Fantasy quantum physics.

Top
Summary

Quantum physics still uses fictional particles.

[ "Future quantum technology ?" means "No progress". ]

(Fig.1)  ↓ Fake "future" target = quantum ?  ;  

Introduction

Quantum mechanics invented 100 years ago is unrealistic and useless, relying on fictitious quasiparticles to explain all physical phenomena.

Quasiparticle is unreal, having fake (= effective ) mass and charge, which are freely-adjustable to deal with different phenomena, so meaningless in predicting new reactions.

For useless quantum physics to get research funds, physicists needed to create fake target = fictional quantum computer which is supposed to exploit fantasy parallel worlds for faster (← ? ) parallel computing ?  ← still  Not reality.

To hide the inconvenient fact that the current quantum physics is useless with No progress, academia spreads fake news to deceive people into falsely believing their researches are worth taxpayers' money.

If you carefully read each quantum technology news, you will notice they make No progress, just using misleading phrases to get your hopes up.

 

This week physics  (6/26)    ← still No progress.

This week solid-physics is still full of unreal quasi-particles such as phonon ( this, this, this ), exciton ( this, this, this ), trion ( this ), plasmon ( this ).

Other unreal quasiparticles are skyrmion ( this, this ), magnon ( this, this ), Weyl fermion.

The 1st paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Skyrmions (= unreal quasiparticle ) could revolutionise computing exhibiting great potential in the electronic storage of information ?"  ← Just speculation, still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "in solids including Rydberg excitons (= unreal quasiparticle ), skyrmions and phonons, .. elementary excitations in solid-state systems will be foundational to generate novel solid-state devices ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Advanced Imaging of Matter, sees vast potential in the use of light to control materials ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.  Unreal phonon quasiparticle is used ( this abstract latter )

The 2nd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "what in practice means the possibility of preparing various type of lattices ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.  Unreal Bogoliubov quasiparticle is used ( this p.4 middle )

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "If achieved, this would create new opportunities to understand and fine-tune the properties of real semiconductors in future research ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.  Unreal quasiparticle exciton is used.

The 2nd last paragraph of this news just says "Though phonons (= unreal quasiparticle ) have a lot of disadvantages over photons ?", and its 1st paragraph just vaguely says "Quantum communication—has the potential to become the ultimate secure communication ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The 5th last paragraph of this news just says "conventional electron-phonon (= unreal quasiparticle ) mechanisms", and its 2nd last paragraph just vaguely says "In the future, other research teams could draw inspiration from their work ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "it looks like it will be also a promising way to describe superconducting materials ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.  Unreal Bogoliubov quasiparticle is used

The 1st paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Quantum computing promises to improve our ability to perform some critical computational tasks in the future ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.

The 1st paragraph of this news just vaguely says "For quantum computers working with light, it is equally necessary to have at least 50 photons. .. or else they will worsen their own quantum capabilities. It is this perfection that makes it hard to realize"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.

The 2nd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Because they are still in their infancy, quantum computers are difficult to compare—thus, it is difficult to tell which of two machines is more powerful"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.

The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says " This indicates a potential application of the DPT to quantum metrology ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The 1st paragraph of this news just vaguely says "A 50-year-old theory that began as speculation about how an alien civilization could use a black hole to generate energy ?"  ← Just fantasy physics, useless forever.

The 2nd & 3rd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Our result has implications for the security of quantum-based encryption .. Unfortunately for students preparing for exams, quantum hints won't be available outside the lab anytime soon"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The researchers did, however, observe artifacts—elements that do not correspond to the structure of the sample—in the OCT images they acquired ?"  ← still impractical.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "this method is not limited by harsh environmental conditions (such as vacuum or low temperature), which is very competitive in biological applications ?"  ← Nothing useful is specified in detail.  Unreal spin is just nonphysical math symbol (= S ) with No physical figure ( this p.1 right lower ).

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "This experiment would have a great potential to find out if the neutrino is its own antiparticle, which could lead to answer fundamental questions about the origin of the universe ?"  ← Just speculation about imaginary physics, still useless research.

The 1st paragraph of this news just vaguely says "This rare Standard Model process is expected to occur only once for every 70 thousand pairs of top quarks created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and has proven extremely difficult to measure ?"  ← Unseen fictional elementary particle research is meaningless, a waste of money.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "This will ensure that the anticipated statistical improvements in the measurements of γ at the LHCb and Belle II experiments over the next decade will have a deep impact on precision tests of the standard model"  ← This standard model (= particle physics ) itself is fiction, so meaningless research.

The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "considered whether the pairs of interacting photons produce axion-like particles (a) as they scatter off each other (γγ → a → γγ), which would lead to an excess of scattering events with diphoton ?"  ← Trying to create fictional particle (= axion ? ) from garbage irrelevant data (= photon, light ) inside collider is meaningless.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "confident it will soon find out whether this excess is a mere statistical fluke, a background contaminant, or something far more exciting: a new particle .. ?"  ← "Exciting" is emotional, Not a scientific word, so physically meaningless research.

 

to

2020/6/26 updated. Feel free to link to this site.