Solid-physics, Quantum-field-theory, Ferromagnet

**2. Quantum computer is "scam" !**

Quantum-computer.

**3. Schrodinger equation is wrong**

Schrodinger-helium, Density-functional-theory

**4. Electron spin is unreal**

Spin, Pauli-principle, Singlet-triplet

**5. Photon doesn't exist**

Photon, Virtual-particle, ARPES

**6. Einstein, Hawking are "fiction"**

Gravitational-wave, Black-hole, BigBang, Hawking

**7. Special relativity paradox**

Paradox, Michelson-Morley

**8. Large hadron collider is useless trash**

Higgs, Anti-particle

**9. University tuition is skyrocketing**

Tuiiton-fee, UK-science

*(Lg-1) For-profit universities and the media distort the fact !*

Though the media repeats the same phrase, "gravitational wave is Einstein prediction !", this is a big **lie** and deceiving people.

Einstein general relativity has *flaws* which cannot transmit conserved-energy as wave, so physicists fabricated ad-hoc pseudo-tensor as gravitational wave.

So there are many choices in this ad-hoc pseudo-tensor ( this p.2 ), and the gravitational waves vanish depending on observers, which means **unreal**.

Einstein said gravitational waves don't exist. Too weak, artificially-chosen gravitational wave has **NO** scientific value, due to its **lack** of link to Einstein theory.

Breakthrough prize and this is a **waste** of ( tax ) money.
This billionaire = servant of Hawking *religion*, seems to like wasting money in fantasy extradimensions.

Physics professors live in imaginary parallel universes ?

If staffs of fraudulent breakthrough prize see my website, read Einstein is false.

*(Df-1) Supersonic oscillation of Rb atoms = fake black hole !?*

This claims Hawking black hole was "created" in a Lab, so he could win **Nobel** prize. But this black hole is **NOT** a true one, just fake ( this p.3 ).

After generating supersonic flow in Rb atoms' condensate by light. Sound wave cannot go against this supersonic current to escape, which they called "black hole analogue".

So this black hole at lab has **nothing** to do with true black hole.

All physicists **waste** their time in meaningless Hawking information religion !

Japan satellite wasting tax in unreal black hole was **punished** by God. The clear reason for that breakup remains *mystery*, not confirmed.

Black hole collision for gravitational wave (= disobey Einstein and too faint ) is **unreal** due to "time stopping". LHC is useless trash.

This physicist desperately tries to **hide** the fact black hole radiation is impossible due to "time stopping" seen from distant observer (= earth ).

If whether black hole formed or not by time dilation depends on different observers, it's **paradox**. Galaxy center is filled with too much **dusts** to confim black hole.

Quantum mechanics is completely useless.

*(Sc-1) Universities and the media defraud people of money !*

Recently, the media reported that Canadian prime minister gave quick lesson on quantum computer. But he didn't mention the heart, superposition (= parallel worlds ).

Political leaders should notice that they are just **deceived** by fraudulent universities, science advisers. Quantum computer is just a scam under useless science.

Politicians should judge whether each science is unrealistic or not by themselves ! Quantum computer is used as a tool to justify universities to raise tuition.

He should know Perimeter insititute is one of famous fraudulent organizations **misleading** young students by phoney science.

Harvard **wastes** their tuition in fantasy 12 dimensional F-theory.

The present astronomy is filled with fictions and
meaningless paradox.

Misleading article.
Toaster has nothing to do with quantum photon.

Mentor (= moderator ) closed threads, **hiding** contradiction between Lorentz contraction and de Broglie wave.

All this mess is caused by **useless** Schrodinger equation in quantum mechanics !

Top journal Nature tries to spread new **fiction**, "quantum internet" to **mislead** researchers all over the world, like *fraudulent* quantum computer.

Big Bang is nonsense, because its expanding energy is
not diluted (= negative pressure ? ) And our earth **cannot** feel those fictional dark matter and energy at all !

The earth is orbiting around the Sun **keeping** its angular momentum by Kepler law, meaning the earth feels **NO** external pressure from dark matter, energy !

This is **strange**, because both dark matter and energy can **push** all stars strongly. Earth's movement in tangential direction must feel their *friction* !

I ask Ethan, why physicists **waste** their time in **unreal** wormhole with negative mass and faster-than-light travel ?

This billionaire becomes a *missionary* for "Hawking information **religion**" ?

Misterious breakdown of Japan satellite tells us black hole is nonsense.

To predict atomic behavier, we need to know what causes Pauli exclusion principle.

*(Li-1) Fictional black hole and gravity wave are "scam".*

Japan satellite **wasting** our tax in **unreal** black hole was broken.

It's about time for us including NASA to stop seeking fictional black hole.

Now LIGO is desperately advertising unreal gravitational wave to get **Nobel** prize. They ( + poster girl ) **hide** the fact that it *contradicts* Einstein theory !

MIT Nobel Laureate Frank teaches fantasy
multi universes ?

**Nature** is spreading unreal black hole and Majorana quasiparticle.

Cern's false advertisement for phony science. Hawking again ?

Harvard ( its paper ) made **no** progress from phonon pseudoparticle.

Quantum mechanics is harmful, because it **forbids** curious people from asking what the light really is. Mentor (= moderator ) closed those threads.

See the light is just electromagnetic wave, and a photon is fiction !

*(Np-1) Big Bang = imaginary target for useless science.*

The present nuclear physics is **useless** and uses imaginary Big Bang as a fictional target, like pie-in-the-sky quantum computer.

Japan's satellite **wasting** our tax in *unreal* black hole was broken, **punished** by God ? All countries including NASA should stop pursuing fictional astronomy.

The **only** purpose of LIGO is to get **Nobel** prize by illusory
gravitational wave and keep exorbitant tuition. Particle physics depends on useless QFT.

Alan Guth should stop spreading fantasy inflationary universe.

I ask Ethan, black hole is the source of various delusions ?

Useless quantum mechanics **cannot** answer "what is actually happenining" even in simple angular momentum !

*(Hi-1) Higgs "boson", dark metter in LHC lack reality.*

Though several years have passed since **Higgs** got Nobel prize, this elusive particle has made No contribution to our daily lives.

Because all particle colliders such as Large Hadron collider (= LHC ) pursue only "**virtual**" particle, which is **useless** for us *forever*.

New hint of new particle (← ? ) has No meaning to us, gigantic colliders just waste our tax for nothing ! **Stop** meaningless particle physics right now.

Whether new doughtful particle is found (← ? ) or not is **nothing**, except for the media and bloggers.

Caltech should stop wasting their exorbitant tuition in **fictional** computer and paradox. Stop advertising false science.

Entanglement is just **fiction** spread by fraudulent social media.

Imaginary Big Bang has **nothing** to do with global warming !

*(Co-1) The present physics pursues only unreality. *

In fact, condensed matter by quantum mechanics is unrealistic.

Top journlas, Nature deals with **unreal** particles, Majorana and phonon.

Science
also pursues fictional Weyl particle.

These are all fictitious quasiparticle, **Not** true particles !

So applying these unreal quasiparticles to imaginary target = quantum computer is **nonsense** and just a scam.

Einstein birthday every year, forever, though it's false ?

The media mislead us into **wasting** our tax in *useless* collider.

It's ridiculous to seek fictional black hole using the same fiction.

I'm sick of misleading advertisement of gravitational wave.

They only talk about "unrelated" episodes, **Not** mentioning truth at all.

Mentor (= moderator ) closed the thread of
virtual photon to **hide** it.

All these things are **unacceptable**.

*(Qc-1) ↓ The present science stalls in fantasy. *

In fact, quantum computer is a scam.

The recent Science paper by MIT has **nothing** to do with fictional quantum computer. Their bloggers **hide** inconvenient facts. See its critic.

They **recycle** a qubit semi*classically*, **not** using "parallel worlds". See the original paper p.2. So this Science paper just did "classical mechanics".

This Harvard physics relies on nonphysical symbols as electron and useless density functional theory ( LDA functional ). See this paper p.11. So our science stops.

Nature likes a fictional particle, photon. But the photodetector at LHC just seesThough some people desperately try to defend Einstein, his theory is false.

*(Qf-1) Gravitational wave is a "scam". *

I'm sick of **all** the media spreading **false** facts about gravitational wave !

Gravitational wave is a pseudo-tensor, **NOT** Einstein true tensor.

Gravitational wave contradicts Einstein general relativity !

So Einstein **Never** admitted contradictory gravitational wave.

Then what is this doubtful gravitational wave useful for ?

They argue it's to see "dark side" such as black hole and early universe.

But we **cannot** go back as far as the early universe, just speculation.

So this logic (= to see universe ) is meaningless, "pie in the sky".

Brian Greene again **deceives** ordinary people (= Colbert ? )

He mistook "1/1000 of **proton**" for "atomic radius" intentionally.

**Electrons** inside LIGO detection *mirror* are moving around much **larger** area, so this detection is impossible. Black hole is fiction.

BBC should stop urging us to waste our tax and tuition in fictional science, because quantum field theory is false.

*(Ei-1) GPS → black hole = time stops ! = No waves.*

You may hear GPS proves Einstein relativity.

But if GPS uses Einstein relativity, LIGO's gravitational wave is a big lie.

They argue GPS uses gravitational time dilation, which affects GPS atomic clock ? Then how about very **strong** gravity around black hole ?

This says from the viewpoint of an observer ( on earth ) *outside* the black hole, time **stops** ! A falling object would appear **frozen** in time at the edge of the hole.

If the clock time **stops** at the black hole, **neither** merging nor collision between two black hole is possible.

So LIGO claim that the gravitational wave originates from *collision* between two black hole, is a big **lie**, because **frozen** time **forbids** it.

Wave-particle duality is **nonsense**. Because Einstein
hated quantum mechanics, there is **NO** "quantum wave function" in general relativity.

First, gravitational wave contradicts Einstein. His cult created even Einstein Girl ? Harvard wastes time in meaningless paradox, though Einstein is wrong.

*(Sp-1) Gravitational wave and spin lack reality.*

Gravitational wave discovery is ridiculous. **Electrons** inside LIGO *mirror* reflecting detection light are moving much *larger* area than 1/1000 of the proton.

Collision between black holes takes infinite time, so **impossible** ( this comment 7 ).

I doubt this saying Einstein reinstated afer **reneged** it, because basic contradiction between general relativity and gravitational wave remains the **same** and fatal.

So fraudulent academic organizations ( this, this ) should stop misleading people, though Einstein rejected gravitational wave. Forget Hawking.

Corrected title is "Einstein **rejected** gravitational wave, so he was **right**."

Nature **didn't** confirm unreal electron spin which is used only as a *mark* of some energy levels.
See Spin is just a mark, not real.

*(LIG-1) Gravitational wave is too small to believe.*

See Gravitational wave detected at LIGO is fake.

*(Un-1) Exorbitant tuition originates in phony science !*

See why university's tuition becomes unrealistically higher ?

*(Re-1) Students are deceived by phony science !*

Hawking black hole and its radiation is **fiction**.

His fanciful theory is what the Nature and the media
fabricated to attract people.

BBC intentionally **avoided** mentioning black hole formation needs **infinite** time, so it's impossible.

The problem is the present students are deceived into paying exorbitant tuition under these imaginary science by universities and the media !

I'm afraid suppression of free speech is rampant even in internet forum under the present **wrong** physics, where mentors (= moderator ) closed it without answering in detail.

See Michelson-Morley experiment didn't deny aether.

*(UK-1) The media determines the topic of physics ?*

See United Kingdom controls the world's physics.

*(Ha-1) When does the media stop misleading people using* *?*

See Hawking black hole is nonsense.

*(Hi-1) Change the arm by only 1/1000 of a proton ?*

See Gravitational wave doesn't exist.

*(Hi-1) What does Higgs boson getting Nobel prize mean ?*

Though the media says that Higgs **boson** discovered at large hadron collider (= LHC ) gives
other particle their *mass*, it is **untrue**, just media-hype.

In fact, Higgs boson detected (← ? ) at LHC has **nothing** to do with giving mass.

If Higgs boson really gives "mass" to every particle in our body,
we could have easily found Higgs bosons filling all space around us, **not** only inside the collider.

Then, Higgs boson which got Nobel prize is **not** worth the large money you paid for as *tax* ?

In fact, Higgs boson has made **NO** contribution to our sociery.

Only the media ( bloggers ) and *universities* make a great fuss about it to get some subsidies.

*(Hi-2) Higgs boson found ( ? ) at LHC doesn't give mass.*

The point is elusive Higgs boson detected at LHC has **nothing** to do with "*mass*" different from the media-**hype**.

As I said, if Higgs is giving mass to everything around us, we could have *easily* found such a Higgs floating around us. But we **couldn't**.

This argues "Higgs **field**" ( Not Higgs boson ) is the stuff that gives all other particles a mass.

Higgs boson is a quantized manifestation of a field ( the Higgs field ) ?

This distinguishing Higgs boson from field is **too good** to be true.

So unless we can find Higgs field ( **not** boson ), the large particle collider is **meaningless**, just a waste of our money.

The problem is ordinary people are **misled** into believing Higgs boson at LHC is involved in giving mass !

The same thing can be said about this doubtful particle ( ? ), which will **never** be useful for our society for the large money. We must think about it more seriously.

*(Hi-3) ↓ Larger particle collider is just waste of our tax*

We have spent a large amout of money ( tax ) in constructing **useless** particle colliders.

Neither Higgs nor quark have done anything useful to us.

Basically all unstable particles detected (← ? ) inside the collider will be **useless**, forever.

In spite of this fact, particle physicists try to construct wasteful new collider using out tax, one after another.

These constructions and desire are substantially **endless** and meaningless.

In fact. even detectors at the present LHC are completely useless.

The only people who benefit from these meaningless gigantic collider is the media and universities which try to collect money (= raise tuition ) under useless science.

*(LH-1) Detecting excess energy of two photons = Higgs ?*

Several years have passed since **Higgs** boson was found (← ? ) at large hadron collider (= LHC ).

But this Higgs is **un**substantial, lacking clear figure. And they **cannot** detect Higgs directly.
Then why can we claim Higgs is a *real* particle ?

They say the Higgs is so rare that only one in every **trillion** collisions inside LHC produces it. So almost all detected events are *unrelated* noises.

LHC can detect **only** photons (= light ) instead of Higgs ( this p.2 ).

And they just interpret "slightly excessive photon detection around 126 GeV energy" as Higgs.

Unfortunately, this is very **far-fetched** interpretation.

For example, electrons composing all atoms can be confirmed as *real* particles.

But this elusive Higgs has made **No** contribution to our society.

It exists **only** inside Cern "virtual space" of computer and the media.

*(LH-2) Electron's energy cannot be changed into real photon. *

We often see the boring cliche that standard model is the most successful theory (← ? ) ever in various sites. But is it really true ?

As shown in Higgs, all the LHC can measure is the **energy** of the *final* particles into which initial particles transform, they claim.

But in fact, it's **impossible** *both* total energy and momentum are conserved when a particle changes into another particle of **different** mass.

For example, when an electron's energy is transferred to a lighter photon, the ratios of transferred energy to momentum **don't** agree.

So when each electron emits some photon with the same amount of energy, this photon must be always virtual photons, which is not real.

*(LH-3) Calorimeter at LHC uses unreal virtual photons.*

So all processes involved in Higgs must rely on *unreal* virtual particles.

This is one of reasons why Higgs **lacks** physical reality even now.

To measure the total energy, LHC rely on electromagnetic cascade in calorimeters where the initial energy changes into multiple particles.

In these cascades, unreal virtual particles appear. They claim a pair of positron and electron is produced only from this virtual photons ( this abstract, this )

Of course, we cannot detect antimatter and virtual particles directly. All they can detect is light (= photon ) and electrons' current.

The problem is even the *energies* **cannot** be measured correctly at LHC !

*(LH-4) Short and long wavelength lights are missing !*

The important point is calorimeters at Cern are **useless**.

Because it's impossible to detect **all** *energies* involved.

Energies related to **nuclear** breakup and neutrino are all **missing** ( this p.9 )

Photodetector can detect **only** lights of specific wavelength (= *visible* light ).

So high energy X rays and low energy lights **escape** photodector ( this p.4 )

Even detectable visible lights are missing ( detection efficiency < 40 %, this p.34 ).

So they have to artificially change some ( UV ) lights into detectable green light expecting *dissipation* of its energy ( this p.5 ).

Even in ejected electrons' current, all LHC can measure is the **total** charge ( above some threshold ). Each kinetic energy is **unknown** !

Extradimention and dark matter relying on "missing energy" is **doubtful**. To agree with experiment, *artificial* simulation is indispensable.

I'm afraid this wasteful gigantic collider is used as a tool to justify *exorbitant* tuition of universities preying on weak students, despite fatal flaws.

*(Em-1) ↓ Emit energy ? *

You may often see the boring cliche "accelerating electron radiates energy in classical orbit" in textbooks.

But in fact, these explanations are **false** and physically impossible.

They consider an electron as a spherical conductor storing repulsive charges.

This "stored energy" electron model is inconsistent with the *smallest* stable-charge electron. So textbooks are completely **wrong**.

Even Schrodinger equation has to rely on "stable wavefunction", where de Broglie wave's phases agree with each other at ends.

The truth is it's physically **impossible** that only a single electron emits or absorbs a photon quantum mechanically.

*(Em-2) ↓ A electron radiates a photon (= energy ) ? *

It's known that light (= photon ? ) has an energy proportional to its frequency as E = hf, and its momentum p = E/c.

An electron has its momentum p = mv and its kinetic energy E = 1/2mv^{2}.

Suppose this electron **emits** a photon and loses its kinetic energy.

Of course, total energy and momentum must be conserved.

But it's impossible to satisfy both energy and momentum conservation !

In general, when a particle emits ( or absorbs ) another particle of **different** mass, one of energy or momentum is **Not** conserved.

Because in a photon with **No** mass, its momentum is much **smaller** compared to its great energy.

So only Compton scattering **without** emitting or absorbing is allowed.

*(Em-3) ↓ Virtual photon has negative mass m ^{2} < 0.*

As I said, emitted ( or absorbed ) photon **cannot** conserve both energy and momentum at the same time.

Then what the heck is a photon which quantum mechanics says about ?

In fact, these photons are called "virtual", which disobey Einstein relation.

Surprisingly, these virtual photons have **negative** mass ( m^{2} < 0 ).

All forces such as Coulomb, weak, strong forces are virtual, **Not** real.

This is the reason why experimental results in LHC **lack** reality, just *wasting* our tax.

The problem is **all** the media, universities and bloggers are **hiding** these virtual particles from people ! So probably you **don't** know it.

They are one of main factors destroying your precious careers.

Academic **frauds** are rampant openly now !

*(Em-4) ↓ The momentum of the whole orbit is "zero". *

To conserve **both** energy and momentum and **avoid** unreal virtual photons, what are they doing ?

As I said, a photon with *smaller* mass tends to have **larger** energy compared to its momentum ( E >> p ).

So each electron has to emit ( or absorb ) **only** photon's *energy* **without** photon's momentum. Is it possible ?

The total momentum included in the **whole** ( circular ) orbit is **zero** ( p = 0 ).

Because an electron is moving around the nucleus, up and down, to the right and left.

So if *spreading* electromagnetic wave ( **not** a photon ) affects the **whole** electron's orbit, **only** its energy is transferred, keeping the total momentum **zero**.

When an electron is ejected by electromagnetic wave, its heavy nucleus ( with little energy, large momentum ) moves in the opposite direction, balancing the total momentum.

So we have to consider light as real wave spreading in some medium to abandon virtual photon.

*(Ph-1) ↓ A single photon is bigger than 1000 meter !? *

You may often see "photon", a quantum particle of electromagnetic wave ? in various academic sites and news.

OK. Then how *big* is a single photon ?

In fact, the present physics **cannot** answer even this basic question !

For example, radio wave is one of electromagnetic waves, which have very **long** 1000 meter wavelength. A single photon is so *big* ?

We have **never** confimed so big photon. So a photon is just a **fictional** particle.

Even Nobel laureate, Lamb (= photon experimentalist ) did **Not** believe a photon.

*(Ph-2) Electron is ejected above some light frequency. *

Quantum mechanics claims Einstein's photoelectric effect proved a photon.

But I bet you **won't** be able to find any clear photon images in them.

The point is in photoelectric effect, all you can detect is **electrons**' current ejected by *light* (= photon ? ). **Not** any photons can be seen directly.

When you shine *light* above the threshold **frequency** (= f ) on to a metal, electrons are emitted from the metal, which is detected. That's all.

As you see, there is **No** proof of a photon *particle* here.

Light frequency is equal to c / **wave**length, which means "wave" !

So this famous photoelectric effect just showed incident light is "**wave**", Not a particle.

Besides it, a photon interacting with a electron must be "virtual", **not** real, when the total energy and momentum are *conserved*. So a photon is fiction.

*(Ph-3) Increased ejected photoelectrons = a photon ? *

Then what is a "photon" in university and the media based on ?

They claim a single photon detector can detect each photon particle.

Again, this explanation is **misleading**.
Because a single photodetector detects **Not** a photon, but *electrons*' current excited by incident *light*. ( this Fig.1 ).

Only when frequency and intensity of an incident light exceed some *threshold* (= which can be adjusted ), they call its electric signal "photon".

So there is **No** experimental proof of a photon.

Fictional photon is needed for **useless** quantum field theory.

This bogus science has **No** benefits for you, except imposing exorbitant tuition.
So students including dropouts should **sue** *universities* for deceiving them !

*(Ph-4) Photodetector cannot eliminate false ( dark ) count. *

Then, how does this single photon detector count, what they call, a *photon* ? Photon detection efficiency is given by ( photon count - dark count )/ N.

**Dark** count is "false count", which electric signal is excited by **unrelated** thermal noise or something, even **without** a photon.

In fact, the threshold light power causing detectable electric signal can be artificially *adjusted*. So a photon is just an **artificial** particle by the detector.

In this p.7, if you raise "bias voltage" of detector, both dark (= false ) and photon counts increase. So picking up only one **true** photon is **impossible**.

"N" is the **calibrated** incoming photon ( this p.4 ). How do they calibrate it ? They have to rely on *classical* light power (= intensity ), where electron's current is proportional to light intensity !

So after all, the present physics must rely on "classical light intensity" for **defining** a photon and calibrating the photodetector.

*(Bl-1) Time stopping on black hole prevents its formation. *

What does black hole look like ? Like this or this ?

Unfortunately these images are all **imaginary** fiction.

The reason of the name "**black** hole" is **no** light can get out, so black hole cannot be seen directly.

Furthermore, the clock time stops on the surface of black hole from viewpoint of distant observer ( on **earth** ).

So it needs **infinite** time to form black hole from collapsed star.

It means black hole does **Not** exist now, **different** from these claims.

Black hole is one of the largest **scams** in science history.

In fact, this bogus black hole just reflects basic flaws of the current physics which does **harm** to all students' careers !

*(Bl-2) ↓ Clock time ( t ) near black hole stops ! *

Einstein general relativity got the famous relation indicating stronger gravity **slows** clock time. M is the mass of black hole.

t_{earth} means the clock time measured at points (= earth ) far away from the black hole. t_{black} is the time near black hole.

As shonw in Bl-2, as the distance "r" is shorter, the clock time t_{black} is **slower** compared to the time on the *earth*.

At some distance (= Schwartzshild radius ), its clock time stops seen from the earth.

Of course, falling into black hole is possible within finite time.

But when we talk about black hole, it's always **far** away from the earth.

Though they claim GPS uses this time dilation, it's affected mainly by atomospheric medium, which may **change** light frequency in atomic clock, **Not** by time dilation.

*(Bl-3) Impossible to form black hole within age of universe. *

For a star with mass M to be a black hole, it needs to **contract** to some radius r. But as the star is **denser**, the time on its surface is **slower**.

To be black hole, it needs to be dense enough to **stop** the clock time !

It takes infinite time, so black hole **cannot** be formed ( this #2 ).

So if you accept this black hole, you must give up Big Bang theory which claims the universe is *13.8* billion years (= finite ) old.

The present physics claims the oldest black hole formed 900 million years **after** Big Bang. But it's **impossible**, as I said.

Of course, if many black holes existed from the beginning of Big bang, our earth would have been already *absorbed* into one of them.

And it contradicts nucleosynthesis of the present Big Bang theory.

So the black hole is just a **scam**, destroying new students instead of stars !

*(Bl-4) Dense dusts prevent confirming black hole. *

Black hole absorbig everything **cannot** be observed directly.

Instead, they claim observing star's motion around black hole could prove its existence.

The problem is these black hole candidates are all so **distant** from the earth that even star's motion around it **cannot** be seen !

The closest black hole is at the center of Milky way, which is 25000 light years away. Some stars are orbiting around the black hole ?

They say the orbital distance between one of the stars (= S2 ) and the black hole is only 17 light *hours*, almost impossible to see its precise motion !

The point is the center of galaxy is filled with an enormous amount of **dusts**, so visible lights from there are blocked. They just estimate from vague infrared light.

They considered some "light spot" among dusts as a "star" by fitting parameters to Kepler law. But their masses and parameters are all just "speculation".

Dark matter was introduced, because Kepler law **failed** !

High-energy *ionized* **dusts** are moving around the center, attracting each other, **Not** by black hole.

*(Fs-1) ↓ This was really a lucky coincidence ? *

Though textbooks *avoid* mentioning it, Bohr-Sommerfeld model first **agreed** with **all** hydrogen spectrum lines including small fine structure.

After quantum mechanics was born, Dirac equation combining quantum spin and Einstein relativity got the **same** fine structure solution. ←Accident ?

This lucky *coincidence* between Bohr-Sommerfeld and Dirac hydrogen was called "historical magic". See the last, too.

Usually, this coincidence was **impossibe** without any *artificial* manipulation. In fact, this relativistic Dirac hydrogen includes fatal **flaws**.

It uses **relativistic** effect of spin-orbit coupling.

But Einstein relativity **contradicts** two-slit by de Broglie wave.

We can naturally think fine structure is due to increasing resistance as an electron is closer to light speed c.

*(Fs-2) Linear Dirac equation contains spin ?*

Relativistic Dirac equation was gotten by dividing Einstein quadratic relation into **linear** functions.

In compensation for linear function, Dirac equation must contain 4 × 4 gamma (= γ ) matrices, which consist of spin Pauli matrices (= σ ).

This is the reason they claim Dirac equation succeeded in combining "spin" and relativity. But "σ = spin ?" is just *artificial* definition with **No** grounds !

To begin with, these Pauli σ matrices are just the result of changing quadratic → linear functions. They have **nothing** to do with *unreal* spin

The problem is the momentum (= p ) in this Dirac equation is **always** tied to spin (= σ ) operator, which causes serious **flaws**.

*(Fs-3) ↓ "angular" kinetic energy is missing in Dirac.*

In Schrodinger's hydrogen, **kinetic** energy term **splits** into "radial" and "**angular** (= tangential )" motions' terms.

The problem is relativistic Dirac hydrogen is always **accompanied** by *spin* σ operator. See this p.26, and this p.6.

So when separating kinetic energy term, there are only "radial (= p_{r} )" energy and "spin-orbit interaction (= σL )" left.

It means "**angular**" kinetic energy does **Not** exist in Dirac hydrogen !

This is clearly paradox.

Because it's impossible that *angular* (= tangential ) momentum **doesn't** exist though it includes spin-**orbit** energy !

This contradiction is caused by artificial trick to get the same fine structure solution as Bohr-Sommerfeld model.

*(Fs-4) Hydrogen ground state ( n = 1 ) has unreal 1p1/2 !*

There are more serious **flaws** in Dirac hydrogen.

Linear Dirac equation has 4 × 1 "**matrix**-form" solution ψ.

In Dirac hydrogen, even when orbital angular momentums (= l ) are **different**, total energies E are the **same** under the **common** total angular j = l ± 1/2 and principal quantum number n.

For example, 2s1/2 and 2p1/2 have the **same** energy in Dirac hydrogen, because their n = 2, j = 1/2 are the *common* values.

So they defined the upper spinor φ with angular l = j + 1/2 and the lower spinor χ with l = j - 1/2 under the same j and n.

This causes a **serious** problem.

What happens in the hydrogen **ground** state n = 1 ?

Hydrogen ground state n = 1 has only one orbital 1s1/2 with **No** orbital angular momentum ( l = 0 ). But Dirac hydrogen must **always** include *different* l = j ± 1/2 !

So this Dirac hydrogen must have **unreal** orbital 1p1/2, which is l = 1 angular momentum despite its n = 1 energy level !

As you see, for "**lucky**" coincidence between Bohr-Sommerfeld and Dirac hydrogens, one of them (= latter ) has to rely on **far-fetched** tricks.

*(Di-1) Universities hide unrealistic Dirac equation.*

Though the media likes to **mislead** people using showy images about particle physics, these images are all **fake**.

Ordinary people don't know the fact that *abstract* Dirac equation **governs** all particles such as electron,
quark and neutrino ..

This Dirac equation is so **abstract** (= out of touch with reality ) that the media and universities seem to desperately **hide** it.

Einstein relation of mc^{2} is applied to this relativistic Dirac equation, which is the basis of *unreal* QED, Higgs and forces.

In fact, they **hide** true paradox of Einstein relativity, which **destroys** all student's careers now ! Black hole cannot form.

*(Di-2) ↓ γ matrix = 4 × 4 matrix.*

It is said relativistic Dirac equation combined quantum spin and Einstein relativity. But this spin **lacks** reality and disagrees with facts.

How did Dirac equation incorporate "spin" ?

In fact, this spin is based on "**far-fetched**" idea.

The original Einstein energy-momentum (= p ) relation is quadratic function in energy E, which is too **inconvenient** to use.

So they **divided** the original Einstein relation into two **linear** functions of energy E. It is called Dirac equation. That's all.

In compensation for "linear" energy function, Dirac equation has to contain complicated 4 × 4 gamma (= γ ) matrices.

*(Di-3) ↓ Why relativistic spin lacks reality.*

These γ matrices consist of 2 × 2 Pauli matrices.

They claim these Pauli matrices represent unreal spin.

But as you see, there is **No** physical reality in this spin form.

This is the reason why the media and universities try to **hide** Dirac equation from people.

This **abstract** quantum field theory is the main reason why the current universities only give **useless** science for their *exorbitant* tuition.

The serious problem is ordinary people and students are **deceived** into believing the present science is useful by those academic swindlers.

*(Nc-1) ↓ Light splits into 1 and 2 at beam splitter.*

Today's nature claims even a large object can be in two states at the **same** time. In this "**superpositon**", a grotesque cat can be dead **and** alive at the same time ?

Unfortunately, this many-world like idea is just **illusion**.

Quantum computer using " parallel-world" is just a scam to extort money from people.

Even when the original light just **splits** into path 1 and 2 at the beam splitter, the present physics call it "*superposition* = **parallel** worlds 1 and 2".

This far-fetched idea is caused by defining a **fictional** light particle (= photon ). But this photon has **No** direct evidence. Even "how big" is **unknown**.

So the strange quantum physics **misinterprets** "just classically *split* light" as parallel worlds.

*(Nc-2) Real de Broglie wave in "medium".*

It's known even a **single** electron can **interfere** with itself in two-slit experiment.
Using **real** *medium* of de Broglie wave, we can easily explain it.

But Einstein relativity **denied** any medium !

So they use "many-path worlds" where a **single** electron passes **both** slits at the same time.

The problem is physicists jumped to the conclusion that atom interferometry using de Broglie wave interference showed "superposition = *parallel* worlds".

Though if we suppose some real **medium**, we can solve all fatal paradoxes such as two-slit and magnetic force.

This Stanford atomic interferometer just uses "a large number of atoms", so it has **nothing** to do with
"superposition of a **single** particle= big Schrodinger cats ?"

*(Nc-3) Interference needs some "external force" (= medium ).*

The important point is that a single particle **cannot** interfere with itself **without** any *external* forces.

Suppose a single electron **splits** into 1 and 2 which interfere with each other. Due to law of action and reaction, the **sum** of forces acting on two electrons is always **zero**.

But interference means the electron is kicked out from some destructive interference points by some **other** *external* forces.

If there is only a single electron, law of action and reaction **forbids** the electron from being expelled from some places.

So electron's de Broglie wave interference **needs** some **other** things (= medium ) than the electron itself to cause interference pattern.

Under this unreal science, universities must **stop** *exorbitant*
tuition for innocent students !

*(Mc-1) ↓ Light momentum disappears ?*

This (5) claims *Santa Claus* can turn milk and cookies into **energy** through Einstein's **mc ^{2}** ! But it's

They say in pair production, the incident light energy (= 2mc^{2} ) turns into a pair of an electron (= mc^{2} ) and a positron (= mc^{2} ) through this.

The problem is this process **disobeys** Coulomb energy and momentum conservation !

When resultant particles **stop** using up all light energy, its momentum is **zero**. It means the initial light *momentum* ( p = h/λ ) suddenly **disappears** !

This says near heavy nuclei absorb this initial light momentum.

But it's **impossible** for nuclei to absorb **only** momentum *without* energy.

The **only** practical use of antimatter, PET can be replaced by "electron capture".

*(Mc-2) Relativistic momentum (= p ), energy (= E ).*

How was this Einstein's famous mass relation made ?

Einstein's relativity relies purely on "relative" ( not absolute ) motion.

When an observer and an electron stop, the stationary electron has zero momentum ( p = 0 ) and only *rest* mass energy ( E = mc^{2} ).

When the observer starts to move at speed v, from his viewpoint, the electron is **moving** in the opposite direction at v (= Mc-2 right ).

So from his viewpoint (= frame ), electron's momentum and energy becomes this.

**All** these relativistic energy (= E ) and momentum (= p ) satisfy Einstein relation in **any** observer's speed v.

*(Mc-3) ↓ Electron's de Broglie wave vanishes !?*

The serious problem is this Einstein momentum **contradicts** de Broglie relation ! Relativistic version is this.

de Broglie wavelength was confirmed in two-slit and
various experiments. So if Einstein relation **disagrees** with *de Broglie* relation, his theory is wrong.

In Mc-3 left, an electron is moving at v, causing its de Broglie wave and double-slit interference.

But from the viewpoint of the **moving** observer, the electron appears to **stop** in Mc-3 right. So he sees **No** interference due to *vanished* de Broglie wave !

This is clearly one of true paradoxes. So if students ( including dropouts ) suffering from debt **sue** *universities* for destroying their careers, they could **win** !

*(Mc-4) ↓ Reason virtual photon, Higgs, quark are illusion.*

The important point is this Einstein relation forms the **basis**
of the current particle physics through relativistic Dirac equation.

This quantum field theory is the **origin** of *unreal* virtual photons, beta decay and Higgs through **non**physical "gauge" symmetry.

*Higgs* boson has made **No** contribution to our society, just **wasting** our *tax*. These imaginary particles exist **only** inside the media and bloggers !

**All** processes in LHC collider depend on *unreal* virtual particles, where they can freely change "artificial" mass. So meaningless as physics.

CERN and universities should stop **misleading** new students.

I bet permanent jobs in useless science will **never** increase.

Temporary jobs in this "fictional" fields just **worsen** the damage to educational **victims** !

*(Rs-1) ↓ H atom fine structure is relativistic effect ?*

Hydrogen atom has small energy splitting (= fine structure ).

They say this splitting shows the difference between electron's spin up and down.

This spin-orbit interaction is said to be *Einstein* relativistic effect.

But electron is so **tiny** point-like that its spinning **exceeds** light speed ( this p.2 ).

In fact, Einstein relativity includes true paradoxes, which fact universities and the media desperately **hide** !

Furthermore, fine structure didn't use *irrational* spin at first.

So the **relativistic** spin-orbit interaction is **not** what's actually happening.

*(Rs-2) ↓ Moving proton causes magnetic spin-orbit ? *

Why is this spin-orbit coupling called "relativistic" effect ?

In H atom, an electron is **moving** around a proton (= nucleus ).

From the electron's point of reference, the proton appears to be moving.

Einstein relativity is based on purely relative ( **not** absolute ) motion.

So even if the proton is actually stationary, the electron **feels** the *pseudo*-**magnetic** field created by **moving** proton.

Because the **magnetic** field is caused by electric current (= **moving** charge ).

This *pseudo*-**moving** proton produces magnetic field at the electron spin ?

They say electron spin has the magnetic moment equal to Bohr magneton. So interaction between magnetic field by proton and electron's spin causes fine structure splitting ?

This *relativistic* spin-orbit interaction ( this p.7, this p.8 ) is really right ?

*(Rs-3) Relativistic spin-orbit coupling → Paradox ! *

The point is this relativistic electromagnetic fields cause fatal paradox !

This is due to "velocity (= **observer** ) dependent" Lorentz magnetic force.

In Rs-3 right, the moment the observer starts to move, the *neutral* electric current turns to "**positive**", which attracts a minus charge.

Probably, you **don't** know this paradox in special relativity, because they **hide** it in almost all textbooks and websites.

Besides this, Einstein relativity **contradicts** two-slit, de Broglie wavelength, light refraction and Coulomb force !

And this spin-orbit model **doesn't** consider total energy conservation. When the proton is moving, we must add this **large** kinetic energy of proton !

In the usual frame of "stationary" proton, this relativistic spin-orbit energy **cannot** be added to total energy, because the proton is **not** moving.

We can naturally think the fine structure is caused by different reason.

*(Rs-4) Na+ ion must have 3.5 positive charge, if * *is right.*

They say Na large fine structure in D lines is also due to spin-orbit interaction. The problem is this Na fine structure splitting is too **big**.

Compare fine structure splitting in H (= 0.000045 eV ) and Na (= 0.0021 eV ) atoms.

It is known that this fine structure splitting is proportional to Z^{4}/n^{3}, where n is principal quantum number. See
this last and this p.4.

Z is effective positive charge (= H+, Na+ ion ), which movement causes **magnetic** field at the electron's spin ?

To get the large Na fine structure, this central charge (= Na nucleus + all **inner** electrons ) must be unrealistically big ( Z is +3.5 ).

In other alkali atoms, the situation becomes much **worse**.

So relativistic "spin-orbit" interaction is **too weak** to cause alkali fine structure.

Students ( including dropouts ) suffering from debt should **sue** universities for destroying all students' careers by *exorbitant* tuition and **wrong** theories.

*(Ne-1) Entanglement is a far-fetched interpretation. *

I'm sure the court can easily judge black hole is **scam**, destroys students, not stars. Quantum computer uses parallel-world computation.

This *parallel* world idea is just **fantasy**, so quantum computer is reduced to just a tool for universities to collect money from tax and people.

Unfortunately, this Nature paper has made **No** progress from 2001.

The problem is news **never** try to make people understand what it means !

This entanglement is just "classical", **different** from this claim.

They just make two spins the same by illuminating them with light in Ne-1.

In this state, the moment A (= up ) is known, B (= up ) is determined.

This is **not** "superluminal". They are just "up-up" states *before* **measurement**.

*(Ne-2) Be+ and Mg+ ions are trapped at short interval.*

In the original paper, they just call two energy levels "up" and "down" spins. Illuminating them with light changes these states **freely**.

Two Ba+ and Mg+ ions are so close that their states affect each other by electromagnetic force.

They **adjust** this device condition, illuminate them with some light and make their energy levels always the **same** ( up-up or down-down ).

Under some illuminating time, whether "up-up" or "down-down" in two ion states becomes **unknown** ( this Fig.2 ).

They just **mis**interpret this classically "*unknown*" state as "entangle = **parallel** worlds".

*(Ne-3) Entangle is just classically "unknown" state.*

In Ne-3, we **don't** know whether "up-up" **or** "down-down" in Be+ and Mg+ energy levels. This is just classically *unknown* and manipulated.

Surprisingly, the present physics intentionally misinterprets this "*unknown*" states as "**parallel** worlds = superposition".

"Superposition" means a grotesque cat can be "dead" **and** "alive" at the **same** time, where the moment we know Ba+ is "up", Mg+ is determined as "up".

Though they claim this determination process is *superluminal* (= spooky ? ), these ions are just "up-up" just **before** measurement, classically.

So "entanglement", "quantum computer" rely on **far-fetched** idea = *unreal* parallel worlds to claim they are non-classical (← ? ) phenomena.

There is **No** mystery here. They are just "*classical*" phenomena.

*(Ze-1) Inner electrons ( NOT spin ) cause Zeeman. *

It is said that complicated anomalous Zeeman effect under magnetic field proved the existence of "spin". But is it true ?

In fact this *anomalous* Zeeman pattern was seen **only** in **large** atoms.

Even if you try to find them, you can find only sodium case ( this p.3 ).

I bet you can **never** find similar anomalous Zeeman effect in *small* **hydrogen** and lithium atoms.

Electron spin lacks reality, its spinning far **exceeds** light speed.

Sodium (= Na ) has many inner electrons ( n=1, 2 ).

This means complicated anomalous Zeeman pattern is caused by **inner** electrons instead of unreal spin ?

*(Ze-2) One electron H shows "normal" ← Not spin. *

It is known that one-electron hydrogen shows normal Zeeman effect.

It means Zeeman effect is due to "**inner** electrons", **not** spin !

Lithium is also normal Zeeman triplet.
They found an *excuse* that usual magnetic field is too strong for them ( this p.14, this p.22 ).

This *excuse* is called "Paschen-Back" effect, which is substantially **equal** to normal Zeeman effect.

To be precise, in this book p.659, they say,
"for *weak* magnetic field, each component of H_{α} doublet was separated in **normal** Zeeman triplet."

This doublet fine structure **doesn't** need spin.

So in case of one-electron hydrogen, typical anomalous Zeeman pattern of Na is **Not** seen. It means anomalous Zeman is **not** by spin.

In fact, it is **impossible** that sodium doublet is due to spin-orbit interaction.

Fatal magnetic paradox **disproves** "relativistic" spin-orbit effect.

*(Ze-3) Magnetic field ↓ →hyperfine + free parameters. *

They say anomalous Zeeman pattern obeys Lande-g factor (= g_{J} ).

But in fact, even in typical sodium case, we **cannot** confirm this Lande-g-factor.

I could find **only** Rb case, which measured this g_{j} ( this Table II ).

But experimental results were **different** from Lande-g-factors ( experiment = 1.18 vs. Lande-g = 1.336 ).

So physicists **gave up** the *direct* measurement of this Lande-g-factor. Instead, they weaken magnetic field and try to add various **uncertatin** *parameters* such as "nuclear hyperfine" to it.

Nuclear hyperfine is affected by various **uncertain** effects such as "shield electrons", so it must include various **free** adjustable *parameters* ( this p.4 ).

In this scheme, they could estimate g_{J} as one of "fitting parameters".

So this Lande-g-factor based on various *uncertain* parameters is very **doubtful**.

It's regrettable that even associate professor is **misleading** people by linking unrelated hoverboard to useless general relativity.

*(Sp-1) Why "spin speed" cannot decrease ? *

Electron spin is often mentioned as a tool of quantum computer.

But a single electron is a very tiny point-like particle.

So its spinning speed must far **exceed** light speed c to reach angular momentum 1/2ħ See this (4), this p.2.

Spin is so **bizarre** that it cannot be explained by real thing.

Because spin angular momentum ( 1/2ħ ) can **neither** decrease **nor** increase !

What *force* or mechanism **keeps** this spin from decreasing ?

Unfortunately, quantum mechanics has **No** answer to this question !

*(Sp-2) Spin = Bohr magneton is too good to be true. *

Surprisingly, they argue this electron spin also has "Bohr magneton", which is the same magnetic moment as old Bohr model.

"Bohr magneton" was derived from Bohr's classical orbit.

Why does "spin", which has **nothing** to do with Bohr model, have the **same** Bohr magneton, too ?

This *coincidence* is very **strange**.

Bohr orbit has quantized **ħ** angular momentum, and spin has the half of it (= **1/2 ħ** ).

So they started to claim spin has g-factor "**2**", which is **twice** the Bohr orbit (= **1** ). "g-factor" is the ratio of magnetic moment to angular momentum.

As a result, both can have the **same** Bohr magneton ( 1 × ħ = 2 × 1/2 ħ ).

This "*far-fetched*" interpretation is too good to be true.

There is **No** reason "spin" also has the **same** "Bohr magneton" !

*(Sp-3) Bohr model has "reason" of Bohr magneton.*

Then why does Bohr's orbit have the magnetic moment = Bohr magneton, which **doesn't** decrease ? There is a **convincing** reason in Bohr model.

Bohr's orbit must be an interger times de Broglie wavelength to keep electron's *phase* **stable**, which gives the same energies as Schrodinger hydrogen.

When it's an *integer* times de Broglie wavelength, the angular momentum is quantized ( an *integer* × **ħ** ), too.

When the quantized angular momentum is **ħ** (= 1 × de Broglie wavelength ), its magnetic momentum **becomes** Bohr magneton (= μ_{B} ).

This is the reason why Bohr magneton in Bohr's orbit is *stable*, **Not** decreasing. It can explain H atom magnetic moment.

On the other hand, electron *spinning* **cannot** use this logic of "an integer times de Broglie wavelength ". So **only** Bohr model has a **good** reason !

So you easily find, relying on this **unreal** spin leads to the present university's *exorbitant* tuition
for useless science.

*(Ro-1) Why unreal quasiparticles are rampant ? *

The present physics faces **critical** situation, filled with various **unreality**, parallel universe and extradimensions.

What's the **root** of these *evils* ?

The root is "quantum mechanics", which cannot solve three-body problem.

To predict three-body (= multi-electron ) motion, we have to actually compute each Coulomb force and correct their motions at short time intervals.

But quantum wavefunction just gives "**vague** probability" with **no** clear electrons' orbits. So we cannot use the usual methods in three-body planetary orbits !

Different from solvable H atom, it's **impossible** to find a single common helium ground state energy. All they can do is choose *fake* wavefunction.

"**Choose**" means quantum mechanics **cannot** *predict* any physical values.

So all physicists rely on is **unreal** quasiparticle and fake ab-initio DFT.

This **useless** quantum theory **destroys** careers of all students now.

*(Ro-2) Physicists need imaginary target = quantum computer.*

If *basic* quantum theory remains useless, physicists have **nothing** to do.

So they needed to create "**imaginary**" target = quantum computer.

They paid attention to doubtful probabilistic nature in quantum superposition where a cat can be dead **and** alive at the same time.

Of course, we **cannot** see a grotesque "dead and alive" cat directly.

But they abused this **absurd** logic in entanglement and quantum computer.

They misinterpret "1 or 2 *unknown*" as "1 and 2 states **coexist**" !

So the moment they see "1 state", entangled "2 state" is confirmed (= spooky ) ?

Quantum computer calculates "different numbers" using **parallel** worlds ? Of course we cannot confirm this "**fantasy**" parallel worlds, so a waste of money.

*(Ro-3) Quantum + Einstein = QED → 10 dimensions string !*

If quantum theory remains useless, there are **nothing** to do.

This is the reason they exploited Einstein as relativistic field theory (= QED ).

Physicists needed some "**virtual** targets" such as relativistic symmetry in quantum theory with **no** contents.

In fact, Einstein relativity includes fatal paradoxes.

And Black hole is just **fiction**, cannot form within age of universe !

Furthermore, this relativistic theory produced *unreal* virtual particles, which **contradicts** relativity ! And the calculated results always diverge to infinity.

Using *irrational* math trick ( ∞ = ∞ + finite ), they could get any values as they like. So this QED is **meaningless** as physics. Even Dirac and Feynman **disliked** it.

Despite this contradiction, physicists craved for "**imaginary** target" and rule (= relativity, symmetry ) as "*incentive*" which produced unreal particles.

So the **root** of all these evils is "quantum mechanics" with no useful contents, which needs "imaginary" target (= incentive ).

*(De-1) The only unified theory = unreal string !*

Einstein dream was really 10 dimensional string theory with parallel universes ? In fact Einstein hated quantum mechanics as "spooky".

So their "Einstein dream" is **misleading**.

Now, the only theory of everything is string (or 11 dimension M ) theory !

So if you **don't** believe *unreal* "extradimension", you **cannot** enjoy worldwide fame like Hawking and Lisa.

Witten is a titan of string theory. But **all** string theorists believe wrong math ( 1+2+3+ .. = ∞ = -1/12 ! ) He is really a "math expert" ?

String theory filled with abstract symbols has No physical images of particle. It includes 10^{500} different worlds, which **cannot** predict any physical values.

So **useless** except in ( social ) media.

Even critic, Woit **feeds** on "string vs. anti battle" with no progress.

The serious problem is these theories are just increasing **victims** of wrong science in new students now !

*(De-2) "Relativistic" QED disobeys Einstein !*

Though the media repeats "Einstein dream", his theory "**special** relativity" already forms the **basis** of the current physics.

So if Einstein relativity includes fatal flaws, it's **harmful** to students in all fields ! In fact, relativity **contradicts** two-slit and magnetic force.

Relativity without medium must rely on *unreal* virtual particles and Big Bang in force and uniform microwaves.

Black hole **cannot** be formed within age of universe, despite their papers. General relativity is useless even in the **only** practical use, GPS.

So if students ( and school dropouts ) suffering from debt **sue** universities and the media for hiding true paradoxes, they could surely win back their money.

This news is **misleading**, too. because gravitational wave is *unreal* "**pseudo**tensor", which **vanishes** by observer, so Einstein **never** accepted it.

*(Es-1) "Entangle" is another name for "unknown".*

"Sorry, Einstein" means spooky action at a distance was confirmed ?

The problem is these news do not try to make ordinary people understand.

Because if they tell the truth, people notice entanglement (= spooky action ) is unreal with **no** meaning.

In fact, entanglement is based on far-fetched interpretation.

Suppose one of A and B atoms is in "up" state, and another is "down" state.

We **don't** know which A or B is "up (down)" in Es-1 upper.

Like Schrodinger cat, they try to **mis**interpret "unknown" as "superposition".

State 1 or 2 is **unknwon** = Different **worlds** 1 and 2 **coexist** at the *same* time ?

Quantum mechanics just considers "classical uncertainty" as "many-worlds" !

There is **no** spooky (= superluminal ) action here.

Einstein was *right* **only** in this entanglement except relativity.

*(Es-2) "Down" emits many photons, "up" remains dark.*

If electron spin is real spinning, its speed far exceeds light speed.

So in this experiment, they **didn't** see *unreal* spin itself.

They use two different energy levels in nitrogen as "up" and "down".

So the name "spin" is **misleading**.

By illuminating those atoms with some light, they change between these two energy levels. To know up or down state, they use another "detection light".

When illuminating the atom with the detection light, **only** "*down*" state is excited and **emits** many photons (= light ).

When the atom is in "*up*" state, it remains "dark", **not** emitting photons.

See the original paper ( p.3 right ).

*(Es-3) Photons from "down" are detected at C, D.*

In this experiment, these emitted photons are **divided** and sent to the distant **C** and the near D after illuminated with detection light.

By reducing the amount of light, a photodetector at C responds once (= one photon ? ), when the photon reaches there.

Of course, we **cannot** see a *fictional* photon itself.

They just interpret photodetector's weak light **signal** as a "photon".

So when the photodetector at C detects "one photon", it means **only** A ( or B ) is "**down**", emitting photons.

They illuminate both atoms again to change between "up" and "down" just after the first detection, and apply detection light to them, again.

So detecting a photon, a photon in succession means one of A and B is "up", another is "down" ( this p.2 ).

*(Es-4) Mix photon paths from A and B → entangle ?*

They **overlap**ped photons from A and B on a beam-splitter just **before** C.

It makes detected photon **in**distinguishable from A or B.

So we **don't** know **which**, A or B emitted a photon detected at C.

They just call this *unknown* origin "**entangle**ment" (= parallel-worlds ).

This is a very far-fetched interpretation !

We just **don't** know whether A or B atom is "up" ( or "down" ) *classical*ly.

But quantum mechanics claims this mixed photon from "**unknown**" origin means "two different **worlds** *coexist*" ( world-1: A-down, B-up, world-2; A-up, B-down ).

Just after this "entangled" state is confirmed at C, the near D detector in A **or** B detects another photon, and confirm which is "down" instantly (= spooky ? )

They claim long distance between A and B excluded slower-than-light link (= loop hole free ). But it relies on **un**realistic interpretation, so meaningless.

Universities should pay **back** tuition to students in useless science !

See also the previous version of criticizing top journals.

2015/12/15 updated. Feel free to link to this site.