**1. Quantum mechanics is useless**

Solid-physics, Quantum-field-theory, Ferromagnet

**2. Quantum computer is "scam" !**

Quantum-computer.

**3. Schrodinger equation is wrong**

Schrodinger-helium, Density-functional-theory

**4. Electron spin is unreal**

Spin, Pauli-principle, Singlet-triplet

**5. Photon doesn't exist**

Photon, Virtual-particle, ARPES

**6. Einstein, Hawking are "fiction"**

Gravitational-wave, Black-hole, BigBang, Hawking

**7. Special relativity paradox**

Paradox, Michelson-Morley

**8. Large hadron collider is useless trash**

Higgs, Anti-particle

**9. University tuition is skyrocketing**

Tuiiton-fee, UK-science

*(Ro-1) Why unreal quasiparticles are rampant ? *

The present physics faces **critical** situation, filled with various **unreality**, parallel universe and extradimensions.

What's the **root** of these *evils* ?

The root is "quantum mechanics", which cannot solve three-body problem.

To predict three-body (= multi-electron ) motion, we have to actually compute each Coulomb force and correct their motions at short time intervals.

But quantum wavefunction just gives "**vague** probability" with **no** clear electrons' orbits. So we cannot use the usual methods in three-body planetary orbits !

Different from solvable H atom, it's **impossible** to find a single common helium ground state energy. All they can do is choose *fake* wavefunction.

"**Choose**" means quantum mechanics **cannot** *predict* any physical values.

So all physicists rely on is **unreal** quasiparticle and fake ab-initio DFT.

This **useless** quantum theory **destroys** careers of all students now.

*(Ro-2) Physicists need imaginary target = quantum computer.*

If *basic* quantum theory remains useless, physicists have **nothing** to do.

So they needed to create "**imaginary**" target = quantum computer.

They paid attention to doubtful probabilistic nature in quantum superposition where a cat can be dead **and** alive at the same time.

Of course, we **cannot** see a grotesque "dead and alive" cat directly.

But they abused this **absurd** logic in entanglement and quantum computer.

They misinterpret "1 or 2 *unknown*" as "1 and 2 states **coexist**" !

So the moment they see "1 state", entangled "2 state" is confirmed (= spooky ) ?

Quantum computer calculates "different numbers" using **parallel** worlds ? Of course we cannot confirm this "**fantasy**" parallel worlds, so a waste of money.

*(Ro-3) Quantum + Einstein = QED → 10 dimensions string !*

If quantum theory remains useless, there are **nothing** to do.

This is the reason they exploited Einstein as relativistic field theory (= QED ).

Physicists needed some "**virtual** targets" such as relativistic symmetry in quantum theory with **no** contents.

In fact, Einstein relativity includes fatal paradoxes.

And Black hole is just **fiction**, cannot form within age of universe !

Furthermore, this relativistic theory produced *unreal* virtual particles, which **contradicts** relativity ! And the calculated results always diverge to infinity.

Using *irrational* math trick ( ∞ = ∞ + finite ), they could get any values as they like. So this QED is **meaningless** as physics. Even Dirac and Feynman **disliked** it.

Despite this contradiction, physicists craved for "**imaginary** target" and rule (= relativity, symmetry ) as "*incentive*" which produced unreal particles.

So the **root** of all these evils is "quantum mechanics" with no useful contents, which needs "imaginary" target (= incentive ).

*(De-1) The only unified theory = unreal string !*

Einstein dream was really 10 dimensional string theory with parallel universes ? In fact Einstein hated quantum mechanics as "spooky".

So their "Einstein dream" is **misleading**.

Now, the only theory of everything is string (or 11 dimension M ) theory !

So if you **don't** believe *unreal* "extradimension", you **cannot** enjoy worldwide fame like Hawking and Lisa.

Witten is a titan of string theory. But **all** string theorists believe wrong math ( 1+2+3+ .. = ∞ = -1/12 ! ) He is really a "math expert" ?

String theory filled with abstract symbols has No physical images of particle. It includes 10^{500} different worlds, which **cannot** predict any physical values.

So **useless** except in ( social ) media.

Even critic, Woit **feeds** on "string vs. anti battle" with no progress.

The serious problem is these theories are just increasing **victims** of wrong science in new students now !

*(De-2) "Relativistic" QED disobeys Einstein !*

Though the media repeats "Einstein dream", his theory "**special** relativity" already forms the **basis** of the current physics.

So if Einstein relativity includes fatal flaws, it's **harmful** to students in all fields ! In fact, relativity **contradicts** two-slit and magnetic force.

Relativity without medium must rely on *unreal* virtual particles and Big Bang in force and uniform microwaves.

Black hole **cannot** be formed within age of universe, despite their papers. General relativity is useless even in the **only** practical use, GPS.

So if students ( and school dropouts ) suffering from debt **sue** universities and the media for hiding true paradoxes, they could surely win back their money.

This news is **misleading**, too. because gravitational wave is *unreal* "**pseudo**tensor", which **vanishes** by observer, so Einstein **never** accepted it.

*(Es-1) "Entangle" is another name for "unknown".*

"Sorry, Einstein" means spooky action at a distance was confirmed ?

The problem is these news do not try to make ordinary people understand.

Because if they tell the truth, people notice entanglement (= spooky action ) is unreal with **no** meaning.

In fact, entanglement is based on far-fetched interpretation.

Suppose one of A and B atoms is in "up" state, and another is "down" state.

We **don't** know which A or B is "up (down)" in Es-1 upper.

Like Schrodinger cat, they try to **mis**interpret "unknown" as "superposition".

State 1 or 2 is **unknwon** = Different **worlds** 1 and 2 **coexist** at the *same* time ?

Quantum mechanics just considers "classical uncertainty" as "many-worlds" !

There is **no** spooky (= superluminal ) action here.

Einstein was *right* **only** in this entanglement except relativity.

*(Es-2) "Down" emits many photons, "up" remains dark.*

If electron spin is real spinning, its speed far exceeds light speed.

So in this experiment, they **didn't** see *unreal* spin itself.

They use two different energy levels in nitrogen as "up" and "down".

So the name "spin" is **misleading**.

By illuminating those atoms with some light, they change between these two energy levels. To know up or down state, they use another "detection light".

When illuminating the atom with the detection light, **only** "*down*" state is excited and **emits** many photons (= light ).

When the atom is in "*up*" state, it remains "dark", **not** emitting photons.

See the original paper ( p.3 right ).

*(Es-3) Photons from "down" are detected at C, D.*

In this experiment, these emitted photons are **divided** and sent to the distant **C** and the near D after illuminated with detection light.

By reducing the amount of light, a photodetector at C responds once (= one photon ? ), when the photon reaches there.

Of course, we **cannot** see a *fictional* photon itself.

They just interpret photodetector's weak light **signal** as a "photon".

So when the photodetector at C detects "one photon", it means **only** A ( or B ) is "**down**", emitting photons.

They illuminate both atoms again to change between "up" and "down" just after the first detection, and apply detection light to them, again.

So detecting a photon, a photon in succession means one of A and B is "up", another is "down" ( this p.2 ).

*(Es-4) Mix photon paths from A and B → entangle ?*

They **overlap**ped photons from A and B on a beam-splitter just **before** C.

It makes detected photon **in**distinguishable from A or B.

So we **don't** know **which**, A or B emitted a photon detected at C.

They just call this *unknown* origin "**entangle**ment" (= parallel-worlds ).

This is a very far-fetched interpretation !

We just **don't** know whether A or B atom is "up" ( or "down" ) *classical*ly.

But quantum mechanics claims this mixed photon from "**unknown**" origin means "two different **worlds** *coexist*" ( world-1: A-down, B-up, world-2; A-up, B-down ).

Just after this "entangled" state is confirmed at C, the near D detector in A **or** B detects another photon, and confirm which is "down" instantly (= spooky ? )

They claim long distance between A and B excluded slower-than-light link (= loop hole free ). But it relies on **un**realistic interpretation, so meaningless.

Universities should pay **back** tuition to students in useless science !

*(Sp-1) Know Spin A → Spin B determined instantly ?*

Probably almost **No** people know what this "entanglement" means.

It's called Einstein spooky action at a distance. Faster than light ?

This entanglement cannot send real information faster-than-light, because it contradicts Einstein relativity. So **useless**, *waste* of money.

In Sp-1 they illuminate two spins with the light, which is **adjusted** to *change* them between **only** two states ( up-up or down-down ).

In this state, when we measure spin A and **know** spin A is "up", it *determines* that spin B is also "up" **instant**ly (= spooky ? ).

As you see, this entanglement has **nothing** to do with faster-than-light action. In fact, this spooky action is based on far-fetched interpretation.

*(Sp-2) Be+ ion two energy levels = spin up down ?*

This **far-fetched** interpretation probably started with this Nature paper.
The point is electron spin lacks reality, its spinning far *exceeds* light speed.

In fact we **cannot** see this *unreal* spin directly.

They just measure some **two** "energy levels", and **name** them spin "up" and "down". That's all. So the name "spin" is **misleading**.

We can change these **energy** levels by *illuminating* them with some light. *Three* energy levels among spin "up-down", "up-up", "down-down" are **different**.

So by using the lights with specific frequency, we can manipulate and change them between only two states "up-up" and "down-down".

There is **No** mystery here. These are just "*classical*" phenonema.

*(Sp-3) ↓ Misinterpret "unknown" as "many-worlds" !*

The problem is the current *unreal* physics has stopped since 1920s, so there were **nothing** physicists could do, if they acceped the fact as it was.

Suppose the case when we **don't** know whether two atoms are in state 1 (= spin up-up ) or state 2 (= down-down ) in Sp-3.

Like Schrodinger cat, quantum mechanics tends to consider "**unknown**" state as "*superposition*" which includes two different states at the same time !

It is very **far-fetched** interpretation.

A or B is *unknown* → superposition of A and B = Many-**worlds** A and B !

This irrational logic is what their "entangle" is. See this.

There is no spooky action here. Einstein was right only in this.

This is why physicistis in extradimension and quantum computer pursue crazy parallel worlds. They should pay **back** tuition to students !

*(Ec-1) Medium is rejected → unreal virtual photon ?*

It's a famous story that Einstein relativity denied "ether" (= **medium** ).

Then how can Einstein's "**empty** space" transmit Coulomb *electric* force ?

They say "exchange of photons" mediates electromagnetic force.

In fact, Einstein without medium needs virtual photons as forces.

Ironically, these virtual photons disobey Einstein formula.

This is the reason why they are called "*virtual*", **not** real particles.

The fact is the media and universities **hide** true Einstein paradoxes !

Einstein equation **contradicts** electron's de Broglie and two-slit experiment.

In fact, special relativity forming basis of the modern physics **destroys** all students' career *silently*.

So if **any** students suffering from debt **sue** universities and the media for *hiding* true flaws, they could win back their money !

*(Ec-2) Why virtual photon lacks reality ?*

Then how do we describe these virtual photons ?

Special relativity combined with quantum mechanics forms quantum electrodynamics (= QED ).

The problem is this "relativistic" QED expresses a photons as just a **non**physical math symbol with **no** shape ! Photon create (= a^{†} ), annihilate (= a ). That's all.

Furthermore, all emitted photon and electromagnetic forces are *unreal* **virtual** particles. The mass squared of the virtual photon is **negative** ( this p.10 ) !

You may think it **strange** that QED using *unreal* virtual photons is the most successful (← ? ). In fact, these commentes are **not** true.

Actually, even **founders**, Feynman and Dirac called this QED "hocus-pocus". QED methods were just **artificial**ly "chosen", **not** predicted ones.

If QED gives correct values **only** from the original postulate of quantum mechanics, we can call it "successful". But it **doesn't**. So useless.

Its just gives useless "**infinity** = ∞ ". They just **chose** artificial "*stopgap*" methods for renormalization ( ∞ → ∞ + finite value ) from **many** choices.

*(Ec-3) ↓ Electron emits a ( virtual ) photon = NOT physics.*

Though the media tends to show only "colorful" pictures, their images are completely **misleading**.

All the current quantum theory can use is *abstract* diagram as electron emitting photon and forces. They
**lack** concrete realistic figures of particles.

Photon's symbol (= a^{†} ) is hidden in Maxwell equation (= A ).

Interaction between photon and electron is expressed as quite a simple term.

They just put a photon (= A ) and electrons (= ψ ) side by side in their interaction term.
That's all. So basic physics has **stopped** since 1920s as abstract symbols.

The problem is ordinary people are **misled** into believing as if the current physics was progressing.

*(Hs-1) ↓ Extradimension, multi-universes is science ?*

Hawaii supreme court revokes controversial Hawaii TMT telescope.

I'm relieved that this judgement will reduce "**victims**" of wrong science.

The media likes to compare it to "*science* vs. religion clash".

But what this telescope would pursue can be really called "science" ?

It's natural that persons with interests in in this telescope are angry at this decision. But the problem is almost **No** ordinary people have knowledge enough to take part in this discussion !

Because universities and the media shut out all basic physics information.

For example, do you know why they jumped to the **wrong** conclusion of gravity wave ?

The present science tries to link astronomy to "**fictional**" multi-universes and 10-dimensional string.
They are **impossible** to call "*science*".

*(Hs-2) "Time* **stop***" prevents black hole formation !*

They say this telescope is to clarify the early universe and black hole.

But "time stop" **forbids** this black hole to form from stars ( this #2 ).

So students should **sue** universities and the media for hiding true flaws to **stop** *skyrocketing*
tuition and useless degree in any countries.

The present astronomy is based on faster-than-light expansion Big Bang.

Strangely, this expansion energy is not diluted (= minus pressure ? )

All these researches rely on the **un**realistic assumtion that microwave (= CMB ) filling universe is the remnant of the early universe.

The point is this cosmic microwave is too **uniform** and isotropic with extremely small variaion ( ± 0.00003 Kelvin ), indicating uniform medium.

Thinking commonsensically, it's **impossible** that all these very *weak* microwave remain **intact** for 13.8 billion years from the early universe !

So they have to tell Hawaiian people **honestly** that black hole is a big **lie** and Big Bang has **no** proof at the next "*hearing*".

*(Le-1) ↓ Einstein denied real light "medium".*

In fact, Einstein with fatal flaws **ruins** all students' *careers*.

Black hole is just "fiction" and "destroyer" of new researchers.

If any students suffering from debt **sue** universities and the media for *hiding* true paradoxes, they could **win** back their money !

It's a famous story that Einstein relativity denied "ether" (= light **medium** ).

Instead, he introduced strange idea that "spacetime" is distorted by observer.

Relativity without absolute space is based on relative motion.

We and the light are **approach**ing each other at speeds "v" and "c" in Le-1.

This "observed" light speed must be "**c+v**" in this case.

But Einstein used tricky idea to make "c+v" *remain* the original "**c**" !

Light **interference** clearly proves the light is "**wave**" traveling through some "*medium*".

This "light *medium*" moving **with** the earth agrees with "**constant**" light speed c irrespective of its energy in Michelson-Morley experiment.

*(Le-2) Photon bends and slows its movement in water ?*

We know that the light speed becomes **slower** in water ( c → 0.8c ).

In fact, Einstein relativity cannot explain why the light is **slower** in different "*medium*".

Because his theory rejected "*medium*"-dependent light speed.

Light refraction is caused by "**different** light speeds" in different mediums.

If Einstein rejected "medium-dependent light", his photon **always** bends its path at *definite* angle in this refraction ?

When the light (= photon ? ) **exits** the water, it is "**accelerated**" to the original "c" again ? It's very unnatural.

This refraction can be explained by classical Snell's law based on **different** light speeds in medium.

**Wavefront** is just a *collection* of different waves generated from new touched water points. It needs spreading "*medium*".

*(Le-3) Einstein energy explains constant light speed ?*

If light is a **photon** particle, why this photon always travels at "c", **cannot** stop ? Light speed is always "c", **independent** of its energy (= wavelength ).

If a photon has mass, it is strange that photons with **different** energy E move at the *same* speed c. So they defined the mass of photon (= light ) as **zero**.

Accouding to Einstein mc^{2} energy, if we insert the mass = 0, its energy E always becomes **zero**, when the light speed "v" is **smaller** than "c".

They argue this is the reason why the light always travels at speed "**c**".

But this Einstein mc^{2} disagrees with de Broglie
wave and two-slit experiment !

So **only** the concept of "light *medium*" is left, compatible with constant light speed "c", refraction, slowness in water and magnetic paradox.

*(Eb-1) Real de Broglie wave in "medium".*

It's a famous story that Einstein **denied** ether (= light *medium* ).

But Michelson-Morley experiment **didn't** deny the medium moving with the earth.

In fact, Einstein relativity includes fatal *paradox*. But universities and the media desperately **hide** them, so almost **no** people know them !

It's known that even a **single** electron *interferes* with itself in doube-slit experiment like "**wave**".

But the current physics **denied** "*medium*", so they have to rely on **un**realistic idea that each electron can pass **both** slits at the same time !

This many-worlds like idea is called "Feynman path", where an electron can go infinite different paths simultaneously !

So Einstein (= deny "medium" ) is the origin of crazy parallel-worlds.

*(Eb-2) Relativistic mass transformation.*

Einstein claimed that a particle's mass looks larger, when it is moving at velocity "v".

Einstein relativity is based on "relative" ( **not** absolute ) motion.

So also when the *observer* moves **instead** of an electron, it's equal to the state where the electron moves in the opposite.

In his theory, momentum (= p ) and energy transform like spacetime by observer's movement.

In fact, this relativistic momentum (mass) causes one of fatal
*(Eb-3) Einstein vs. de Broglie wave interference.*

de Broglie wavelength (= λ = h/p, p = momentum of electron ) was confirmed in various experiments. Relativistic version is this.

It's known that even a **single** electron can cause interference in double-slit experiment, which *obeys* de Broglie relation.

In Eb-3 left, a *stationary* observer sees a **moving** electron at v causing its "de Broglie wave **interference**".

But when this observer moves at the *same* speed as the electron, he sees a "*stationary*" electron, which does **not** cause de Broglie wave interference !

This is clearly a fatal **flaw** of Einstein relativity.

Like Lorentz force, this de Broglie interference **needs** some "*medium*" moving **with** the earth.

Depending on whether each electron is moving with respect to this medium, its de Broglie wavelength is **determined**.

*(Ha-1) Relativistic field theory impact.*

Mismatch between education and the job market is the biggest problem in all fields. In fact, Einstein does **harm** to all students.

Einstein relativity includes **true** paradox, which the media **hides** !

Black hole cannot be formed *within* age of universe.

General relativity is **useless** even in GPS.

Lorentz magnetic force causes "real" paradox.

His mc^{2} **contradicts** de Broglie wave and two-slit experiment.

Einstein affects **all** science fields through *unreal* spin.

So if students ( in **any** fields ) suffering from debt **sue** universities and the media for *hiding* true paradoxes, they would surely **win** back their money.

*(Ha-2) Relativistic field theory derives unreal spin symbols.*

Though the media likes the title, "Einstein's *unfinished* dream", it's about general relativity. Special relativity forms the **basis** of the present physics.

They argue spin-orbit interaction and fine structure in **all** atoms are *Einstein*'s **relativistic** effect.
But electrons *spin* far **exceeds** light speed !

In fact, fine structure does not need **unreal** spin.

Actually, relativistic spin-orbit disagrees with experiment, which they **hide**.

They argue even Pauli exclusion principle is *Einstein*'s relativistic effect.

Dirac combined "spin" and special relativity to derive Pauli exclusion.

The problem is in his relativistic theory, each electron is just a **non**physical symbol (= a^{†} ) with **no** shape, and having flaws.

So this theory just says Pauli exclusion is due to **abstract** anticommutation of fermions' operators. No detailed mechanism is mentioned.

This **abstract** relativistic field theory made the present solid physics **useless**, filled with unreal quasiparticle.

*(Ha-3) ↓ All these theories lack physical reality.*

In Einstein relativity, all fundamental forces are mediated by **unreal** "virtual particles" which disobey Einstein. ← contradiction !

Within nonphysical relativistic formulation, all physicists can do is pursue **artificial** rule, symmetry. **Nobody** knows where this "symmetry" rule came from.

To combine general relativity and quantum mechanics, they need "**fantasy**" 10 dimensional string theory.

Einstein field equation just shows "black hole", which is the reason why they waste their time in imaginary black hole, fruitlessly.

Gravitational wave = pseudotensor has **nothing** to do with Einstein. So even if they claim it has been found, these "doubtful" concepts are **useless**, *forever*.

So Einstein relativity does **harm** to **all** scientific fields and students by its "fictional" theory, and prevents curing diseases.

*(pb-1) ↓ Standard model "unreal" particles.*

They claim that standard model is very successful theory and agrees with every experiment (← ? ). But this claim is a big **lie**.

Because its forces are **virtual**, which is not real particle.

Its strong force, quark = **fractional** change cannot be isolated.

Standard model is *Einstein* "relativistic" quantum field theory. But Einstein relativity includes fatal flaws which they **hide** from students !

The most important force in standard model is "weak force" mediating beta decay.

But unfortunately, this weak (= W ) boson also **lacks** reality.

Because this W particle disobeys energy (= mass ) conservation.

*(pb-2) Beta decay: Neutron → proton + electron ..*

Neutron is **unstable**, which *decays* into a proton and an electron within 10 minutes. This process is called " beta decay".

Neutron and proton have almost the **same** mass.

( To be precise, a neutron is a little heavier than a proton .)

So the **slight** mass difference between a neutron and a proton is **equal** to the final products of an electron (+ neutrino ).

This is quite **natural**, because the total energy (= mass ) must be *conserved*.

*(pb-3) ↓ This heavy W boson violates conservation.*

The problem is W boson, which they claim mediates this beta decay, is 80 times heavier than a proton !

This is very **strange**. Because they claim an initial *neutron* **decays** into a proton (+) and very **heavy** W boson (-).

As I said, the mass difference between a *neutron* and a proton is very **small**, which can **never** reach "80 times proton" mass !

So they start to claim this very heavy W boson is virtual (= **not** real ), which can appear for only a very short time.

This "far-fetched" interpretation is **too** good to be true.

Even in Higgs decay, this W boson is **virtual**, lacking realtiy.

So it's impossible to say the standard model "**giving up** reality" is the most successful theory. ( ← Big lie ! )

*(Et-1) ↓ The media hides true paradoxes !*

It's about time people were **tired** of seeing Einstein for 100 years.

*Einstein* is a "**money**-gathering machine" for
universities and the media.

In fact, Einstein relativity includes **true** paradox.

Black hole cannot be formed *within* age of universe !

General relativity is **useless** even in GPS.

Lorentz magnetic force causes "real" paradox in the moving direction.

His mc^{2} **contradicts** de Broglie wave. "Einstein" does **harm** to all students through **faster**-than-light
spin and *unreal* virtual particles !

I bet, if all students suffering from debt **sue** universities and the media for **hiding** true paradoxes, they would surely *win* !

*(Et-2) ↓ Observer motion affects two-slit interference ?*

You can easily find de Broglie wave **disobeys** Einstein. de Broglie wavelength was experimentally *confirmed*, and used in wavefunctions.

It's known that even an **electron** shows double-slit interferernce.

In Et-2 left, a stationary observer sees a moving electron (= de Broglie wave ) causing two-slit interferernce.

But if this observer starts to *move* in the same direction ( Et-2 right ), the electron looks "at **rest**" in his frame, which causes **no** de Broglie wave !

This is clearly a serious **paradox**. Because depending on the *observer*'s velocity, the electron's de Broglie wave and its interference pattern **change** !

de Broglie wave interferences were confimed in various experiments. So if Einstein relativity **contradicts** matter wave, his theory is **wrong**.

To explain these matter waves, we have to admit some medium moving with the earth, compatible with Michelson-Morley experiment.

*(Rm-1) ↓ ① Einstein relativity causes fatal paradox. *

Einstein relativity includes fatal paradox. But universities and the media desperately **hide** them, so people **don't** notice.

Einstein mc^{2} is believed to be right. We can observe as a particle is closer to the light speed c, it is **harder** to accelerate (= gain mass ? )

In fact, if this effect is due to Einstein relativity, it causes fatal paradox.

So we have to explain this "heavier-like" phenomena by **other** mechanisms.

It is known that a falling object is accelerated **NO** more by gravity due to air resistance, when it reaches "terminal velocity".

Like this, if the *maximum* transmission speed in the medium is light speed c, acceleraing objects is **harder**, as they are closer to c due to *resistance*.

The electromagnetic **force** itself cannot transmit faster-than-light, so it can explain why all object cannot exceed c without Einstein.

*(Rm-2) ↓ Fatal paradox of force. *

If Einstein mass is right, the force F perpendicular to the observer's movement must **change** under Lorentz transformation. See this p.5, this p.15.

This "force" transformation causes fatal paradox, though they **hide** this flaw from ordinary people.

In Rm-2 left, "T-shape" rigid body and an observer are at **rest**.

Along the lower rail, a small thing hung from it is *sliding* to the right.

Forces F applied to the upper (= at rest ) and lower (= moving ) parts are **balanced**, so the whole body remains at rest.

But when the observer starts to **move**, these forces F change **different**ly.

The upper force is weaker, and the lower is stronger, so the whole body moves downward !

This is one of true paradoxes. So if students suffering from debt **sue** universities and the media for **hiding** true paradoxes, they would surely **win** !

*(Rm-3) ↓de Broglie wavelength change ? *

The most decisive reason why Einstein relativity is **wrong** is *de Broglie* wave. In Rm-3 left, when an electron and an observer **stop**, it **doesn't** generate de Broglie wave.

But from the viewpoint of the **moving** observer, the electron is moving in the opposite, which generates de Broglie wave ?

Electron's de Broglie wavelength from the moving observer is λ = h/p.

If special relativity is right, this wavelength must obey Lorentz contraction.

Bu as you see, if the observer ( and an electron ) is at rest, de Broglie wave itself **disappears** ! ( λ' = h/p' = ∞ p' = 0 ) It **contradicts** Lorentz contraction.

Fine structure calculation uses the de Broglie relation, which **doesn't** obey Lorentz contraction. So relativistic mass is **not** by relativity but by "*resistance*".

Black hole **cannot** be formed. Einstein relativity **hampers**
all students through faster-than-light spin and virtual particles ! So it's only the media topic.

*(Ei-1) ↓ Lorentz transformation - different clock times. *

Recent news are flooded with 100 years of Einstein relativity. But unfortunately this theory has fatal flaw. We are not lost without Einstein's GPS.

Black hole cannot be formed within age of universe !
I bet, if students suffering from debt **sue** univeresities and the media for forcing useless
science, they would **win**.

According to Einstein relativity, moving observer sees "**different** spacetime". Ei-1 left is *rest* frame (= S ) at the time **t = 0**.

From the viewpoint of the moving observer (= S' ), the clocks placed at x = 0 and 1 give **different** times, if you insert t = 0 into Lorentz transformation.

Of course, moving observer can see events at "only **one** t' time".

So all events at t=0 in S frame **cannot** be seen simultaneously in the moving S' frame.

*(Ei-2) ↓ When a rigid rod is moving upward..*

In Ei-2, a **rigid** rod is moving upward along a rigid rail.

Surprisingly, from moving observer, this rigid rod looks bent !

In Ei-2 right, the clock time is t' = 0 in **moving** frame.

The clock time (= t' ) in moving frame is different from the rest frame (= t ).

To get the common t' = 0 in S' frame using Lorentz tranformation, **different** S times ( t = 0 or v/c^{2} ) have to be inserted in different positions x = 0, 1.

This rod is moving **upward**, so these different t times gives **different** positions in the **upper** direction. (= the *right* in S' is the *future* (= upper ) in S. )

This is the reason why this **rigid** rod is **bent** (= the right part is upper ).

This "bent rigid body" is strange !

*(Ei-3) ↓ When a rigid rod turns right ...*

The fatal **paradox** appears when the rail turns *right* in Ei-3.

The right part in S' frame shows the **future** event in S frame.

So when the rod is just moving upward, it is just bent diagnally to the right.

Of course, even if we pull this **rigid** rod to the right, it **cannot** be extended (①).

But when the rod is **close** to the turning point (②), if we pull this rod, it can be easily **warped** and extended along the rail !

This is clearly a fatal **paradox**. Because in the state of ①, this rod **cannot** be deformed, even if we pulled it. Because it is **rigid**.

But when the rod is close to the turning poit, the **same** rigid rod can be easily *deformed* by pulling it ! ←clearly contradiction !

So Einstein can easily bend "rigid" body by the power of Lorentz transformation ! Furthermore, the relativity can change the "**future**" shape without touching !

So Einstein relativity with fatal paradox is clearly **wrong**.

It needs **unreal** virtual particles, which **violate** relativity, as forces ! The end.

*(Ha-1) Massless Dirac quasipaticle is unreal.*

This *Harvard* news uses **vague** expression, "extreme non-classical transport". What do they mean ? This research is useful for us ?

Unfortunately, this research just **wastes** money. See the paper (p.4).

They mention "**massless** Dirac particle", which means quasiparticle.

Surprisingly, this particle moves far slower than light speed despite "**massless**". It **contradicts** Einstein's relativity, where massless particles **always** travel at light speed.

So this particle **lacks** reality, which is the reason why it's called quasiparticle.

The problem is by measuring ejected **electrons** with *mass*, they misinterpret them as massless quasiparticle. ← clearly "self-contradiction".

*(Ha-2) Fantasy quantum mechanics needs quasiparticle.*

Why the present researches have to depend on **unreal** quasiparticle ? Because the current basic physics (= quantum mechanics ) is wrong.

If the basic physical model is **wrong** and lacks reality, physicists have to rely on "**finctional**" particle to describe actual phenomena.

I bet, unless we change "**imaginary**" basic physics, worthless degree problem in all fields would **never** be solved !

Students suffering from debt should **sue** universities and the media for forcing
useless science.

Black hole clearly **cannot** be formed within age of universe.

This Harvard guy also deals with unreal "fractional" charge quasiparticle and 10-dimensional string.

As you see, the present science has gone the **wrong** way.

*(H+-1) One electron H2+ has Schrodinger solution ?*

In fact, "quantum mechanics is spectacularly successful" is a big **lie**, fabricated by commercial universities to justify *exorbitant*
tuition.

It is known that Schrodinger equation has NO exact solution except hydrogen atom, which agrees with Bohr model ( see historical magic ).

Because Schrodinger's hydrogen also satisfies an **integer** times de Broglie wavelength, though it is a little **distorted**.

They say one-electron hydrogen molecule ion (H2+) also can be solved (?), but I bet you **cannot** find any concrete solutions in any textbooks !

In fact, even H2+ has NO exact solution. It can be estimated only numerically, where they must choose covenient tools from different approaches ( this p.2 ).

So "H2+ molecule ion is *solvable*" is a big **lie**, again !

*(H+-2) ↓All three states have the same total energy ?*

Why Schrodinger equation **cannot** solve multi-electron atoms ?

Schrodinger solution **always** spreads in **all** space, different from Bohr's planetary orbit.

So we must find a solution, which has a **single** "*common*" ground state energy in **every** electrons' position in **all** space.

So it's much **easier** to find two-dimensional "linear" Bohr's orbit than to find "three-dimensional = **all** space" Schrodinger solution !

In multi-electron helium, Schrodinger solution must meet much more **strict** condition. It includes electron-electron Coulomb interaction (= distance |r_{12}| ).

"*Solving* Schrodinger's helium" means we find a **single** ground state energy in **all** electrons' positions. But we cannot, so just choose "**fake**" solution.

When we choose approximately two hydrogen trial function as helium ( this p.7 ), **all** three states ( ① - ③ ) in upper figure must have the **same** total energy.

But as two electrons come **closer** to each other, its total energy becomes **higher**, which makes us **unable** to get a "single *common*" ground state energy in helium.

Two electrons have to classically **avoid** each other to obey a **single** total energy.

*(Bl-1) 10 dimensional black hole is just fiction.*

In fact, black hole **cannot** exist now.

Einstein relativity argues the clock **time** stops due to severe gravitational time dilation on the surface of black hole.

So it needs an infinite amount of time to form black hole !

It means black hole does not exist seen from the distant observer ( see this #2 ).

Students suffering from debt and worthless degree should **sue** universities and the media for hiding true paradox and **impossible** black hole formation !

These are **true** faults, so I bet they will surely **win**.

In fact, GPS **doesn't** need relativity, which hampers all science.

AdS of this Harvard paper **lacks** physical grounds. It needs 10 dimensional string theory. It's impossible to prove *fantasy* extradimension, forever.

*(Bl-2) ↓ The present physics lacks reality.*

What's the meaning of entanglement essential to space-time ?

First, it cannot send superluminal information, so physically **useless**.

They say fictional wormhole makes faster-than-light travel possible. But there is no evidence of it. It relates to **unreal** negative mass.

Surprisingly, physicists try to **connect** this fictional wormhole with **faster**-than-light entanglement through string theory !

I emphasize that these extradimensions and faster-than-light travel have **NO** physical grounds, and **cannot** be confirmed.

Harvard's original paper (p.7) **lacks** clear picture of each particle. They just show abstract symbol (= c^{†} ) as each particle. So useless.

I'm afraid that posdocs will end up **wasting** their precious time in "imaginary" black hole, and destroy their career.

*(Qu-1) ↓ Just "choose" convenient function.*

**Curing** fatal *diseases* such as cancer, ALS, Altzheimer .. is the **ultimate** *goal* of human. Our human body is a sophisticated "nano machine".

To understand and manipulate each enzyme behavior, it is indispensable to **predict** exact electron-electron interaction.

But quantum mechanics has **NO** ability to predict molecular behavior, so it is **not** applied to other science. See *unreal* quasiparticle.

The main reason is Schrodinger equation can not solve **multi**-electron atoms. They just choose convenient trial functions compatible with experiment.

In choosing some function, there are **infinite** kinds of choices !

It's **impossibe** to try *all* kinds of large functions.

"Choosing" means "artificial" or "**not** predictable", so useless quantum mechanics !

*(Qu-2) "Average" is a collection of different energies.*

If they **cannot** solve Schrodinger equation of multi-electrons, how do they get the energy E value ? In fact, this energy E **does't** mean *truth* !

They just insert **chosen** trial function (= ψ_{He} ) into integral over *all* space.

So this gotten E' energy is "average" energy in **all** space.

Of course, there must be only **one** true *ground state* (= lowest ) energy E.

But this "average" E is a **collection** of many **different** energies in different positions.

So finding the lowest energy inside these "fake" average energies E' **doesn't** mean truth.

True ground state energy E must be found **within** exact Schrodinger *solutions*. But multi-electrons have no exact solutions.

Only classical approach (= computing each Coulomb force, and de Broglie wave at each different point ) can give a **single** *true* ground state energy.

*(So-1) "Faster-than-light" spin feels relativity ?*

Why do worthless degrees remain the **biggest** problem all over the world ? Because *universities* concentrate **only** on entertainment ( this, this ), rather than science.

Students suffering from debt should **sue** universities and the media for **hiding** true *contradiction* and impossible
black hole formation.

These are clearly **true** faults, so I bet they will surely **win**.

This news is contradictory, too ? Volkswagen defeat device is **banned**, but legal ?

Today's Science paper deals with "spin-orbit" coupling.

The present physics argues this spin-orbit is **relativistic** of Einstein.

But electron spin lacks reality, its spinning **exceeds** light speed ( this p.2 ) ! In fact, "spin-orbit" coupling **contradicts** experiment ( this, this ).

It means Einstein relativity **hampers** all science, harmful to all students !

*(So-2) Fit imaginary spin-orbit model to experiment !*

Then why do academic papers often mention "spin-orbit", despite unreality ? Because they use "**imaginary**" (= not actual ) spin-orbit *model* !

In original paper (p.7), they use fictional **effective** mass and magnetic field. This effective mass is **different** from actual electron mass.

So this fictional effective mass can be bigger and **smaller** than actual electron mass ( this p.2 left ) to fit experiment !

This effective mass can be **negative** ( this p.3 ). These **unreal** concpets were introduced to **fit** wrong "spin-orbit" model to experiment *by force*.

As you see, the present physics must depend on unreal quasiparticle and effective mass to fit quantum theory to experiment ! So useless.

*(Ha-1) "ab-initio", "first-principle" is a big lie.*

Worthless *university* degree is the **biggest** problem all over the world, causing mismatch in labor market.

This paper claims "*ab-initio*" model can be a basis of many-body physics.

Is this **Harvard**'s claim right ?

Ab-initio (= first-principle ) means all atomic energies can be successfully predicted **only** from Schrodinger equation and Pauli exclusion.

But Schrodinger equations of multi-electron atoms cannot be solved. So all we can do is choose basis-set functions. ←Not ab-initio, so **useless**.

Though density functional theory (= DFT ) is called " ab-initio" method, it is **misleading**. Its *multi*-electron part (= V_{ex} ) is **unknown** ( this p.2 ).

So they just **freely** select convenient functionals (= DFT is **not** ab-initio, **useless** ). NO functional is accurate for all properties of interest ( this p.17 ).

*(Ha-2) "arbitrary" exchange-correlation functional*

This Harvard paper (p.2) **chose** some specific functional (= PBE ) as "ab-initio". The same Harvard group combined **unreal** quasiparticle and LDA as ab-initio.

Relying on unreal **quasi**particle means all
applied science is **hampered**. So universities must *return* exorbitant tuition to students suffering from debt !

In this caltech paper, they first chose above PBE functional, but it gave **incorrect** answers. So they **changed** to other more convenient functional.

So this ab-initio DFT is **not** useful method to predict some energies.

Because they just "**select**" some good functionals out of many choices !

Even inside above PBE exchange correlation functionals, they can **freely** adjust some *paramters* to fit experimental results ( this p.7 )

So the boring cliche, "quantum mechanics is the most successful theory" is a big **lie**, fabricated by ( top ) commercial universities to justify *exorbitant* tuition !

*(Ev-1) GPS, PET are the only practical use ?*

We need Einstein relativity every day ?

In fact, the **only** *practical* use of relativity is GPS.

You may feel **strange** about a recent wsj article quoting Einstein (?) GPS.

Because the relation between relativity and GPS is a very **old** story ( in 1985 ).

If they are **confident** that Einstein relativity is absolutely *right*, why does wsj, one of the largest media, need to **repeatedly** emphasize it now ?

If Einstein relativity suvived 100 years, passing every test (?), why do physicists need to repeat meaningless test to prove relativity ?

In fact, GPS does NOT need Einstein. GPS is affected largely by *atmospheric* medium. Inaccurate time difference is unknown, gotten from four satellites' data.

Also about antimatter, the only practical use (?), PET can be explained by electron capture, **not** needing "positron emission".

*(Ev-2) Tunneling happens only in very short ( ~nm ) barrier.*

I bet if educational victims suffering from loan **sue** universities and the media for **hiding** true paradox and impossible
black hole, they would surely **win**.

They claim Einstein relavitiy is a basis of **all** physics, so it hampers all science ! It's **dangerous** breakthrough prize urges relativity, ignoring flaw.

Quantum mechanics is used every day in smartphones ?

But the present physics lacks reality. They mention quantum tunnel.

Though quantum **tunnel** argues an electron can tunnel through some barrier (= insulator ), the definition of this "barrier" is very **vague**.

In fact, the length of this barrier (= insulator ) needs to be very **short** (= nanometer ! ) to cause tunnel.

See scanning microscope ( ~1 nm ) and transistor ( 12 nm ).

It's **natural** a small amount of electrons pass very **short** "insulator" under some voltage.

So "**everyday** Einstein and quantum mechanics !" is **false** advertisement for universities to justify exorbitant tuition !

*(Bi-1) Many-worlds, quasiparticle are a basis of science ?*

*Rising* university fee is the biggest problem all over the world.

Even if you study biology and physics, the degrees are **useless**, causing skill mismatch.

I wonder why almost **No** governments question whether universities *really* teach useful (?) things. Getting Nobel prize is everything ?

Without **Nobel** prize, science in university is of **no** use ?

The media's hype is one of reasons, which destroy students' career ?

Their main reason is the basic physics **lacks** reality ( see many worlds ).

Schrodinger equation cannot solve muti-electrons, so useless.

Electron spin lacks reality, its spinning **exceeds** light speed ( this p.2 ).

So quantum mechanics relies on **unreal** quasi and virtual particles !

If basic physics lacks reality, all applied science is **hampered** !

So all students including lawyer are forced to pay exorbitant tuition for **nothing**.

*(Bi-2) Biology still relies on Old technique = PCR, cDNA. *

**All** biological processes ( enzymes ) depend on interactions among **electrons**.
So knowing precise electrons' behavior is indispensable for curing fatal cancer, ALS, Altzheimer ..

But quantum mechanics is so useless that molecular biologists **don't** use it at all ! The present biotechnology was established in old 1970s, and we still rely on them now.

Everybody can **easily** do these biology experiments using kit and manual. Commercial enzymes can do all RNA, cDNA synthesis,
PCR and recombination.

These commercial enzymes were extracted from natural bacteria.

We **cannot** design and make artificial enzyme from scratch !

GFP fluorescence technique was gotten from *jellyfish*.

Antibody for protein immunofluorescence is produced by old methods immunizing rabbit ..

So there are **No** other methods than finding "natural" enzymes or medical herbs.

It takes much time and depends on "good luck".

Even if some side effects happen, we **cannot** handle them **without** knowledge of precise molecular mechanism !

*(Mi-1) ↓Creation (= a ^{†} ) and annihilation (= a ) of each particle ?*

Worthless degree problems continue. I wonder why almost **No** governments question whether **universities** really teach useful (?) things.

This showy MIT news may make you feel as if universities were doing "cutting-edge" research. But in fact, these are just "*exaggeration*" to collect money.

They say when photon hits chromophore, it produce "exciton", which is a **unreal** quasiparticle. Why do they rely on "quasiparticle" instead of "real" particle ?

Because the present physics has **no** ability to give "concrete" figure of each particle. All it can do is create and annihilate each particle.

They just put electron (= c^{†} ) and hole (= β^{†} ) side by side, and call it "exciton" ( this p.11 ) All these are **nonphysical** symbols with **no** shape.

*(Mi-2) Compare exciton particles in 1978 and 2015 !*

The problem is all universities and the media just show **colorful** pictures, **hiding** truth. So ordinary people **don't** know about unreal quasiparticle !

Research on "exciton" is progressing ? See MIT 1978 paper p.3.

They just expressed each exciton as *abstract* symbol (= a^{†} ) with **no** shape.

Compare it with the latest Caltech 2015 paper p.2

Exciton is still the same *abstract* symbol (= a^{†} ) with **no** shape.

As you see, studies in unreal exciton have made **no** progress.

So universities just **waste** exorbitant tuition and tax in useless things, forever !

To hide these inconvenient facts, they concentrate **only** on ( social ) media to **mislead** people and governments, using top prizes as a "bait".

Also in "pie-in-the-sky" quantum computer, university uses bloggers to mislead people into feeling as if their researches were progressing steadily.

See also the previous version of criticizing top journals.

Solid, Fine structure

Higgs,
Topological, Old quantum.

BigBang Nature,
Nobel, QED

2015/11/12 updated. Feel free to link to this site.