- Criticize top journals. (20/ 8/14)

*(Q-1) ↓ An electron splits into everywhere in *

There are still many deadly, incurable **diseases** in the world.

Cancer is incurable, even the simplest common cold can't be cured.

So the current raging corona virus is much more impossible to eradicate in today's "science" and technology. Why ?

What's the point of today's "education" if science taught in school makes **No** progress, students are just indoctrinated with "science illusion" ?

All humans, cancer cells, viruses are made of "**atoms**".

If today's **only** atomic theory = quantum mechanics could tell us about "atomic behavior" correctly, we could have already eradicated and cured all these deadly diseases and viruses at the "atomic level" safely. But still it cannot.

Because quantum mechanics is doomed to **fail** in explaining atomic behavior in a practical way, it's just getting us nowhere, no matter what physicists try to do based on that "failed" theory . Here we explain why.

*Separating* a real particle from wave is **impossible** for quantum mechanics which can only express each electron as nonphysical wavefunction that can tell us **nothing** about the exact *location* of an electron.

Quantum wavefunction which allegedly means "ambiguous *probability*" of finding an electron in each location, always **spreads** everywhere as ghostly electron cloud.

It means each electron always exists in every place *simultaneously* using **fictional** parallel worlds ( or philosopher's mind ) according to purportedly "state-of-the-art" quantum mechanics ( this p.6 ) which is actually too "**occult**" for any physicists to understand.

The total energy = the sum of electron's kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy (= between an electron and nucleus + between all electrons in multi-electron atoms ) must be always conserved and constant wherever electrons are inside atomic wavefunction.

Schrödinger equation which quantum mechanics tries to solve to find its exact solution (= wavefunction ) giving the **constant** total energy E, is the only way to find electron's allegedly "exact bahavior" inside atom conserving total energy E.

**One**-electron *hydrogen* atom is the **only** atom which can *solve* Schrödinger equation and find exact solution (= wavefunction ) giving the conserved, constant total energy E value = lowest total (= ground-state ) energy E of hydrogen atom becomes **constant** = -13.6 eV ( this p.5 ).

In all other **multi**-electron atoms and molecules, it is impossible to solve Schrödinger equation or find exact solution giving constant total energy E. It means the total energy is **Not** conserved in any "unsolvable" multi-electron atoms in quantum mechanics. ← Quantum mechanics is **false**.

Because in uncanny quantum mechanical electron **cloud**, each electron must exist everywhere, so the distance between two electrons is randomly changeable and **undetermined**, hence, Coulomb potential energy between electrons and total energies are undetermined (= total energy is **Not** constant or conserved in atoms with more than one electrons ).

In multi-electron atoms, for example, helium with **two** electrons, if Schrödinger equation for helium was solvable, and we could luckily find helium exact solution (= it **never** happens, though ), this *imaginary* helium solution (= wavefunction ) would be an "**unrealistic** form" splitting into **three** independent **unreal** hydrogen atoms to cancel three **randomly**-*changeable* Coulomb potential terms for getting constant total energy E, which is **impossible**.

So finding exact solution of multi-electron Schrödinger equation is *intrinsically* **impossible**, no matter what approximate solution physicists try.

All quantum mechanics can do is "choose" **fake** solution called trial function or basis set which can take arbitrary forms (= so, the solution of multi-electron Schrödinger equation is undetermined ), and integrate the whole equation (= putting Schrödinger energy equation H between chosen fake wavefunctions ) to obtain fake total energy, instead of solving it.

There is No limitation to the form of this **chosen** fake solution, so we can choose **any** *arbitrary* forms of fake wavefunctions with freely-adjustable parameters giving any (fake) energy you want.

So all seemingly correct energy values of multi-electron Schrödinger equations in textbooks are just artificially "**chosen**" values which are **Not** obtained by solving Schrödinger equation.

This quantum mechanical *illegitimate* method of artificially **choosing** convenient fake solution is physically **invalid**, useless, can**not** determine or *predict* any true atomic energies (= due to "unsolvable" ), which quantum mechanical deceitful method is a kind of "art" rather than science.

Integrating Schrödinger equation with **fake** wavefunction (= "unsolvable", so can**not** give constant total energy, instead, it includes **many** *different* total energy E values in different electrons' positions ) means the obtained (fake) total energy E is just "**average** expectation value" of a collection of many **different** total energies ( this p.172 ) in different electron's positions.

This expectation (= average ) energy value in multi-electron Schrödinger's atom is just *fake*, **Not** a true conserved or constant *single* total energy E value, because true conserved total energy E must be common and constant in **any** different electron's positions as shown in the solvable hydrogen atom.

The problem is this electron probability wavefunction (= cloud ) can**not** intrinsically bind two atoms to form molecular bond in a normal way using *Coulomb* force as binding force, so quantum mechanics is **false**, again.

In hydrogen atomic wavefunction, electron cloud is always distributed symmetrically and evenly around the central nucleus = the electron's "probability" in **all** directions on the left and right sides ( upper and lower sides ) of the central nucleus is the **same**, as long as the distance between the electron and nucleus is the same.

A negative electron *cloud* distributed symmetrically around the central positive nucleus is equivalent to "symmetrical spherical negative charge" whose Coulomb potential distribution is equal to Coulomb potential around a point-like negatively charged particle located in the **same** position as the **central** positive nucleus (= just like a negative electron cloud and positive nucleus *overlap* each other in the same position ).

So the net charge of a negative electron cloud and positive nucleus *overlapping* in the same position is always *neutral* = **zero**, which cannot generate Coulomb force or bind other atoms for forming molecular bond.

Quantum mechanical wavefunction just "mixes up" electron's particle and de Broglie wave pictures as "**one** *nonphysical* wavefunction" which allegedly means "probability" of finding an electron in each position.

To form hydrogen molecule (= H2 ), a negatively-charged elecron-1 ( of H atom-1 ) has to **approach** the other positively-charged nucleus-2 ( of H atom-2 ), and *avoid* the other negatively-charged electron-2 obeying Coulomb force to lower Coulomb potential energy → lower total energy → stable molecular bond.

To generate this Coulomb attractive force enough to form normal molecular bond, the electron-1 needs to **move** to the **right** *side* of the nucleus-1 and **approach** the other nucleus-2 ( this figure, right real H2 molecule ) to lower Coulomb potential ( or total ) energy.

But quantum mechanical electron "probability" cloud can neither move to one side of a nucleus nor approach the other nucleus, so forming molecular bond by Coulomb attractive force is **impossible** in quantum mechanics !

For the electron cloud to be confined or localized in only one side (= one place ) of the nucleus, the probability wavefunction must be **sharper** and narrower in one particular position where an electron is localized.

The narrower wavefunction to localize an electron only in one particular position means "shorter de Broglie wavelength" which **increases** electron's momentum and kinetic energy drastically, then, the total energy would also increase drastically, **surpass** the experimental value of the actual molecular energy.

Therefore, it is impossible for nonphysical electron's "probability" wavefunction or cloud to move and be localized in one particular place like a realistic moving particle.

Hence, the electron cloud in quantum mechanics must always spread all over the space *symmetrically* around the nucleus, and can**not** approach the other positive nucleus or avoid the other negative electron to generate Coulomb attractive force enough to form molecular bond.

Real Coulomb force can**not** be used (= so lowering Coulomb potential energy → lower total energy → foming molecular bond is impossible ) in quantum mechanics.

The only way left to lower total energy is lowering kinetic energy in an **illegitimate** way **violating** energy conservation law and Virial theorem.

Schrödinger equation for H2 molecule (= consisting of **two** electrons and two nuclei ) is unsolvable. Quantum mechanics often **chooses** two hydrogen (= H ) atomic wavefunctions approximately as **fake** H2 molecule solution.

Quantum mechanics needs to choose the nonphysical form of solution called "(anti-)symmetric wavefuncton" as fake molecular solution where the electron-**1** must always exist in **two** *different* H atoms-1 and 2 *simultaneously* using "**parallel** worlds".

So quantum mechanics discarded the realistic atomic picture where each individual electron belongs to a different atom, and forces all individual electrons originally belonging to different atoms or nuclei to get "**jumbled** up" and indistinguishable, like those uncanny electrons are coexisting in **all** different atoms or places *simultaneously* !

By putting Schrödinger enegy equation H between chosen (anti-)symmetric forms of fake wavefunctions and integrate it, each term of the integral results includes two kinds of strange integral: Coulomb integral and **non**physical "*exchange*" integral ( this p.14 ).

Coulomb integral represents normal Coulomb force or energy where the electron-1 probability is expressed as the product of two identical probability wavefunctions (= φ_{1} (**e _{1}** ) φ

The "exchange" integral is an *unrealistic* and **contradictory** concept, which can**not** be described by any real physical objects ( this p.11 ) on the earth, because this strange "exchange" integral is **different** from the normal electron's probability wavefunction form (= product of two identical wavefunctions ).

This unphysical "exchange integral" is the key "dirty **trick**" to lower kinetic energy **illegitimately** in quantum mechanical (unreal) molecule.

For example, one form of this exchange integral is putting Schrödinger energy equation H between two **different** electron-**1** wavefunctions: one belonging to H atom-1 (= φ_{1} (**e _{1})** ) from the right side and another electron-

The kinetic energy operator (= derivative form ) inside Schrödinger energy equation H acts on the right-side hydrogen atom-1 wavefunction of electron-1 (= kinetic energy derivative inside H acts on φ_{1} (**e _{1}**) of ∫

This hydrogen atom-1 wavefunction (= φ_{1} (**e _{1}**) ) conserves total energy (= electron's kinetic energy + Coulomb potential energy between electron-1 and nucleus-1 )

As the negative electron-1 moves **farther** away from the positive nucleus-1 (= then, Coulomb potential energy becomes higher ) towards the other nucleus-2, the electron-1's kinetic energy is lowered to cancel higher Coulomb potential energy and keep constant (= conserved ) total energy E.

But as the electron-1 moves farther away from the nucleus-1, the electron-1 is **closer** to the other *positive* nucleus-2 and after all, it lowers Coulomb potential energy (= between electron-1 and nucleus-2 ) again. But the electron-1's kinetic energy **remains** *lowered* even when the electron-1 approaches the other nucleus-2 by Coulomb attraction.

So in quantum mechanical unreal H2 molecule, the electron-1's **kinetic** energy keeps **lowering** around the other nucleus-*2*, though Coulomb potential energy between the negative elecron-1 and positive nucleus-2 is also getting **lower** near the nucleus-2. (= total energy = kinetic energy + Coulomb potential energy is **Not** conserved or constant between the electron-1 and nucleus-2 ).

Because around the original nucleus-1, the electron-1's kinetic enrgy is *higher* to cancel **lower** Coulomb potential energy between the electron-1 and nucleus-1, but around the other nucleus-2, the electron-1's kinetic energy keeps **lowering**, even though Coulomb potential energy between the electron-1 and nucleus-2 becomes **lower** (= total energy = kinetic energy + Coulomb potentian energy is **no** longer constant or conserved between around nucleus-1 and around nucleus-2 ).

This means quantum mechanics deliberately allows the electron-1's kinetic energy to **keep** *lowering* even when the electron-1 approaches the other nucleus-2 to lower Coulomb potential energy, **lower** total energy (= no longer constant or conserved ) and generate **fake** molecular bond energy illegitimately (= by keeping lowering kientic energy due to violating total energy conservation ).

To lower the electron-1 kinetic energy (= and then, lower total energy by violating energy conservation law ) further, they need to **expand** this "lower-kinetic-energy area" around the other nucleus-2 using nonphysical exchange integral.

The electron-1 "probability" (= φ_{1} (**e _{1}**) )

So by multiplying lower-kinetic-energy area (= φ** _{1}** (

In quantum mechanics, normal Coulomb force is Not working (= Coulomb attractive force between two atoms surrounded by foggy electron clouds is too **weak** ). Hence, Coulomb (potential) integral is physically meaningless, far **less** influential than unphysical exchange integral in Schrödinger's molecule.

Surprisingly, this "exchange energy" which can**not** be explained by any *real* physical objects, is the **main** generator of (fake) molecular bond energy in quantum mechanics ( this p.3, this p.101-102, this p.15-16, this p.4 Figure.1 ). ← Quantum mechanics is *unrealistic*.

These *ghost*-like "indistinguishable" electrons needed to generate **non**physical "exchange energy" make it **impossible** to use quantum mechanics as a practical basic atomic tool for applied science or nano-technology dealing with many-electron interactions.

For example, when we want to predict chemical reaction at the atomic level, we need to calculate "actual **forces**" between **different** *atoms* to know in which direction each atom will be pulled or pushed by other **different** atoms or electrons.

To calculate actual forces between two different atoms, the first thing we need to do is **determine** and define "*individual* **electron**'s distribution" **specific** to each of two **different** atoms.

But unrealistic quantum mechanics, where all electrons are unreasonably **indistinguishable** losing their own individuality, **forbids** us from *distinguishing* electrons belonging to different kinds of atoms (= each electron is **No** longer specific to the original atom ).

When calculating Coulomb force (= this is useless and too weak to explain molecular bond in quantum mechanics, as I said ) between two different atoms with **different** electron's *distributions*, we need to **define** different individual electron's distribution **specific** to each differently-structured atoms, and then, we need to calculate Coulomb force between the electron-1 specific to atom-1 and electron-2 specific to atom-2.

But quantum mechanics says the electron-1 (= or 2 ) must exist in two **different** atoms *simultaneously* due to unnatural "indistinguishable" rule (= so all electrons always have the same "indistinguishable" distribution spreading over all atoms ), using parallel worlds where we can**not** *separate* individual electron-1 (= atom-1 ) from electron-2 (= atom-2 ), and calculating actual force between inseparable, indistinguishable atom-1 and atom-2 is **impossible**.

Unrealistic electron spin (= spinning faster-than-light !?) was introduced to seemingly explain this unphysical exchange energy which is **inexplicable** by any other *real* physical objects except unreal "spin".

The idea that each electron belongs to different individual atom is meaningless in uncanny quantum mechanics which just **mixes up** all individual atoms and electrons as one **indistinguishable** pseudo-*quasi*-electron model and bogus approximation called density functional theory (= DFT ) or band model.

In this quantum mechanical unphysical material where a distinguishable individual electron No longer exists, physicists have to rely on "unreal **quasiparticle** model" with **fictitious** (= effective ) mass ( which mass can be unrealistically negative ! ) and charge to explain all many-electron physical phenomena such as superconductor, semiconductor, graphenes and solar cells.

Now all physicists **blindly** try to use unrealistic **one**-*pseudo*-electron approximate calculation method called DFT ( this p.3 ) to compute (**fake**) energy in many-electron materials such as semiconductor and proteins.

DFT approximate quantum method emerged as the new **savior** of *useless* quantum mechanics which can**not** treat **many**-electron materials due to its unrealistically "indistinguishable" ghost-like electrons (= cloud ). But in fact, this DFT has **nothing** to do with reality or even the original quantum mechanics.

Because DFT forcibly replaced the whole "many different electrons" (= electrons are indistinguishable and impractical also in original Schrödinger equation ) by only one single *pseudo*-electron model.

In one-pseudo-electron DFT model, the so-called (anti-)symmetric description ( which needs **many** ghost-like indistinguishable electrons ) by quantum mechanics is impossible, so computing nonphysical exchange ( or Coulomb ) energy integral is impossible in DFT, too.

So DFT replaced the original Coulomb potential and unphysical exchange energy by **unrelated** non-interacting *pseudo*-potential called "exchange-correlation functional" which has nothing to do with real world or original quantum mechanical "exchange energy", despite their confusing similar name (= "exchange" ).

The correct form of this pseudo-potential energy in DFT, which has nothing to do with real objects, is unknown, so this pseudo-exchange potential energy form has to be artificially chosen from among **infinite** possible choices.

It means DFT method is intrinsically useless, and always **fails** ( this p.17 ), DFT can**not** predict any physical values due to its **unknown**, undetermined, nonphysical "exchange" pseudo-potential.

The problem is this quantum mechanical unreal quasiparticle model and one-pseudo-electron DFT approximate calculation method is the only "**point** of **contact**" between all the current unrealistic physics originating from quantum mechanics 100 years ago and actual physical phenomena, accoding to today's "mainstream" science.

So as long as physicists **refuse** to replace this *unrealistic* quantum mechanical model by other more practical theory, it is **impossible** for us to make any progress in applied science such as medicine and nanotechnology which is necessary to utilize microscopic atomic behavior and real atomic "forces" for practical use and curing diseases forever.

For example, the current Einstein cosmology is devoted to **imaginary** wormhole, extra-dimensions, black hole and tries to find evidence of **fictional** parallel universes by staring at *irrelevant* cosmic microwave background in vain.

The only "**point** of **contact**" between this fictional Einstein *cosmology* and real world is said to be GPS clock time correction.

But there **are** many other realistic factors such as *atmosphere* which can cause GPS time error in various ways, so distinguishing the sources of very tiny sensitive clock time errors is almost **impossible**.

Actually, GPS clock time needs to be corrected almost *real-time* by **comparing** it with ground-station's clocks on the earth, **regardless** of whether tiny Einstein relativistic effect is true or not. So Einstein's tiny, tiny relativistic effect is easily **hidden** in various other large factors.

Hence, Einstein relativity is intrinsically useless, meaningless in GPS time correction.

When we can consider different factors such as atmosphere besides Einstein relativity in GPS time error, the "differential diagnosis" to find which theory includes **fatal** *flaw* or paradox is necessary.

Einstein relativity always includes **fatal** paradoxes of time where we can **never** know which moving satellite's clock runs slower, so Einstein relativity with self-**contradiction** is *false* and safely **excluded** from the source of GPS time error.

It means there is **No** realistic "point of contact" between all other Einstein fictional cosmology and our real world. Hence, Einstein theory has **nothing** to do with real physical phenomena.

Also in the current fictional particle physics and CERN, physicists just "*imagine*" **illusory** unstable particles (= directly **un**detectable ) only inside their heads or inside "virtual circumstances" (= **isolated** from real world ) such as particle colliders.

As long as particle physicists can**not** take those doubtful ghost-like, illusive particles out of virtual colliders into the real world for practical use, there is **No** realistic "point of contact" between these current **useless** particle physics and actual world (= outside of collider ).

So today's particle physics is **dead**-end, going nowhere, and gigantic colliders are just a *waste* of taxpayers' money = meaningless except for bloggers

Quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) is false, because **unreal** virtual particles are originally self-**contradictory**.

Actually, there is **No** "*point of contact*" between real world and unphysical QED or virtual particles which No current physicists utilize in practical science or daily life.

Because all QED can do is said to predict *imaginary* **infinite** bare charge or infinite bare mass of an electron allegedly surrounded by infinite amounts of *unreal* ghost-like **virtual** particles, both of which are **unobservable**, unmeasurable, hence, physically meaningless.

So QED, which tries to "predict" *unobservable* **infinity** values by artificial tricks called "renormalization", is physically meaningless, too ( this p.4 ).

It is safe to say very tiny physical values such as g-factor or Lamb shift can be caused by some other **realistic** factors such as multi-charged particles' tiny fluctuating motion or something, **without** *unreal* virtual particles or meaningless unobservable QED infinity.

Anyway, the only "**point** of **contact**" between actual physical phenomena and the current *fictional* physics such as quantum mechanics, particle physics, QED virtual particle is **unreal** quasiparticle model and unphysical one *pseudo*-electron DFT method originating from unrealistically indistinguishable ghost-like quantum mechanical electron cloud.

So unless we replace this current unrealistic "point of contact" between actual physical phenomena and basic atomic theory by other realistic one, utilizing atomic bahavior for practical science or curing deadly diseases would be just a **pipe** dream forever.

Realistic atomic theory **must** use **real** "*distinguishable*" moving electrons, and of course, real Coulomb "forces" is essential as a practical atomic tool to explain actual larger molecules and physical phenomena.

Unfortunately, this realistic atomic model was impossible in 1920s when there were **No** modern computers to calculate *dynamic* complicated **multi**-electron motions, which was extremely difficult three-body problem.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(P-1) ↓ Photoelectric effect = electron absorbs "virtual" * *?*

Einstein's famous photoelectric effect is said to prove light can behave like a particle called a "*photon*".

But the photoelectric effect has **nothing** to do with fantasy "photon".

It just demonstrated an electron *absorbing* **light** with "short wavelength" (= hence, **wave** nature of light ! ) is ejected from an atom.

The truth is that it is physically **impossible** for an *electron* to absorb or emit a **real** *photon* in photoelectric effect. So Einstein is false.

We all know the total energy E (= the sum of kinetic + potential energies of all particles ) is always **conserved**.

At the same time, the total momentum p (= product of a particle's mass m times its velocity v ) is always conserved, too.

Photoelectric effect says when an electron at rest (= kinetic energy is zero ) absorbs a photon with energy E, the electron's kinetic energy increases by exactly the same amount E as the photon's energy the electron absorbs, and the 'juiced up' electron starts to **move**.

According to the total energy *conservation* law, the magnitude of the incoming photon energy E must be just **equal** to the magnitude of the resultant kinetic energy E of the electron which absorbs the whole photon.

The total *momentum* must be **conserved**, too. So the incoming photon's momentum p must be equal to the resultant electron's momentum p_{e} ( p = p_{e} ).

But this *momentum* can **never** be conserved, though it **must** be conserved according to the physical principle.

Because the **ratio** (= E/p ) of energy (= E ) to momentum (= p ) is **different** between the photon and the electron, which fact makes it impossible to conserve *both* energy and momentum at the same time.

The incoming *photon*'s momentum (= p ) is equal to the photon's energy E divided by the photon (= light ) speed c ( *p* = **E**/*c* ).

The momentum (= p_{e} = mv ) of the resultant **electron** absorbing photon's energy E is equal to 2E divided by the electron's speed v ( **p _{e}** = 2

The light speed *c* is much **higher** than the electron's speed **v** ( *c* > **v** ), so the photon's *momentum* p is much **smaller** than the electron's momentum p_{e} ( *p* < **p _{e}** ), when their energy E is the same. ← The total momentum between photon and electron is

As a result, it is **impossible** to *conserve* **both** total energy and momentum in Einstein photoelectric effect where an electron absorbing a photon obtains kinetic energy and escapes from an atom. ← Einstein's *photon* **violates** basic physical rule (= energy-momentum conservation ), so **unreal**.

Einstein ad-hoc relativistic theory dismissed the existence of "*medium*" filling space. So the **space** constains "**nothing**" according to Einstein.

In this Einstein **empty** space, there are neither 'guideposts' nor beacons which tell us where and how fast each particle is actually moving on the "blank" space map.

So in Einstein's uncanny space, there is **no** such thing as "**absolute**" *space*. All things are "relative", any physical properties such as velocity and kinetic energy are **un**determined and *varying*, seen by different observers.

An **electron** at rest (= ① in upper figure ) absorbs a photon, acquires kinetic energy and starts to move with speed v (= ② ) rightward seen by an observer at rest with respect to the stationary electron ①.

But seen by **another** *observer* **moving** with speed v rightward (= lower part in this figure ), the initial electron ① **appears** to be moving leftward (= instead of 'at rest' ) at speed v, and then **stop** *after* **absorbing** a photon **energy**. ← This supernatural phenomenon can **never** happen in real world.

Because this moving observer witnesses *paradoxical* situation where an electron, which should **increase** its (kinetic) energy after *absorbing* photon energy, does the '**opposite** thing' = **decreases** its kinetic energy and **stops** after obtaining the photon's energy E (= ② in lower part of this figure ) !

This *paradoxical* situation is caused by Einstein's unrealistically "**empty**" space or "blank" map.

In fact, the electron's kinetic energy and momentum are intrinsically "**relative**" concepts with respect to "other **external** things" such as "*medium*" or "beacon" interacting with electron.

Therefore, there is **No** such thing as "*absolute* kinetic energy" or momentum. The situation where an electron "actually has" some amount of kinetic energy ( or momentum ) in the completely **empty** space is **impossible**.

So in the *empty* space favored by Einstein relativity, it is **impossible** for an electron to absorb a photon, "obtain" new (kinetic) energy and momentum in photoelectric effect. ← This sounds strange, but it is true.

As a result, the current physics "gave up *reality*", and started to say an electron cannot emit a real photon, only "unreal virtual photon" can "*supernaturally*" interact with an electron in photoelectric effect and electromagnetic force.

Physicists use **non**physical, abstract Feynman diagram to describe interaction between electrons and photons.

In this Feynman diagram, both energy and momentum must be conserved.

Using this energy-momentum conservation law and Einstein relativistic equation, we find virtual photon (= absorbed or emitted by an electron ) must have **un**physical "imaginary" mass (= virtual photon's *mass squared* can unrealistically become **negative**, m^{2} < 0, this p.3 ).

This virtual photon is obviously a self-**contradictory** concept, and shows Einstein relativistic "*photon*" is **wrong**, does **Not** really exist, because virtual photon cannot satisfy Einstein relativistic energy-momentum equation ( this p.5 ).

So Einstien's **photon** is just literally '**virtual**' without reality.

Photoelectric effect described by the current quantum mechanics and Einstein must rely on this "**unreal** virtual particles", hence all the current *mainstream* theories **lack** reality due to their inherent fatal self-**contradiction**.

All phenomena such as light interference, refraction, "light wavelength change" in Compton scattering show light is actually "**wave**" traveling through some "medium".

So all the actually measured physical properties such as wavelength, energy, momentum of light, sound, electron's de Broglie wave are generated with respect to interacting with some "**external** *medium*" as "beacon", instead of Einstein's absolute empty space or blank map.

If we believe in Einstein's ad-hoc theory where there is no such thing as "real medium" in space, a **single** electron has to pass through **two** slits *simultaneously* to inferfere with itself using *illusory* parallel worlds.

**Without** real medium in space, it causes "de Broglie wave **paradox**".

A stationary observer actually sees de Broglie wave interference of an electron, while another observer moving at the **same** speed as an electron, the electron's speed **v** appears to be **zero**, = No electron's de Broglie wave(length) is generated, hence, electron's de Broglie wave interference pattern appears to **disapper** or reappear seen by a moving or a stationary observer. ← Einstein paradox !

Physicists just *roughly* treat "light wave" with energy enough to kick out an electron from an atom as a **fictitious** "*photon*" **without** specifying any detailed shape or size of an imaginary single photon.

In uncanny quantum mechanics, each electron always has to **spread** all over space as "electron *probability* **cloud**" mixing up electron's particle and wave pictures as one **non**physical wavefunction.

So the clear separation of a "particle" from "wave" is **impossible** in quantum mechanics, where an electron particle exists everywhere simultaneously using its nonphysical "probability" wave nature = **fictional** parallel worlds.

Inside this strange quantum mechanical **foggy** electron cloud, an electron cannot realistically avoid other negative electrons or approach other positive nuclei. ← Coulomb force is **Not** normally working, ← distance between electrons is disorderly, random ← Total energy can **Not** be conserved ← Hence, finding exact solutions which give conserved (= constant ) total energy value E in Schrödinger equation of any multi-electron atoms is **impossible**.

So unrealistic quantum mechanical electron cloud has to rely on some "**dirty** tricks" to generate (**fake**) molecular bond energy by violating total energy conservation law and lowering kinetic energy illegitimately, because real Coulomb force is unavailable .

To treat atomic, molecular structures and Coulomb forces realistically (= without relying on quantum mechanical parallel worlds ), we need to separate an electron "**particle**" from its de Broglie "*wave*" generated in the "*medium*" around the electron.

Unfortunately, this realistic atomic model which must calculate complicated, dynamic **multi**-electron motions (= three-body problem ) was impossible in 1920s when there were **No** modern computers and physicists had no choice but to accept unrealistic quantum mechanical model.

If an electron tries to absorb or emit a photon (= a particle of light ) in the Einstein **empty** space, this photon must be an **unreal** *virtual* **photon** with nonphysical *imaginary* mass, when the total energy and momentum are conserved between the electron and the fictitious photon.

Hence, the only realistic solution is a **real** electron needs to absorb or emit "light **wave**" through *friction* against the external "medium" around the electron to conserve total momentum and energy safely **without** relying on self-contradictory virtual photon.

When an orbital length of a moving electrons is not an integer times de Broglie wavelength, an electron **crashes** into its destructive de Broglie wave (= friction against the surrounding medium ) and **loses** energy, *emitting* electromagnetic **wave** in the direction *perpendicular* to the initial electron moving (= crashing ) direction.

Each electron is orbiting around a heavy nucleus, bound by nuclear positive charge (= so the total momentum of an electron **and** a nucleus bound together is always almost **zero**, regardless of their total energy values ).

The "crashing energy" between a moving electron and its destructive de Broglie wave (= these two crashing things have about the same magnitude of momentum, move in the opposite direction and crash into each other, so their resultant total momentum is zero ) is stored as medium's "potential ( spring-like ) energy" which soon becomes the "oscillating energy" in the **transverse** (= crashing ) direction (= this energy is detected by **photo-electric** effect ).

This crashing energy oscillating in the transverse direction is **pushed out** from the point where an moving electron crashes into the opposite de Broglie wave in the perpendicular direction (= *longitudinal* = light traveling direction in which momentum is detected by *Compton* scattering ) as "electromagnetic wave".

This resultant light wave has **small** *momentum* in longitudinal (= light traveling ) direction, and **high** oscillating *energy* in the transverse (= electron's crashing ) direction, which is compatible with light's high energy compared to low momentum, hence, **safely** conserves both energy and momentum in interaction with an electron with different ratio of energy to momentum.

So using real moving electrons, de Broglie wave generated around them and light wave actually traveling in the medium with various wavelength, we can explain all atomic bahavior **without** self-**contradiction**, quantum mechanical parallel-worlds or paradoxical *virtual* photons.

But as long as the obsolete useless quantum mechanics is used, physicists have to rely on **unreal** quasiparticle model, faster-than-light spin and bogus one-electron DFT approximation, whenever they treat many-electron materials or solid-physics to interpret the measured physical phenomena.

And physicists needed to make up "**illusory** scientific goals" such as parallel-world quantum computer, information, God-particle, nonphysical symmetry to deceive governments and continue to get research fund from taxpayers' money, while the current old-fashioned school system is 'harmful' rather than beneficial, indoctrinating students with fake science.

QED method using these **unreal** virtual particles is used **only** for *negligibly* **tiny** values such as g-factor and Lamb shift which are too small to be useful for our daily life, so **meaningless** scientific area.

Actually, **No** current physicists use this *useless* QED with virtual photons in practical science or daily life. ← It means it is safe to say all these ad-hoc QED tricks are **unnecessary**, unreal and can be replaced by (= incorporated into ) other more general and realistic explanation or theory.

We have **No** trouble even if there were No virtual particles (= which just include self-**contradiction**, so *false* ) and ad-hoc QED interpretation of negligibly tiny values is **replaced** by other more **realistic** factors such as some "artifact" or multi-charged particles' tiny fluctuating motion without unreal virtual particles.

QED calculation results always diverge to "infinity" due to infinite unreal virtual particles' effect ( this p.4 ). So it just *artificially* **subtracts** "*arbitrary* **infinity**" from the "infinite calculation result" by illegitimate **tricks** called "renormalization" to get meaninglessly tiny (= freely-adjustable by QED trick ) physical values which are useless in our daily life.

Even founders criticized this ad-hoc QED renormalization method forcibly removing "**infinity**" as "hocus-pocus" and it must be fundamentally changed, admitting fatal **flaws** inherent in QED virtual particles.

Physics professors turned into "pseudo-political analysts", science-fiction writers to sell only "literature" books, pursuing illusory "theory of everything" with unreal extradimensions, forgetting practical use of real "physics". Because there is **No** longer "reality" in the current physics.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(S-1) ↓ Unreal virtual photon, parallel worlds by *

All students are probably taught "energy conservation law" as one of the most important and fundamental physical rules in schools.

Any real objects in this universe have to **obey** this basic physical principle, because energy is neither created out of nothing nor vanishes like a '*ghost*'.

According to this physical law, the sum of the particle's kinetic energy and potential energy is the **total** *energy* which must be always conserved and constant.

But in fact, the current *mainstream* science = Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics blatantly **defy** this basic physical law, meaning their theories are **false**.

This is why "theory of everything" combining Einstein and quantum mechanics embraces fantasy unseen dimensions, and colleges **deceive** students, saying "you need (**unreal**) extra-dimensions".

Physicists use their *pseudo*-science and universities only for selling "literature" books, worshiping Einstein's ancient legacy and history as "religion", their impractical extra-dimensions were exploited even by sex-offender Epstein.

All of the so-called "Einstein's tests"
can be safely **replaced** by other more *realistic* theory or interpretation, **invalidating** Einstein relativity.

The current **only** practical use of Einstein relativity (= which effect is usually negligibly **small**, so physically **meaningless** ) is said to be GPS time where stronger gravity makes clocks run more slowly in Einstein's *wonder*land ?

But there are many **other** *realistic* and powerful factors such as "atmospheric pressure" affecting very sensitive GPS atomic clocks than Einstein's fantasy time dilation.

"Atmospheric pressure" and other physical **circumstances** are completely **different** in areas causing different magnitude of gravitational force which is probably transmitted by some "medium". All these "circumstance" *difference* related to different gravitational area could **naturally** affect sensitive clock time slightly which could be **mis**interpreted as Einstein pseudo-physics.

So in order to decide whether GPS clock time error is caused by Einstein spooky time dilation or other more realistic factors such as different atmospheric and physical "circumstances" in different gravitational areas, we have to conduct some "**differential** diagnosis" to discriminate the right from wrong theories.

In fact, Einstein relativity includes serious self-contradiction in the paradoxical situation where moving clocks appear to run slower seen by stationary observer. Hence, "differential diagnosis" can simply tell us Einstein theory is **false**.

In two satellites orbiting around the earth in the opposite directions, the satellite A clock appears to be moving, hence, run slower seen by the other satellite B, and **simultaneously**, the satellite B clock appears to be moving, hence, run slower seen by the satellite A. ← Which satellite clock runs slower A or B is **uncertain** and *paradoxical*.

Differential diagnosis → The same physical phenomenon (= slight GPS clock time error ) can be explained by two different theories (= Einstein time dilation or atmospheric, **circumstance** difference ) → **Only** Einstein relativistic theory includes fatal *paradox*, so Einstein theory is **false** and excluded.

Conclusion → GPS clock time error is caused by other more **realistic** factors (= different atmospheric or *medium* pressure ) related to different gravitational area, Not caused by Einstein 'fairy-tale' theory.

So to **dispove** a theory, we need to simply find an "*evidence* **against** the theory" or expose some obvious "self-**contradiction**" accompanying such a pseudo-theory.

By this golden rule of providing a "counter-evidence" or "self-contradiction", we can **disprove** *both* quantum mechanics and Einstein relativistic theory here.

Einstein counter-intuitive relativistic theory began by *dismissing* "real medium" in space, so his theory argues the space is "completely **empty**", contains **nothing** !

In this "**empty** space", how can particles **transmit** actual "*forces*" such as electric or gravitational forces that can reach and affect distant objects ?

Surprisingly, Einstein theory says all forces are mediated by **illusory** virtual particles with **non**physical imaginary mass which **contradicts** Einstein mc^{2} relation ( this p.3 ). ← Einstein theory is "self-**contradictory**" in describing *forces*.

Forces such as electric and gravity **cover** almost **all** space = very **large** area, these forces can reach even very distant area from the source particle of forces. ← A electron (= source of elecric force ) always emits an incredibly **large** number of (unreal) **virtual** particles enough to cover **all** '*empty*' space in all directions ? ← Unbelievable.

This poor electron would soon run out of stored virtual particles, all of which are emitted into 'empty' space ! ← No more electric force ? So the current theory **gave up** 'reality', and saying these virtual particles do Not really exist. ← "*Forces*" really exist, but their **mediator** = "virtual particles" do **Not** exist ? ← self-**contradiction**.

Light interference in two-slit experiment obviously proves the light is "wave" transmitted through some "*medium*" like sound and water waves.

Einstein's hypothetical photon (= a particle of light ? ) can**not** explain why the light speed **changes** in different light "medium", which can be explained only by light **wave** theory (= Huygens ) in the same way as sound wave traveling through different *medium*.

There is **No** conclusive evidence that the light is a particle called "photon."

Physicists can **never** tell us "how **big**" and "what **shape**" a single **photon** is, though if the light is a particle, the light must have its **definite** shape and size. ← Einstein *photon* theory is self-*contradictory* in explaining the "photon's **figure**" and property.

Famous Einstein photoelectric effect just showed the energy of light is **proportional** to the "light frequency" (= reciprocal of wavelength, so this photoelectric effect demonstrates **wave** nature of light ! ), **Not** providing a single evidence of a particle nature of light.

The so-called "photon detector" just detects "electrons" ejected by light **wave** (= can**not** directly detect a photon particle ) through photoelectric effect. ← still **No** evidence of a "photon particle".

Physicists just roughly **interpret** the "light wave" with enough **energy** to eject an electron from an atom as a *fictitious* particle photon, **without** revealing any concrete "figure" of a photon particle or detailed mechanism of how a photon "interacts" with an electron in photoelectric effect.

Radio wave is one of light wave with extremely long wavelength = 30000 meters. ← If this radio wave is also a "photon particle", this photon particle size must be unrealistically as big as 30000 meters ! ← No one has ever found such a **big** photon "particle".

Compton scattering just demonstrated the "light wavelength" (= **wave** nature of light ) changes, when the light loses energy being scattered by an electron. ← If the light is a photon **particle**, the photon's **speed** (= instead of light **wave**length ) must be changed by losing energy in scattering.

But light speed is always **constant** c ( in the same *medium* ) regardless of the light energy or wavelength, which is another conclusive evidence that the light is "**wave**" traveling through medium like sound wave (= constant speed regardless of its wavelength ), Not a particle.

The current physical theory says a real electron cannot emit or absorb a real photon. ← So if an electron actually "absorbs" a photon particle in **photo**electric effect, this photon must be "**unreal** *virtual* photon". ← Einstein's photon view **contradicts** "reality", again.

Particle's momentum (= p ) is defined as the product of the particle's **mass** (= m ) times its velocity (= v ), which means if the particle's mass is **zero**, its momentum must be always **zero**, too ( p = mv = 0, if m = 0 ).

But Einstein relativity blatantly **defies** this basic physical law, and claims a photon has No mass, but has its momentum. ← Einstein **contradicts** the original definition of "momentum".

The fact that light wave has momentum was first proved by Maxwell's *classical* electromagnetic **wave** theory without photons. Later, Einstein **copied** Maxwell **wave** theory as a **wrong**, modified version introducing a **fictitious** photon particle.

Einstein famous energy relation mc^{2} was demonstrated using "nuclear energy" which is a kind of potential energy (= **Not** particle's relativistic kinetic energy proposed by Einstein original mc^{2} ).

"Potential energy or *forces*" caused **around** particles needs the existence of some "real **medium**" affecting *distant* particles and mass, so nuclear potential energy (= as big as mc^{2} ) stored in the "surrounding *medium*" **around** particles **contradicts** Einstein relativistic theory dismissing medium.

Relativistic quantum field theory incorporating Einstein theory describes "nuclear strong force" as exchange of "**non**physical *virtual* gluons" (= one of **unreal** virtual particles ) between imaginary fractional-charge quarks, **without** showing any more detailed mechanism of how virtual gluons touch or interacts with particles.

This nuclear *potential* energy stored in "*medium*" around particles was also first proposed by Maxwell's classical electromagnetic **wave** theory, and later Einstein **copied** and modified the original Maxwell's mc^{2} theory in the **wrong** way ( realistic light wave in Maxwell → **unreal** *virtual* particles in Einstein ).

Einstein theory needs **fictitious** virtual photons with unreal imaginary mass to explain all forces and their potential energies such as nuclear and Coulomb. ← Einstein relativistic theory **defies** "reality", again.

In photoelectric effect, an electron can never emit or absorb a real photon, because the **ratio** of energy to momentum is completely **different** between a lighter photon and a heavier electron.

Both total energy and momentum must be always **conserved**.

When an electron absorbs a photon with the energy E, the electron also absorbs the photon's momentum p according to conservation law.

But the **ratio** (= E/p ) of energy E to momentum p possessed by each particle is **different** between a photon and an electron, indicating an electron can**not** absorb the same amount of both energy and momentum of a photon simultaneously. ← Conserving both total energy and momentum between an electron and a photon is **impossible**.

So if an electron can absorb a *photon*, **conserving** both total energy and momentum, this photon must be always **unreal** *virtual* photon having imaginary mass (= virtual photon mass squared m^{2} < 0 ).

Therefore, virtual particles purported to be a mediator of all forces **contradicts** the most important and basic physical law (= conservation of energy and momentum ) taught in schools !

To avoid these unreal virtual photons, an electron must emit ( or absorb ) energy through some "**friction**" against the *medium*, which already exists around the electron, instead of a electron itself emitting ( or absorbing ) new imaginary virtual photons from the electron's inside into the empty vacuum.

When an moving electron (= de Broglie wave ) crashes into the *medium* around the electron and loses its kinetic energy, the electromagnetic wave is generated and pushed out in the direction **perpendicular** to the initial electron's moving direction.

This newly-generated electromagnetic light wave **stores** the kinetic energy the electon lost by crashing against the surrounding medium in the **transverse** direction (= parallel to the electron's moving direction ) as "oscillating energy" and the light momentum detected by Compton scattering is expressed in the *longitudinal* direction (= in which the light travels being pushed out, perpendicular to the electron's moving direction ).

This realistic light wave model generated by "crash" between an electron and the already-existing surrounding **medium** includes **No** self-contradiction as to energy and momentum conservation law, and of course, does **Not** need to rely on unreal virtual photon with imaginary mass accompanying Einstein relativistic theory.

Even a **single** particle such as an electron is known to **interfere** with *itself* in two-slit experiment.

If Einstein was right and the space is **empty** except a single electron, the electron must unrealistically split into "multiple parallel universes" and pass through two slits *simultaneously* for a **single** particle to *interfere* with **itself**.

If the space contains real "medium", it can **naturally** and realistically explain two-slit experiment where an single electron causes *de Broglie* **wave** around it, which wave interferes with itself and affects the motion of an electron which just passes through only **one** slit without splitting into fantasy parallel worlds.

The Earth is **spinning** very *fast*, but all things on the earth such as humans and atmosphere rotate at exactly the "**same** velocity" as the earth, so we don't feel the "wind caused by the earth rotation" which could easily blow us away.

If there was only "gravitational force defined by Einstein" pulling us towards the earth's **center** in the **vertical** direction ( without any 'medium' dragging us in the horizontal direction ), we and atmosphere would be rotating at completely **different** speeds from the spinning earth in the horizontal direction, and it could always cause strong 'earth wind' against us, but such a strange wind does Not happen.

It means all things on the earth are being "dragged" by some '*medium*' (= moving with the earth, hence, this dragged "medium" can explain constant light speed shown in Michelson-Morley experiment ) in the same **horizontal** direction as the earth rotation.

Einstein's unrealistically '**empty**' space can**not** explain actual phenomena where all things on the earth are always being 'dragged' by the spinning earth in same **horizontal** direction.

Hypothetical dark matter is said to interact only with gravity. But if the gravity is the only driving force, the dark matter objects would show exactly the same "**Keplerian** motion" as solar system (= dark matter would attract each other through gravity, forming "dark matter stars orbiting around other dark matter stars" like solar system, if dark matter is governed by "gravity" ).

But galaxy rotation is completely **different** from Keplerian motion caused by ordinary gravity, indicating "dark matter" is also a kind of "*medium*" filling space, **dragging** all stars at the **same** speed in the same *horizontal* direction in galaxy rotation.

In fact, the physical reason for all observed "atomic *quantized* **energy** levels" also needs the existence of "real *medium*".

In all atoms and molecules, the sum of electron's kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy is the total energy, which must be always **conserved** and constant, wherever the electron is inside the atomic wavefunction.

For this atomic total energy to be **determined** as the single *definite* value (= each atom and molecule has its unique definite ground state (= lowest ) energy. ex. hydrogen atom's lowest total energy is always -13.6 eV ), the average **distance** (= orbital radius ) between the electron and nucleus must take a definite and constant value.

If there is only Coulomb electric force influencing these atomic energy levels, an negatively-charged electron would be easily attracted and falling into a positively- charged nuclues **unlimitedly**, quickly shrinking the electron's orbital radius and lowering its total energy unlimitedly (= atomic lowest total energy can go down and down to *minus* **infinity** ! )

But such a strange thing does Not happen. Hydrogen atomic lowest energy can**not** be lower than -13.6 eV, by keeping the *definite* "**distance**" between an electron and a nucleus against Coulomb attraction between them.

So there must be some **other** 'external factors' or physical *things* which constantly **keep** an electron from falling into a nucleus **against** their Coulomb attraction. ← If the space contains nothing as Einstein says, there's "**nothing**" to keep electrons from falling into nucleus in "empty" space. ← self-contradiction, again !

Classical Bohr atomic model successfully explained the experimental results of hydrogen-like atomic energy levels, gave exactly the same results as Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics.

Because both quantum mechanics and Bohr model use exactly the **same** physical **principle** of "Coulomb potential energy" and "de Broglie wave theory".

The electron's de Broglie wave was experimentally confirmed and its de Broglie wavelength is known to be inversely proportional to the electron's momentum or kinetic energy.

When the electron's orbital length is "an integer times de Broglie wavelength" (= related to electron's kinetic energy ), the total energy values and the electron's average orbital radius can be determined as **definite** values *specific* to each atom.

Schrödinger's equation of quantum mechanics 'tacitly' uses the **same** condition (= orbital length is an integer times de Broglie wavelength ) as Bohr's orbit, which is why both Schrödinger's and Bohr's atomic models give exactly the **same** definite energy values in all hydrogen-like atoms.

When the orbital length is an **integer** times de Broglie *wavelength*, it does Not cause "destructive interference" of electron's de Broglie wave, making the electron's motion **stable**.

What causes "destructive interference" of electron's de Broglie wave to decide whether or not to kick out the electron from the orbit ? ← If the space contains nothing except for an electron and nucleus, there is '**nothing** else' to push out the electron by destructive interference.

So Einstein's "*empty* space" can**not** explain the determination of atomic energy levels which needs some other external factors causing destructive interference of electron's de Broglie wave.

This source of de Broglie wave interference affecting the electron's motion or determining its orbital radius (= hence, energy levels ) is some "medium", which Einstein relativity illegitimately ditched 100 years ago.

Quantum mechanical hydrogen atom always includes **unreal** "zero orbital angular momentum", meaning an electron always crashes into a nucleus and its linear orbital motion (= due to zero angular momentum ) always causes destructive interference of electron's de Broglie wave, making the electron's motion **unstable**. ← Quantum mechanical atomic model is unstable and **contradictory** to actual stable atoms, so false.

Textbooks often mention unphysical "uncertainty principle" as a reason why an electron doesn't fall into a nucleus, **without** showing any detailed underlying physical mechanism keeping an electron from falling into a nucleus. "Uncertain principle" just means some "**uncertain** state" literally, **Not** specifying any physical objects at all.

So quantum mechanics deliberately **avoids** finding some "realistic physical objects" which actually keep an electron from falling into a nucleus against Coulomb attraction between an electron and a nucleus.

Quantum mechanics determines hydrogen's energy values by "**solving** Schrödinger equation" which consists of an electron's kinetic (= expressed as de Broglie wavelength ) and Coulomb potential energy.

But Schrödinger equations of any other **multi**-electron atoms or molecules cannot be solved. It means quantum mechanics has **No** way to **determine** the definite *evergy* values in **multi**-electron atoms or molecules. ← Quantum mechanics is useless and inconsistent with actual physical phenomena.

Schrödinger equation often chooses **fake** approximate solution consisting of hydrogen atomic wavefunctions with freely adjustable parameters in unsolvable multi-electron atoms. ← *Choosing* **arbitrary** fake solution means quantum mechanics is just an "art" rather than "science", hence this unscientific quantum mechanics can**not** predict any physical values.

Quantum mechanical **un**physical wavefunction is said to mean a vaguely-spreading "electron cloud" showing artificially-introduced concept = ad-hoc "probability" of finding an electron in various places.

Different from Bohr's realistic atomic model which clearly **separates** an "electron **particle**" from "de Broglie **wave** "generated in the *medium* surrounding the electron, Schrödinger wavefunction just roughly "mixes up" electron's particle and de Broglie wave as one nonphysical, indistinguishable wavefunction.

The *probability* of finding an electron in any position represented by Schrödinger wavefunction's *amplitude* is **Not** zero, which means a **single** electron must alwasys exist **every**where **all** over the space simultaneously using parallel worlds in a wacky quantum mechanical atom.

This electron "**cloud**" jumbling up a particle and wave picture of quantum mechanics poses serious **problems** especially in multi-electron atoms.

Because two electrons's clouds (= always **spreading** all over place ) cannot avoid each other even if electrons constantly try to repel each other by Coulomb repulsion between electrons (= so Coulomb force is Not normally working in strange quantum mechanics ).

In realistic atomic model (= ③ and ④ in the upper figure ), two electrons (= localized point-like particles ) can be always **moving** into some particular places so that those electrons can clearly **avoid** other electrons (= so these "real" moving electrons can always keep 'definite **distance**' between two repulsive electrons ).

Keeping some 'definite distance' between electrons by particle-like electrons constantly moving and avoiding each other means this realistic atomic model can keep the definite Coulomb potential energy, hence, conserve total energy even in multi-electron atoms.

Unfortunately, calculating these realistic electrons constantly moving and avoiding by Coulomb forces between moving particles needs modern computers (= because this calculation is complicated three-body problem ), which did Not exist in 1920s when physicists had No choice but to accept unrealistic quantum mechanics.

This **realistic** atomic model where two negative electrons can **move**, approach the other positive nuclei, avoiding other nagative electrons can generate *powerful* Coulomb attractive **force** between atoms enough to form stable molecular bonds. ← physically **consistent** theory

But in quantum mechanical atom, each electron must always exist **every**where simultaneously (= defined by electron uncanny "probability" cloud spreading all space ), so two electrons can **ignore** Coulomb repulsive force, approach (= ② ) and move far away (= ① ) from each other at the **same** time using parallel worlds, like a *ghost*.

So in a quantum mechanical hydrogen (= H2 ) molecule, the distance between two electrons can take any "**random** and arbitrary value" (= **Not** determined as the definite value, hence, Coulomb repulsive **energy** between two electrons can take any **random** and arbitrary values, too ). ← Total energy of the quantum mechanical atom or molecule is **Not** determined or conserved as the single definite value.

Therefore, quantum mechanical atom or molecule **violating** total energy *conservation* law is self-**contradictory** and false.

As I said, for atomic energy to be determined as the definite value, at least **two** conditions governng electron's motion are necessary. = The first condition is total energy (= kinetic + Coulomb potential energies ) is **conserved**. The second condition is the orbital length is an interger times de Broglie wavelength (= which determines electron's kinetic energy ).

In multi-electron atoms, one more condition is necessary to determine energy values. This third condition is the "**distance** between repulsive electrons", which determines "effective central charge Z" (= the sum of positive charge of an nucleus and negative charges of other electorons. ).

This positive central effective charge Z increases ( or decreases ) when the distance between two repulsive electron is longer ( or shorter ).

In unrealistic quantum mechanical atoms or molecule, the distance between two electrons can take **random** and arbitrary values due to vaguely-spreading electron cloud, so this central effective positive charge Z cannot be determined as the definite value. → Total energy can**not** be conserved or determined as the definite value.

So the multi-electron atom's energy value can be determined by three conditions: the central positive charge Z + an electron moving around the central positive charge in the orbit whose orbital length is an interger times de Broglie wavelength + the total energy is always conserved wherever electrons are inside an atom as the definite value.

As I said, in the quantum mechanical cloud, each electron can always exist **every**where *limitlessly* inside an atom or a molecule. ← The distance between two electrons can be randomly changeable and **arbitrary** (= hence, Coulomb repulstive energy between two electrons is uncertain an arbitrary, too ). → No energy conservation, so false theory.

For two electrons to be avoiding each other, each electron must be "**particle**-like" moving localized in the definite position, which requires the spreading probability wavefunction to **shrink** and be sharper, *localized* only in one particular place, but its **sharper** wavefunction (= shorter de Broglie wavelength ) drastically **increases** electron's *kinetic* energy.

If an "electron cloud" tries to be localized in one particular place → quantum probability wavefunction becomes sharper and narrower only in the electron's place. → de Broglie wavelength gets unrealistically shorter. →Electron's kinetic energy becomes drastically **higher**. →Total *energy* becomes mugh **higher** than experimentally confirmed lowest (= ground-state ) energy value. ← This theory is wrong. → An electron cannot move or get localized in one particular place in quantum mechanical "probability" electron cloud.

So a quantum mechanical electron can **never** be *localized* only in one place, as long as the electron is expressed as nonphysical "probability" wavefunction **mixing up** a particle and wave picture.

In quantum mechanical wavefunction which can**not** separate an electron particle from de Broglie wave, each electron must always **spread** *all* over place as an unrealistic electron **cloud**, making it impossible to conserve total energy by allowing each electron to exist **every**where *simultaneously*.

This quantum mechanical electron cloud where a electron cannot move to one particular place (= cannot approach the other nucleus ) as a particle, cannot generate powerful Coulomb attraction enough to form molecular bond.

Therefore, quantum mechanics has to rely on "dirty **tricks**" of *lowering* **kinetic** energy illegitimately, even by deliberately violating total energy conservation law to generate **fake** molecular bond energy.

As a result, Einstein ad-hoc relativistic theory rejecting "real medium" 100 years ago and colluding with parallel-world quantum mechanics **spawned** many "*irreparable* self-**contradictions**", demonstrating all these so-called mainstream theories are physically **false**.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(M-1) ↓ Each electron exists in two atoms in * *?*

Coulomb electric force is the most important and influential force playing a **major** role in binding atoms and all biological **reactions**.

Coulomb electric force is the **only** source of "potential energy" or attraction between particles, which forms atomic or molecular bonds also in quantum mechanics.

But in fact, surprisingly, *unrealistic* quantum mechanics can **Not** use this *Coulomb* **force** (= the **only** contributor to attraction and potential energy ) in forming molecular bond joining two atoms together !

Strictly speaking, quantum mechanics can **Not** use any *real* "**forces**" inside atoms or molecules.

This means quantum mechanics is **wrong** and useless as atomic tool due to **lack** of concept of "force" between atoms.

This is why the current "scientists" are *obsessed* only with "literature" selling "sci-fi" books, changing their **pseudo**-science, education, universities into a mere "**political** tool" indoctrinating students with *illusion* irrelevant to actual science.

Is this **failed** quantum "science" related to dangerous academia pulling strings behind cracking down on social media using uncanny "extra-dimensional" power ?

Many experiments showed each electron is really a "negatively-charged particle" with definite mass **moved** by Coulomb electric **force**.

At the same time, many experiments showed each electron behaves like "de Broglie wave" causing interference like classical sound wave. The electron's wavelength proved to be inversely proportional to the electron's momentum or kinetic energy.

A "**particle**" and "*wave* are completely **different** things with different shapes and properties, which are *incompatible* with each other.

Quantum mechanics has endured this self-**contradiction** for a long time, claiming each electron or light can be a particle **and** wave at the same time, **without** showing concrete underlying mechanism, so it's a **dead** theory.

Quantum mechanics has been haunted by illusory idea that each electron or a particle can pass through two slits **at once** using *fantasy* parallel universes, causing interference.

The **only** realistic and **possible** intepretation of two slit experiment of a single electron is
that an electron is an "actually-moving **particle**" that can pass through only **one** slit at once, generating de Broglie *wave* around it, which pushes the electron, causing interference.

But this realistic atomic model based on a **real** *moving* electron (= particle ) and real de Broglie wave faced complicated three-body problem in **multi**-electron atoms where several electrons are moving, pushing each other real-time which calculation needed modern computers which did **Not** exist in 1920s when physicists had no choice but to accept unrealistic quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanics **abandoned** the notion that an electron is a real particle, instead, expresses each electron as vague electron cloud spreading all over space in the form of **unphysical** wavefuncton.

Each electron's **position** and velocity are completely **unknown** using notorious uncertainty principle as an excuse, meaning each electron can exist in *multiple* **different** places at once using quantum mechanical parallel worlds.

Strangely, still Nobody understands the deeper physical mechanism behind this uncanny quantum mechanical world, even after 100 years have passed since its foundation.

**Un**physical electron cloud model of quantum mechanics works only in the simplest **one**-electron hydrogen atom, because hydrogen's Schrödinger equation is the **only** atomic equation which is *solvable*, hence it has the exact solution.

Schrödinger equation = very old but the only calculation tool of the current quantum mechanics is **unsolvable** (= No exact solution ) in any multi-electron atoms or molecules.

Hence, quantum mechanics can just approximately choose "**fake** solution" called basis set or trial wavefunction, which ad-hoc method is just "art" rather than "science".

And its unphysical wavefunction came to be used as "probability density" of finding an electron in various places with **No** scientific basis.

This unphysical quantum mechanical wavefunction forcibly interpreted as "*probability* wavefunction" of an electron poses serious, irreparable **problems** especially in **molecular** bond energy.

When two atoms **approach** each other and form molecular bond between them, the only source of attractive force binding two atoms is Coulomb electric force between negatively-charged electrons and positively-charged nuclei.

So in a diatomic *molecule* consisting of two atoms *2*, the negatively charged electron-**1** of the atom-**1** is **attracted** to the positively-charged nucleus-*2* of the other atom-*2*, repelling other electrons-*2* of the atom-*2*, **lowering** total Coulomb potential energy, which lowered **Coulomb** potential *energy* is the **source** of this **molecular** bond energy.

But quantum mechanical "electron cloud" **spreading** thinly and *symmetrically* around the nucleus can **neither** approach the other nucleus nor avoid other electrons. ← cannot generate Coulomb attraction between atoms

Because this **whole** fuzzy "electron cloud" can**not** shrink into only one place or transform into a **point**-like charged particle that could easily approach or avoid other charged particles.

So quantum mechanical "electron cloud" can **Not** use *Coulomb* attractive **force** between electrons and nuclei (= "electron **cloud**" can**not** approach the other nucleus or avoid other electrons, like a point-like moving electron ) as the source of molecular binding energy !

This serious problem is due to spooky "wave-particle duality" where all quantum mechanics can do is express each electron **Not** as a moving point-like particle but as a "vaguely spreading *wave*function" = *probability* density of finding an electron **without** specifying the electron's exact position or localizing the electron in one place.

So when quantum mechanics tries to express an electron as a *point*-like "**particle**" moving to the left ( or right ) side of the nucleus (= localizing an electron only in **one** place around the nucleus in order to approach positive nuclei, avoiding other negative electrons ), the electron's probability wavefunction spreading all over space must **shrink** and become narrower, sharper and localized **only** in the place of the point-like electron.

Narrower and "**sharper** *probability* wavefunction" is equal to "**shorter** de Broglie wavelength ( which means **higher** kinetic energy )" in Schrödinger equation.

Hence, the localized electron → narrower probability wavefuncton → shorter de Broglie wavelength extremely **increases** electron's kinetic energy which **heightens** the total energy, **cancels** lowered Coulomb energy and makes it impossible to form molecular bond.

So if an electron (= spreading cloud or wavefunction in quantum mechanics ) tries to move and be localized to the **particular** *place* to approach the other nucleus, avoid other electrons and lower Coulomb potential energy,

→ **Probability** of finding an electron only in the "**particular** place" around the nucleus needs to be **higher**. → Probability **wavefunction** needs to be **sharper** and narrower **only** in that electron's place. → de Broglie *wavelength* becomes **shorter** → Electron's **kinetic** energy becomes extremely **higher**. → Total energy becomes higher → lowered Coulomb potential energy is **canceled**. →Molecular bond energy is **Not** formed in quantum mechanics.

On the other hand, in realistic atomic model separating an *electron* **particle** from *de Broglie* **wave** around it, the electron can easily move and be localized only in one place with **No** problem (= without increasing kinetic energy ).

Because "*real* de Broglie wave" **separated** from an "electron particle" has **nothing** to do with quantum mechanical **ad-hoc** interpretation of wavefunction as unphysical "**probability**" of finding an electron.

So the **real** electron (= **distinguished** from de Broglie wave ) can be easily localized only in the particular place **without** sharpening de Broglie wave or increasing its kinetic energy, different from quantum mechanics which needs **narrowing** "*probability* wavefunction (→ increase kinetic energy )" to **localize** an electron in the particular place.

So quantum mechanical electron cloud must always **spread** all over the place (= instead of being localized only in the particular place ) to prevent increasing the electron's kinetic energy, and be distributed symmetrically around the nucleus.

This quantum electron cloud cannot approach the other nucleus or avoid other electrons to generate Coulomb attractive force, hence, molecular bond energy caused by Coulomb force is **impossible** in quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanical electron cloud is similar to "*spherical* electron's charge" distributed evenly around the nucleus, which can be treated like a negative charge in exactly the **same** place as the central **nucleus** = the net charge of this electron **overlapping** with nucleus in the **same** place becomes almost zero, which cannot generate any Coulomb attraction to form molecular bond.

So quantum mechanics can**not** use **orthodox** idea that Coulomb attraction between electrons and nuclei of two atoms is the main source of molecular bond. Lowering Coulomb potential energy → loweres total energies → form molecular bond is **impossible** in quantum mechanics.

Instead, quantum mechanics has to use some "*dirty* **trick**" of lowering the electron's kinetic energy ( instead of lowering orthodox Coulomb potential energy ) **illegitimate**ly as the source of (fake) moelcular bond energy, which **violates** total energy conservation, so **false**.

For example, in hydrogen (= H2 ) molecule consisting of two hydrogen atoms ( = electron-**1** and nucleus-**1** in hydrogen atom-**1**, electron-*2* and nucleus-*2* in hydrogen atom-*2* ), quantum mechanics approximately **chooses** two hydrogen atomic wavefunctions as **fake** solution of H2 molecule.

The sum of an electron's **kinetic** energy and *Coulomb* potential energy between the electron and nucleus is the **total** energy, which must be **conserved** and constant wherever an electron is inside the atomic wavefunction, if this wavefunction is the true solvable solution (= which corresponds only to **one**-*electron* hydrogen atom ).

Quantum mechanics uses the combination of solvable hydrogen atomic wavefunctons as an approximate (= fake ) solution of larger molecule, so the total energy **only** *inside* each hydrogen **atomic** wavefunction is conserved (= the total energy between electron-**1** and nucleus-**1** inside the **same** hydrogen atom-**1** is **conserved**, but the energy between different atoms like electron-**1** of hydrogen atom-**1** and nucleus-*2* of hydrogen atom-*2* is **Not** conserved or constant ).

As the electron-**1** is moving farther away from the original nucleus-**1** inside hydrogen atom-**1** against Coulomb attraction (= Coulomb **potential** energy between electron-**1** and nucleus-**1** is **higher** ), the electron-1 **kinetic** energy becomes **lower** to conserve total energy.

As a result, the **total** energy (= only inside hydrogen atom-**1** ) remains conserved and constant = **higher** Coulomb potential energy between electron-**1** and nucleus-**1** + **lower** electron-1's kinetic energy, as the electron-**1** is farther away from the nucleus-**1**.

But when the electron-**1** moves farther **away** from nucleus-**1**, the electron-**1** approaches the *other* nucleus-*2*, hence it **lowers** the total Coulomb potential energy due to stronger Coulomb attraction between the electron-**1** and nucleus-*2*.

But in this fake H2 solution consisting of two hydrogen atomic wavefunctions, the electron-**1**'s kinetic energy (= given by hydrogen-**1** atomic wavefunction ) keeps **lower** even when the electron-**1** approaches nucleus-*2* (= electron-**1** is farther away from nucleus-**1** ), **lowering** total Coulomb potential energy.

So **lowered** Coulomb potential energy between electron-**1** and nucleus-*2* + **lowered** electron-**1**'s *kinetic* energy by moving farther away from nucleus-**1** = **lowered** total energy is No longer conserved or constant.

This illegitimately **lowered** *kinetic* energy of the electron-**1** ( or electron-2 ) near the other nucleus-*2* ( or nucleus-1 ) between two **different** atoms is the source of **fake** molecular bond energy of quantum mechanics. ← This sneaky trick intentionally exploits "**violation** of total energy conservation", so scientifically **invalid**.

There is still a **problem** in quantum mechanical electron's "probability cloud" model, which is **Not** enough to generate actual molecular bond energy just by **lowering** *kinetic* energy of the electron **near** the *other* nucleus of the other atom in an illegitimate way.

Think about when the electron-**1** approaches the other nucleus-*2* (= lowering both kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy of the electron-1 → lower total energy → slightly causes (fake) molecular bond energy ).

The electron-**1**'s probability *density* **near** the nucleus-*2* (= lower kinetic energy area ) is much *lower* than the electron-**1**'s probability density near the original nucleus-**1** (= higher kinetic energy area ).

So the **probability** of electron having **lower** *kinetic* energy is still **Not** high enough to cause molecular bond energy.

In order to **expand** the **probability** density area of the electron-**1** with **lowered** *kinetic* energy near the nucleus-*2* intentionally, quantum mechanics uses **non**physical trick called overlap ( or exchange ) integral.

To generate this quantum mechanical unphysical overlap (= exchange ) energy ( or integral ), each electron must unrealistically exist both in atom-1 and atom-2 at the **same** time using *fantasy* **parallel** worlds.

It means the electron-**1** of H2 molecule must have two **different** hydrogen atomic wavefunctions (= **φ _{a}** (

Quantum mechanics adopts strange, **un**physical **rule** that all electrons are "indistinguishable", so two electrons belonging to two different atoms ( or nuclei ) are indistinguishable, too.

This indistinguishable electrons even between different atoms pose serious problems which make it **impossible** for quantum mechanics to calculate (Coulomb) **forces** between two different atoms.

When we want to know the Coulomb force between an electron of Na atom and electrons of Cl atom, and compare it to other Coulomb force between the Na electron and other atomic electrons to predict in which direction this Na electron will be pulled by other charged particles, we have to **distinguish** Na atomic electrons from Cl or other atomic electrons in different places.

But according to unrealistic quantum mechanical rule, any electrons belonging to **different** *atoms* or places are **indistinguishable** (= hence, an electron specific to Na, Cl or other atoms does **Not** exist. Every electron must always exist in **all** different atoms or places such as Na, Cl and other atoms **simultaneously** ! )

So as long as we rely on quantum mechanical strange rule (= any two electrons are **indistinguishable** irrelevant to whether they belong to different atoms or not, and must exist in **multiple** different atoms **simultaneously** using parallel worlds ), we can **Not** calculate Coulomb forces of electrons ( or nuclei ) between different distinguishable atoms.

We can **Not** predict any chemical or biological reactions under this strange quantum mechanics, because we can**not** know in which **direction** each electron is pulled or pushed by other charged particles which are all **indistinguishable**, existing **everywhere** with No specific location (= Coulomb forces in different places and directions are all indistinguishable, so these "ghost-like" forces cannot be calculated ).

According to *artificial* Pauli exclusion principle **rule** of quantum mechanics, when the labels of any two electrons (= ex. electrons e1 and e2 ) are **exchanged** ( e1 ↔ e2 ), the total wavefunction must flip its sign ( ψ(e1, e2) = - ψ(e2, e1) ). ← This **ad-hoc** rule has **nothing** to do with reality, just unphysical, empty rule.

So if two wavefunctions of electrons 1 and 2 are the same ( φ_{a} = φ_{b} ), the total wavefunction becomes zero. ← Any two wavefunctions (= any two electrons' states ) must be **different**. ← **Pauli** principle = any two electrons cannot occupy the same state (= wavefunction, this p.6 ) ?

Under this **artificial** quantum mechanical Pauli principle rule, any two electrons are "indistinguishable", whether those two electrons belong to different atoms or not. Any total wavefunction must be "anti-symmetric" including unreal "spin" ( this p.4 ).

Therefore, the case where an electron-**1** exists only in atom-**1** and an electron-*2* exists only in atom-*2* is **impossible** in a quantum mechanical molecule.

An electron-**1** ( or electron-2 ) must always exist in **two** different atoms-**1** and atom-*2* **simultaneously** with the **same** probability using fictional *parallel* worlds.

H2 molecule wavefunction must always include H atom-**1** wavefunction possessing electron-**1** (= **φ _{a}**(

In the same way, the H2 molecule wavefunction must include H atom-**1** wavefunction with electron-*2* (= **φ _{a}**(

When we choose this artificial wavefunction where two electrons are indistinguishable as a molecule's **fake** solution and integrate it, we can obtain (fake) molecular total energy including *Coulomb* energy (= integral ) and **unphysical** "overlap exchange energy (= integral )".

This *unphysical* "**exchange** integral" is exploited to obtain **fake** molecular bond energy by artificially expand the electron's probability area with illegitimately lowered kinetic energy near the other nucleus.

Coulomb energy term (= integral ) includes the ordinary electron's probability (= the product of two **same** wavefunctions such as **φ _{a}**(

Exchange energy term (= integral ) is **unrealistic**, cannot be described by any real physical objects (= the product of the **different** wavefunctions like *φ _{b}*(

This **un**physical "**exchange** energy" (= **Not** Coulomb energy ) which lowers electron's kinetic energy illegitimately by violating total energy conservation law is the main source of **fake** molecular bond energy in quantum mechanics ( this p.3, this p.15-16, this p.4 figure.1 ).

Hence, quantum mechanics can **neither** express real Coulomb force (= which is too **weak** to form molecular bond between electron's spreading **clouds** which have to rely on **un**physical "*exchange* energy" ) nor distinguish two different electrons of two different atoms.

These "**ghost**-like" indistinguishable electrons designated by strange quantum mechanical rule which can**not** generate even real Coulomb force are completely **useless** as basic physical tool for using atomic or electronic bahavior in applied science such as biology and medicine.

By flipping the sign and changing this "exchange attractive energy causing fake molecular bond" into "exchange repulsion", it becomes Pauli exclusion repulsion, which is strangely Not admitted to be a true force, lacking force carrier. **No** physical interpretation is given to this **un**physical, *uncanny* exchange energy ( this p.6 ), which disagrees with experimental facts, hence, **useless** in practical science.

Due to these unrealistically **indistinguishable** electrons of quantum mechanics, all the current condensed matter physics has to rely on bogus one-electron (= indistinguishable ) approximation = density functional theory (= DFT ) where the whole many-electron material is treated like one big fictitious, *indistinguishable* **pseudo**-electron ( this p.3 ).

Humans already have useful technology of **distinguishing** and manipulating each different atoms one by one using atomic force microscope.

But unphysical quantum mechanical rule where any atoms or electrons are **indistinguishable** forbids physicists from distinguishing individual different atoms for applying atomic interaction in sophisticated nano-technology.

Hence, concept of "real" Coulomb **force** or Pauli exclusion **force** between different atoms or electrons is **Not** allowed in quantum mechanics, even after we can actually measure thoses forces precisely by atomic force microspoce. ← self-**contradiction**. Science stops progressing.

So even when physicists want to move an electron from atom-1 to atom-2 using some nano-device, strangely, they are **Not** allowed to **distinguish** those clearly different electrons belonging to three different atoms (= atom-1, atom-2 and nano-device ). ← **No** reality in atomic world.

Therefore, any different electrons belonging to atom-1, atom-2 and nano-device must always be **mixed** as "*one* **indistinguishable** *pseudo*-electron", using one-pseudo-electron approximation = DFT ( this p.2, this p.6 ) in quantum mechanics.

We have to **give up** calculating **forces** between those indistinguishable "**ghost**-like" atoms mixed up as **one** *pseudo*-electron, even when we can detect different individual atoms or electrons as actually-dinstinguishable (= differently movable in different directions ) objects, and measure "forces" such as Coulomb, Pauli and van der Waarls forces.

As long as we rely on quantum mechanics, we can neither distinguish each electron belonging to different atoms nor use real forces. ← One pseudo-electron and unreal quasiparticle appoximation always have to be used to interpret the measured atomic forces or energy.

Applying these quantum mechanical ghost-like electrons and atoms which can exist in different places at once using parallel worlds to actual nano-technology or medicine is impossible forever.

So the first thing for us to do is **replace** unrealistic quantum mechanics by some real atomic model where electrons are actually "*moving* **particles**" avoiding each other, and its de Broglie **wave** caused around the electron is distinguishable from an electron particle.

In this realistic atomic model, electrons can easily approach other nuclei, avoiding other electrons with No troubles, causing real powerful Coulomb **force** enough to generate real molecular bond. = This real atomic model does **Not** need to use unphysical "exchange energy" between uncanny "indistinguishable electrons or parallel worlds.

Destructive interference of electron's de Broglie wave allows us to estimate each electron's orbital radius (= which information is necessary to calculate actual forces between atoms, electrons ), and admit Pauli exclusion repulsion as "**real** physical force" with force carrier.

And this real atomic model will surely **free** us from the current quantum mechanical annoying, **unreal** concepts such as virtual particles, parallel worlds and fantasy cosmology.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ Dirty trick used in H2 molecule of *

Quantum mechanics is mind-bogglingly **weird** and unrealistic.

Quantum mechanics says an electron can exist in *multiple* different places simultaneously, using the mythcal "power" of **parallel** universes like a **ghost**.

Uncanny quantum mechanics **stops** treating molecules, solids and proteins as real physical objects, instead, it made up **fictitious** model based on unreal quasi-particles with fake mass to explain various physical phenomena involving many-body effects.

There is **No** point in *distinguishing* individual particles existing in **different** places according to weird quantum mechanics which claims each particle can pass through two slits at once using parallel worlds.

So physicists started to treat the whole many-electron material consisting of many different atoms as "one big **fictitious** pseudo-electron with fake (= effective ) mass" using bogus one-electron approximation called density functional theory (= DFT this p.3 ).

This unjustifiable quantum mechanical method **giving up** *distinguishing* different electrons as if the entire material with many electrons were "one indistinguishable **pseudo**-electron" poses serious **problems** especially in applied science manipulating many differently-moving electrons.

The current medicine still pins its hope on very **old** technique "vaccine" as the only way left for us to contain viruses. But recent studies showing "rapidly-vanishing immunity after coronavirus infection seem to **doom** our last hope = vaccine.

We have to find effective drugs for deadly viruses by precisely understanding **molecular** interactions of viral infection in order to block their invasion at the "**atomic** level".

But the current only atomic theory = unrealistic quantum mechanics **forbids** us from *distinguishing* electrons in different places such as a virus, a human cell and a drug molecular atoms, all of which are said to be like a ghost existing in **every** place at once using quantum **parallel** worlds.

Hence, the entire many-electron material must be treated like one big fictitious pseudo-electron or quasiparticle under the current only atomic theory = quantum mechanics.

So as long as we use this **fictional** quantum mechanical world as a basic tool to understand underlying complicated atomic mechanism, curing deadly diseases and developing useful nano-technology utilizing atomic interaction are **impossible** forever.

Physicists **gave up** practical use of their pseudo-science, instead, they focus only on selling "sci-fi" books or politics where arrogant academia judges "democracy" depending on whether politicians can give taxpayers' money to their fake science = extradimensions.

In coronavirus pandemic, finding new futuristic jobs and developing "dreamlike" technology will be extremely **difficult**, as long as our basic physics makes No progress stuck in fictional science.

Unfortunately, the current **old**-fashioned, obsolete school system (= spreader of viruses ) **indoctrinating** students with fake science seems to
be the first thing that should be replaced by other new jobs.

In fact, quantum mechanics is doomed to **fail** in all applied science, whatever it tries in **vain**, as long as its basic unrealistic principle is unchanged.

Quantum mechanics can**not** show the concrete shape or position of each electron, instead, it just shows unphysical wavefunction where each electron is supposed to spread as vague "probability" electron cloud **obscuring** its location.

This unrealistic electron cloud thinly spreading "symmetrically" around a nucleus has No problem only in **one**-electron hydrogen atom.

In a hydrogen (= H2 ) **molecule** consisting of two hydrogen atoms with two electrons, each electron needs to be distributed around each nucleus "**un**symmetrically" (= contrary to quantum mechanical wavefunction ) to **join** two hydrogen atoms together by Coulomb attraction between electrons and nuclei.

For the H2 molecular bond to be formed, a negatively charged electron must move to "**one** side" of the original nucleus (= unsymmetrically ), **approach** the other positively-charged nucleus, **avoiding** the other electron which must step aside to the opposite side of the nucleus, obeying Coulomb electric force.

The Coulomb **attraction** between a negative electron and a positive nucleus **lowers** *potential energy*, and this "**lower** Coulomb *potential* **energy**" is the generator of stable molecular bond energy **binding** two atoms tightly in normal molecules.

But an electron cloud which always **spreads** all over space can **neither** avoid the other electron cloud nor approach the other nucleus, because the electron cloud can**not** *move* to one side of a nucleus, hence 'real' molecular bond based on Coulomb attraction is **impossible** in quantum mechancs.

But to generate "molecular *bond* energy", "**lowering** total energy" somehow is indispensable, whether Coulomb attraction is mainly involved in molecular bond or not. Quantum mechanics which can**not** use Coulomb *attraction* as a binding energy source has to rely on other **un**scientific dirty **tricks**.

First of all, why can**not** quantum mechanical electron cloud move to the left or right side of an nucleus ? = Why can**not** quantum electron cloud be localized unsymmetrically to either side of a nucleus (= an electron cloud can**not** approach the other nucleus or avoid the other electron cloud, different from a point-like electron ) to lower Coulomb potential energy ?

Quantum mechanical cloud (= wavefunction ) cannot distinguish between a particle and wave, so an electron must be treated as a mere vague "wavefunction" which always **spread**s **all** over the place.

In order to **confine** and localize an electron to one place (= left or right side of a nucleus ), the **probablity** of finding an electron in that place must be extremely **higher** than any other places

The **higher** electron's probability wavefunction only in **one** side or one place means the probability wavefunction must be narrower and sharper, the electron's de Broglie wavelength (= the same thing as probability wavefunction ) must be much **shorter** (= electron momentum and kinetic energy become **higher** ) only in that place.

"Extremely **short** de Broglie wavelength" due to narrower probability wavefunction in order to confine an electron only to one specific location drastically **increases** the electron's momentum or kinetic energy.

"Extremely **higher** *kinetic energy*" caused by **sharper** electron's wavefunction (= shorter de Broglie wavelength ) localizing an electron cloud in one place leads to extremely **higher** total energy which **nullifies** lowered Coulomb potential energy between localized electron cloud and nuclei.

Therefore, real molecular bond caused by Coulomb attractive energy between a negative localized electron and positive nucleus is **impossible** in quantum mechanical electron cloud model which can**not** move or be localized to one side of a nucleus ( which needs "sharper" probability wavefunction in one side of a nucleus, hence, it drastically **heighten** electron's kinetic energy ) to approach the other nucleus, avoiding the other electron.

But in order to form stable molecular bond, they have to **lower** the molecular *total* **energy** somehow. If Coulomb attraction (= lowering Coulomb potential energy → lower total energy ) is **impossible** in quantum mechanics, the only way left is to "**lower** electron's **kinetic** energy" using some "*cheating*" **tricks**.

In this **dirty** tricks, quantum mechanics tries to lower **only** "electron's kinetic energy", keeping Coulomb potential energy unchanged (= Coulomb attraction between two atoms remains too weak to cause actual molecular bond in quantum mechanical cloud model ), which "illegitimately lowered kinetic energy" **violates** total energy **conservation** law, hence scientifically **invalid**, as I explain here.

How is such a **un**scientific trick possible ?

Schrödinger equation = the current only method of explaining atomic electron's behavior by quantum mechanics cannot be solved except for the simplest one-electron hydrogen atom.

So quantum mechanics has **No** method of describing any multi-electron atoms or molecules in an exact, righteous way.

Quantum mechanics just artificially chooses "fake solution" called basis set, which method of choosing arbitrary fake solution is "art" rather than science, which is **useless**.

The sum of Coulomb potential energy and electron's kinetic energy is the **total** energy which value must be **conserved** and constant wherever an electron moves inside the wavefunction which is the exact solution of Schrödinger equation giving constant total energy value.

Only solvable one-electron hydrogen atom can find exact solution and **constant** total (= ground-state ) energy E in Schrödinger equation, it means **only** one-electron hydrogen atom can rigorously obey total energy **conservation** law.

Quantum mechanics approximately treats hydrogen molecule (= H2 ) as "two overlapped hydrogen atomic wavefuncton", which is **Not** a true solution, so the total energy is **Not** conserved inside this fake H2 molecule solution.

In the hydrogen (= H ) atom-1's wavefunction inside H2 molecule, as the electron-1 moves farther **away** from the nucleus-1, Coulomb attraction between the electron-1 and nucleus-1 decreases, hence, Coulomb potential energy between the electron-1 and nucleus-1 becomes **higher**.

To conserve the total energy, the electron-1's kinetic energy must get **lower** to *cancel* **higher** Coulomb potential energy, as the electron-1 gets farther away from the nucleus-1 (= potential energy is **higher** ).

The total energy = **lower** kinetic energy + **higher** potential energy remains **constant** and conserved between the electron-**1** and the nucleus-**1** (= the total energy is conserved also between the electron-*2* and nucleus-*2* ).

Because in quantum mechanics which approximately treats H2 molecule as two hydrogen atoms, total energy between an electron and a nucleus is conserved **only** in each hydrogen **atom**. ← They don't think about energy conservation between different hydrogen atoms (= total energy between electron-**1** and nucleus-*2* is Not conserved ).

The problem is this total energy is **Not** conserved (= hence, **wrong** ! ) between the electron-**1** and nucleus-*2* ( or between the electron-*2* and nucleus-**1** ), because the electron-**1** belongs to hydrogen atom-**1**, and nucleus-*2* belongs to hydrogen atom-*2*.

In H2 molecule, even when the electron-**1** approaches the other nucleus-*2* and **lowers** Coulomb potential energy between the electron-**1** and nucleus-*2*, the electron-**1**'s **kinetic** energy expressed by "hydrogen atom-**1** wavefuncton" remains **lower**.

The **lower** kinetic energy + **lower** potential energy → much **lower** total energy, which is **No** longer constant or conserved in the electron-**1** approaching around the nucleus-*2*. ← **violating** total energy conservation law.

This "*illegitimately* **lowered** *kinetic* energy" of the electron-**1** ( or 2 ) **near** the **other** nucleus-*2* ( or 1 ) is the origin of **fake** molecular bond energy in quantum mechanics.

Because electron cloud which **spreads** all over the place, being distributed symmetrically around each nucleus can**not** generate Coulomb attraction caused by **localizing** an electron only to **one** *side* of a nucleus (= lowering Coulomb potential energy → lowering total energy is impossible ) in quantum mechanical H2 molecule.

This cheap *trick* of quantum mechanics **lowering** only the electron's **kinetic** energy ( even in the area of lower Coulomb potential energy, → total energy conservation is violated ) is still **Not** enough to generate actual molecular bond energy.

Hence, **another** dirty **trick** or sneaky technique to seemingly lower total energy in an illegitimate way is necessary in quantum mechanics.

The electron-**1**'s probability density decreases in the area farther away from the nucleus-1, so the electron-1 **probability** is much **lower** around the distant nucleus-*2* (= where the electron-1's *kinetic* energy is **lower** ) than the electron-1 probability near the nucleus-**1** (= where the electron-1's kinetic energy is higher ).

So the **probability** density of the electron with **lower** *kinetic energy* (= the electron-**1**'s probability around nucleus-*2* )
is too **small** to cause actual molecular bond by lowering total energy ( this p.3 ).

They need to **expand** the small probability density area (= around nucleus-*2* ) of the electron-1 with **lower** kinetic energy using other illegitimate **tricks** called "overlap (= **exchange** ) integral".

To do so, quantum mechanics claims the electron-1 ( or 2 ) exists in **both** hydrogen atomic wavefunctions 1 **and** 2 **simultaneously** using parallel worlds.

In **real** hydrogen atoms of a hydrogen molecule,

The electron-1 mainly belongs to the nucleus-1 in hydrogen atom-1.

The electron-2 mainly belongs to the nucleus-2 in hydrogen atom-2.

In **unreal** hydrogen molecule in quantum mechanics,

The electron-1 belongs **both** to the nucleus-1 and nucleus-2 at the **same** time with the **same** probability.

The electron-2 belongs both to the nucleus-1 and nucleus-2 at the same time with the same probability.

Quantum mechanics claims the electron-1 can belong to **both** nucleus-1 and nucleus-2 at once like a *ghost* (= a particle can exist in different places at once in quantum parallel worlds ).

Hence, the electron-1 and electron-2 are **indistinguishable** and inseparable as "**one** *fictitious* pseudo-electron" inside a quantum H2 molecule.

The electron-1 existing in two different places simultaneously is supposed to have two different hydrogen atomic wavefunctions aroud nucleus-1 (= **φ _{1}** or φ

When we **choose** this "symmetric wavefunction" as a **fake** solution and integrate it, we obtain fake energy containing unphysical overlap (= exchange ) integral ( this p.14 ).

With the help of this strange "**exchange** integral", the illegitimately lowered kinetic energy's area of electron-1 (= **probability** **φ _{1}** (

So in quantum mechanical molecule, just ordinary Coulomb energy (= integral ) is **Not** enough to cause actual molecular bond energy, it needs **unrealistic** "exchange integral" ( this p.15-16, this p.4, figure-1 ).

By flipping the sign and changing this "exchange attractive energy causing fake molecular bond" into "exchange repulsion", it becomes Pauli exclusion repulsion, which is strangely Not admitted to be a true force, lacking force carrier. **No** physical interpretation is given to this **un**physical, uncanny exchange energy ( this p.6 ), which disagrees with experimental facts, hence, **useless** in practical science.

Quantum mechanical wavefunction cannot distinguish between a particle and wave. ( while realistic atomic model can distinguish an electron particle from its de Broglie wave produced around the electron particle ).

↓

Quantum mechanical electron cloud spreading everywhere cannot approach the other nucleus or avoid the other electron, hence, molecular bond by Coulomb attractive energy is impossible in quantum mechanics.

↑ The most important "Coulomb force" can**not** be used in quantum mechanical chemical reaction ! ← Quantum mechanical atomic model is unreal and **useless** as a physical tool, forever.

↓

Two hydrogen atoms (= spreading as electron clouds ) cannot generate enough Coulomb attractive force or energy to cause molecular bond in quantum mechanics.

↓

Quantum mechanics artificially **chooses** "unphysical symmetric wavefunction" consisting of two indistinguishable hydrogen atoms as a **fake** solution of unsolvable Schrödinger equation of H2 molecule. ←Its integral causes "unphysical exchange (= overlap ) integral".

↓

Quantum mechanics tries to **lower** electron's *kinetic energy* using **illegitimate** dirty tricks to generate **fake** molecular bond energy even by **violating** energy conservation law.

↓

No realistic physical interpretation is given to this strange "exchange energy ( this p.3 )" where an electron can exist in **different** places or **all** different atoms simultaneously using quantum *parallel* worlds.

↓

This unrealistically **in**distinguishable electron cloud model spreading the whole molecule **prevents** physicists from using quantum mechanics as a reliable, realistic tool, and they came to treat the whole many-electron molecule or solid as one pseudo-electron band or unreal quasiparticle model.

The fact that quantum mechanics cannot be used as a realistic atomic tool makes it **impossible** for us to utilize atomic behavior in applied science such as medicine and drug discovery due to **useless** quantum physics.

Humans already have excellent technology of observing and manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope.

In order to use each single atom and electron as realistic basic physical tools, we have to **distinguish** between a particle and wave, and of course, we have to treat different individual *electrons* belonging to **different** atoms as "distinguishable different objects", **without** relying on fictitious quasiparticle model or one-electron approximatnion = DFT.

For example, when we try to move an electron-1 from an atom-1 to another atom-2 using some nano-device, we have to treat electrons belonging to **different** places (= atom-1, atom-2, nano-device ) as **distinguishable** (= differently-movable ) electrons.

Unrealistic quantum mechanical world where each electron can exist in **multiple** different places **at once** like a *ghost* tries to treat electrons belonging to different atoms as an "indistinguishable **un**physical entity" as seen in nonphysical "exchange energy" which is completely **useless** in actual nano-technology.

But when interpreting the observed data or images of atomic force microscope, all the current physicists **blindly** try to rely on unscientific DFT method ( this p.3 ), which treats all electrons belonging to different atoms as one big indistinguishable **fictitious** electron or quasiparticle.

And even when physicists measure Pauli exclusion repulstion, they can **Not** treat the Pauli repulsive force as a real force, as long as unreasonable quantum mechanical model is used to interpret the actually-measured force ( this p.10 ). ← this is ridiculous.

So quantum mechanics **forbids** physicists to treat different electrons belonging to different atoms as different individual real objects. Neither realistic physical interpretation nor treating Pauli repulsion as a real force is allowed in the current "mainstream" science.

This ambiguous and eerie quantum mechanical atomic world **avoiding** realistic interpretation stubbornly, shutting their eyes to underlying reality can **never** be put to practical use in actual science such as medicine and drug development.

Therefore, the first thing to do for utilizing atomic behavior in actual applied science or innovation is to **discard** useless, obsolete quantum mechanical model, and replace it by other realistic atomic models.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(S-1) ↓ Useless physics created unreal concepts = *

The current "science" pursues only **illusion** such as quantum mechanics, extra-dimensions, God particle, time travel, multiverse, mirror universe..

Physics professors became "pseudo-political analysts". Universities tied with criminal suspects make money by teaching pseudo-science = extra-dimensions.

You may often see incomprehensible word, "symmetry" in various scientific fields from particle to solid physics.

What the heck is this "symmetry" ?

Does this "symmetry" have anything to do with our physical world ?

In fact, this symmetry has **nothing** to do with real physical phenomena around us, hence, physically meaningless concept.

The present useless physics forced physicists to make up "**unreal** concepts" called "symmetry" as **fictitious** scientific *goals* like fantasy parallel worlds and Big Bang.

Quantum mechanics says each electron can become two conflicting things = a particle and wave, and exist in different places at once like a ghost.

So quantum mechanics can determine **nothing** about each particle's property (= a particle or wave ) or position. ← Completely **useless** atomic theory.

In 1920s, quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity were united into one *pseudo*-theory called "quantum field theory", which is just **non**physical abstract math with **No** relation to any real objects around us.

Quantum field theory impractically tries to apply only one abstract Einstein mass mc^{2} equation to every physical phenomenon in the universe
in the form of Dirac equation. ← **Impossible** !

Quantum field theory can only express each electron and photon (= a particle of light ? ) as **non**physical math symbols (= a particle is expressed as a^{†}, b^{†}, c^{†} .. ) **without** showing any more detailed physical figure of each particle than abstract math symbols.

This mathematical quantum field theory has **No** ability to explain actual complicated physical phenomena, because it uses only its unrealistic abstract math symbols as fictitious particles.

So physicists had to create other *artificial* **fictitious** concepts in order just to develop their pseudo-theory and explain various physical phenomena (= most of which are irrelevant to our daily life ), **without** showing detailed physical mechanism or delving into underlying reality.

One of these fictitious concepts is an unreal virtual particle as imaginary force carrier with unphysical mass ( this p.3 ).

Other unreal artificial concepts are electron's "spin" which is Not a real "spinning", and "exchange energy" which tries to describe Pauli exclusion principle just by artificial unphysical rule of "particle exchange", which is strangely Not a real force, and No physical interpretation can be given to it ( this p.6 ).

The only way for unrealistic quantum mechanics to explain physical phenomena and develop their *pseudo*-theory is to increase **fictitious** particles and concepts meaninglessly, **without** showing underlying concrete physical reality.

But just increasing unreal concepts or pseudo-particles in a random and disorderly way is **purposeless** and scientifically valueless, so physicists needed to create some new "*artificial* rule" seemingly connecting all **fictitious** particles and concepts to make their *pseudo*-science **look** scientifically "meaningful".

This "artificial rule" is so-called symmetry, which was introduced only to develop their **un**physical quantum field theory, though "symmetry" has **nothing** to do with our real world or actual physical phenomena.

"Symmetry" is nothing but an unrealistic, unphysical, abstract math concept or rule fabricated by unreal quantum theory.

Dirac equation invented as the only equation describing quantum field theory is too simple and too abstract to explain various complicated physical phenomena.

Its **non**physical wavefunction (= ψ ) is supposed to represent all fermions such as electrons and quarks. Math symbol "A" represents a "photon". ← No more detailed description of each particle's shape ( this p.20 ), completely **useless** equation.

Physicists suddenly made up artificial rules = when this nonphysical wavefunction is changed by artificially-introduced "phase transformation" and the whole Dirac equation is **invariant**, it is called "symmetry" ( this p.11 ).

This "phase transformation" + "invariant equation" = "symmetry" is just an artificial rule which has **nothing** to do with real physical objects.

By increasing the number of types of these artificial "symmetry transformations", physicists came to increase **fictitious** particles such as quarks using this ad-hoc rule (= symmetry ) as an excuse to rely on fictitious particles.

When this artificial symmetry is broken by additional mass (= m ) term, this is called "Higgs mechanism", all of these particles are just nonphysical math symbols ( this p.7 ) without physical figure, hence they have **nothing** to do with our real world.

When this artificial "symmetry transformation" exchanges a particle for its imaginary "shadow particle", it is called "supersymmetry" which unphysical math concept also has **nothing** to do with our real world ( this p.11 ).

This unphysical concept called supersymmetry is necessary to reduce 26-dimensional string to 10-dimensional superstring theory ( this p.15 ).

Anyway, this string theory a.k.a "theory of everything" is untestable, hence, **meaningless** theory, because its extradimension can never been seen, and string theory including as many as 10^{500} freely adjustable parameters cannot predict any physical values.

This is why the leading string theorist, Witten **gave up** practical use of his *pseudo*-science (= extra-dimensions ) and is obsessed only with "politics" irrelevant to science now.

Supersymmetry also includes more than 100 freely-adjustable parameters which is completely **useless**, cannot predict any physical values.

The "*reality*" of a theory depends on whether the theory actually "**influences**" and contributes to actual technology **improving** our daily life.

Just because the theory got prestigious Nobel prize does **Not** mean the theory is real, as long as it is **useless** except as "political tool" to waste taxpayers' money in the name of "science".

Actually **Nobody** uses unseen extra-dimensions, supersymmetric particles, quarks, God particle Higgs, black hole or quantum computer in our daily life. It means all these particles are just *worthless* **fiction**, so is the "symmetry".

Physicists think only about wasting taxpayers' money in meaningless gigantic collider or fabricating imaginary particles in order just to develop their *pseudo*-theory and sell "sci-fi" books, **forgetting** practical use of real "science".

**Nobody** around you uses unreal "virtual particles of QED which is **useless**", because it lacks physical reality from the beginning, and its calculation results always diverge to infinity.

Physicists invented artificial trick called renormalization which cannot predict any physical values like freely-adjustable parameters by **artificially** subtracting arbitrary infinity from infinity to get finite values, which meaningless dirty trick was harshly criticized even by founders.

Unless we replace the current pseudo-physics by other real practical atomic theories, applying basic physics (← this must be a real theory, first ! ) to curing deadly diseases is impossible forever.

Sadly, also in the current outdated educational system, "going to schools perfunctorily or subsidizing old-fashioned academia" sacrificing students' future by forcing their fake science is its only (fictitious) goal like this unphysical "symmetry", **forgetting** teaching "real science".

See this week physics is still useless.

*(S-1) ↓ Unreal artificial 'exchange energy' created by *

The current mainstream 'science' pursues only **fantasy** things such as parallel worlds, extra-dimensions, "two places at once", and Big Bang.

Still No physicists understand what they are doing or where they are going in 'science'.

Physics turned into a mere 'political tool' or 'literature' to sell 'sci-fi' books, **giving up** practical use of science. ← Finding an effective cure for deadly viruses is impossible in this 'miserable' science forever.

If globalists, academia try to 'defund the police' and divert the money to their fake science under the name of "education", it will just **postpone** our chance to escape from fake science. ← vicious cycle.

If people want real 'freedom' from inconvenient 'social distancing' life under pandemic, the only way is to **free** us from 'old obsolete science' which academia has forced on us, stifling us, preventing developing an effective cure for diseases forever.

All these disaster, fake science and inconvenient life originated from **un**physical quantum mechanics invented as a mere 'stopgap' atomic theory 100 years ago.

After realistic atomic model successfully explained one-electron hydrogen atom's quantized energies, it struggled to explain multi-electron atoms such as helium.

Helium atom has **two** moving electrons, so it is a complicated 'three-body problem' which required the help of modern computers to calculate its complicated atomic electrons' motions precisely.

Of course, there was **No** such thing as a convenient computer or PC in 1920s when physicists struggled to formulate the unseen atomic behavior and design the new model.

Unrealistic quantum mechanics was made up as a "**stopgap** theory" to fill the **blank** period of science until modern calculation tool = computer was invented, though we are still stuck in this old **useless** atomic model, wasting our useful computing resources even now.

Quantum mechanics fabricated unphysical 'spin' to seemingly tackle many-electron atoms which intrinsically can**not** be dealt with by quantum mechanics.

Electron 'spin' is an unrealistic and contradictory concept which was artificially introduced to **fit** complicated atomic behavior caused by many electrons into **old**-fashioned quantum mechanical model, in an illegitimate way.

A hydrogen atom was known to generate magnetic field called Bohr magneton which observed magnetic field just agreed with the one explained by Bohr's classical orbit.

Quantum mechanical hydrogen must always include **unrealistic** zero angular momentum of an electron's orbit which means the electron always crashes into a nucleus. ← Unreasonable !

**Zero** orbital angular momentum generates **No** magnetic field.

So quantum mechanics **artificially** introduced **un**physical 'spin' which coincidentally generates the same magnetic field as Bohr's classical orbit. ← Too good to be true.

The problem is an electron is very tiny, so each electron must be 'spinning' at far faster-than-light speed to generate the observed magnetic field. Therefore, quantum mechanics started to say electron 'spin' is Not a real 'spinning' ! ← self-**contradiction** ( this p.2 ).

Quantum mechanics also artificially and unjustifiably **adjusted** its ad-hoc spin model to fit the existing Bohr's model which had already succeeded in explaining finely split atomic spectrum without spin.

Quantum mechanics **with** 'spin' just exactly *agreed* with classical Bohr's orbit **without** spin in all atomic energy levels.
← What a **coincidence** !

The problem is the magnetic energy caused by electron spin is too **weak** to explain actual atomic behavior or energy levels. ← Electron spin is **useless** if it remains in its original definition of 'spin *magnet*'.

Coulomb electric force between electrons, which is a main contributor to various atomic phenomena, is much stronger than magnetic energy between electron spins, which **spin** *magnetic* force is *negligibly* **small**, too weak to apply in actual chemical reactions.

It is known that the third electron of lithium cannot enter innermost orbit, **excluded** by mysterious very powerful **repulsion** called Pauli exclusion principle which energy is as strong as Coulomb electric force ( > 30 eV, this p.8 ).

We can estimate the strength of **magnetic** energy between electrons by considering each electron spin as a "magnet (= magnetic dipole moment )".

This electron spin-spin magnetic dipole energy is far smaller ( < 0.0001 eV ) than actual Pauli repulsive energy.

So the influence of "electron spin" treated as "*magnet* (= original definition of spin )" is too **small** and *disagrees* with experimental facts, hence, 'spin' itself intrinsically can**not** explain various actual physical phenomena or magnetic materials such as ferromagnet ( this p.6, this p.20 ).

But physicists had to **continue** their research, developing new **stopgap** theory (= even if it **lacked** reality, and faced opposition from founders ) to get research fund and good academic positions.

Physicists always **craved** some 'immediate *answer*', reason and mathematical formulation of underlying unseen atomic mechanism, even if its formulation resorted to unphysical objects.

This dire situation forced them to artificially make up new **un**physical concept called "exchange energy ( this p.9 )" to explain the origin of powerful and mysterious Pauli exclusion repulsion and magnetic materials "quantum-mechanically" using unreal "spin".

This spin "exchange energy" is unrealistic and **illogical** with **No** physical interpretation ( this p.6, this p.3 ), it allegedly generates strong Pauli repulsive force, but cannot be treated as real "force", lacking a force carrier. ← self-**contradiction**, and it's like a **ghost** !

Of course, this strange spin 'exchange energy' is **neither** magnetic nor electric energies ( due to 'Not forces' ), so it cannot be explained by any real things existing in this world, though exchange energy is supposed to be as strong as electric energy.

It's impossible to express this **uncanny** Pauli spin 'exchange energy' by any imaginable real physical objects. Then, how does quantum mechanics describe the ghost-like concept in "mathematical (= **non**physical ) language ?

Quantum mechanics says Pauli exclusion principle is expressed as "nonphysical antisymmetric wavefunction" where exchanging labels of two electrons flips the sign of the whole wavefunction. ← That's all. **No** more detailed physical reason behind Pauli principle is given !

Quantum mechanics cannot express each particle or electron's spin as real physical objects, it only expresses each electron as **non**physical math symbol (= an electron = a^{†}, b^{†}, c^{†} = math symbol ), and each spin as two kinds of unphysical arrows ( spin = ↓ or ↑ ). No concrete physical shape or size was given to each electron and spin ( this p.2 right ).

Using this **un**physical electron symbol, Pauli principle is expressed as abstract "anticommutation" where exchanging two electrons flips the sign. ← No more detailed physical interpretation of Pauli exclusion energy is given, except unphysical math.

Of course, it's impossible to describe actual complicated Pauli exclusion energies using only strange rule = "flipped sign" by exchanging nonphysical "spins" represented as two types of abstract arrows with No physical figure.

So quantum mechanics just explains each material using artificial **rough** approximation = "exchange parameter (= J )" which value can be freely changed and adjusted in different materials **without** detailed underlying physical mechanism. ← **Cut** too many corners, hence scientifically valueless method.

Just artificially changing free parameter J as the *fictitious* quantitative origin of strange Pauli exchange energy
in various magnetic materials **without** giving any concrete physical interpretation ( this p.8 ) is meaningless and **useless** when we try to predict new physical phenomena using basic common realistic physical tools without relying on freely-adjustble parameters.

It's impossible for quantum mechanics which stubbornly **rejects** realistic interpretation of basic physical mechanism to explain and predict actual complicated phenomena precisely.

So quantum mechanics can describe complicated many-electron material or solid only as very *rough* **un**physical approximation using one **fictitious** quasi-electron ( or band ) with fake (= effective ) mass, which can even be unreal negative mass, or fake charge ( this p.10 ).

When quantum mechanics talks about condensed matter physics and spintronics, its "spin" does Not belong to real electron. The spin is related to **fictitious** electrons ( this p.2, 4 ) or unreal quasiparticle with fake (= effective ) mass ( this p.3 ) which can freely **deviate** from real electron's mass, **losing** tough with reality.

So when physicists mention the spin-orbit interaction of material, its spin often means "**fake** spin" related to fake electron (= effective ) mass ( this p.5 ) with **No** more real physical interpretation, and those artificial values (= fake effective mass or spin-orbit ) are freely adjustable parameters ( this p.3, this p.9 ), and completely different from free real electrons in the vacuum ( this p.2 left ).

↑ The current solid-physics relying on fictitious concepts **lacks** reality, and cannot be applicable to other science such as medicine.

What quantum mechanical method can calculate about **unreal** quasiparticle, electron's fake (= effective ) masses and freely-adjustable meaningless parameters ( this p.5 ) ?

This **stopgap** quantum mechanical calculation method is a very rough and inaccurate approximation callded density functional theory (= DFT ), which unrealistically treats the whole material as one fictitious electron with fake mass.

DFT replaces multi-electron potential energy by fictitious non-interacting pseudo effective potential energy called "**exchange**-correlation functional", which allegedly includes Pauli exclusion 'exchange energy', but it's just *pseudo*-Pauli energy.

Because DFT can treats only a **single** *fictitions* electron ( this p.3 ) even in many-electron materials, which has to replace the original Pauli exchange energy caused by multi-electron spins by non-interacting **pseudo**-potential energy including only **one** electron.

The forms of these pseudo-potential (= exchange-correlation functional ) are unknown, and can be freely chosen or changed in different situations and materials, so DFT without common physical potential energy's form has **No** ability to predict new physical phenomena, it always fails ( this p.17 ), hence useless.

There are No practical quantum mechanical methods to predict physical phenomena using real objects. → There is **No** evidence of strange electron 'spin'.

First of all, quantum mechanical atomic model, which was introduced as a "**stopgap** theory" 100 years ago when there were No modern computers to calculate precise many-electron motion, is intrinsically **unable** to treat many-electron atoms or molecules, no matter how we tweak quantum mechanical artificial concepts.

Each atom or molecule around us is stable in its unique ground-state (= lowest ) energy. This stable lowest total energy must always be **conserved** and *fixed* at the lowest allowable energy value, wherever electrons are moving around inside an atom or molecule.

Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics can solve only **one**-electron hydrogen atom which is the only atom whose solution successfully shows the total energy as the conserved and constant one, wherever an electron exits inside a hydrogen atom (= wavefunction ).

Solving Schrödinger equation means we can find its exact solution which gives some **constant** and fixed lowest total energy E value of an atom.

The problem is Schrödinger equation always **fails** in any multi-electron atoms except one-electron hydrogen.

Due to unphysical uncertainty principle, each electron of quantum mechanics has to always spread all over an **entire** atom as vague electron cloud where an electron can allegedly be in **any** different places using parallel worlds at once. ← **No** restriction on each electron's position, which is completely uncertain and can be everywhere in quantum mechanics.

So in multi-electron atoms or molecules expressed as quantum mechanical electron **clouds**, two electrons cannot avoid each other (= because each electron can always be **every**where ) despite repulsive Coulomb force pushing apart two electrons. ← self-**contradiction**

In this unrealistic quantum mechanical **cloud**, the distance between two electrons can take **any** values from zero (= Coulomb repulsive potential energy between two electrons increases to infinity ) to infinity (= Coulomb repulsive energy between electrons decreases to zero ), **defying** Coulomb repulsion.

These "**un**limited electrons' positions" in quantum mechanical electron clouds make it **impossible** to obtain the fixed lowest total atomic energy value by solving Schrödinger equation in multi-electron atoms.

So the total energy is **Not** conserved or constant in quantum mechanical atoms except one-electron hydrogen, hence quantum mechanics is **wrong**.

It is impossible to find exact solution, which can give the constant lowest ground state energy in Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms, which is why "stopgap" quantum mechanics cannot deal with multi-electron atoms, and it has to rely on fictitious one-electron approximation in solid physics.

Quantum mechanics claims Pauli exclusion (exchange) energy is expressed as unphysical antisymmetric wavefunction where exchanging **labels** of two electrons ( 1 ↔ 2 ) **changes** the *sign* of the whole wavefunction, which is just a artificially-introduced stopgap rule with **No** relation to our real world. ← Hence, Pauli exclusion principle is given No physical interpretation.

The only difference between "symmetric" and "antisymmetric" (= this corresponds to Pauli principle ) wavefunctions are the sign *connecting* two identical wavefunctions exchanging labels of two atoms.

The form of each term of these two types of wavefunctions is completely the **same**.

So the total energy E of both symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunctions should be completely the same, if this multi-electron Schrödinger equation has exact solution (= solvable ).

This fact is self-contradictory and **invalidating** Pauli exchange energy, because in **solvable** Schrödinger equation, the effect of Pauli principle **disappears** and becomes meaningless due to **No** difference between symmetric and antisymmetic wavefunctions' energies.

Artificial Pauli exchange energy **appears** only when Schrödinger equation can**not** be solved.

Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms can **never** be solved. ← quantum mechanics is **wrong**.

If Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms **can** be solved, → **No** difference between symmetric and antisymmetic wavefunctions' energies. → Pauli principle energy **disappears**. ← quantum mechanics is **wrong** after all.

All Schrödinger equations of multi-electron atoms are unsolvable. Hence, we have to artificially choose **fake** solution called 'basis set' to calculate fake total energy by integrating chosen wavefunction instead of solving it (= because it cannot be solved ), which quantum mechanical calculation is just "art" rather than "science".

Quantum mechanics cannot solve multi-electron Schrödinger equation. → They just choose fake solution. → Integrate chosen (antisymmetric) wavefunction. → Unphysical "Pauli exchange energy" appears in the form of "integral".

This is why unreal Pauli principle "exchange energy", which can be expressed only as unphysical **integration** of chosen **fake** solution (= antisymmetric wavefunction ) due to unsolvable Schrödinger equation, still **lacks** physical interpretation (= Pauli exchange energy can**not** be expressed as real objects ).

Two electron of quantum mechanics cannot avoid each other due to "electron cloud", which makes it impossibe to generate stable molecular bond where each negative electron has to approach another positive nucleus, **avoiding** another negative electron to cause stable molecular bond by Coulomb attraction between electrons and nuclei.

So quantum mechanical molecule based on unreal electron "probability" cloud spreading all over the place (= hence, two electrons cannot avoid each other ) has to rely on "cheating" where illegitimately lowered kinetic energy of an electron approaching another nucleus **violating** total energy conservation rule is the main (fake) generator of fictitious stable molecular bond energy by quantum mechanics.

Unphysical symmetric or antisymmetric wavefunctions and its exchange integral are exploited to enhance this illegitimately lowered (fake) kinetic energy effect by violating energy conservation law in fake quantum mechanical molecular bond.

This is why physicists cannot use these unphysical spin 'exchange energy' or Schrödinger equation in actual applied science, and they have to rely only on unreal quasiparticle model and one-pseudo-electron DFT calculation method in all solids or molecular physics.

We already **have** the excellent technology of manipulating even each single atom to develop useful nano-technology controlling many-electron nano-machines precisely which surely leads to curing deadly diseases.

But as long as we rely on the current quantum mechanical useless atomic model which intrinsically can**not** deal with multi-electron atoms, designing and utilizing **multi**-electron molecular nano-machines are **impossible** forever.

So the first thing for us to do is replace the current old unphysical quantum mechanical model by other real atomic models which can treat multi-electron atoms where many electrons are actually moving and avoiding each other.

↑ These complicated three-body problems can be dealt with precisely using the current computer technology which didn't exist when old quantum mechanics was born 100 years ago.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(V-1) ↓ 200-year-old vaccine is the only hope of * *?*

Now all countries and drugmakers are *rushing* to develop *dream*like coronavirus vaccine as the **only** hope for containing unprecedented pandemic.

But vaccine development usually takes an incredibly **long** time.

Even the mumps vaccine, which was the fastest ever approved, took four years.

**No** vaccines against the coronavirus family such as SARS and MERS succeeded so far. Rapid loss of COVID-19 antibodies indicates both herd immunity and vaccine development will be **difficult**.

In fact, basic technology of developing vaccine has **Not** progressed since Jenner first succeeded in using vaccine against smallpox more than 200 years ago.

Vaccine is very simple = inject virus antigen into body → some natural immune cells may produce antibodies against viruses. This traditional old procedure has remained **unchanged** for more than 200 years.

Antibody test and immunotherapy also use the same **old** technique of injecting antigens of viruses or cancer cells into animals, expecting their natural immune cells will produce effective antibodies. ← But in most cases, it **failed**.

The current human technology can**not** design or produce antibodies from scratch directly. All we can do is *blindly* **inject** some (virus) antigens or proteins into bodies. It is **impossible** for us to predict how immune cells respond to the injection.

Because precise atomic mechanism of human immune cells producing antobodies is still **unknown** and uncontrollable.

This is why 'unpredictable' vaccine development takes an extremely long time and may cause unexpected severe **side** effects.

And almost all vaccine development ends up in **failure**, wasting huge taxpayers' money.

Even the simplest common cold and HIV viruses are still incurable, despite a long-time research for finding "miracle drug or vaccine".

All problems boil down to the basic science = quantum mechanics that has remained unrealistic, unchanged and **stopped** all applied science such as medicine from advancing for 100 years.

Quantum mechanics is filled with "physically-contradictory" concepts such as "a particle in two places at once", rewriting the past, afterlife, negative mass, negative kinetic energy, a dead and alive cat, faster-than-light entanglement.

It's **impossible** to utilize "physically-contradictory" basic quantum mechanics for developing actual science such as medical technology, because "physically-contradictory" means quantum mechanics **lacks** reality.

Physicists turned this useless physics into a mere political tool (= extra-dimensionist ) and literature (= dark-matterist ) to sell books (= parallel-world believer ), because their pseudo-science has No practical application.

Quantum mechanics was created as the **only** atomic theory a long, long time ago when physicists couldn't use convenient modern computers. Computers are necessary to calculate **many**-body effects in **many**-electron atoms and molecules.

Without computers, it was **impossible** for physicists to establish a new atomic theory which can handle many electrons and many atoms in solids and molecules.

So quantum mechanics is intrinsically an "*impractical* atomic theory" which can**not** deal with complicated chemical or biological reactions involving many atoms and electrons.

The practical atomic theory has to deal with complicated many-electron atoms. But old quantum mechanics has No ability to deal with many-electron atoms due to lack of modern computers when quantum mechanics was formulated in 1920s, which caused many self-**contradictions** and unrealistic concepts in today's quantum physics.

Without computers, physicists had No choice but to replace realistic classical atomic model by **unreal**, unphysical electron's
spin model which is coincidentally supposed to generate the same magnetic field (= Bohr magneton ) and energy level difference as Bohr's classical orbit.

But for a very tiny electron to generate the observed strong magnetic field, each electron has to spin far faster than light unrealistically. So physicists made an **excuse** that electron "spin" does Not mean actual "spinning".

Quantum mechanics started to accept self-contradictroty and **unrealistic** concepts such as "spin" as the result of struggling to apply complicated physical phenomena to unphysical, ad-hoc theory forcibly in the **un**modernized period 100 years ago ( this p.5 ).

Basically, the **magnetic** force or energy is negligibly **smaller** and weaker than other forces such as Coulomb electric force or energy.

The magnetic force of electron spin is **Not** powerful enough to cause actual chemical or biological reaction, because its magnetic force is far weaker than Coulomb electric force, which is the main generator of physical phenomena.

But for nonphysical ad-hoc quantum mechanical theory, this **unreal** electron spin was the **only** tool available for researchers to develop their theory and explain complicated physical phenomena in old 1920s.

Because abstract unphysical spin can be simply expressed just as two kinds of arrows or math symbols without showing any concrete physical figure ( this p.2 ), which simple spin description doesn't require sophisticated modern computers.

Of course, it's impossible to describe actual complicated physical and biological reactions using only this simple, unphysical electron "spins" with magnetic force which is too weak to explain influential atomic behavior.

So physicists needed to make up other **artificial** new concepts called "exchange energy" where Pauli exclusion force is allegedly caused by nonphysical "flipped sign" by exchanging two electrons. ← **No** more detailed mechanism of how this strange "exchange energy" is generated.

This artificial and unrealistic "exchange force or energy" lacks force carriers, hence any realistic explanation of this strange Pauli exchange force or energy is impossible ( this p.6 ).

Magnetic field utilized in solids such as ferromagnet is supposed to be caused by this unreal electron "spin" with No further detailed physical explanation, except naming it "spintronics".

But as I said, the magnetic force caused by electron spin is too **weak** to generate meaningful physical phenomena such as the ferromagnetism ( this p.6 ). So the convenient, artificial "exchange force" (= **lack** physical interpretation ! ) was made up as ad-hoc **imaginary** *savior* for explaining ferromagnetic phenomenon. ← too good to be true ( this p.20 )

Quantum mechanics could **Not** explain **mulit**-electron atoms.

→ Unreal "spin" was made up in 1920s.

→ This electron spin is **Not** "real spinning", and its spin magnetic force is too **weak** to cause actual phenomena such as Pauli exclusion force and ferromagnet.

→ Another artificial, **non**physical concept ="exchange energy" was made up as an ad-hoc savior to help electron spin seemingly explain complicated physical phenomena, sacrificing its realistic interpretation.

→ All physical phenomena such as solid-physics have to be explained by unreal, artificial concepts in quantum mechanics. ← vicious cycle.

So the current condensed matter physics has to rely on unreal quasiparticle model and bogus one-pseudo-electron DFT calculation method, which unphysical quantum mechanical concepts stop our "science" from progressing now. → No dreamlike vaccine or drug can be developed.

Physicists **hate** "ambiguous" situation. They always **crave** "some answer", formulation, reason or common physical principle, even if these principles are **unreal**, artificial and unrelated to our real world.

So physicists were Not allowed to halt developing their ad-hoc theory or hypothesis, just because modern computers necessary to calculate actual many-body physical phenomena were unavailable in 1920s. → Contradictory quantum mechanics had to be made up.

Unphysical theory needed to create other unphysical theories to proceed.

Therefore, physicists made up another artificial, **un**physical rule called "symmetry" only to develop their ad-hoc theory, which "symmetry" has **nothing** to do with our real world.

Under this artificial principle called symmetry, particle physicists started to claim many (fictional) particles might be created with the help of imaginary virtual particles only inside artificial circumstances such as particle colliders.

These unstable, **unseen** elementary particles are just **illusion**, as shown in the fact that the only purpose of the current miserable particle physics is to get taxpayers' money for meaningless gigantic colliders, while many people are *suffering* from unprecedented economic recession by pandemic.

And all other physicists also had No choice but to **escape** from reality, and seek "**imaginary** scientific targets" such as **fictional** parallel-world quantum computer, black hole, BigBang, multiverse, unseen dimensions as "theory of everything" in vain.

These **fantasy** basic physics is the reason why the current medical technology **stalls** and old-fashioned vaccine is still the **only** *hope* for tackling viruses. ← Strong evidence that science makes No progress recently.

Quantum mechanics introduced in 1920s when there were No modern computers to calculate complicated many-electron atoms or molecules, so quantum mechanics is intrinsically **unable** to deal with many-body effect or many-electron atoms, molecules, proteins. ← Drug development is intrinsically **impossible** by quantum mechanics.

So physicists needed to make up artificial circumstances and concepts such as unrealistic "spin" and quasiparticle to seemingly handle many-electron atoms or molecules which are intrinsically impossible to handle by quantum mechanics.

But once even this unrealistic quantum mechanics was accepted as the only ( ad-hoc ) atomic theory and got prestigious Nobel prizes, academia desperately tries to *protect* these **pseudo**-science only for sticking to their academic **status**, even by spreading deadly viruses, endangering people's lives in "dictatorial school" system.

So the first thing for us to do for containing deadly viruses is replace old useless quantum mechanical atomic model by new real one that can treat many-electron atoms using realistic particles with No self-contradiction or unreal spin, which calculation needs computers.

This practical approach to apply basic physics to drug development was impossible for old quantum mechanical model, which was introduced 100 years ago and already **contaminated** with many artificial, irreparable **fictitious** concepts such as quasiparticles, spin and fake mass model.

This is why Microsoft, Gates foundation = ardent supporter of vaccine, is also promoting the impossible dream of creating **unscientific** parallel-world quantum computer using fictional quasiparticle which **pseudo**-basic physics **prevents** them from clarifying deeper atomic mechnism of virus infection and immune response to produce effective, safe vaccine.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ Defund quantum mechanics with unreal * *!*

Still **No** cure for deadly coronaviruses.

All attempts to find miracle drugs have failed.

There is a growing risk of 2nd and 3rd waves of the coronavirus outbreak, as next winter gets closer. Strict social distancing **cripples** economy.

No guarantee that very old **primitive** approach = vaccine, which development usually takes an extremely long time, will work.

All diseases including viruses invade human bodies and spread through "**atomic** or molecular interaction". So **elucidating** atomic mechanism will surely lead to finding effective drugs or treatments.

But quantum mechanics, which is the only atomic theory for now, devotes all its time and energy into "**fantasy** things" such as parallel worlds, an object in two places at once, fake quasi-particles with **unreal** mass.

Therefore, **replacing** fictional and useless quantum mechanics by other real atomic models is the first thing to do to develop an innovative treatment for deadly diseases.

Why is quantum mechanics so unrealistic ?

What made its solid-physics so **useless** as to be avoided by biology and medical researchers ?

An electron shows both particle and wave nature.

An electron is obviously a negatively charged particle moved by Coulomb electric force.

At the same time, an electron is de Broglie wave which interference was actually observed in many experiments, and this electron as de Broglie wave is necessary for determining quantized atomic energy levels, which were also precisely measured and support de Broglie wave theory.

Quantum mechanics uses both these electron particle and de Broglie wave for its calculation. But its Schrödinger **wave** function is nothing but a nonphysical, abstract "wave" which contains **No** clear electron particle.

This quantum "wavefunction" is referred to as a vague electron cloud spreading all over space, obscuring the electron's position, motion and shape, using uncertainty principle as an excuse.

So quantum mechanics **failed** to describe each electron as a real particle or wave in detail, stuck in its disastrous unrealistic atomic picture, which still nobody understands.

A "particle" and "wave" are completely **different** objects *incompatible* with each other due to their completely different physical properties which can **never** coexist in one object.

So it's impossible that an electron is both a particle and wave, or we need other realistic explanation.

If physicists want to treat an electron as "wave", they can use only **non**physical "wavefunction" **without** clear electron particles as long as they believe in quantum mechanics.

And when they want to treat an electron as a particle, only "**fictitious**" particles can be used to explain their particle-like behavior and interaction.

For this fictitious "particle" interaction model without wave, quantum mechanics uses "unreal, virtual particles" which cannot be expressed by any real classical particles.

To explain electrons interacting with each other via Coulomb electric force and virtual particles, quantum mechanics uses abstract, nonphysical Feynman diagram, which tells us **nothing** about detailed mechanism of how "electron particles" interact with each other via "unreal virtual photons" with imaginary mass ( this p.3 ).

An electron and a photon (= a fictitious quantum particle of light wave ) are expressed just as **non**physical math **symbols** ( electron or photon = a^{†}, b^{†}, c^{†} .. = math symbols ) with **No** concrete physical shape, which tells us **nothing** about how particles touch or interact with each other in detail.

Because those abstract math symbols contain **No** information about particle's shape, property or position except for abstract math symbols. = Unrealistic quantum mechanics tries to **avoid** clarifying deeper truth or mechanism of particle-wave mystery forever.

In solid physics, quantum mechanics claims superconductivity is caused by an exchange of "virtual phonon quasiparticle" which is an unreal, **fictitious** particle with **fake** mass and charge.

Each superconductor or solid contains many atoms and electrons.

So the realistic atomic model should describe the superconductor as one consisting of **many** real electrons and nuclei interacting with each other via Coulomb force and de Broglie wave.

But unrealistic quantum mechanics, which can**not** treat **many**-electron solids or superconductors as they are, describe the supercoductor using only several nonphysical math symbols (= superconductor = a^{†}a, which symbols mean fictitious electron or quasiparticle allegedly representing the whole superconductor ).

To develop the theory using only nonphysical math symbols as fictitious particles, quantum mechanics has to artificially prepare other unreal **quasiparticles** as a means to explain various physical phenomena of superconductivity ( this p.12, this p.4 ). ← nonsense.

This unreal quasiparticle model, which was introduced a century ago, is still used as the only tool to explain superconductor and solid physics, and got even Nobel prize ( this p.8 ) which prestigious prizes, after all, just obstruct our innovation by their fake science now.

So in order to explain new physical phenomena, all quantum mechanics
can do is artificially increase "new unreal quasiparticles" which are also expressed just as **non**physical math symbols ( this p.6 ) and tell us **nothing** about detailed mechanism of how these unreal quasiparticles interact with real particles. ← Meaningless, **useless** model.

As shown here, if quantum mechanics tries to explain physical phenomena using only "**particles**", it has to rely on **unreal** *virtual* particles and quasi-particles which **un**physical atomic model can **never** be applied to **other** fields such as medicine or drug discovery.

How about "**wave**"-like description of physical phenomena by quantum mechanics ?

Unfortunately, quantum mechanics also has to rely on **unreal** physical concepts, even when it uses "wave".

Quantum mechanics describes the whole solid or semiconductor as "**band** model" which consists of several **non**physical band-like "**waves**" which allegedly spread over the whole solid.

Each band is a mere "line" showing only energy and momentum (= **No** position ) of fictitious quasi-electron with unreal (= effective ) mass which artificial mass can be freely and unrealistically **changed** from the original free electron mass in different directions or even be negative mass ( this p.6 ).

So each **quasi**-electron spreads over the whole solid as nonphysical "**band** (= each band allegedly shows an average energy level )" with **No** definite position or shape of a particle ( this p.4 ).
The curvature of this band is supposed to represent **fictitious** electron's effective **mass**.

This quantum mechanical band model can **neither** designate each electron's position nor show how multiple particle-like electrons interact with each other. Then, how can this **non**physical band model describe actual various physical phenomena ?

In this band model, "one single **fictitious** *quasi*-electron" spreading over the whole solid (= hence, this fake electron has No definite position, like a ghost ) allegedly represents the rough "average" effect of all electrons inside the solid. ← Too **rough** approximation to use in actual science.

Physicists invented easy but **unreasonable** approximate calculation method called density functional theory (= DFT or Kohn-Sham theory ) to fit this band model artificially.

DFT forcibly replaced real **many**-electron solids by "**fictitious** one-electron wavefunction model" with unreal (= effective ) **pseudo**-potential energy called exchange-correlation functional.

The accurate form of this effective pseudo-potential (= electron-correlation functional ) is unknown and can be freely chosen, so DFT has No ability to predict new physical phenomena.

Because DFT just **chooses** *convenient* artificial **pseudo**-potential and "adjusts" the free parameters, the form of this pseudo-potential and wavefunction (= fake chosen solution ) to experimental values. ← Meaningless model.

No matter what this fictitious pseudo-potential functional is invented, someone will always find the case where it **fails** ( this p.17 ). DFT calculation results are often **bad**, and disagree with quantum mechanical band model's energy gap values.

If there is another useful atomic model replacing quantum mechanics, this realistic atomic model must express each electron or solid using real particle and wave instead of unreal virtual or quasi-particles **without** any contradicton or mystery, and explain many-electron solids as they are (= explain many-electron solids using **many** real electrons as they are ).

Quantum mechanical atomic model, which is based on **unreal** virtual particles, quasiparticles with **fake** (= effective) mass and **one**-*pseudo*-electron DFT calculation method, cannot be used as a useful, realistic atomic model or tool in applied science such as medicine, because **actual** science has to deal with materials containing "many-electrons" **realistically**.

Now humans already have the excellent technology of manipulating each single atom one by one and measuring its atomic force precisely.

But each time physicists measure a single atom or molecule using state-of-the-art atomic force microscopy, quantum mechanics can only treat atoms as fictitious quasiparticle model with **fake** mass, and try to treat actual **multi**-electron atoms or solids as **one**-*fake*-electron DFT model, which failed quantum mechanical model can never be applied to actual nano-technology dealing with many "real" electrons.

So as long as we **refuse** to replace 100-year-old useless, unrealistic quantum mechanical model by other real new one, the development of our science and effective drugs for deadly diseases is **impossible** *forever*.

For 100 years, quantum mechanics has just tried to express actual complicated many-electron material as **non**physical bands where each electron and fictitious quasiparticle are expressed as nonphysical math symbols (= ex. an electron is expressed only as an abstract math symbol = c^{†} ) with No physical figure except unreal "spin" which tells us nothing about detailed mechanism of what's going on inside materials.

And its free parameters and fictitious electron effective mass are artifically **adjusted** to fit experimental results like artificial form of DFT pseudo-potential and quasiparticle model ( this p.5, this p.2 ), which is just useless, cannot predict any new physical phenomena, as long as it depends on **unrealistic** physical concepts such as quasiparticle and effective mass.

Now physicists such as Witten seem to be obsessed **only** with irrelevant "politics", forgetting **scientific** research, because their so-called "science" such as extra-dimensions, astronomy and parallel worlds are just fiction, and it will **never** be put to practical use.

So the current so-called "science" based on **fictional** quantum mechanics is nothing but a "**political** tool" or literature just to sell books. ← **No** practical use.

"Defund fake science" instead of "defund the police" is what we should do first.

Academia should stop using racial issue to pressure gorvernments into spending more taxpayers' money in their fake science in the name of education, which will just further increase college tuition and ruin students' future by their **useless** science.

Each time scientists detect some 'slight signals', which is too week to affect our daily life, so **useless**, they like to claim these might indicate the existence of new particles or matter, though these are **illusion**. ← It's about time to end this "*vicious*" practice of academia pretending so-called "science discovery" using **meaninglessly** too weak signals.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ Fictional atomic model in *

The current "science" theory is worthless, **losing** touch with reality.

COVID-19 viruses are still spreading in the world, and the science can **never** find a cure for those deadly diseases, exposing its uselessness.

Even renowned peer-reviewd journals spread false information without shame about recent hydroxychloroquine, **losing** credibility.

WHO often made contradictory comments, confusing people.

Why did WHO with ample funds and "scientists" take so much time to find even the very simple and obvious fact that "mask" is effective ?

People started to **doubt** the so-called "experts" spreading false information and "science", which the climate activist, Greta often touted.

If academia tries to use racial issue to "defund the police" and divert the money to their "**fake** science" such as **illusory** extra-dimensions, parallel worlds, fictional cosmology and black hole in the name of "education", it is **unjustifiable**.

The main reason why the current "science" is pursuing only **fiction** and useless in medicine originates in the fact that the current basic physics has stubbornly rejected real physical objects for 100 years.

The **only** tool to express the behavior of atoms and electrons is unphysical Schrödinger equation. Its wave function has **No** ability to decide whether each electron is a particle or wave. ← nonsense.

Schrödinger wave function cannot even show the position and velocity of each particle, using fishy uncertainty principle as an excuse.

First of all, a particle and wave are completely different things in not only their shapes but also properties. So it is impossible that a particle and wave contradicting each other coexist inside the same physical object such as an electron and a photon.

An particle must be an unbreakable "round-shaped" object.

Wave is dividable, able to **split** into multiple smaller waves to cause interference.

So in double-slit experiment, unphysical quantum mechanics has to rely on fantasy parallel worlds where each unbreakable electron ( or a photon ) **appears** to "split" into its two **doppelgangers** in two parallel worlds, pass through two slits simultaneously, and interfere with itself.

Therefore, accepting the unrealistic quantum mechanical view that each electron can be both a particle and wave **requires** other unrealistic concepts such as fantasy "parallel worlds". ← vicious cycle.

Whether an electron has a particle-like shape or wave-like shape is **uncertain**. → Hence, the detailed mechanism of how a particle-like electron or photon interferes with its "doppelganger particle" like wave is an **unsolvable** mystery, forever. ← Science makes No more progress, stuck in two *conflicting* concepts of a particle and wave.

Science **stops** progressing, and scientists can do **nothing** in this unphysical, unimaginable and contradictory quantum mechanics which offers **No** basic information about the object's shape, size or property. ← **No** useful tools. But everybody stops exploring deeper truth.

The smallest fundamental physical object = an electron is essential to explain all physical phenomena as a **tool**. But quantum mechanics tells us **nothing** about the clear electron's shape or nature, hence, it **prevents** us from using electrons as essential tools in applied science forever.

Quantum mechanical "uncertain" wavefunction forces us to accept ridiculous idea that each electron "particle" must always spread over all space like "wave" which allegedly represents the "probability" of finding an electron in each place covered by wave function.

It means each object or an electron can be in multiple different places at once like ghost. ← This "fantasy" world is the consequence of absurd uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.

So according to quantum mechanics, each electron can exist in two different orbits or energy states simultaneously, like a fictional cat which can be dead and alive at the same time using different parallel worlds.

Actually, these quantum mechanical parallel worlds are unrealistic and **useless**, as shown in fishy quantum computer and information which try to exploit **illusory** parallel worlds for its fake speed-up and remain impractical forever.

Whether each electron is a particle or wave is uncertatin

→ Each electron's physical shape and nature is uncertain.

→ We can**not** utilize such a **ghost**-like electron whose "everything" is uncertain in actual science as a physical tool.

An electron as a negatively-charged particle can avoid other negatively-charged electron due to Coulomb repulsion. On the other hand, if an electron is vague wave spreading as electron cloud, the wave-like electron cannot avoid other electrons despite the repulsion between electrons.

Because the "**wave**-like electron" must always exist "everywhere" (= so this electron cannot move or avoid like a normal particle. = unrealistic ! ) covered by wavefunction which allegedly expresses the vague probability of finding an electron in each place.

**Wherever** the amplitude of wavefunction (= probability of an electron ) is not zero, the electron always has a chance of **appearing**.

→ An electron can be in **all** places at once, wherever its wavefunction spreads.

If electrons can**not** avoid other electrons due to its "**wave**-like" shape and absurd uncertainty principle rule, they cannot explain actual multi-electron atoms or molecular behavior where multiple electrons must always be moving and **avoiding** each other due to Coulomb *repulsion* in order to decrease their total **energy**.

So it's impossible for unrealistic wave-like electrons which can**not** avoid each other to **keep** their total energy down to the lowest **ground**-state energy, obeying energy conservation law.

→ Quantum mechanics has to use "illogical cheating" (= violation of energy conservation law ) to obtain energies of multi-electron atoms or molecules.

This is why Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms cannot be solved (= only choosing fake solution and energy is possible, it's like an "art", Not science ), which means correct description of real multi-electron atoms or molecules is impossible in quantum mechanics.

An electron acting like a "negatively charged particle" moving and avoiding other negative electrons is the established **fact** confirmed in many experiments.

Each electron is also known to behave as "de Broglie **wave**" which interference was actually observed in many experiments.

Two *conflicting* concepts of a particle and wave can**not** coexist.

We have to **choose** one of them, though even this "realistic choice" is **forbidden** in uncertain quantum mechanics which **gave up** clarifying deeper truth.

The only realistic idea with **No** contradictory wave-particle duality is that an electron should be accepted as a "**particle**" moving through some "medium" where de Broglie "**wave**" is actually produced as real *wave* **around** the particle-like electron.

This realistic atomic model accepting electrons as real particles and treating de Broglie wave as one generated **around** electrons failed to calculate mult-electron atoms such as helium, though this model is the only **right** answer.

Because physicists had No modern computers to calculate complicated multi-electrons' motion = three-body problem in multi-electron atoms in 1920s when they had to choose unrealistic quantum mechanics to continue their research.

Each **wave** consists of two phases of "crest" and "trough", one of which must envelop an electron particle which is kicked out in the case of destructive interference where the crest and trough wave phases crash.

So distinguishing between the crest and trough phases of each electron de Broglie wave is essential to describe actual atomic behavior, but its distinction is **impossible** in quantum mechanical wave function.

Quantum mechanical wavefunction can**not** *designate* the position of electron, hence, each electron must exist everywhere inside wavefunction which cannot distinguish two phases; crest or trough (= only in one of these two phases, an electron should exist ) of de Broglie wave.

This is also one of serious problems of quantum mechanics which cannot describe actual interference mechanism in a realistic wave (= the trough and crest of the electron de Broglie wave **overlap** → destructive interference → An electron is expelled ).

Therefore, quantum mechanics had No choice but to **dismiss** real wave picture, and its interference mechanism remains **uncertain** forever, which led to the present **fantasy** quantum mechanical world.

Especially in multi-electron atoms such as helium, we **must** consider **interference** of mutiple electrons' de Broglie waves, which realistic view consistent with actually observed experimental facts is impossible in quantum mechanical nonphysical wavefunction.

Therefore, quantum mechanics has to adopt unphysical spin and contradictory, **uncanny** Pauli exclusion principle which physical mechanism and the origin of Pauli exclusion force are still uncertain **mystery** ( this p.6 ) like a **ghost** phenomenon with No force or its force carriers.

Quantum mechanics **dismissed** "realistic atomic picture" in **all** materials.

It expresses each solid or crystal as an "**non**physical band model"
which contains **No** real electrons with definite physical shape, hence, whether an electron is a particle or wave remains uncertain also in this band model.

The slope of the band is said to express **fake** (= effective ) mass of fictitious electrons ( this p.15 ). Surprisingly, this fake mass of a crystal electron can be unrealistically negative. ← ridiculous.

Quantum mechanics and physicists have to rely on unreal "quasiparticle" with fake mass and charge to explain all physical phenomena of material, solid, crystal, superconductor, fictitious computer..

Quasiparticles are also "**ghost**-like" particles with No definite physical shape (= whether a quasiparticle is particle or wave is uncertain, too ), they are expressed as nonphysical, abstract math symbols which tell us nothing about detailed atomic behavior of quasiparticles inside materials.

Dark history of unrealistic quantum mechanics is

A particle or wave is **uncertain** in quantum mechanics → Many-electron solids or crystals cannot be expressed by real particles or waves. → **Unreal** quasiparticle and band model must be used to describe physical phenomena in quantum mechanics. ← Science **stops** progressing now.

In quantum mechanics where a paticle or wave is **unknown**, each paticle's physical shape and property is unknown, the mechanism of how particles touch and **interact** with other particles ( or wave ) is unknown, too.

So in quantum mechanics, all particle interactions are expressed as **non**physical, abstract "Feynman diagram" which also tells us **nothing** about each particle's concrete shape, property and how particles interact with each other. ← physically **meaningless**.

Feynman diagram always includes ghost-like **virtual** particle with unreal mass as "**virtual** mediators" of all interactions and forces.

Quantum mechanics **discarded** realistic particle picture of all atoms and solid physics, then, its particle physics **lacks** physical reality, too.

Under unreal virtual and quasiparticle model, all quantum mechanics can do is increase more fictional elementary particles. Unseen quarks with fractional-charge, virtual weak (and Z ) bosons and God-particle Higgs.. are all unobservable, **illusory** particles which are **unnecessary** for our daily life.

All these doubtful particles except real electrons and protons are too **short**-lived to observe directly. ← Isolating those too unstable particles from colliders is much more **impossible**.

Instead of directly catching new particles, physicsts just "**claim**" very slight "sign" of illusory quarks, weak boson, Higgs might be detected after just analysing "**garbage**, meaingless data" of final particles into which unstable illusory particles are said to decay inside particle colliders.

Discovery of new particles (= physicists just claim it with No 'tangible' evidence ) is just meaningless, as long as we are **unable** to isolate those too unstable particles from colliders to use them in our actual daily life.

Therefore, it's safe to say all these ghost-like virtual particles such as quarks, weak boson and Higgs, which are neither isolated nor directly confirmed, are **unreal**. We have No troubles even without those ghost-like elementary particles.

Sadly, the **only** purpose of the current particle physics is to get taxpayers' money for building more meaningless gigantic colliders, which would just **destroy** environment.

Of course, all those doubtful particles allegedly poping out for only a extremely short time inside colliders have No concrete physical figure, they are expressed just as nonphysical math symbols like other fictitious virtual and quasiparticles.

Quantum mechanics is unphysical → Even whether each object is a particle or wave is uncertatin → Solid physics is **disaster** relying on unreal quasiparticle and band model with No real physical picture. → No useful physical tools in quantum mechanics. → All the current applied science **stops** progressing.

→ All particle interactions are expressed using ghost-like virtual particles. → Because the current physics can**not** delve into deeper real mechanism using real particles.

→ Physicists started to pursue only **illusory** particles such as quarks, Higgs, supersymmetry after artificially creating "**virtual** circumstances" such as colliders, which has **nothing** to do with our real world.

Particle physicists are allowed to tell lies, saying those fictitious elementary particles might exist only for an extremely short time, using the fact that those ghost-like particles are too short-lived to isolate from colliders. ← **Nobody** can confirm their true existence, too good to be true.

In the same way, astronomers are allowed to claim (fictional) black hole, worm hole, dark energy, dark matter might be "found" in the very **distant** universe which is too **far** away from the earth to confirm.

← **Nobody** can confirm their true existence, too good to be true.

Quantum mechanics is unreal → Solid-physics is useless filled with unreal quasiparticles → Physicists pursue only "**fictional** particles" in particle colliders. → Astronomers also pursue fictional black holes, Big Bang, dark energy .. far off in the universe. ← All is **illusion**.

So the current "science" makes **No** progress, stuck in fiction in **all** fields from solid and particle physics to cosmology.

And the final goal of those **fictional** physics is unified theory or "theory of everything" where physicists just "fantasize" about illusory extra-dimensions, which can never be observed or utilized in our daily life, so meaningless science.

So, quantum mechanics dismissed real particle and wave picture. → Imaginary parallel-worlds theory emerged ← Wasting money in useless parallel-world quantum computer and information, because the current solid-physics relying on unreal quasiparticle model is inapplicable to actual science or medicine.

→ Physicists pursue illusory quarks, virtual particles, Higgs. → Astronomers also pursue fictional black holes, expanding universe, dark matter and energy in vain. →**All** "science" fields **stop** progressing now.

In conclusion, the first thing for us to do for advancing "practical science" is to replace nonphysical quantum mechanics by real atomic model based on real particle and wave things with **definite** physical figure, which can surely explain all actual physical phenomena and solid physics using only real particles and wave without fictitious virtual or quasiparticles.

Otherwise, the current physics is **useless** and meaningless except for selling "sci-fi" books in amazon or political tools.

See this week physics is still useless.

See previous version of criticizing top journals.

2020/6/19 updated. Feel free to link to this site.