*(Fig.1) ↓ Real electron and wave vs. Unreal quantum mechanics.*

Why is quantum mechanics so **unrealistic** as to embrace many *fictional* concepts such as parallel worlds ?

Why did physicists 100 years ago have to choose such a crazy, **wrong** quantum mechanics as the **phony** atomic theory ?

When and why were we forced to discard realistic atomic model and accept unrealistic quantum mechanics **against** our will ?

Countless experiments demonstrated that an electron is undoubtedly a negatively charged particle moved by Coulomb electric field.

An electron is also known to have wave nature, and **interfere** with itself in double-slit experiments. This electron's wave is known to be de Broglie wave.

↑ From the **realistic** perspective, we have to separate two **conflicting** concepts of a particle and wave into two **different** objects with different shapes and qualities.

But the paradoxical quantum mechanics has tried to make a **failed** attempt to reconcile two **irreconcilable** concepts of a partcile and wave (= which two notions are completely different in both shapes and qualities ! ), causing still-**unsolvable** paradoxes and mysteries such as the **contradictory** wave-particle duality.

This contradictory quantum mechanical "**mixed** wave-and-particle duality" caused other fantasy concepts such as quantum superposition where each electron can allegedly exist in any different places simultaneously like a single cat can be dead and alive simultaneously living in fictional parallel worlds. ← nonsense.

After all, the miserable (unsuccessful) quantum mechanics avoids clarifying the detailed underlying physical mechanism of whether each electron or photon is a particle or wave, because there is **No** physical reality or meaning in this **paradoxical** quantum mechanical world ( this p.2, this p.8-lower ).

Contradictory quantum mechanics **forces** physicists to give up exploring deeper true atomic mechanisms, reluctantly saying "Nobody undersdands quantum mechanics !" which "**unscientific**" attitude **stopping** delving into truth underlying mechanisms prevents scientists from advancing real applied science forever, now.

So unphysical quantum mechanicsl is completely an **un**successful theory which cannot predict or explain any physical values, **contrary** to the media-hype.

On the other hand, the realistic Bohr's atomic model could successfully explain all experimental values of all hydrogen-like atomic energy levels using the experimentally-observed real electron charged "particle" and de Broglie "wave" theory by **separating** a particle and wave **eliminating** the quantum mechanical wave-particle **paradoxes**.

Light or electromagnetic **wave**, which can interfere, diffract, travel at constant speeds ( depending on different mediums ), is clearly "wave (= Not a rigid particle )" like other waves such as sound waves. ← There is No such thing as a photon particle.

In the Bohr's realistic atomic model treating each particle and wave as "real objects" with No paradoxes, when an electron's orbital length is just an integral multiple of de Broglie wavelength in order to avoid destructive interference and stabilize electron's orbital motion, this realistic atomic model just agreed with experimental values.

The **mis**conception that classical atomic model may be unstable, losing energy was created later for academia to intentionally draw people's attention from **realistic** Bohr's atom to **unrealistic** quantum mechanics which ad-hoc theory did **Not** even explain why quantum mechanical orbit could be stable at all.

Actually, Bohr's realistic model was **accepeted** as *real* by the 'then academia', and obtained the most prestigious Nobel prize in 1920s.

The misleading idea that an orbiting electron is losing energy applies only to the case where **many** electrons (= **Not** the case of a **single** electron moving inside a hydrogen atom ) are randomly oscillating and pushing each other in a **disorderly** way.

If a single electron is really losing energy just by moving around the nucleus as textbooks say, quantum mechanical electron, which also has kinetic energy (= so "moving" electron ), has to be unstable, losing energy, too. ← This logic of losing energy is self-**contradictory**.

Actually, this moving electron losing energy applies **only** to the case when the single electron **unrealistically** consists of "an **infinite** number of "*imaginary* charge **pieces**" smaller than a single electron", which is Not the case, a single electron cannot break into smaller pieces, so Bohr's atomic electron does Not lose energy just by orbiting aroud the nucleus.

Opponents of realistic atomic model assume an **unrealistic** case where Coulomb repulsive energy generated by putting "*imaginary* infinite smaller charge pieces" together as one **pseudo**-electron particle is stored as vacuum electric field energy around the pseudo-electron, which imaginary electron easily breaks into smaller negatively-charged pieces (= which doesn't actually happen ), radiating the stored repulsive energy among those negative smaller charges.

↑ These imaginary negative charge pieces smaller than an electron do Not exist as shown in the fact that a single electron does Not break into smaller pieces, hence quantum mechanical physicists' objection to the former realistic atomic model is **absurd**, based on a **wrong** assumption.

Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics also uses the **same** idea as Bohr model that orbital length is an integer multiple of de Broglie wavelength ( this last ), and its results agreed with Bohr model's energy levels and radius.

The big difference is the hydrogen atom of Schrödinger equation always has to include **unrealistic** zero orbital angular momentum, which means the quantum mechanical electon always crashes into a nucleus, becoming **unstable**.

For unreal quantum mechanical electron of zero orbital angular momentum to generate the same magnetic field as Bohr's atomic magneton, quantum mechanics proposed **unrealistic** electron spin which must spin faster-than-light to generate its spin angular momentum.

A particle and wave are completely **different** things in terms of their shapes and properties, which can **never** be merged as one **chimera**-like pseudo-object expressed as quantum mechanical unphysical wave function.

Realistic atomic model which rationally **separates** an electron particle from de Broglie wave around the electron ( this ① model ), does Not need to mix two **conflicting** objects: particle and wave as one **ghost**-like wave function, hence, the realistic atomic model faces **No** self-contradiction or mystery plaguing quantum mechanics for a long time.

Quantum mechanics is so **unrealistic** that still Nobody can understand even after 100 years have passed since its foundation. ← Only this strange fact is enough to disprove quantum mechanics.

Because it just irrationally mixes two *conflicting* concepts of an electron "**particle**" and its de Broglie "*wave*" as **one** unphysical chimeric wave function which is neither a real wave **nor** a moving particle.

The wave function is said to have No physical meaning except for ad-hoc "probability" of finding an electron in each place.

The electron's **un**physical probability wave function always spreads throughout **all** of space, which means each **single** electron also must *spread* and exist in **all** different positions *simultaneously* using **fantasy** parallel worlds.

Quantum mechanical electron is so **crazy** that it must be unrealistically and **un**scientifically **both** a particle and wave at the **same** time, and split into multiple parallel universes to interfere with itself in two-slit experiment.

In realistic atomic model, an electron does Not need to split into two **fantasy** parallel worlds embraced by quantum mechanics to interfere with itself, because only de Broglie **wave** around each electron needs to **split** in two slit experment and interfere with each other (= which result affects an electron particle motion, causing an interference fringes ) like other real wave.

*(Fig.2) ↓ Computing two real electrons was impossible in 1920s.*

Quantum mechanics is riddled with **fantasy** concepts such as parallel worlds, a dead and alive cat. Why did scientists have to accept such a **ridiculous** atomic theory ?

Bohr's realistic atomic model, which successfully explained all one-electron atoms and ions, couldn't give true ground state energy of two-electron helium atoms.

The simplest circular-orbit helium model didn't agree with actual helium energy, because it didn't consider destructive interference of two electrons' de Broglie waves.

Other realistic helium models with two actually moving electrons repelling and avoiding each other were so complicated that they needed modern computers (= modern computers did Not exist in 1920s when the unscientific quantum mechanics was born ) to calculate, this calculation corresponds to infamous three-body problem, which was **impossible** to calculate only with old-fashioned *pen* and paper approach in physics in 1920s.

This is the main reason why physicists had No choice but to start to use **fantasy** quantum mechanics whose physical meaning is still Not understood by any physicists even now, strangely.

Contrary to the media's false narrative of 'successful' quantum mechanics, its **un**physical calculation tool called Schrödinger equation has No exact solution (= cannot be solved ) in any **multi**-electron atoms or molecules except for one-electron hydrogen atom, whose hydrogen energy solutions "accidentally" agreed with successful Bohr's atomic model.

Physicists just artificially "choose" **fake** solutions called trial functions ( or basis set ) and integrate Schrödinger equation with those chosen fake solutions ( instead of solving Schrödinger equation, because it cannot be solved ) to get **fake** total energy for multi-electron atoms.

You can artificially **choose** any forms of those fake Schrödinger solutions for multi-electron atoms. There is No restriction on what forms of trial wave functions physicists choose as fake solutions for multi-electron atoms. You can freely pick it up out of infinite choices, which is a kind of art rather than science.

We rigorously prove Schrödinger equations for multi-electron atoms such as two-electron helium can **never** find their exact solutions (= conserving the constant total energy regardless of electrons' positions is needed to be true solutions of Schrödinger equations, which condition is impossible except for one-electron hydrogen atom ), no matter what forms of fake solutions physicists choose, or no matter how much time they take to try to find true solutions out of infinite choices.

The fact that there are No true solutions of Schrödinger equation for multi-electron atoms means quantum mechanics is intrinsically a **wrong** theory.

*(Fig.3) ↓ No Coulomb force between two quantum wavefunctions.*

Quantum mechanics tries to combine two hydrogen atom wave functions (= hydrogen atomic ground state H 1s orbital wave function ) and **choose** it as an approximate hydrogen molecule (= H2 ) **fake** wave function (= solution ).

This hydrogen atomic electron wave function (= which allegedly represents an electron's charge thinly **spread** throughout all space as vague probability density cloud ) is symmetrically and spherically surrounding the central positive nucleus.

This electron's fictitious charge cloud symmetrically distributed around the central nucleus is just **equal** to a collection of symmetrical spherical-shell charges, which can be treated as if a negative electron point-charge (= e- ) **overlaps** the central positive nucleus (= e+ ) at exactly the **same** position.

So the **net** *charge* combining quantum mechanical electron-charge cloud and the central positive nucleus becomes just **zero** = electrically *neutral*, which can **neither** attract the other hydrogen atom nor form hydrogen molecule.

An electrically-**neutral** particle can**not** attract other particles or form molecular bond by Coulomb electric force, which unrealistic state is quantum mechanical molecules represented by wave function.

On the other hand, if we treat each electron as an "actually-**moving** negative **particle** (= instead of vaguely-*spreading* electron *cloud* )", the moving electron **particle** can normally and easily form a molecular bond by negative electrons being attracted to positive nuclei, avoiding other negative electrons, **obeying** real Coulomb attractive and respultive **forces**, as seen in the successful Bohr's atomic model.

Basically, two identical hydrogen atomic wave functions have exactly the same symmetrical charge distribution (= if one hydrogen atom is slightly positive or neutral seen from the other atom, another identical hydrogen atom is also slightly positive or neutral seen from the other atom ), so those identical atoms with exactly the same "charge distribution" can **never** form molecular bonds using real Coulomb electric force.

To form hydrogen molecular bond by real Coulomb force, one hydrogen atom must be negatively charged, and another hydrogen atom must be positively charged seen from each other. It means when one hydrogen atom is negatively-charged (= which means this hydrogen's negative electron approaches the other nucleus ), the other hydrogen atom must be positively-charged by exposing positive nucleus to the other atomic electron.

So quantum mechanics, which can**not** even utilize real Coulomb *force* in binding two atoms for molecular bonds, is intrinsically a **wrong** theory **detached** from real world.

In order to form molecular bonds, quantum mechanical molecules have to rely on unrealistic exchange energy (= integral ) instead of normal Coulomb forces (= Coulomb energy integral ), which **pseudo-exchange** energies just unrealistically manipulate pseudo-electron's kinetic energies (= by placing a single electron in two different atoms using fantasy quantum mechanical parallel worlds, this p.2, this p.3 ) to seemingly generate **fake** molecular bond energies by violating energy conservation law.

↑ Quantum mechanical (fake) molecules **against** the fundamental physical principle by violating energy conservation law are unrealistic and false.

If you want to use quantum mechanical electron cloud spreading all over the place as a small moving electron or as a localized particle which can approach the other positive nucleus and avoid the other negative electron, the spreading electron cloud must **shrink** and get localized only to **one** particular position as an **acute**, *narrower* probability wave function.

For an electron cloud to shrink and be **localized** only to **one** position (= only on the left **or** right side of the nucleus ), those electron clouds (= meaning "probability" of finding an electron ) must be distributed "asymmetrically" only on the left or right side of the nucleus, instead of the original hydrogen atomic wave function symmetrically distributed around the nucleus (= which symmetrical electron's charge distribution becomes a neutral charge overlapping the central nucleus, hence, cannot form molecular bond by Coulomb attraction. )

If they try to localize the originally-symmetrical electron's cloud or wave function to one particular position "asymmetrically" around the nucleus, the spreading electron cloud (= "probability" wave function ) needs to get narrower and **shrink** only to one particular position where an electron should exist.

But the narrower and sharper shrunken electron probability wavefunction drastically **increases** the electron's **kinetic** energy, which makes it **impossible** to form molecular bond by lowering total energy canceled out by increased kinetic energy.

Because quantum mechanical wavefunction also contains information about the electron's momentum (= narrower probability wave function → **shorter** de Broglie wavelength, which is a reciprocal of electron's momentum → electron's momentum and kinetic energy **increase** drastically ).

As a result, unphysical quantum mechanical wave function, which unrealistically mixes two conflicting things = an electron particle (= as vague "probability" ) and wave (= as de Broglie theory's momentum ), cannot use real Coulomb force to form any molecular bonds.

Lowering total energy by lowering Coulomb potential energy (= Coulomb integral ) using the normal Coulomb attractive force between two spreading quantum mechanical electron clouds is impossible, instead, quantum mechanical molecules lacking reality must rely on unphysical exchange energies (= exchange integral ) manipulating pseudo-kinetic energies to form molecular bonds ( this p.3-4, this p.4-5 ).

For the originally-symmetrical hydrogen atomic 1s wave function to be distributed asymmetrically around the nucleus, it needs to create new de Broglie wave's crest and trough not only in the original radial direction but also in tangential direction, which increases the electron's kinetic energy of the hydrogen atom to more than **twice** the original value.

Real molecular bond energy should be generated by negative electrons being attracted to positive nuclei → **lower** Coulomb potential energy → **lower** total energy (= which "lowered" total energy corresponds to molecular bond energy ), which could be canceled by increasing kinetic energy by asymmetrically shrunken and localized wave function when we try to unrealistically generate Coulomb force between quantum mechanical spreading wave functions to form molecular bond.

*(Fig.4) ↓ Just put two hydrogen (= H ) atoms side by side = H2 molecule ?*

A hydrogen molecule (= H2 ) consists of two hydrogen atoms (= H ) containing two negative electrons (= e1 and e2 ) and two positive nuclei (= Ha and Hb ).

Schrödinger equation is expressed as the total energy E equal to the sum of electron's kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy.

Kinetic energy is expressed as the form of derivative of wave function which includes the information about an electron's momentum (= kinetic energy ) as de Broglie wavelength.

In Schrödinger equation for hydrogen molecule (= H2 ), its total energy consists of two electrons' kinetic energy (= denoted by the first two differentiations ), four Coulomb attractive potential energies (= between each negative electron and two positive nuclei ) and Coulomb repulsive energy between two negative electrons.

Quantum mechanical Schrödinger equations are unable to solve any multi-electron atoms and molecules except for the simplest one-electron hydrogen atom ( this p.21 ).

Of course, Schrödinger equation for hydrogen molecule (= H2 ) is also **unsolvable** ( this p.4-lower ).

The useless quantum mechanics has to rely on the ad-hoc pseudo-approximate methods called variational methods, artificially choose some "fake approximate solution with freely-adjustable parameters (= trial function )" and integrate (= Not solve ) those chosen fake wavefunctions with unsolvable H2 molecule Schrödinger equation to get fake average energies, until those fake total energies are seemingly closer to actual energies ( this p.3 ).

↑ These artificially-chosen fake wavefunctions can **never** be true solutions (= conservation of total energy inside a quantum mechanical molecule is impossible ), no matter what forms of trial wavefunctions with any numbers of freely-adjustable parameters are chosen, due to their intrinsically unsolvable Schrödinger equations for multi-electron molecules.

The simplest form of this artificially-chosen fake H2 solution or wavefunction is the product of two hydrogen atomic 1s wave functions.

**Choose** fake H2 solution (= wave function ) → Insert it into Schrödinger equation → Integrate it to get **fake** H2 total energy E ( this p.3-4 ).

↑ These fruitless time-consuming methods just choosing fake approximate solutions or trial wavefunctions with arbitrary free parameters and pseudo-potential energies with No power to predict any atomic or molecular energies are the so-called quantum mechanical ( ab-initio ) calculations ( this p.2-lower, this p.9 ), which are completely useless in all applied science.

Choosing fake solution out of infinite choices freely means quantum mechanics has **No** ability to predict new physical values or atomic energies by *solving* Schrödinger equation (= this solving Schrödinger equation is impossible in all multi-electron atoms and molecules ), so quantum mechanics is **useless**.

*(Fig.5) Kinetic energy is illegitimately "lowered" by quantum cheating. ↓*

As I said, it's impossible for quantum mechanical electron cloud to generate Coulomb attractive force enough to bind two atoms for forming molecular bond.

Then, how does quantum mechanics **lower** total energy to generate (**fake**) molecular bond energy **instead** of lowering Coulomb potential energy based on Coulomb attraction between negative electrons and positive nuclei ?

The sum of electron's kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy is equal to total energy which total energy value must be always constant and conserved due to energy conservation law ( this p.2-upper, this p.2-1st-paragraph ).

Only solvable Schrödinger equation for one-electron hydrogen atom obeys this important energy conservation principle = **constant** total energy.

In any other **unsolvable** Schrödinger equation for **multi**-electron atoms and molecules, this inviolable energy conservation law is **violated**, so quantum mechanics is wrong.

They just choose and guess fake approximate solution for unsolvable Schrödinger equation, and take mean advantage of this violation of energy conservation law to generate **fake** molecular bond energy. ← This is quantum mechanical "cheating".

If orthodox Coulomb forces cannot be used, total energy can**not** be lowered by lowering Coulomb potential energy in forming molecular bonds in a normal way.

Therefore, quantum mechanics has to **un**scientifically lower only electron's kinetic energy based on nonphysical exchange energies (= or exchange integral ) without relying on any real ( Couloumb or exchange ) forces as **fake** molecular bond energy. ← ridiculous !

↑ Seeking the true origin of (unphysical) quantum mechanical molecular covalent bonds have been **avoided** as "paradox" by physicists.

Because quantum mechanics uses **illegitimate** molecular bond energies caused by lowering **fictitious** kinetic energies (by electron's delocalization + **violation** of energy conservation law ) instead of Coulomb electric forces or other real force carriers ( this p.7-last ).

↑ These illegitimately-lowered (or increased ) fictitious kinetic energies are used as the origin of "unphysical exchange energies allegedly causing fake molecular bond or Pauli repulsive energies" which fictitious exchange energies lack real exchange forces because it is generated by manipulating fictitious kinetic energies Not caused by some real forces or physical things ( this p.5, this p.8-last-paragraph ).

Inside each hydrogen atom, the total energy = an electron's kinetic energy + Coulomb energy must be always the **same** *constant* (= conserved ) value E in solvable hydrogen atom. ← This rule keeps valid, if we use hydrogen **atomic** wave function as a **part** of hydrogen **molecular** fake solution ( this p.3 ). ← This is a cheating trick.

For example, in hydrogen **atom**-a (= Ha ), when a negative electron-1 is attracted towards near the positive Ha nucleus, *Coulomb* potential energy becomes **lower**, which is **canceled** out by **higher** electron's *kinetic* energy to keep the conserved **constant** total energy (= electron's position ① of this figure left ).

When the electron-1 moves farther away from the Ha nucleus, its *Coulomb* potential energy becomes **higher**, hence the electron's *kinetic* energy becomes **lower** to **conserve** the constant total energy (= electron's position ② of this figure left ). ← Inside each hydrogen atom (= Not molecule ) with the exact solvable solution, the total energy is conserved and constant.

But in hydrogen ( H2 ) **molecule**, one **more** positive hydrogen *Hb* nucleus is added.

So even when the electron-1 moves farther away from the original Ha nucleus, it is **closer** to another positive *Hb* nucleus, hence, its **Coulomb** potential energy *remains* **low**, and the electron's **kinetic** energy also *remains* **low**, because the hydrogen atomic wave function is used as a part of H2 molecular solution ( this p.1-3 ). ← This is the trick of lowering total energy by lowering kinetic energy by **violating** energy conservation law inside a molecular bond illegitimately.

This clearly shows total energy is Not conserved in hydrogen **molecule** (= this figure right ), hence, quantum mechanics is false.

Because the total energy **changes** (= **Not** conserved ) depending on the electron's position. The total energy changes to higher near Ha nucleus ( due to higher kinetic energy ) and lower near Hb nucleus ( due to lower kinetic energy, while Coulomb potential energy remains lower in both positions, as seen this figure right ).

This **illegitimate** trick is the origin of **fake** molecular bond energy in quantum mechanics = lowering electron *kinetic* energy near the other hydrogen nucleus by **violating** total enenrgy conservation law.

In this trick, the electron's kinetic energy (= represented by hydrogen **atom** wave function ) remains lower, even when the negative electron of one H atom **approaches** the positive nucleus of the **other** H atom in hydrogen molecule.

↑ If the total energy of a H2 molecular ground state is conserved and constant legitimately regardless of any electrons' positions, the electron-1's kinetic energy must be higher also when the electron-1 approaches the other Hb nucleus like the original Ha nucleus. ← This inviolable energy conservation rule is **violated** in any quantum mechanical molecule to generate nonphysical exchange molecular energies based on decreased pseudo-kinetic energies.

The fact that these quantum mechanical **phony** molecular bonds have to rely on the "*cheating*" of **violating** total energy conservation law and Virial theorem (= even when Virial theorem is narrowly satisfied by adjusting parameters of intra-atomic energies in a contracted H atom, it does Not change the fact that the illegetimately lowered **inter**atomic kinetic energies by violating total energy conservation law is the origin of fake quantum mechanical molecular bonds, this p.3 ) means quantum mechanics proves to be a self-contradictory and **wrong** theory.

*(Fig.6) ↓ Each electron exists in both H-atoms a and b at once ?*

Unscientific quantum mechanics repeats a ridiculous claim that even a single particle could exist everywhere in multiple different places simultaneously using fantasy parallel worlds.

Of course, we cannot actually observe such a ghost-like particle or an electron magically splitting into multiple unseen parallel worlds, when we try to detect each electron.

So there is No evidence for such an unscientific quantum mechanical claim. Nobody understands such a contradictory quantum mechanical world.

Suprisingly, irrational quantum mechanics requires this **fictional** condition for generating **fake** molecular bond energy based on nonphysical exchange energies manipulating pseudo-kinetic energies.

In hydrogen *molecule* (= H2 ), quantum mechanics tries to use the **violation** of energy conservation law and **illegitimately**-lowered electron's kinetic energy around the other hydrogen atomic nucleus as fake molecular bond energy.

In hydrogen atom (= H ), the probability density of finding an electron is higher near the nucleus, and the electron probability is **lower** in the area farther **away** from the nucleus.

And the electron's *kinetic* energy is **lower** in the distant area farther **away** from the nucleus due to the total energy conservation law where the total energy = the sum of electron's kinetic energy (= lower in the distant area ) + Coulomb potential energy (= higher in the distant area ) must be always constant and conserved in any electron's positions.

The probability of finding an electron with **lower** *kinetic* energy (= in places **farther** away from the original hydrogen atomic nucleus ) is far **lower** than the probability of an electron with higher kinetic energy near the original hydrogen nucleus. ← Utilizing the lower kinetic energies (= lower probability ) for (fake) molecular bond energies is still difficult only using the original wavefunction.

↑ The probability of an electron in distant places with lower kinetic energy is far smaller than the probability of an electron near the origignal hydrogen nucleus with higher kinetic energy (= large curvature ), so even if they use this fraudulent trick ( this figure right ), it is hard to lower total ( or kinetic ) energy (= illegitimately ) enough to generate fake molecular bond energy due to the **lower** probability.

So the simplest form of (fake) hydrogen molecule solution = just the product of two hydrogen atoms with No exchange interaction cannot get enough molecular bond energy (= lowering kinetic energy is not enough ) due to the extremely lower probability of electrons with lower kinetic energies at places distant from the original nucleus and the ordinary Coulomb potential energy ( or Coulomb integral ) unable to give enough attractive bond energy ( this p.3 upper half, this p.18-20 ).

To **expand** the probability of an electron with **lower** *kinetic* energy at places distant from the original hydrogen nucleus ( in an illegitimate way ), quantum mechanics introduced **unrealistic** concept called "exchange energy".

In order to illegitimately increase the originally-lower probability of an electron-1 with lower kinetic energies distant from the original hydrogen nucleus Ha and near the other hydrogen nucleus Hb (= Coulomb energy is lower despite lower kinetic energy by violating total energy conservation law ), quantum mechanics needs to put another fictitious electron-1's body-double wavefunction also around the other Hb nucleus in addition to the original Ha nucleus.

And this fictitious electron-1's body-double wavefunction at the other Hb nucleus can be used to illegitimately increase the originally-lower probability of the electron-1 around the other Hb nucleus by unphysical exchange integral.

So in order to use this nonphysical exchange energy, the quantum mechanics outrageously insists each single electron must always exist in more than one **different** places = around both hydrogen atom-a (= Ha ) and hydrogen atom-b (= Hb ) **simultaneously** using fictional parallel universes ( this p.7-lower, this p.2 ).

As a result, this unrealistic new H2 molecule fake trial wavefunction must consist of hydrogen atom-a wave functions containing **both** electron-1 and electron-2 (= φ_{Ha}(e1) and φ_{Ha}(e2) ), and hydrogen atom-b wave functions containing both electron-1 and electron-2 (= φ_{Hb}(e1) and φ_{Hb}(e2) ) at the same time ( this p.3-(8), this p.15 ).

In this quantum mechanical outrageous world, even a **single** inseparable electron must exist in *multiple* **different** places, orbitals or atoms apart from each other *simultaneously* using nonphysical exchange energies and Pauli antisymmetric wavefunction which cannot be explained by any real objects in our world, so quantum mechanics is obviously a **fictional** theory ( this p.11, this p.11 ).

*(Fig.7) exchanged symmetric wave function → unreal exchange energy*

In order to get fake molecular bond energy, quantum mechanics makes an unrealistic claim that each single electron always exists in two different atoms simultaneously in any molecular bonds.

This unrealistic wave function is called a (anti-)symmetric wave function which includes terms exchanging multiple electrons.

Choosing unphysical exchanged H2 molecule wave function (= each single electron exists in different atoms = both hydrogen-a and hydrogen-b wave functions simultaneously ) and integrating Schrödinger equation give two types of integrals or energies ( this p.14, this lower ).

One integral of them represents ordinary Coulomb energy which consists of normal electron's charge probability forms denoted by the product of two same hydrogen atomic wave functions ( this middle ).

For example, the product of two same φ_{Ha}(e1) and φ_{Ha}(e1) wave functions represents electron-1 (= e1) **charge** probability density φ_{Ha}φ_{Ha}, which contributes to Coulomb energy (= Coulomb integral ) which effect is too small to form molecular bond.

So in quantum mechanical fictional molecules, ordinary **Coulomb** force (= Not contributing to quantum mechanical fake molecular bond energies ) or Coulomb energy (= Coulomb integral ) is too **small** to generate molecular bond energy, and it has to rely on unphysical exchange energies (= or exchange integral ) as (fictitious) main molecular bond energies ( this p.3-4, this p.11, this p.8-9, this p.4-5, this p.4-5-Figure.1 ).

Unlike real Coulomb energy, the unrealistic exchange energy ( or exchange integral, this lower ) uses
the product of two **different** φ_{Hb}(e1) and φ_{Ha}(e1) wave functions, which is Not a normal electron's *probability* density form.

The normal electron's charge density or probability is expressed as φ_{Ha}(e1)φ_{Ha}(e1) or φ_{Hb}(e1)φ_{Hb}(e1), while the unphysical exchange interaction is expressed as φ_{Ha}(e1)φ_{Hb}(e1).

This artificially-introduced, unphysical exchange energy ( or integral ) can**not** be described by any *real* objects on the earth, hence, the exchange energy lacks physical meaning ( this p.11 ) and is **unreal**.

*(Fig.8) ↓ Probability of electron with low kinetic energy is increased ?*

How does unphysical exchange energy increase the **probability** (= area ) of an electron with **low** *kinetic* energy at places distant from the original hydrogen nucleus in order to generate fake molecular bond energy ?

As I said, quantum mechanics, which cannot utilize normal Coulomb force (= Coulomb integral ), generates fake molecular bond energy by using nonphyseical exchange energies lowering kinetic energy illegitimately = **violating** total energy connservation law, so quantum mechanics is **false**.

But as an electron-1 moves farther away from Ha nucleus toward the other Hb nucleus, its *kinetic* energy is **lower** (= to cancel higher Coulomb potential energy for conserving the constant total energy inside only the original Ha-hydrogen atom ) and, at the same time the probability of finding such an electron with lower kinetic energy also **decreases** at places distant from the original Ha nucleus, which cannot lower kinetic energy enough to generate fake molecular bond energy.

So physicists invented this unphysical "exchange energy (= including the electron-1's body-double wavefunction also around the other Hb nucleus = the high-probability even at places distant from the original Ha nucleus and near the other Hb nucleus ) or exchange integral", which can **expand** the low probability area of an electron having **lower** *kinetic* energy (= at places distant from the original Ha nucleus and near the other Hb nucleus ).

These unphysical exchange energies **further** *decrease* the electron's **kinetic** energy in an illegitimate way by expanding the low-probability low-kinetic energy area of the electron-1 around the other Hb nucleus. → further decrease total energy → fake molecular bond energy in quantum mechanical molecule.

↑ Therefore, quantum mechanical molecule based on contradictory "exchange energy" violating energy conservation law is just unphysical and **unreal**.

This unrealistic "exchange energy" whose effect is irrationally far **bigger** than ordinary Coulomb energy (= this means real Coulomb force is negligible, Not used in quantum mechanical molecule ) is the main contributor to **pseudo**-molecular bond energy forming between quantum mechanical electron clouds ( unphysical exchange energy is far more influential than Coulomb energy, see this p.3-4, this p.3-4 Figure.1, this p.3, this p.8-9, this p.11 ).

When changing the sign between two exchanged wave functions' terms from plus (= called symmetric ) to minus (= called antisymmetric ), the unphysical "exchange integral" caused by anti-symmetric wave functions is supposed to express Pauli exclusion principle energy.

Due to the flipped sign of unphysical antisymmetric wavefunctions allegedly expressing Pauli principle, this quantum mechanical Pauli repulsive energy (= the opposite of the fake molecular attractive energy lowering kinetic energies ) is said to be caused by increasing pseudo-kinetic energies for anti-bonding without real repulsive forces ( this p.9-10 ).

As I said, this "exchange integral or energy" is **unrealistic**, so Pauli exclusion principle can Not be treated as a **real** repulsive force due to **lack** of real physical meaning ( this p.6, this p.6-4th-paragarph ) and force carrier of Pauli repulsive force, so unphysical exchange energies are completely useless in any applied science.

*(Fig.9) Exchange → indistinguishable electrons → one pseudo-electron*

To generate **fake** molecular bonds, each single electron has to exist in all different places or atoms *simultaneously* using parallel worlds, as if all electrons are unrealistically **identical** and indistinguishable, inside any quantum mechanical material.

These unrealistic indistinguishable electrons are expressed as unphysical forms called (anti-)symmetric wave functions which consist of even-numbered wave function terms exchanging any two electrons ( this p.3-4 )".

If all different electrons can be treated like identical and indistinguishable electrons absurdly, it means it's OK even if we pick up **one** of those *indistinguishable* electrons and treat the whole material consisting of many electrons as "**one** *pseudo*-electron" called "quasi-particle ( this p.2, this p.2 upper ) with fake effective mass".

This unrealistic one-quasi-electron approximate model of solid is called "band model" which contains pseudo-electron with fake (= effective ) mass, which can be even negative, and quasi-pseudo-momentum.

To develop this pseudo-band theory, quantum mechanics has to illogically increase the number of **fictitious** quasi-particles with fake mass and charge for explaining physical phenomena in material.

For quantum mechanics to unrealistically describe and calculate many-electron material as one pseudo-electron model, physicists invented an **impractical** theory called density functional theory (= DFT or Kohn-Sham, this p.3 ).

This one-pseudo-electron DFT model with **fake** (= effective ) potential always fails in explaining actual many-electron phenomena ( this p.17 ), so useless and **prevents** us from using atomic theory in applied science such as medicine.

In spite of this useless and meaningless DFT theory based on one-pseudo-electron model, surprisingly, almost all today's quantum mechanical researches on materials use this ad-hoc DFT as the only calculation tool in vain ( this p.6 ).

*(Fig.10) ↓ Unrealistic quantum mechanics → extra-dimensions !?*

As I explained here, today's condensed matter is **fiction** filled with *pseudo*-electrons with **fake** changeable negative mass, fractional-charge quasiparticles, imaginary magnetic monopole, sonic black hole ...

All these fictional concepts come from the current unrealistic atomic theory = quantum mechanics which still Nobody understands, strangely, even 100 years after quantum mechanics was introduced.

Today's fantasy condensed matter physics prevents scientists from applying useless quantum mechanical atomic theory to other practical fields such as nano-technology, medicine and drug development. → Curing deadly diseases is impossible forever.

So this fictional quantum mechanics forced physicists to create many new **fictional** concepts one after another, as new fictional scientific targets to continue to get "research" funds, academic positions and prestigious prizes.

As *imaginary* far-distant scientific targets in universe, they made up **fictional** Big Bang, wormhole, multiverse, black hole ( we proved black hole itself is a self-contradictory object, hence black hole does Not exist ), and meaningless paradox physicists pursue endlessly.

As **ghost**-like, unseen, untoucheable meaningless scientific targets, physicists proposed unreal virtual photons, dark photon, undetectable dark matter, dark energy and gravitational wave which is too weak to be useful except for getting prestigious Nobel prize.

After **wasting** huge taxpayers' money in gigantic colliders and just looking at meaningless garbage data collected from countless colliding atoms, particle physicists insist they might find God particle and unseen fractional-charge quarks in vain.

All these **imaginary** elementary particles allegedly popping up only in virtual circumstances inside colliders or particle physicists' heads are completely **useless** except for selling "sci-fi" books, because these doubtful particles are unable to utilize or take out from colliders for practical use forever, and they are too short-lived to believe as real particles.

As fantasy "theory of everything" uniting Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics, physicists started to believe in unseen imaginary extra-dimensions, which is **Not** "science" at all.

As long as physicists **refuse** to clarify real meaning of mysterious quantum mechanical fiction and contradictory wave-particle duality, we can **never** break away from these science fiction which dominates the current academia and physics world for moving forward to true really-useful "science".

*(Fig.11) "Science" stops progressing → useless education, boring jobs with No future ? → unrealistic Green-new-deal really creates jobs ? *

It's still unclear what US presidential result will become with counting mail-in ballots or something.

If Trump loses the election despite Democratic party's radical push for "unrealistic" climate "science" or Green-new-deal, what's the reason for that ?

Trump repeatedly pushed for "job" and "education", and encouraged more people to go to school, universities during corona pandemic and get good jobs. ← But did this message really succeed in attracting people's sympathy ?

What is the definition of "good jobs" ? Of course, higher-income jobs are better ones. But it's impossible for all people to get high-income jobs.

And even in high-income earners, there are many people who think their jobs are **boring** and unsatisfying, so want to quit.

A more important factor determining "good jobs" is whether workers **feel** jobs are **satisfying** and exciting. If people really think they **want** to continue their work, this is really a "**good** job".

Those "good" jobs which people find "exciting" should have **future** and dream, keep **progressing**.

What happens if the current basic "science" **refuses** to *progress*, miserably stuck in **fictional** concepts such as parallel worlds and extra-dimensions ?

If today's **basic** atomic theory makes **No** progress, **all** other applied "science", innovation and our economy also **stop** progressing.

If everyday's work remains **unchanged**, *refuses* to progress, forever, people naturally feel it is **boring** and monotonous, there will be No future even if they continue their work.

Soon they will get sick and tired of boring monotonous jobs with No dream or future, when they find their "jobs" will make No more progress due to **stopping** *basic* "science".

The work which Trump passionately tries to get back to US is an **old** kind of jobs which have been already outsourced to foreign countries or immigrants.

Even if students go to **expensive** universities and
graduate saddled with a lot of student loan, all they can get is **boring**, monotonous jobs which do Not even need expensive college degree, if college education is **useless**.

So students just **spoil** their precious young life in meaningless school education and unversities, shouldering a lot of debt only for getting expensive degrees, finding satisfying jobs is difficult, because they find the knowledge they acquired in universities is useless, which today's miserable situation originates from **fantasy** basic science which prevents all the applied science, medicine and innovation from advancing.

If the medical technology has made No more progress due to fictional basic science, it's extremely difficult to reduce costs for medical treatments and drugs.

By the way, today's school "*science*" is really "science" or just "**pretending**" to be science ?

"Scientists" should take an **objective** and *impartial* view of what's going on around them. Because "scientific facts" are originally **neutral** universal things for everyone, which should Not be **distorted** by a cheap political view.

But for example, about the recent maninstream media and Big tech's censorship of Biden's scandal, almost all "scientists" **shut** their mouth tightly and **unnaturally** stay **silent**, as if some "academic" authority placed a **gag** on their free speech.

Actually, their so-called "science" is filled with **fictional** concepts such as parallel worlds, imaginary extra-dimensions which are completely **useless** for our daily life, except for a mere political tool.

**Fair**, objective and **unbiased** judgement, which is essential for scientists to look at things, completely **disappeared** from the current politically-partial academia.

If their so-called "science" really means the science based on natural **common** facts and phenomena, this science should be originally **impartial** and common to all people, whether they are republicans, democrats or independents.

Deep-rooted problem inherent in today's society is still **unsolved**.

We should take a look at today's so-called "science" and recheck the validity and **reality** of the current basic physics which unscientific concepts might undermine all our society, as soon as possible.

Otherwise, no matter how passionately politicians encourage people to get more "jobs", "education" and give away more taxpayers' money to fictional "science" research, if those "*pseudo*-science" makes **No** more progress, the deep-rooted problem tormenting people by "boring, unsatisfying jobs with no future or progress" will **never** be solved.

The same thing can be said about politicians **unrealistically** claiming Green new deal will create many "science **jobs**" even if they ban the use of fossil fuel.

The fact is no matter how much taxpayers' money is **wasted** for their so-called "science", the technology of solar panel and wind energy remains useless with No more progress or innovation, because the current basic science for solar panels also stops progressing forever, as I said.

So we should stop **fantasizing** about the current fantasy science and restore a realistic, impartial and "truly-scientific" view of what's actually happening in the current world and basic science.

2020/11/6 updated. Feel free to link to this site.