*(Fig.1) Virtual photon with Negative mass squared ( m ^{2} < 0 ) is unrealistic.*

What causes forces such as electric force in our daily lives ? In fact, the present
quantum field theory uses **unreal**
virtual particles as all fundamental forces.

The present physics forces us to describe any forces and interactions using abstract Feynman diagram.

Surprisingly, these virtual particles disobey Einstein mass relation, because virtual paricles can have **negative** mass squared ( m^{2} < 0 ) ! Nonsense.

See this p.10 and this p.2 below.
So the present physics with self-contracdiction **failed** in explaining what the "forces" actually are.

*(Fig.2) Relativity rejecting light medium started illusory virtual particle.*

It is said Michelson-Morley experiment denied luminiferous **aether**.

The point is this "aether" is **static** relative to **absolute** space.

Under the Einstein relativity, the scace contains **nothing**, so they had to create other concepts to transmit electromagnetic forces.

This is "virtual particles". Ironically, these virtual particles **contradict** Einstein relativity, which is the reason they are called "virtual", **NOT** real.

*(Fig.3) ↓ "Light medium" is more realistic than virtual photons !*

In fact, Michelson-Morley did **NOT** deny "light *medium*" moving with the earth. Space is naturally filled with some medium transmitting electric fields and gravity.

If you reject this natural medium like Einstein, you have to accept *unreal* virtual photons **violating** relativity !

Virtual particles can move faster-than-light and disobey Einstein relativistic relation ( this p.3 ) This is **nonsense**.

*(Fig.4) Electric force is generated by emitting virtual photons ?*

The present quantum theory argues that electric force is due to electric charges **emitting** *virtual* photons.

Surprisingly, this virtual photons has **negative** mass squared ( m^{2} < 0 ), which is **impossible** in our real world !

And it's self-contradiction to **violate** Einstein relation ( this p.4 )

*(Fig.5) Total energy and momentum must be conserved.*

In fact, when an electron emits a photon, this emitted photon always becomes "**virtual**", NOT real ! We explain this reason here.

Suppose that the initial electron has energy (= E ) and momentum (= p ). After it emits a photon, the resultant electron stops (= momentum p is zero and only rest mass energy ).

Total energy and momentum must be always conserved in any reactions due to law of action and reaction.

As a result, the energy and momentum of the emitted *photon* become "**E-mc ^{2}**" and "

*(Fig.6) ↓ Einstein relativistic relation.*

Acccording to Einstein relativity, all ( real ) particles have to obey his energy-momentum-mass relation.

E, p and m_{0} are each particle's energy, momentum and rest mass, respectively.

*(Fig.7) Photon with negative mass squared is virtual, NOT real.*

Inserting the energy and momentum of the emitted photon into Einstein's relation, you'll easily find this emitted photon has **abnormal** mass (= its mass squared is negative ! ).

In Fig.7, rest mass energy (= m_{0}c^{2} ) is smaller than total energy (= E ), so the final result is negative.

So when a photon emitted from an electron conserves total energy and momentum, its mass squared becomes **negative** and unreal ( this p.10 ).

It means a photon model in quantum field theory fails and we have to consider other realistic **wave** model involving the "whole atom".

*(Fig.8) ↓ This virtual photon's mass is abnormal*

Even when an electron and a proton **annihilate** to form a *photon*, this photon always becomes virtual, **NOT** real ( this p.4 ).

Because this produced photon can **stop**, and its photon's mass **cannot** be zero !

Positron's unrealistic reaction can be replaced by realistic electron's capture.

*(Fig.9) Virtual photon's mass cannot be zero like real photon !*

Photon (= light ) must be massless in order to always travel at light speed c **without** stopping.
But a photon generated from electron-position annihilation **violates** this rule !

Suppose an electron and a positron are *approaching* each other at the same speed (= same momentum |p| ), moving in the **opposite** direction.

Due to total momentum conservation, the resultant photon produced from this annihilation **stops**, because its total momentum is canceled out to be **zero**.

Of course, the photon (= light ) **cannot** stop, so this photon is **virtual**, NOT real. And this virtual photon's mass is positive unlike real photon.

*(Fig.10) Fraudulent CERN should stop misleading people all over the world !*

In fact, the Large Hadron Collider (= LHC ) is an **useless** trash *wasting* our tax money. They often argue new particles might have been produced (← ? ).

But all these particles are always too **unstable** to be useful and their confirmation is doubtful and meaningless for our daily lives.

As you see, all these transient and very rare particles produced (← ? ) at LHC have made NO contribution to our actual society.

Gigantic colliders are just a convenient tool for **fraudulent** universities and media to **defraud** people all over the world of their money. This is the truth.

*(Fig.11) ↓ Those virtual particles don't exist in "real" world.*

They claim that standard model is very successful theory and agrees with every experiment (← ? ). But this claim is a big **lie**.

Because its forces are **virtual**, which is not real particle.

Its strong force, quark = **fractional** change cannot be isolated.

The most important force in standard model is "weak force" mediating beta decay.

But unfortunately, this weak (= W ) boson also **lacks** reality.

Because this W particle disobeys energy (= mass ) conservation.

*(Fig.12) This heavy W boson violates mass conservation.*

They claim weak boson was found **inside** colliders, but it has **nothing** to do with actual beta decay which W boson mediates is 80 times heavier than a proton !

This is very **strange**. Because they claim an initial *neutron* **decays** into a proton (+) and very **heavy** W boson (-).

The mass difference between a *neutron* and a proton is very **small**, which can **never** reach "80 times proton" mass !

So they start to claim this very heavy W boson is virtual (= **not** real ), which can appear for only a very short time.

This "far-fetched" interpretation is **too** good to be true.

Even in Higgs decay, this W boson is **virtual**, lacking realtiy.

So it's impossible to say the standard model "**giving up** reality" is the most successful theory. ( ← Big lie ! )

*(Fig.13) Gluon emitted from quark has negative mass squared, too.*

Standard model claims that hypothetical gluon mediates strong force between quarks inside nuclei. This gluon is also unreal **virtual** particles.

Because quarks emitting gluon is *similar* to the case where electrons emitting virtual photon.

*(Fig.14) All reactions inside wasteful collider use unreal particles.*

The reason why gigantic particle colliders are **meaningless** and just wasting our tax money is all thier reactions need **unreal** *virtual* particles.

Even in Higgs production (= cannot be directly confirmed, so doubtful ), they claim virtual particles **violating** Einstein relativity are indispensable.

So Large Hadron Collider (= LHC ) is just a wastegul **trash** misleading people and new students all over the world ! ← Very harmful collider.

*(Fig.15) QED virtual photon has negative mass squared.*

Also in Feynman QED, a photon emitted from an electron is virtual, not real, because the mass squared of this virtual photon can be **negative** ( this p.2 below ).

Though you may often hear quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) is one of most successful theories, it is a big **lie**.

The problem is the calculation results of QED always diverge to infinity ! So they started to artificially remove a **part** of infinity by renormalization.

Infinity can be divided into other infinity and any **arbitrary** finite value.

If we artificially remove this excessive infinity, we can get **any** finite value as we like.

This **artificial** trick is everything. QED is **NOT** a successful theory at all.

Even founder, Feynman said "QED is hocus-pocus, and mathematically **not** consistent".

*(Fig.16) ↓ Relativistic quantum field theory uses contradictory virtual particles !*

Einstein rejected the concept of "light medium" in space, so physicists needed other concepts to transmit electromagnetic ( Coulomb ) forces.

Though they created "virtual photons" as particles **mediating** electric force, this photon has **negative** mass squared and **disobeys** Einstein relativity !

As you see, the present quantum field thoery is filled with self-contradiction and nonsense.

But almost all textbooks and fraudulent universities **hide** the existence of this virtual particle, so people and students are **deceived** into believing the present physics is real.

*(Fig.17) Electron moves relative to "medium" → de Broglie wave !*

Lorentz *magnetic* force is perpendicular to particle ( or observer ) velocity. It causes serious paradox in different directin.

Electron's de Broglie wave **disobeys** Lorentz contraction (= independent of observer's motion ).
How can we fix this serious situation ?

The **only** way to fix it is we admit some real "medium", which relativity rejected. Medium moving **with** the earth *agrees* with Michelson-Morley experiment.

If we admit when an electron moves with respect to this medium, it causes de Broglie wave, we can solve all serious paradoxes above.

Furthermore, this real medium can explain electron's double-slit without fantasy parallel worlds.

In fact, light speed c is affected by various different **mediums** ( ex. water ).

Uniform and isotropic cosmic microwave background just fits this medium.

And we don't need **artificial** dark matter, if we admit some medium in space from the beginning.

*(Fig.18) "Medium" filling space naturally explains electric force.*

Even if you are a fan of Einstein and reject "light medium", you have to accept **unreal** virtual photons disobeying Einstein relativity as electric force.

After all, electromagtic forces can be naturally explained by some "medium" filling all space.

2016/5/27 updated. Feel free to link to this site.