Corrupt university, journal, fake news

Top
Next

"Quantum internet" is illusion.

[ Quantum "science" is Not futuristic technology. ]

(I-1)  ↓ Fairy-tale parallel worlds =   ?

COVID-19 pandemic hit the economy by strict social distancing, increasing unemployment, wealth gap and protests across the world.

The only way to prevent economic collapse and save people is to develop futuristic "science" and find an effective cure for deadly coronaviruses as soon as possible.

But the current "science" authorized by academia turned out to be completely useless and helpless before deadly viruses.

Those science is Not worth learning.  "Scientists" are pursuing only "science fiction" such as parallel universes and unseen extra-dimensions in vain.

Now schools or universities are No longer safe places, they become hotspots of viruses, continuing outdated teaching practice for their impractical science, risking both students' and parents' lives, just to protect their academic status.

Recently, Elon's SpaceX succeeded in launching a rocket and fullfilled their duty to send astronauts safely.  But calling this rocket "historic" sounds weird.

They already successfully landed on the moon half a century ago, and there was already a manned spacecraft called Space Shuttle.

It means humans' technology about space exploration has Not progressed for a long time.  ← So all other "science" stalls, too.

Quantum "technology" such as "quantum internet" and information is often referred to as the most promising "futuristic" technology.

But contrary to those media hype, the definition of "quantum internet or technology" is very vague and broad.  Still Nobody understands quantum mechanics which theory allegedly underlies quantum internet.

In fact, quantum internet is Not futuristic technology at all, it's just pseudo-science obsessed with 100-year-old ancient, unrealistic hypothesis.

Schrödinger wave function of quantum mechanics, which is the only theory to describe atoms and electrons, cannot offer No information about the position and velocity of each electron, and even whether an electron is a particle or wave is unanswered due to the ridiculous rule called uncertainty principle.

So every object around us is a "shapeless phantom", and its motion is uncertain and unpredictable according to quantum mechanics.  How can we apply this unsubstantial, suspicious atomic theory to actual technology ?  ← Impossible.

If every physical concept is uncertain and undefinable, physicists can do nothing.  They need some "definite" tools.  The only certain confirmed phenomena which are available even in uncertain quantum mechanics is the atomic energy levels.

By absorbing or emitting light waves in each atom, the atomic electron's energy levels alternate between ground and excited states.

The concept of these "energy states or levels" can be explained also by ordinary classical mechanics.  How do they make these energy states peculiar to phantom-like quantum mechanics ?

Surprisingly, quantum mechanics insists each object has "supernatural" ability to exist in two different places at the same time using unseen, unphysical parallel worlds.

Quantum mechanical object is like an unreal cat which can be in two different contradictory states = dead and alive at the same time, which paranormal phenomenon is called "superposition".

If these surreal parallel worlds are actually observable, quantum mechanical fantasy worlds prove to be real.  But it's impossible to peek into these parallel worlds, hence, there is No evidence of quantum mechanics and its parallel worlds.

In this real world, an unbreakable, tangible object can exist in only one place, and a cat can be in only one of two states, dead or alive at once, unless it is "ghost".

Despite No evidence of quantum mechanical parallel worlds, the current physics keeps insisting each electron can be in two different places or energy levels (= ground and excited states ) simultaneously with the help of delusional parallel worlds.

So-called quantum technology and quantum internet try to use these "fantasy parallel worlds" emanating from old outdated theory 100 years ago, as if they were the state-of-the-art "futuristic technology" !  ← unbelievable.

Heisenberg uncertainty principle notoriously forbids us to decide whether each object (= electron, light ) is a particle or a wave.  ← We are Not allowed to even ask or pursue deeper true mechanism.  No more freedom of science or speech.

Quantum mechanics uses this old artificial "uncertainty" rule as an excuse to treat "clearly classical electromagnetic wave" as a "fictitious light particle" called photon.

A particle should be like a rigid, unbreakable rock, and a wave is just a vibration of fluid medium.  So a particle and wave should have completely different physical shape and property.

But quantum mechanics unreasonably forces an unrealistic, contradictory idea that light or an electron can be a particle and wave at once (← impossible ! ) without further logical explanation.

Quantum technology or quantum internet tries to deliberately misinterpret "classical light wave" as a fictitious particle = photon".

There is No evidence for a light particle = photon.

The only evidence of a photon is said to be the photoelectric effect where physicists just detect electrons (= Not a photon itself ) ejected by light wave and call them "fictional photons" with No more detailed explanation of how exactly a photon interacts with an electron.

The name of "a single photon detector" is misleading, because it detects only electrons (= Not a photon particle ) kicked out by incident light due to photoelectric effect.

A light has experimentally-confirmed wavelength and polarization which are clearly "wave nature", Not a particle nature, and can cause interference and split into different polarized light.  ← An unbreakable photon particle cannot explain these phenomena, Only waves can explain them, like sound wave.

No experiments showed evidence of what shape and size a ghostly photon is.

Actually, all pictures depict a photon as "light vibrating wave" instead of a round rigid particle.  Then, why does quantum mechanics want to describe light as an imaginary photon particle ?

Because a photon fits the concept of fictional "parallel worlds" designated by quantum mechanics.
Imagine classical waves mixing multiple light waves with various different polarizations and wavelengths.

Quantum mechanics stubbornly tries to treat this "classically mixed light waves" as "a single fictitious photon" with different states or polarizations coexisting using different parallel worlds, which they call superposition = a dead and alive cat state.

Actually, when just "weak classical light" splits at double slits in a realistic way, and causes interference (= natural, realistic phenomena ), they intentionally misinterpret it as a single fictional photon splitting into different parallel worlds (= because a single photon is unbreakable ) at double slits to cause interference.

Just because quantum mechanics craves this fictional photon particle, doesn't mean the proof of fantasy, unobservable parallel worlds.  But for uncertain and chaotic quantum mechanics, illusory parallel worlds are its only characteristic tool distinguished from ordinary classical mechanics to develop its own unique theory.

So whether they are real or not, these "parallel worlds" are essential concepts for quantum mechanical theory and research papers,

Another spooky phenomenon peculiar to quantum mechanics is faster-than-light "entanglement".

This quantum "entanglement" is just an unnecessary, meaningless concept like parallel worlds, because it cannot send any information or communicate.  ← "Entanglement" or teleportation has No physical influence on other things, so useless concepts.

When we get classical light through some special crystal, it splits into two polarized lights = one light is vertically polarized and another light is horizontally polarized.

When we measure one of the lights and know it has vertically polarization, this measurement instantly (= faster-than-light ? ) determines another light has "horizontal" polarization.  ← It's natural, Not spooky or faster-than-light action at all.

They just treat this act of "measurement" of light polarization which can be artificially adjusted in advance ( ex. we can make polarizations of two lights perpendicular or parallel to each other ) as "spooky entanglement" which has nothing do with faster-than-light spooky action claimed by quantum mechanics.

So if we prepare two light waves with the same (= parallel ) polarization, when one light (= photon ) is measured to be "vertically polarized", its measurements instantly determines another light as "vertically polarized", too.  ← Quite natural, No faster-than-light spooky entanglement here.

Then why do physicists desperately try to associate this commonplace classical polarized light with illusory faster-than-light spooky entanglement of photons ?

When we do Not know whether each light has vertical or horizontal polarization, quantum mechanics call this "unknown state" "(illusory) superpositon" where they insist the light exists as two different fictitious photons with horizontal and vertical polarizations simultaneously using unseen quantum parallel worlds.

Whether light wave is horizontally or vertically polarized is unknown = classical mechanical interpretation
→ The light is a single (fictitious) photon particle which has two different polarizations (= horizontal and vertical ) at once using two different parallel worlds = quantum mechanical interpretation.

So if they suppose these fictional parallel worlds, they also need another fictional concept of "entanglement" connecting different parallel worlds where two light polarizations have some special relationship.

When they prepare a pair of photons (= light ) with polarizations perpendicular to each other, each photon can be horizontally polarized in one parallel world, and vertically polarized in another parallel world, simultaneously.

And when one photon is horizontally ( or vertically ) polarized, another photon is vertically ( or horizontally ) polarized.  ← these two photons' polarizations perpendicular to each other is treated as "entanglement" relationship in unrealistic quantum mechanical world.

We cannot see parallel worlds (= superposition ) or send faster-than-light information by this illusory entanglement (= Hence, "speed-up" does Not happen in quantum internet ).  Then, what is this quantum technology or internet useful for ?

Physicists needed to find another reason or fictitious purpose for this useless quantum internet, so they started to say quantum internet could be "unhackable (← ? )" instead of speed-up.  How do quantum parallel worlds and spooky entanglement lead to "unhackable" internet ?

They try to use light ( or photon ) polarization as a bit (= ex. horizontally polarized light = 0,  vertically polarized light = 1 ) and send some information combining these two types of light polarizations = horizontal or vertical as data.

A photon is very, very weak, faint light.  So some eavesdropper tries to measure the weak light polarization to steal information, this measurement surely changes or destroys the state of very fragile weak light which is so sensitive to disturbances (= measurement ).

As a result, by detecting broken weak light, the attempt to "eavesdrop" is easily detected ( this p.4 ).  ← unhackable quantum internet ?  Unfortunately, this process is perfectly explained by ordinary classical mechanics, fantasy quantum mechanics is Not necessary at all.

Send very weak light as a fictitious photon with its polarization used as "information" → Some eavesdropper intercepts the light and measures its polarization.

→ This eavesdropper's measurement is "invasive" and influential enough to "destroy" the target = very weak fragile light → This "destroyed" light tells receiver the light polarization information is measured and stolen by some eavesdropper  ← Quantum internet is unhackable ?  ← Nonsense.

It is quite natural that very weak light state is easily destroyed by any disturbances such as measurement by eavesdropper, whether the light is classical or quantum.  So this has nothing to do with quantum mechanical property.

And sending very weak light (= photon ? ) to very distant places is extremely difficult and impractical.  So quantum internet using very weak light as a fictitious photon is just an useless technology based on ungrounded fictional theory.

In fact, each electron cannot emit real photon conserving total energy and momentum.  An electron can absorb or emit only "unreal virtual photon" with imaginary mass ( this p.3 ).  ← So in order to rely on only real objects to explain this physical phenomenon, light must be wave, Not a photon particle (= which is always an unreal virtual photon according to quantum mechanics ).

In order to avoid contradictory (virtual) photon, we have to accept real light "medium" which Einstein once rejected.  Electromagnetic wave should be emitted from "friction" between the medium and an electron losing energy instead of an unreal virtual photon emitted by an electron surrounded by the vaccum containing nothing.

Recently, you may often hear many cool and futuristic-sounding phrases such as "quantum AI" or "quantum machine learning".

But quantum computer which also tries to use fictional parallel worlds like quantum internet for its parallel computing is still useless and Not faster at all.  All the latest Google quantum computer can do is generate "meaningless random numbers".  ← No sophisticated or futuristic computation can be done in the current suspicious quantum computer, which is Not even a calculator.

So practical use of illusory quantum computer for so-called quantum simulation or life-saving medication, which "futuristic-sounding phrases" are abused by the media, is impossible, they are just misleading catchphrases for getting attention and research money for their fake quantum mechanical science.

First of all, no matter how fast the current computer becomes (= though, it's impossible, while Moore's law is ending ), as long as unrealistic, obsolete quantum mechanics is used as an atomic model, we can never explain or compute actual molecular or biological reactions in an useful way, hence curing deadly diseases will never happen.

The current quantum mechanical model obstinately refuses to clarify deeper atomic and electron behavior, which unrealistic atomic theory and its "unscientific" attitude obviously prevent us from advancing new technology forever.

Schrödinger equation, which is the only calculation tool of quantum mechanics, is unsolvable and useless in all multi-electron atoms, molecules and solids.  They just choose fake solution and fake energies (= hence, scientifically meaningless ), which calculation method is a kind of "art" rather than "science".

So quantum mechanics can only express many-electron solids as very abstract, nonphysical "bands" which just consist of a fictitious particles (= with No definite position or physical shape ) with fake (= effective ) mass, which can be even unrealistically negative mass.

And in order to describe various physical phenomena, quantum mechanics has to rely on "unreal quasiparticle model" with fake charge, which imaginary particle model got even Nobel prize ( this p.7 ) and hampers the development of the current science.

The most widely used approximate tool of Schrödinger equation to calculate many-electron solids or molecules is the density functional theory (= DFT ) which treats the whole solid as "one fictitious pseudo-electron" with non-interacting pseudo-potential ( this p.3 ) which very rough, nonphysical and unreasonable approximation always fails ( this p.17 ) miserably.

So all atomic models and calculation tools of quantum mechanics are useless and meaningless, hence, so-called "quantum simulaton" and quantum machine learning based on these useless theories are meaningless, too.

Humans already have excellent technology to observe and manipulate each single atom.  So a deadly virus is No longer "invisible" enemy, therefore, curing those deadly diseases is Not a pipe dream any longer, if we replace the current useless fictional quantum mechanics by other practical, realistic atomic models which can use real objects as calculation tools, and clearly determine whether each electron or light is a particle or wave.

So the first thing we should do now is discard useless obsolete quantum mechanics which obstinately avoids detailed explanation of underlying atomic behavior using uncertainty principle as an excuse, which never considers electrons or light as real objects with tangible physical figure.

Quantum mechanics always has to use fictitous quasiparticle and virtual particle model to explain physical phenomena.  ← Replacing the current unreal quasiparticle model of quantum mechanics by real particles such as electrons and light is the first thing to do for developing practical science.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Quantum computer is an impossible dream.

[ Useless science fantasizes "illusory computer". ]

(Q-1)  ↓ Parallel-world quantum mechanics →   ?

"Freedom" is one of the most important human rights.
Instead, each person bears responsibility for his or her own action to avoid contracting viruses.

But school education is "mandatory" in all countries.

So, even if many parents want their children to stay safe and avoid deadly coronaviruses, they have to send students back to schools sooner or later, while schools could be new "virus hotspots".

Therefore, schools must be safe and perfectly protect students from deadly viruses.  Or schools must teach "useful science" which overshadows the risk of getting dangerous viruses.

All the present "science" is built on the old atomic theory called quantum mechanics, which basic principle has Not changed for the past 100 years.

Surprisingly, still Nobody understands the real meaning of quantum mechanics despite a huge amount of time and money spent in its research.

Quantum mechanics is notorious for avoiding detailed description of what "actually" happens inside atoms.  ← Everything is uncertain and nebulous according to quantum mechanics.

Modern sophisticated computers and all biological reactions in living organisms are "controlled" orderly and systematically, obeying some common physical principle.

But quantum mechanics is exactly the opposite of "order" or definite physical rules.  Its unpredictable nature is highly disorderly and uncertain.

Such a disorderly and chaotic quantum mechanics can really construct very orderly and sophisticated computers or biological nano-machines ?  ← Impossible.

Therefore, the current very orderly-controlled computer CPU has nothing to do with "uncertain" and unpredictable quantum mechanics, and so-called " quantum computer" based on this chaotic quantum mechanics can never be a methodical or useful tool for us.

Physicists have been plagued by "uncertainty principle" of baffling quantum mechanics whose unpredictable nature forbids them to design elaborate atomic behavior since its first introduction in 1920s.

Quantum mechanics can treat each particle only as "unphysical, intangible Schrödinger wavefunction" whose mathematical description is completely silent about whether each electron is a particle or a wave.

This ambiguous wavefunction cannot tell us about the precise position and velocity of each particle, let alone the concrete physical shape of a particle or wave, due to Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

So according to quantum mechanics, each particle can be "everywhere" in multiple different places or states at the same time like a ghost, which occult phenomenon is often called "superposition".

This "superposition" idea was ridiculed even by the founder of quantum mechanics = Schrödinger who liked to associate inexplicable quantum world with a fairy-tale cat which can be dead an alive at the same time living in fantasy quantum parallel universes.

Imagine a cat in a box with a 50-50 chance of being killed by poison.

According to the standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, this cat can be in two different states = dead and alive simultaneously until someone opens the box and observes the cat.  ← The "observer's eyes" have some "supernatural" power to decide the observed cat state ?

When the observer opens the box, the cat in sight "instantaneously" chooses the state of dead or alive = "Instantaneously" means the cat state is determined (= dead or alive ) even at far faster-than-light speed.

Einstein harshly criticized this unscientific and contradictory quantum mechanics, which allows even faster-than-light spooky action, grumbling "God does not play dice".

In 1950s, a Princeton physicist, Hugh Everett proposed a bold new idea called many-worlds interpretation where each particle is supposed to be in different states or places at once using different invisible parallel worlds.

In this many-world interpretation, an observer without supernatural power just peeks at one of the different particle's states or parallel worlds (= other parallel worlds still remain invisible ) which bold idea is supposed to solve the problem plaguing Copenhagen interpretation.

But this many-worlds quantum theory is very counter-intuitive and unacceptable.  Each ghost-like cat can be dead and alive simultaneously roaming around two different worlds ?  ← How can these multiple different worlds coexist in the same location without hitting each other ?  ← Impossible !

Surprisingly, in the current physical society, this weirdest parallel-world theory is accepted as the best and only reasonable interpretation of quantum mechanics !

In quantum mechanics, any important physical properties such as the position, velocity and shape of each particle are uncertain, unpredictable and unclear, and its chaotic nature is impossibe to apply in practical computers which requires strict, orderly and methodical control.

But physicists constantly need some "reason" for continuing their fruitless research and getting funds.
So they made up some "fictitious target" which even tries to exploit the only "certain" property of unpredictable quantum mechanics = parallel worlds.

This "fictitious target" is notorious "quantum computer", which was first proposed by Oxford physicist, David Deutsch in 1985, who was known to be an ardent supporter of fantasy many-worlds interpretation.

They argue quantum computer could perform multiple different calculations simultaneously using parallel worlds and a single common instrument.

A computer is made up of "bits".  Each bit can be in only one of two states 0 or 1.  Each bit cannot be 0 and 1 at the same time in ordinary computer.

In quantum computer, each bit (= called "qubit" ) is said to be in two different states 0 and 1 simultaneously (= called superposition ) using parallel worlds.

Of course, we cannot see these ghost-like parallel worlds (= you have never seen a grotesque dead and alive cat ).  Quantum mechanics says we can just observe one of multiple states or worlds (= 0 or 1,  a cat is dead or alive ), when we actually try to look at it.

Aside from illusory parallel worlds, basically, any objects with two different ( energy ) states can be used as this quantum bit.  For examle, light (= photon ) polarization (= vertical =0, horizontal = 1 ), atomic energy levels (= ground state = 0, excited state = 1 ), ions or superconducting artificial atoms..

But most of these materials are fragile and unstable which is one of reasons all attempts to realize quantum computers have failed miserably so far, and its future is completely uncertain.

In 1994, MIT Peter Shor came up with new "algorithm" of factorization allegedly using these ghost-like "parallel-worlds power" of quantum computer.

But these quantum computers still cannot outperform ordinary classical computers.  Actually Nobody uses this doubtful quantum computer in our daily life.

One of main reasons for the failure of quantum mechanics is it cannot use or prove the ghostly power of unseen and insubstantial "parallel worlds".

Up to now, all calculations such as Shor's algorithm have been done using only our "single classical world" (= Not quantum mechanical parallel worlds ).  Instead of parallel calculations using parallel worlds, physicists could just implement a single calculation at a time (= so, equal to classical computer ) by old-fashioned semi-classical method of resetting and recycling the qubits (= qunautum bit ).  ← No evidence or experiments proving quantum computer yet.

So physicists gave up the original high goal of quantum computer (= faster parallel computing using parallel worlds ), instead, they made up a new instrument called D-Wave which is irrelevant to the original quantum computer.

D-Wave is called "adiabatic" or "annealing" quantum computer, but it is Not even a computer or calculator at all.

In D-Wave machine, each bit is designed to just gradually approach the most stable (= lowest energy ) state without any "calculation".  This final lowest energy state is D-Wave version "solution" which value is artificially controlled and set up in advance, which means D-Wave cannot factorize or solve problems whose solutions are unknown, so an useless machine.

D-Wave which cannot utilize the power of quantum "parallel-worlds calculations" turned out to be Not faster than classical computers, contrary to the media-hype.

Global corporations and academia eagerly try to "advertize" Not-faster illusory quantum computer, seizing the opportunity of COVID-19 pandemic and use unrelated auto-makers to make impractical quantum computer "look" useful for getting research funds.

Shor's algorithm already lost its original high goal.  No evidence of quantum speed-up using many-worlds or a dead and alive cat.

These seeming Shor's factorizations are all fake, which just get qubits to approach the lowest-energy ground state like D-Wave fictitious machine after deliberately setting up already-known "solution" as ground-state in advance (= No ability to predict unknown solution, so useless unreal Shor's factorizing ) instead of actually calculating it.

In 2019, Google claimed they achieved so-called "quantum supremacy", but it turned out to be false.  Their quantum computer is Not faster or useful at all.

This sensational news is a typical example of global corporations, academia (= Caltech ) and journals (= Nature ) colluding to fabricate "fictitious science target" just for collecting research money from the world, by making it "look like" the first ( illusory ) quantum computer supremacy.

As I said, the current quantum computer is Not a computer or calculator.  In this quantum supremacy, all they did is generate some meaningless, chaotic "random numbers", which is completely useless.

So the quantum computer based on quantum mechanics, which is intrinsically uncertain, disorderly and chaotic, can only generate "random disorderly" meaningless numbers instead of implementing orderly and methodical computation which our ordinary computers and calculators are performing everyday.

Due to uncertainty principle, there is No way to obtain detailed useful information about each particle which is Not even allowed to have definite position, velocity and physical shape (= even whether a particle or wave is uncertain ).

Furthermore, Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics is unsolvable and useless in all multi-electron atoms, molecules and solids.  They just choose fake solution and fake energies, which calculation method is a kind of "art" rather than "science".

So quantum mechanics can only express many-electron solids as very abstract, nonphysical "bands" which just consist of a fictitious particles (= with No definite position or shape ) with fake (= effective ) mass, which can be even unrealistically negative mass.

And in order to describe various physical phenomena, quantum mechanics has to rely on "unreal quasiparticle model" with fake charge, which imaginary particle model got even Nobel prize ( this p.7 ).

The most widely used tool to calculate solids under useless quantum mechanics is the density functional theory (= DFT ) which treats the whole solid as "one fictitious electron" with non-interacting pseudo-potential ( this p.3 ) which very rough, nonphysical and forceful approximation always fails ( this p.17 ) miserably.

The current modern computer has nothing to do with this nonphysical "band or unreal quasiparticle model" used for quantum mechanics to describe the current condensed-matter or solid physics.

Semiconductor effect used in computer transistors has been known since before quantum mechanics was born in 1920s, and researchers improved it by classical "trial and error" approach, repeating many failures which showed the existing quantum mechanical theory was completely useless for developing computer transistor.

Each bit of ordinary computers is very simple, it only uses classical electric charge flow as an indicator of 0 or 1 in each bit.

Due to useless outdated atomic theory = disorderly quantum mechanics, researchers cannot advance to development of smaller, more sophisticated nano-machine which requires precise, orderly manipulation of atomic behavior.

So our computer technology and industry have already reached the limit, No more progress = Moore's law is ending.

As I said, quantum computers, which should be the "new frontier of science", still remain fantasy and impractical.  So the current computer technology is dead-ended with No future, as long as we stick to old outdated atomic physics.

You may often hear quantum computers use quantum "entanglement", which is often referred to as "faster-than-light spooky link" or teleportation.

But this entanglement cannot send any real faster-than-light information or affect other particles at all, so a completely meaningless concept.

This spooky quantum entanglement is Not a mythical or magical thing, it can be easily, artificially prepared and controlled by humans.

For example, when light passes through some special crystal, it splits into two lights (= photons ? ): one is vertically polarized and another is horizontally poralized light.  ←They just call these polarized light passing special crystal "entanglement".  ← No spooky action here.

When we measure it and know one of the light has vertical polarization, it instantly (= faster than light ? ) determines another light's polarization as "horizontal" (= because we prepare two lights with the opposite polarizations, vertical and horizontal in advance by passing the light through some crystal ).

That's all.  No faster-than-light link in this meaningless entanglement concept.

In 1981, Alain Aspect is said to have proved this (fake) faster-than-light entanglement using a pair of polarized light.  But actually these experiments proved nothing about unrealistic faster-than-light spooky entanglement.

Two misinterpretations of quantum mechanics caused this fantasy entanglement.  Quantum mechanics just misinterprets "the case when we do not know whether the classical light is vertically or horizontally polarized" as "two photons (= light particle ? ), one of which is vertically and another is horizontally polarized, coexist in parallel worlds".

So unreal quantum mechanics deliberately misinterpretes "classical mixed different states" as "different states coexisting using parallel worlds".  ← Nonsense.

And it also misinterprets "classical breakable light wave" as "an illusory unbreakbale photon particle".

In the experiment called "delayed-choice quantum eraser" in 1999, physicists spread the ridiculous idea that "the "past" can be erased !" which misconception was also caused by misinterpreting "classical breakable light wave" as an illusory "unbreakable" photon particle.

When the polarizers with perpendicular transmission axes cover the two slits, two lights after passing two slits have the polarizations perpendicular to each other, which cannot interfere with each other.  = So, after passing the two slits, these light lost the ability to interfere.

But after the light lost the ability to interfere, if we place another linear polarizer with its transmission axis oriented at 45o between two slits and the detector, light interference pattern reappeared !.  Light lost the ability to interfere. → place another polarizer. → interfere revived ( this p.6 ) ?  ← The past event (= lost interference ) was erased or rewrited !?

These stupid quantum mechanical unearthly ideas were caused by wrongly treating "ordinary mixed classical light waves with different polarizations" as an "illusory unbreakable photon particle coexisting in parallel worlds".

In 2012, prestigious Nobel prize was awarded to a fantasy dead and alive Schrödinger cat where Nobel committee believed in misconception that each ion can be in different energy states simultaneously using fictional parallel worlds ( this p.1 below ).

Of course, these Nobel prizes given to a fictional Schrödinger cat are still meaningless for our daily life, seen in the fact its only goal = quantum computer is still useless.

As long as we blindly listen to so-called "scientists" advocating unscientific quantum mechanical world, we can never progress towards real science or cure deadly viruses sweeping the world.

Actually, so-called "experts" or "scientists" in WHO spread false dangerous information "Don't wear masks" which fake advice surely contributed to increase in victims of coronaviruses across the world.

Furthermore, they push very old-fashioned technology = vaccine which effect could be unpredictable and harmful, because the current useless quantum mechanics is still obsessed with illusory particles and computer, which prevents us from developing effective drugs or real science clarifying underlying atomic behavior behind viral infection and immune response.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Most elementary particles are "unreal".

[ 'Scientists' pursue 'fictional' particles in vain. ]

(P-1)  ↓ Too many imaginary particles in  

In schools, students are taught that an atom is made of smaller particles such as electrons and nuclei which further split into unseen quarks.

But what if all textbooks are lying and almost all elementary particles are just illusion ?

The current "science" officially admits that there are too many elementary particles, most of which are unseen ghost-like objects and too short-lived to use in our daily lives.

Just two fundamental particles = an electron and a nucleus are enough to cause tremendously many different physical phenomena and complicated biological reactions.

So the number of "fundamental" or "elementary" particles must be very small.  The current too many elementary particles are highly unnatural.

In fact, almost all those elementary particles are unreal and unnecessary, Nobody has any troubles without those ghost-like particles.

How can we distinguish real particles from unreal particles ?

If an elementary particle does not have any influence on our activity, and we have No trouble even without the particle, it's safe to say this particle does Not exist.

More importantly, those "unnecessary particles" cannot be isolated as "independent distinct particles" from other real particles due to lack of physical reality like ghost.

In 1897, J.J. Thomson discovered an electron, demostrating cathode rays composed of electrons could be deflected by electric or magnetic fields.

In 1911, Rutherford found that there is a positive nucleus or proton in the center of each atom, after seeing alpha particles bounced off the dense nuclei.

Those "real" particles are abundant and stable enough to isolate from other particles for measuring their individual charge ( Millikan in 1909 ) or its charge to mass ratio precisely under controlled electric or magnetic fields.  ← So safe to say those "easily-isolated" particles are "real".

In 1932, Anderson claimed he discoverd a positron (= antimatter of an electron ) using a very old-fashioned particle detector called cloud chambers.

The cloud chamber contains a supersaturated vapor.  When a particle passes through the vapor, it knocks electrons off vapor molecules leaving ions behind.

Vapor condenses on these ions, resulting in a trail that can be photographed. The magnetic field applied to the cloud chamber caused charged particles to follow curved trail which direction told them whether the particle was negatively or positively charged.

Cosmic rays composed mostly of high energy protons, electrons and γ rays come from upper universe downwards into the cloud chamber on the earth.

But Anderson argued an antiparticle positron produced from the cosmic rays was observed to go "upwards" = strangely the "opposite" direction to cosmic rays.

The point is this cloud chamber cannot distinguish two positively charged particles of a positron and a proton, both of which are moving in the same direction in the same magnetic field.

The curvature of the particle's trail is affected only by the particle's momentum, Not by its mass.  So both positron and proton with the same charge and momentum leave exactly the same, indistinguishable trail in the cloud chamber.

Furthermore, it's impossible to distinguish a positron from a electron, too.

A negatively-charged electron should turn in the opposite direction from a positvely-charged positron under the magnetic field.  So if this track is caused by an electron instead of a positron, the electron came down from the above like other cosmic rays.

They claim the track indicates this particle lost its energy after penetrating the lead plate upwards (= increase in curvature of the top half of the track after it passed the lead ), so this track should be a positiron moving upwards instead of an electron moving downwards.

But this logic is unreliable.  Much more black spots (= caused by ionized atoms excited by much more high energy cosmic rays ) are seen in the upper side of the lead plate.  So the electron's trail could be easily bent by strong electric fields of ionized atoms in the upper side not only by magnetic field .

Therefore, an electron bent by ionized atoms in the cloud chamber could make Anderson misinterpret an electron ( or proton ) as an imaginary positron.

The only practical use of antiparticles is said to be PET scan where they can detect just gamma rays (= antiparticle itself is undetectable ) which are allegedly emitted by annihilation of an electron and a positron produced by some radioactive nuclei containing too many protons.

This positron emission is unrealistic and physically impossible, because a lighter proton has to split into a heavier neutron and a positron.

Later, physicists found many cases that contradicts positron emission which cannot occur when the energy difference between the parent atom and daughter atom is less than 1022 keV (= the sum of Einstein's mc2 mass energeis of an electron and a positron ).

So in 1934, they needed to accept another new realistic reaction called "electron capture" which produces coincidentally the same resulting particles as the positron emission in more reasonable way.

Both electron capture and positron emission change one proton into one neutron in some radioactive nuclei.  ← Exactly the same reaction.  ← Too good to be true, and one of them must be unreal.

Only their processes leading to the same resultant particles are different.  In electron capture, a proton just absorbs an external electron.  In positron emission, first, a proton splits into a heavier neutron and a positron which then annihilates absorbing an external electron.

PET scan does Not need an antiparticle or a positron at all, because electron capture causing the same nuclear reaction and gamma rays can perfectly replace the fictional positron emission.

The present physics says when a particle and an antiparticle meet, they annihilate to produce an unreal virtual photon (= light ) with fictitious mass.  ← Relying on unreal virtual particles means all the current antiparticle reactions are just illusion.

First of all, when neutral light produces a pair of a particle (= negatively charged electron ) and antiparticle (= positively charged positron ), separating those two opposite chaged particles needs infinitely large energy.

Because a negative electron and a positive positiron must be completely fused into one and packed into the initial neutral light, = the distance between an electron and a positron inside the neutral light (= virtual photon ) must be almost zero.

Coulomb attractive energy between fused negative electron and a positive positron (= their distance is zero ) should be infinitely huge, hence separating those opposite charged particle and antiparticle attracting each other strongly should require infinitely large energy in addition to their mass mc2 energy = 2 × 511 keV.

This infinitely large energy required to separate an electron from a positron is Not considered in the current particle physics.  ← antiparticle theory is inconsistent and false.

As a result, antiparticles are unrealistic, physically unreasonable and unneeded in PET device where the realistic electron capture can perfectly explain and replace positron emission effect.

Another elementary particle called muon is said to be found as a charged particle a little heavier than an electron in the cloud chamber in 1947 ( this p.15 ).

As I said, the cloud chamber which just photographs static particle's trails cannot distinguish or indentify each elementary particle with the same momentum.  All physicists can do is just claim the trail left in cloud chamber may "possibly" indicate another new elementary particle such as a "muon" with No definite proof.

This muon is also an unnecessary particle, because a very short-lived muon easily decays into other elementary particles such as electron and neutrino.  ← It's highly inappropriate to categorize a muon which easily "breaks" into other smaller particles as a "fundamental" particle.

The present particle physics just treats "electrons or protons" moving at almost light speed whose extremely high energy is enough to easily pass through solid materials, as "fictional muons".

So we don't need "muon" which phenomena can be replaced by other real charged particles such as electrons and protons.

In 1964, Gell-Mann proposed ad-hoc elementary particles called "quarks" which are said to have illusory fractional-charge (= +2/3, -1/3 ).

These quarks with fractional charge are always "unseen", can never be isolated or observed directly.  ← No evidence of quarks or fractional charges at all.

Physicists tried to investigate the quarks by firing electrons at protons and observing how electrons bounced off.  But it's impossible to know the exact property of an individual quark with fractional charge, because quarks are inseparable, always attaching to other quarks by infinitely strong forces.

The pattern of electrons scattered by protons ( or nucleus ) was much more complicated than the original quark model where Gell-Mann considered each proton consists only of three quarks.

So they introduced other new ad-hoc concept called "virtual sea quarks and virtual anti-quarks" ( this p.4 ), which can never be isolated or detected, so meaningless "ghost-like" elementary particles, too.

Physicists were unable to isolate those highly unstable and unobservable elementary particles to utilize them in practical science or developing new real physical theory.

Isolation of stable elementary particles are essential to confirm them as real and utilize them in useful science.

The current particle physics ignoring this fact just tries to prepare "artificial virtual circumstances" to seemingly create artificial (= fictional ) elementary particles for developing their ad-hoc pseudo-theory.

These "artificial virtual circumstances" are "particle accelerators" such as Large Hadron collider which just waste huge taxpayers' money in vain.

Particle physicists accelerate, collide real particles such as electrons and protons, and claim some ( fictional ) short-lived particles such as antiparticle and quarks might be created for only an instant and soon decay into other final stable real particles such as electrons, protons and light which can be detected.

Particle accelerators cannot isolate or identify new unstable (= doubtful ) elementary particles directly.  Physicists just "imagine" new virtual particles only inside their heads, saying those elusive particles might be created for only incredibly short time, but soon decayed when they tried to observe them !  ← Nonsense.

In 1974, physicists "claimed" they might find slight evidence of charm quarks at SLAC accelerator.  And in 1977, they "claimed" new bottom quarks were discovered by analysing a pile of garbage data of other irrelevant particles in the accelerator.  ← No reliable evidence of quarks.  Physicists just "claimed" them.

In 1995, Fermilab accelerator announced the discovery of top quark which is too short-lived to observe its trail.  Those doubtful unstable particles are said to appear for only an extremely short time and just once in trillions of collisions of other real particles such as protons and electrons.

The present standard model says a neutron can decay into unrealistic, unseen weak boson which are said to be much heavier than the original neutron or proton in beta decay.

A lighter and smaller particle (= neutron ) emits a heavier and bigger particle (= W boson ) ?  ← Impossible !

So physicists started to say this unrealistically heavy weak ( or W ) boson is just a ghost-like virtual particle which does Not exist.  ← Developing realistic, consistent physical theory to clarify underlying real mechanism is impossible due to ghost-like "virtual particles" in the current particle physics.

In 2012, CERN announced they found "God-particle Higgs".
Despite long time research, these Higgs and unseen quarks are still useless and meaningless for our daily life except for physicists to make money by selling "sci-fi" books or getting prestigious prizes.

Higgs is said to give mass to all particles which is the reason it's called "God particle".  But in fact, Higgs boson which was allegedly found in Large Hadron collider cannot give mass.  ← So No evidence of Higgs giving mass.

Undetectable Higgs "field" (= Not Higgs boson ) is said to fill space around us and give mass to other particles.  But its detailed physical mechanism of giving mass is unknown, unrealistic and contradictory.

The current particle physics has No ability to describe actual physical phenomena using concrete tools.

All these imaginary elementary particles which can "appear" only inside accelerators or physicists' heads have No impact on our society, hence, physically meaningless particles.  Then, why are physicists wasting time in pursuing these illusory particles ?

To keep getting research funds, physicists needed to keep developing their "empty theory", even if the theories have No relation to real physical phenomena.  This dire situation motivated physicists to fabricate some "fictitious target" called "symmetry".

This "symmetry" is just an unphysical, artificial math concept which has nothing to do with our actual world ( this p.4 ).

One of these unphysical "symmetries" is supersymmetry ( or SUSY ) which requires every particle to have its associated "supersymmetric shadow particles" which are undetectable, hence, just fiction.

By uniting this artificial supersymmetry with fantasy 26-dimensional string theory which was surprisingly physicists' "best candidate" for unified theory, they invented new fantasy 10-dimensional superstring theory which is now called Einstein dream or "theory of everything" despite its fictional extradimensions.

This superstring theory is also purely unphysical math which has nothing to do with our real world ( this p.10 ), and meaningless due to its inability to predict any physical values because it contains an incredible number (= 10500 ! ) of freely-adjustable parameters.

The current unphysical theory can only urge physicists to create more imaginary new particles instead of looking more deeply into underlying physical reality of the already-existing particles (= even actual physical "shape" of each elementary particle is uncertain forever as long as we rely on today's unphysical theory ).

One of those new imaginary particles is "dark photon" which is said to interact with invisible dark matter via new "fifth force", which is still fiction.

Quantum mechanics forbids physicists to think about underlying detailed mechanism in a realistic way, instead, forces them to accept fantasy parallel worlds, virtual particles and too many new imaginary particles.

This unrealistic quantum mechanics which has confused physicists over the past 100 years is the origin of the current miserable particle physics full of meaningless elementary particles which do Not exist except inside physicists' "imagination".

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Worthless science

[ Black hole "science" is meaningless, going nowhere. ]

(B-1)  ↓ Continue useless    research forever ?

What if some global authority or organization invented some "fictional concept" and try to make it look like "science" ?

Those organization called "academia" can continue making large profits, getting taxpayers' money in the name of "science research", and squeeze extra money from students just by giving empty lecture and selling seemingly "science" books, forever.

Black hole is one of those "fake science", which research has No value, pursuing "illusory" unseen concept which science has never affected or improved our daily life, as if black hole did Not exist, for more than 100 years.

Black hole has been a counterintuitive, paradoxical and uncanny concept that has never stopped puzzling physicists since the idea of black hole was first proposed by Einstein.

In 1915, Einstein came up with the new theory called general relativity which predicted the existence of uncanny 'black hole'.  Einstein himself didn't accept this crazy black hole or quantum mechanics, which were purerly unscientific.

Soon after that, Schwarzschild derived the first black hole solution from Einstein general relativistic theory.  Their black hole was highly enigmatic, nothing but a fairy-tale object that cannot be explained by real physical things.

According to their solution, any objects, even light can Not escape from black hole, because their odd theory claims the clock time freezes to a stop on the surface (= called event horizon ) of black hole ( this p.10 ).

So if Einstein black hole was true, we could Never observe those uncanny black holes from the earth, because the infinitely slowing down time (= clocks stop ticking ) prevents black holes from forming, which should take "infinite time".

It means research on "non-existing (= illusory )" black holes proved to be completely meaningless scientifically, just a waste of an incredible amount of time and money in useless telescopes and satellites..

The influence of Einstein relativity on physical phenomena is supposed to be negligibly tiny, so we can live a normal life with No problem even without Einstein.

Scientists just repeat meaningless "tests" of Einstein relativity, which effect is too small to believe, all the year round only to get research funds from taxpayers' money, forgetting practical use of Einstein pseudo-science.

The results of these Einstein tests have No impact on our daily life up until now and from now on.  ← scientifically "worthless" tests and theory.

They say Einstein general relativity "predicted" the perihelion of the orbit of the Mercury advances only 0.012 degrees per century.  ← too tiny effect to believe.

First of all, it is technically almost impossible to measure the perfectly exact orbit of Mercury with such a extremely tiny error, especially in such old times = it was supposed to have been measured since more than 200 years ago ?

And even now, it is impossible to know the exact masses of planets or the mass imbalance inside a planet, which can affect the planetary motion directly.  There are other many large unknown factors in the universe that may affect the planetary motion slightly, such as solar pressure or meteorites..

So using this negligibly tiny and doubtful Mercury motion variation over extremely long period (= 100 years ! ) as a "successful" evidence of Einstein relativity is unreasonable and ridiculous.

In 1919, it is said that Eddington could observe the light was bent very slightly by Einstein general relativistic effect called "gravitational lens" around the Sun during a solar eclipse.

But the "light bending" is Not peculiar to Einstein relativity.  Well-known "classical light refraction" by atmospheric molecules has far bigger effect on light bending than fishy general relativistic effect which is too tiny to believe.

In places where there are Not visible stars or gravity, but light bending was actually observed, they had to rely on artificial ad-hoc "invisible dark matter" which is nothing but an old aether that has been discarded by Einstein.  ← self-contradictory theory

Therefore, so-called Einstein relativistic effect, which is too small to believe, is hidden or replaced by other more realistic factors or things such as far more obvious atmospheric light-bending effect around the stars.

We do Not need Einstein fantasy, paradoxical theory at all, because we can perfectly replace Einstein's far-fetched misinterpretation of physical phenomena by other more realistic and tangible objects or models, without any trouble.

The only practical use of Einstein relativity is said to be "prediction" of very tiny GPS time error.  But this is untrue.  Einstein theory has No ability to predict anything in real world.  The biggest error source that could affect GPS clock time is "atmosphere".

Einstein theory is unnecessary and useless in GPS time correction.
Because control stations on the earth always have to monitor and correct unpredictable GPS time error real-time, irrelevant to Einstein relativity.

Completely "empty" space cannot generate forces such as gravity, because nothing occurs from "nothing".  It is quite natural to think there must be some real substance or "medium" to generate and mediate actual gravitational force.

Ironically, Einstein relativity rejecting "real medium" in space needs "unreal virtual particles" with negative mass as force mediators, which pseudo-objects contradict Einstein original mc2 relation.  ← The current physics is self-contradictory, again !

Real "science" should explain real forces by physically real tangible objects, Not by illusory virtual particles of the current contradictory "mainstream" theory.

It's no wonder that the density difference of this real medium causing gravity difference, may be one of factors that can affect the slight motion of objects or sensitive atomic clocks, which was unfortunately misinterpreted as Einstein fantasy paradoxical time dilation.

As I said, if we can replace Einstein tiny relativistic effect by other more realistic, reliable sources or models, we do Not need to rely on Einstein 'fairy-tale' relativity at all.  ← We can advance to the new real practical "science" after freeing from Einstein old, obsolete theory.

In fact, Einstein relativity includes fatal flaws and paradoxes.  So we need other more legitimate interpretation of physical phenomena such as light bending and GPS time error, using real things such as atmosphere or medium.

Because in Einstein relativity, the time is "relative" (= Not absolute ) illusion where the clock time could change differently seen by different observers !  So the satellite's clock time cannot be determined as the single common one, which is unusable, causing serious twin paradox.  ← Einstein theory is false.

We cannot use this illusory 'paradoxical' time concept proposed by Einstein ad-hoc theory in actual GPS atomic clock to compare actual time errors.

Black hole is supposed to be unseen, hence, always 'black', emitting No lights.  How could astronomers find seemingly conclusive evidence of ghost-like black hole ?

In 1960s, scientists detected some "light", which was very red-shifted (= light wavelength got longer than normal ).  The red-shift means this light was emitted from very distant (= billions light years away ? ) stars called quasar.

The fact that light remains bright in spite of being emitted from very distant stars indicates this star must have very strong gravity attracting and accelerating many dusts and gases around it, which eventually lose energy and emit strong lights by collisions between high-energy accelerated gases.

Physicists jumped to a hasty conclusion that the source of this strong gravity and bright light is black hole, though black hole itself cannot be detected or emit light.  ← contradiction, again.

There are serious problems and flaws in the current interpretation of black hole.  Many mechanisms about black hole and jets still remain unknown and mystery despite long-time research.

First, there is No way to know the exact distance between the earth and very distant stars or black holes which are said to be extremely "far away" (= billions of light years away ! ) from the earth.

It means whether the source of bright light is really massive black hole with strong gravity or not is still unknown and doubtful.

Astronomers have to rely on some "artificial ad-hoc models" based on fantasy BigBang theory and light redshifted by expanding universe to roughly estimate how far away the star is from the earth.  ← These pseudo-science cannot be used as "reliable" evidence of black hole.

In order to prove that black hole is a very dense and massive object, they need to know the exact size and mass of a black hole.

Again, it is impossible to know the exact size and mass of an unseen black hole which is too distant from the earth to observe its shape and motion.

Especially, the estimation of black hole size is based on very unscientific and unreasonable assumption where they concluded black hole is very small just because the brightness of light ( allegedly emitted from around black hole ) fluctuates very rapidly.  ← ??

The "fluctuation of light brightness or intensity" has nothing to do with the black hole size.   ← No evidence of black hole, again.

Strange to say, most nearer black holes are inactive = Not emitting bright light at all, as seen in the center of our galaxy, Milky Way.  ← Definition of black hole (= bright object ) is inconsistent and doubtful.

By observing some star's motion around black hole, they try to estimate the gravitational force and mass of unseen black hole in galactic center.  But we cannot even see these stars allegedly orbiting around black hole, because thick dusts and debris always cover and hide the large area around black holes.

Neither visible light nor stars near black hole can be observed (= Not used as a clue to unseen black hole ) due to thick dusts, so it is still uncertain whether there are really some stars orbiting around black hole or not , as the current "science" insists only from unreliable evidence.

Ignoring this fact, astronomers exercise their imagination and try to picture the motion of "invisible stars" (= allegedly around black hole ) by observing infrared light or x rays (= because No visible light can be observed, covered by thick dusts ) which can penetrate dusts.

So the so-called "first photo of black hole" is fake, because visible light used in this picture cannot be emitted either from unseen black hole or dusts around black hole.

After wasting a large amount of time and money in unseen fictional black hole over the past 100 years, all scientists can do is claim they might take the first ( fake ) photo of black hole ?  ← Black hole "science" is miserably unnecessary.

Physicists repeat the so-called "tests of Einstein theory" in vain by observing the redshifted light emitted from ( unseen ) stars allegedly orbiting around invisible black hole.

If Einstein relativity was true, the frequency of light emitted from stars near massive black hole should be smaller (= hence, light wavelength gets longer → redshift ) due to slower time by gravitational time dilation of massive black hole.

But these Einstein tests are doubtful and unreliable, too.
Because as I said, even stars around black hole cannot be seen due to thick dusts around black hole.  ← No tools to know the black hole.

Furthermore, there are many high-energy particles moving around ( black hole ? ) at extremely high speed in galactic center, which could emit light whose wavelength are drastically elongated (= red-shifted ) by classical Doppler shift caused by high-speed particles, which effect is far bigger than very tiny Einstein's redshifted light effect allegedly caused by negligibly tiny black hole gravitational time dilation.

As shown here, there has been Not a single conclusive evidence of black hole which is just an imaginary distant object created by Einstein ad-hoc theory and academia.

In addition to detecting light, physicists try to detect so-called "gravitational waves" which were allegedly emitted from the collision between two black holes.

But this explanation is false and self-contradictory, because the time should stop around black hole, it means black holes also must be frozen to a stop seen from the earth, hence, cannot move or collide with other black hoeles to generate gravitational waves !

So if Einstein relativity about black hole was true, it was impossible to detect gravitational wave emitted from unseen black hole collision.

Actually this gravitational wave is completely useless and too faint to detect or believe.  They say LIGO detector arm changes only by very tiny, tiny 1/10000 proton diamater, which too small change is not only meaningless for our daily life but also scientifically impossible to detect, hence, unreliable.

Because electrons inside LIGO mirror reflecting light whose interference is used for detecting very tiny change of LIGO arm's length by gravitational wave are always moving around over much larger area than tiny nucleus (= proton ) size.  Hence, this extremely tiny change ( only by 1/10000 of proton diameter ) was undetectable, easily hidden by electrons' large uncertain fluctuation inside LIGO detector.

Futhermore, this gravitational wave is expressed only as an unreal ad-hoc concept called "pseudo-tensor" ( which is different from ordinary true "tensor" used in Einstein original general relativity ).

Even Einstein rejected this contradictory ad-hoc gravitational wave ( this p.18 ) which cannot even carry real energy according to original Einstein theory !

So there is No reliable evidence of black hole or gravitational wave.
These imaginary concepts even include self-contradictions and fatal flaws.

Black hole "science" with No influence on our daily lives is useless, meaningless except for making "sci-fi movie", selling "sci-fi books", giving meaningless lecture in the name of "science history", which is just "literature" rather than "science".

The present best unified theory, so-called "theory of everything" is fantasy eleven-dimensional string or M theory proposed by Witten.

Physicists all over the world are wasting their time in trying to solve meaningless imaginary paradox about information which may be lost inside black hole ?  ← These empty pseudo-science has nothing to do with our real life.

One solution is they concluded "There are No black holes".
Another solution is using fictional extra-dimensions, which is No longer a real "science" ( this p.25 ).

Even if black hole was real (= though impossible ), it is too far away from the earth to confirm.  And black hole can never be created in labs due to "stopped time" according to Einstein general relativity.

So no matter how much time and money we waste on the research on "imaginary" black hole or fantasy BigBang, it is meaningless, getting us nowhere.

This is why the current academia started to use prestigious Nobel prize and journals as "fictitious targets" to make us falsely believe the current research on those (fake) science is worth spending taxpayers' money for.

As long as we are brainwashed into believing the current fake science is real, developing "science" to cure deadly diseases and viruses is an impossible dream, forever.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

School education  is meaningless.

[ Schools just spread viruses and teach useless "science". ]

(S-1)  ↓ No benefit in sending students to risky  

School becomes the most dangerous place on the earth, which could be a hotbed of spreading deadly coronavirus now.

What if the current schools just indoctrinate students with useless, obsolete old "science" which has Not progressed for 100 years ?

It's extremely difficult to force all students to keep "social distance" and wearing masks all the time in schools.  Forcing such an unusual and stressful task on students is Not what a normal school does.

Do such abnormal circumstances in today's education after pandemic really help students grow up healthy and learn useful things ?

Sending and confining students to the current old-fashioned school system whose teaching style has Not changed from ancient Aristotelian era, is really worth taking the risk of increasing virus infection and debt, paying exorbitant tuition and boading fee even in this internet era ?

If the purpose of entering schools is just to meet other students, it doesn't need schools.  There are many other occasions to interact with people in other places or at work in much safer ways.

So the only purpose of students going to "dangerous" schools is to learn "science" which should be useful enough to overshadow the risk of getting deadly viruses.

The problem is the current so-called "science" taught in these dangerous schools during the pandemic really contributes to improving our daily lives ?  Risking students' lives by confining them in schools = incubators of viruses is really a right decision ?

In fact, our "science" makes No progress for an extremely long time.
Students are wasting their precious time and money in today's meaningless schools, which old-style education is harmful not just for their future but for our economy.

No matter how long students study "science" in schools, it is a waste of time, going nowhere.  ← This is reality.

All living things, materials and physical phenomena are caused by atoms and molecules.  So correct understanding of atomic behavior is essential for developing all science and curing diseases.

Since quantum mechanics was born as an atomic theory in 1926, human's basic science research has come to a dead end.  The only atomic calculation tool for quantum mechanics is Schrödinger equation, which form has Not changed for 100 years despite its unrealistic nature.

Though the media and academia always repeat empty platitude "quantum mechanics is an enormously successful theory", still nobody understands the physical meaning of this weird quantum mechanics.

They are lying.  Quantum mechanics is Not successful at all.

The only way to know atomic states in quantum mechanics is to solve Schrödinger equation and get its exact solution (= wavefunction ).

But Schrödinger equation cannot be solved in any multi-electron atoms, which means there is No way to know the exact atomic state (= wavefunction ) by quantum mechanical method.

All physicists can do is choose (= Not solve ) some arbitrary fake solution called trial function with freely-adjustable parameters or basis set.

In this meaningless approximation, "Guessing and choosing fake solution" of unsolvable Schrödinger equation shows quantum mechanics is a kind of "art" rather than science.

This quantum mechanical calculation only gives unphysical "fake energy" by integrating chosen fake solution (= guess wavefunction ) instead of the original method of solving Schrödinger equation.

Choosing arbitrary fake solution (= basis set ) out of infinite choices to get meaningless atomic energy means Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics has No ability to predict any physical values (= because they just "choose" the desired values ).

The serious problem is quantum wave function tells us nothing about the position and velocity of each electron due to ridiculous uncertainty principle.

They claim each electron always thinly and widely spreads as a vague electron cloud over all space, which unphysical electron picture leads to the fantasy idea that each electron can exist in different places simultaneously like a ghost haunting parallel worlds.

Quantum mechanical fantasy notion = each particle being in different states and places at once is often likened to an imaginary Schrödinger cat which can be dead and alive simultaneously.

Also in two-slit experiment, quantum mechanics avoids clear mechanism of uncanny interference and just accepts the impossible idea that a single particle can pass through two slits simultaneously using fanatsy parallel worlds.

This quantum mechanical picture of an electron treated as a spreading vague cloud causes other serious problems which makes it impossible to describe real moleclar bonds.

A spreading electron cloud cannot avoid other electrons, because each electron always spreads all over space, which is completely different from a realistic electron picture (= point-like charged particle ).

This quantum mechanical electron cloud is inconsistent with and unable to explain real physical phenomena where electrons should be always moving and avoiding each other by Coulomb repulsive forces between negatively charged electrons.

So in this quantum mechanical electron cloud model, even naturally occurring phenomena (= negative electrons are attracted to positive nuclei enough to generate stable molecular bonds by avoiding other negative electrons ) is impossible, because negative spreading cloud, which cannot avoid other electrons, always shields nuclei from other negative electron cloud.

Therefore, quantum mechanics has to rely on "cheating" to generate fake Coulomb attractive energy by violating basic physical principle taught in school = total energy conservation law and illegitimately lowering kinetic energy using artificially introduced unscientific concept = exchange integral ( this p.11 ).  ← School "science" is false ?

Calculating basic Couloumb force or energy can be very easily and accurately done between classical (= realistic ) electrons treated as point-like charged particles.

But calculating Coulomb force between two electron clouds of quantum mechanics is impossible.  Only Coulomb (fake) energy can be calculated by very time-consuming integration of two overlapped electron clouds (= wavefunction ) over all space ( this p.27 ).

So quantum mechanics gave up treating many-electron atoms (= very time-consuming in electron cloud model ) or solids as they are.  Instead, they treat all materials as "unphysical band model" consisting of only one unreal quasi-electron with fictitious (= effective ) mass which can even be unrealistic negative mass ( this p.13 ).

Furthermore, useless quantum mechanics relies on unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge to explain various phenomena such as semiconductor, crystal, solar cell, which pseudo-quantum model got prestigious Nobel prize ( this p.8 ), this highest oldest science authority is the largest obstacle to innovation now.

This is very serious and disastrous situation, because the current only atomic theory = quantum mechanics cannot explain ordinary physical phenomena or materials around us using real particles except unreal quasiparicles.  And they never try to improve this situation or replace this ridiculous unreal quasiparticle model by real one, which attitude prevent today's science from developing forever.

The current main calculation tool of all materials also relies on unreal quantum mechanical approximation called density functional theory (= DFT ) which treats many-electron materials as unreal pseudo-material consisting of one single pseudo-electron.

They say this one pseudo-electron in DFT ( or Kohn-Sham theory ) are non-interacting with other electrons, moving in fictional (= effective ) potential energy.

This fake non-interacting potential energy is called exchange-correlation functional which form is unknown and arbitrary, can be chosen or changed artificially.

So the current most widely used DFT approximate method of quantum mechanics is completely useless and ridiculous with No ability to predict any physical values, because they just "choose" some desired values or potential energy artificially like impractical Schrödinger equation.

No matter what fake potential energy (= functional ) form is chosen, someone will always find a case where it fails ( this p.17 ).

Applying this meaningless basic physics to other practical fields such as biology, medicine and electronics is impossible., because the basic quantum mechanics uses only fictitious quasi-particle model ( this p.22 ) to describe phenomena, and they never try to replace these unreal particles by real atomic model.  ← Nonsense.

The current basic quantum mechanics is completely useless stuck in fictional particles and models, which cannot predict any actual phenomena at the atomic level.  Therefore, other applied science has to rely on old primitive "trial and error" approach to invent or find something blindly with No clue to underlying atomic mechanism.

Discovery of transistor used in computer semiconductor is also achieved by this old-fashioned trial and error approach, because the current band theory based on quantum mechanical unreal quasiparticle model cannot be used in practical science at all.

Actually, this trial-and-error approach has already reached the limit; Moore's law is ending, which means Computer technology makes No more progress without breakthrough, stuck in the current outdated basic physics or quantum mechanical ghost theory.

Molecular biology such as PCR, antibody tests also relies on old-fashioned trial and error technique to find and exploit natural bacterial enzymes and natural immune system which were created by Mother Nature (= Not human technology ) a long, long time ago.  Useless basic atomic theory = quantum mechanics can do nothing in these applied science such as biology.

The current researchers still use this old trial and error approach for seeking new treatment of coronavirus, like ancient people tried to find "miracle drugs" among natural plants or herbs without the knowledge of basic atomic behavior.

All these blind trial and error approach failed so far, seeing we are still unable to stop patients from dying from deadly viruses COVID-19 across the world.

The only hope left now seems to be very old, outdated technique = vaccination, which basic method has Not changed for 200 years.  ← Medicine has Not progressed for an extremely long time due to useless atomic physics = quantum mechanics.

Vaccine is also based on ancient trial and error approach to find miracle viral antigen which may stimulate our whimsical natural immune system to produce desired antibodies against viruses someday.

About this process of finding "miracle" vaccine or drug, there is almost Nothing our current outdated human technology can do.  All we can do is blind trial and error method, praying to God that clinical trials (= which often failed ) may go well.

The effect of vaccination is uncertain and unpredictable like Heisenberg quantum theory, and it may cause severe side effect, because we cannot apply the useless basic quantum mechanics (= unreal quasiparticle and one pseudo-electron model ) to predicting underlying molecular mechanism of viral infection and our body's immune response.

So the current so-called "science" taught in schools, which makes No progress since a century ago, is completely useless and helpless, when we try to apply it in other practical fields.  ← Finding effective drug or vaccine for coronavirus is a pipe dream forever.

If the basic physics remains useless with No progress, all applied science such as medicine stops progressing, we have to rely on old-fashioned, time-consuming "trial and error" approach to find some "miracle cure" blindly, which primitive methodology does Not need school education at all, even by taking risks of spreading viruses.

The basic science based on quantum mechanics which students learn in schools is nothing but fake science, hence learning all applied science in schools is meaningless, too.

In school physics, you probably learned the energy and momentum are always conserved.

But if this energy conservation law taught in school is true, each electron cannot emit real light (= photon ).  The current physics says contradictory things: forces around us are just illusion caused by unreal virtual particles with imaginary mass ( this p.3 ) !

The current only "theory of everything" uniting quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity is string theory which just brainwashes students into believing fantasy extra-dimensions and wrong math (= 1+2+3+ .. = -1/12 according to string theory ) which contradicts the high school's basic math.

You can easily know the current "science" is Fake, unrealiable, seeing so-called "scientists" spread false information "Don't wear Mask", exacerbating pandemic, and still treat fictitious global warming as a threat, though warmer temperature clearly reduces the death toll.

Today's schools and universities tend to be corrupt, resting on their highest academic status in the name of (fake) "science", and now become a hotbed of life-threatening viruses by giving meaningless lectures and selling books about science fiction only for their own interest, which just ruins students' future and lives.

Ironically, unusually cold weather is sweeping the world against so-called "experts" or scientists' fishy global warming prediction and model.

We should rethink the validity and reality of school science education during this pandemic, I think.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

The current "Science" is Not "science".

[ "Many" electrons → "One" pseudo-electron = current physics ? ]

(U-1)  ↓ Unreal quantum mechanics DFT in  

The current "science" is helpless before deadly Covid-19 viruses.
All drugs failed to stop the death by this coronavirus so far.

Very old technology = vaccine development takes a lot of time and is likely to be ineffective, may cause severe side effects due to its uncertain producing method which completely depends on whimsical and unpredictable natural immune system.

Our inability to control deadly viruses inside bodies is due to our inability to control "atoms" which compose all molecules, proteins and viruses.

In fact, as long as we depend on the current only atomic theory = quantum mechanics which is No better than "fiction", we can Never control atoms or viruses, hence, developing effective drugs is a "pipe dream" forever.

Because the current atomic theory = 100-year-old quantum physics is irrational, it forbids us from treating a "many-electron molecule" as a "many-electron molecule" !  ← Unrealistic, absurd theory.

Many-electron atoms or molecules in the actual world are Not treated as ones containing many electrons, instead, they are treated like completely "different material" in the quantum mechanical unphysical world.  How ?

Surprisingly, the current atomic theory forces us to explain all "many-electron materials" such as crystals, proteins and viruses as if they were other fictitious materials consisting of only "One single pseudo-electron".

A many-electron material  ← actual world.
A single pseudo-electron material  ← quantum mechanical world !

Why does today's basic atomic theory = quantum mechanics become so absurd, unscientific and unable to treat actual materials as they are ?

When you look at research papers about all materials such as semiconductors, solids, molecules, superconductors, proteins, you will notice all those papers use the single common atomic calculation method called "density functional theory" (= DFT,  this p.2 ).

DFT is the most widely used quantum mechanical approximation in solid physics composed of large molecules.  The distinctive character of DFT is it uses only One single pseudo-electron in any materials.

Molecules, crystals, proteins, all materials consist of many electrons.

But Schrödinger equation = quantum mechanical calculation tool is too complicated and time-consuming to handle these many electrons ( this p.3, this p.8 )  in addition to its unreality.

So in 1965, Kohn and Sham dumped useless Schrödinger equation, and invented its bogus one-electron fictitious approximation = density functional theory (= called DFT or Kohn-sham theory, this p.2 ).

Because if an actual many-electron material can be replaced by a fictitious material composed of only one single virtual electron, its calculation becomes much easier !  But of course, this pseudo-material favored by quantum mechanics is uneal.

DFT can use only One single fictitious non-interacting electron which replaces original potential energies or interactions among many electrons by unreal (= effective ) pseudo-potentials ( this p.6,  this p.25 ) with No interaction between electrons.

They claim this fake one electron acts like an unreal quasi-particle which has fake ( effective ) mass and charge inside any materials ( this p.3 ).

It's impossible to describe physical phenomena of actual "many-electron materials" and their interactions as "one fictitious electron" with virtually No interaction, so this fictitious DFT always fails despite its wide use and dominant status in today's computing physics ( this p.17 ) .

This one-electron pseudo-electron model used in the present almost all condensed matter physics research poses serious problems when we try to apply the absurd basic physics to other fields such as medicine.

We already have the technology of observing and manipulating each single atom one by one using commercially available devices such as atomic force microcope.

So a virus which is far bigger than an atom is No longer an "invisible" enemy for our current technology by which we should be able to know detailed atomic picture of viral infection and find effective treatment for coronavirus.

But still we cannot utilize that already-existing excellent technology of manipulating a single atom in applied science or medicine, due to this useless one pseudo-electron atomic model caused by fantasy quantum mechanics.

One pseudo--electron means DFT method can use only one variable (= r ) designating only one elecron's motion even in many-electron materials which should originally use many variables (= r1, r2, r3 .. ) representing many electrons and their motions.  ← Very unscientific approximation !

In chemical reaction when an electron moves from donor to acceptor molecules, these three molecules (= moving electron, donor, acceptor molecules ) have to be treated as three separate different things, so we need to prepare at least more than three different kinds of electrons or their variables designating their motions and positions to explain this chemical reaction.

But quantum mechanics DFT cannot handle even this simple chemical reaction.

Because DFT can only treat these "three different molecules or electrons (= moving in three different ways )" as "one fake electron", which cannot describe real atomic interaction or chemical reaction caused by more than one electron.

Calculating forces between these several molecules is impossible for DFT which cannot distinguish even several differently-moving molecules due to its pseudo-one-electron unphysical approximation.

When we move each different atom to different places using atomic force microscope, we need to distinguish and treat these different atoms (= atoms moving in different directions in different places ) as different objects to explain this motion or dynamical behavior.

But one pseudo-electron DFT model always treats even these obviously different atoms or elecrons as one same unreal electron interacting with No other electrons expressed by only one fictitious variable, which unphysical basic physics forbids us from applying it to bigger molecules, proteins or viruses.  ← Finding effective treatment is impossible under the current "science" or pseudo-atomic theory.

Fictitious non-interacting potential energy including only one pseudo-electron used in DFT is called exchange-correlation functional, which form is unknown ( this p.47 ) and has nothing to do with actual physical phenomena caused by many-electron materials and their actual potential energies.

The kind of these pseudo-potentials (= functional ) used in DFT calculation is arbitrary, can be artificially chosen, so quantum mechanics or DFT cannot predict or describe actual physical phenomena ( this p.16, this p.7 ).  ← completely useless in applied science.

Surprisingly, even the latest researches on observing and manipulating each different atom using atomic force microscope adopt this useless one pseudo-electron DFT model as the only calculation tool to interpret observed many-electron interaction ( this p.6, this p.5 ).

This contradictory quantum mechanics treating actual multi-electron matetials as a single pseudo-electron model causes other contradictory idea that Pauli repulsion, which force can be actually measured by atomic force microscope as a contact force, cannot be treated as a real force ( this p.6, this p.10 ).  ← self-contradiction !

Observe different atoms in different places ← The current physics treats all these different atoms as One single pseudo-electron model. ← This useless meaningless theory cannot be applied to bigger molecules or medicine.  ← No effective drug development.  ← now.

All these problems originate in 1920s when we did Not have modern computers as a tool to calculate behaviors of many-electrons or three body problem using realistic atomic model with actually moving electrons.

So we had No choice but to adopt fantasy quantum mechanics which discarded real electron and wave picture and this biggest mistake made by "scientists" 100 years ago led to today's fictional physics and cosmology.

Gave up real atomic picture due to lack of modern computer in 1920s.
→ quantum mechanical unphysical electron cloud model where an electron can exist everywhere due to fictional parallel worlds.

→ This unphysical quantum electron cloud cannot explain actual molecular bonds or forces → rely on unreal quasiparticle and one pseudo-electron DFT model to describe all materials.

→ the current so-called "science" is useless because physicists continue using this fictitious one-electron DFT model as the only calculation tool in vain, forever. ← now.

To treat actual many-electron materials as they are in a realistic way, we have to replace the current false quantum mechanics and DFT atomic model which fail to explain actual multi-particle phenomena by realistic atomic model before unphysical Schrödinger equation.

This replacement of today's pseudo-"science" by real one is the only solution to deadly viruses, avoiding our economy being destroyed and saving students from fake science taught in the current authoritarian academia which thinks only about protecting their old vested rights, sacrificing our lives.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Uncertainty principle is nonsense.

[ Heisenberg uncertainty principle prevents us from knowing detailed electron's state inside atoms forever. ]

(U-1)  ↓ Quantum parallel worlds =  

COVID-19 virus is still running rampant, taking many lives.

The current so-called "science" can do nothing except imposing draconian quarantine, forcing many restaurants, shops to close, sacrificing economy.  ← very primitive, "unscientific" measure.

We are completely helpless before this deadly invisible enemy.  Why ?

We already have the technology of manipulating a single atom which is far smaller than a virus. Then, why cannot we deal with a bigger virus which seems far easier to deal with than a smaller atom ?

All living things are made of atoms with electrons and nuclei.
All biological activities are governed by atomic interactions.

Viruses can sneak into human bodies cleverly using very sophisticated atomic interaction, which was created by Nature on a long road of evolution.

Our human bodies and brains to think more creatively than a virus and invent something useful are also given by Mother Nature through evolution.

Mother Nature could create sophisticated nano-machine = living organisms, viruses and our immune system removing viruses.  Why cannot humans do the same thing as Mother Nature ?

The current only atomic theory is uncanny "quantum mechanics".

We picked and use the wrong atomic model which is too unrealistic and useless to apply in developing effective drugs ?

Atomic theory is still old quantum mechanics which uses mythical Heisenberg uncertainty principle that is immanent in unphysical Schrödinger equation, which still nobody understands even after 100 years have passed since its foundation.

Quantum mechanics dismissed realistic electron picture (= no more real moving electron ), and instead, adopted unphysical wavefunction model where even a single electron must always spread all over space as a fuzzy electron cloud.

This vague electron cloud model in quantum mechanics is a hotbed of many fictions such as parallel worlds ( this p.5 ), an illusory cat which can be dead and alive at once.

In this quantum mechanical cloud model, we are Not allowed to know the precise position of an electron due to tyrannical rule = uncertainty principle.  The old atomic theory claims all we can know is vague "probability" of finding an electron somewhere.

This "uncertainty principle" tells us nothing about the detailed bahavior of electrons inside atoms, hence, it prevents us from utilizing precise atomic interaction for effective drug development, forever.

The most serious problem rooted in quantum mechanics is whether an electron is a particle or wave is uncertain, different from the more realistic atomic model having separated distinct particle and wave pictures.

Quantum mechanics also treats an electron as "de Broglie wave", which was confirmed in many experiments.

An electron is also a "moving charged particle" controlled by electromagnetic fields, which particle picture of an electron is also an established fact confirmed in many experiments.

Then, an electron is a particle or a wave ?  ← It's impossible that an electron or other particles can be both a particle and a wave simultaneously in this real world !

But quantum mechanics mixes the concepts of particle and wave, though a partilce and a wave have completely different shape and property.

They jumbled up "particle" and "wave" as one unphysical chimera called wavefunction where the electron's precise figure, position, momentum are obscured in "uncertain clouds" forever.

This "mixed" particle and wave electron model makes quantum mechanics unrealistic and useless in any applied science or medicine, as I'll explain here.

Electron's de Broglie wavelength λ is inversely proportional to electron's momentum p (= or kinetic energy ).

So as de Broglie wavelength λ is shorter and sharper, the electron's momentum p ( and kinetic energy ) becomes bigger.

Quantum mechanics uses this de Broglie wave not only as an indicator of electron's momentum ( or kinetic energy ) but also as "probability" amplitude of finding an electron at the wave location (= higher wave amplitude = higher probability of finding an electron in that place ).

So when an electron really exists in a certain place at some time, its de Broglie wave amplitude which allegedly expresses the probability of finding an electron in that place must be very sharper and narrower (= de Broglie wavelength is shorter → electron's kinetic energy increases unrealistically ) in only the place of the electron instantly.

If an electron is a particle which can exist at some definite position at some particular time, its de Broglie wave ( or quantum wavefunction ) must be extremely sharper and narrower like delta function which wavelength is almost zero (= electron's probability is not zero only ) at the electron's position, which means the electron's momentum and kinetic energy expressed by very narrow de Broglie wave become extremely large = infinite !  ← Impossible.

But in actual atoms, electron's kinetic energy cannot be so large, because too large kinetic energy means too large total energy, which disagrees with the actual very low-energy (= hence, stable ) ground-state electron of the atom.

For example, in hydrogen atom, electron's de Broglie wavelength is Not so short or narrow (= hydrogen Schrödinger wave function, which has the same kinetic energy as de Broglie wave and allegedly represents probability of an electron, is as long as the whole atomic length ), which means the actual atomic electron's kinetic energy expressed by broad de Broglie wavelength is Not so large = less than some moderate value.

The electron's de Broglie wavelength which is as long as the entire atomic length in the actual atoms means the electron's probability wavefunction also spreads over the entire atom and the electron's position inside an atom, which is expressed by broad wave function, is blurred and uncertain.

On the other hand, in the realistic atomic model,  an electron (= moving "particle" ) is separated from its de Broglie "wave" generated around the moving electron particle (= so, this realistic de Broglie wave has Nothing to do with electron "probability" which was artificially introduced by quantum mechanics ).

In this real atomic model separating an electron "particle" from de Broglie "wave", an electron can exist at a certain position keeping down the electron's kinetic energy by keeping moderately broad de Broglie wavelength (= we don't need to use unrealistically narrow and sharp de Broglie wave to localize an electron only in some position, because this realistic de Broglie wave has nothing to do with "probability" of finding an electron ).

Unscientific Heisenberg uncertainty principle expressed as quantum mechanical "probability" wavefunction mixing an electron particle and wave as chimera is problematic and does Not work in molecular bonds,  which proves quantum mechanics is wrong.

Actual molecular bonds are formed when negative electrons are attracted to positive nuclei, avoiding other negative electrons, which hence decreases Coulomb potential energy and total energy.  ← The lowest-energy (= most stable ) atomic state is the ground state.

This "attractive" Coulomb (= lower ) potential energy between electrons and nuclei is the origin of any stable atomic and molecular bonds.  But quantum mechanical "probability" wavefunction mixing an particle and wave as chimera cannot generate this attractive Coulomb force or real potential energy.

Quantum mechanical electron must always spread all over the space as electron cloud, so cannot avoid other electrons, despite repulsive force between negatively charged electrons.  ← at this point, No reality.

So it's impossible for quantum mechanical electron clouds to form molecular bonds, because the spreading electron clouds cannot avoid each other (= hence, lowering Coulomb potential energy is impossible in quantum mechanical molecule ), though there is Coulomb repulsion between electrons in actual molecules.

If quantum electron probability wavefunction can be localized only at some point instead of "spreading", like a realistic classical electron, the quantum electrons can avoid each other, too, but this is impossible.

The localized electron (= exists at a certain point ) means the quantum probability wavefunction must be extremely sharper and narrower only at the point of an electron, which increases the electron's kinetic energy unrealistically, hence lowering total energy to form molecular bond is impossible in quantum mechanics.

So quantum mechanics has to rely on some "cheating" where they illegitimately decrease the electron kinetic energy, violating total energy conservation.

Schrödinger equation cannot be solved in any multi-electron atoms, so they just choose any arbitrary trial wavefuncton as fake solution with adjustable parameters.

These quantum mechanical Fake solutions do Not need to satisfy total energy conservation (= electron's kinetic energy + Coulomb potential energy = total energy must be conserved in any real molecules ), which illegitimate "violation of energy conservation law" is exploited to generate false molecular bond energy in quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanical electron "probability" wavefunction where each electron is spreading all over space as vague cloud is unable to express actual Coulomb attraction which is the origin of any real molecular bonds.

In this quantum mechanical cheating method of lowering (fake) total energy of molecules by violating energy conservation (= lowering kinetic energy without increasing potential energy ), it's impossible to know real Coulomb or other forces between electrons.

This quantum mechanical calculation method is meaninglessly time-consuming only to get fake total energy by integrating artificially chosen fake wavefunction.

So quantum mechanics dismissed realistic atomic model also in actual materials and started to treat the whole solid or crystal as one fake quasi-electron with fake (= effective ) mass which can even be negative.  ← Impossible !

In larger solids and crystals, they replaced useless and meaninglessly time-consuming Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms by one fake electron model ( this p.3 ) called density functional theory (= DFT or Kohn-Sham theory ).

This bogus one-electron approximation = DFT is most widely used in quantum mechanics now to describe many-electron molecules and solids.  But of course, it is impossible to describe actual multi-electron molecules or solids by one-electron pseudo-DFT model, therefore, it always fails ( this p.17 ).

Furthermore, quantum mechanics has to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge to describe physical phenomena of all materials such as semiconductor, superconductor, solar cell, even in interpretation of microscopic and biological picture.  ← Nonsense.

This unrealistic and useless quantum mechanics originates in 1920s when physicists had No modern computers to calculate three-body problem = multi-electron atoms using realistic electrons which are actually moving and avoiding each other dynamically, causing real de Broglie waves.

Gave up real atomic picture due to lack of modern computer in 1920s → quantum mechanical unphysical electron cloud model was introduced, which cannot determine a particle or wave → an electron can exist everywhere due to fictional uncertainty principle and parallel worlds. → rely on unreal quasiparticle model to describe all materials → the current science is useless.  ← now.

These fictional quantum mechanics is useless except for selling books which is just "literature" unrelated to actual physical phenomena, and they just stick to old history with No progress for 100 years, which just hampers our science progress.

Academia and global corporations control WHO to spread wrong advice "don't wear masks" so that more people are infected by viruses, which brings more profits to those "globalists" by forcing governments to conduct more expensive "tests" and dreamlike vaccine development in the name of "science" and so-called "experts", controlling even Greta and Nobel prize.

Parallel-world quantum computer with fictional particle is also fake science made up by academia and corporation to steal taxpayers' money in the name of "science", like fishy global warming while record cold temperature sweeping the world.

Hillary Clinton's "It Takes A Village ( to send a student to university )" is illusion, too.  The current old-fashioned school system is harmful to students' future by teaching fake " science", and now the school is just a hotbed of spreading life-threatening viruses.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Einstein is the 'biggest obstacle' to science.

[ Einstein and quantum mechanics are 'harmful' to tackling viruses. ]

(E-1)  ↓ Fantasy extra-dimensions =   = Science ?

Our science technology is helpless before the deadly viruses.

The current academia is harmful rather than beneficial by confining students in old-fashioned school system = a hotbed of viruses, teaching fake science which not only ruins students' future but also exacerbates pandemic by spreading false advice in the name of "science".

Today's "science" is based on two old theories = quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity, which have Not changed for 100 years despite their uselessness.

Einstein special relativity, which was invented in 1905, believes physically paradoxical worlds where moving clock runs slower depending on an observer's motion which causes serious paradox.

The only practical use of Einstein relativity is said to be controversial GPS time correction, which is too small to confirm the time error origin.

In fact, GPS does Not use Einstein, its time error must be constantly corrected by ground stations irrelevant to Einstein theory, due to many other factors such as atmospheric pressure.

If we try to apply this fantasy Einstein relativity to the GPS time, it causes serious twin time-dilation paradox where it's impossible to determine which moving GPS satellite time runs slower, because seen by one satellite, another satellite is always moving (= hence, slower time ), and vice versa.

Atomic energy does Not need Einstein's strange theory of mc2.
In fact, Einstein mc2 is just a copy of classical Maxwell electromagnetic theory.

It means all these so-called Einstein relativistic effects can be replaced by other more realistic theory or factors avoiding fatal paradoxes rooted in Einstein relativity.

Quantum mechanics introduced in 1926 to allegedly explain atomic behavior is filled with fictional concepts such as parallel worlds, a dead and alive cat which basic mechanism Nobody understands, because it's fiction.

Quantum mechanics is obviously useless for curing diseases, but physicists have refused to change that old obsolete science till now to protect their academic status and vested rights like old church did to Galileo.

Boring cliche "quantum mechanics is the most successful theory ?" is just fake news to brainwash gullible laypersons.

Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics was united into another unrealistic theory called QED or quantum field theory which needs unreal virtual particles with imaginary mass to explain force carriers ( this p.3 ), after Einstein rejected "real medium" in space.

If we admitted the existence of real "medium" from the beginning, we would Not have made up artificial dark matter, unreal virtual particles and parallel worlds to explain various physical phenomena such as galaxy rotation, forces and two-slit experiments.

Quantum field theory is purely nonphysical math with No ability to describe actual physical phenomena using real objects, hence, lacking reality.

They describe each electron and photon particle only as nonphysical math symbols (= each particle = a, b, c .. this p.14 ) with No physical shape or color.

QED calculation method is also nonphysical artificial trick called renormalization using fictional tools = virtual particles and infinite bare charge ( this p.4 ), which absurd, ghost-like concepts are impossible to detect.

This old QED quantum theory is useless for our daily life (= so, almost nobody knows this useless QED except a very small number of old physicists which academic job has nothing to do with real world ), and even founders criticized it as hocus-pocus.

When we touch some object, the contact force tells us it feels solid.  The current quantum theory says this contact force is caused by "Pauli exclusion principle" which repulsive force keeps molecules from colliding with each other.

But fantasy quantum physics claims this contact force (= allegedly caused by Pauli principle ) is Not a real force.  No physical meaning or interpretation is given to explain this Pauli exclusion force ( this p.6, this p.3, this p.10 ) which lacks even force carrier.  ← nonsense, ghost-like concept, again.

Quantum field theory combining Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics can only describe each electron as a nonphysical math symbol ( a electron = a, b, c .. ) with No tangible figure, which is physically meaningless, as I said.

They claim this strange Pauli principle is caused by completely unphysical concept called anti-commutation where swapping two electrons (= math symbols ) flips the sign from positive to negative ( this p.2, this p.3 ).

Quantum field theory can neither give more detailed mechanism of this Pauli repulsion nor admit it as a real force.  ← Nonsense.

This Einstein quantum field theory advanced to standard model in high energy physics which just wastes money in illusory fractional-charge quarks (= undetectable ), God particle Higgs (= undetectable, too ), which are said to appear only instantly inside garbage data of colliders, though they don't really exist.

It's impossible to isolate these illusory particles such as quarks, Higgs, W bosons for confirmation = they are too unstable to detect directly, hence useless.  All reactions related to these imaginary particles are said to require unreal virtual particles.

So the current high energy physics based on Einstein and quantum mechanics is unrealistic, meaningless, and has nothing to do with our real world.

All the quantum field theory can do is describe each particle such as quark and Higgs as nonphysical math symbol with No detailed figure ( this p.11 ), which cannot be available for any practical use.

We cannot know the physical shape, size or property of each particle in the present unphysical theory, so utilizing it in applied science such as medicine or drug development is much more impossible.

Under this nonphysical quantum field theory, physicists have to rely on unreal quasipaticle model also in condensed-matter, solid physics such as semiconductor, superconductor, graphene, tunnel and solar cell.

Condensed matter physics, which should explain actual physical phenomena just around us, has to rely on fictitious quasiparticles.  ← How miserable the current "science" theory is !

In this quasiparticle model, physicists just artificially adjust the quasiparticle's fake mass and charge to express various different physical phenomena, and the quasiparticle has No physical figure except nonphysical abstract math symbols ( this p.4 ), like other fictional particles expressed by quantum mechanics and Einstein.

Einstein general relativity introduced in 1915 is fantasy, which has been used only to describe fictional objects such as black hole, wormhole, BigBang, gravitational wave all of which are useless, too far away to confirm, and they have nothing to do with our daily life.

So these research on Einstein physics is just a waste of time and taxpayers' money.

Unified theory combining unrealistic quantum mechanics and Einstein general relativity is unphysical 10-dimensional string theory, a.k.a. Einstein dream or theory of everything.

How sad it is to accept the fact that the current only unified theory combining Einstein and quantum mechanics has to rely on imaginary extra-dimension !  ← This is the strong evidence that the current basic science is false and unrealistic.

So today's so-called "science", which basic principle is just fiction, is the main reason why we cannot understand molecular behavior in a realistic way or develop effective cure for diseases forever, despite longtime research.

Warmer temperature clearly slows the spread of deadly coronaviruses.  But the current academia based on fake science does Not want to accept even this obvious fact, and instead, still forces governments to aim at colder weather using Greta as icon, though cold temperature will clearly increase the death toll of viruses.  ← "Scientists" want more people to die ?

Contrary to so-called "scientist's" prediction, the world is facing record cold temperature.  Where has global warming gone ?

Not viruses or global warming,  but the "fake science" is our true enemy.

Unless we deny the current so-called (fake) "science", we can never develop real technology to eradicate this deadliest virus of the century.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

"Tests" cannot prevent Coronavirus.

[ All test kits and vaccine just use "natural" animals, Not created by human "technology". ]

(C-1)  ↓ Useless quantum physics cannot cure  

Recently, we often hear the "myth" that increasing "tests" may reduce the mortality rate for Coronavirus.

But it's impossible to find all asymptomatic virus carriers, hence, we cannot prevent the spread of virus by conducting only "tests".

Actually, many countries such as Germany seem to have already reached the limits of test capacity.

Much cheaper and easier way to prevent virues than tests is wearing face mask.

But many "experts" and "scientists" kept saying contradictory things, advising people Not to wear masks.  Masks are clearly the most efficient way to prevent us from infection and to save lives.

Only after even ordinary people noticed masks are effective, academia finally admitted it, which is "too late" after many people across the world have already been infected and lost their lives.

Why has academia needed to hide the true effectiveness of masks until many people obviously fell victim to viruses without them ?

If many people are discouraged from wearing masks ( in the name of science ), and fell sick, some global corporations and academia can make "large profits" by conducting more "tests" and getting more research funds for developing "dreamlike" drugs and vaccine.

The advice that healthy people don't need to wear mask ( only sick patients should wear masks to prevent spreading virues ) is self-contradictory like a dead and alive cat in quantum mechanics.

Because the material used in masks is Not "one-way".
If a mask can block sick people from spreading their virues, it can also prevent healthy people from being infected in "both" directions.  ← This explanation is physically "more consistent".

The fact that obeying "experts" led to increasing more viral victims shows it is very dangerous to blindly believe so-called "experts" just because they are "scientists" whom Greta repeatedly encourages us to listen to.

"Scientists" often treat global warming as (false) "existential threat", though warmer temperature clearly reduces the victims of this deadly virus.

Actually, unusually cold weather is sweeping the world against so-called "scientists" prediction of global warming.  ← The current mainstream "science" is fake ?

Even now we cannot stop coronavirus-infected patients from dying.  It means No effective drugs are found so far, and our current science technology is helpless before this deadly coronavirus.

So, for now, only primitive quarantine and cheap masks can slow the spread of viruses.  Neither expensive tests nor ventilators, from which corporations try to make more profits, can prevent people from being infected.

To learn useless "science", wasting time and money in the current outdated schools which is the most "dangerous place" for spreading virues, is meaningless.  Reopening schools just to learn "fake science" is really worth risking many lives of students and their parents ?

Technology used in the current "tests" for COVID-19 virus is also outdated with No progress for decades due to useless basic science = quantum mechanics.

Now, the only reliable test for detecting coronavirus infection is polymerase chain reaction (= PCR ) which basic technology has Not changed or progressed since its first discovery in 1970s.

The point is our human technology based on quantum physics can do nothing to enable this PCR test.

RNA of coronavirus needs to be changed into DNA for PCR test by enzymes called reverse transcriptase which was obtained only from natural retrovirus.  ← Retrovirus was created by Mother Nature a long time ago.

Our original human technology cannot create this enzymes or change RNA into DNA.  ← Our imitation of natural microorganisms is impossible.  All we can do is rely on natural nanomachine called "enzymes" created by Mother Nature in a long road of evolution.

Then, they amplify the target virus DNA by PCR using bacterial enzymes called polymerases which was first found in Yellowstone Park.

Our current technology itself cannot design or create this natural nanomachine called enzyme which is needed to amplify DNA by PCR method.  All we can do is find some miracle enzymes which seem to be available for tests from natural organisms instead of creating it.

People who were once infected with coronavirus may acquire "immunity" because our immune cells have the ability to produce antibody agaist virus inside our bodies after infection.

The media starts to say "People with antibody against virus may be safe and released from draconian quarantine, so all of us should take antibody tests !"

But so far, None of these tests could accurately detect antibodies against COVID-19.  There are too many "false positive" or "false negative" cases in antibody detection tests.

There is No guarantee that people with antibodies won't get this virus again, because the virus may mutate frequently.  And how long this antibody lasts inside body is still unclear.

How can they detect the antibody against coronavirus ?
They often use antibody tests based on immunoassay called "ELISA".

In this immunoassay tests, they use the second antibody which may attach to and detect the primary antibody (= which is the target antibody produced by infected body ) against virus.

This second antibody is bound to special fluorescent enzyme which can be easily seen.  How is this second antibody against the target primary antibody created ?

The current science relies on old-fashioned technology like vaccine where researchers just inject and immunize animals with target proteins (= target antibody or virus envelope ), then collect the second antibodies produced by natural immune cells inside animals' bodies.

Again, our human technology can do nothing about creating these antibodies.  All we can do is let animal's natural immune system produce random antibodies, and pray to God, leaving effectiveness of produced antibodies to chance.

This random and uncertain process of producing antibodies (= because we cannot produce antibody which production completely depends on "natural immune cells" ) is the reason why reliable antibody test is difficult to achieve.

Our inability to control atoms or proteins for developing effective drugs is due to fictional quantum mechanics which is the current only atomic theory, sadly.

Quantum mechanics and its so-called "unified theory" with Einstein relativity are based on fantasy parallel worlds, extra-dimensions, imaginary time-machine, unreal quasiparticles and superluminal spin.

The current useless science urged scientists to give up practical use of science, and instead, focus only on selling "sci-fi books", sticking to old historic folks, repeatedly talking about "hackneyed episodes" forever, meaninglessly.  ← Science stops progressing, stuck in old obsolete science which has No contribution to our daily lives.

Since our basic science went into the wrong direction 100 years ago, the atomic theory has Not progressed and we have been unable to utilize the fictional quantum mechanics in medicine.

We need to replace the current useless physics based on fictional concepts by more practical realistic atomic theory which can be used as a tool to move forward to curing deadly diseases, viruses, and save our lives and economy as soon as possible.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Quantum mechanical molecule is unreal.

[ Unreal atomic behavior allows virus to spread indefinitely. ]

(P-1)  ↓ Quantum parallel worlds in   principle ?

Many countries are rushing to develop 'dreamlike' vaccine against deadly COVID-19, coronavirus.

But vaccine is very old technique with more than a 200 year history.  It means vaccine developers did Not consider the "underlying molecular mechanism" of how vaccine expels viruses  at all.

All they can do is inject some virus antigen into us, and pray to God that our inborn immune cells may produce antibodies against viruses, leaving it to chance.

We cannot rely on this "uncertain" and unpredictable nature of vaccination, so the 'draconian quarantine' sacrificing our economy is the only effective measure for now to slow the spread of viruses now.

I'm surprised WHO still refuses to recommend wearing face mask.
Masks are clearly effective not only for sick patients but also for healthy people to avoid being infected by viruses.

I have the impression that even a "simple paper mask" is more effective than wearing no mask against viruses.  But even here in Japan, people suffer from a shortage of masks which I often bought for pollen allergy every year.

So I hope governments and Elon will offer more 'mask' before ventilators.

This is a typical example showing it is dangerous to blindly believe so-called "experts", "scientists" and their fake science which Greta repeatedly touts.

The current science turned into just a "money-making tool" by corporations colluding with academia which tend to put their profits before public interests.

There may be some "global industrial organizations" which don't want people to wear face mask to reduce viral infection, because they want to make more profit by increasing patients of virus.

Warm temperature clearly reduces the death toll of this coronavirus.  But "scientists" snub this fact, and try to treat global warming as our false life-threatening enemy.  ← The opposite to the current "science" is true ?

Actually, the world is being gripped by unusually cold weather against so-called "experts" prediction of global warming.

Now, school is the most "dangerous place" for spreading viruses, because it's impossible for students to keep social distancing by wearing masks in schools.

In fact, since before this coronavirus pandemic, we haven't needed to waste time and money in going to the current outdated universities which just force fake science on us to obstruct development of true science, hence, opening schools is more harmful to our economy and young students' future.

To fight against 'invisible enemy' = viruses, we need to know the precise shape and property of this enemy.

But at the atomic level, the current physics called quantum mechanics says only fantasy things such as an electron being everywhere using parallel worlds inside nonphysical fuzzy wave function that tells us nothing about what physical shape each atom has.

Then, there is No way for us to know the precise shape of an atom ?  Everything on the earth is just an illusion ?

The current mainstream physics says when we touch a thing, an abstract math concept called "Pauli exclusion principle" tells us its shape and its texture.

What the hell is this Pauli exclusion principle ?
Is this a tangible physical "thing" or just an imaginary concept ?

When we touch a thing, we feel "contact force".
Of course, this contact force is a real force that we actually feel and use in our daily life.

But fantasy quantum physics claims this contact force (= allegedly caused by Pauli principle ) is Not a real force.  No physical meaning or interpretation is given to explain this Pauli exclusion force ( this p.6, this p.3, this p.10 ) which lacks even force carrier.  ← nonsense, ghost-like concept

So the current physics has No ability to give actual physical shape or force to each thing at the atomic level, which keeps a viral molecule "invisible" and prevents us from developing effective drugs against those invisible enemy.

By the way, how does wacky quantum mechanics describe this "ghost-like Pauli exclusion principle" which has Not been given any physical meaning for 100 years ?

In quantum mechanics, each electron is Not a moving point-lile particle with its definite position and velocity, but a vague electron cloud which must always spread all over the space where even a single electron can exist everywhere at once  like a ghost.

Let's think about the case where two hydrogen atoms (= one belongs to a virus envelope and another belongs to an antibody protein ) approach and interact with each other, then forming hydrogen molecule.

Quantum mechanics thinks of each single negative electron as "thinly-enlarged electron cloud" which very low-density charge is too weak to attract another positive nuclues (= which attraction between a negative electron and a positive nucleus should be the origin of molecular bond ).

Quantum mechanics treats only a positive nucleus as a point-like charge and Coulomb repulsion between those two point-like nuclei is far stronger than attraction between a fuzzy electron (= thinly-spreading over all space ) and nucleus.

It means it is impossible for quantum mechanical molecule to form stable molecular bond which should be caused by attraction between negative electrons and positive nuclei overcoming repulsion between nuclei.

Quantum electron's wavefunction (= spreading all over space symmetrically around a nucleus ) is similar to a collection of "spherically-distributed charges around a nucleus" which thinly-stretched electron's negative charge cannot approach another nucleus, no matter how enlarged the electron is.

Hence, quantum mechanical "thinly-spreading" electron cloud model is unable to form molecular bonds which should be caused by a negative electron approaching a positive nucleus lowering Coulomb potential energy between those attracted charges.

On the other hand, if the electron is a realistic moving point-like charge, the electron can approach another nucleus very closely as a dense point-like negative charge, while it is orbiting around its own nucleus, therefore, lowering Coulomb potential energy caused by strong attraction between a negative dense electron charge and a positive dense nucleus (= because both are point-like charges ) to form strong molecular bond is possible.

For the unrealistically spreading quantum electron cloud to form a molecular bond which is as strong as the actual molecule, it has to rely on "cheating".

Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics cannot be solved in multi-electron atoms or molecule.

As a simple approximate (= fake ) solution for hydrogen molecule (= H2 ), they often artificially choose two simple hydrogen atoms ( H2 molecule = 2 × H atoms ? )

Inside each hydrogen atomic wavefunction of this fake H2 molecule, total energy (= sum of electron's kinetic and Coulomb potential energy ) is supposed to be conserved or constant  independently of another hydrogen atom.

Suppose an negative electron-1 belongs (= is closer ) to a positive hydrogen nucleus-1, and a electron-2 belongs to a hydrogen nucleus-2 in this H2 molecule.

To satisfy total energy conservation, when an electron-1 goes farther away from its own positive nucleus-1, its potential energy becomes higher, therefore, the electron's kinetic energy must be lower to conserve total energy (= higher potential + lower kinetic energies = total energy is conserved or constant ).

But H2 molecule contains two positive nuclei.  So, even if the electron-1 goes farther away from its own positive nucleus-1, it can approach another positive nucleus-2 along its thinly-spreading wavefunction which can seemingly lower Coulomb potential energy between the electron-1 and nucleus-2, while the electron-1 kinetic energy keeps decreasing.

This does Not satisfy total energy conservation law any longer.

This lower potential energy ( between electron-1 and nucleus-2 ) + lower electron-1 kinetic energy = lower total energy (= the total energy can Not keep constant ) means the total energy is Not conserved in quantum fake H2 molecule consisting of two approximate hydrogen atomic wavefunctions.

This "cheating method" of illegitimately lowering kinetic energy violating total energy conservation law is the origin of quantum mechanical unreal molecular bond.

Only this "cheating" is Not enough to generate strong molecular bond  So quantum mechanics has to rely on another cheating = a nonphysical, artificial trick called "overlap (= exchange ) integral".

This "exchange integral" allegedly expressing Pauli principle is a purely nonphysical concept, hence it is impossible to describe "Pauli principle exchange integral" using real things.

For example, we think about Pauli exclusion force (= though, force cannot be calculated in quantum mechanics ) between an electron-1 of an antibody's hydrogen and an electron-2 of a virus's hydrogen (= Pauli repulsion is necessary to keep two molecules from colliding ).

Surprisingly, according to this quantum nonphysical Pauli principle, the electron-1 must exist simultaneously both in two different places (= here, antibody and virus hydrogens ) like an uncanny dead and alive ghost cat.

So this quantum unrealistic H2 molecule formed between antibody and virus hydrogen atoms must include two strange wavefunctions: one is an electron-1 existing inside an antibody hydrogen wavefunction (= φa (r1) ) and another is an electron-1 existing inside a virus hydrogen wavefunction (= φb(r1 ) ).  ← A single electron-1 can exist in two different places (= antibody and virus ) at once like a ghost !

In the same way, it must also include another ghost-like electron-2 which can exist simultaneously both inside antibody hydrogen wavefunction (= φa (r2) ) and inside virus hydrogen wavefunction (= φb(r2 ) ).  ← so a single electron-2 also exists in two different places (= antibody and virus ) at once !

Furthermore, they fabricated a nonphysical artificial rule called "antisymmetic wavefunction" as Pauli exclusion principle.

In unsolvable Schrödinger equation of multi-electron molecules, all physicists can do is choose fake approximate solutions and integrate it (= instead of solving it ) to get fake energy ( this p.3 ).

In the process of this calculation, strange overlap (= exchange ) integral appears ( this p.14 ), and this nonphysical exchange integral is used to artificially enhance illegetimately-lowered kinetic energy by aggravating violation of energy conservation law to generate fake molecular bond energy.

When this illegitimate trick of exchange integral seemingly lowers total energy, it is interpreted as (fake) molecular bond energy, and when the sign is changed and this exchange integral is used to seemingly heighten total energy in the opposite direction, it is artificially interpreted as Pauli exclusion energy.

In these both cases of quantum molecular bond and Pauli exclusion energies, illegetimate violation of total energy conservation is necessary as the driving force to generate those fake molecular energies (= this fake energy by quantum mechanical cheating cannot be used to derive actual force, so useless ).

This is a nonphysical rule to artificially explain Pauli principle by force, so it lacks physical reality, therefore, it is impossible to describe this quantum Pauli principle using real objects in this world.

And we prove this Pauli exclusion principle based on unreal spin is self-contradictory, so wrong.

We cannot utilize real physical objects or forces in molecular interaction between actual antibody and virus proteins, as long as we rely on nonphysical quantum Pauli principle , which is the reason why quantum mechanics is useless in all applied science such as medicine forever.

This nonphysical quantum physics made physicists give up using real particles, instead, they started to use unreal quasipaticle model to describe all physical phenomena such as semiconductor, superconductor, graphene, tunnel and solar cell.

This is why even advocators of old-fashioned vaccination, like Microsoft, still rely on illusory quasiparticle model each time they think about atomic interaction which cannot contribute to developing effective drugs based on "real atomic mechanism".

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Quantum parallel worlds can't eradicate virus.

[ Coronavirus is "invisible" before useless physics. ]

(P-1)  ↓ Useless quantum mechanical  

Tokyo Olympics have been postponed.  It's inevitable amid increasing risk of spreading viruses by Olympics while the entire world is working hard to contain them.

Many restaurants, hotels, sports and gatherting events are forced to be closed by this deadly virus.  The sudden stop in social activity through quarantine may collapse our economy.

The reason for us to stop economic activity is this virus is an "invisible" enemy, hence unpredictable and very hard to catch and remove.  It may be dangerous to continue our usual daily life.

The current 'ancient-style' school system which may ruin students' future by their fake science could be a hotbed of viral infection.

Japan closed schools earlier than other countries, which contributed to slowing the spread of virues.  But the recent move to reopen schools may increase the chance of pandemic, I'm afraid.

The evidence shows warmer temperature clearly slows Coronavirus and reduces the death toll.  But the current mainstream "science" ignores this fact and still urged governments to waste more taxpayers' money in tackling dubious global warming amid this real 'existential threat' = viral pandemic.

Ironically, the world is facing unusually cold weather throughout the year.  ← Is today's mainstream "science" really trustworthy ?

Why do we need to be so terrified by this virus ?
Because this virus is supposed to be 'invisible' according to the current 'science' and pundits.

To protect our lives from "invisible" enemy, large-scale quarantine sacrificing business activity and convenience of daily living seems to be the only safe method.

The problem is this Coronavirus is really a "invisible enemy" ?
Is it possible the current "fake science" makes originally "visible enemy" appear as if "invisible" ?

If this Coronavirus is "visible", there is No need to be so frightened.  Because it is easier to find and eradicate "visible pathogen" like washing off the dirt.

What's the smallest thing our latest technology can perceive as "visible" ?  The size of a virus is about 100 nm ( 1nm = 10-9 meter ).

The size of a single atom is about 0.1 nm, which is far smaller than a virus.

Today's human technology already can recognize and even manipulate each single atom using atomic force microscope with high resolution of 0.01 nm (= 10 pm, this p.2 ).

Bigger objects can be more easily detected and manipulated.  So the current human technology should be able to manipulate and eliminate a much-bigger virus from our body as a distinctly "visible" enemy.

A very small and allegedly-invisible enemy, virus and its highly sophisticated mechanism of cleverly infecting humans were invented by Mother Nature which is obviously "less intellectual" and less dexterous than humans.

Then, why are humans helpless before deadly viruses ?

Humans have excellent "ability" to think and invent machines, and should be able to construct more sohisticated instruments using more skillful fingers than "inanimate Mother Nature" which cannot think or even move voluntarily.

Why cannot humans tame viruses which "less intellectual" Mother Nature created ?  "Intellectual human" is just illusion ?  Or what we believe as "science" now is illusion ?  We are brainwashed by someone ?

The main problem is our current science never admits atoms, molecules ( and viruses ) to be real tangible objects.

As long as we (= our science ) refuse to consider the virus as a "real object", the virus remains an invisible ghost-lile enemy, and catching and removing "ghost viruses" are an unattainable dream

For the past 100 years, wacky quantum mechanics has dominated the physics world as our only atomic theory which believes each thing can exist in many places at once using fantasy parallel worlds.

According to this quantum physics, a cat can be dead and alive at the same time inside a box and even rewrite the past with supernatural power.

Physicists all over the world are spending their great deal of time in research on the current only "theory of everything" based on "invisible" string of extremely small size = Planck length (= 10-35m = 10-26 nm ) which is far, far smaller than a virus or an atom.

The fact that researchers can already afford to focus on the far smaller imaginary string than a virus as "theory of everything" and put all their energies into catching ghost-like extra-dimensions means we have already been able to control far bigger viruses easily since long time ago ?

Unfortunately, this far bigger virus is still an invisible formidable enemy.

Since Einstein brushed off "real medium" in space as "invisible" ghost, Physicists have been wasting their time in pursuing "fictional virtual particles" with imaginary nonphysical mass as "actual force carriers" ( this p.3 ).  ← Nonsense.

Nobel physicists claim their technology can detect and "see" very tiny change which is reportedly smaller than one-thousandth the proton radius (= 10-9 nm ) caused by fishy gravitational wave.

If the current technology can really catch such a tiny change far smaller than a proton, why cannot scientists detect or remove viruses which are said to be far bigger than elusive gravitational wave or extradimensional string ?

LIGO is based on unrealistic technology, saying extremely tiny change of gravitational wave (= 10-18 m ) can be detected using interference of lights with the wavelength (= 10-6 m ) which is far longer than gravitational wave change.   ← Impossible !

Actually, this gravitational wave is just an unphysical "pseudo-tensor" and useless for our daily life forever, except for getting prestigious prize.

A bigger virus remains "invisible", while the smaller atom is visible by the current technology of microscopy, and unrealistically smaller gravitational wave and extradimensional strings are said to be "visible".  ← How contradictory our science is !

After measuring atomic force by microscope, we have to explain those forces such as Coulomb force using the model based on some "real objects" to apply the atomic model to bigger molecules or proteins.

We have already known the number of valence electrons around each nucleus.  So only thing left to do is distribute those electrons as symmetrically as possible around a nucleus, considering Coulomb repulsion between electrons.

The number of valence electrons is less than eight, Not so large.  Therefore distributing electrons around each nucleus and estimating Coulomb forces among atoms should be easy.

Even this simple task is impossible for quantum mechanics which considers each electron Not as a real particle but as a vague "probability" cloud spreading all over space.

Because its nonphysical wavefunction, which allegedly expresses an electron (= though in an unknown place ) cannot distinguish a wave and a particle.

So these quantum mechanical electron expressed as a vaguely spreading wavefunction cannot avoid each other to lower total energy, though lowering total energy is necessary to form stable molecular bonds.

If we try to express each electron as a clear particle, quantum "probability" electron wavefunction must be unrealistically higher and sharper only in the electron's position (= electron probability needs to be localized only in the electron's position ), which increases the electron's kinetic energy and fails to decrease the total energy (= hence, molecular bonds cannot be formed in quantum mechanics ).

For quantum spreading wavefunction to form stable molecular bond, it needs to rely on "cheating" where electron's kinetic energy is reduced illegitimately by violating energy conservation law, which fake atomic energy is unable to describe real atomic force.

Time-consuming Schrödinger equation just gives fake energy based on illegitimate "cheating", and cannot calculate atomic force, which is a fatal flaw of quantum mechanics.

Pauli repulsion is another important strong force besides Coulomb force which can be actually measured.

But quantum mechanics cannot treat this Pauli exclusion repulsive force as real force.  No physical interpretation is given to this Pauli repulsion so far ( this p.6, this p.3, this p.10 ).  ← unbelievable.

They claim only "nonphysical exchange energy" (= cannot be explained by real things ) can be calculated (= force cannot be calculated ) using artificially introduced method of antisymmetric wavefunction which I proved wrong.

So as long as we rely on the current only atomic theory = quantum mechanics, we are unable to use realistic electrons as tool, and unable to calculate real atomic force, even if our technology can precisely measure the force.

We have technology of precisely measuring forces of the smallest atom, but No theory or model to explain it, which contradiction is the reason our basic science stalls.

This is why biologists and medical researchers are unable to use ghost-like quantum mechanics to estimate molecular mechanism between viruses and human cells for developing drugs.

This nonphysical quantum physics made physicists give up using real particles, instead, they started to use unreal quasipaticle model to describe all physical phenomena such as semiconductor, superconductor, graphene, tunnel and solar cell.

In this quasiparticle model, physicists just artificially adjust the quasiparticle's fake mass and charge to different situations (= hence unable to predict physical values ), and the quasiparticle has No physical figure except nonphysical abstract math symbols ( this p.4 ).

Physicists stopped using useless and unrealistic quantum Schrödinger equation in multi-electron molecules, and instead, started to treat the whole solid or protein as if it were one fake quasi-electron with fake (= effective ) variable mass which can be even negative.

In a many-electron solid expressed as a fake one-electron band, its quantum calculation tool is also a bogus one-electron approximation ( this p.3 ) called DFT which is uselss, unable to predict any physical values like old Schrödinger equation, because it has to artificially choose pseudo-potential (= functional ) that always fails to explain phenomena ( this p.17 ) and lacks reality ( this p.31 ).

For our current technology, even the smallest single atom is "visible" and measuring its force by microscope is possible, but fantasy quantum mechanics compels us to use unreal quasiparticle ( this p.4 ) and bogus one-electron DFT model ( this p.2 ) to explain many-electron solid and proteins which is unable to be applied to practical medicine.

Without accepting real tools such as real electrons, real force and real waves, originally "visible" objects appear to be "invisible" ghost.  Therefore our science has Not progressed, and stopping deadly viruses from killing people is impossible forever.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Fake science destroys civilization ?

[ Coronavirus could change our culture drastically. ]

(U-1)  ↓ Colossal damage by fake science of   ?

Coronavirus, COVID-19 relentlessly killing people sweeps the world, forced many social gathering, sports events, restaurants, schools to be closed.

If this invisible enemy continues to cripple our daily life, it could bring the world's economic recession and drastic cultural change that we have never seen before.

If the virus is more contagious than we thought, all schools, restaurants and gathering events must be closed the whole year.  Can you endure that ?  What should we do to avoid it ?

Our current "science" technology is helpless before this virus pandemic.  All we can do is old-style quarantine sacrificing our economy.

It's extremely difficult to find solution to this newly-emerged virus.  Even influenza and common cold viruses that have been known for a long time, are still incurable despite longtime research.

This dire situation originates from the fact that we still have No ways to remove pathogenic viruses from our bodies, as seen in HIV viruses endangering patients' lives indefinitely once they invade us.

In old-fashioned vaccination, all researchers can do is inject some viral antigen into humans, blindly believing it will encourage our natural immune cells to exclude viruses effectively.

So in vaccination, we just leave all the important work to our natural immune system (← Not our technology ), praying it will produce antibody attacking virues someday.  Due to this random and uncertain nature of vaccination, it often fails and could cause serious side effects.

The only way left is to randomly and blindly try various substances or old irrelevant drugs on mice, cultured cells or humans, expecting some lucky drug discovery, like ancient people tried various herbs or plants to look for better treatment.

This primitive screening method for drug discovery is why most clinical trials failed miserably.  The fact that we still cannot stop Coronavirus patients from dying even now shows No new effective drugs have been found yet as of now in these old methods.

Expecting "herd immunity" allowing virues to spread unlimitedly is a kind of "our science's defeat" by this virus.  Of course, under the current fake science, there is nothing we can do except for relying on herd immunity or quarantine.

In fact, we are living in unusual times.
Our basic science has stopped progressing since unrealistic quantum mechanics was introduced 100 years ago.

This unfortunate event started due to the fact that physicists had to give up real moving electron's model because there were No high-performance computers to calculate formidable three-body problem seen in multi-electron atoms in 1920s.

In quantum mechanical nonphysical wavefunction, an electron is No longer a physical particle as we imagine, it must spread and exist all over the places simultaneously, floating in different parallel worlds like a ghost-like dead and alive cat.

The only calculation tool in quantum mechanics is Schrödinger equation which is very time-consuming and unable to solve multi-electron atoms.  It just "chooses" fake solution which has No ability to predict any physical values, so useless.

This unrealistically spreading quantum electron wavefunction means two electrons can freely approach ( or move away from ) each other in a disorderly way, hence it cannot conserve total energy in multi-electron atoms.

Quantum mechanics makes a bad use of this violation of energy conservation law to generate fake molecular bond energy illegitimately.  ← This is the trick of quantum molecule, hence wrong.

So physicists stopped using this useless and unrealistic Schrödinger equation in multi-electron molecules, and instead, started to treat the whole solid or protein as if it were one fake quasi-electron with fake (= effective ) variable mass which can be even negative.

The current physics can only describe each material as "nonphysical bands" where a pseudo-electron with fictitious (= effective ) mass and quasi-momentum ( this p.3 left-lower ) does Not possess its physical shape except abstract math symbols ( each particle = a, b, c .. ? )

In a many-electron solid expressed as a fake one-electron band, its quantum calculation tool is also a bogus one-electron approximation ( this p.3 ) called DFT which is uselss, unable to predict any physical values like old Schrödinger equation, because it has to artificially choose pseudo-potential (= functional ) that always fails to explain phenomena ( this p.17 ) and lacks reality ( this p.31 ).

So physicists gave up using real particles, instead, they started to use unreal quasipaticle model to describe all physical phenomena such as semiconductor, superconductor, graphene, tunnel and solar cell.

In this quasiparticle model, physicists just artificially adjust the quasiparticle's fake mass and charge to different situations (= hence unable to predict physical values ), and the quasiparticle has No physical figure except nonphysical abstract math symbols ( this p.4 ).

So it's impossible to apply the current quantum physics based on unreal quasiparticles with nonphysical figure to real biology or medicine for drug discovery.

The problem is these unreal quasiparticle model already got the most prestigious Nobel prize ( this p.7 ), therefore, scientists cannot use other realistic particle model as a tool to develop science.

So physicists come to escape from real worlds into fictional fairyland such as black hole, Big Bang, wormhole, extra-dimensions, all of which are untestable or too far away to confirm as real, hence their research is a waste of taxpayers' money.

On the earth, physicists focus only on creating fictitious particles inside virtual circumstances of expensive colliders, which elusive particles are too unstable to isolate, hence unrealistic and useless except for getting prizes, circulating the name of "God particle" by selling books.

In the current quantum physics based on unreal quasiparicle, physicists try to use its imaginary parallel worlds, a dead and alive cat for fictional goal = quantum computer which is useless forever, and becomes a hotbed of investment scam to steal taxpayers' money.

Even if scientists fruitlessly continue research on fictional unseen quarks, black hole, dark matter, quantum computer, parallel worlds, clinging to old history, it's impossible to stop deadly COVID-19 virus.

Even the current only "theory of everything" = extradimensional string theory uniting quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity is helpless before this virus, except for turning away from reality.

Today's old-style lectures in schools is close to "ritual" rather than "science" in order to brainwash students into accepting their old fake science such as Big Bang, black hole and unseen dimensions, unconditionally.

Those useless colleges not only increase skill mismatch, underemployment and unnecessary student loans, but also become a center of spreading deadly contagious viruses.

We can acquire almost all knowledge through internet or books without wasting money and time in going to old-fashioned schools or universities in the present age.

But under the current stalled science, this "ritual" of going to college is the only criterion for judging graduates.

People are Not allowed to use other more realistic science, because the current academia desperately forbids it !  This is why even now many students have no choice but to go to useless universities to learn fake science as a "rite of passage", risking contracting life-threatening viruses.

Not only quantum parallel worlds but also global warming is out of touch with reality, while unseasonably cold temperature continues.

Warm temperature seems to decrease the risk of deadly Coronavirus.  So if Greta was right in "listen to scientists", it means those climate change scientists hope colder weather which favors this virus will bring more death and economic damage to us.

So due to the present fake science taught in schools or pushed by "scientists", our civilization could be "endangered".

Greta just tries to use "science" as a "money-making tool" to sell her books like other fake scientists by worsening people's life by Green new deal scam ?

Academia's hypocritical human rights, political correctness and their fake science could endanger our lives by repeatedly criticizing necessary "closing border" to contain viruses as "xenophobia".

Coronavirus pandemic could result in drastic cultural change, while not only schools but also various sports events are cancelled across the world.

While qualifying competitions are Not proceeding as scheduled, this summer's Olympic game may be postponed.

Playing sports for staying healthy and watching sports for fun are good things.  But the current school education tends to be exploited by sports industry ?

Almost all students are unable to be professional or Olympic players.  What's the point of spending too much time in playing football, baseball or other sports as school club activity ?

In the current school system, students tend to be exploited by various greedy industrial organizations in the name of "education", and their future could be ruined by fake science which is useless for curing disease and viral infection that could be worsened by schools.

If our civilization is destroyed by this life-threatening virus pandemic, Not a virus but our "fake science" would be a main factor of this destruction.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Nobel prize cannot cure disease ?

[ The present "science" relies on fictitious particles.  ← useless in medicine. ]

(Q-1)  ↓ Deadly virus is beyond the power of  

Recently you may often hear phrases like "science-based Coronavirus policy."  But even with the present state-of-the-art science technology, containing deadly viruses seems to be very difficult.

The problem is the current "science" really has ability to stop viral pandemic ?  In fact, even simple common cold is still incurable now.

Also in climate change, despite famous Greta's slogan "unite behind science", green solar technology remains useless and just expensive.

Those climate activists' big crowds just increase the risk of spreading viruses like old-style college education.  Ironically, global warming seems to be the most effective cure for Coronavirus for now.

So world's leaders should stop wasting taxpayers' money in fruitless climate change policy, and instead, focus more resources on tackling deadly viruses and saving lives amid unusually cold weather.

Every year, prestigious Nobel prize was awarded to great scientific achievement in life science, which helps our "science" keep advancing ?

But we still find No effective way to eliminate viruses from our bodies.  Viruses can sneak into cells and multiply in a sophisticated way which is out of reach of our current human technology.

HIV is still incurable.  Old-fashioned vaccination with more than a 200 year history is still the only preventive way despite its uncertain effectiveness.

Vaccine is Not a cure.  It just activates human inborn immune system, hoping body's natural immune cells may attack viruses, leaving it to chance.

Too strong immune response could have an adverse effect on normal lung tissues, and become the cause of death by Coronavirus.

So removing only viruses selectively from bodies is essential for saving patients' lives.  But the current fictional "science" prevents us from doing it.

To eliminate Coronavirus effectively without damaging normal cells, we need to know the precise mechanism of how viruses invade human cells at the protein and molecular level.

Even this basic task is impossible under the current fantasy basic physics which is hell-bent on unreal parallel-worlds, fictitious particles with illusory mass.

According to this wacky quantum physics, each atom, even a virus can exist in two places at once like a ghost cat, allegedly using the power of "multiverse".

The current only atomic theory = quantum mechanics has No realistic tool to explain molecular interaction, meaning we have No method of investigating viral infection mechanism at the atomic level for now.  ← This is shown in the fact that only old-fashioned quarantine is viable measure each time new viral pandemic happens.

Quantum physics has to rely on unscientific approximation called band theory which treats the whole many-electron material as if it were one fake pseudo-electron with fictitious (= effective ) mass which can be negative.

Quantum mechanics needs to use fictitious quasiparticle model to describe various physical phenomena such as semiconductor, superconductor, solar cell, imaginary future computer and quantum biology.

Strange to say, No physicists can write their research papers without the help of this unreal quasiparticle with unrealistic mass, fractional-charge, which can even split into its orbit and charge components, they claim.

Of course, as long as the current science needs the help of "unreal quasiparticle" to explain any physical phenomena, it can never be applied to medicine or drug development.

What shape and size is this quasiparticle ?  Unfortunately quantum mechanics is unable to give concrete physical shape to each electron and fictitious quasiparticle.  It just gives nonphysical math symbol (= a, b, c .. ) to each particle ( this p.4 ).  ← Impractical.

"Scientists" are unable to use realistic particle with concrete physical shape at the atomic level, therefore it's impossible to apply the current useless physics theory to actual medicine or other technology.

The problem is the most prestigious Nobel prize already endorsed these unreal quasiparticles ( this p.8, this p.16 ) as the only standard theory, so No physicists are allowed to use other realistic particles which could replace fictitious quasiparticle model as an atomic tool.

The current "science" forces researchers to use ghost-like quasiparticles with No 'tangible' physical shape.  How can they clarify the precise molecular mechanism of diseases without knowing precise particle's shape and interaction ?  ← Impossible.

How did the present science become so useless and miserably unrealistic, losing touch with actual world ?

In 1920s when quantum mechanics was born, there were No modern computers to calculate three-body problem such as multi-electron atom helium.

Bohr's realistic atomic model succeeded in explaining hydrogen atomic energies and got Nobel prize, but failed to explain helium energy due to lack of modern computer in 1920s.

Quantum mechanics could Not solve helium atom, either.  But it could get seemingly good (= fake ) energy value using artificially chosen approximate solution and time-consuming integration of electron wavefunctions.

So the lack of modern computer 100 years ago is the only reason why unscientific quantum mechanics started to be used as the only authoritative atomic theory and forbids us to use any other realistic theory, hence it hampers our scientific development now.

Choosing artificial trial wavefunction as fake solution means quantum mechanics has No ability to predict any physical values.

In quantum mechanical calculation, we have to guess and choose fake approximate solution called trial wavefunction or basis set for atomic calculation out of infinite choices.

Basically, in order to get (fake) energy close to experimental values, each chosen trial wavefunction (= corresponds to each electron density ) must be a very complicated form consisting of many terms.

Therefore, integrating Schrödinger's equation of many electron atoms with complicated wavefunctions to calculate Coulomb energy between all electron density pieces needs an unrealistically great deal of time, and hence impractical in large molecules ( this p.13, this p.6 ).

And we prove no matter what (fake) solutions are chosen, they can never be true helium solution.  Therefore, quantum mechanical method is physical wrong, not only time-consuming.

True solution means the total energy (= the sum of kinetic and Coulomb potential energies ) must be always conserved and constant, wherever electrons are inside electron wavefunction.

For the total energy to be conserved (= having true solution in helium atom ), Schrödinger's helium must split into three unreal independent hydrogen atoms which is impossible, hence wrong.

This fatal flaw of quantum mechanics originates from the fact that Schrödinger wavefunction expressing each electron always spreads all over space as a electron cloud, therefore, two electrons (= clouds ) cannot avoid each other, though Coulomb repulsion is actually working between two electrons.  ← This is why energy conservation law is violated in quantum mechanical multi-electron (= wavefunction ) atoms.

For quantum mechanical electron's wavefunction to avoid other electrons obeying normal Coulomb repulsion between electrons, its "probability" wavefunction must be unrealistically sharper only at the electron's position which just increases the electron's kinetic energy drastically, hence stable molecular bonds are unable to be formed.

Quantum mechanics makes a bad use of violation of energy conservation law to get total energy seemingly close to actual energy by "cheating", which is another proof that quantum mechanics wrong.

In this cheating scheme, quantum mechanics illegitimately lowers electron's kinetic energy by violating total energy conservation, which is exacerbated by artificial technique called overlap ( exchange ) integral.

Quantum mechanics extends this overlap integral to Pauli exclusion principle which is supposed to be expressed as nonphysical antisymmetric wavefunction and its exchange integral which strangely lacks real force carrier.

Quantum mechanics neither accepts Pauli exclusion repulsion as real force nor gives any physical interpretation to Pauli principle ( this p.6, this p.3 ).

We proved this antisymmetric Pauli exclusion model by quantum mechanics is self-contradictory, hence wrong.

So quantum mechanics cannot calculate real atomic force, though "force" is necessary for all chemical reaction.

Quantum electrons are unable to avoid other electrons due to its spreading probability wavefunction.  ← Therefore, actual Coulomb forces are unable to be expressed in quantum wavefunction.

Then, they have to rely on "cheating" to illegitimately lower electron's kinetic energy and create seeming molecular bond energy by violating energy conservation and Virial theorem using suspicious overlap integral of time-consuming Schrödinger equation which just gives fake energy, Not force.

Without knowing actual "force", it is impossible to predict or explain actual molecular interaction between Coronavirus and human cell membranes.  Hence, applying quantum mechanics to developing effective drugs for virus is a pipe dream you will never realize.

If we can treat each electron as an "actually-moving charge" (= this realistic model was unable to be used properly in 1920s due to lack of modern computer ), we can easily calculate Coulomb energy and usable "actual force" between electrons which can avoid other electrons satisfying total energy conservation law.

As a calculating tool in larger molecules and solids, quantum mechanics replaced useless and time-consuming Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms by one fake electron model ( this p.3 ) called density functional theory (= DFT or Kohn-Sham theory ), which is terrible theory.

This bogus one-electron approximation = DFT is most widely used as a quantum mechanical calculation tool now.  But of course, it is impossible to describe actual multi-electron molecules or solids by one-electron pseudo-DFT model, therefore, it always fails.

DFT replaced many-electron potential by fictitious effective potential called exchange-correlation functional which form is unknown, so can be artificially chosen (= therefore, unable to predict physical values ).  It lacks physical reality ( this p.31 ), and always fails ( this p.17 ).

We already have technology of observing and manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope (= AFM ).

So we should already be able to control atoms one by one and construct useful, sophisticated nano-machines to tackle life-threatening micro-organisms and diseases.  But we still cannot.

Because useless quantum mechanics does Not allow "scientists" to use realistic atomic model except quantum mechanical fake quasiparticle model with unreal one-electron approximation (= DFT ), when they interpret measured atomic forces.  ← Science stops progressing.

In conclusion, in order to cure deadly diseases and viruses, the current impractical basic "science" should be replaced by new practical, realistic one.

Otherwise we will continue to be afflicted by life-threatening diseases, viruses and economic recession, forever.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Black hole and Corona virus.

[ Fantasy "science" is helpless in curing disease. ]

(V-1)  ↓ Global warming is the only cure for    ?

Black hole and Big Bang universe may be the biggest obstacle to containing deadly Corona virus.  I'll tell you why.

Recently, many physicists and bloggers suddenly started to talk about a bogus science article "Wormholes reveal a way to manipulate Black hole information in Lab ?".

First of all, Wormhole is purely a fictional concept like time machines and unseen black hole with extra-dimensions.

Scientists and universities are wasting their time in ridiculous idea associating a few atomic interaction in laboratory with unrelated imaginary black hole gravity.  ← Nonsense.

This sad fact reflects the current science that considers imaginary black hole and BigBang, which are useless for our daily life, as more important topic than any other urgent things like deadly viruses.

Corona outbreak forced many countries to close schools and universities to prevent viruses, which gives us a good opportunity to rethink whether the current school really teaches useful things or not.

All the present science is based on unreal quantum mechanics allegedly made of fantasy parallel worlds, 10-dimensions, a ghost-like cat, negative mass, fraudulent quantum computer.

Physics turned from "science" into just "fiction" which is useless except for selling books, giving meaningless lectures, events, podcasts, clinging to old history..  ← None of these is related to "actual science".

Hypothetical black hole has never been useful for 100 years, except as a tool to attract attention by a doubtful picture and political correctness, just wasting taxpayers' money in unnecessary telescopes.

Even stars allegedly orbiting around black hole (← ? ) can never be seen due to very thick dusts.  If Einstein's "time stop" is real, black hole can never exist.  So the current theory is self-contradictory and wrong.

Fantasy expanding universe, which also has been useless since it was first proposed, is Not happening around the earth.  ← Big Bang can be treated as fiction, unnecessary science.

The idea that uniform cosmic microwave is remnant of early universe (← ? ) is unrealistic, just spawning other fantasy theories.

Uniform microwaves can be naturally considered as a proof of "uniform medium".  Redshift is the result of Compton scattering, because lights naturally hit innumerable dusts and gradually lose their energy (= therefore, longer wavelength ) on their extremely long journey through space.

So even if Coronavirus fear cancels the biggest science meeting, their pseudo-science has No influence on our daily life from the beginning.

Gigantic particle colldiers are also a huge waste of money in fiction, worthless except for selling books, making documentary or getting prizes where gathering of many people just increases the risk of viral infection.

This year's unusually cold weather is probably one of the main reasons why Corona virus outbreak started in cold dry densely-populated area like China and spread into other cold countries in the world.

So ironically, hot temperature or global warming, which "scientists" repeatedly call "existential threat", seems to be the most effective cure for this deadly virus for now.

Actually, unusually cold weather is gripping the world even now.
Globalists manipulate scientists and Greta, fabricating unnaturally unbalanced temperature map inconsistent with actual cold weather.

"Not-hot" weather and useless universities are the reason Sanders's radical Green new deal and wasteful educational plan were very hard to win voters' mind.

If Sanders was really a "socialist" for the poor people, he wouldn't have pushed this crazy Green new deal which would just torment especially poor people under the current fictional "science" taught in schools.

In this internet era, old-fashioned universities where many students gather and sit in the same classroom, is not only an inefficient way of educating people, but also could be a new epicenter of deadly viral infection.

As long as scientists believe quantum mechanical illusion = parallel-worlds, medical innovation stalls, and curing fatal diseases is impossible forever.

This fictional basic quantum physics prevents the current biotechnology from utilizing atomic interaction which is the key to all biochemical reactions and clarifying disease mechanism.

Human technology is helpless with No cure for viruses now.

Very old vaccination is Not a cure, it just stimulates natural immune cells a little and prays to God leaving all the rest of work to human body.  Due to this randomness, developing vaccine takes time, and it's often ineffective.

Even now, medicl researchers have to rely on old style "trial and error screening approach" to find lucky drugs from among many candidates, leaving it to chance, like ancient people tried to find drugs among natural plants.

They try to apply Tamiflu (= ineffective in influenza which was the original target ) or other drugs (= ineffective in Ebola which was the original target ) to new Coronavirus blindly.

These old-fashioned "trial and error" approach is the reason most clinical trials end up in failures.

Quantum mechanics has been the only atomic theory and unchanged for 100 years despite its unreality, which fictional basic theory clearly obstructs developing useful drugs against virus and cancer.

Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics is unable to deal with many-electron atoms, hence hampers all applied science, because its spreading electron cloud model is unable to describe an actually moving electron.  It just offers nonphysical parallel worlds.

Quantum mechanics dismissed realistic atomic model and started to treat the whole solid, crystal and proteins as "one fake quasi-electron" with fake (= effective ) mass which can even be negative.

As a calculating tool in larger molecules and solids, quantum mechanics replaced useless and time-consuming Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms by one fake electron model ( this p.3 ) called density functional theory (= DFT or Kohn-Sham theory ), which is terrible theory.

This bogus one-electron approximation = DFT is most widely used as a quantum mechanical calculation tool now.  But of course, it is impossible to describe actual multi-electron molecules or solids by one-electron pseudo-DFT model, therefore, it always fails.

DFT replaced many-electron potential by fictitious effective potential called exchange-correlation functional which form is unknown, so can be artificially chosen (= therefore, unable to predict physical values ).  It lacks physical reality ( this p.10 ), and always fails ( this p.17 ).

So quantum mechanics has to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge to describe physical phenomena of all materials consisting of many electrons which Schrödinger equation fails to explain.

Useless Schrödinger equation dismissing real atomic model due to the lack of modern computer in 1920s, prevents us from using practical atomic model in applied science.

And only imaginary concepts such as black hole or Big Bang which are too far away to confirm and have No influence on our daily life, are left as the current scientists' research imaginary target and forbid us from applying any other more realistic atomic theory in medical treatment.

We already have technology of observing and manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope (= AFM ).

So we should already be able to control atoms one by one and construct useful, sophisticated nano-machines to tackle life-threatening micro-organisms and diseases.  But we still cannot.

Because useless quantum mechanics does Not allow scientists to use realistic atomic model except quantum mechanical fake quasiparticle model with unreal one-electron approximation (= DFT ), when they interpret measured atomic forces.  ← Science stops progressing.

Therefore, the present fictional science such as black hole, Big Bang, extra-dimenisons and parallel-world quantum mechanics is the biggest obstacle to treating dangerous diseases, as shown here.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

'Scientists' are always true ?

[ The myth that quantum mechanics is needed for computers is untrue. ]

(C-1)  ↓ Transistor and solar cell by unreal   in QM

All physicists repeatedly say "The current technology from computer transistor to smartphone needs quantum mechanics." without mentioning the detail.

The weird thing is still Nobody understands quantum physics filled with fantasies such as parallel worlds, extradimension, a cat in two places at once, negative mass.

All things 'scientists' say are true ?
The myth that quantum mechnaics is necessary for computer technology could be wrong ?

If unrealistic quantum mechanics has nothing to do with the modern computers, contrary to scientists' views, their other consensus that "global warming is man-made" could be wrong, too.

Actually, the world is gripped by unusually cold weather against global warming consensus.  Corona outbreak is due to this year's unusually cold weather ?

Green new deal is just a pipe dream tormenting taxpayers by fictional science which is nothing but a political tool only for rich globalists.

To go straight to the bottom line, quantum mechanics is Not necessary for the current computers at all.  Scientists benefiting from those fake science just say it for protecting their vested interests and selling their books.

A computer CPU can only do very simple task recognizing just two patterns: 0 or 1, depending on whether enough charges are accumulated in a capacitor or not, which is just classical mechanics.

To move electric charges as we like, we need to manipulate electric current, resistance ( or conductance ).

A transistor controlling the electric current is made of semiconductor which had been known to change its electric conductance in different conditions since long before quantum mechanics was born in 1920s.

In 1940s decades after quantum mechanics was invented, scientists finally found good semiconductors to control electric currents applicable to transistor through many failures.

This time lag shows quantum mechanics has nothing to do with computer transistor or smartphone.

If quantum mechanics was really the key to the invention of computer transistor, scientists would have already invented modern computers in 1920s.  But it didn't occur.

The existing theories, quantum mechanics did Not work ( this p.3 ) at all.  Discovery of transistor is just the result of researchers' longtime experience, "trial and errors" approach like Edison's lightbulb.

So the conventional phrase that computer technology uses (fantasy) quantum mechanics, which scientists like to repeat, is untrue, just fake news.

And this is closely related to the fact that electric cars and solar cells are inferior technolgoy forever and unrealistic Green new deal is doomed to fail under the present academia's theory.

Each transistor consists of two types of semiconductors: n-type is doped with atoms (= P, Sb ) with excessive valence electrons, so tends to be negatively charged.

p-type semiconductor is doped with atoms (= B ) with less valence electrons, so tends to be positively charged.

Therefore, electrons can flow from negative n-type to positive p-type semiconductors, which is the basic mechanism of all computer transistors.

The problem is quantum mechanics cannot use realistic atomic model based on "actually moving electrons", instead, it uses vague electron cloud model spreading over all space.

As I said, this nonphysical quantum mechanical electron cloud is unable to form real molecular bond without cheating, because its probability wavefunction can neither avoid other electrons nor conserve total energy.

So quantum mechanics dismissed realistic atomic model and started to treat the whole solid or crystal as one fake quasi-electron with fake (= effective ) mass which can even be negative.

This quantum one-fake-electron model is called band theory which replaces realistic many-electron atomic picture with abstract, unphysical "linear bands" where one fake free electron with fake effective mass and pseudo-momentum moves as current, when it is excited from valence to conduction band.

According to this band theory, when the energy (band) gap between valence and conduction bands is narrow ( or wide ), it's supposed to be metal ( or insulator ).

Energy gap (= electric resistance ) of semiconductor is just between metal and insulator, and it can be changed depending on materials and other conditions, doping so that it can be applied to transistor.

This energy (band) gap and its unreal effective mass are just freely-adjustable parameters which must be determined by experiments ( Not quantum theory ).

Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics is useless, unable to solve multi-electron atoms.

Quantum mechanics just chooses fake solution called trial wavefunction with freely-adjustable parameters, hence it cannot predict any new physical values, so practically useless.

In larger solids and crystals, they replaced useless and time-consuming Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms by one fake electron model ( this p.3 ) called density functional theory (= DFT or Kohn-Sham theory ).

This bogus one-electron approximation = DFT is most widely used in quantum mechanics now.  But of course, it is impossible to describe actual multi-electron molecules or solids by one-electron pseudo-DFT model, therefore, it always fails.

DFT replaced many-electron potential by fictitious effective potential called exchange-correlation functional which form is unknown, so can be artificially chosen (= therefore, unable to predict physical values ).  It lacks physical reality ( this p.10 ), and always fails ( this p.17 ).

So quantum mechanics has to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge to describe physical phenomena of all materials consisting of many electrons which Schrödinger equation fails to explain.

Solar cell also uses this quantum nonphysical band model where a valence electron with fake effective mass is supposed to be excited by sunlight up to conduction band which is utilized as electric current in house.

This excited electron and hole is supposed to form fictitious quasiparticle called exciton which has nonphysical figure and motion ( this p.44 ), so meaningless for practical use.

As shown here, quantum mechanics has No ability to describe physical phenomena using only real particles, which is a decisive reason quantum mechanics and its condensed matter physics are false and lack reality.

This is why the current solar technology and electric car are useless forever, and Green new deal is nothing but science scam.

Basic mechanism of solar cell is very simple, and has Not progressed since 1800s when quantum mechanics wasn't invented.

Sunlight is absorbed in semiconductor.  → generate electric current in solar cell.

All researchers can do is look for better semiconductors by blind "trial and error" approach like Edison's lightbulb and transistors, which old technique has already reached the limit.

The present man-made solar cell is far inferior to natural sophisticated nanomachines = plants exploiting sunlights in photosynthesis producing energy sources much more efficiently, manipulating complicated atomic interaction.

We still cannot construct these sophisticated nanomachines such as plants or imitate their photosynthesis, which Mother Nature invented on a long road of evolution, because useless old quantum mechanical theory hampers the technological breakthrough in atomic manipulation.

We already have technology of observing and manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope (= AFM ).

So we should already be able to control atoms one by one and construct useful, sophisticated nano-machines like natural plants, micro-organisms and drugs for deadly diseases.  But we still cannot.

Because useless quantum mechanics does Not allow scientists to use realistic atomic model except fake quasiparticle model with unreal one-electron approximation (= DFT ), when they interpret measured atomic forces.  ← Science stops progressing.

In conclusion, physicists' favorite claim that our computer PC and smartphone need (unreal) quantum mechanics is completely wrong.

This fact makes other myth of 97% scientists' global warming consensus unreliable.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Quantum wave particle "unreality"

[ caused yellow-vests and unreal Green new deal ? ]

(C-1)  ↓ Unrealistic quantum mechanics →    ?

"Science" should be the one that makes people's life happier and convenient.

Actually, since the industrial revoluton, all people's life across the world, regardless of whether they are rich or poor, has improved.  The world's life expectancy has dramatically risen.

But the current universities, which should get people's life better by teaching them science, turned into outdated 'ivory tower' that just torments students by skyrocketing tuition.

Increasing burden on taxpayers in an attempt to get more students into worthless universities doesn't work.  Graduates not only waste their precious youth in unnecessary education, but also suffer skill mismatch, their future and dream may be destroyed by college education.

Scientists persistently pressure governments to waste more taxpayers' money in illusory science such as black hole, Big Bang, extradimensions, parallel-world quantum computer in vain.

Even the current condensed matter physics is hell-bent on using fictitious quasiparticles with fake mass and unreal extradimensional string theory.

Under the current useless basic physics, all applied science stalls.  Globalists and academia force inferior electric car and unrealistic Green new deal on taxpayers, which naturally invites people's anger and Yellow-vest protests across the world.

Because the current so-called "science" is no longer science, it just tries to make our life "unhappier" and inconvenient by thrusting useless outdated technology on us.

Climate change science is just scam with No progress, just wasting taxpayers' money in inferior solar energy based on fictional quasiparticles, a dead and alive cat quantum superposition.

Only a handful of globalist rich elites, academia benefit from these fake science which just imposes tax, stifles people who are Not allowed to seek other possibilities of new useful, practical science.

No more American dream.  The gap between rich and poor is fixed or growing, if the basic science is shackled to fiction forever.

Actually, the world is hit by record cold temperature now.

They hide inconvenient truth that global warming is Not happening as shown in Arctic and Antarctic increasing sea ice, while they treat truant Greta as if she was "science goddess" neglecting other hard-working students.

Stalled basic physics stops medicical technology from advancing, keeping many diseases incurable forever.

Virus treatment has Not progressed, either.  We rely only on quarantine and very old vaccination which often failed.  There's nothing human technology can do to tackle viral infection directly.

Scientists forgot practical use of science, instead, they are obsessed only with selling books, repeating meaningless lectures, events, workshop.

The fact that the current physics is fiction only inside books urged Amazon to use their fortune to advertise fake global warming and parallel-world quantum computer which are useless except for getting taxpayers' money in the name of 'science'.

We just hope those climate change billionaire wouldn't waste their fortune to manipulate the media and scientists' data, like other fake science.

All this mess originates from the current physics avoiding clear answer to whether a thing is a particle or wave which still Nobody understands for 100 years.  ← crazy !

Many experiments confirmed that an electron is an "actually moving" particle which can be accelerated by electromagnetic field.

And a moving electron is known to cause de Broglie wave which wavelength varies depending on the electron's momentum.

This way to treat each electron as a real particle and its de Broglie wave generated around the electron as a real wave is very reasonable and realistic with a great potential to be used as an useful tool in applied science.  Because "real objects" can be naturally applied to real work.

Actually, an atomic model based on these real electron and wave could successfully explain all hydrogen-like atoms and ions and got Nobel prize.

The problem is this realistic atomic model with "dynamic electrons" was unable to explain complicated two-electron helium atom which is three-body problem, hence impossible to calculate without modern computers that didn't exist in the early 20th century.

Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics could also obtain the same exact energy values as Bohr model.

But quantum mechanics dismissed the concept of real particle and wave !  Instead, it just mixes an electron and its de Broglie wave as one nonphysical "wavefunction" where even a single electron spreads out over all space as blurry cloud.

So in quantum mechanics, a single electron must pass through both slits at once using fantasy parallel worlds in double-slit interference.  ← An electron can be a particle and wave at once ? Though it's physically impossible.

On the other hand, in a realistic model, an electron passes through only one of double slits and its de Broglie wave around the electron passes through both slits and causes interference.  ← very reasonable logic.

Schrödinger equation was also unable to solve two-electron helium.  But quantum mechanics which already discarded "reality" was "allowed" to play other fouls.

Quantum mechanics just chooses fake solution called trial wavefunction with freely-adjustable parameters, hence it cannot predict any new physical values, so practically useless.

The sum of electron's kinetic energy and Coulomb potential energy is the total energy E which must be always conserved and constant.

Only solvable one-electron hydrogen atom has true solution which always gives conserved (= constant ) total (= ground state ) energy wherever an electron exists inside an atomic wavefunction.

Unsolvable helium atom can never have true solution whatever trial (fake) wavefunction you choose, which is one of decisive reasons why quantum mechanics is wrong, and only a realistic model with moving electrons is correct, as shown in this page.

It's impossible for unsolvable helium Schrödinger wavefunction to have the conserved (= constant ) total energy in every electrons' positions inside a multi-electron atom.

So physicists played foul, artificially changed the interpretation of wavefunction into "probability" of finding an electron.

Due to this nonphysical interpretation of "probability" quantum wavefunction, physicists did Not need to care about true solution.

Approximate (fake) solution (= trial wavefunction ) which they choose gives different total energies (= because the energy is Not conseved or constant ) in different electron's positions at a different "probabilities".

Quantum mechanics just gets "average (= expectation ) fake energy" of many different total energies by integrating chosen wavefunction instead of solving it (= because of "unsolvable" ).

This quantum mechanical approximate method of "choosing artificial solution" can get ( fake ) total energy seemingly close to actual value, because they can choose any convenient fake solution with freely-adjustable parameters.  ← Not a successful theory at all.

The fatal flaw of quantum "probability" electron cloud is that each electron can Not avoid other electrons, because even a single electron must always spread over all space symmetrically around a nucleus.

Especially in molecules, this quantum mechanical electron cloud is unable to form stable molecular bond, because in H2 molecule, an electron of one atomic nucleus has to approach another nucleus, avoding another electron for these two atoms in a molecule to attract each other and form molecular bond.

To do so, two electrons of H2 molecule must be constantly avoiding each other due to Coulomb repulsion between them, and each electron has to be localized on only one side of each nucleus.

For an electron to be localized to only one side of a nucleus unsymmetrically, the electron "probability" wavefunction must sharply increase only at the point of the electron.

The electron's kinetic energy in Schrödinger equation is expressed as a "derivative of the wavefunction".  So the electron's kinetic energy drastically increases, as the probability wavefunction gets higher and sharper only at the electron's position.

So to localize an electron to only one side of nucleus, the electron's kinetic energy must unrealistically increase, which cannot lower total energy, therefore, cannot form stable molecular bond.

On the other hand, in a realistic atomic model, an electron as a particle is separated from its de Broglie wave around the electron.  This de Broglie wave of Bohr model just expresses the electron's momentum (= kinetic energy ), which has nothing to do with the electron's "probability" of quantum wavefunction.

So even if an electron moves (= localized ) into one side of a nucleus, avoiding another electron, Bohr's atomic electron's de Broglie wave does Not have to be sharper (= different from the fact that the electron existing probability needs to be higher only on one side in quantum wavefunction ), because Bohr's electron de Broglie wave has nothing to do with electron's "probability".

As a result, only Bohr's realistic model based on "actually moving" electrons and real de Broglie waves unrelated to the electron probability can form stable molecules, lowering total energy by avoiding other electrons, without increasing kinetic energy like sharper quantum electron probability wavefuncton.

For quantum spreading electron cloud to form stable molecular bonds without avoiding other electrons, it has to rely on "cheating" by lowering only electron's kinetic energy in an unfair way violating total energy conservation and Virial theorem.

The trick is one electron of H2 molecule can approach another nucleus (= lowers potential energy ) without increasing kinetic energy (= total energy = potential + kinetic energy is Not conserved ), when two hydrogen atomic wavefunctions are chosen as (fake) approximate solution of H2 molecule.

By artificially placing each electron in both different atoms in a molecule and using nonphysical overlap integral, the effect of lowering kinetic energy ( in unfair way ) is enhanced.  ← Relying on this wrong physics violating basic physical principle (= energy is Not conserved ) as the origin of molecular bonds proves quantum mechanics is false.

Quantum mechanics extends this superposition of one electron in two different atoms in a molecule to Pauli exclusion principle which is supposed to be expressed as nonphysical antisymmetric wavefunction.

But quantum mechanics neither accepts Pauli exclusion repulsion as real force nor gives any physical interpretation to Pauli principle ( this p.6, this p.3 ).

We proved this antisymmetric Pauli exclusion model by quantum mechanics is self-contradictory, hence wrong.

Furthermore, quantum Pauli principle expressed as "antisymmetric wavefunction" is too weak to explain Pauli repulsion between molecules, therefore unreal H3 molecule is possible in quantum mechanics.  ← "Antisymmetric" description of Pauli principle is wrong.

So in larger atoms, molecules and solids, these quantum mechanical interactions based on contradictory assumptions are not only impractical but also physically meaningless.

Under this useless quantum mechanics, physicists stopped thinking about actual interactions among many electrons.  Instead, they consider the whole molecules or solids consisting of many electrons as one fake quasi-electron model called band theory.

And they replaced Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms by one fake electron model ( this p.3 ) called density functional theory (= DFT or Kohn-Sham theory ).

This bogus one-electron approximation = DFT is most widely used in quantum mechanics now.  But of course, it is impossible to describe actual multi-electron molecules or solids by one-electron pseudo-DFT model, therefore, it always fails.

DFT replaced many-electron potential by fictitious effective potential called exchange-correlation functional which form is unknown, so can be artificially chosen (= therefore, unable to predict physical values ).  It lacks physical reality ( this p.10 ), and always fails ( this p.17 ).

So quantum mechanics has to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge to describe physical phenomena of all materials consisting of many electrons which Schrödinger equation fails to explain.

The current climate change technology such as solar cells also depends on fictitious quasiparticle, which is why the current electric car is still useless (= forever ), and Sanders green new deal is impossible, nothing but science scam ( by globalists.  So they pretend to be socialists ? )

Therefore, climate change science is contradictory, because scientists desperately stops developing basic science and innovation while they are always shouting "climate emergency !"

Humans already have technology of observing and manipulating each single atom using atomic force microscope (= AFM ).

So we should already be able to control atoms one by one and construct useful nano-machines to cure diseases.  But we still cannot.

Because useless quantum mechanics does Not allow scientists to use realistic atomic model except fake quasiparticle model with unreal one-electron approximation (= DFT ), when they interpret measured atomic forces.  ← Science stops progressing.

As seen here, all problems such as useless universities, job mismatch, yellow vest protests triggered by unfeasible Green new deal and carbon tax, strange Greta phenomena originate from fictional quantum mechanics where whether a thing is a particle or a wave is uncertain forever.

See this week physics is still useless.

 

Continued from

See previous version of criticizing top journals.

 

to

2020/2/28 updated. Feel free to link to this site.