*(Fig.1) Fantasy black hole is the only solution of general relativity.*

It is said that you **cannot** see black hole swallowing everyhing. including light

So there is **NO** direct proof of fictional black hole so far.

A characteristic of Einstein relativity is time dilation where each **clock** ticks differently, depending on velocity and gravity.

The gravity of black hole is so strong that its clock time stops on the surface of black hole ! Of course, this is unrealistic and causes fatal **paradox**.

*(Fig.2) Schwarzschild derived strange black hole solution.*

Schwarzshild first solved Einstein general relativity to get a solution of strange black hole.

This solution shows that from the viewpoint of observers (= earth ) outside black hole, clock time **slows** down, as a clock is closer to black hole.

And finally, the time **stops** on the surface of black hole called event horizon !

*(Fig.3) The relation between clock time and gravitational strength.*

According to Einstein general relativity, the clock runs more **slowly** as the *gravity* is stronger (= oberser is closer to the mass center ).

Clock time (= t_{0} ) **near** a massive star ( or black hole ) is **slower** than the time (= t_{f} ) far away from the star.

In Fig.3, M is the mass of a star, and "r" is the distance between the center of star and a clock. G, c is gravitational constant and light speed, respectively.

*(Fig.4) when distance (= r ) is 2GM/c ^{2}, clock time stops.*

According to black hole solution, when a clock approaches and reaches some point on the black hole, its time (= t_{0} ) stops relative to a clock time (= t_{f} ) far away.

*(Fig.5) Clock time stops on the surface of black hole ?*

The distance between the center of black hole and the point where time stops is r = 2GM/c^{2} called Schwarzschild radius or event horizon.

*(Fig.6) Hawking radiation never happens seen from Earth.*

If the time clock on the surface of black hole **stops**, Hawking radiation (= black hole evaporate ? ) is meaningless, and **never** happens, seen from observers at a distance.

So any observers on the earth (= far away from black hole ) can see **neither** radiation nor evaporation of black hole due to severe time dilation.

Despite this fact, physicists all over the world devote their lives to Hawking's useless paradox like a kind of "**cult**" !

*(Fig.7) Gravitational wave from colliding black hole is a lie !*

LIGO, for-profit colleges claim that gravitational waves discoverd were caused by collisions between two black holes. But this is a big **lie**.

Because the clock time stops around black holes, so two black hole **cannot** approach each other to collide !

*(Fig.8) Time stopping on black hole prevents its formation. *

The clock time stops on the surface of black hole from viewpoint of distant observer ( on **earth** ).

So it needs **infinite** time to form black hole from collapsed star.

It means black hole does **Not** exist now, different from this claim.

Black hole is one of the largest **scams** in science history ( this myth #2 ).

But if they give up black hole, physicists would have nothing to do in Einstein relativity. This is the reason *unreal* black hole survives.

*(Fig.9) Earth is approaching static black hole ?*

In fact, Einstein general relativity includes fatal paradox in clock time.

In Fig.9, the earth is approaching a static black hole.

This is OK, because the clock time **stops** only in black hole, seen from distant observers. So black hole looks "**frozen**".

*(Fig.10) Stopped time prevents black hole from approaching ?*

But from the viewpoint of an observer on the **earth**, how does black hole look like ? Of course, the time on the black hole remains **frozen**.

So, the black hole looks "stopping", seen from the earth.

This is a **paradox**, because we are approaching black hole or not ?

*(Fig.11) From K ( K' ) observer, Earth ( don't ) approach black hole !*

This is a fatal paradox of Einstein general relativity.

**K** observer *outside* the earth is watching the earth **approaching** static black hole.

In special relativity, each motion is relative depending on different observers.

Seen from the earth (= **K'** ), black hole remains frozen, **cannot** approach the earth.

So in **K** frame (= Fig.11 upper ), the distance between the earth and black hole gets shorter (= **approach** ) with time.

But in K' Earth frame (= Fig.11 below ), the distance between the earth and black hole does **NOT** change (= NOT approach ) due to "frozen" black hole !

This paradox is caused by the contradiction between general (= gravitational time dilation ) and special (= relative motion ) relativities !

*(Fig.12) But galaxy center is too concentrated to observe !*

It is said that the black holes exist at the center of galaxy. Of course, we cannot see black hole itself from which NO light can escape.

Astronomers argue they can estimate the existence of black hole by observing **star**'s motion *around* black hole.

The problem is galactic center is filled with so much **dusts** that we can**not** see even stars around black hole !

*(Fig.13) ↓ Evidence of black hole is very doubtful.*

Galactic center is too concentrated and filled with too many **dusts** to see.

We **cannot** observe even ordinary visible light like other stars.

So physicists try to estimate stars' motion around black hole by observing infrared light of longer wavelength.

In our Milky way galaxy, they pick up "S2 star" to esmimate masses of black hole and stars around it using ordinary gravitational Kepler law.

But as shown in Fig.13, this estimation is too hard and **vague** to confirm unseen black hole.

*(Fig.14) ↓ Star's velocity is too irregular ! → Black hole is doubtful.*

They claim the S2 star closest to black hole can be used as a tool to estimate black hole's existence. They supposed this star obeys ordinary Kepler law.

The problem is this estimated orbit of S2 star moving around black hole (← ? ) is very **strange** and contradictory.

If the star obeys only gravity, its velocity has to be **faster**, as it is *clocer* to the center in elliptical orbit. But this star's velocity is too **irregular** ( Fig.14 ) !

This star S2 becomes faster, slower, faster, slower, as it gets closer to the center of black hole, which **contradicts** Kepler gravity law, so doubtful

Considering galactic center is too crowded with dusts, materials around the center are moving and **dragged** by collisions or other strong *Coulomb* forces ( NOT black hole gravity ).

So black hoke estimation using vague star around it **cannot** prove contradictory black hole.

*(Fig.15) GPS did NOT prove Einstein relativity. *

They often say without Einstein relativity, it would cause GPS navigational errors of 10 km per day, so Einstein relativity is indispensable for GPS.

But this is a big **lie**. Because clock times between satellite and receiver are **Not** the same from the beginning ! Receiver's clock is **not** so accurate.

So they correct the time difference between satellite and the earth using
4th satellite. It means Einstein reltivity is *unnecessary* and **useless** from the beginning.

According to general relativity, satellite clock ticks **faster** by only 38 microseconds per day (← too **small** ! ).

Other atmosphere and leap second caused by *irregular* earth rotation affect GPS time much more.

If relativistic time correction is so small, they tried to measure GPS time difference after much longer time ( ex. 1 year ~ ) had passed ?

In fact, there was only one old case ( in 1977 ) which measured accumulated time difference for only *6 days* ( this p.11 ), which includes many **uncertain** factors.

So it is very difficult and **unrealistic** to use GPS clocks to measure relativistic time difference ( this p.17 )

*(Fig.16) Moving clock runs slower → Twin paradox ! → GPS wrong !*

The fact is Einstein general relativity shows fatal twin paradox in GPS, so false.

They argue a satellite clock ticks faster ( only **38** μs per day ← **too small** to believe ! ), combining time dilation and general relativity. See this this. But this *far-fetched* interpretation is **wrong** !

According to special relativity, **moving** clock ticks more slowly.

In Fig.16, two satellites are *moving* around the earth at the **same** speed "v" in the **opposite** directions.

The *distances* between the earth and both these satellites are always the **same** "r".

From the viewpoint of "A" satellite (← rest frame ), "B" satellite is moving, so "**B**" clock runs **slower**.

But from the viewpoint of "B" satellite, "A" satellite is moving, so "**A**" clock runs **slower** !

This is "famous" twin paradox. GPS time correction includes fatal paradox, so **wrong** !

*(Fig.17) Rotating frame = gravitational + centrifugal potential. *

In special relativity, moving clock runs slower. But it's **impossible** to prove twin paradox using only special relativity, which does **NOT** allow "*U-turn*".

So we have to use **general** relativity to prove twin paradox, and "GPS correction is **wrong**".

In fact, general relacitiy is very *simple*, which adds only gravitational potential to special relativity.

From the viewpoint of "B" satellite (= Fig.17 right ), the **whole** space is rotating in the opposite direction, and "B" satellite is "**stationary**", which feels the same amount of gravity and **centrifugal** force.

So in rotating frame ( ex. "merry-go-round" ), we have to add another "**centrifugal** potential" to gravitational potential. Coriolis force **doesn't** do work, so NO potential ( see this p.7 )

The distance (= r ) between the earth and two satellites are always the **same**, so these two potentials are the **same** in A and B. All we consider is time dilation in moving clock by *special* relativity ( this p.6 ).

As you see, from the viewpoint of one satellite (= A or B ), another satellite (= B or A ) looks to be **moving**, so A ( or B ) clock runs **slower** then B ( or A ) ! This is clearly a **paradox**.

*(Fig.18) Total energy = kinetic + potential energy is conserved.*

In fact, Einstein relativity **cannot** explain ordinary "**circular** motion" of two things attracting each other.

When an electron (= e- ) is moving around a proton (= e+ ), their total energy (= sum of kinetic and Coulomb energy ) is **conserved**.

*(Fig.19) ↓ Two kinetic energies of an electron are NOT conserved !*

How does this circular motion of an electron look, seen from an observer moving at a speed v ? Proton (= e+ )'s and potential energies are the same.

But when the electron is in upper position (= Fig.19 left ), its velocity is **increased** to "**2v**", and in lower position (= Fig.19 right ), its velocity is almost **zero**.

It means total energy inside the same electron's orbit *changes* and is **NOT** conserved, depending on an observer's motion !

This is clearly a fatal **paradox** in Einstein relativity.

*(Fig.20) The only theory of everything is fantasy string theory !*

Reason why Einstein relativity is wrong is that the **only** unified theory of relativity and quantum mechanics is 10 dimensional string theory.

There is only this **unrealistic** string ( or M ) theory as consistent theory of everything, so almost all academic posts are monopolized by string theory.

But as Feynman criticized this string theory, the present basic physics is a total **failure**.
We must not ignore fatal flaws in the present physics.

2016/5/6 updated. Feel free to link to this site.