*(Fig.1) How does quantum mechanics describe solid physics ?*

In fact, **all** people in the world are **deceived** into believing the present quantum mechanics is useful for the latest technology by the media.

This is a big lie to keep **dirty** vested interests and exorbitant tuition.

OK, then, how the present quantum mechanics describes the actual phenomena ?

Condensed matter physics by quantum mechanics is filled with **unreal** quasiparticles, so completely **useless** and waste of time !

*(Fig.2) An electron is a meaningless "letter" in quantum mechanics.*

Suprisingly, the present quantum mechanics can show only a **non**physical letter (= c^{†}, c ) as an electron. That's all it can do, so **useless**.

The is the reason the quantum mechanics is **useless**, just pursues "fantasy".

*(Fig.3) Quantum mechanics can do only this ↓ in each electron !*

Probably almost **no** ordinary people know the present physics is **useless**.

All quantum mechanics can do is **two** simple actions in each particle.

An electron can only be created (= c^{†} ) or annihilated (= c ) by quantum mechanics. That's all.

As you feel, it's **impossible** to describe actual complicated and dynamical physical phenomena using **only** these "too simple" actions !

So if physicists try to describe more complicated phenomena, all they can do is fabricate **artificial** quasiparticle, which doesn't really exist.

*(Fig.4) Quasiparticle = trick with nonphysical symbols.*

A recent top journal still deals with *unreal* quasiparticle, exciton

This "exciton" is **Not** a real particle, but a quasiparticle.

Quasiparticle "exciton" is just a pair of electron (= c^{†} ) and its hole (= β^{†} ).

**NO** physical shape in this **nonphysical** symbol.

Polariton is also *unreal* quasiparticle. Polariton consists of a pair of exciton and photon ( this (15) , this (12) ). That's all. It's **not** a modern physics !

In this way, all the present physics can do is make **artificial** quasiparticles ( this, this ). So **useless**. People are deceived, because universities hide this truth !

As a result, almost **No** ordinary people know the present solid physics is filled with **unreal** "*quasi*particle" and does harm to all applied science.

*(Fig.5) "Electron oscillation" generates unreal "phonon" particles ?*

You can often see "phonon" in various news of journal and universities even now. What the heck does this "phonon" mean ?

In fact, this **phonon** is Not an actual particle such as electron and proton.

When an electron is **vibrating**, they try to describe that state using phonon.

How do physicists create this artificial phonon particle ?

Phonon quasiparticle consists of electron's dislocation and momentum.

So this phonon just means "each **electron**'s *behavior*", not an independent particle. It's a very **strange** concept.

*(Fig.6) Phonon remain unreal, forever.*

Phonon is fictitious quasi particle, which does Not really exist. It means quantum mechanics pursues **unreal** particles in sold physics.

In "real" science, we must try to descibe all physical phenomena using "**real**" particles. But quantum mechanics has **given up** it !

They **stop** pursuing deeper truth, after fabricating artificial quasiparticles.
This attitude completely violates the purpose of the science.

This is the reason the present physics and all applied science have stopped their progress, and universities remain **useless**.

*(Fig.7) ↓ This is the reason why "phonon" is fiction.*

Quantum mechanics claims phonon is related to other particles' vibration. This logic is **irrational** and crazy !

It means when an atom ( or electron ) starts to **oscillate**, then phonons are created, if the oscillation **stops**, phonons *disappear*.

Thinking commonsensically, this ridiculous particle does **NOT** exist in our real world. But quantum mechanics depends on it !

It's surprising that even Nobel prize accepted this **strange** phonon.

*(Fig.8) They just put nonphysical symbols side by side.*

How does quantum mechanics decribe interaction between phonon and other electrons ? In fact, quantum mechanics can do **nothing** about it !

All they can do is **put** nonphysical letters side by side as the interaction, where neighboring electron (= c^{†} ) and phonon (= b^{†} ) interact with each other ?

So quantum mechanics has **No** ability to describe actual, more complicated phenomena than these *abstract* math symbols ( this p.9 ).

Furthermore, the phonons interacting with electrons are "**virtual** phonon", Not a "real phonon" ( this p.7 ).

So condensed matter physics based on quasiparticle is incoherent, illogical, and there is no way it can be accepeted like radiation.

*(Fig.9) ↓ Bogoliubov quasiparticle = create + annihilate electron ?*

Even in superconductor, quantum mechanics depends on unreal Bogoliubov
quasiparticle, which **doesn't** really exist.

How is this fictitous Bogoliubov quasiparticle created ?

They say this quasiparticle consists of creation and annihilation of an **electron**.

It means *Bogoliubov* is a mixture of an electron appearing and disappearing ? Then the total becomes "**zero** particle" ( this p.4 ) ?
Very strange.

This is the reason why this irrational quasiparticle cannot be called "real particle". Of course, **useless**.

This unreal Bogoliubov quasiparticle is used in fictional Hawking radiation.

*(Fig.10) ↓ Quantum mechanics cannot describe actual superconductor.*

Then how does quantum mechanics apply these **unreal** quasiparticles to actual superconductor ?

To apply fictional particles, they have to define **artificial** equation, first.

Each electron can be expressed as only "create" and "annihilate" operators.

So the basic procedure of useless quantum mechanics is,

① Choose artificial equation → ② Replace it by unreal quasiparticle.

All these equation and quasiparticle transformation are artificially made, **Not** representing the actual nature ( this p.19 ).

We must quit meaningless math trick immediately and aim to describe actual phenomena using **only** "*real* concepts" for making the present physics useful.

*(Fig.11) Fractional quantum Hall effect is due to fractional-charge anyon ?*

When applying electromagnetic fields to some semiconductors, the electric conductance (= 1/resistance ) appears to be quantized.

After physicists defined the theory of this quantum Hall effect, they realized this theory **cannot** explain more complicated conductance.

So they created illogical concepts such as fractional-charge, *anyon*.

The point is this anyon is **Not** real, but a fictitious
quasiparticle.

We have **neither** observed nor isolated these **fictional** particles.

But quantum mechanics **cannot** describe physical facts without unreal quasiparticle !

Because quantum mechanics is too abstract and too **inflexible** to handle complex phenonema.

We need to use more realistic model to describe actual facts without nonsense quasiparticle.

*(Fig.12) But they mistake "ejected electron" for unreal quasiparticle.*

Recently, **massless** Dirac fermion is a hot topic in solid physics. But this particle is unreal quasiparticle, again.

When illuminating some material ( ex. topological insulator or graphite ), an electron is ejected by photoelectric effect.

After measuring the energy, momentum of the ejected electron, they jumped to the wrong conclusion that **massless** Dirac quasiparticle existed inside material.

So they **cannot** observe this fictitious Dirac quasiparticle, they just detect only the ejected *electron*.

*(Fig.13) Quasiparticle contradicts basic physical principle.*

How **fast** is this massless (= **zero** mass ) Dirac fermion moving ?

Einstein relativity claims massless particle always moves at light speed c.

But they say this massless Dirac quasiparticle moves **slower** than the light speed, 0.3 percent of c ( this p.4 ).

This Dirac quasiparticle **contradicts** Einstein relativity, so unreal.

Furthermore, it depends on pseudo-spin.

*(Fig.14) Measuring photoelectron → "massless" electron ?*

This **massless** Dirac fermion is slower than the light speed, which violates relativity. They claim this *massless* fermion was observed
by photoemission using
this.

"Photoemission" means observing ejected " electron" with *mass*, but they **misinterpret** it as "massless". So this "**massless** fermion" is self-contradictory.

They measured the energy and momentum of the electron ejected by photon (= light ), and speculate that this electron behaves like "massless" inside material.

They believe that parallel component of the electron's momentum (= hk ) remains the **same** inside and outside of material. This is just wrong.

In photoelectric effect, photon's momentum cannot be transferred to electron, because photon and electron have **different** masses.

We have to consider the whole atom. So this interpretation of experiment (= ARPES ) is theoretically **wrong**, and massless Dirac quasiparticle is illusion.

*(Fig.15) Quantum mechanics depends on unreal quasiparticle.*

Mojorana fermion is a hypothetical particle which has the **same** form of particle and antiparticle.

In condensed matter physics, Majorana fermion is just a quasiparticle, which does **Not** really exist, again.

This fictitious Majorana quasiparticle is made from electron's creation and annihilation symbols.

*(Fig.16) Majorana quasiparticle was observed in superconductor ?*

They claim this Majorana quasiparticle can be detected in special superconducting wire. Of course, **unreal** quasiparticle itself cannot be seen.

In Fig.16, they put normal (= red ) and superconducting (= purple ) materials on some wire. On this borderline, they detected complex electric **conductance**.

So they just measured complex "electric conductance", and interpreted it as fictional "Majorana" quasiparticle ( this p.3 ) That's all.

Fictitious quasiparticle itself can **neither** be isolated nor confirmed.

This (mis)interpretation is based on some artificial definition.

*(Fig.17) ↓ Artificial definition of Majorana quasiparticle.*

How is this Majorana quasiparticle made ? Quantum mechanics can use **only** two nonphysical symbols as an electron.

So all they can do is combine these two types of abstract **electron**'s operators to make artificial *Majorana* quasiparticle.

They claim Majorana fermion consists of a pair of electron's creation (= c^{†} ) and annihilation (= c ). This means the total is **zero** (= create + annihilate ) ?

This strange form is the reason why Majorana fermion **cannot** be called "real particle" instead of quasiparticle ( this p.4 ).

*(Fig.18) ↓ But this antiparticle is NOT a real one !*

Majorana fermion is said to be equal to its own *antiparticle*.

Then does this Majorana quasiparticle have the same form as its antiparticle ?

To begin from conclusion, **neither** antiparticle nor particle in Majorana quasiparticle is real.

They just suppose putting the mark "†" exchanges particle and antiparticle in quasiparticle. This is just an **artificial** definition, **Not** meaning the real nature ( this p.3 ).

When Majorana condsists of electron's creation and annihilation operators, putting the mark "†" to it gives the same form as the original.

This is **NOT** a real antiparticle, but "**fake**" antiparticle.

*(Fig.19) ↓ Why can these nonphysical symbols be useful ? Nonsense.*

It is often said that this Majorana quasiparticle may be useful for quantum computation. But unreal quasiparticle cannot be isolated !

In fact, this logic ( Majorana = quantum computer ? ) is **nonsense**.

Atomic Majorana model is just a collection of **non**physical symbols.

Electron in quantum mechanics is just an abstract letter.

And they defined Pauli exclusion principle as anticommutation of them.

In quantum mechanics, "creation+ annihilation" (= c^{†}c) denotes each particle's number. This is just a definition with **No** physical meaning.

Strange to say, the total number of Majorana fermion must be always "**1**" and it can neither increase nor decrease ( this p.6 ).

The electron's number (= energy ) consists of two Majorana in different places (= a, b ). This means Majorana is immune to any error ? ( this p.3 ).

But all these logics are based on artificial definition of Majorana quasiparticle, which **doesn't** represent truth ( this p.5 ).

*(Fig.20) Physicists need imaginary target = quantum computer.*

All roads lead to quantum computer, which is often exploited as "**camouflage**" target in unreal quasiparticles.

First, quantum computer based on ridiculous "parallel worlds" is just a scam.

Many people, corporations and governments are **deceived** into *wasting* their money in fiction.

*(Fig.21) ↓ Spin model is broken at room temperature !*

Quantum mechanics claims that (anti)ferromagnetism is caused by electron spin. But this is a big **lie**.

The **magnetic** energy by electron spin is too **weak** to cause ferromagnet.

Spin-spin interaction is easily broken at low temperature ( ~ 0.3 K ).

But actual iron can keep ferromagnetic at as 1043 K ( this p.8 ).

In fact, electron's spin **disagrees** with many experimental results !

"Spin" is used only as a "mark" with **No** physical meaning.

So we must give up contradictory spin model to investigate further mechanism !

It's natural to think that ferromagnet is maintained stably by Coulomb interaction among electrons' **orbits** ( not spin ! )

*(Fig.22) Spin magnet is too weak to explain ferromagnet.*

You may think Spintronics and excitonics are **useful** (← ? ) for your career.

But almost **nobody** knows electron spin **lacks** reality !

Its spinning far **exceeds**
light speed ( see this p.2 ).

You may hear spin is tiny magnet with the magnitude of Bohr magneton.

But this is **not** true, and disagrees with experiment.

Spin-spin *magnetic* interaction is too weak to explain actual ferromagnet. See this p.6 this p.7. Spin can be replaced by more realistic model.

Then, what the heck does this spin model mean ?

It uses "Heisenberg" spin model ( this p.3 ).

But this *Heisenberg* spin model is too **old**, which was introduced in **1920s**, and it's too **abstract** to describe actual phenomena ( this p.2 ).

This spin model just puts nonphysical symbols side by side. So **useless**.

Parameter J is **arbitrarily** chosen. J > 0 = antiferromagnet, J < 0 = ferromagnet.

*(Fig.23) ↓ Electron mass becomes much smaller inside solids !?*

Quantum mechanics can only show each as electron as abstract symbol. Then how can they describe more **complicated** phenomena ?

Surprisingly, they introduced unrealistic concepts such as "effective mass" in materials to explain various phenomena.

This "effective mass" **lacks** reality like above quasiparticle, because that **mass** can be negative ! See various effective mass smaller than electron's mass ( this p.9 ).

The Science paper showing Majorana quasiparticle uses **unreal** effective mass of (= **0.015 m _{e}**, m

*(Fig.24) ↓ Quantum mechanics cannot describe real phenomena.*

Actual materials contain almost infinite atoms and electrons.

So it's **impossible** to express those materials only by *abstract* symbols.

This is the reason why quantum mechanics **discards** real physical concepts. Instead, it relies on "fake" concepts such as "quasiparticle" and "effective mass".

In fact, **all** other g-factor and *spin-orbit* are **fake**. Effective mass, g-factor, spin-orbit constant are all "unreal" ( this p.3 and this p.8 ).

*(Fig.25) Because its magnitude disagrees with experiments !*

You may often see the word "spin-orbit" in various news.

But in fact, this "spin-orbit" does **NOT** mean real spin-orbit.

So they are "**fake**" spin-orbit interaction.

*(Fig.26) Einstein relativity changes electric field into magnetic ?*

Quantum mechanics claims that spin-orbit interaction represents Einstein **relativistic** effect. Suppose an electron spin is moving through electric field.

In this moving electron's frame, the *electric* field transforms into *magnetic* field, which causes spin-orbit magnetic interaction ( this p.7 ).

In fact, this Einstein electromagnetism includes fatal paradoxes, so the concept of "spin-orbit" is just **wrong**.

We can get spin-orbit coupling constant in case of original relativistic effect. This spin-orbit interaction by Einstein relativity is too small to be useful.

*(Fig.27) Because it's by six orders magnitude stronger than relativity ! *

Surprisingly, quantum mechanics **replaced** the original meaning of "spin-orbit" by the "**fake**" one which has nothing to do with Einstein relativity.

In semiconductor such as GaAs, this spin-orbit coupling is by **six** orders of magnitude **stronger** and has the **opposite** sign ( this p.2 left ) !

They introduced an artificial spin-orbit model and equation, which is completely *different* from Einstein relativity ( this p.7 and this p.7 ).

Other semiconductors such as InAs (= 117 ) has much **stronger** spin-orbit interaction than Einstein's prediction (= 10^{-6} ). See this p.131.

As a result, all quantum mechanical concepts such as spin, spin-orbit and mass are unreal and **fake**, have nothing to do with actual phenomena !

*(Fig.28) We must use experimental data to predict "real concept" !*

In the present quantum mechanics, even when we get some new experimental **data**, we **cannot** use them to clarify real mechanisms !

Instead, quantum mechanics forces us to use these data to create **artificial** quasiparticle, effective mass .. So our science stops its progress.

This is a very *serious* problem. We must address it immediately not to increase more educational victims under **false** science.

2016/3/18 updated. Feel free to link to this site.