- Criticize top journals. (20/ 10/30)

*(S-1) ↓ Unreal quasiparticle, parallel worlds by *

Actually, the current leading theory of everything uniting Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics is just a "science **fiction**" embracing **fantasy** extra-dimensions and its leading physicists still "endorses" untrustworthy candidate only for protecting their dubious "science", trying to keep us **ignorant** of truth.

See this week physicis is still useless.

*(N-1) ↓ Dubious first room-temperature superconductor in *

In Galileo's era, free thoughts, free speech and true "science" have
been **suppressed** by then-**academia** = medieval church. People had been **compelled** to accept *imaginary* flat-earth pseudo-science **blindly**.

Have you ever thought the same horrible "science-fiction" story is happening even in the **present** highly-modernized society ?

See this week physics is still useless.

*(S-1) ↓ Any microscopes detect only pseudo-particles in * *?*

Quantum mechanics hampers interpreting the microscopic observation of atoms.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(A-1) ↓ Real electron force can't be obtained by *

The current so-called "science" is just "illusion" which is getting us **no**where near curing diseases ? Dazzling prizes are just "camouflage" to hide inconvenient truth ?

See this week physics is still useless.

*(P-1) Illusory concepts spread by journals and *

What if today's *sacred* "science" taught in schools is just a **lie** ?

Schools and universities are just the places infested with viruses and science fiction, tormenting students by raising tuition ?

If so, the highest academic organizations such as prestigious Nobel prize and top science journals could be a main **source** of *immoral*, **fake** science.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ Quantum mechanics needs unreal quasi-particle *

Recentry, the top peer-reviewed science journal Nature gave sensational coverage to **fictitious** quasi-particle called "**anyon**" which might have finally be found, though it's an *unreal* particle ?

Quasiparticle with unrealistically-changeable fictitious mass is Not an actual elementary particle. Real particles must have their own unchangeable, **definite** charge and mass.

Why is a **quasi**-particle, which is just made of other multiple elementary particles pretending to be an independent (fictitious) particle, such a big deal ? Is it even worth "science" ?

This **un**scientific tendency dominating today's academia worshiping unreal objects is seen in the way physicists "intentionally **mis**interpret" observed electric current called quantum Hall effect as one caused by **illusory** quasiparticles.

When electric current is flowing under some electric and magnetic fields, its electric conductance (= reciprocal of resistance ) sometimes shows peculiar quantized values.

When this electric conductance is a fraction times e^{2}/h (= e is electric charge, h is Planck constant ), this phenomenon is called "fractional quantum Hall effect".

All real particles such as electrons and protons have their unique **unchangeable** definite charge (= the smallest charge is always "e", which cannot split into a smaller fractional-charge ! ) and mass.

So it is certain that all physical phenomena including this quantum Hall effect are caused by behavior of **real** electrons and nuclei with *fixed* charge (= an **integer** multiple of charge "e" ) and mass which can **neither** be changed nor **divided** under any electromagnetic fields.

But today's quantum mechanics is so **unrealistic** as to say *stupid* things: this "fractional Hall effect" is caused by "illusory fractional-charge quasiparticle" called *anyon* ( this p.18 ).

Of course, a real electron can **never** split into smaller fractional-charges except in "imaginary" world. Ignoring this obvious fact, Nobel commitee awarded *illusory* fractional-charge quasiparticle the most prestigious Nobel prize ( this p.17 ). ← The **end** of real "science".

Furthermore, today's physics claims electrons inside this quantum Hall effect can unrealistically change not only their charge but also "mass" into fictitious effective mass which can even be fictional negative mass ( this p.5 ).

So the current only atomic theory = quantum mechanics relying on fake quasi-particle model with unrealistically-changeable charge and mass clearly **disagrees** with real-world phenomena caused only by "real particles", hence, quantum mechanics is **false**.

What's the **true** physical mechanism behind this quantum Hall effect allegedly riddled with *imaginary* fractional-charge quasiparticle anyons ?

One of these unreal anyon quasiparticles is said to be Majorana fermion.

Each time it has to face "truth", quantum mechanics always **withdraws** into its own '*shell*' **isolated** from real world, and says quantum Hall effect may be caused by **un**physical "topology" full of gibberish like "Berry phase" and "Chern number".

What the heck are these "topology", Berry phase and Chern number ? ← These are real objects ? Can we touch them ?

Unfortunately all these unfamiliar gibberish concepts are just *ghost*-like **illusion**, appearing only inside theoretical physicists' heads.

Artificial concept called Berry phase was introduced as "fictitious (= **Not** real ) magnetic field" appearing only inside **fake** quasi-momentum (= k ) space.

Berry phase is **neither** real phase nor real magnetic field ( this p.5, this p.4 upper ), hence No physical meaning.

Surprisingly, insane quantum mechanics allows this fake magnetic field = Berry phase to have unrealistic magnetic **monopole** called Chern number ( this p.5 right-lower, this p.6 ).

Hypothetical magnetic monopole is just **fiction** which is said to unrealistically separate north and south poles of magnet.

Of course, unphysical magnetic monopole can Not exist in our daily life except as fake quasiparticle.

So quantum mechanical **fake** picture of Hall effect haunted by illusory quasi-particle, monopole and fictitious magnetic field called Berry phase is just a **nonsense** unscientific theory telling us **nothing** about true physical mechanism based on real particles.

The media and academia repeatedly insist future quantum computer utilizing *fictional* **quasiparticle** would be "robust" against disturbance (= noise ), error-free, fault-tolerant, because it is "topologically protected" ?

↑ Fictional quasiparticle has such a "supernatural" power, which real particles don't have, for future imaginary computer, though quasiparticle itself does **Not** even exist ? ← How contradictory today's quantum theory is !

Why can physicsts so *confidently* and unrealistically **assert** still-imaginary quantum computer based on **unreal** quasiparticles ( which Microsoft pursues in vain ) could be such a superb, robust and error-free dreamlike machine ? ← Out of their mind ?

What are "physical grounds" for this imaginary "**robustness**" of still-unrealized quantum computer ?

They circulate **un**substantial hypothesis that when the world lines (= *illusory* **trail** ) of anyon quasiparticles pass around each other, those fictitious trails *intertwine* with each other like **imaginary** threads or shoestrings and form "braids" which is hard to separate, hence, could be a *hypothetically* **robust** and stable quantum computer ( this 3rd paragraph ) ?

↑ This explanation is **nonsense** and *groundless*, Not referring to any real physical objects, hence, showing **No** detailed convincing reason why imaginary quantum computer could be robust.

In fact, there is **No** real evidence that imaginary future quantum computer could be robust. Physicists just **artificially** *invented* "fake rules or principles" which are physically meaningless, **irrelevant** to our real world.

When we exchange positions of two real particles twice or make one particle go around another particle and return to its original position, the whole situation also returns to its original state.

But according to their *artificial* hypothesis, when we exchange **unreal** anyon quasiparticles or make one anyon go around another anyon and return to its original position, the whole situation becomes completely **different** from the initial state !

↑ Of course, such an occult thing would never happen in our real world, so anyon quasiparticle is purely **fiction**, but physicists recklessly try to make imaginary quantum computer based on fictional anyon quasiparticle and its artificially-invented hypothesis. ← nonsense.

This uncanny anyon-quasiparticle's behavior is expressed in the **non**physical way that exchanging two anyon quasiparticles causes their wavefunctions to acquire additional **fictitious** phase (= e^{iθ} ).

This fictitious *phase* (= e^{iθ} ) is supposed to take "any" values, so Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek named this **unreal** quasiparticle "**anyon**" ( this p.18 ).

← So even today's top physicists are **wasting** time in "fictional objects".

Different from real particles, quasiparticle anyons leave their "**fictitious** trails" in space where anyons passed around. ← Though physicists **never** clarify what this trail caused by anyon-quasiparticle is made of.

This fictitious unseen trail allegedly left by anyon quasiparticle could be entangled with other anyon's trail, which engraves "fictitious phase" in their trail as an information of how anyons passed each other, according to their ad-hoc hypothesis.

They try to exploit this "**fictitious** *trail* or phase" caused by exchanging two hypothetical quasiparticle anyons as "memory (= information )" of imaginary future quantum computer ( this p.13 ). ← nonsense.

↑ This **artificial** rule physicists suddenly fabricated out of nowhere about swapping quasiparticles causing unseen trail or phase ( this p.3 ) is **meaningless** with No reasonable grounds, because it has **nothing** to do with our real world from the beginning.

As long as anyons are **fictitious** *quasiparticles* (= Not real elementary particles ) which can**not** be isolated or confirmed, their empty theory about "fictitious trail or phase" left by anyons is also **invalid** and useless for any dreamlike future computers.

Two hypothetical anyon quasiparticles pass each other, exchange their positions (= called "braiding", this 5th last paragraph ) and cause unseen *ghost*-like phase shift (= e^{iθ} ) in their fictitious trails.

↑ Physicists artificially interpret this picture as the way
this artificial phase shift information would be encoded in intertwined quasiparticles's trails like a braided cord or hair, which can be loosened but **Not** undone ? ← so quantum computer could be **robust** ? ← nonsense.

↑ This imaginary hypothesis treating fictional intertwined trails (= memory information ? ) left by unreal anyon quasipartices as "**robust** braided cord or threads" could be a reason why future quantum computer based on quasiparticles would be **robust** and immune to error ( this p.3 left ) ? ← Impossible !

*Imaginary* paths or trails of two quasiparticle are "braided" like *imaginary* threads or shoelaces tied in knots, which knot could be used for *imaginary* **robust** quantum memory, just because the *knots* is usually hard to untie (= hence, robust ? ), regardless of whether those knots are real or not ( this 4th-5th paragraphs, this 8th-10th paragraphs ) ? ← **Baseless** empry hypothesis !

↑ This reason why fictional quantum computer based on unreal quasiparticles could be "robust" is **insane** and meaningless, because all these anyon quasiparticles and their fictitious trails or phases ( this p.2 right ) allegedly created by swapping two **unreal** quasiparticles are just **illusory** artificially-proposed concepts ( this p.3 right middle ).

So there is No physical evidence that illusory quantum computer could be robust against noise, empowered by imaginary fractional-charge quasiparticles.

The media and academia are blatantly spreading **fake** news such as "robust dreamlike quantum computer !" based only on *groundless* hypothesis.

Actually, Nobel laureate Frank = a namer of 'crazy anyon' seems to **obsess** only about how to use his pseudo-science and Nobel prize for a "cheap political tool" like extra-dimensional Witten, because their so-called "science" can **never** be put to practical use.

So the latest sensational news published in Nature physics claiming "direct observation of (**unreal**) anyon quasiparticle (← ? )" is **nonsense** and meaningless research, as long as quasiparticles themselves do Not really exist.

← This "sad" fact would **never** change, as long as we embrace **un**physical quantum mechanics.

Quasiparticle anyons ( and imaginary quantum computer ) still ( and forever ) have **No** practical application ( this 2-4th last paragraphs ).

Physicists just measured some change of "electric **current**" or "*conductance*", fitted these observed electric parameters to their ad-hoc anyon pseudo-model and claimed this may be a "direct evidence of anyons" , **without** directly isolating or observing fictitious anyon quasiparticle ( this 7th paragraph, this p.3 right ).

The present quantum mechanics based on unphysical Schrödinger equation is completely **useless** in describing **multi**-electron material, so it has to *insanely* treat the whole many-electron material as **one**-*pseudo*-electron or unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge.

This is reason why physicists had to introduce non-existent fractional-charge anyon *quaiparticles* to explain some electric conductance seen in quantum Hall effect, ignoring the fact that an elementary particle = electron can **never** split into smaller fractional charges.

Fractional quantum Hall effect can be realistically explained using quantized electron's de Broglie wave ( this p.7 ) where the electric conductance changes depending on the "number of electron's orbital layers and vacant quantized orbits" under different electromagnetic fields.

↑ This realistic interpretation of quantum Hall effect needs "**real** many electrons" which are actually **moving** and causing real de Broglie waves, which is **impossible** in today's unrealistic quantum mechanical picture where physicists always have to treat the whole multi-electron solid as unrealistically "indistinguishable one-*pseudo*-electron band model".

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ Fake quasi-particle mass model = * *?*

The current atomic theory = quantum mechanics is weird and unrealistic.

Quantum mechanical calculation tool = nonphysical Schrödinger equation can**not** even specify the exact position and velocity of each electron.

← True atomic behavior would be undisclosed by today's "science" forever.

This weird physical theory claims each electron must always spread **all** over space as vague probability cloud (= still lacks physical reality ) which means an electron exists in **multiple** *different* places **simultaneously** using fictional parallel worlds.

This fuzzy electron cloud covering all space in quantum mechanics causes serious problems and **contradiction**. It cannot even generate the most fundamental force = Coulomb electric force enough to form molecular bonds.

To generate fake molecular bond energy instead of using real Coulomb force, quantum mechanics has to rely on **crazy** assumption that all different electrons are indistinguishable existing in **all** different atoms and places *simultaneously* using fantasy **parallel** worlds.

These "*ghost*-like" electrons always existing in **every** place and every atom by splitting into multiple parallel worlds cause **non**physical "exchange energy" which occult energy cannot be described by any real physical objects on the earth.

This **non**physical exchange energy is supposedly **essential** for causing main attractive **pseudo**-(= Non Coulomb ) energy in molecular bond ( this p.3 ) and repulsive pseudo-energy in Pauli principle. ← This pseudo-energy is unrealistic, because there is only "exchange **energy**" with **No** "exchange force" or force carrier.

All physicists **failed** to give realistic physical meaning to this uncanny exchange energy ( this p.6, this p.11 ). Feynman finally admitted Nobody understands occult quantum mechanics.

So quantum mechanics, which can **Not** use any real physical force between particles or distinguish each individual electron, is a completely **useless** *dead* theory, because it is inherently **unable** to describe **multi**-particle reactions in many-electron solids and materials in a realistic way.

Then, how are today's physicists using this useless *obsolete* quantum mechanics to describe actual **many**-paricle (= many-electron ) materials such as metal, molecules, crystal, semiconductor and solar cells ?

Unbelievably, quantum mechanics resorts to illegitimate tricks of treating the **whole** many-electron material as "*one* **single** fake quasi-electron" model ( this p.2 ) called band theory ( this p.2 ).

In this **bogus** quantum mechanical approximation called "**band** theory", its one pseudo-electron representing the entire material is supposed to have **fictitious** *mass* (= called effective mass, which pseudo-mass can be freely changed even into **unreal** negative mass, this p.51 ), fake quasi-momentum and effective-pseudo-potential energy ( this p.11 ).

All today's physicists can do is artificially *manipulate* and **change** these **fake** physical concepts such as **quasi**-electron's effective mass and other *pseudo*-parameters (= spin-orbit interaction ) to fit experimentally measured results ( this p.3, this p.6 ) instead of predicting new physical phenomena using actually-existing real particles.

Quantum mechanics tries to **hide** and pack various complicated many-electron phenomena into "**non**physical band model" with artificially-manipulable **fake** electron's mass which can be freely changed = **contradicting** the fact that all **real** particles such as an electron and proton have their unique unchangeable *definite* mass.

So quantum mechanics contradicting physical reality by manipulating originally-unchangeable particle's mass is intrinsically **useless** with **No** ability to predict any new physical values based on real partciles.

Each time we observe some new physical phenomena of materials, quantum mechanics just forces us to **fabricate** new artificial *pseudo*-particle models and **manipulate** their nonphysical parameters such as fake electron's effective mass, instead of using real electrons with definite unchangeable mass.

Quantum mechanics can only roughly express the relation between energy and pseudo-momentum as a nonphysical band (= band theory can **Not** specify each particle's **position** ! ) of quasi-electron with **unreal** (= effective, this p.3 ) mass which tells us **nothing** about *true* mechanism of how exactly **real** electrons and nuclei interact with each other and cause various physical phenomena inside materials.

All materials can be roughly classified into three groups: conductor (= through which electron current can easily flow ), insulator (= electron current cannot flow ) and semi-conductor (= electric current conductance lies between conductor and insulator ).

Quantum mechanics describes this macroscopically-observable electric conductance using only **two** nonphysical linear bands (= of course, these **non**physical bands themselves can**not** be seen ) which include **No** real electron picture.

The upper band is called "conduction band" where electrons can flow as electric current, and the lower band is called "valence band" where electrons are tightly bound to their nearest nuclei, causing no electric current (= How exactly electrons are actually moving and interacting in each band is **unknown** forever as long as we embrace quantum mechanics ).

When the energy band-gap between these conduction and valence bands is wide ( or narrow ), electrons cannot ( or can ) move up to conduction band or flow as electric current.

The point is energy levels of these bands and their energy gap between conduction and balence bands have to be experimentally determined after measuring electric conductance of each material.

It is **Not** that quantum mechanical band model itself can 'predict' new energy gap or state of unknown material. Instead, after experimentally measuring electric current of materials, physicists **artificially** adjust (= manipulate ) and determine the energy band-gap *parameter* of each material to fit experimental results.

Therefore, quantum mechanics and its band model can actually do **nothing** about 'predicting' new physical values, instead, it just "**adjusts**" free parameters such as band-gap energy to experimental results. ← There is **No** harm in forgetting this meaningless quantum mechanical theory.

Topological insulator is a composite material that behaves as an insulator in its interior but whose surface behaves as a conductor.

This exotic topological material got Nobel physics prize in 2016, but it still has No practical application ( using quantum mechanics ).

Because quantum mechanics tries to aim at illusory energy-efficiency utilizing unreal quasiparticles allegedly popping up (= of course, these *ghost*-like quasiparticles are directly **undetectable** ) inside topological insulator.

All research papers on this topological insulator use only *ambiguous* hackneyed phrase "**potential** ( like seen in this abstract )". ← These indecisive expression in the media means there is still **No** practical application of topological material allegedly containing fictitious quasiparticles.

How does quantum mechanics describe physical mechanism (= conductor only on the surface ) of topological insulator ?

According to quantum mechanics, the upper conduction band has fictitious positive electron's **effective** mass and the lower valence band has unrealistic negative effective mass.

Physicists claim topological insulator's band has an imaginary 'point of intersection' between these two bands of positive and negative effective masses.

So this "middle point" indicates the existence of **fictitious** zero-mass fermion ( this p.20 ) which is also an *unreal* quasiparticle. ← this quantum mechanical explanation based on **unreal** quasiparticles is **far** from "*true* mechanism" inside topological insulator.

Energy efficient solar cell is indispensable for stopping global warming ( if it was real ). To do so, we need to elucidate *true* physical mechanism inside solar cell.

Quantum mechanics says an electron in valence band absorbing a photon (= a particle of light ? ) is excited and moved up to conduction band in solar cell.

But, first of all, a real electron cannot interact with (= absorb or emit ) a real photon, so if electromagnetic wave is not light wave but a photon particle, this photon must be **unreal** "*virtual* photon" with unphysical imaginary mass.

After absorbing this imaginary photon, quantum mechanics says the electron interacts with the energy of a "phonon" which is one of unreal quasiparticles representing thermal atomic vibration of material.

↑ So, quantum mechanics can **Not** describe actual atomic motion or vibration inside material using real particles such as electrons and nuclei, instead, it has to rely on **fictitious** *quasiparticle* model ( atomic vibration → phonon quasiparticle ) even now. ← Quantum mechanics is intrinsically **unable** to describe real physical mechanism based on real particles.

And then, an excited electron into conduction band and a hole (= created by excited electron ) left in valence band are said to bind each other to form another quasiparticle called exciton ( this p.7, this p.2 ).

Contrary to the media's sensational narration, all these **fictitious** quasiparticles such as exciton and phonon are expressed just as **non**physical, *abstract* math symbols with **No** physical figure ( quasiparticle = a^{†}, b^{†}, c^{†} ? .. this p.8 ) whose too simple interaction equation tells us **nothing** about detailed physical mechanism of how real electrons have to form unreal quasiparticles inside solar cell ( this p.2 ).

This unreal quasiparticle exciton is also supposed to have its **fake** (= effective ) mass which is a freely **changeable** value different from true electron's definite mass.

All other quasiparticle's pseudo-parameters are also freely-adjustable ( this p.6 ) meaningless physical values in predicting some actual values or phenomena.

And quantum mechanics says this unreal exciton quasiparticle decomposes into other quasiparticle called polaron ( this p.3, this p.2 ) which pseudo-polaron-quasiparticle just represents some state where an electron inside solid interacts with other electrically-polarized crystal atoms or nuclei.

↑ Again, quantum mechanics **refuses** to describe interaction between electron and other atoms inside solar cell using real particles, instead, it always has to rely on **unreal** quasiparticle model even now and forever. ← Quantum mechanics is intrinsically an unscientific **dead** theory which has **nothing** to do with real objects.

This polaron quasiparticle is also supposed to have its **fake** effective mass (= freely-adjustable parameter, so meaningless for predicting new physical values, this p.8 ).

↑ It is **imposssible** to know true underlying atomic and (**real**) electrons' behavior inside solar cell under the current dead atomic theory. ← How can we realize a "**miracle** energy-efficient solar cell" satisfying the demanding Green-new-deal ? ← Impossible dream forever !

You might have often heard the media's hackneyed phrases "modern computer's transistors wouldn't have been realized without quantum mechanical band theory." ← This is a complete **lie**.

As I said, quantum mechanical band theory replaced actual many-electron behavior or reactions by "one-*pseudo*-electron" and unreal quasi-particle model with **fake** (= effective ) mass which is freely-adjustable (= contradicting real particle's definite mass ) to artificially fit observed phenomena.

So, the quantum mechanical band theory based on unreal concepts has **No** ability to predict true transistor's mechanism of how real electrons are actually moving, responding and interacting with each other when a computer is running.

Semiconductos used in modern computer's transistors were invented by researchers' persistent efforts, long experience and "trial and error" approach where existing quantum mechanical theory was completely useless for developing or predicting new transistors.

Transistors and LED consist of two types of semiconductors (= p and n ) including different impurity atoms.

These different semiconductors have different band energies (= heights of conduction or valence band energies are different between different p- and n- type semiconductors ).

Each band is supposed to contain different "one-*pseudo*-electron" and quasi-particle model with **fake** effective mass (= freely-changeable, different from true electron's unchangeable mass, and their band pseudo-energy gap is also freely-adjustable meaningless parameter ).

This quantum mechanical band model intrinsically can **never** explain or predict real electron's interaction inside computer transistor due to its unphysical quasi-particle and effective mass model, as seen in other topological insulator and solar cells.

Depending on components and the magnitude of voltage applied to these transistors, they just *artificially* **change** and manipulate the energy levels of each semiconductor's conduction and valence bands ( by which electron's fake effective mass is also manipulated ) after experimentally measuring the change of electric conductivity depending on applied voltage ( this p.19, this p.156 ).

↑ Quantum mechanics is **helpless**, it cannot 'predict' how each band energy changes responding to applied voltage in transistors in advance.

So it is **Not** that quantum mechanical band model contributed to developing semiconductors for modern PC transitors, but that **after** physicists invented practical semiconductors by "trial and error" approach, they artificially **adjusted** fictitious quantum mechanical band model *parameters* such as fake electron's effective mass and band energy to fit observed semiconductor phenomena.

Developing useful transistor's semiconductor was the first. → *Fabricating* quantum mechanical band model with fake quasi-particle and effective mass was **later**.

← Quantum mechanics has **nothing** to do with modern computers and smartphones.

Superconductivity is a physical property observed in certain materials where electrical resistance vanished and magnetic flux fields are expelled.

Quantum mechanical BCS theory got Nobel prize in 1972 by allegedly explaining physical mechanism of how this superconductor occurs.

How could weird quantum mechanics describe superconductor ?

BCS theory claims **unreal** quasiparticle called "virtual phonons" unrealistically bind two repulsive electrons and form **fictitious** Cooper pair ( this p.9 ), which is said to condense into the lowest superconducting band-energy state called Bose-Einstein condensate.

But it's **impossible** for two negative electrons to attract each other disobeying Coulomb repulsion between electrons.

This **unreal** virtual *phonon* model is supposed to approximately represent "vibration of many positive nuclei or atoms" which appear to attract a pair of electrons via **fictitious** quasiparticle phonons.

As you see, quantum mechanics just **replaced** interactions caused by **real** electrons and nuclei by **fictitious** *quasi-particle* model. ← Because today's quantum mechanics intrinsically can**not** deal with complicated **many**-electron behavior inside material using real particles and real forces, so completely **useless** atomic theory as a tool for other applied science.

And quantum mechanics says this Cooper pair can break into another **unreal** *quasiparticle* called Bogoliubov quasiparticle ( this p.9 ).

These phonon quasiparticles and Cooper pair can be expressed only as abstract, **non**physical math symbols which tell us **nothing** about true detailed mechanism of what is actually happening inside supercondutor using real electron interaction.

We have to **discard** today's quantum mechanical **unreal** quasiparticle concept and nonphysical band model which just artificially fabricate and manipulate quasi-electron's fake effective mass to fit experimental results = hence, useless for 'predicting' new actual physical phenomena.

Otherwise,
we can **never** clarify *true* underlying atomic behavior and mechanism using real physical objects or electrons' interaction. ← Using fictional quantum mechanical concepts in other applied science such as medicine and nano-technology is **impossible** forever (= probably, quantum mechanical unreal *quasi-particle* model will be helpless in drug development ).

**Unfeasible** Green new deal lacking technological innovation due to today's useless basic atomic theory has become just a pie-in-the-sky "political tool" like other fake science for outdated academia colluding with corporations to get taxpayers' money, **pretending** to be "real science".

The current schools and meaninglessly-expensive educational facilities were reduced to a mere hotbed of harmful viruses, = useless except for indoctrinating students with **superstition** called "fake science".

Actually physics professors are obsessed only with killing time by using their pseudo-science such as extra-dimensions as pseudo-political tools. ← Our science technology will **Never** progress if we **blindly** continue to believe in this "*superstitious* academia". = Deadly diseases won't be cured, either.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(T-1) ↓ Unphysical reason = quasiparticle, time symmetry *

Coronavirus reinfections raise the possibility that ongoing vaccine development for acquiring herd immunity is doomed to **fail**.

We need to find other treatments for damaging viruses as soon as possible.

But the current **outdated** "science" is completely **helpless** except for protecting academia's old vested interests at the *sacrifice* of students.

Because the current mainstream *science* = quantum mechanics, dominant *pseudo*-atomic theory is **far** from clarifying actual physical phenomena.

The current basic physics **refuses** to use real physical objects as a tool to unravel true underlying mechanism.

As long as we blindly embrace the current **fictional** quantum mechanics as an absolute "science", we could **never** find a true cure or develop effective drugs for deadly diseases and viruses.

Here are some typical examples of us worshiping quantum mechanical *falsehood* even in the highest ranking academia. Nobel prize physics in 2016 was awarded to exotic matter called "topological insulator".

Getting the most prestigious Nobel prize means this "topological material" has actually improved our daily life or cured some diseases ? Unfortunately, this exotic matter did **nothing**. It is still ( and forever ) an **impractical** matter.

Nobel committee used **vague** phrases " opened the door on an **unknown** world where matter can assume *strange* states ? .. Many people are *hopeful* of **future** applications ?" ← so, still **No** practical application.

"*Topology*" is originally the branch of mathematics concerned with abstract doughnut shape, **Not** a physical entity.

In physics, topological insulator is used just as a general name for some "composite material" that behaves as an insulator in its interior but whose surface contains **conducting** states. ← That's all. **No** more detailed physical meaning or explanation.

Topological insulator is often said to have the "*potential* (= **Not** realized yet )" to be an "energy-efficient device" in the **future**. ← What can cause this "energy-efficiency" ?

Surprisingly, quantum mechanics says fictional "massless quasiparticle" may cause this strange "energy-efficiency" (= just an unsubstantial theory, **No** experimental proof ), because they say "**massless** particle" would travel faster with less energy loss, if it really existed. ← Of course, we can**not** see such a **fictional** ghost-like *quasi*-particle.

So the present only atomic theory = quantum mechanics can **Not** explain any actually-happening physical phenomena or its underlying mechanism using real particles or objects. ← The current "science" intentionally **avoids** physical "reality".

Instead, quantum mechanics has to rely on unreal (= unseen, intangible due to "**non**existent" ) quasiparticle model which *pseudo*-particles allegedly have **fake** mass (= called "effective mass" ) and charge to explain macroscopic phenomena.

It means even if we continue to use this unrealistic quantum mechanics, underlying atomic behavior and true mechanism will be **unknown** *forever*, because this mainstream "science" firmly **forbids** us from using real particles as basic atomic tool to describe actual many-particle physical phenomena.

Schrödinger equation = fundamental calculation tool of quantum mechanics can **neither** distinguish different individual electrons nor handle multi-electron materials in a practical and realistic way. ← Completely **useless** equation as an atomic tool.

Therefore, the present physics has to treat any many-electron materials as a **single** *pseudo*-electron model called band theory where a fictitious quasi-electron with fake (= effective this p.5 ) mass (= which could even be unreal negative mass ) is expressed as **non**physical linear bands including fictitious quasi-momentum (= instead of real particle's motion ) and pseudo-potential energy ( this p.2 ).

The media repeatedly emphasizes this topological insulator would be "robust" because it is protected by **non**physical thing called "*time reversal* **symmetry**". ← What the heck is this "time symmetry" ?

This "time reversal symmetry" is just an *artificially*-introduced, **meaningless** concept which has **nothing** to do with our real world. ← So, quantum mechanics losing touch with reality can **Not** give any logical reason why topological insulator could be "robust" in the "imaginary" future.

"Time reversal" is a kind of "**unrealistic** situation" where clock time is literally reversed using fictional "*time machine*" and each particle starts to move or spin in the **opposite** direction like in Alice's wonderland.

Quantum mechanics insists illusory quasiparticles called "massless Dirac, Weyl, Majorana fermions" with the opposite spins are moving in the opposite directions on the surface of topological insulator ( this p.9 ). ← Of course, we can**not** directly see these fictional quasi-particles. These are just "imagination".

All **real** particles such as electrons, protons and nuclei inside material **have** their peculiar definite mass, so these uncanny **massless** *quasiparticles* allegedly popping up on the surface of topological insulator are purely **illusionary** objects.

This quasiparticle's *imaginary* motion in two opposite directions allegedly possessing unphysical spins (= represented just as two arrows with **No** physical shape ) are expressed as abstract ad-hoc band model which tells us nothing about what real shape each particle has or how they are actually moving inside material.

If the clock time (= t ) could be reversed in imaginary world, the direction of motion (= momentum and spin ) of this **fictitious** quasiparticle should also change.

So massless quasiparticle with up (or down ) spin moving rightward (or leftward ) should change into a particle with down (or up ) spin moving leftward (or rightward ) under this "imaginary" time reversal. ← The initial state is supposed to contain quasiparticles with both right- and leftward motions, up and down spins, hence, the whole state is **un**changed under time revsersal, which they call "*time reversal* symmetry ( this p.7 )".

Though physicists argue this **non**physical "time reversal symmetry" is the **only** reason for "robust" topological insulator (← ? ), this logic is *nonsense*, telling us **nothing** about *real* physical reason or concrete mechanism of what exactly causes conducting surface of topological insulator, **covered** up by *fictional* quasi-particles.

This time reversal and quasiparticle model are just **illusory** concepts existing only inside theoretical physicists' *heads*, Not in the real world.

Physicists needed to **make up** *fictitious* concepts of unreal massless quasiparticles and artificial *nonsense* rule (= time reversal symmetry ) just to explain special conductivity of material (= actually irrelevant to unreal quasiparticle ) in the current irrational mainstream quantum "science".

Furthermore, they recklessly try to use this **illogical** topological insulator allegedly consisting of *fictitious* quasiparticle for pie-in-the-sky quantum computer. ← How can fictitious *ghost*-like quasi-particles be applied to a practical sophisticated computer ? ← **Impossible** !

Recently, the media started to sensationalize new crystal called "*time crystal* (= time travel ? )" which was first proposed by **Nobel** prize winner Frank Wilczek.

When time crystals ( or ions ) are oscillated at a certain frequency by some external stimulus ( such as laser ), time crystals are supposed to respond and faintly *ocsillate* with a **different** frequency or period from the external oscillation.

That's all. **Nothing** mysterious. This time crystal just "faintly oscillating at a *peculiar* frequency" is completely **useless** with No practical application ( this 5th last paragraph ) yet.

So the media and academia seem to try to use the name of prestigious "Nobel prize" in order just to attract public attention and make intrinsically-**useless** time crystal "**look**" meaningful (even by exploiting **irrelevant** fictional time travel, this 1st sentence ).

What causes this time crystal ? Again, quantum mechanics tries to explain this faint oscillation of time crystal as the result of **non**physical "time symmetry breaking" **without** showing any more detailed realistic mechanism. ← *nonsense* theory.

Actually, the original paper of Nobel laureate Frank (= first advocator of still-useless time crystal ) just mentioned **non**physical abstract concept (= "time reversal symmetry, this p.2 left )" with **No** detailed real physical mechanism behind time crystal.

And Frank **un**scientifically tries to **connect** this time crystal to irrelevant **fictional** extra-dimensions. ← Like in this way, the current "mainstream basic science" has pursued only **meaningless** *imaginary* concepts since its foundation 100 years ago.

Even in the latest research on this time crystal, physicists try to explain helium-3 faint magnetic oscillation using **unreal** quasiparticle model. ← *nonsense*.

As long as quantum mechanics relies on **fictitious** quasi-particle or nonphysical fabricated concept = symmetry, true physical mechanism will **never** be clarified covered up under fictitious concepts.

Energy-efficient solar cell is crucial for the so-called "*Green-new-deal*" to evolve from the current radical **crazy** impossible dream into some realistic one.

But the basic atomic theory = quantum mechanics always tries to explain the underlying mechanism of solar cell using **unreal** quasiparticle exciton model with **fake** (= effective ) mass ( this p.4, this p.3 ) which tells us **nothing** about detailed *real* mechanism of what's going on inside solar cell.

Hence, ironically, the current mainstream "**science**" worshiped by greeners makes Green-new-deal an *useless* radical **impossible** dream, forever.

Green-politicians intentionally **ignore** the fact that **colder** weather could **increase** more *victims* of coronavirus and damage economy next winter = far earlier than imaginary warmer future based on dubious data of climate change whose technology makes **No** progress due to the current fictional "science", as I said.

Actually, the recent world's weather is not so hot as the media, "scientists" and Greta make a big fuss about it.

If "scientists" *brainwashing* people with **unreal** extra-dimenions **pull** the strings behind presidential candidates, we would be forced into the world of more "darkness" and ignorance where only science fiction dominates, pretending to be "science".

See this week physics is still useless.

*(S-1) ↓ Quantum mechanics uses unreal * *equation*

Quantum mechanical Schrödinger equation has No ability to describe reality.

See this week physics is still useless.

See previous version of criticizing top journals.

2020/8/21 updated. Feel free to link to this site.