(Q-1) ↓ An electron splits into everywhere in
There are still many deadly, incurable diseases in the world.
Cancer is incurable, even the simplest common cold can't be cured.
So the current raging corona virus is much more impossible to eradicate in today's "science" and technology. Why ?
What's the point of today's "education" if science taught in school makes No progress, students are just indoctrinated with "science illusion" ?
All humans, cancer cells, viruses are made of "atoms".
If today's only atomic theory = quantum mechanics could tell us about "atomic behavior" correctly, we could have already eradicated and cured all these deadly diseases and viruses at the "atomic level" safely. But still it cannot.
Because quantum mechanics is doomed to fail in explaining atomic behavior in a practical way, it's just getting us nowhere, no matter what physicists try to do based on that "failed" theory . Here we explain why.
Separating a real particle from wave is impossible for quantum mechanics which can only express each electron as nonphysical wavefunction that can tell us nothing about the exact location of an electron.
Quantum wavefunction which allegedly means "ambiguous probability" of finding an electron in each location, always spreads everywhere as ghostly electron cloud.
It means each electron always exists in every place simultaneously using fictional parallel worlds ( or philosopher's mind ) according to purportedly "state-of-the-art" quantum mechanics ( this p.6 ) which is actually too "occult" for any physicists to understand.
The total energy = the sum of electron's kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy (= between an electron and nucleus + between all electrons in multi-electron atoms ) must be always conserved and constant wherever electrons are inside atomic wavefunction.
Schrödinger equation which quantum mechanics tries to solve to find its exact solution (= wavefunction ) giving the constant total energy E, is the only way to find electron's allegedly "exact bahavior" inside atom conserving total energy E.
One-electron hydrogen atom is the only atom which can solve Schrödinger equation and find exact solution (= wavefunction ) giving the conserved, constant total energy E value = lowest total (= ground-state ) energy E of hydrogen atom becomes constant = -13.6 eV ( this p.5 ).
In all other multi-electron atoms and molecules, it is impossible to solve Schrödinger equation or find exact solution giving constant total energy E. It means the total energy is Not conserved in any "unsolvable" multi-electron atoms in quantum mechanics. ← Quantum mechanics is false.
Because in uncanny quantum mechanical electron cloud, each electron must exist everywhere, so the distance between two electrons is randomly changeable and undetermined, hence, Coulomb potential energy between electrons and total energies are undetermined (= total energy is Not constant or conserved in atoms with more than one electrons ).
In multi-electron atoms, for example, helium with two electrons, if Schrödinger equation for helium was solvable, and we could luckily find helium exact solution (= it never happens, though ), this imaginary helium solution (= wavefunction ) would be an "unrealistic form" splitting into three independent unreal hydrogen atoms to cancel three randomly-changeable Coulomb potential terms for getting constant total energy E, which is impossible.
So finding exact solution of multi-electron Schrödinger equation is intrinsically impossible, no matter what approximate solution physicists try.
All quantum mechanics can do is "choose" fake solution called trial function or basis set which can take arbitrary forms (= so, the solution of multi-electron Schrödinger equation is undetermined ), and integrate the whole equation (= putting Schrödinger energy equation H between chosen fake wavefunctions ) to obtain fake total energy, instead of solving it.
There is No limitation to the form of this chosen fake solution, so we can choose any arbitrary forms of fake wavefunctions with freely-adjustable parameters giving any (fake) energy you want.
So all seemingly correct energy values of multi-electron Schrödinger equations in textbooks are just artificially "chosen" values which are Not obtained by solving Schrödinger equation.
This quantum mechanical illegitimate method of artificially choosing convenient fake solution is physically invalid, useless, cannot determine or predict any true atomic energies (= due to "unsolvable" ), which quantum mechanical deceitful method is a kind of "art" rather than science.
Integrating Schrödinger equation with fake wavefunction (= "unsolvable", so cannot give constant total energy, instead, it includes many different total energy E values in different electrons' positions ) means the obtained (fake) total energy E is just "average expectation value" of a collection of many different total energies ( this p.172 ) in different electron's positions.
This expectation (= average ) energy value in multi-electron Schrödinger's atom is just fake, Not a true conserved or constant single total energy E value, because true conserved total energy E must be common and constant in any different electron's positions as shown in the solvable hydrogen atom.
The problem is this electron probability wavefunction (= cloud ) cannot intrinsically bind two atoms to form molecular bond in a normal way using Coulomb force as binding force, so quantum mechanics is false, again.
In hydrogen atomic wavefunction, electron cloud is always distributed symmetrically and evenly around the central nucleus = the electron's "probability" in all directions on the left and right sides ( upper and lower sides ) of the central nucleus is the same, as long as the distance between the electron and nucleus is the same.
A negative electron cloud distributed symmetrically around the central positive nucleus is equivalent to "symmetrical spherical negative charge" whose Coulomb potential distribution is equal to Coulomb potential around a point-like negatively charged particle located in the same position as the central positive nucleus (= just like a negative electron cloud and positive nucleus overlap each other in the same position ).
So the net charge of a negative electron cloud and positive nucleus overlapping in the same position is always neutral = zero, which cannot generate Coulomb force or bind other atoms for forming molecular bond.
Quantum mechanical wavefunction just "mixes up" electron's particle and de Broglie wave pictures as "one nonphysical wavefunction" which allegedly means "probability" of finding an electron in each position.
To form hydrogen molecule (= H2 ), a negatively-charged elecron-1 ( of H atom-1 ) has to approach the other positively-charged nucleus-2 ( of H atom-2 ), and avoid the other negatively-charged electron-2 obeying Coulomb force to lower Coulomb potential energy → lower total energy → stable molecular bond.
To generate this Coulomb attractive force enough to form normal molecular bond, the electron-1 needs to move to the right side of the nucleus-1 and approach the other nucleus-2 ( this figure, right real H2 molecule ) to lower Coulomb potential ( or total ) energy.
But quantum mechanical electron "probability" cloud can neither move to one side of a nucleus nor approach the other nucleus, so forming molecular bond by Coulomb attractive force is impossible in quantum mechanics !
For the electron cloud to be confined or localized in only one side (= one place ) of the nucleus, the probability wavefunction must be sharper and narrower in one particular position where an electron is localized.
The narrower wavefunction to localize an electron only in one particular position means "shorter de Broglie wavelength" which increases electron's momentum and kinetic energy drastically, then, the total energy would also increase drastically, surpass the experimental value of the actual molecular energy.
Therefore, it is impossible for nonphysical electron's "probability" wavefunction or cloud to move and be localized in one particular place like a realistic moving particle.
Hence, the electron cloud in quantum mechanics must always spread all over the space symmetrically around the nucleus, and cannot approach the other positive nucleus or avoid the other negative electron to generate Coulomb attractive force enough to form molecular bond.
Real Coulomb force cannot be used (= so lowering Coulomb potential energy → lower total energy → foming molecular bond is impossible ) in quantum mechanics.
The only way left to lower total energy is lowering kinetic energy in an illegitimate way violating energy conservation law and Virial theorem.
Schrödinger equation for H2 molecule (= consisting of two electrons and two nuclei ) is unsolvable. Quantum mechanics often chooses two hydrogen (= H ) atomic wavefunctions approximately as fake H2 molecule solution.
Quantum mechanics needs to choose the nonphysical form of solution called "(anti-)symmetric wavefuncton" as fake molecular solution where the electron-1 must always exist in two different H atoms-1 and 2 simultaneously using "parallel worlds".
So quantum mechanics discarded the realistic atomic picture where each individual electron belongs to a different atom, and forces all individual electrons originally belonging to different atoms or nuclei to get "jumbled up" and indistinguishable, like those uncanny electrons are coexisting in all different atoms or places simultaneously !
By putting Schrödinger enegy equation H between chosen (anti-)symmetric forms of fake wavefunctions and integrate it, each term of the integral results includes two kinds of strange integral: Coulomb integral and nonphysical "exchange" integral ( this p.14 ).
Coulomb integral represents normal Coulomb force or energy where the electron-1 probability is expressed as the product of two identical probability wavefunctions (= φ1 (e1 ) φ1 (e1 ) or φa (e1 ) φa (e1 ) represents the probability of the electron-1's charge belonging to H atom-1 ).
The "exchange" integral is an unrealistic and contradictory concept, which cannot be described by any real physical objects ( this p.11 ) on the earth, because this strange "exchange" integral is different from the normal electron's probability wavefunction form (= product of two identical wavefunctions ).
This unphysical "exchange integral" is the key "dirty trick" to lower kinetic energy illegitimately in quantum mechanical (unreal) molecule.
For example, one form of this exchange integral is putting Schrödinger energy equation H between two different electron-1 wavefunctions: one belonging to H atom-1 (= φ1 (e1) ) from the right side and another electron-1 wavefunction belonging to H atom-2 (= φ2 (e1) ) from the left side (= ∫ φ2 (e1) H φ1 (e1) = exchange integral ).
The kinetic energy operator (= derivative form ) inside Schrödinger energy equation H acts on the right-side hydrogen atom-1 wavefunction of electron-1 (= kinetic energy derivative inside H acts on φ1 (e1) of ∫ φ2 (e1) H φ1 (e1) ).
This hydrogen atom-1 wavefunction (= φ1 (e1) ) conserves total energy (= electron's kinetic energy + Coulomb potential energy between electron-1 and nucleus-1 ) only inside the original hydrogen atom-1.
As the negative electron-1 moves farther away from the positive nucleus-1 (= then, Coulomb potential energy becomes higher ) towards the other nucleus-2, the electron-1's kinetic energy is lowered to cancel higher Coulomb potential energy and keep constant (= conserved ) total energy E.
But as the electron-1 moves farther away from the nucleus-1, the electron-1 is closer to the other positive nucleus-2 and after all, it lowers Coulomb potential energy (= between electron-1 and nucleus-2 ) again. But the electron-1's kinetic energy remains lowered even when the electron-1 approaches the other nucleus-2 by Coulomb attraction.
So in quantum mechanical unreal H2 molecule, the electron-1's kinetic energy keeps lowering around the other nucleus-2, though Coulomb potential energy between the negative elecron-1 and positive nucleus-2 is also getting lower near the nucleus-2. (= total energy = kinetic energy + Coulomb potential energy is Not conserved or constant between the electron-1 and nucleus-2 ).
Because around the original nucleus-1, the electron-1's kinetic enrgy is higher to cancel lower Coulomb potential energy between the electron-1 and nucleus-1, but around the other nucleus-2, the electron-1's kinetic energy keeps lowering, even though Coulomb potential energy between the electron-1 and nucleus-2 becomes lower (= total energy = kinetic energy + Coulomb potentian energy is no longer constant or conserved between around nucleus-1 and around nucleus-2 ).
This means quantum mechanics deliberately allows the electron-1's kinetic energy to keep lowering even when the electron-1 approaches the other nucleus-2 to lower Coulomb potential energy, lower total energy (= no longer constant or conserved ) and generate fake molecular bond energy illegitimately (= by keeping lowering kientic energy due to violating total energy conservation ).
To lower the electron-1 kinetic energy (= and then, lower total energy by violating energy conservation law ) further, they need to expand this "lower-kinetic-energy area" around the other nucleus-2 using nonphysical exchange integral.
The electron-1 "probability" (= φ1 (e1) ) decreases as it moves farther away from the nucleus-1 towards the other nucleus-2. By exchanging hydrogen-1 for hydrogen-2 wavefunction (= φ1 (e1) → φ2 (e1) ) keeping the same electron-1, this hydrogen-2 wavefunction including electron-1 can increase the probability of electron-1 around nucleus-2 in unphysical "exchange integral".
So by multiplying lower-kinetic-energy area (= φ1 (e1) ) of low-probability electron-1 by "exchanged hydrogen-2 wavefunction" (= φ2 (e1) ) with high-probability electron-1, quantum mechanics deliberately expands the "illegitimately lowered kinetic energy area" of electron-1 around the other nucleus-2 to lower total energy and generate fake molecular bond.
In quantum mechanics, normal Coulomb force is Not working (= Coulomb attractive force between two atoms surrounded by foggy electron clouds is too weak ). Hence, Coulomb (potential) integral is physically meaningless, far less influential than unphysical exchange integral in Schrödinger's molecule.
Surprisingly, this "exchange energy" which cannot be explained by any real physical objects, is the main generator of (fake) molecular bond energy in quantum mechanics ( this p.3, this p.101-102, this p.15-16, this p.4 Figure.1 ). ← Quantum mechanics is unrealistic.
These ghost-like "indistinguishable" electrons needed to generate nonphysical "exchange energy" make it impossible to use quantum mechanics as a practical basic atomic tool for applied science or nano-technology dealing with many-electron interactions.
For example, when we want to predict chemical reaction at the atomic level, we need to calculate "actual forces" between different atoms to know in which direction each atom will be pulled or pushed by other different atoms or electrons.
To calculate actual forces between two different atoms, the first thing we need to do is determine and define "individual electron's distribution" specific to each of two different atoms.
But unrealistic quantum mechanics, where all electrons are unreasonably indistinguishable losing their own individuality, forbids us from distinguishing electrons belonging to different kinds of atoms (= each electron is No longer specific to the original atom ).
When calculating Coulomb force (= this is useless and too weak to explain molecular bond in quantum mechanics, as I said ) between two different atoms with different electron's distributions, we need to define different individual electron's distribution specific to each differently-structured atoms, and then, we need to calculate Coulomb force between the electron-1 specific to atom-1 and electron-2 specific to atom-2.
But quantum mechanics says the electron-1 (= or 2 ) must exist in two different atoms simultaneously due to unnatural "indistinguishable" rule (= so all electrons always have the same "indistinguishable" distribution spreading over all atoms ), using parallel worlds where we cannot separate individual electron-1 (= atom-1 ) from electron-2 (= atom-2 ), and calculating actual force between inseparable, indistinguishable atom-1 and atom-2 is impossible.
Unrealistic electron spin (= spinning faster-than-light !?) was introduced to seemingly explain this unphysical exchange energy which is inexplicable by any other real physical objects except unreal "spin".
The idea that each electron belongs to different individual atom is meaningless in uncanny quantum mechanics which just mixes up all individual atoms and electrons as one indistinguishable pseudo-quasi-electron model and bogus approximation called density functional theory (= DFT ) or band model.
In this quantum mechanical unphysical material where a distinguishable individual electron No longer exists, physicists have to rely on "unreal quasiparticle model" with fictitious (= effective ) mass ( which mass can be unrealistically negative ! ) and charge to explain all many-electron physical phenomena such as superconductor, semiconductor, graphenes and solar cells.
Now all physicists blindly try to use unrealistic one-pseudo-electron approximate calculation method called DFT ( this p.3 ) to compute (fake) energy in many-electron materials such as semiconductor and proteins.
DFT approximate quantum method emerged as the new savior of useless quantum mechanics which cannot treat many-electron materials due to its unrealistically "indistinguishable" ghost-like electrons (= cloud ). But in fact, this DFT has nothing to do with reality or even the original quantum mechanics.
Because DFT forcibly replaced the whole "many different electrons" (= electrons are indistinguishable and impractical also in original Schrödinger equation ) by only one single pseudo-electron model.
In one-pseudo-electron DFT model, the so-called (anti-)symmetric description ( which needs many ghost-like indistinguishable electrons ) by quantum mechanics is impossible, so computing nonphysical exchange ( or Coulomb ) energy integral is impossible in DFT, too.
So DFT replaced the original Coulomb potential and unphysical exchange energy by unrelated non-interacting pseudo-potential called "exchange-correlation functional" which has nothing to do with real world or original quantum mechanical "exchange energy", despite their confusing similar name (= "exchange" ).
The correct form of this pseudo-potential energy in DFT, which has nothing to do with real objects, is unknown, so this pseudo-exchange potential energy form has to be artificially chosen from among infinite possible choices.
It means DFT method is intrinsically useless, and always fails ( this p.17 ), DFT cannot predict any physical values due to its unknown, undetermined, nonphysical "exchange" pseudo-potential.
The problem is this quantum mechanical unreal quasiparticle model and one-pseudo-electron DFT approximate calculation method is the only "point of contact" between all the current unrealistic physics originating from quantum mechanics 100 years ago and actual physical phenomena, accoding to today's "mainstream" science.
So as long as physicists refuse to replace this unrealistic quantum mechanical model by other more practical theory, it is impossible for us to make any progress in applied science such as medicine and nanotechnology which is necessary to utilize microscopic atomic behavior and real atomic "forces" for practical use and curing diseases forever.
For example, the current Einstein cosmology is devoted to imaginary wormhole, extra-dimensions, black hole and tries to find evidence of fictional parallel universes by staring at irrelevant cosmic microwave background in vain.
The only "point of contact" between this fictional Einstein cosmology and real world is said to be GPS clock time correction.
But there are many other realistic factors such as atmosphere which can cause GPS time error in various ways, so distinguishing the sources of very tiny sensitive clock time errors is almost impossible.
Actually, GPS clock time needs to be corrected almost real-time by comparing it with ground-station's clocks on the earth, regardless of whether tiny Einstein relativistic effect is true or not. So Einstein's tiny, tiny relativistic effect is easily hidden in various other large factors.
Hence, Einstein relativity is intrinsically useless, meaningless in GPS time correction.
When we can consider different factors such as atmosphere besides Einstein relativity in GPS time error, the "differential diagnosis" to find which theory includes fatal flaw or paradox is necessary.
Einstein relativity always includes fatal paradoxes of time where we can never know which moving satellite's clock runs slower, so Einstein relativity with self-contradiction is false and safely excluded from the source of GPS time error.
It means there is No realistic "point of contact" between all other Einstein fictional cosmology and our real world. Hence, Einstein theory has nothing to do with real physical phenomena.
Also in the current fictional particle physics and CERN, physicists just "imagine" illusory unstable particles (= directly undetectable ) only inside their heads or inside "virtual circumstances" (= isolated from real world ) such as particle colliders.
As long as particle physicists cannot take those doubtful ghost-like, illusive particles out of virtual colliders into the real world for practical use, there is No realistic "point of contact" between these current useless particle physics and actual world (= outside of collider ).
So today's particle physics is dead-end, going nowhere, and gigantic colliders are just a waste of taxpayers' money = meaningless except for bloggers
Quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) is false, because unreal virtual particles are originally self-contradictory.
Actually, there is No "point of contact" between real world and unphysical QED or virtual particles which No current physicists utilize in practical science or daily life.
Because all QED can do is said to predict imaginary infinite bare charge or infinite bare mass of an electron allegedly surrounded by infinite amounts of unreal ghost-like virtual particles, both of which are unobservable, unmeasurable, hence, physically meaningless.
So QED, which tries to "predict" unobservable infinity values by artificial tricks called "renormalization", is physically meaningless, too ( this p.4 ).
It is safe to say very tiny physical values such as g-factor or Lamb shift can be caused by some other realistic factors such as multi-charged particles' tiny fluctuating motion or something, without unreal virtual particles or meaningless unobservable QED infinity.
Anyway, the only "point of contact" between actual physical phenomena and the current fictional physics such as quantum mechanics, particle physics, QED virtual particle is unreal quasiparticle model and unphysical one pseudo-electron DFT method originating from unrealistically indistinguishable ghost-like quantum mechanical electron cloud.
So unless we replace this current unrealistic "point of contact" between actual physical phenomena and basic atomic theory by other realistic one, utilizing atomic bahavior for practical science or curing deadly diseases would be just a pipe dream forever.
Realistic atomic theory must use real "distinguishable" moving electrons, and of course, real Coulomb "forces" is essential as a practical atomic tool to explain actual larger molecules and physical phenomena.
Unfortunately, this realistic atomic model was impossible in 1920s when there were No modern computers to calculate dynamic complicated multi-electron motions, which was extremely difficult three-body problem.
See this week physics is still useless.
(P-1) ↓ Photoelectric effect = electron absorbs "virtual" ?
Einstein's famous photoelectric effect is said to prove light can behave like a particle called a "photon".
But the photoelectric effect has nothing to do with fantasy "photon".
It just demonstrated an electron absorbing light with "short wavelength" (= hence, wave nature of light ! ) is ejected from an atom.
The truth is that it is physically impossible for an electron to absorb or emit a real photon in photoelectric effect. So Einstein is false.
We all know the total energy E (= the sum of kinetic + potential energies of all particles ) is always conserved.
At the same time, the total momentum p (= product of a particle's mass m times its velocity v ) is always conserved, too.
Photoelectric effect says when an electron at rest (= kinetic energy is zero ) absorbs a photon with energy E, the electron's kinetic energy increases by exactly the same amount E as the photon's energy the electron absorbs, and the 'juiced up' electron starts to move.
According to the total energy conservation law, the magnitude of the incoming photon energy E must be just equal to the magnitude of the resultant kinetic energy E of the electron which absorbs the whole photon.
The total momentum must be conserved, too. So the incoming photon's momentum p must be equal to the resultant electron's momentum pe ( p = pe ).
But this momentum can never be conserved, though it must be conserved according to the physical principle.
Because the ratio (= E/p ) of energy (= E ) to momentum (= p ) is different between the photon and the electron, which fact makes it impossible to conserve both energy and momentum at the same time.
The incoming photon's momentum (= p ) is equal to the photon's energy E divided by the photon (= light ) speed c ( p = E/c ).
The momentum (= pe = mv ) of the resultant electron absorbing photon's energy E is equal to 2E divided by the electron's speed v ( pe = 2E/v ), as shown in the upper figure.
The light speed c is much higher than the electron's speed v ( c > v ), so the photon's momentum p is much smaller than the electron's momentum pe ( p < pe ), when their energy E is the same. ← The total momentum between photon and electron is Not conserved, when total energy E is conserved.
As a result, it is impossible to conserve both total energy and momentum in Einstein photoelectric effect where an electron absorbing a photon obtains kinetic energy and escapes from an atom. ← Einstein's photon violates basic physical rule (= energy-momentum conservation ), so unreal.
Einstein ad-hoc relativistic theory dismissed the existence of "medium" filling space. So the space constains "nothing" according to Einstein.
In this Einstein empty space, there are neither 'guideposts' nor beacons which tell us where and how fast each particle is actually moving on the "blank" space map.
So in Einstein's uncanny space, there is no such thing as "absolute" space. All things are "relative", any physical properties such as velocity and kinetic energy are undetermined and varying, seen by different observers.
An electron at rest (= ① in upper figure ) absorbs a photon, acquires kinetic energy and starts to move with speed v (= ② ) rightward seen by an observer at rest with respect to the stationary electron ①.
But seen by another observer moving with speed v rightward (= lower part in this figure ), the initial electron ① appears to be moving leftward (= instead of 'at rest' ) at speed v, and then stop after absorbing a photon energy. ← This supernatural phenomenon can never happen in real world.
Because this moving observer witnesses paradoxical situation where an electron, which should increase its (kinetic) energy after absorbing photon energy, does the 'opposite thing' = decreases its kinetic energy and stops after obtaining the photon's energy E (= ② in lower part of this figure ) !
This paradoxical situation is caused by Einstein's unrealistically "empty" space or "blank" map.
In fact, the electron's kinetic energy and momentum are intrinsically "relative" concepts with respect to "other external things" such as "medium" or "beacon" interacting with electron.
Therefore, there is No such thing as "absolute kinetic energy" or momentum. The situation where an electron "actually has" some amount of kinetic energy ( or momentum ) in the completely empty space is impossible.
So in the empty space favored by Einstein relativity, it is impossible for an electron to absorb a photon, "obtain" new (kinetic) energy and momentum in photoelectric effect. ← This sounds strange, but it is true.
As a result, the current physics "gave up reality", and started to say an electron cannot emit a real photon, only "unreal virtual photon" can "supernaturally" interact with an electron in photoelectric effect and electromagnetic force.
Physicists use nonphysical, abstract Feynman diagram to describe interaction between electrons and photons.
In this Feynman diagram, both energy and momentum must be conserved.
Using this energy-momentum conservation law and Einstein relativistic equation, we find virtual photon (= absorbed or emitted by an electron ) must have unphysical "imaginary" mass (= virtual photon's mass squared can unrealistically become negative, m2 < 0, this p.3 ).
This virtual photon is obviously a self-contradictory concept, and shows Einstein relativistic "photon" is wrong, does Not really exist, because virtual photon cannot satisfy Einstein relativistic energy-momentum equation ( this p.5 ).
So Einstien's photon is just literally 'virtual' without reality.
Photoelectric effect described by the current quantum mechanics and Einstein must rely on this "unreal virtual particles", hence all the current mainstream theories lack reality due to their inherent fatal self-contradiction.
All phenomena such as light interference, refraction, "light wavelength change" in Compton scattering show light is actually "wave" traveling through some "medium".
So all the actually measured physical properties such as wavelength, energy, momentum of light, sound, electron's de Broglie wave are generated with respect to interacting with some "external medium" as "beacon", instead of Einstein's absolute empty space or blank map.
If we believe in Einstein's ad-hoc theory where there is no such thing as "real medium" in space, a single electron has to pass through two slits simultaneously to inferfere with itself using illusory parallel worlds.
Without real medium in space, it causes "de Broglie wave paradox".
A stationary observer actually sees de Broglie wave interference of an electron, while another observer moving at the same speed as an electron, the electron's speed v appears to be zero, = No electron's de Broglie wave(length) is generated, hence, electron's de Broglie wave interference pattern appears to disapper or reappear seen by a moving or a stationary observer. ← Einstein paradox !
Physicists just roughly treat "light wave" with energy enough to kick out an electron from an atom as a fictitious "photon" without specifying any detailed shape or size of an imaginary single photon.
In uncanny quantum mechanics, each electron always has to spread all over space as "electron probability cloud" mixing up electron's particle and wave pictures as one nonphysical wavefunction.
So the clear separation of a "particle" from "wave" is impossible in quantum mechanics, where an electron particle exists everywhere simultaneously using its nonphysical "probability" wave nature = fictional parallel worlds.
Inside this strange quantum mechanical foggy electron cloud, an electron cannot realistically avoid other negative electrons or approach other positive nuclei. ← Coulomb force is Not normally working, ← distance between electrons is disorderly, random ← Total energy can Not be conserved ← Hence, finding exact solutions which give conserved (= constant ) total energy value E in Schrödinger equation of any multi-electron atoms is impossible.
So unrealistic quantum mechanical electron cloud has to rely on some "dirty tricks" to generate (fake) molecular bond energy by violating total energy conservation law and lowering kinetic energy illegitimately, because real Coulomb force is unavailable .
To treat atomic, molecular structures and Coulomb forces realistically (= without relying on quantum mechanical parallel worlds ), we need to separate an electron "particle" from its de Broglie "wave" generated in the "medium" around the electron.
Unfortunately, this realistic atomic model which must calculate complicated, dynamic multi-electron motions (= three-body problem ) was impossible in 1920s when there were No modern computers and physicists had no choice but to accept unrealistic quantum mechanical model.
If an electron tries to absorb or emit a photon (= a particle of light ) in the Einstein empty space, this photon must be an unreal virtual photon with nonphysical imaginary mass, when the total energy and momentum are conserved between the electron and the fictitious photon.
Hence, the only realistic solution is a real electron needs to absorb or emit "light wave" through friction against the external "medium" around the electron to conserve total momentum and energy safely without relying on self-contradictory virtual photon.
When an orbital length of a moving electrons is not an integer times de Broglie wavelength, an electron crashes into its destructive de Broglie wave (= friction against the surrounding medium ) and loses energy, emitting electromagnetic wave in the direction perpendicular to the initial electron moving (= crashing ) direction.
Each electron is orbiting around a heavy nucleus, bound by nuclear positive charge (= so the total momentum of an electron and a nucleus bound together is always almost zero, regardless of their total energy values ).
The "crashing energy" between a moving electron and its destructive de Broglie wave (= these two crashing things have about the same magnitude of momentum, move in the opposite direction and crash into each other, so their resultant total momentum is zero ) is stored as medium's "potential ( spring-like ) energy" which soon becomes the "oscillating energy" in the transverse (= crashing ) direction (= this energy is detected by photo-electric effect ).
This crashing energy oscillating in the transverse direction is pushed out from the point where an moving electron crashes into the opposite de Broglie wave in the perpendicular direction (= longitudinal = light traveling direction in which momentum is detected by Compton scattering ) as "electromagnetic wave".
This resultant light wave has small momentum in longitudinal (= light traveling ) direction, and high oscillating energy in the transverse (= electron's crashing ) direction, which is compatible with light's high energy compared to low momentum, hence, safely conserves both energy and momentum in interaction with an electron with different ratio of energy to momentum.
So using real moving electrons, de Broglie wave generated around them and light wave actually traveling in the medium with various wavelength, we can explain all atomic bahavior without self-contradiction, quantum mechanical parallel-worlds or paradoxical virtual photons.
But as long as the obsolete useless quantum mechanics is used, physicists have to rely on unreal quasiparticle model, faster-than-light spin and bogus one-electron DFT approximation, whenever they treat many-electron materials or solid-physics to interpret the measured physical phenomena.
And physicists needed to make up "illusory scientific goals" such as parallel-world quantum computer, information, God-particle, nonphysical symmetry to deceive governments and continue to get research fund from taxpayers' money, while the current old-fashioned school system is 'harmful' rather than beneficial, indoctrinating students with fake science.
QED method using these unreal virtual particles is used only for negligibly tiny values such as g-factor and Lamb shift which are too small to be useful for our daily life, so meaningless scientific area.
Actually, No current physicists use this useless QED with virtual photons in practical science or daily life. ← It means it is safe to say all these ad-hoc QED tricks are unnecessary, unreal and can be replaced by (= incorporated into ) other more general and realistic explanation or theory.
We have No trouble even if there were No virtual particles (= which just include self-contradiction, so false ) and ad-hoc QED interpretation of negligibly tiny values is replaced by other more realistic factors such as some "artifact" or multi-charged particles' tiny fluctuating motion without unreal virtual particles.
QED calculation results always diverge to "infinity" due to infinite unreal virtual particles' effect ( this p.4 ). So it just artificially subtracts "arbitrary infinity" from the "infinite calculation result" by illegitimate tricks called "renormalization" to get meaninglessly tiny (= freely-adjustable by QED trick ) physical values which are useless in our daily life.
Even founders criticized this ad-hoc QED renormalization method forcibly removing "infinity" as "hocus-pocus" and it must be fundamentally changed, admitting fatal flaws inherent in QED virtual particles.
Physics professors turned into "pseudo-political analysts", science-fiction writers to sell only "literature" books, pursuing illusory "theory of everything" with unreal extradimensions, forgetting practical use of real "physics". Because there is No longer "reality" in the current physics.
See this week physics is still useless.
(S-1) ↓ Unreal virtual photon, parallel worlds by
All students are probably taught "energy conservation law" as one of the most important and fundamental physical rules in schools.
Any real objects in this universe have to obey this basic physical principle, because energy is neither created out of nothing nor vanishes like a 'ghost'.
According to this physical law, the sum of the particle's kinetic energy and potential energy is the total energy which must be always conserved and constant.
But in fact, the current mainstream science = Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics blatantly defy this basic physical law, meaning their theories are false.
This is why "theory of everything" combining Einstein and quantum mechanics embraces fantasy unseen dimensions, and colleges deceive students, saying "you need (unreal) extra-dimensions".
Physicists use their pseudo-science and universities only for selling "literature" books, worshiping Einstein's ancient legacy and history as "religion", their impractical extra-dimensions were exploited even by sex-offender Epstein.
All of the so-called "Einstein's tests" can be safely replaced by other more realistic theory or interpretation, invalidating Einstein relativity.
The current only practical use of Einstein relativity (= which effect is usually negligibly small, so physically meaningless ) is said to be GPS time where stronger gravity makes clocks run more slowly in Einstein's wonderland ?
But there are many other realistic and powerful factors such as "atmospheric pressure" affecting very sensitive GPS atomic clocks than Einstein's fantasy time dilation.
"Atmospheric pressure" and other physical circumstances are completely different in areas causing different magnitude of gravitational force which is probably transmitted by some "medium". All these "circumstance" difference related to different gravitational area could naturally affect sensitive clock time slightly which could be misinterpreted as Einstein pseudo-physics.
So in order to decide whether GPS clock time error is caused by Einstein spooky time dilation or other more realistic factors such as different atmospheric and physical "circumstances" in different gravitational areas, we have to conduct some "differential diagnosis" to discriminate the right from wrong theories.
In fact, Einstein relativity includes serious self-contradiction in the paradoxical situation where moving clocks appear to run slower seen by stationary observer. Hence, "differential diagnosis" can simply tell us Einstein theory is false.
In two satellites orbiting around the earth in the opposite directions, the satellite A clock appears to be moving, hence, run slower seen by the other satellite B, and simultaneously, the satellite B clock appears to be moving, hence, run slower seen by the satellite A. ← Which satellite clock runs slower A or B is uncertain and paradoxical.
Differential diagnosis → The same physical phenomenon (= slight GPS clock time error ) can be explained by two different theories (= Einstein time dilation or atmospheric, circumstance difference ) → Only Einstein relativistic theory includes fatal paradox, so Einstein theory is false and excluded.
Conclusion → GPS clock time error is caused by other more realistic factors (= different atmospheric or medium pressure ) related to different gravitational area, Not caused by Einstein 'fairy-tale' theory.
So to dispove a theory, we need to simply find an "evidence against the theory" or expose some obvious "self-contradiction" accompanying such a pseudo-theory.
By this golden rule of providing a "counter-evidence" or "self-contradiction", we can disprove both quantum mechanics and Einstein relativistic theory here.
Einstein counter-intuitive relativistic theory began by dismissing "real medium" in space, so his theory argues the space is "completely empty", contains nothing !
In this "empty space", how can particles transmit actual "forces" such as electric or gravitational forces that can reach and affect distant objects ?
Surprisingly, Einstein theory says all forces are mediated by illusory virtual particles with nonphysical imaginary mass which contradicts Einstein mc2 relation ( this p.3 ). ← Einstein theory is "self-contradictory" in describing forces.
Forces such as electric and gravity cover almost all space = very large area, these forces can reach even very distant area from the source particle of forces. ← A electron (= source of elecric force ) always emits an incredibly large number of (unreal) virtual particles enough to cover all 'empty' space in all directions ? ← Unbelievable.
This poor electron would soon run out of stored virtual particles, all of which are emitted into 'empty' space ! ← No more electric force ? So the current theory gave up 'reality', and saying these virtual particles do Not really exist. ← "Forces" really exist, but their mediator = "virtual particles" do Not exist ? ← self-contradiction.
Light interference in two-slit experiment obviously proves the light is "wave" transmitted through some "medium" like sound and water waves.
Einstein's hypothetical photon (= a particle of light ? ) cannot explain why the light speed changes in different light "medium", which can be explained only by light wave theory (= Huygens ) in the same way as sound wave traveling through different medium.
There is No conclusive evidence that the light is a particle called "photon."
Physicists can never tell us "how big" and "what shape" a single photon is, though if the light is a particle, the light must have its definite shape and size. ← Einstein photon theory is self-contradictory in explaining the "photon's figure" and property.
Famous Einstein photoelectric effect just showed the energy of light is proportional to the "light frequency" (= reciprocal of wavelength, so this photoelectric effect demonstrates wave nature of light ! ), Not providing a single evidence of a particle nature of light.
The so-called "photon detector" just detects "electrons" ejected by light wave (= cannot directly detect a photon particle ) through photoelectric effect. ← still No evidence of a "photon particle".
Physicists just roughly interpret the "light wave" with enough energy to eject an electron from an atom as a fictitious particle photon, without revealing any concrete "figure" of a photon particle or detailed mechanism of how a photon "interacts" with an electron in photoelectric effect.
Radio wave is one of light wave with extremely long wavelength = 30000 meters. ← If this radio wave is also a "photon particle", this photon particle size must be unrealistically as big as 30000 meters ! ← No one has ever found such a big photon "particle".
Compton scattering just demonstrated the "light wavelength" (= wave nature of light ) changes, when the light loses energy being scattered by an electron. ← If the light is a photon particle, the photon's speed (= instead of light wavelength ) must be changed by losing energy in scattering.
But light speed is always constant c ( in the same medium ) regardless of the light energy or wavelength, which is another conclusive evidence that the light is "wave" traveling through medium like sound wave (= constant speed regardless of its wavelength ), Not a particle.
The current physical theory says a real electron cannot emit or absorb a real photon. ← So if an electron actually "absorbs" a photon particle in photoelectric effect, this photon must be "unreal virtual photon". ← Einstein's photon view contradicts "reality", again.
Particle's momentum (= p ) is defined as the product of the particle's mass (= m ) times its velocity (= v ), which means if the particle's mass is zero, its momentum must be always zero, too ( p = mv = 0, if m = 0 ).
But Einstein relativity blatantly defies this basic physical law, and claims a photon has No mass, but has its momentum. ← Einstein contradicts the original definition of "momentum".
The fact that light wave has momentum was first proved by Maxwell's classical electromagnetic wave theory without photons. Later, Einstein copied Maxwell wave theory as a wrong, modified version introducing a fictitious photon particle.
Einstein famous energy relation mc2 was demonstrated using "nuclear energy" which is a kind of potential energy (= Not particle's relativistic kinetic energy proposed by Einstein original mc2 ).
"Potential energy or forces" caused around particles needs the existence of some "real medium" affecting distant particles and mass, so nuclear potential energy (= as big as mc2 ) stored in the "surrounding medium" around particles contradicts Einstein relativistic theory dismissing medium.
Relativistic quantum field theory incorporating Einstein theory describes "nuclear strong force" as exchange of "nonphysical virtual gluons" (= one of unreal virtual particles ) between imaginary fractional-charge quarks, without showing any more detailed mechanism of how virtual gluons touch or interacts with particles.
This nuclear potential energy stored in "medium" around particles was also first proposed by Maxwell's classical electromagnetic wave theory, and later Einstein copied and modified the original Maxwell's mc2 theory in the wrong way ( realistic light wave in Maxwell → unreal virtual particles in Einstein ).
Einstein theory needs fictitious virtual photons with unreal imaginary mass to explain all forces and their potential energies such as nuclear and Coulomb. ← Einstein relativistic theory defies "reality", again.
In photoelectric effect, an electron can never emit or absorb a real photon, because the ratio of energy to momentum is completely different between a lighter photon and a heavier electron.
Both total energy and momentum must be always conserved.
When an electron absorbs a photon with the energy E, the electron also absorbs the photon's momentum p according to conservation law.
But the ratio (= E/p ) of energy E to momentum p possessed by each particle is different between a photon and an electron, indicating an electron cannot absorb the same amount of both energy and momentum of a photon simultaneously. ← Conserving both total energy and momentum between an electron and a photon is impossible.
So if an electron can absorb a photon, conserving both total energy and momentum, this photon must be always unreal virtual photon having imaginary mass (= virtual photon mass squared m2 < 0 ).
Therefore, virtual particles purported to be a mediator of all forces contradicts the most important and basic physical law (= conservation of energy and momentum ) taught in schools !
To avoid these unreal virtual photons, an electron must emit ( or absorb ) energy through some "friction" against the medium, which already exists around the electron, instead of a electron itself emitting ( or absorbing ) new imaginary virtual photons from the electron's inside into the empty vacuum.
When an moving electron (= de Broglie wave ) crashes into the medium around the electron and loses its kinetic energy, the electromagnetic wave is generated and pushed out in the direction perpendicular to the initial electron's moving direction.
This newly-generated electromagnetic light wave stores the kinetic energy the electon lost by crashing against the surrounding medium in the transverse direction (= parallel to the electron's moving direction ) as "oscillating energy" and the light momentum detected by Compton scattering is expressed in the longitudinal direction (= in which the light travels being pushed out, perpendicular to the electron's moving direction ).
This realistic light wave model generated by "crash" between an electron and the already-existing surrounding medium includes No self-contradiction as to energy and momentum conservation law, and of course, does Not need to rely on unreal virtual photon with imaginary mass accompanying Einstein relativistic theory.
Even a single particle such as an electron is known to interfere with itself in two-slit experiment.
If Einstein was right and the space is empty except a single electron, the electron must unrealistically split into "multiple parallel universes" and pass through two slits simultaneously for a single particle to interfere with itself.
If the space contains real "medium", it can naturally and realistically explain two-slit experiment where an single electron causes de Broglie wave around it, which wave interferes with itself and affects the motion of an electron which just passes through only one slit without splitting into fantasy parallel worlds.
The Earth is spinning very fast, but all things on the earth such as humans and atmosphere rotate at exactly the "same velocity" as the earth, so we don't feel the "wind caused by the earth rotation" which could easily blow us away.
If there was only "gravitational force defined by Einstein" pulling us towards the earth's center in the vertical direction ( without any 'medium' dragging us in the horizontal direction ), we and atmosphere would be rotating at completely different speeds from the spinning earth in the horizontal direction, and it could always cause strong 'earth wind' against us, but such a strange wind does Not happen.
It means all things on the earth are being "dragged" by some 'medium' (= moving with the earth, hence, this dragged "medium" can explain constant light speed shown in Michelson-Morley experiment ) in the same horizontal direction as the earth rotation.
Einstein's unrealistically 'empty' space cannot explain actual phenomena where all things on the earth are always being 'dragged' by the spinning earth in same horizontal direction.
Hypothetical dark matter is said to interact only with gravity. But if the gravity is the only driving force, the dark matter objects would show exactly the same "Keplerian motion" as solar system (= dark matter would attract each other through gravity, forming "dark matter stars orbiting around other dark matter stars" like solar system, if dark matter is governed by "gravity" ).
But galaxy rotation is completely different from Keplerian motion caused by ordinary gravity, indicating "dark matter" is also a kind of "medium" filling space, dragging all stars at the same speed in the same horizontal direction in galaxy rotation.
In fact, the physical reason for all observed "atomic quantized energy levels" also needs the existence of "real medium".
In all atoms and molecules, the sum of electron's kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy is the total energy, which must be always conserved and constant, wherever the electron is inside the atomic wavefunction.
For this atomic total energy to be determined as the single definite value (= each atom and molecule has its unique definite ground state (= lowest ) energy. ex. hydrogen atom's lowest total energy is always -13.6 eV ), the average distance (= orbital radius ) between the electron and nucleus must take a definite and constant value.
If there is only Coulomb electric force influencing these atomic energy levels, an negatively-charged electron would be easily attracted and falling into a positively- charged nuclues unlimitedly, quickly shrinking the electron's orbital radius and lowering its total energy unlimitedly (= atomic lowest total energy can go down and down to minus infinity ! )
But such a strange thing does Not happen. Hydrogen atomic lowest energy cannot be lower than -13.6 eV, by keeping the definite "distance" between an electron and a nucleus against Coulomb attraction between them.
So there must be some other 'external factors' or physical things which constantly keep an electron from falling into a nucleus against their Coulomb attraction. ← If the space contains nothing as Einstein says, there's "nothing" to keep electrons from falling into nucleus in "empty" space. ← self-contradiction, again !
Classical Bohr atomic model successfully explained the experimental results of hydrogen-like atomic energy levels, gave exactly the same results as Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics.
Because both quantum mechanics and Bohr model use exactly the same physical principle of "Coulomb potential energy" and "de Broglie wave theory".
The electron's de Broglie wave was experimentally confirmed and its de Broglie wavelength is known to be inversely proportional to the electron's momentum or kinetic energy.
When the electron's orbital length is "an integer times de Broglie wavelength" (= related to electron's kinetic energy ), the total energy values and the electron's average orbital radius can be determined as definite values specific to each atom.
Schrödinger's equation of quantum mechanics 'tacitly' uses the same condition (= orbital length is an integer times de Broglie wavelength ) as Bohr's orbit, which is why both Schrödinger's and Bohr's atomic models give exactly the same definite energy values in all hydrogen-like atoms.
When the orbital length is an integer times de Broglie wavelength, it does Not cause "destructive interference" of electron's de Broglie wave, making the electron's motion stable.
What causes "destructive interference" of electron's de Broglie wave to decide whether or not to kick out the electron from the orbit ? ← If the space contains nothing except for an electron and nucleus, there is 'nothing else' to push out the electron by destructive interference.
So Einstein's "empty space" cannot explain the determination of atomic energy levels which needs some other external factors causing destructive interference of electron's de Broglie wave.
This source of de Broglie wave interference affecting the electron's motion or determining its orbital radius (= hence, energy levels ) is some "medium", which Einstein relativity illegitimately ditched 100 years ago.
Quantum mechanical hydrogen atom always includes unreal "zero orbital angular momentum", meaning an electron always crashes into a nucleus and its linear orbital motion (= due to zero angular momentum ) always causes destructive interference of electron's de Broglie wave, making the electron's motion unstable. ← Quantum mechanical atomic model is unstable and contradictory to actual stable atoms, so false.
Textbooks often mention unphysical "uncertainty principle" as a reason why an electron doesn't fall into a nucleus, without showing any detailed underlying physical mechanism keeping an electron from falling into a nucleus. "Uncertain principle" just means some "uncertain state" literally, Not specifying any physical objects at all.
So quantum mechanics deliberately avoids finding some "realistic physical objects" which actually keep an electron from falling into a nucleus against Coulomb attraction between an electron and a nucleus.
Quantum mechanics determines hydrogen's energy values by "solving Schrödinger equation" which consists of an electron's kinetic (= expressed as de Broglie wavelength ) and Coulomb potential energy.
But Schrödinger equations of any other multi-electron atoms or molecules cannot be solved. It means quantum mechanics has No way to determine the definite evergy values in multi-electron atoms or molecules. ← Quantum mechanics is useless and inconsistent with actual physical phenomena.
Schrödinger equation often chooses fake approximate solution consisting of hydrogen atomic wavefunctions with freely adjustable parameters in unsolvable multi-electron atoms. ← Choosing arbitrary fake solution means quantum mechanics is just an "art" rather than "science", hence this unscientific quantum mechanics cannot predict any physical values.
Quantum mechanical unphysical wavefunction is said to mean a vaguely-spreading "electron cloud" showing artificially-introduced concept = ad-hoc "probability" of finding an electron in various places.
Different from Bohr's realistic atomic model which clearly separates an "electron particle" from "de Broglie wave "generated in the medium surrounding the electron, Schrödinger wavefunction just roughly "mixes up" electron's particle and de Broglie wave as one nonphysical, indistinguishable wavefunction.
The probability of finding an electron in any position represented by Schrödinger wavefunction's amplitude is Not zero, which means a single electron must alwasys exist everywhere all over the space simultaneously using parallel worlds in a wacky quantum mechanical atom.
This electron "cloud" jumbling up a particle and wave picture of quantum mechanics poses serious problems especially in multi-electron atoms.
Because two electrons's clouds (= always spreading all over place ) cannot avoid each other even if electrons constantly try to repel each other by Coulomb repulsion between electrons (= so Coulomb force is Not normally working in strange quantum mechanics ).
In realistic atomic model (= ③ and ④ in the upper figure ), two electrons (= localized point-like particles ) can be always moving into some particular places so that those electrons can clearly avoid other electrons (= so these "real" moving electrons can always keep 'definite distance' between two repulsive electrons ).
Keeping some 'definite distance' between electrons by particle-like electrons constantly moving and avoiding each other means this realistic atomic model can keep the definite Coulomb potential energy, hence, conserve total energy even in multi-electron atoms.
Unfortunately, calculating these realistic electrons constantly moving and avoiding by Coulomb forces between moving particles needs modern computers (= because this calculation is complicated three-body problem ), which did Not exist in 1920s when physicists had No choice but to accept unrealistic quantum mechanics.
This realistic atomic model where two negative electrons can move, approach the other positive nuclei, avoiding other nagative electrons can generate powerful Coulomb attractive force between atoms enough to form stable molecular bonds. ← physically consistent theory
But in quantum mechanical atom, each electron must always exist everywhere simultaneously (= defined by electron uncanny "probability" cloud spreading all space ), so two electrons can ignore Coulomb repulsive force, approach (= ② ) and move far away (= ① ) from each other at the same time using parallel worlds, like a ghost.
So in a quantum mechanical hydrogen (= H2 ) molecule, the distance between two electrons can take any "random and arbitrary value" (= Not determined as the definite value, hence, Coulomb repulsive energy between two electrons can take any random and arbitrary values, too ). ← Total energy of the quantum mechanical atom or molecule is Not determined or conserved as the single definite value.
Therefore, quantum mechanical atom or molecule violating total energy conservation law is self-contradictory and false.
As I said, for atomic energy to be determined as the definite value, at least two conditions governng electron's motion are necessary. = The first condition is total energy (= kinetic + Coulomb potential energies ) is conserved. The second condition is the orbital length is an interger times de Broglie wavelength (= which determines electron's kinetic energy ).
In multi-electron atoms, one more condition is necessary to determine energy values. This third condition is the "distance between repulsive electrons", which determines "effective central charge Z" (= the sum of positive charge of an nucleus and negative charges of other electorons. ).
This positive central effective charge Z increases ( or decreases ) when the distance between two repulsive electron is longer ( or shorter ).
In unrealistic quantum mechanical atoms or molecule, the distance between two electrons can take random and arbitrary values due to vaguely-spreading electron cloud, so this central effective positive charge Z cannot be determined as the definite value. → Total energy cannot be conserved or determined as the definite value.
So the multi-electron atom's energy value can be determined by three conditions: the central positive charge Z + an electron moving around the central positive charge in the orbit whose orbital length is an interger times de Broglie wavelength + the total energy is always conserved wherever electrons are inside an atom as the definite value.
As I said, in the quantum mechanical cloud, each electron can always exist everywhere limitlessly inside an atom or a molecule. ← The distance between two electrons can be randomly changeable and arbitrary (= hence, Coulomb repulstive energy between two electrons is uncertain an arbitrary, too ). → No energy conservation, so false theory.
For two electrons to be avoiding each other, each electron must be "particle-like" moving localized in the definite position, which requires the spreading probability wavefunction to shrink and be sharper, localized only in one particular place, but its sharper wavefunction (= shorter de Broglie wavelength ) drastically increases electron's kinetic energy.
If an "electron cloud" tries to be localized in one particular place → quantum probability wavefunction becomes sharper and narrower only in the electron's place. → de Broglie wavelength gets unrealistically shorter. →Electron's kinetic energy becomes drastically higher. →Total energy becomes mugh higher than experimentally confirmed lowest (= ground-state ) energy value. ← This theory is wrong. → An electron cannot move or get localized in one particular place in quantum mechanical "probability" electron cloud.
So a quantum mechanical electron can never be localized only in one place, as long as the electron is expressed as nonphysical "probability" wavefunction mixing up a particle and wave picture.
In quantum mechanical wavefunction which cannot separate an electron particle from de Broglie wave, each electron must always spread all over place as an unrealistic electron cloud, making it impossible to conserve total energy by allowing each electron to exist everywhere simultaneously.
This quantum mechanical electron cloud where a electron cannot move to one particular place (= cannot approach the other nucleus ) as a particle, cannot generate powerful Coulomb attraction enough to form molecular bond.
Therefore, quantum mechanics has to rely on "dirty tricks" of lowering kinetic energy illegitimately, even by deliberately violating total energy conservation law to generate fake molecular bond energy.
As a result, Einstein ad-hoc relativistic theory rejecting "real medium" 100 years ago and colluding with parallel-world quantum mechanics spawned many "irreparable self-contradictions", demonstrating all these so-called mainstream theories are physically false.
See this week physics is still useless.
(M-1) ↓ Each electron exists in two atoms in ?
Coulomb electric force is the most important and influential force playing a major role in binding atoms and all biological reactions.
Coulomb electric force is the only source of "potential energy" or attraction between particles, which forms atomic or molecular bonds also in quantum mechanics.
But in fact, surprisingly, unrealistic quantum mechanics can Not use this Coulomb force (= the only contributor to attraction and potential energy ) in forming molecular bond joining two atoms together !
Strictly speaking, quantum mechanics can Not use any real "forces" inside atoms or molecules.
This means quantum mechanics is wrong and useless as atomic tool due to lack of concept of "force" between atoms.
This is why the current "scientists" are obsessed only with "literature" selling "sci-fi" books, changing their pseudo-science, education, universities into a mere "political tool" indoctrinating students with illusion irrelevant to actual science.
Is this failed quantum "science" related to dangerous academia pulling strings behind cracking down on social media using uncanny "extra-dimensional" power ?
Many experiments showed each electron is really a "negatively-charged particle" with definite mass moved by Coulomb electric force.
At the same time, many experiments showed each electron behaves like "de Broglie wave" causing interference like classical sound wave. The electron's wavelength proved to be inversely proportional to the electron's momentum or kinetic energy.
A "particle" and "wave are completely different things with different shapes and properties, which are incompatible with each other.
Quantum mechanics has endured this self-contradiction for a long time, claiming each electron or light can be a particle and wave at the same time, without showing concrete underlying mechanism, so it's a dead theory.
Quantum mechanics has been haunted by illusory idea that each electron or a particle can pass through two slits at once using fantasy parallel universes, causing interference.
The only realistic and possible intepretation of two slit experiment of a single electron is that an electron is an "actually-moving particle" that can pass through only one slit at once, generating de Broglie wave around it, which pushes the electron, causing interference.
But this realistic atomic model based on a real moving electron (= particle ) and real de Broglie wave faced complicated three-body problem in multi-electron atoms where several electrons are moving, pushing each other real-time which calculation needed modern computers which did Not exist in 1920s when physicists had no choice but to accept unrealistic quantum mechanics.
Quantum mechanics abandoned the notion that an electron is a real particle, instead, expresses each electron as vague electron cloud spreading all over space in the form of unphysical wavefuncton.
Each electron's position and velocity are completely unknown using notorious uncertainty principle as an excuse, meaning each electron can exist in multiple different places at once using quantum mechanical parallel worlds.
Strangely, still Nobody understands the deeper physical mechanism behind this uncanny quantum mechanical world, even after 100 years have passed since its foundation.
Unphysical electron cloud model of quantum mechanics works only in the simplest one-electron hydrogen atom, because hydrogen's Schrödinger equation is the only atomic equation which is solvable, hence it has the exact solution.
Schrödinger equation = very old but the only calculation tool of the current quantum mechanics is unsolvable (= No exact solution ) in any multi-electron atoms or molecules.
Hence, quantum mechanics can just approximately choose "fake solution" called basis set or trial wavefunction, which ad-hoc method is just "art" rather than "science".
And its unphysical wavefunction came to be used as "probability density" of finding an electron in various places with No scientific basis.
This unphysical quantum mechanical wavefunction forcibly interpreted as "probability wavefunction" of an electron poses serious, irreparable problems especially in molecular bond energy.
When two atoms approach each other and form molecular bond between them, the only source of attractive force binding two atoms is Coulomb electric force between negatively-charged electrons and positively-charged nuclei.
So in a diatomic molecule consisting of two atoms
But quantum mechanical "electron cloud" spreading thinly and symmetrically around the nucleus can neither approach the other nucleus nor avoid other electrons. ← cannot generate Coulomb attraction between atoms
Because this whole fuzzy "electron cloud" cannot shrink into only one place or transform into a point-like charged particle that could easily approach or avoid other charged particles.
So quantum mechanical "electron cloud" can Not use Coulomb attractive force between electrons and nuclei (= "electron cloud" cannot approach the other nucleus or avoid other electrons, like a point-like moving electron ) as the source of molecular binding energy !
This serious problem is due to spooky "wave-particle duality" where all quantum mechanics can do is express each electron Not as a moving point-like particle but as a "vaguely spreading wavefunction" = probability density of finding an electron without specifying the electron's exact position or localizing the electron in one place.
So when quantum mechanics tries to express an electron as a point-like "particle" moving to the left ( or right ) side of the nucleus (= localizing an electron only in one place around the nucleus in order to approach positive nuclei, avoiding other negative electrons ), the electron's probability wavefunction spreading all over space must shrink and become narrower, sharper and localized only in the place of the point-like electron.
Narrower and "sharper probability wavefunction" is equal to "shorter de Broglie wavelength ( which means higher kinetic energy )" in Schrödinger equation.
Hence, the localized electron → narrower probability wavefuncton → shorter de Broglie wavelength extremely increases electron's kinetic energy which heightens the total energy, cancels lowered Coulomb energy and makes it impossible to form molecular bond.
So if an electron (= spreading cloud or wavefunction in quantum mechanics ) tries to move and be localized to the particular place to approach the other nucleus, avoid other electrons and lower Coulomb potential energy,
→ Probability of finding an electron only in the "particular place" around the nucleus needs to be higher. → Probability wavefunction needs to be sharper and narrower only in that electron's place. → de Broglie wavelength becomes shorter → Electron's kinetic energy becomes extremely higher. → Total energy becomes higher → lowered Coulomb potential energy is canceled. →Molecular bond energy is Not formed in quantum mechanics.
On the other hand, in realistic atomic model separating an electron particle from de Broglie wave around it, the electron can easily move and be localized only in one place with No problem (= without increasing kinetic energy ).
Because "real de Broglie wave" separated from an "electron particle" has nothing to do with quantum mechanical ad-hoc interpretation of wavefunction as unphysical "probability" of finding an electron.
So the real electron (= distinguished from de Broglie wave ) can be easily localized only in the particular place without sharpening de Broglie wave or increasing its kinetic energy, different from quantum mechanics which needs narrowing "probability wavefunction (→ increase kinetic energy )" to localize an electron in the particular place.
So quantum mechanical electron cloud must always spread all over the place (= instead of being localized only in the particular place ) to prevent increasing the electron's kinetic energy, and be distributed symmetrically around the nucleus.
This quantum electron cloud cannot approach the other nucleus or avoid other electrons to generate Coulomb attractive force, hence, molecular bond energy caused by Coulomb force is impossible in quantum mechanics.
Quantum mechanical electron cloud is similar to "spherical electron's charge" distributed evenly around the nucleus, which can be treated like a negative charge in exactly the same place as the central nucleus = the net charge of this electron overlapping with nucleus in the same place becomes almost zero, which cannot generate any Coulomb attraction to form molecular bond.
So quantum mechanics cannot use orthodox idea that Coulomb attraction between electrons and nuclei of two atoms is the main source of molecular bond. Lowering Coulomb potential energy → loweres total energies → form molecular bond is impossible in quantum mechanics.
Instead, quantum mechanics has to use some "dirty trick" of lowering the electron's kinetic energy ( instead of lowering orthodox Coulomb potential energy ) illegitimately as the source of (fake) moelcular bond energy, which violates total energy conservation, so false.
For example, in hydrogen (= H2 ) molecule consisting of two hydrogen atoms ( = electron-1 and nucleus-1 in hydrogen atom-1, electron-2 and nucleus-2 in hydrogen atom-2 ), quantum mechanics approximately chooses two hydrogen atomic wavefunctions as fake solution of H2 molecule.
The sum of an electron's kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy between the electron and nucleus is the total energy, which must be conserved and constant wherever an electron is inside the atomic wavefunction, if this wavefunction is the true solvable solution (= which corresponds only to one-electron hydrogen atom ).
Quantum mechanics uses the combination of solvable hydrogen atomic wavefunctons as an approximate (= fake ) solution of larger molecule, so the total energy only inside each hydrogen atomic wavefunction is conserved (= the total energy between electron-1 and nucleus-1 inside the same hydrogen atom-1 is conserved, but the energy between different atoms like electron-1 of hydrogen atom-1 and nucleus-2 of hydrogen atom-2 is Not conserved or constant ).
As the electron-1 is moving farther away from the original nucleus-1 inside hydrogen atom-1 against Coulomb attraction (= Coulomb potential energy between electron-1 and nucleus-1 is higher ), the electron-1 kinetic energy becomes lower to conserve total energy.
As a result, the total energy (= only inside hydrogen atom-1 ) remains conserved and constant = higher Coulomb potential energy between electron-1 and nucleus-1 + lower electron-1's kinetic energy, as the electron-1 is farther away from the nucleus-1.
But when the electron-1 moves farther away from nucleus-1, the electron-1 approaches the other nucleus-2, hence it lowers the total Coulomb potential energy due to stronger Coulomb attraction between the electron-1 and nucleus-2.
But in this fake H2 solution consisting of two hydrogen atomic wavefunctions, the electron-1's kinetic energy (= given by hydrogen-1 atomic wavefunction ) keeps lower even when the electron-1 approaches nucleus-2 (= electron-1 is farther away from nucleus-1 ), lowering total Coulomb potential energy.
So lowered Coulomb potential energy between electron-1 and nucleus-2 + lowered electron-1's kinetic energy by moving farther away from nucleus-1 = lowered total energy is No longer conserved or constant.
This illegitimately lowered kinetic energy of the electron-1 ( or electron-2 ) near the other nucleus-2 ( or nucleus-1 ) between two different atoms is the source of fake molecular bond energy of quantum mechanics. ← This sneaky trick intentionally exploits "violation of total energy conservation", so scientifically invalid.
There is still a problem in quantum mechanical electron's "probability cloud" model, which is Not enough to generate actual molecular bond energy just by lowering kinetic energy of the electron near the other nucleus of the other atom in an illegitimate way.
Think about when the electron-1 approaches the other nucleus-2 (= lowering both kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy of the electron-1 → lower total energy → slightly causes (fake) molecular bond energy ).
The electron-1's probability density near the nucleus-2 (= lower kinetic energy area ) is much lower than the electron-1's probability density near the original nucleus-1 (= higher kinetic energy area ).
So the probability of electron having lower kinetic energy is still Not high enough to cause molecular bond energy.
In order to expand the probability density area of the electron-1 with lowered kinetic energy near the nucleus-2 intentionally, quantum mechanics uses nonphysical trick called overlap ( or exchange ) integral.
To generate this quantum mechanical unphysical overlap (= exchange ) energy ( or integral ), each electron must unrealistically exist both in atom-1 and atom-2 at the same time using fantasy parallel worlds.
It means the electron-1 of H2 molecule must have two different hydrogen atomic wavefunctions (= φa (e1) around nucleus-1 and φb (e1) around nucleus-2 ) at the same time ( this p.14 ). = Each electron can exist in two different atoms simultaneously in a diatomic molecule !
Quantum mechanics adopts strange, unphysical rule that all electrons are "indistinguishable", so two electrons belonging to two different atoms ( or nuclei ) are indistinguishable, too.
This indistinguishable electrons even between different atoms pose serious problems which make it impossible for quantum mechanics to calculate (Coulomb) forces between two different atoms.
When we want to know the Coulomb force between an electron of Na atom and electrons of Cl atom, and compare it to other Coulomb force between the Na electron and other atomic electrons to predict in which direction this Na electron will be pulled by other charged particles, we have to distinguish Na atomic electrons from Cl or other atomic electrons in different places.
But according to unrealistic quantum mechanical rule, any electrons belonging to different atoms or places are indistinguishable (= hence, an electron specific to Na, Cl or other atoms does Not exist. Every electron must always exist in all different atoms or places such as Na, Cl and other atoms simultaneously ! )
So as long as we rely on quantum mechanical strange rule (= any two electrons are indistinguishable irrelevant to whether they belong to different atoms or not, and must exist in multiple different atoms simultaneously using parallel worlds ), we can Not calculate Coulomb forces of electrons ( or nuclei ) between different distinguishable atoms.
We can Not predict any chemical or biological reactions under this strange quantum mechanics, because we cannot know in which direction each electron is pulled or pushed by other charged particles which are all indistinguishable, existing everywhere with No specific location (= Coulomb forces in different places and directions are all indistinguishable, so these "ghost-like" forces cannot be calculated ).
According to artificial Pauli exclusion principle rule of quantum mechanics, when the labels of any two electrons (= ex. electrons e1 and e2 ) are exchanged ( e1 ↔ e2 ), the total wavefunction must flip its sign ( ψ(e1, e2) = - ψ(e2, e1) ). ← This ad-hoc rule has nothing to do with reality, just unphysical, empty rule.
So if two wavefunctions of electrons 1 and 2 are the same ( φa = φb ), the total wavefunction becomes zero. ← Any two wavefunctions (= any two electrons' states ) must be different. ← Pauli principle = any two electrons cannot occupy the same state (= wavefunction, this p.6 ) ?
Under this artificial quantum mechanical Pauli principle rule, any two electrons are "indistinguishable", whether those two electrons belong to different atoms or not. Any total wavefunction must be "anti-symmetric" including unreal "spin" ( this p.4 ).
Therefore, the case where an electron-1 exists only in atom-1 and an electron-2 exists only in atom-2 is impossible in a quantum mechanical molecule.
An electron-1 ( or electron-2 ) must always exist in two different atoms-1 and atom-2 simultaneously with the same probability using fictional parallel worlds.
H2 molecule wavefunction must always include H atom-1 wavefunction possessing electron-1 (= φa(e1) ) and H atom-2 wavefunction possessing electron-1 (= φb(e1), this p.27 ) at the same time.
In the same way, the H2 molecule wavefunction must include H atom-1 wavefunction with electron-2 (= φa(e2) ) and H atom-2 wavefunction with electron-2 (= φb(e2) ) at the same time.
When we choose this artificial wavefunction where two electrons are indistinguishable as a molecule's fake solution and integrate it, we can obtain (fake) molecular total energy including Coulomb energy (= integral ) and unphysical "overlap exchange energy (= integral )".
This unphysical "exchange integral" is exploited to obtain fake molecular bond energy by artificially expand the electron's probability area with illegitimately lowered kinetic energy near the other nucleus.
Coulomb energy term (= integral ) includes the ordinary electron's probability (= the product of two same wavefunctions such as φa(e1)φa(e1) and φb(e2)φb(e2) ).
Exchange energy term (= integral ) is unrealistic, cannot be described by any real physical objects (= the product of the different wavefunctions like φb(e1)φa(e1) or φa(e2)φb(e2) ).
This unphysical "exchange energy" (= Not Coulomb energy ) which lowers electron's kinetic energy illegitimately by violating total energy conservation law is the main source of fake molecular bond energy in quantum mechanics ( this p.3, this p.15-16, this p.4 figure.1 ).
Hence, quantum mechanics can neither express real Coulomb force (= which is too weak to form molecular bond between electron's spreading clouds which have to rely on unphysical "exchange energy" ) nor distinguish two different electrons of two different atoms.
These "ghost-like" indistinguishable electrons designated by strange quantum mechanical rule which cannot generate even real Coulomb force are completely useless as basic physical tool for using atomic or electronic bahavior in applied science such as biology and medicine.
By flipping the sign and changing this "exchange attractive energy causing fake molecular bond" into "exchange repulsion", it becomes Pauli exclusion repulsion, which is strangely Not admitted to be a true force, lacking force carrier. No physical interpretation is given to this unphysical, uncanny exchange energy ( this p.6 ), which disagrees with experimental facts, hence, useless in practical science.
Due to these unrealistically indistinguishable electrons of quantum mechanics, all the current condensed matter physics has to rely on bogus one-electron (= indistinguishable ) approximation = density functional theory (= DFT ) where the whole many-electron material is treated like one big fictitious, indistinguishable pseudo-electron ( this p.3 ).
Humans already have useful technology of distinguishing and manipulating each different atoms one by one using atomic force microscope.
But unphysical quantum mechanical rule where any atoms or electrons are indistinguishable forbids physicists from distinguishing individual different atoms for applying atomic interaction in sophisticated nano-technology.
Hence, concept of "real" Coulomb force or Pauli exclusion force between different atoms or electrons is Not allowed in quantum mechanics, even after we can actually measure thoses forces precisely by atomic force microspoce. ← self-contradiction. Science stops progressing.
So even when physicists want to move an electron from atom-1 to atom-2 using some nano-device, strangely, they are Not allowed to distinguish those clearly different electrons belonging to three different atoms (= atom-1, atom-2 and nano-device ). ← No reality in atomic world.
Therefore, any different electrons belonging to atom-1, atom-2 and nano-device must always be mixed as "one indistinguishable pseudo-electron", using one-pseudo-electron approximation = DFT ( this p.2, this p.6 ) in quantum mechanics.
We have to give up calculating forces between those indistinguishable "ghost-like" atoms mixed up as one pseudo-electron, even when we can detect different individual atoms or electrons as actually-dinstinguishable (= differently movable in different directions ) objects, and measure "forces" such as Coulomb, Pauli and van der Waarls forces.
As long as we rely on quantum mechanics, we can neither distinguish each electron belonging to different atoms nor use real forces. ← One pseudo-electron and unreal quasiparticle appoximation always have to be used to interpret the measured atomic forces or energy.
Applying these quantum mechanical ghost-like electrons and atoms which can exist in different places at once using parallel worlds to actual nano-technology or medicine is impossible forever.
So the first thing for us to do is replace unrealistic quantum mechanics by some real atomic model where electrons are actually "moving particles" avoiding each other, and its de Broglie wave caused around the electron is distinguishable from an electron particle.
In this realistic atomic model, electrons can easily approach other nuclei, avoiding other electrons with No troubles, causing real powerful Coulomb force enough to generate real molecular bond. = This real atomic model does Not need to use unphysical "exchange energy" between uncanny "indistinguishable electrons or parallel worlds.
Destructive interference of electron's de Broglie wave allows us to estimate each electron's orbital radius (= which information is necessary to calculate actual forces between atoms, electrons ), and admit Pauli exclusion repulsion as "real physical force" with force carrier.
And this real atomic model will surely free us from the current quantum mechanical annoying, unreal concepts such as virtual particles, parallel worlds and fantasy cosmology.
See this week physics is still useless.
(Q-1) ↓ Dirty trick used in H2 molecule of
Quantum mechanics is mind-bogglingly weird and unrealistic.
Quantum mechanics says an electron can exist in multiple different places simultaneously, using the mythcal "power" of parallel universes like a ghost.
Uncanny quantum mechanics stops treating molecules, solids and proteins as real physical objects, instead, it made up fictitious model based on unreal quasi-particles with fake mass to explain various physical phenomena involving many-body effects.
There is No point in distinguishing individual particles existing in different places according to weird quantum mechanics which claims each particle can pass through two slits at once using parallel worlds.
So physicists started to treat the whole many-electron material consisting of many different atoms as "one big fictitious pseudo-electron with fake (= effective ) mass" using bogus one-electron approximation called density functional theory (= DFT this p.3 ).
This unjustifiable quantum mechanical method giving up distinguishing different electrons as if the entire material with many electrons were "one indistinguishable pseudo-electron" poses serious problems especially in applied science manipulating many differently-moving electrons.
The current medicine still pins its hope on very old technique "vaccine" as the only way left for us to contain viruses. But recent studies showing "rapidly-vanishing immunity after coronavirus infection seem to doom our last hope = vaccine.
We have to find effective drugs for deadly viruses by precisely understanding molecular interactions of viral infection in order to block their invasion at the "atomic level".
But the current only atomic theory = unrealistic quantum mechanics forbids us from distinguishing electrons in different places such as a virus, a human cell and a drug molecular atoms, all of which are said to be like a ghost existing in every place at once using quantum parallel worlds.
Hence, the entire many-electron material must be treated like one big fictitious pseudo-electron or quasiparticle under the current only atomic theory = quantum mechanics.
So as long as we use this fictional quantum mechanical world as a basic tool to understand underlying complicated atomic mechanism, curing deadly diseases and developing useful nano-technology utilizing atomic interaction are impossible forever.
Physicists gave up practical use of their pseudo-science, instead, they focus only on selling "sci-fi" books or politics where arrogant academia judges "democracy" depending on whether politicians can give taxpayers' money to their fake science = extradimensions.
In coronavirus pandemic, finding new futuristic jobs and developing "dreamlike" technology will be extremely difficult, as long as our basic physics makes No progress stuck in fictional science.
Unfortunately, the current old-fashioned, obsolete school system (= spreader of viruses ) indoctrinating students with fake science seems to be the first thing that should be replaced by other new jobs.
In fact, quantum mechanics is doomed to fail in all applied science, whatever it tries in vain, as long as its basic unrealistic principle is unchanged.
Quantum mechanics cannot show the concrete shape or position of each electron, instead, it just shows unphysical wavefunction where each electron is supposed to spread as vague "probability" electron cloud obscuring its location.
This unrealistic electron cloud thinly spreading "symmetrically" around a nucleus has No problem only in one-electron hydrogen atom.
In a hydrogen (= H2 ) molecule consisting of two hydrogen atoms with two electrons, each electron needs to be distributed around each nucleus "unsymmetrically" (= contrary to quantum mechanical wavefunction ) to join two hydrogen atoms together by Coulomb attraction between electrons and nuclei.
For the H2 molecular bond to be formed, a negatively charged electron must move to "one side" of the original nucleus (= unsymmetrically ), approach the other positively-charged nucleus, avoiding the other electron which must step aside to the opposite side of the nucleus, obeying Coulomb electric force.
The Coulomb attraction between a negative electron and a positive nucleus lowers potential energy, and this "lower Coulomb potential energy" is the generator of stable molecular bond energy binding two atoms tightly in normal molecules.
But an electron cloud which always spreads all over space can neither avoid the other electron cloud nor approach the other nucleus, because the electron cloud cannot move to one side of a nucleus, hence 'real' molecular bond based on Coulomb attraction is impossible in quantum mechancs.
But to generate "molecular bond energy", "lowering total energy" somehow is indispensable, whether Coulomb attraction is mainly involved in molecular bond or not. Quantum mechanics which cannot use Coulomb attraction as a binding energy source has to rely on other unscientific dirty tricks.
First of all, why cannot quantum mechanical electron cloud move to the left or right side of an nucleus ? = Why cannot quantum electron cloud be localized unsymmetrically to either side of a nucleus (= an electron cloud cannot approach the other nucleus or avoid the other electron cloud, different from a point-like electron ) to lower Coulomb potential energy ?
Quantum mechanical cloud (= wavefunction ) cannot distinguish between a particle and wave, so an electron must be treated as a mere vague "wavefunction" which always spreads all over the place.
In order to confine and localize an electron to one place (= left or right side of a nucleus ), the probablity of finding an electron in that place must be extremely higher than any other places
The higher electron's probability wavefunction only in one side or one place means the probability wavefunction must be narrower and sharper, the electron's de Broglie wavelength (= the same thing as probability wavefunction ) must be much shorter (= electron momentum and kinetic energy become higher ) only in that place.
"Extremely short de Broglie wavelength" due to narrower probability wavefunction in order to confine an electron only to one specific location drastically increases the electron's momentum or kinetic energy.
"Extremely higher kinetic energy" caused by sharper electron's wavefunction (= shorter de Broglie wavelength ) localizing an electron cloud in one place leads to extremely higher total energy which nullifies lowered Coulomb potential energy between localized electron cloud and nuclei.
Therefore, real molecular bond caused by Coulomb attractive energy between a negative localized electron and positive nucleus is impossible in quantum mechanical electron cloud model which cannot move or be localized to one side of a nucleus ( which needs "sharper" probability wavefunction in one side of a nucleus, hence, it drastically heighten electron's kinetic energy ) to approach the other nucleus, avoiding the other electron.
But in order to form stable molecular bond, they have to lower the molecular total energy somehow. If Coulomb attraction (= lowering Coulomb potential energy → lower total energy ) is impossible in quantum mechanics, the only way left is to "lower electron's kinetic energy" using some "cheating" tricks.
In this dirty tricks, quantum mechanics tries to lower only "electron's kinetic energy", keeping Coulomb potential energy unchanged (= Coulomb attraction between two atoms remains too weak to cause actual molecular bond in quantum mechanical cloud model ), which "illegitimately lowered kinetic energy" violates total energy conservation law, hence scientifically invalid, as I explain here.
How is such a unscientific trick possible ?
Schrödinger equation = the current only method of explaining atomic electron's behavior by quantum mechanics cannot be solved except for the simplest one-electron hydrogen atom.
So quantum mechanics has No method of describing any multi-electron atoms or molecules in an exact, righteous way.
Quantum mechanics just artificially chooses "fake solution" called basis set, which method of choosing arbitrary fake solution is "art" rather than science, which is useless.
The sum of Coulomb potential energy and electron's kinetic energy is the total energy which value must be conserved and constant wherever an electron moves inside the wavefunction which is the exact solution of Schrödinger equation giving constant total energy value.
Only solvable one-electron hydrogen atom can find exact solution and constant total (= ground-state ) energy E in Schrödinger equation, it means only one-electron hydrogen atom can rigorously obey total energy conservation law.
Quantum mechanics approximately treats hydrogen molecule (= H2 ) as "two overlapped hydrogen atomic wavefuncton", which is Not a true solution, so the total energy is Not conserved inside this fake H2 molecule solution.
In the hydrogen (= H ) atom-1's wavefunction inside H2 molecule, as the electron-1 moves farther away from the nucleus-1, Coulomb attraction between the electron-1 and nucleus-1 decreases, hence, Coulomb potential energy between the electron-1 and nucleus-1 becomes higher.
To conserve the total energy, the electron-1's kinetic energy must get lower to cancel higher Coulomb potential energy, as the electron-1 gets farther away from the nucleus-1 (= potential energy is higher ).
The total energy = lower kinetic energy + higher potential energy remains constant and conserved between the electron-1 and the nucleus-1 (= the total energy is conserved also between the electron-2 and nucleus-2 ).
Because in quantum mechanics which approximately treats H2 molecule as two hydrogen atoms, total energy between an electron and a nucleus is conserved only in each hydrogen atom. ← They don't think about energy conservation between different hydrogen atoms (= total energy between electron-1 and nucleus-2 is Not conserved ).
The problem is this total energy is Not conserved (= hence, wrong ! ) between the electron-1 and nucleus-2 ( or between the electron-2 and nucleus-1 ), because the electron-1 belongs to hydrogen atom-1, and nucleus-2 belongs to hydrogen atom-2.
In H2 molecule, even when the electron-1 approaches the other nucleus-2 and lowers Coulomb potential energy between the electron-1 and nucleus-2, the electron-1's kinetic energy expressed by "hydrogen atom-1 wavefuncton" remains lower.
The lower kinetic energy + lower potential energy → much lower total energy, which is No longer constant or conserved in the electron-1 approaching around the nucleus-2. ← violating total energy conservation law.
This "illegitimately lowered kinetic energy" of the electron-1 ( or 2 ) near the other nucleus-2 ( or 1 ) is the origin of fake molecular bond energy in quantum mechanics.
Because electron cloud which spreads all over the place, being distributed symmetrically around each nucleus cannot generate Coulomb attraction caused by localizing an electron only to one side of a nucleus (= lowering Coulomb potential energy → lowering total energy is impossible ) in quantum mechanical H2 molecule.
This cheap trick of quantum mechanics lowering only the electron's kinetic energy ( even in the area of lower Coulomb potential energy, → total energy conservation is violated ) is still Not enough to generate actual molecular bond energy.
Hence, another dirty trick or sneaky technique to seemingly lower total energy in an illegitimate way is necessary in quantum mechanics.
The electron-1's probability density decreases in the area farther away from the nucleus-1, so the electron-1 probability is much lower around the distant nucleus-2 (= where the electron-1's kinetic energy is lower ) than the electron-1 probability near the nucleus-1 (= where the electron-1's kinetic energy is higher ).
So the probability density of the electron with lower kinetic energy (= the electron-1's probability around nucleus-2 ) is too small to cause actual molecular bond by lowering total energy ( this p.3 ).
They need to expand the small probability density area (= around nucleus-2 ) of the electron-1 with lower kinetic energy using other illegitimate tricks called "overlap (= exchange ) integral".
To do so, quantum mechanics claims the electron-1 ( or 2 ) exists in both hydrogen atomic wavefunctions 1 and 2 simultaneously using parallel worlds.
In real hydrogen atoms of a hydrogen molecule,
The electron-1 mainly belongs to the nucleus-1 in hydrogen atom-1.
The electron-2 mainly belongs to the nucleus-2 in hydrogen atom-2.
In unreal hydrogen molecule in quantum mechanics,
The electron-1 belongs both to the nucleus-1 and nucleus-2 at the same time with the same probability.
The electron-2 belongs both to the nucleus-1 and nucleus-2 at the same time with the same probability.
Quantum mechanics claims the electron-1 can belong to both nucleus-1 and nucleus-2 at once like a ghost (= a particle can exist in different places at once in quantum parallel worlds ).
Hence, the electron-1 and electron-2 are indistinguishable and inseparable as "one fictitious pseudo-electron" inside a quantum H2 molecule.
The electron-1 existing in two different places simultaneously is supposed to have two different hydrogen atomic wavefunctions aroud nucleus-1 (= φ1 or φa ) and around nucleus-2 (= φ2 or φb ) at once, which is expressed as nonphysical "symmetric wavefunction".
When we choose this "symmetric wavefunction" as a fake solution and integrate it, we obtain fake energy containing unphysical overlap (= exchange ) integral ( this p.14 ).
With the help of this strange "exchange integral", the illegitimately lowered kinetic energy's area of electron-1 (= probability φ1 (e1) of electron-1 is very low around nucleus-2 without exchange integral ) is expanded by "exchanged wavefunction = φ2(e1)" which electron-1's probability is higher near nucleus-2.
So in quantum mechanical molecule, just ordinary Coulomb energy (= integral ) is Not enough to cause actual molecular bond energy, it needs unrealistic "exchange integral" ( this p.15-16, this p.4, figure-1 ).
By flipping the sign and changing this "exchange attractive energy causing fake molecular bond" into "exchange repulsion", it becomes Pauli exclusion repulsion, which is strangely Not admitted to be a true force, lacking force carrier. No physical interpretation is given to this unphysical, uncanny exchange energy ( this p.6 ), which disagrees with experimental facts, hence, useless in practical science.
Quantum mechanical wavefunction cannot distinguish between a particle and wave. ( while realistic atomic model can distinguish an electron particle from its de Broglie wave produced around the electron particle ).
Quantum mechanical electron cloud spreading everywhere cannot approach the other nucleus or avoid the other electron, hence, molecular bond by Coulomb attractive energy is impossible in quantum mechanics.
↑ The most important "Coulomb force" cannot be used in quantum mechanical chemical reaction ! ← Quantum mechanical atomic model is unreal and useless as a physical tool, forever.
Two hydrogen atoms (= spreading as electron clouds ) cannot generate enough Coulomb attractive force or energy to cause molecular bond in quantum mechanics.
Quantum mechanics artificially chooses "unphysical symmetric wavefunction" consisting of two indistinguishable hydrogen atoms as a fake solution of unsolvable Schrödinger equation of H2 molecule. ←Its integral causes "unphysical exchange (= overlap ) integral".
Quantum mechanics tries to lower electron's kinetic energy using illegitimate dirty tricks to generate fake molecular bond energy even by violating energy conservation law.
No realistic physical interpretation is given to this strange "exchange energy ( this p.3 )" where an electron can exist in different places or all different atoms simultaneously using quantum parallel worlds.
This unrealistically indistinguishable electron cloud model spreading the whole molecule prevents physicists from using quantum mechanics as a reliable, realistic tool, and they came to treat the whole many-electron molecule or solid as one pseudo-electron band or unreal quasiparticle model.
The fact that quantum mechanics cannot be used as a realistic atomic tool makes it impossible for us to utilize atomic behavior in applied science such as medicine and drug discovery due to useless quantum physics.
Humans already have excellent technology of observing and manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope.
In order to use each single atom and electron as realistic basic physical tools, we have to distinguish between a particle and wave, and of course, we have to treat different individual electrons belonging to different atoms as "distinguishable different objects", without relying on fictitious quasiparticle model or one-electron approximatnion = DFT.
For example, when we try to move an electron-1 from an atom-1 to another atom-2 using some nano-device, we have to treat electrons belonging to different places (= atom-1, atom-2, nano-device ) as distinguishable (= differently-movable ) electrons.
Unrealistic quantum mechanical world where each electron can exist in multiple different places at once like a ghost tries to treat electrons belonging to different atoms as an "indistinguishable unphysical entity" as seen in nonphysical "exchange energy" which is completely useless in actual nano-technology.
But when interpreting the observed data or images of atomic force microscope, all the current physicists blindly try to rely on unscientific DFT method ( this p.3 ), which treats all electrons belonging to different atoms as one big indistinguishable fictitious electron or quasiparticle.
And even when physicists measure Pauli exclusion repulstion, they can Not treat the Pauli repulsive force as a real force, as long as unreasonable quantum mechanical model is used to interpret the actually-measured force ( this p.10 ). ← this is ridiculous.
So quantum mechanics forbids physicists to treat different electrons belonging to different atoms as different individual real objects. Neither realistic physical interpretation nor treating Pauli repulsion as a real force is allowed in the current "mainstream" science.
This ambiguous and eerie quantum mechanical atomic world avoiding realistic interpretation stubbornly, shutting their eyes to underlying reality can never be put to practical use in actual science such as medicine and drug development.
Therefore, the first thing to do for utilizing atomic behavior in actual applied science or innovation is to discard useless, obsolete quantum mechanical model, and replace it by other realistic atomic models.
See this week physics is still useless.
(S-1) ↓ Useless physics created unreal concepts =
The current "science" pursues only illusion such as quantum mechanics, extra-dimensions, God particle, time travel, multiverse, mirror universe..
Physics professors became "pseudo-political analysts". Universities tied with criminal suspects make money by teaching pseudo-science = extra-dimensions.
You may often see incomprehensible word, "symmetry" in various scientific fields from particle to solid physics.
What the heck is this "symmetry" ?
Does this "symmetry" have anything to do with our physical world ?
In fact, this symmetry has nothing to do with real physical phenomena around us, hence, physically meaningless concept.
The present useless physics forced physicists to make up "unreal concepts" called "symmetry" as fictitious scientific goals like fantasy parallel worlds and Big Bang.
Quantum mechanics says each electron can become two conflicting things = a particle and wave, and exist in different places at once like a ghost.
So quantum mechanics can determine nothing about each particle's property (= a particle or wave ) or position. ← Completely useless atomic theory.
In 1920s, quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity were united into one pseudo-theory called "quantum field theory", which is just nonphysical abstract math with No relation to any real objects around us.
Quantum field theory impractically tries to apply only one abstract Einstein mass mc2 equation to every physical phenomenon in the universe in the form of Dirac equation. ← Impossible !
Quantum field theory can only express each electron and photon (= a particle of light ? ) as nonphysical math symbols (= a particle is expressed as a†, b†, c† .. ) without showing any more detailed physical figure of each particle than abstract math symbols.
This mathematical quantum field theory has No ability to explain actual complicated physical phenomena, because it uses only its unrealistic abstract math symbols as fictitious particles.
So physicists had to create other artificial fictitious concepts in order just to develop their pseudo-theory and explain various physical phenomena (= most of which are irrelevant to our daily life ), without showing detailed physical mechanism or delving into underlying reality.
One of these fictitious concepts is an unreal virtual particle as imaginary force carrier with unphysical mass ( this p.3 ).
Other unreal artificial concepts are electron's "spin" which is Not a real "spinning", and "exchange energy" which tries to describe Pauli exclusion principle just by artificial unphysical rule of "particle exchange", which is strangely Not a real force, and No physical interpretation can be given to it ( this p.6 ).
The only way for unrealistic quantum mechanics to explain physical phenomena and develop their pseudo-theory is to increase fictitious particles and concepts meaninglessly, without showing underlying concrete physical reality.
But just increasing unreal concepts or pseudo-particles in a random and disorderly way is purposeless and scientifically valueless, so physicists needed to create some new "artificial rule" seemingly connecting all fictitious particles and concepts to make their pseudo-science look scientifically "meaningful".
This "artificial rule" is so-called symmetry, which was introduced only to develop their unphysical quantum field theory, though "symmetry" has nothing to do with our real world or actual physical phenomena.
"Symmetry" is nothing but an unrealistic, unphysical, abstract math concept or rule fabricated by unreal quantum theory.
Dirac equation invented as the only equation describing quantum field theory is too simple and too abstract to explain various complicated physical phenomena.
Its nonphysical wavefunction (= ψ ) is supposed to represent all fermions such as electrons and quarks. Math symbol "A" represents a "photon". ← No more detailed description of each particle's shape ( this p.20 ), completely useless equation.
Physicists suddenly made up artificial rules = when this nonphysical wavefunction is changed by artificially-introduced "phase transformation" and the whole Dirac equation is invariant, it is called "symmetry" ( this p.11 ).
This "phase transformation" + "invariant equation" = "symmetry" is just an artificial rule which has nothing to do with real physical objects.
By increasing the number of types of these artificial "symmetry transformations", physicists came to increase fictitious particles such as quarks using this ad-hoc rule (= symmetry ) as an excuse to rely on fictitious particles.
When this artificial symmetry is broken by additional mass (= m ) term, this is called "Higgs mechanism", all of these particles are just nonphysical math symbols ( this p.7 ) without physical figure, hence they have nothing to do with our real world.
When this artificial "symmetry transformation" exchanges a particle for its imaginary "shadow particle", it is called "supersymmetry" which unphysical math concept also has nothing to do with our real world ( this p.11 ).
This unphysical concept called supersymmetry is necessary to reduce 26-dimensional string to 10-dimensional superstring theory ( this p.15 ).
Anyway, this string theory a.k.a "theory of everything" is untestable, hence, meaningless theory, because its extradimension can never been seen, and string theory including as many as 10500 freely adjustable parameters cannot predict any physical values.
This is why the leading string theorist, Witten gave up practical use of his pseudo-science (= extra-dimensions ) and is obsessed only with "politics" irrelevant to science now.
Supersymmetry also includes more than 100 freely-adjustable parameters which is completely useless, cannot predict any physical values.
The "reality" of a theory depends on whether the theory actually "influences" and contributes to actual technology improving our daily life.
Just because the theory got prestigious Nobel prize does Not mean the theory is real, as long as it is useless except as "political tool" to waste taxpayers' money in the name of "science".
Actually Nobody uses unseen extra-dimensions, supersymmetric particles, quarks, God particle Higgs, black hole or quantum computer in our daily life. It means all these particles are just worthless fiction, so is the "symmetry".
Physicists think only about wasting taxpayers' money in meaningless gigantic collider or fabricating imaginary particles in order just to develop their pseudo-theory and sell "sci-fi" books, forgetting practical use of real "science".
Nobody around you uses unreal "virtual particles of QED which is useless", because it lacks physical reality from the beginning, and its calculation results always diverge to infinity.
Physicists invented artificial trick called renormalization which cannot predict any physical values like freely-adjustable parameters by artificially subtracting arbitrary infinity from infinity to get finite values, which meaningless dirty trick was harshly criticized even by founders.
Unless we replace the current pseudo-physics by other real practical atomic theories, applying basic physics (← this must be a real theory, first ! ) to curing deadly diseases is impossible forever.
Sadly, also in the current outdated educational system, "going to schools perfunctorily or subsidizing old-fashioned academia" sacrificing students' future by forcing their fake science is its only (fictitious) goal like this unphysical "symmetry", forgetting teaching "real science".
See this week physics is still useless.
(S-1) ↓ Unreal artificial 'exchange energy' created by
The current mainstream 'science' pursues only fantasy things such as parallel worlds, extra-dimensions, "two places at once", and Big Bang.
Still No physicists understand what they are doing or where they are going in 'science'.
Physics turned into a mere 'political tool' or 'literature' to sell 'sci-fi' books, giving up practical use of science. ← Finding an effective cure for deadly viruses is impossible in this 'miserable' science forever.
If globalists, academia try to 'defund the police' and divert the money to their fake science under the name of "education", it will just postpone our chance to escape from fake science. ← vicious cycle.
If people want real 'freedom' from inconvenient 'social distancing' life under pandemic, the only way is to free us from 'old obsolete science' which academia has forced on us, stifling us, preventing developing an effective cure for diseases forever.
All these disaster, fake science and inconvenient life originated from unphysical quantum mechanics invented as a mere 'stopgap' atomic theory 100 years ago.
After realistic atomic model successfully explained one-electron hydrogen atom's quantized energies, it struggled to explain multi-electron atoms such as helium.
Helium atom has two moving electrons, so it is a complicated 'three-body problem' which required the help of modern computers to calculate its complicated atomic electrons' motions precisely.
Of course, there was No such thing as a convenient computer or PC in 1920s when physicists struggled to formulate the unseen atomic behavior and design the new model.
Unrealistic quantum mechanics was made up as a "stopgap theory" to fill the blank period of science until modern calculation tool = computer was invented, though we are still stuck in this old useless atomic model, wasting our useful computing resources even now.
Quantum mechanics fabricated unphysical 'spin' to seemingly tackle many-electron atoms which intrinsically cannot be dealt with by quantum mechanics.
Electron 'spin' is an unrealistic and contradictory concept which was artificially introduced to fit complicated atomic behavior caused by many electrons into old-fashioned quantum mechanical model, in an illegitimate way.
A hydrogen atom was known to generate magnetic field called Bohr magneton which observed magnetic field just agreed with the one explained by Bohr's classical orbit.
Quantum mechanical hydrogen must always include unrealistic zero angular momentum of an electron's orbit which means the electron always crashes into a nucleus. ← Unreasonable !
Zero orbital angular momentum generates No magnetic field.
So quantum mechanics artificially introduced unphysical 'spin' which coincidentally generates the same magnetic field as Bohr's classical orbit. ← Too good to be true.
The problem is an electron is very tiny, so each electron must be 'spinning' at far faster-than-light speed to generate the observed magnetic field. Therefore, quantum mechanics started to say electron 'spin' is Not a real 'spinning' ! ← self-contradiction ( this p.2 ).
Quantum mechanics also artificially and unjustifiably adjusted its ad-hoc spin model to fit the existing Bohr's model which had already succeeded in explaining finely split atomic spectrum without spin.
Quantum mechanics with 'spin' just exactly agreed with classical Bohr's orbit without spin in all atomic energy levels. ← What a coincidence !
The problem is the magnetic energy caused by electron spin is too weak to explain actual atomic behavior or energy levels. ← Electron spin is useless if it remains in its original definition of 'spin magnet'.
Coulomb electric force between electrons, which is a main contributor to various atomic phenomena, is much stronger than magnetic energy between electron spins, which spin magnetic force is negligibly small, too weak to apply in actual chemical reactions.
It is known that the third electron of lithium cannot enter innermost orbit, excluded by mysterious very powerful repulsion called Pauli exclusion principle which energy is as strong as Coulomb electric force ( > 30 eV, this p.8 ).
We can estimate the strength of magnetic energy between electrons by considering each electron spin as a "magnet (= magnetic dipole moment )".
This electron spin-spin magnetic dipole energy is far smaller ( < 0.0001 eV ) than actual Pauli repulsive energy.
So the influence of "electron spin" treated as "magnet (= original definition of spin )" is too small and disagrees with experimental facts, hence, 'spin' itself intrinsically cannot explain various actual physical phenomena or magnetic materials such as ferromagnet ( this p.6, this p.20 ).
But physicists had to continue their research, developing new stopgap theory (= even if it lacked reality, and faced opposition from founders ) to get research fund and good academic positions.
Physicists always craved some 'immediate answer', reason and mathematical formulation of underlying unseen atomic mechanism, even if its formulation resorted to unphysical objects.
This dire situation forced them to artificially make up new unphysical concept called "exchange energy ( this p.9 )" to explain the origin of powerful and mysterious Pauli exclusion repulsion and magnetic materials "quantum-mechanically" using unreal "spin".
This spin "exchange energy" is unrealistic and illogical with No physical interpretation ( this p.6, this p.3 ), it allegedly generates strong Pauli repulsive force, but cannot be treated as real "force", lacking a force carrier. ← self-contradiction, and it's like a ghost !
Of course, this strange spin 'exchange energy' is neither magnetic nor electric energies ( due to 'Not forces' ), so it cannot be explained by any real things existing in this world, though exchange energy is supposed to be as strong as electric energy.
It's impossible to express this uncanny Pauli spin 'exchange energy' by any imaginable real physical objects. Then, how does quantum mechanics describe the ghost-like concept in "mathematical (= nonphysical ) language ?
Quantum mechanics says Pauli exclusion principle is expressed as "nonphysical antisymmetric wavefunction" where exchanging labels of two electrons flips the sign of the whole wavefunction. ← That's all. No more detailed physical reason behind Pauli principle is given !
Quantum mechanics cannot express each particle or electron's spin as real physical objects, it only expresses each electron as nonphysical math symbol (= an electron = a†, b†, c† = math symbol ), and each spin as two kinds of unphysical arrows ( spin = ↓ or ↑ ). No concrete physical shape or size was given to each electron and spin ( this p.2 right ).
Using this unphysical electron symbol, Pauli principle is expressed as abstract "anticommutation" where exchanging two electrons flips the sign. ← No more detailed physical interpretation of Pauli exclusion energy is given, except unphysical math.
Of course, it's impossible to describe actual complicated Pauli exclusion energies using only strange rule = "flipped sign" by exchanging nonphysical "spins" represented as two types of abstract arrows with No physical figure.
So quantum mechanics just explains each material using artificial rough approximation = "exchange parameter (= J )" which value can be freely changed and adjusted in different materials without detailed underlying physical mechanism. ← Cut too many corners, hence scientifically valueless method.
Just artificially changing free parameter J as the fictitious quantitative origin of strange Pauli exchange energy in various magnetic materials without giving any concrete physical interpretation ( this p.8 ) is meaningless and useless when we try to predict new physical phenomena using basic common realistic physical tools without relying on freely-adjustble parameters.
It's impossible for quantum mechanics which stubbornly rejects realistic interpretation of basic physical mechanism to explain and predict actual complicated phenomena precisely.
So quantum mechanics can describe complicated many-electron material or solid only as very rough unphysical approximation using one fictitious quasi-electron ( or band ) with fake (= effective ) mass, which can even be unreal negative mass, or fake charge ( this p.10 ).
When quantum mechanics talks about condensed matter physics and spintronics, its "spin" does Not belong to real electron. The spin is related to fictitious electrons ( this p.2, 4 ) or unreal quasiparticle with fake (= effective ) mass ( this p.3 ) which can freely deviate from real electron's mass, losing tough with reality.
So when physicists mention the spin-orbit interaction of material, its spin often means "fake spin" related to fake electron (= effective ) mass ( this p.5 ) with No more real physical interpretation, and those artificial values (= fake effective mass or spin-orbit ) are freely adjustable parameters ( this p.3, this p.9 ), and completely different from free real electrons in the vacuum ( this p.2 left ).
↑ The current solid-physics relying on fictitious concepts lacks reality, and cannot be applicable to other science such as medicine.
What quantum mechanical method can calculate about unreal quasiparticle, electron's fake (= effective ) masses and freely-adjustable meaningless parameters ( this p.5 ) ?
This stopgap quantum mechanical calculation method is a very rough and inaccurate approximation callded density functional theory (= DFT ), which unrealistically treats the whole material as one fictitious electron with fake mass.
DFT replaces multi-electron potential energy by fictitious non-interacting pseudo effective potential energy called "exchange-correlation functional", which allegedly includes Pauli exclusion 'exchange energy', but it's just pseudo-Pauli energy.
Because DFT can treats only a single fictitions electron ( this p.3 ) even in many-electron materials, which has to replace the original Pauli exchange energy caused by multi-electron spins by non-interacting pseudo-potential energy including only one electron.
The forms of these pseudo-potential (= exchange-correlation functional ) are unknown, and can be freely chosen or changed in different situations and materials, so DFT without common physical potential energy's form has No ability to predict new physical phenomena, it always fails ( this p.17 ), hence useless.
There are No practical quantum mechanical methods to predict physical phenomena using real objects. → There is No evidence of strange electron 'spin'.
First of all, quantum mechanical atomic model, which was introduced as a "stopgap theory" 100 years ago when there were No modern computers to calculate precise many-electron motion, is intrinsically unable to treat many-electron atoms or molecules, no matter how we tweak quantum mechanical artificial concepts.
Each atom or molecule around us is stable in its unique ground-state (= lowest ) energy. This stable lowest total energy must always be conserved and fixed at the lowest allowable energy value, wherever electrons are moving around inside an atom or molecule.
Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics can solve only one-electron hydrogen atom which is the only atom whose solution successfully shows the total energy as the conserved and constant one, wherever an electron exits inside a hydrogen atom (= wavefunction ).
Solving Schrödinger equation means we can find its exact solution which gives some constant and fixed lowest total energy E value of an atom.
The problem is Schrödinger equation always fails in any multi-electron atoms except one-electron hydrogen.
Due to unphysical uncertainty principle, each electron of quantum mechanics has to always spread all over an entire atom as vague electron cloud where an electron can allegedly be in any different places using parallel worlds at once. ← No restriction on each electron's position, which is completely uncertain and can be everywhere in quantum mechanics.
So in multi-electron atoms or molecules expressed as quantum mechanical electron clouds, two electrons cannot avoid each other (= because each electron can always be everywhere ) despite repulsive Coulomb force pushing apart two electrons. ← self-contradiction
In this unrealistic quantum mechanical cloud, the distance between two electrons can take any values from zero (= Coulomb repulsive potential energy between two electrons increases to infinity ) to infinity (= Coulomb repulsive energy between electrons decreases to zero ), defying Coulomb repulsion.
These "unlimited electrons' positions" in quantum mechanical electron clouds make it impossible to obtain the fixed lowest total atomic energy value by solving Schrödinger equation in multi-electron atoms.
So the total energy is Not conserved or constant in quantum mechanical atoms except one-electron hydrogen, hence quantum mechanics is wrong.
It is impossible to find exact solution, which can give the constant lowest ground state energy in Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms, which is why "stopgap" quantum mechanics cannot deal with multi-electron atoms, and it has to rely on fictitious one-electron approximation in solid physics.
Quantum mechanics claims Pauli exclusion (exchange) energy is expressed as unphysical antisymmetric wavefunction where exchanging labels of two electrons ( 1 ↔ 2 ) changes the sign of the whole wavefunction, which is just a artificially-introduced stopgap rule with No relation to our real world. ← Hence, Pauli exclusion principle is given No physical interpretation.
The only difference between "symmetric" and "antisymmetric" (= this corresponds to Pauli principle ) wavefunctions are the sign connecting two identical wavefunctions exchanging labels of two atoms.
The form of each term of these two types of wavefunctions is completely the same.
So the total energy E of both symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions should be completely the same, if this multi-electron Schrödinger equation has exact solution (= solvable ).
This fact is self-contradictory and invalidating Pauli exchange energy, because in solvable Schrödinger equation, the effect of Pauli principle disappears and becomes meaningless due to No difference between symmetric and antisymmetic wavefunctions' energies.
Artificial Pauli exchange energy appears only when Schrödinger equation cannot be solved.
Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms can never be solved.   ← quantum mechanics is wrong.
If Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms can be solved, → No difference between symmetric and antisymmetic wavefunctions' energies. → Pauli principle energy disappears. ← quantum mechanics is wrong after all.
All Schrödinger equations of multi-electron atoms are unsolvable. Hence, we have to artificially choose fake solution called 'basis set' to calculate fake total energy by integrating chosen wavefunction instead of solving it (= because it cannot be solved ), which quantum mechanical calculation is just "art" rather than "science".
Quantum mechanics cannot solve multi-electron Schrödinger equation. → They just choose fake solution. → Integrate chosen (antisymmetric) wavefunction. → Unphysical "Pauli exchange energy" appears in the form of "integral".
This is why unreal Pauli principle "exchange energy", which can be expressed only as unphysical integration of chosen fake solution (= antisymmetric wavefunction ) due to unsolvable Schrödinger equation, still lacks physical interpretation (= Pauli exchange energy cannot be expressed as real objects ).
Two electron of quantum mechanics cannot avoid each other due to "electron cloud", which makes it impossibe to generate stable molecular bond where each negative electron has to approach another positive nucleus, avoiding another negative electron to cause stable molecular bond by Coulomb attraction between electrons and nuclei.
So quantum mechanical molecule based on unreal electron "probability" cloud spreading all over the place (= hence, two electrons cannot avoid each other ) has to rely on "cheating" where illegitimately lowered kinetic energy of an electron approaching another nucleus violating total energy conservation rule is the main (fake) generator of fictitious stable molecular bond energy by quantum mechanics.
Unphysical symmetric or antisymmetric wavefunctions and its exchange integral are exploited to enhance this illegitimately lowered (fake) kinetic energy effect by violating energy conservation law in fake quantum mechanical molecular bond.
This is why physicists cannot use these unphysical spin 'exchange energy' or Schrödinger equation in actual applied science, and they have to rely only on unreal quasiparticle model and one-pseudo-electron DFT calculation method in all solids or molecular physics.
We already have the excellent technology of manipulating even each single atom to develop useful nano-technology controlling many-electron nano-machines precisely which surely leads to curing deadly diseases.
But as long as we rely on the current quantum mechanical useless atomic model which intrinsically cannot deal with multi-electron atoms, designing and utilizing multi-electron molecular nano-machines are impossible forever.
So the first thing for us to do is replace the current old unphysical quantum mechanical model by other real atomic models which can treat multi-electron atoms where many electrons are actually moving and avoiding each other.
↑ These complicated three-body problems can be dealt with precisely using the current computer technology which didn't exist when old quantum mechanics was born 100 years ago.
See this week physics is still useless.
(V-1) ↓ 200-year-old vaccine is the only hope of ?
Now all countries and drugmakers are rushing to develop dreamlike coronavirus vaccine as the only hope for containing unprecedented pandemic.
But vaccine development usually takes an incredibly long time.
Even the mumps vaccine, which was the fastest ever approved, took four years.
No vaccines against the coronavirus family such as SARS and MERS succeeded so far. Rapid loss of COVID-19 antibodies indicates both herd immunity and vaccine development will be difficult.
In fact, basic technology of developing vaccine has Not progressed since Jenner first succeeded in using vaccine against smallpox more than 200 years ago.
Vaccine is very simple = inject virus antigen into body → some natural immune cells may produce antibodies against viruses. This traditional old procedure has remained unchanged for more than 200 years.
Antibody test and immunotherapy also use the same old technique of injecting antigens of viruses or cancer cells into animals, expecting their natural immune cells will produce effective antibodies. ← But in most cases, it failed.
The current human technology cannot design or produce antibodies from scratch directly. All we can do is blindly inject some (virus) antigens or proteins into bodies. It is impossible for us to predict how immune cells respond to the injection.
Because precise atomic mechanism of human immune cells producing antobodies is still unknown and uncontrollable.
This is why 'unpredictable' vaccine development takes an extremely long time and may cause unexpected severe side effects.
And almost all vaccine development ends up in failure, wasting huge taxpayers' money.
Even the simplest common cold and HIV viruses are still incurable, despite a long-time research for finding "miracle drug or vaccine".
All problems boil down to the basic science = quantum mechanics that has remained unrealistic, unchanged and stopped all applied science such as medicine from advancing for 100 years.
Quantum mechanics is filled with "physically-contradictory" concepts such as "a particle in two places at once", rewriting the past, afterlife, negative mass, negative kinetic energy, a dead and alive cat, faster-than-light entanglement.
It's impossible to utilize "physically-contradictory" basic quantum mechanics for developing actual science such as medical technology, because "physically-contradictory" means quantum mechanics lacks reality.
Physicists turned this useless physics into a mere political tool (= extra-dimensionist ) and literature (= dark-matterist ) to sell books (= parallel-world believer ), because their pseudo-science has No practical application.
Quantum mechanics was created as the only atomic theory a long, long time ago when physicists couldn't use convenient modern computers. Computers are necessary to calculate many-body effects in many-electron atoms and molecules.
Without computers, it was impossible for physicists to establish a new atomic theory which can handle many electrons and many atoms in solids and molecules.
So quantum mechanics is intrinsically an "impractical atomic theory" which cannot deal with complicated chemical or biological reactions involving many atoms and electrons.
The practical atomic theory has to deal with complicated many-electron atoms. But old quantum mechanics has No ability to deal with many-electron atoms due to lack of modern computers when quantum mechanics was formulated in 1920s, which caused many self-contradictions and unrealistic concepts in today's quantum physics.
Without computers, physicists had No choice but to replace realistic classical atomic model by unreal, unphysical electron's spin model which is coincidentally supposed to generate the same magnetic field (= Bohr magneton ) and energy level difference as Bohr's classical orbit.
But for a very tiny electron to generate the observed strong magnetic field, each electron has to spin far faster than light unrealistically. So physicists made an excuse that electron "spin" does Not mean actual "spinning".
Quantum mechanics started to accept self-contradictroty and unrealistic concepts such as "spin" as the result of struggling to apply complicated physical phenomena to unphysical, ad-hoc theory forcibly in the unmodernized period 100 years ago ( this p.5 ).
Basically, the magnetic force or energy is negligibly smaller and weaker than other forces such as Coulomb electric force or energy.
The magnetic force of electron spin is Not powerful enough to cause actual chemical or biological reaction, because its magnetic force is far weaker than Coulomb electric force, which is the main generator of physical phenomena.
But for nonphysical ad-hoc quantum mechanical theory, this unreal electron spin was the only tool available for researchers to develop their theory and explain complicated physical phenomena in old 1920s.
Because abstract unphysical spin can be simply expressed just as two kinds of arrows or math symbols without showing any concrete physical figure ( this p.2 ), which simple spin description doesn't require sophisticated modern computers.
Of course, it's impossible to describe actual complicated physical and biological reactions using only this simple, unphysical electron "spins" with magnetic force which is too weak to explain influential atomic behavior.
So physicists needed to make up other artificial new concepts called "exchange energy" where Pauli exclusion force is allegedly caused by nonphysical "flipped sign" by exchanging two electrons. ← No more detailed mechanism of how this strange "exchange energy" is generated.
This artificial and unrealistic "exchange force or energy" lacks force carriers, hence any realistic explanation of this strange Pauli exchange force or energy is impossible ( this p.6 ).
Magnetic field utilized in solids such as ferromagnet is supposed to be caused by this unreal electron "spin" with No further detailed physical explanation, except naming it "spintronics".
But as I said, the magnetic force caused by electron spin is too weak to generate meaningful physical phenomena such as the ferromagnetism ( this p.6 ). So the convenient, artificial "exchange force" (= lack physical interpretation ! ) was made up as ad-hoc imaginary savior for explaining ferromagnetic phenomenon. ← too good to be true ( this p.20 )
Quantum mechanics could Not explain mulit-electron atoms.
→ Unreal "spin" was made up in 1920s.
→ This electron spin is Not "real spinning", and its spin magnetic force is too weak to cause actual phenomena such as Pauli exclusion force and ferromagnet.
→ Another artificial, nonphysical concept ="exchange energy" was made up as an ad-hoc savior to help electron spin seemingly explain complicated physical phenomena, sacrificing its realistic interpretation.
→ All physical phenomena such as solid-physics have to be explained by unreal, artificial concepts in quantum mechanics. ← vicious cycle.
So the current condensed matter physics has to rely on unreal quasiparticle model and bogus one-pseudo-electron DFT calculation method, which unphysical quantum mechanical concepts stop our "science" from progressing now. → No dreamlike vaccine or drug can be developed.
Physicists hate "ambiguous" situation. They always crave "some answer", formulation, reason or common physical principle, even if these principles are unreal, artificial and unrelated to our real world.
So physicists were Not allowed to halt developing their ad-hoc theory or hypothesis, just because modern computers necessary to calculate actual many-body physical phenomena were unavailable in 1920s. → Contradictory quantum mechanics had to be made up.
Unphysical theory needed to create other unphysical theories to proceed.
Therefore, physicists made up another artificial, unphysical rule called "symmetry" only to develop their ad-hoc theory, which "symmetry" has nothing to do with our real world.
Under this artificial principle called symmetry, particle physicists started to claim many (fictional) particles might be created with the help of imaginary virtual particles only inside artificial circumstances such as particle colliders.
These unstable, unseen elementary particles are just illusion, as shown in the fact that the only purpose of the current miserable particle physics is to get taxpayers' money for meaningless gigantic colliders, while many people are suffering from unprecedented economic recession by pandemic.
And all other physicists also had No choice but to escape from reality, and seek "imaginary scientific targets" such as fictional parallel-world quantum computer, black hole, BigBang, multiverse, unseen dimensions as "theory of everything" in vain.
These fantasy basic physics is the reason why the current medical technology stalls and old-fashioned vaccine is still the only hope for tackling viruses. ← Strong evidence that science makes No progress recently.
Quantum mechanics introduced in 1920s when there were No modern computers to calculate complicated many-electron atoms or molecules, so quantum mechanics is intrinsically unable to deal with many-body effect or many-electron atoms, molecules, proteins. ← Drug development is intrinsically impossible by quantum mechanics.
So physicists needed to make up artificial circumstances and concepts such as unrealistic "spin" and quasiparticle to seemingly handle many-electron atoms or molecules which are intrinsically impossible to handle by quantum mechanics.
But once even this unrealistic quantum mechanics was accepted as the only ( ad-hoc ) atomic theory and got prestigious Nobel prizes, academia desperately tries to protect these pseudo-science only for sticking to their academic status, even by spreading deadly viruses, endangering people's lives in "dictatorial school" system.
So the first thing for us to do for containing deadly viruses is replace old useless quantum mechanical atomic model by new real one that can treat many-electron atoms using realistic particles with No self-contradiction or unreal spin, which calculation needs computers.
This practical approach to apply basic physics to drug development was impossible for old quantum mechanical model, which was introduced 100 years ago and already contaminated with many artificial, irreparable fictitious concepts such as quasiparticles, spin and fake mass model.
This is why Microsoft, Gates foundation = ardent supporter of vaccine, is also promoting the impossible dream of creating unscientific parallel-world quantum computer using fictional quasiparticle which pseudo-basic physics prevents them from clarifying deeper atomic mechnism of virus infection and immune response to produce effective, safe vaccine.
See this week physics is still useless.
(Q-1) ↓ Defund quantum mechanics with unreal !
Still No cure for deadly coronaviruses.
All attempts to find miracle drugs have failed.
There is a growing risk of 2nd and 3rd waves of the coronavirus outbreak, as next winter gets closer. Strict social distancing cripples economy.
No guarantee that very old primitive approach = vaccine, which development usually takes an extremely long time, will work.
All diseases including viruses invade human bodies and spread through "atomic or molecular interaction". So elucidating atomic mechanism will surely lead to finding effective drugs or treatments.
But quantum mechanics, which is the only atomic theory for now, devotes all its time and energy into "fantasy things" such as parallel worlds, an object in two places at once, fake quasi-particles with unreal mass.
Therefore, replacing fictional and useless quantum mechanics by other real atomic models is the first thing to do to develop an innovative treatment for deadly diseases.
Why is quantum mechanics so unrealistic ?
What made its solid-physics so useless as to be avoided by biology and medical researchers ?
An electron shows both particle and wave nature.
An electron is obviously a negatively charged particle moved by Coulomb electric force.
At the same time, an electron is de Broglie wave which interference was actually observed in many experiments, and this electron as de Broglie wave is necessary for determining quantized atomic energy levels, which were also precisely measured and support de Broglie wave theory.
Quantum mechanics uses both these electron particle and de Broglie wave for its calculation. But its Schrödinger wave function is nothing but a nonphysical, abstract "wave" which contains No clear electron particle.
This quantum "wavefunction" is referred to as a vague electron cloud spreading all over space, obscuring the electron's position, motion and shape, using uncertainty principle as an excuse.
So quantum mechanics failed to describe each electron as a real particle or wave in detail, stuck in its disastrous unrealistic atomic picture, which still nobody understands.
A "particle" and "wave" are completely different objects incompatible with each other due to their completely different physical properties which can never coexist in one object.
So it's impossible that an electron is both a particle and wave, or we need other realistic explanation.
If physicists want to treat an electron as "wave", they can use only nonphysical "wavefunction" without clear electron particles as long as they believe in quantum mechanics.
And when they want to treat an electron as a particle, only "fictitious" particles can be used to explain their particle-like behavior and interaction.
For this fictitious "particle" interaction model without wave, quantum mechanics uses "unreal, virtual particles" which cannot be expressed by any real classical particles.
To explain electrons interacting with each other via Coulomb electric force and virtual particles, quantum mechanics uses abstract, nonphysical Feynman diagram, which tells us nothing about detailed mechanism of how "electron particles" interact with each other via "unreal virtual photons" with imaginary mass ( this p.3 ).
An electron and a photon (= a fictitious quantum particle of light wave ) are expressed just as nonphysical math symbols ( electron or photon = a†, b†, c† .. = math symbols ) with No concrete physical shape, which tells us nothing about how particles touch or interact with each other in detail.
Because those abstract math symbols contain No information about particle's shape, property or position except for abstract math symbols. = Unrealistic quantum mechanics tries to avoid clarifying deeper truth or mechanism of particle-wave mystery forever.
In solid physics, quantum mechanics claims superconductivity is caused by an exchange of "virtual phonon quasiparticle" which is an unreal, fictitious particle with fake mass and charge.
Each superconductor or solid contains many atoms and electrons.
So the realistic atomic model should describe the superconductor as one consisting of many real electrons and nuclei interacting with each other via Coulomb force and de Broglie wave.
But unrealistic quantum mechanics, which cannot treat many-electron solids or superconductors as they are, describe the supercoductor using only several nonphysical math symbols (= superconductor = a†a, which symbols mean fictitious electron or quasiparticle allegedly representing the whole superconductor ).
To develop the theory using only nonphysical math symbols as fictitious particles, quantum mechanics has to artificially prepare other unreal quasiparticles as a means to explain various physical phenomena of superconductivity ( this p.12, this p.4 ). ← nonsense.
This unreal quasiparticle model, which was introduced a century ago, is still used as the only tool to explain superconductor and solid physics, and got even Nobel prize ( this p.8 ) which prestigious prizes, after all, just obstruct our innovation by their fake science now.
So in order to explain new physical phenomena, all quantum mechanics can do is artificially increase "new unreal quasiparticles" which are also expressed just as nonphysical math symbols ( this p.6 ) and tell us nothing about detailed mechanism of how these unreal quasiparticles interact with real particles. ← Meaningless, useless model.
As shown here, if quantum mechanics tries to explain physical phenomena using only "particles", it has to rely on unreal virtual particles and quasi-particles which unphysical atomic model can never be applied to other fields such as medicine or drug discovery.
How about "wave"-like description of physical phenomena by quantum mechanics ?
Unfortunately, quantum mechanics also has to rely on unreal physical concepts, even when it uses "wave".
Quantum mechanics describes the whole solid or semiconductor as "band model" which consists of several nonphysical band-like "waves" which allegedly spread over the whole solid.
Each band is a mere "line" showing only energy and momentum (= No position ) of fictitious quasi-electron with unreal (= effective ) mass which artificial mass can be freely and unrealistically changed from the original free electron mass in different directions or even be negative mass ( this p.6 ).
So each quasi-electron spreads over the whole solid as nonphysical "band (= each band allegedly shows an average energy level )" with No definite position or shape of a particle ( this p.4 ). The curvature of this band is supposed to represent fictitious electron's effective mass.
This quantum mechanical band model can neither designate each electron's position nor show how multiple particle-like electrons interact with each other. Then, how can this nonphysical band model describe actual various physical phenomena ?
In this band model, "one single fictitious quasi-electron" spreading over the whole solid (= hence, this fake electron has No definite position, like a ghost ) allegedly represents the rough "average" effect of all electrons inside the solid. ← Too rough approximation to use in actual science.
Physicists invented easy but unreasonable approximate calculation method called density functional theory (= DFT or Kohn-Sham theory ) to fit this band model artificially.
DFT forcibly replaced real many-electron solids by "fictitious one-electron wavefunction model" with unreal (= effective ) pseudo-potential energy called exchange-correlation functional.
The accurate form of this effective pseudo-potential (= electron-correlation functional ) is unknown and can be freely chosen, so DFT has No ability to predict new physical phenomena.
Because DFT just chooses convenient artificial pseudo-potential and "adjusts" the free parameters, the form of this pseudo-potential and wavefunction (= fake chosen solution ) to experimental values. ← Meaningless model.
No matter what this fictitious pseudo-potential functional is invented, someone will always find the case where it fails ( this p.17 ). DFT calculation results are often bad, and disagree with quantum mechanical band model's energy gap values.
If there is another useful atomic model replacing quantum mechanics, this realistic atomic model must express each electron or solid using real particle and wave instead of unreal virtual or quasi-particles without any contradicton or mystery, and explain many-electron solids as they are (= explain many-electron solids using many real electrons as they are ).
Quantum mechanical atomic model, which is based on unreal virtual particles, quasiparticles with fake (= effective) mass and one-pseudo-electron DFT calculation method, cannot be used as a useful, realistic atomic model or tool in applied science such as medicine, because actual science has to deal with materials containing "many-electrons" realistically.
Now humans already have the excellent technology of manipulating each single atom one by one and measuring its atomic force precisely.
But each time physicists measure a single atom or molecule using state-of-the-art atomic force microscopy, quantum mechanics can only treat atoms as fictitious quasiparticle model with fake mass, and try to treat actual multi-electron atoms or solids as one-fake-electron DFT model, which failed quantum mechanical model can never be applied to actual nano-technology dealing with many "real" electrons.
So as long as we refuse to replace 100-year-old useless, unrealistic quantum mechanical model by other real new one, the development of our science and effective drugs for deadly diseases is impossible forever.
For 100 years, quantum mechanics has just tried to express actual complicated many-electron material as nonphysical bands where each electron and fictitious quasiparticle are expressed as nonphysical math symbols (= ex. an electron is expressed only as an abstract math symbol = c† ) with No physical figure except unreal "spin" which tells us nothing about detailed mechanism of what's going on inside materials.
And its free parameters and fictitious electron effective mass are artifically adjusted to fit experimental results like artificial form of DFT pseudo-potential and quasiparticle model ( this p.5, this p.2 ), which is just useless, cannot predict any new physical phenomena, as long as it depends on unrealistic physical concepts such as quasiparticle and effective mass.
Now physicists such as Witten seem to be obsessed only with irrelevant "politics", forgetting scientific research, because their so-called "science" such as extra-dimensions, astronomy and parallel worlds are just fiction, and it will never be put to practical use.
So the current so-called "science" based on fictional quantum mechanics is nothing but a "political tool" or literature just to sell books. ← No practical use.
"Defund fake science" instead of "defund the police" is what we should do first.
Academia should stop using racial issue to pressure gorvernments into spending more taxpayers' money in their fake science in the name of education, which will just further increase college tuition and ruin students' future by their useless science.
Each time scientists detect some 'slight signals', which is too week to affect our daily life, so useless, they like to claim these might indicate the existence of new particles or matter, though these are illusion. ← It's about time to end this "vicious" practice of academia pretending so-called "science discovery" using meaninglessly too weak signals.
See this week physics is still useless.
(Q-1) ↓ Fictional atomic model in
The current "science" theory is worthless, losing touch with reality.
COVID-19 viruses are still spreading in the world, and the science can never find a cure for those deadly diseases, exposing its uselessness.
Even renowned peer-reviewd journals spread false information without shame about recent hydroxychloroquine, losing credibility.
WHO often made contradictory comments, confusing people.
Why did WHO with ample funds and "scientists" take so much time to find even the very simple and obvious fact that "mask" is effective ?
People started to doubt the so-called "experts" spreading false information and "science", which the climate activist, Greta often touted.
If academia tries to use racial issue to "defund the police" and divert the money to their "fake science" such as illusory extra-dimensions, parallel worlds, fictional cosmology and black hole in the name of "education", it is unjustifiable.
The main reason why the current "science" is pursuing only fiction and useless in medicine originates in the fact that the current basic physics has stubbornly rejected real physical objects for 100 years.
The only tool to express the behavior of atoms and electrons is unphysical Schrödinger equation. Its wave function has No ability to decide whether each electron is a particle or wave. ← nonsense.
Schrödinger wave function cannot even show the position and velocity of each particle, using fishy uncertainty principle as an excuse.
First of all, a particle and wave are completely different things in not only their shapes but also properties. So it is impossible that a particle and wave contradicting each other coexist inside the same physical object such as an electron and a photon.
An particle must be an unbreakable "round-shaped" object.
Wave is dividable, able to split into multiple smaller waves to cause interference.
So in double-slit experiment, unphysical quantum mechanics has to rely on fantasy parallel worlds where each unbreakable electron ( or a photon ) appears to "split" into its two doppelgangers in two parallel worlds, pass through two slits simultaneously, and interfere with itself.
Therefore, accepting the unrealistic quantum mechanical view that each electron can be both a particle and wave requires other unrealistic concepts such as fantasy "parallel worlds". ← vicious cycle.
Whether an electron has a particle-like shape or wave-like shape is uncertain. → Hence, the detailed mechanism of how a particle-like electron or photon interferes with its "doppelganger particle" like wave is an unsolvable mystery, forever. ← Science makes No more progress, stuck in two conflicting concepts of a particle and wave.
Science stops progressing, and scientists can do nothing in this unphysical, unimaginable and contradictory quantum mechanics which offers No basic information about the object's shape, size or property. ← No useful tools. But everybody stops exploring deeper truth.
The smallest fundamental physical object = an electron is essential to explain all physical phenomena as a tool. But quantum mechanics tells us nothing about the clear electron's shape or nature, hence, it prevents us from using electrons as essential tools in applied science forever.
Quantum mechanical "uncertain" wavefunction forces us to accept ridiculous idea that each electron "particle" must always spread over all space like "wave" which allegedly represents the "probability" of finding an electron in each place covered by wave function.
It means each object or an electron can be in multiple different places at once like ghost. ← This "fantasy" world is the consequence of absurd uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.
So according to quantum mechanics, each electron can exist in two different orbits or energy states simultaneously, like a fictional cat which can be dead and alive at the same time using different parallel worlds.
Actually, these quantum mechanical parallel worlds are unrealistic and useless, as shown in fishy quantum computer and information which try to exploit illusory parallel worlds for its fake speed-up and remain impractical forever.
Whether each electron is a particle or wave is uncertatin
→ Each electron's physical shape and nature is uncertain.
→ We cannot utilize such a ghost-like electron whose "everything" is uncertain in actual science as a physical tool.
An electron as a negatively-charged particle can avoid other negatively-charged electron due to Coulomb repulsion. On the other hand, if an electron is vague wave spreading as electron cloud, the wave-like electron cannot avoid other electrons despite the repulsion between electrons.
Because the "wave-like electron" must always exist "everywhere" (= so this electron cannot move or avoid like a normal particle. = unrealistic ! ) covered by wavefunction which allegedly expresses the vague probability of finding an electron in each place.
Wherever the amplitude of wavefunction (= probability of an electron ) is not zero, the electron always has a chance of appearing.
→ An electron can be in all places at once, wherever its wavefunction spreads.
If electrons cannot avoid other electrons due to its "wave-like" shape and absurd uncertainty principle rule, they cannot explain actual multi-electron atoms or molecular behavior where multiple electrons must always be moving and avoiding each other due to Coulomb repulsion in order to decrease their total energy.
So it's impossible for unrealistic wave-like electrons which cannot avoid each other to keep their total energy down to the lowest ground-state energy, obeying energy conservation law.
→ Quantum mechanics has to use "illogical cheating" (= violation of energy conservation law ) to obtain energies of multi-electron atoms or molecules.
This is why Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms cannot be solved (= only choosing fake solution and energy is possible, it's like an "art", Not science ), which means correct description of real multi-electron atoms or molecules is impossible in quantum mechanics.
An electron acting like a "negatively charged particle" moving and avoiding other negative electrons is the established fact confirmed in many experiments.
Each electron is also known to behave as "de Broglie wave" which interference was actually observed in many experiments.
Two conflicting concepts of a particle and wave cannot coexist.
We have to choose one of them, though even this "realistic choice" is forbidden in uncertain quantum mechanics which gave up clarifying deeper truth.
The only realistic idea with No contradictory wave-particle duality is that an electron should be accepted as a "particle" moving through some "medium" where de Broglie "wave" is actually produced as real wave around the particle-like electron.
This realistic atomic model accepting electrons as real particles and treating de Broglie wave as one generated around electrons failed to calculate mult-electron atoms such as helium, though this model is the only right answer.
Because physicists had No modern computers to calculate complicated multi-electrons' motion = three-body problem in multi-electron atoms in 1920s when they had to choose unrealistic quantum mechanics to continue their research.
Each wave consists of two phases of "crest" and "trough", one of which must envelop an electron particle which is kicked out in the case of destructive interference where the crest and trough wave phases crash.
So distinguishing between the crest and trough phases of each electron de Broglie wave is essential to describe actual atomic behavior, but its distinction is impossible in quantum mechanical wave function.
Quantum mechanical wavefunction cannot designate the position of electron, hence, each electron must exist everywhere inside wavefunction which cannot distinguish two phases; crest or trough (= only in one of these two phases, an electron should exist ) of de Broglie wave.
This is also one of serious problems of quantum mechanics which cannot describe actual interference mechanism in a realistic wave (= the trough and crest of the electron de Broglie wave overlap → destructive interference → An electron is expelled ).
Therefore, quantum mechanics had No choice but to dismiss real wave picture, and its interference mechanism remains uncertain forever, which led to the present fantasy quantum mechanical world.
Especially in multi-electron atoms such as helium, we must consider interference of mutiple electrons' de Broglie waves, which realistic view consistent with actually observed experimental facts is impossible in quantum mechanical nonphysical wavefunction.
Therefore, quantum mechanics has to adopt unphysical spin and contradictory, uncanny Pauli exclusion principle which physical mechanism and the origin of Pauli exclusion force are still uncertain mystery ( this p.6 ) like a ghost phenomenon with No force or its force carriers.
Quantum mechanics dismissed "realistic atomic picture" in all materials.
It expresses each solid or crystal as an "nonphysical band model" which contains No real electrons with definite physical shape, hence, whether an electron is a particle or wave remains uncertain also in this band model.
The slope of the band is said to express fake (= effective ) mass of fictitious electrons ( this p.15 ). Surprisingly, this fake mass of a crystal electron can be unrealistically negative. ← ridiculous.
Quantum mechanics and physicists have to rely on unreal "quasiparticle" with fake mass and charge to explain all physical phenomena of material, solid, crystal, superconductor, fictitious computer..
Quasiparticles are also "ghost-like" particles with No definite physical shape (= whether a quasiparticle is particle or wave is uncertain, too ), they are expressed as nonphysical, abstract math symbols which tell us nothing about detailed atomic behavior of quasiparticles inside materials.
Dark history of unrealistic quantum mechanics is
A particle or wave is uncertain in quantum mechanics → Many-electron solids or crystals cannot be expressed by real particles or waves. → Unreal quasiparticle and band model must be used to describe physical phenomena in quantum mechanics. ← Science stops progressing now.
In quantum mechanics where a paticle or wave is unknown, each paticle's physical shape and property is unknown, the mechanism of how particles touch and interact with other particles ( or wave ) is unknown, too.
So in quantum mechanics, all particle interactions are expressed as nonphysical, abstract "Feynman diagram" which also tells us nothing about each particle's concrete shape, property and how particles interact with each other. ← physically meaningless.
Feynman diagram always includes ghost-like virtual particle with unreal mass as "virtual mediators" of all interactions and forces.
Quantum mechanics discarded realistic particle picture of all atoms and solid physics, then, its particle physics lacks physical reality, too.
Under unreal virtual and quasiparticle model, all quantum mechanics can do is increase more fictional elementary particles. Unseen quarks with fractional-charge, virtual weak (and Z ) bosons and God-particle Higgs.. are all unobservable, illusory particles which are unnecessary for our daily life.
All these doubtful particles except real electrons and protons are too short-lived to observe directly. ← Isolating those too unstable particles from colliders is much more impossible.
Instead of directly catching new particles, physicsts just "claim" very slight "sign" of illusory quarks, weak boson, Higgs might be detected after just analysing "garbage, meaingless data" of final particles into which unstable illusory particles are said to decay inside particle colliders.
Discovery of new particles (= physicists just claim it with No 'tangible' evidence ) is just meaningless, as long as we are unable to isolate those too unstable particles from colliders to use them in our actual daily life.
Therefore, it's safe to say all these ghost-like virtual particles such as quarks, weak boson and Higgs, which are neither isolated nor directly confirmed, are unreal. We have No troubles even without those ghost-like elementary particles.
Sadly, the only purpose of the current particle physics is to get taxpayers' money for building more meaningless gigantic colliders, which would just destroy environment.
Of course, all those doubtful particles allegedly poping out for only a extremely short time inside colliders have No concrete physical figure, they are expressed just as nonphysical math symbols like other fictitious virtual and quasiparticles.
Quantum mechanics is unphysical → Even whether each object is a particle or wave is uncertatin → Solid physics is disaster relying on unreal quasiparticle and band model with No real physical picture. → No useful physical tools in quantum mechanics. → All the current applied science stops progressing.
→ All particle interactions are expressed using ghost-like virtual particles. → Because the current physics cannot delve into deeper real mechanism using real particles.
→ Physicists started to pursue only illusory particles such as quarks, Higgs, supersymmetry after artificially creating "virtual circumstances" such as colliders, which has nothing to do with our real world.
Particle physicists are allowed to tell lies, saying those fictitious elementary particles might exist only for an extremely short time, using the fact that those ghost-like particles are too short-lived to isolate from colliders. ← Nobody can confirm their true existence, too good to be true.
In the same way, astronomers are allowed to claim (fictional) black hole, worm hole, dark energy, dark matter might be "found" in the very distant universe which is too far away from the earth to confirm.
← Nobody can confirm their true existence, too good to be true.
Quantum mechanics is unreal → Solid-physics is useless filled with unreal quasiparticles → Physicists pursue only "fictional particles" in particle colliders. → Astronomers also pursue fictional black holes, Big Bang, dark energy .. far off in the universe. ← All is illusion.
So the current "science" makes No progress, stuck in fiction in all fields from solid and particle physics to cosmology.
And the final goal of those fictional physics is unified theory or "theory of everything" where physicists just "fantasize" about illusory extra-dimensions, which can never be observed or utilized in our daily life, so meaningless science.
So, quantum mechanics dismissed real particle and wave picture. → Imaginary parallel-worlds theory emerged ← Wasting money in useless parallel-world quantum computer and information, because the current solid-physics relying on unreal quasiparticle model is inapplicable to actual science or medicine.
→ Physicists pursue illusory quarks, virtual particles, Higgs. → Astronomers also pursue fictional black holes, expanding universe, dark matter and energy in vain. →All "science" fields stop progressing now.
In conclusion, the first thing for us to do for advancing "practical science" is to replace nonphysical quantum mechanics by real atomic model based on real particle and wave things with definite physical figure, which can surely explain all actual physical phenomena and solid physics using only real particles and wave without fictitious virtual or quasiparticles.
Otherwise, the current physics is useless and meaningless except for selling "sci-fi" books in amazon or political tools.
See this week physics is still useless.
See previous version of criticizing top journals.
2020/6/19 updated. Feel free to link to this site.