Time reversed → antimatter ?

Top
Summary

Time machine generated antimatter !?

[ Antimatter disappeared by time-reversal symmetry violation ? ]

(Fig.1)  ↓ Time reversed antimatter is nonphysical, No grounds.

There is No antimatter in our universe.
Physicists try to explain this reason using nonphysical model.

They claim time-reversal symmetry violation explains missing antimatter.
"Time-reverse" means "return to the past using time machine"  ← nonsense.

If we can reverse time, direction of magnetic moment (= rotation ) changes, and electric direction is unchanged in atoms.  That's all.  It cannot explain why antimatter disappears.

These symmetry such as time-reversal is nonphysical, artificial math model, which has nothing to do with real world ( this p.5, this p.13 ), so meaningless concept.

In fact, antimatter itself is unreal, useless.  "Positron-emission tomography (= PET ) uses antimatter" is fake news, because proton cannot break into heavier neutron and positron.

They intentionally misinterpret "electron capture" as imaginary positron-emission, both these reactions are the same, indistinguishable.  = antimatter is unnecessary.

Electron-positron annihilation must emit unreal virtual photon,  They ignore enormous Coulomb energy between electron and positron.

They cannot produce antimatter only from light, which contradicts the original theory.  They need to collide electrons or protons with target nuclei, violating momentum conservation.

So again, physicists intentionally misinterpret protons, electrons or γ rays as illusory antimatter, which is too unstable, can be detected only as light.

All these reactions of "illusory" antimatter need "nucleus", indicating Einstein mass energy is nuclear energy by short-distance Coulomb force, not by antimatter.

 

What is electron 'spin' ?

[ Quantum mechanics shows No detailed figure of spin. ]

(Fig.2)   Spin is just nonphysical math symbol without reality.   

What is electron spin ?  It is called 'spin', but Not real 'spinning' ?

Quantum mechanics has avoided answering even this simple question for 100 years, which clearly obstructs our science.

They just show abstract nonphysical math symbol (= S ) as 'spin', tell us No more detailed mechanism of spin.

Because they know 'spin' lacks physical reality.

This research is just theory, Not experiment.   They try to explain high-temperature superconductor by unreal spin model and artificial parameters ( this p.1-2 )

Quantum superposition means a dead and alive cat in fantasy parallel worlds, which can never be observed, so just imagination.

This research just tries to misinterpret "overlapped classical lights" as illusory photons' superposition.  ← meaningless research.

 

to

2019/4/12 updated. Feel free to link to this site.