Top page ( Quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity are wrong )

*(Fig.1) Quantum field theory lacks reality.*

In fact, quantum field theory and QED are a completely unsuccessful useless theory.

When you want to know what the **photon** actually is, the present physics **forces** you to learn quantum field theory.

What the heck is this quantum field theory ?

In fact, this quantum field theory is just a collection of **meaningless** *symbols*.

Quantum field theory was made by combining quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity.

Quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) using unreal virtual particles and Higgs also belong to this category.

The **only** theory of everyhing 10 spacetime dimensional string ( or M ) theory was gotten, adding general relativity to it.

Unfortunately, all these quantum field theories **lack** reality, and useless for us.

*(Fig.2) ↓ Quantum field theory governs all particles.*

Though the media likes to **mislead** people using showy images about particle physics, these images are all **fake**.

Ordinary people don't know the fact that *abstract* quantum filed theory **governs** all particles such as electron,
quark and neutrino ..

Einstein relation of mc^{2} is applied to this relativistic Dirac equation, which is the basis of *unreal* QED, Higgs and forces.

All these quantum field theories have **No** ability to show concrete atomic pictures, so they lack reality.

In fact, they **hide** true paradox of Einstein relativity, which **destroys** all student's careers now !

*(Fig.3) Stationary observer (= K ) sees a stationary truck.*

Einstein derived famous equation which governs the energy (= E ) and momentum (= p ) of each particle.

Suppose a stationary observer (= K ) sees a **stationary** truck with a mass **m _{0}**.

Einstein claimed even this truck at rest has large energy E = m

The proof of this rest mass energy depends on "antiparticle".

But this elusive antiparticle can be replaced by electron capture in PET.

Furthermore, the antiparticle violates basic physical rule of momentum conservation.

The point is antiparticle **cannot** be generated only from the "light" in the reverse process of annihilation. It must rely on collision with other **metals**, so doubtful.

This Einstein's hypothesis of mc^{2} **lacks** direct physical proofs.

*(Fig.4) Energy (= E ) and momentum (= p ) of a truck seen from K'.*

Einstein relativity is based on "relative ( not absolute ) motion".

An observer (= K' ) moving at a speed v sees the stationary truck in Fig.4.

Seen from this **moving** observer, a stationary truck appears to be **moving** in the *opposite* direction at v.

Einstein claims the mass of this truck looks heavier, when it appears to be moving.

So the energy (= E ) and momentum (= p ) of the stationary truck become this, seen from moving observer K'.

The point is these are just "Einstein **artificial** definition" which has **nothing** to do with the original Lorentz transformation.

*(Fig.5) Relativistic momentum (= p ), energy (= E ).*

From this and this, we can get Einstein's most important relation using relativistic energy (= E ) and momentum (= p ).

The point is the right hand side of Fig.5 always becomes **constant** =(mc^{2})^{2} regardless of **any** relative velocities "v".

This Einstein important relation is the **basis** of all quantum field theories such as QED, Higgs, and string theory.

These artificial energy and momentum transform like ( t, x, y, z ) under Lorentz transformation ( see this p.2 )

*(Fig.6) ↓ Linear Dirac equation contains spin ?*

Dirac equation is the **most** important one which forms the basis of **all** quantum field theories. The problem is its form is very **unrealistic**.

Relativistic Dirac equation was gotten by dividing Einstein quadratic relation into **linear** functions.

In compensation for linear function, Dirac equation must contain 4 × 4 gamma (= γ ) matrices, which consist of spin Pauli matrices (= σ ).

This is the reason they claim Dirac equation succeeded in combining "spin" and relativity. But "σ = spin ?" is just *artificial* definition with **No** grounds.

*(Fig.7) ↓ Relativistic Dirac equation governs all particles.*

The problem is this Einstein important relation between energy and momentum includes fatal **paradoxes**.

It means all quantum field theories based on Dirac equation are **wrong**.

This Einstein momentum is inconsistent with de Broglie wave of electron.

Another fatal paradox is related to force.

These paradoxes are **hidden** by the media and universities from people !

Lorentz transformation itself includes true paradox.

To solve these all paradoxes, we have to admit some medium with the earth.

The *faster* the particle is moving, the stronger the **resistance** around the particles becomes.

It is the reason why it's harder to accelerate the faster particle (= looks heavier ? ) The **maxium** speed of electric field accelerating particle is "c".

*(Fig.8) Interference pattern of a single electron is seen.*

Electron's de Broglie wave relation was confirmed in a lot of experiments using double-slits. de Broglie wavelength λ = h/mv, v is electron's **velocity**.

Electron's de Broglie wavelength using relativistic momentum (= p ) is this.

A stationary observer watches the electron moving at a speed "v".

This electron generates its de Broglie wave and causes **interference** on the screen.

*(Fig.9) ↓ Seen from an observer moving with an electron,*

Another observer is moving at the **same** velosity as the electron.

So seen from this moving observer, the electron looks **stationary**.

This "*stationary*-looking" electron causes **No** de Broglie wave, and **No** interference pattern is seen on the screen ! This is clearly a **paradox**.

*(Fig.10) de Broglie wave appears or disappears ?*

When observers at rest and moving at v watch the **same** electron, they see the **different** interference patterns on the **same** screen ?

Seen from an observer at rest watching the same electron, the interference of de Broglie wave is recorded on the screen.

But seen from a moving observer, the electron appears to **stop**, so **neither** de Brolgie wave nor its interference of the electron can be seen !

This de Broglie wave *paradox* clearly shows Einstein famous relation is false. de Broglie relation of the electron **disobeys** Lorentz contraction.

*(Fig.11) Quantum field theory cannot describe a concrete electron.*

All quantum field theories are based on relativistic Dirac equation.

How is each **electron** described in this quantum field theory ?

The problem is these quantum field theories have **No** ability to describe **concrete** figure and motion of each particle.

All it can show is an *abstract* and simple **symbol** "c" as an **electron**.

The detailed derivation is this.

*(Fig.12) It can do only two simple actions: create and vanish !*

Any quantum field theories **cannot** describe *actual* electrons.

It only shows a single **letter** (= "c ") as an electron.

Using this single letter, all quantum field theory can do is **two** actions: create and annihilate each electron !

When you see an electron ( here "a" ) and
a photon, you will find the quantum field theory is valueless and **useless** for us.

*(Fig.13) Dirac field describes all electron, quark, neutrino ?*

Relativistic Dirac equation is supposed to describe "fermion".

"Fermion" includes electron, quark and neutrino.

It means all these particles are desctibed as a "single letter" like electron. So quantum field theory **cannot** express each particle as an **actual** object.

Unless quantum field theory can explain actual, **concrete** state of each particle, it is completely **useless** and meaningless for us, forever.

*(Fig.14) Emitted photon must always be "virtual", not real.*

It is said that quantum field theory (= QED ) can describe how each electron emits a photon (= **light** ).

But in fact, this quantum field theory can show **nothing** useful for these electron and photon.

An electron (= c ) and photon (= a ) are just abstract **nonphysical** symbols, so this emission process by quantum field theory is meaningless.

Furthermore, emitted photon in quantum field theory must be always " virtual" particle, which **disobeys** Einstein relation from the beginning.

So all relativistic quantum field theory is self-contradictory, of course, of **No** value for our daily lives.

*(Fig.15) Photoelectric effect and Coulomb by quantum field theory ?*

In quantum field theory, all reactions including photoelectric effect must be described using abstract Feynman diagram.

The problem is all these processes in quantum field theory are always accompanied by **unreal** virtual particles. See Coulomb interaction.

Why are they called "virtual" particle instead of "real" particle ?

For example, the mass squared of virtual photon can be **negative** violating Einstein relativity ( this p.5 ).

So photoelectric effect and Coulomb interaction by quantum field theory have **nothing** to do with actual phenomena, and **useless** for us.

*(Fig.16) Pauli exclusion principle = anticommutation of two symbols ?*

Pauli exclusion principle claims two electrons cannot be in the same kind of state in orbital and spin, though spin is too weak to cause this.

It is said relativistic quantum field theory can explain why this Pauli exclusion principle occurs. But it is a big **lie**.

All quantum field theory can show is anticommutaton of two electrons' symbols. That's all. **No** more detailed is mentioned.

If two electrons are in the same state ( c_{1} = c_{2} ), these c must be **zero**, when exchanging them reverses the whole sign (= anticommutation ).

So c_{1} and c_{2} must be different states from each other.
**No** more detailed mechanism in Pauli principle is mentioned in quantum field theory !

Quantum field theory does **NOT** try to clarify further mechanism in Pauli exclusion than this meaningless exchange relation.

*(Fig.17) Virtual particle, Higgs, 10 dimensional string are unreal.*

The conclusion is that quantum field theory based on Einstein relativity describes **nothing** about actual phenomena.

It just shows meaningless math symbol as each particle.

This is the reason all Higgs and string theory are **out** of touch with reality.

*(Fig.18) Feynman said QED is hocus-pocus.*

Though you may often hear quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) is one of most successful theories, it is a big **lie**.

The problem is the calculation results of QED always diverge to infinity ! So they started to artificially remove a **part** of infinity by renormalization.

Infinity can be divided into other infinity and any **arbitrary** finite value.

If we remove this excessive infinity, we can get **any** finite value as we like.

This artificial trick is everything. QED is **NOT** a successful theory at all.

Even founder, Feynman said "QED is hocus-pocus, and mathematically **not** consistent".

*(Fig.19) Quantum field theory is Not physics !*

The conclusion is that the present physics including quantum field theory **cannot** be called "physics".

It is filled with meaningless and mathematically inconsistent ideas.

Even Dirac said "it's a stop-gap procedure, there must be fundamental change as from Bohr's orbit to quantum mechanics".

Feynman, Dirac, **nobody** accepted fantasy 10 dimensional string theory. The root of all evils is quantum mechanics which is just **false**.

*(Fig.20) If we can see each single atom, what can we do next ?*

Using atomic force microscope (= AFM ), we can observe each **atom** directly. AFM can get informations by "trouching" and "feeling" the surface of atoms.

These informations of each atom includes various useful things such as **electrical** forces, potential and conductivity **inside** a single atom.

Then if we utilize this powerful AFM, we can know the **concrete** electron's behavior inside each atom ?

Unfortunately, the unrealistic quantum mechanics **prevents** us from doing it !

*(Fig.21) DFT cannot predict any electron's behavior.*

For example, this news say, they could first get images of each molecule using atomic force microscope.

But when we see their paper ( Fig.3 ), you find they depend on density functional theory (= DFT ) as electron's model.

The problem is DFT just chooses artificial electron's functions as we like, so DFT has **NO** ability to predict any values and electron's behavior !

Other cases using atomic force microscope also depend on **useless** DFT model. See this p.13.

Quantum mechanics can **neither** solve nor handle multi-electron atoms, because it discard two basic preconditions.

We must determine the more precise electronic motion model step by step, comparing experiments (= AFM data ) and the **consistent** model's prediction, giving up false quantum mechanics.

And when we try to manipulate each electron's behavior using electromagnetic wave, QED based on unreal virtual photon is an **obstacle**.

*(Fig.22) Electron interaction term is freely chosen. ← useless*

In larger atoms in condended matter physics, density functional theory (= DFT ) is the **only** computing method even in atomic force microsopy.

It is often said this DFT is successful "ab-initio" method ( this p.3 ).

"Ab-initio" means first-principle which can predict values without empirical parameter ?

Unfortunately this DFT has **No** ability to predict any values, so **useless**.

Like this, DFT just **chooses** some convenient functional out of *infinie* choices.

In DFT, "exchange correlation functional" means interelectronic repulsions. This functional is **unknown**, can be *freely* determined ( this p.2 ).

So DFT can be considered a semi-**empirical** method, *different* from media-hype ( this p.23 )

2016/3/4 updated. Feel free to link to this site.