Einstein  is false.

Home page
Einstein is false
GPS No relativity

Einstein needs unreal parallel worlds !?

[ Einstein rejected "medium" → parallel-world interference ? ]

(Fig.3)  A single electron splits into parallel worlds !?

Einstein rejected real "medium".

So the current physics needs unreal parallel worlds to explain a single electron interference in double-slit experiment.

If we admit some "medium" in space, we can naturally explain why even a single particle can interfere with itself in double-slit experiment.

We don't need unreal parallel worlds of quantum mechanics.
We only need real "medium".

 

Light refraction  proves "medium".

[ Light refraction proves the light is wave travelling in medium. ]

(Fig.4)  Light velocity changes in medium → Einstein was wrong.

Light refraction proves that light velocity c changes in different "medium", which contradicts Einstein relativity denying "light medium".

This light refraction obeys Huygens' principle, where difference in wavefront speeds in mediums gives refraction angle, it proves the light is wave, Not particle.

Whatever the incidence angle is, the ratio of incidence to refraction angles is constant, equal to the ratio of light speeds in mediums.

If the light is particle, which Einstein said, the light particle must scatter in random directions between different mediums, regardless of its speed.

 

Einstein's "light photon"  is wrong.

[ Light particle decelerates → accelerates between media ? ]

(Fig.5)  Light photon particle  fast → slow → fast  again !?

We know the light becomes slower and is bent, when it enters water from air.

And when light goes out of water, it accelerates and is bent back again ?

If light is a photon particle, the bending angle is random because of scattering.  But refractive angle is fixed in each medium.

And this photon particle must be accelerated again when it exits water.  There is NO strange thing to "reaccelerate" light in water !

 

Mass increase has nothing to do with Einstein.

See Relativistic mass is unreal.

 

Energy-mass relation of E = mc2 was derived by Maxwell equation irrelevant to Einstein relativity.

[ Einstein "copied" Maxwell's mc2 in the "wrong" way. ]

(Fig.12')  ↓ Electromagnetic wave contradicts Einstein mc2

Maxwell first obtained the relation of E = mc2, and later Einstein relativistic theory copied it.

In fact, Einstein famous mc2 is self-contradictory, and Not his original idea.

This Einstein equation of mc2 is just a copy of classical Maxwell equation.  And Maxwell electromagnetic theory is right, and Einstein relativity is wrong, self-contradictory.

In 1800s, Maxwell showed the light wave has pressure = momentum p equal to energy E divided by light speed c ( p = E/c = mc  → E = mc2 ), which was known before Einstein ( this 3rd paragraph,  this p.9-2.22,  this p.22,  this 1.5-12th-paragraph,  this p.6,  this p.9-last,  this p.7 ).

Also from de Broglie wavelength λ and light energy, we can get the light wave has mass m ( p = h/λ, E = hc/λ,  momentum = p = mc = E/c → mc2 = E = energy ).

The original Maxwell equation obtained the relation of the momentum (= pem ) of the light electromagnetic wave is equal to Poyinting vector (= S ) divided by the square of light speed c ( pem = S/c2 = E/c,  this p.5-1.29,  this p.6, p.5-top,  this-lower-Summary,  this p.9 ).

From this Maxwell's relation and light energy density (= Eem = ε0E2 ← this E temporarily represents electric field,  this p.12-2.84,  this p.4-6,  this p.1-2 ), we can get the light's energy Eem = pem c = mc2 ( pem = mc, c is light speed, m is photon's mass ), which is the authentic Maxwell's mc2 relation ( this p.5-upper,  this p.20-second-paragraph ).

↑ In Maxwell's electromagnetic wave, its magnetic field (= B ) is known to be equal to E/c (= this E is electric field,  c is light speed ), which originates from the fact that the electric and magnetic fields have the same energy (= electric field induces magnetic field of the same energy, and vice versa,  this last ).

Einstein copied this Maxwell's mc2, and modified it in the wrong way.
It's a famous story that Einstein invented his ad-hoc relativistic theory based on classical Maxwell electromagnetic wave theory ( this 2nd-paragraph,  this last paragraph,  this middle,  this p.2-upper ), though Einstein relativistic electromagnetic theory includes fatal paradoxes like twin time paradox.

Einstein relativistic energy and mass contain fatal paradoxes, so false.

See this

 

Black hole is self-contradictory, so doesn't exist.

See Black hole is unreal.

 

Light is bent by refraction, NOT by Einstein.

[ Light refraction by air is much stronger than gravity. ]

(Fig.24)  ↓ Light is bent by air, NOT Einstein gravity.

Einstein general relativity claims that light is slightly bent by gravity.  But the earth's gravity is too small to observe it.

We can observe the light is strongly bent by the air due to classical light refraction.  Light refraction is far stronger than gravitational lensing ( > 1000 : 1 ) !

Einstein relativity cannot explain light refraction, so they ignore it.  Light deflection is not by general relativity but by classical theory.

Test of Einstein theory is targeted at stars too far away to confirm.  They introduced artificial dark matter where gravity failed.  ← nonsense.

 

Einstein is useless.

[ Einstein relativistic effect is doubtful, too weak, useless. ]

(Fig.25)  Too week Einstein time dilation is hidden in the air medium.

Einstein relativity is useless in our daily lives.
So we can say Einstein theory is unreal, and it'll be no harm, if we forget Einstein.

Einstein tests such as black hole and BigBang are meaningless, because they deal with just imaginary things which are too far away to confirm.

Einstein relativistic effect includes fatal paradox, and too weak to be useful, even if it is real.

GPS time correction doesn't need too weak relativistic effect.
Atmosphere has much larger effect than very tiny relativistic effect in GPS.

All particles inside large hadron collider cannot be isolated or confirmed, so doubtful, useless.

PET is due to "electron capture", which doesn't need unreal antiparticle.

So neither Einstein special nor general relativity is useful for our daily lives.
Their research is waste of time and money.

 

to

2018/9/12 updated. Feel free to link to this site.