein )" around particles has real mass changed by potential energy which was first shown by Maxwell.

Einstein copied Maxwell mc2 in the wrong way.  Einstein mass is illusion, "A mass can change freely by observer's motion without any external medium ?"
An electron moving at higher speed generates higher-energy de Broglie wave in the surrounding medium which increases its electron mass as shown in Maxwell mc2.

"QED using unreal virtual particles is the most successful theory" is fake news.  QED calculation always gives infinity ( this p.4 ), so they just artificially subtract infinity from infinity to get small finite value by ad-hoc renormalization.

Actually, Feynman and Dirac criticized this QED trick as "hocus-pocus".
Nobody uses this QED in our daily lives, which proves QED is an unrealistic, meaningless theory.

Unreal quantum theory can only increase illusory particles.
Fractional-charge quark, weak boson, Higgs, dark matter (= supersymmetry ) are all undetectable in our world, which means they don't exist like virtual particle.

They just claim "some particle was found" just by seeing "irrelevant garbage" inside collider.  Actually, no matter how many times physicists say "some particles were found", these particles are still useless, just wasting taxpayers' money.

These God-particle pictures are all fake.  Quark, weak boson, Higgs, supersymmetry are all just nonphysical math objects with No physical figure.
"Symmetry" is an artificial concept fabricated to develop this nonphysical theory, irrelevant to our real world.

Quantum mechanics cannot solve helium, either.  It just chooses fake solution with freely-adjustable parameters.

So "quantum mechanics is successful theory" is fake news, it cannot deal with multi-electron atoms, they have to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake (= effective ) mass and charge to explain variable physical phenomena.

They resorted to bogus rough approximation called "band model" which treats the whole solid (= made of many electrons ) as "fake one quasi-electron" with fake (= effective ) mass which can be negative.

So "computer transistor and smartphone use quantum mechanics" is fake news.  Band model relies on unreal quasipartice.  Tunnel is Not ghost quantum phenomenon.  Useful transistor was discovered by trial and error, Not by quantum mechanics.

Now we have modern computers.  So physicists can graduate from unreal quasiparticle model and express physical phenomena using only real electrons and nuclei by the current computer's power and technology to cure disease.

But once the unreal theory is establised and deep rooted, it is very difficult for physicists to discard this unreal quasiparticle model which got even Nobel prize.

Dismissing unreal quasiparticle model means we have to dismiss all the current theories such as quantum mechanics, Einstein and fake Green technology.

So academia has to continue using this useless obsolete quantum physics which obstructs all applied science, prevents us from curing diseases.

University and journal desperately protect this old science, reject research papers against their so-called "mainstream" theory,  brainswash students controlling all the media.

"Einstein is right !" is a blatant fake news.  Textbooks hide Einstein's true paradox.

Einstein says a moving clock ticks slower, which causes twin paradox in two satellites in the same orbit (= the same gravitational potential = No gravitational time dilation, so twin paradox appears )  Textbooks mention only the case where twins experience different gravitational potentials which cancel twin paradox.

GPS time error must be corrected real-time by ground stations irrelevant to Einstein.  So Einstein relaticity is meaningless in GPS.  "PET using antiparticle ?" is fake news.

Einstein relativity contradicts electron's de Broglie wave, rotating disc, "predicting future", force and Lorentz magnetic force where observer can charge wire ? = debate still continues.  These are true paradoxes showing Einstein is false.

Can we disprove quantum mechanics ?  Yes.  The total energy E of the atom is the sum of kinetic and Coulomb potential energy.  If the atom has exact solution and energy, this total energy E is always conserved (= E is constant, wherever electrons are ).

An electron of quantum mechanics cannot be a "moving point particle" avoiding other electrons which must include a time variable and be expressed as delta function which diverges to infinity when it is differentiated by kinetic energy operator.

So each electron of quantum mechanics always spreads in all space as electron cloud.  Wherever two electrons are (= two electrons of helium can be everywhere independently in all space ), their total energy must be conserved, which is impossible, because a helium must split into three independent unreal hydrogens.

There is No concept of 'force' in quantum mechanics where Pauli repulsion is Not admitted as real force ( this p.6 ) but as nonphysical, unknown antisymmetric math.

Pauli principle of bigger atoms is expressed by combining two hydrogen orbitals as (anti)symmetric wavefunction.  If the atom has the exact solution (= total energy E is conserved ), the total energies of symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions must be same, which means No Pauli exclusion energy appears.

The current Pauli principle is old, introduced 100 years ago.  It assumes only the case where multi-electron atoms cannot have exact solution.  = No exact solution → integrate fake chosen solution instead of solving it → Pauli exclusion energy appears as nonphysical exchange energy by this integral.

In multi-electron atoms, only when electrons avoid each other in one-dimensional orbits (= Not spreading as electron cloud ), the total energy of the atom can be conserved.

Destructive interference of electrons' de Brioglie waves can explain 'real' Pauli exclusion force.  An electron must cross the opposite-phase orbit of another electron's wave "perpendicularly" to avoid destructive interference.

But when the atom contains too many orbits, all electrons cannot cross other electron's opposite-phase orbit one-to-one perpendicularly = some electrons must be parallel to other electron's opposite phase which causes destructive interference of de Broglie waves and kicks out the electrons.  ← 'real' Pauli exclusion force.

Unless we admit 'real' moving electrons avoiding each other, real de Broglie wave which gives orbital radius and real Pauli force, we cannot move forward to control each atom or cure disease, though we already have the technology, only old quantum mechanical model prevents it.

Academia has the biggest political power to collect the entire world's huge taxpayers' money freely even for fake science (= AI, global warming ) and political correctness.

Academia controls all the media and pressures politicians with that money.  Student debt forgiveness, school bus, school mental health, child-care, open-border .. all lead to increasing students and tuition, profiting useless university.

The current 'sci-fi' physics is Not science, they focus only on 'philosophical activity' such as selling books, holding conference, lecture, sticking to old history forever. = No progress, or back to the middle ages ?

We have to awake from 100-year-old fake news by academia and university.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Our universe is fiction ?

[ We live in a 'fairy-tale' world made by science writers ? ]

(S-1)  ↓ What you believe is true may not be true in  

What if we live in a fictional world such as Alice in Wonderland or Peter Pan ?   You may not believe it, but this is true story.

We believe 'fiction' or screenplay written by some writers as truth and schools teach it to students.  This horrible story is really true ?

In their script,  Trump and Brexit were supposed to lose.

Our universe is expanding faster-than-light from BigBang spawning other universes ?  Black and worm holes are 'gateways to alien worlds' ?

Space is 11-dimensional, filled with fictional negative-mass gravitons ?
All these things are 'fiction' written by physicists = science writers ?

Vacuum is not empty, filled with unreal virtual particles with imaginary mass ?  All proton, neutron, Higgs use these illusory virtual particles ?

Around you, birds are singing, plants amass energy by photosynthesis.
How do the current textbooks tell you about it ?

Quantum mechanics tells you that each electron can be in two places at once in photosynthesis like a dead and alive cat in two parallel universes.

This bold and logic-defying idea is called "superposition", which is the current mainstream physics which claims a particle splits into two parallel worlds also in double slits.

These parallel worlds are unobservable like 'fairy-tale'.  They claim if we try to peer into these parallel worlds, they suddenly split into a single real world.  ← too good to be true !

Birds sense Earth's magnetic field using faster-than-light spooky entanglement ?  Of course, nothing can exceed light speed, so it's also 'fairy-tale'.  No real thing is 'teleported'.

Plants, biology and computers use 'ghost-like' tunnel and fictitious quasiparticles ?  Quasiparticle is unreal with fake mass and charge.

Physicists waste time in creating fictional monopole, fractional-charge, even sonic-black hole and another universe using quasiparticles.

Green new technology using 'unreal' quasiparticle is useless, scam.  Global warming is just 'publicity stunt' by politicians ?
The world is actually cooling, which damages crops and causes flood ?

Why is such a miserable thing happening ?
Why does nobody try to fix it ?  We have to look back on the past.

In 1920s when quantum mechanics was born, there were No computers to compute complicated forces among many electrons.

So physicists should have waited to deal with multi-electron atoms and molecules until modern computers were invented ?  Witouht computers at that time, only one-electron hydrogen can be solved (= helium cannot ).

Of course, physicists couldn't wait for so long time.  They had to continue their research ( even if it is unreal ) to get research funds and promoted.

Some great physicists opposed it.  Einstein disliked quantum mechanics.  Feynman said "Nobody understands it", "QED is hocus-pocus" like Dirac.  But most physicists had to continue research.

They resorted to bogus rough approximation called "band model" which treats the whole solid (= made of many electrons ) as "fake one quasi-electron" with fake (= effective ) mass which can be negative.

So "computer transistor and smartphone use quantum mechanics (= use unreal particle )" is untrue.  If quantum mechanics really contributed to computer technology, computers could've been easily made using quantum mechanics in 1920s.

Ordinary people don't know the current solid physics is useless filled with these unreal quasiparticles.  We are deceived by false images of fake news which try to make the current physics look 'cutting-edge', useful.

Now we have modern computers.  Then, physicists discard unreal quasiparticle model and express physical phenomena using only real electrons and nuclei ?  This is very difficult.

Because the present quantum physics depends on unreal quasiparticle model which got Nobel prize.  So discarding quasiparticles means you have to discard all of the current theory including Einstein.

Physicists must keep using this useless quantum physics which obstructs science and prevents us from curing diseases forever.

Academia controls the 'scientific idea' by writing that script with the biggest political power.  When they say something was found ( even if it is useless ), they can get the entire world's huge taxpayers' money freely.

Political correctness is also a 'political tool' introduced by academia to get taxpayers' money like climate change.  They can pressure politicians and use them like 'puppets' by those huge money.

The current 'sci-fi' physics is Not science but ' literature' or 'poem' to sell books obssessed with old history.  = No more scientific progress.

Why do so many students still want to go to useless college with high tuition and debt ?  Using internet and books, you can get almost all knowledge without wasting money in expensive university.

Because academia controls your idea as a "science writer" of the world.  Even if you avoid going to college, you cannot invent new technology.  Science was stopped by academia which controls all the media brainwashing us.

So you have no choice but to go to university to get useless degree which is the only tool by which employers judge your ability in this 'fairy-tale' world.

If the basic science stops progressing, there is No more American dream, No chance to reverse the situation, the wealth gap is fixed or wider.

We have to get back real "science" from authoritarian science writer = academia which freely controls our idea by rewriting the script of the world's science as they like.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Mainstream science is wrong  ?

[ Humans believed unreal flat-earth,  then quantum physics, too ? ]

(G-1)  ↓ Academia = mainstream science was wrong →  

For more than a thousand years, humans believed flat-earth was real, and church = the then academia taught it as a mainstream science.

Technology developed, and ships could go very far in the age of exploration, peope noticed flat-earth was wrong.

Until then, scientists against flat-earth = the then mainstream science had been persecuted.  Is it possible such a thing will happen again ?

97% scientists believe global warming is real.
It could be wrong ?  The world is actually cooling ?

Academia, scientists had believed unreal flat-earth for far longer time than quantum mechanics = the current mainstream science invented in 1920s.

Then, quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity which were only 100-year-old could be wrong ?  The current academia = schools teach students wrong science ?

The present physics is full of occult things such as parallel worlds, a dead and alive cat, extra-dimension, changing the past.  How have we believed these weird science for 100 years ?

In 1920s, there were No modern computers.  Physicists couldn't compute three-body helium atom using Bohr's realistic model which succeeded in hydrogen-like atoms.

Realistic atomic model failed without computers, then physicists needed unrealistic model discarding real moving electrons.  It was quantum mechanics.

Nobody understands quantum mechanics which is mystery forever.
Quantum mechanics cannot solve helium, either.  It just chooses fake solution with freely-adjustable parameters.

So quantum mechanics is useless, cannot deal with multi-electron atoms, they have to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake (= effective ) mass and charge to explain it.

Quantum computer using fictional parallel worlds and quasiparticle failed with No progress.  All applied science was obstructed by unreal quantum physics. = Cancer and Alzheimer are still incurable.

Why didn't we doubt these fantasied physics until now ?
Because we are 'brainwashed' by fake news which were debunked by Trump and Brexit against globalist = academia.

Photoelectric and Compton effects prove a light is a particle (= photon ? ).  This is blatant fake news.  All these phenomena involve light "wavelength", which means light is "wave".

Light interference, refraction by Huygens prove a light is a wave traveling through "medium" at different speeds like sound waves.  No evidence for a photon.

Uncanny quantum mechanics has to rely on unreal parallel worlds to explain this interference, which was compatible with Einstein relativity dismissing real "medium".

Quantum mechanics is silent about the 'shape' of a photon, it just shows nonphysical math object with No physical figure as a photon.

Most textbooks avoid the fact that the current physics discarding "medium" uses unreal virtual photons with imaginary mass as force. = Mainstream science lacks reality.

"Tunnel is quantum effect", "Bohr model's accelerating electron loses energy ?" are fake news, too.  Even classical Bohr model was accepted then and got Nobel prize.

Uncertain quantum mechanics is more unrealistic, avoids the detailed atomic picture, just saying an electron has kinetic energy, but does Not move !?

"Accelerating charge emits energy" is Not about a single electron of Bohr's hydrogen (= stable by de Broglie wave ) but about "many small charges" forming electric fields.  So this logic cannot be used to deny classical atomic model.

"Atomic bomb uses Einstein mc2 ?" is false.  Nuclear energy is potential (= Not kinetic ) energy, which means "medium (= rejected by Einstein )" around particles has real mass which was first shown by Maxwell.

Einstein copied Maxwell mc2 in the wrong way.  His relativity says unrealistic things "A mass can change freely by observer's motion ?"  = mass is illusion ?

GPS time error must be corrected real-time by ground stations irrelevant to Einstein.  So Einstein relaticity is meaningless in GPS.  "PET using antiparticle ?" is fake news.

Physicists waste time in imaginary particles of colliders and fantasy BigBang, black hole which cannot be formed by stopping time.  So black hole doesn't exist.  All these concepts are illusion.

"Einstein was right !" is fake news to get taxpayers' money.  Those doubtful physics ignores other factors than Einstein.  Light is bent by "atmosphere or dusts (= Not Einstein )",  Gravitational wave is unreal pseudo-tensor irrelevant to Einstein relativity.

Fake "commercial" is one of fake news about fictional quantum computer and technology to get taxpayers' money.  Actually the fake 'commercial' computer is useless with No progress.

The current 'sci-fi' physics is Not science but 'literature' to sell books of old history.  Useless physics causing mental illness, the only jobs left for physicists are science writers or bloggers.

Schools teaching fake science destroy students' future, and cause mental illness.  But academia tries to use this 'mental health' as 'business', because 'physical health' is difficult for the current useless science to handle.

Worthless university needs to create other 'money-making' tools such as political correctness, fake AI and climate change.

Academia has the biggest political power, can collect the world's huge taxpayers' money ( even for fake science ), control the media and politicians.

Student debt relief, child-care, open-border .. All lead to increasing students and tuition, which will just increase victims of fake science, worsen mental illness.

If basic science stops progressing, all industries stop, which makes political debates boring.  ' School bus' or 'vague love' is the current top issue ?

See this week physics is still useless.

 

AI robots take human job  ?

[ Quantum mechanics is useless in AI and human body. ]

(Q-1)  ↓ Diseases are incurable due to useless  

AI and robots will take human jobs in near future ?
All nations including China and Russia compete to develop AI.

What the heck is artificial intelligence (= AI ) ?  Is it useful ?

AI is really worth spending taxpayers' money for ?  AI is just "publicity stunt" rather than technology, as seen in Tesla ?

What's the difference between human body and robot ?
Robot's hand can perform only simple motion and task.

Far more complicated and finer motion is possible in human hand.  Human is made of smaller sophisticated cells, robot is made of bigger bolts and wires.

Every motor and sensory nerve leads to brain where human can think and decide what to do next, while robot cannot think independently without human's orders.

AI in robot operates by "programming" in computers.
Computer and mobile phones are said to use quantum mechanics.

But quntum mechanics is full of unreality such as parallel worlds, a dead and alive cat, faster-than-light spooky, ghost-tunnel, changing the past.

Though 100 years have passed since its foundation, nobody understands quantum mechanics.  How can we use this weird quantum physics in computer ?

Human body is still mystery.  Cancer and Alzheimer are still incurable.  It means 100-year-old quantum mechanics is useless and wrong in human body ?

In fact, weird quantum physics is Not used in computer, either.
Computer is made of simple transistors which can recognize only 0 or 1.

Founders tried to find suitable semiconductor by trial and error, repeating many failures, which took many years, it was lucky accidental discovery.

If quantum mechanics could tell them how to make computer from the beginning, it would have Not taken so many years and efforts.

So experimentalists' experience and persistence brought them discovery of transistors.  Theory of quantum mechanics had nothing to do with it.

Useless quantum mechanics relies on unreal quasiparticle and fake (= effective ) mass to explain semiconductor, so meaningless theory.

Human brain can think independently and creatively.  AI can only play chess, which program and computer were created by "human brain".

Self-driving car is scam, cannot avoid accident in complicated situation which human can easily handle.  So human brain is far superior to AI.

In human cells, DNA, proteins, enzymes cause far more complicated, variable reactions than a computer which recognizes only simple 0 or 1.

Why quantum mechanics cannot deal with these complicated human cell reactions ?  Because quantum mechanics gave up real physical picture 100 years ago.

It can only describe each particle as nonphysical math object with No physical figure.  Pauli repulsion is Not admitted as real force but as unreal math (= still unknown, this p.6 ).

We already have technology to manipulate each single atom.  But physicists still try to apply unreal nonphysical old physics model to interpreting microscopic results instead of using real physical model.

Those useful technology remains useless forever due to old quantum mechanics.

So the current sci-fi physics turned into "literature" to sell books at a amazon discount, or history stuck with old physics = No progress.

Academia needed to create fake science such as illusory global warming with No innovation and "mental health business", because the current physics cannot cure cancer.

AI is also one of those fake science for academia and corporations to steal taxpayers' money.

Fake science changed education into "scam". Politicians privatized student loan and banned their bankruptcy, then it accelerated skyrocketing tuition.

Saying "debt free!", university uses donors as "advertizement" to get more taxpayers' money for them and demands to open border, which will further increase students and tuition.  ← vicious cycle.

The best way for mental health is to stop schools from teaching fake science which just destroys students' future and prevents us from curing diseases forever.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Continued from

See previous version of criticizing top journals.

to

2019/7/17 updated. Feel free to link to this site.