Useless quantum mechanics needs overhyped science news.

Top

(Fig.1)  Quantum mechanics obstructing science needs fictional targets and hyped news

Quantum computer proved to be just an overhyped pseudo-science.

The 2nd, 3rd, 5th paragraphs of this hyped and reality news (8/25/2024) say

"However, he cautioned against overhyping their capabilities (of the hopeless quantum computer ):"  ← true.

"One of the most promising applications of quantum computing lies in the realm of materials science and chemistry."  ← This sentence is "overhyping" this article itself mentioned.

"while we are enhancing the number of qubits is a very big engineering challenge."  ← Quantum computer is far from reality.

Fictional quasiparticle exciton is useless for the hyped information storage technology.

The 1st, 2nd, 9th paragraphs of this hyped news (8/25/2024) say

"uncovered details about the formation and behavior of.. excitons (= fictional quasiparticle model consisting of an transiently-excited electron and a hole )"

"Their work helps establish a picture of the complex relationship between the optical and magnetic properties of these materials,.. that could one day (= just speculation, still useless ) lead to brand-new technologies based on magnetism, such as information storage"  ← hype.

"In RIXS, the X-ray photons hit the electrons in the material and scatter off in many directions"  ← This research just applied X-ray to material, Not making any technology.

Impractical research based on fictional artificial (quantum quasiparticle) model.

This research paper on fictional exciton quasiparticle ↓

p.1-abstract just talks about (fictional) exciton quasiparticle with No mention of any practical application nor information storage (= so useless research ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.3-Fig.2~p.4-Fig.3 just imagined fictional quasiparticle models such as exciton and magnon only from X ray scattered by the material at extremely low temperature 40K, which is impractical (= unavailable at room temperature ).

This p.4-2nd-paragraph Reviewer #3 says
"The authors employed a damped harmonic oscillator model to fit magnons... These chosen fitting methods and model parameters introduce inherent uncertainties into the analysis"  ← This research relied on artificially-chosen unphysical model and parameters with No quantum mechanical prediction.

Fictional quasiparticle's technological application hype.

The 1st paragraph of this hyped news (8/25/2024) says

"that showed Cooper pairs display wave-like distribution in Kagome metals. The finding will (= just speculation, still useless ) enable new technological applications such as superconducting diodes"  ← hyped fictional application, again

This research paper's abstract talks only about (fictional) quasiparticle interference based on observation by scanning tunneling microscope with No mention of any technological application (= so useless fictional quasiparticle research, again ), contrary to the hyped news.

This p.4-p.5 shows just nonphysical math operators (of fictional quasiparticle ) with No real particle picture (and No quantum mechanical prediction because of fitting parameters ), contrary to the misleadingly-colorful picture of the news.

↑ As seen here, unphysical quantum mechanical mainstream quasiparticle model hampers today's technology, which inconvenient truth has been covered up by an incredible amount of overhyped news with "fictional application".

Fictional quasiparticle "may" be useful for quantum computer someday ?  ← No.

The 1st paragraph of this hyped news (8/25/2024) says

"scientists.. at the University of California, Riverside, has developed a new superconductor material that could potentially (= just speculation, still useless ) be used in quantum computing and be a candidate "topological superconductor."

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract made No mention of quantum computer, so useless research (= hyped quantum computers are deadend ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.2-Fig.1 ~ p.4-Fig.3 just measured electric conductance (= dI/dV ) of some material at very low temperature.

This research's supplementary material's p.4~p.5 shows the fictional quasiparticle equation model with artificially-chosen fitting parameters with No quantum mechanical prediction.

We are still watching (fictional) quantum mechanical parallel worlds ?

There is a rumor that body doubles were used for the recent Xi Jinping ( body-double, real ) and Kamala Harris.  ← How long do we have to see fictional quantum parallel worlds in ( today's fake mainstream ) science and daily life ?

 

Today's science stops by unphysical quantum mechanical quasiparticle model

The 8th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"At low temperatures, excitons (= unreal quasiparticle model ) could (= just speculation ) form a new type of neutral superfluid that could be used to create.. devices for quantum computing."  ← hype.

↑ This research paper ( this ↓ ).

p.1-abstract made No mention of ( hyped ) quantum computer nor any practical application (= so useless research ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.4~p.18 described the fictional exciton quasiparticle as nonphysical math symbol with No shape, contrary to the media's misleadingly colorful particle picture ( this middle ).

↑ And this research is just about (fictional) quantum mechanical theory with No experimental realization, so No practical use.

Deadend quantum computing is fake target for impractical quantum mechanical quasiparticle model.

The 1st, 5th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"A recent study led by University of Minnesota.. provides fundamental insight into how light, electrons, and crystal vibrations interact in materials. The research has implications for.. quantum information processing"  ← hype.

"By manipulating the properties of hyperbolic polaritons (= unreal quasiparticle model ), we can look to unlock new applications.. such as polariton qubits.. for a compact quantum computer"  ← hype, again.

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract made No mention of the (hyped) quantum computer nor qubit (= quantum computer is irrelevant to this research ).

p.10-right-conclusions and outlook just says "Polaritonic loss remains an outstanding issue and should be addressed for practical applications",  ← No mention of quantum computing or information, contrary to the hyped news.

↑ As shown here, the deadend quantum computer is often used as fictional target for overhyped news to explain or exaggerate useless quantum mechanical (quasiparticle) model.

Majorana quasiparticle is just fiction, useless for quantum computing.

The 3rd paragraphs of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"MZM (= Majorana zero mode ) is a zero-energy topologically nontrivial (fictional) quasiparticle in a superconductor,.. allowing for inequivalent braiding... making them an ideal platform for robust fault-tolerant quantum computation."

hype.  Even one quantum computer's bit or qubit has Not been realized in the fictional Majorana-quasiparticle-based quantum computer, which is unrealized forever.

↑ This research paper's abstract made No mention of quantum computing (or qubits ) nor any practical use, so completely useless unphysical research, contrary to the hyped news.

This-middle complete toolbox claims zero-bias (electric) conductance as the sign of fictitious (unseen) Majorana quasiparticle that cannot be isolated nor used for any practical purpose such as computers.

Quantum mechanical unphysical spin craves quantum computer as fake target.

The 3rd, 10th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"topological quantum magnetism,... artificial material using atomic manipulation with scanning tunneling microscopy"

"these exotic excitations can help us overcome some of the most pressing challenges of currently available qubits"

Quantum computer or qubits are used as fake target for useless quantum mechanical model such as spin and quasiparticle.

This research paper ( this ↓ ).

p.1-abstract did Not mention any practical application nor qubit (= so useless spin research that is irrelevant to quantum computer's qubit ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.2-Fig.1 shows the spin-polarized tip (= spin is unreal, just an electron's orbital motion ) of STM (= scanning tunnel microscope ) was used to manipulate the material's magnetic state.

p.3-(1) just shows nonphysical math equation (= lacking real atomic picture ) of artificially chosen fictitious spin exchange energy parameters with No quantum mechanical prediction (= so No evidence of spin )

p.6-lower-(2) are just nonphysical abstract math equations (= f is an unreal pseudo-fermion ) with No concrete (fictional) spin picture, contrary to the media's misleadingly-colorful fake spin picture.

p.9-last-paragraph says "(fictional) quasiparticles in artificial spin structures"

Today's physics pursues illusory 'graviton'.

The present mainstream (paradoxical) physics pursues only fictional concepts such as gravitons (= unreal virtual particles allegedly mediating gravitational force,  9/1/2024 ).

↑ This unphysical (virtual) graviton is said to escape from black hole (= whose event horizon's time stops, so gravitons' motion must stop, though ) to exert gravity, which is clearly paradox and unreal.

↑ Actually, this unphysical paradoxical graviton is expressed as nonphysical math symbol with No real particle shape ( this p.2-right-1st-paragraph ), contrary to the media's misleadingly colorful picture.

Quantum internet is far from reality

The 4th-paragraph of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"For their prototype network, the Qunnect researchers used a leased 34-kilometer-long fiber circuit (= too short distance to be practical internet )... fidelity of 99% (= still 1% error ) for entangled photon pairs transmitted at a rate of about 20,000 per second."

↑ Despite longtime researches, physicists can send only 20000 photons (= just 20000 bits ) per second over only 34km with still errors, which is far from a practical internet.

A practical internet must be able to send more than megabits ( this challenges of QKD ) over far longer distance (= across the world ) with No errors, which pie-in-the-sky quantum internet is impossible to realize forever.

Quantum computer advantage turned out to be fake.

The 2nd-last and last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"Despite the limitations of current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices (= today's quantum computers are too error-prone to show quantum advantage ), the team is able to measure topological state dynamics (= No mention of practical use ).. thanks to.. error mitigation (= Not legitimate error correction )"

"suggesting a potential route to achieving true quantum advantage in the future."  ← talking about uncertain future, so quantum advantage is still unrealized.

No practical use, No quantum advantage, only hypes remain.

This research paper ↓

p.3-(4), p.4-Fig.2 shows this research just manipulated a small number of qubits based on unphysical impractical quantum model lacking real particle picture.

p.3-right-2nd-last-paragraph says "we employ a suite of error mitigation techniques (RO = this is just classical computer's post-processing, this p.1-right-2nd-paragraph ).. a post-selection (PS) technique that discards results (= "cheating" picking up only convenient errorless results, this 6th-paragraph )"

p.10-left says this research used only less than 65 qubits (= one qubit can take only 0 or 1 state ), which is far from practical quantum computer requiring millions of qubits, so No quantum advantage ( this 4th-paragraph ).

Actually, this reviewer's comment p.2-1st-paragraph says
" I cannot agree with the authors that this method can realize quantum advantage (= authors showed optimistic prospect of quantum advantage in future ).. I do not recommend to accept this paper for publication in Nature Communications."

Entanglement for quantum sensing lacks reality.

The 2nd-last paragraph of this hyped news (9/1/2024) says

"The researchers are optimistic that by thus lowering the barrier to spin squeezing, their work will (= just speculation, still useless ) inspire new ways for... portable sensors, "

This research paper (p.10~p.15 method ) shows this research is just about pie-in-the-sky theory with No experimental realization.

Quantum mechanical unphysical model hampers molecular electronics.

The 3rd and last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"University of Illinois.. researchers report a unique strategy for controlling molecular conductance by using molecules with rigid backbones,.. they have demonstrated a straightforward "one-pot" method for synthesizing such molecules."

"This will (= uncertain future, still useless ) pave the way for the design of other functional materials and ultimately, for more reliable and efficient devices."  ← Hypes abound.

Quantum mechanical one-pseudo-electron DFT model hampers science and really-useful chemistry.

This research paper ↓

p.5-Fig.1a,c shows this research just synthesized a small molecule by ordinary macroscopic chemical experimental procedure (= without manipulating single atoms,  this p.5~ ), and measured its electric conductance by scanning tunnel microscope (= STM ) with No practical use.

p.20 used DFT methods describing the whole molecules as one-pseudo-electron model with artificial-chosen Grimme's empirical intermolecular potential (= No quantum mechanical prediction ), which lacks real particle picture (= contrary to the misleadingly-colorful picture ), and hampers science.

Quantum mechanical impractical model prevents clarifying protein ribosomes.

The 4th and last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

" they developed a cylindrical model called the ribosome environment mimicking model (REMM), "

"Further refinement of REMM is anticipated to enhance our understanding of protein conformations in living cells."  ← No mention of the detailed practical use.

Unphysical quantum mechanical one-pseudo-electron DFT and extremely-time-consuming molecular dynamics (= MD ) stop all the science.

This research paper (p.5-left-last-paragraph~p.5-right) used the extremely-time consuming molecular dynamics (= MD ) to simulate the only 250-ns molecular motion, which cannot simulate the much-longer (= minutes ~ hours ) biological or protein reactions, so useless.

This p.8 used one-pseudo-electron DFT model with B3LYP empirical functional which lacks real particle picture, and hampers science.

↑ As shown here, the unphysical quantum mechanical one-pseudo-electron DFT and extremely-time-consuming MD lacking real atomic shapes stop today's all applied science.

Unphysical quantum mechanics cannot explain chemistry behind cell energy molecule

Today's medicine and applied science stop progressing due to impractical molecular dynamics (= MD ) lacking real atomic shape.

The last paragraph of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"they were able to show that the changes in the angles were linked to larger changes in the enzyme's structure"  ← No mention of practical use, because this research clarified No real enzymatic behavior.

This research paper ↓

p.4-right-2nd-paragraph says "instead of running microsecond-long MD simulations, we limited the simulations to 10 ns"  ← Only too-short molecular motion can be simulated by the too time-consuming MD.

↑ today's only molecular simulating method called molecular dynamics (= MD ) lacking real atomic shapes is too time-consuming to simulate the much longer (= seconds ~ hours ) biological or enzymatic reactions, which hampers science.

Today's useless molecular simulations and machine-learning (= ML ) cannot discover drugs.

The 4th and 7th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/1/2024) say

"Researchers combined two approaches for screening potential new drugs. First, they used a database from the Library ... Then they combined the search with targeted docking simulations used to model the interaction between small molecules and their protein targets to find compounds of interest"

"And the accuracy will (= just speculation, still useless ) only improve, hopefully offering new hope to many people who have diseases with no known cure, including those with cancer"

This research paper ↓

p.4-right-3rd-paragraph says "Note that the precision, or positive predictive value, defined as PPV = TP/(TP + FP), where TP denotes the number of true-positive predictions and FP denotes the number of false positive predictions, "

p.5-Fig.5A shows this precision (= success rate of predicting binding molecules ) is less than only 40% even by using the latest ceSAR-cML combining multiple database, simulation and machine-learning methods, which low success rate can Not discover effective drugs.

AI makes our life inconvenient and unhappy due to useless quantum mechanics.

The recent video of meeting between China's Xi Jinping and US Sullivan seemed to use the artificial processing by "AI".

↑ Compare the contradiction between this (= 0:01~0:05, the US woman's hand did not move ) and this or this (= 0:01 ~ 0:05, the same woman's hand was moving, while Xi was speaking the same phrases in all those videos ).

↑ Whether "real" Xi Jinping was there or not is still unclear, but today's hyped useless AI is used only to restrict our freedom and make our life inconvenient (= instead of developing really-useful technology ) due to unphysical quantum mechanics.

 

Quasiparticle phonon laser is hopeless, irrelevant to hyped quantum computer.

The last paragraph of this hyped news (9/8/2024) says

"Phonon lasers (= sound wave ) could (= just speculation ) also have applications in material science, quantum computing"  ← hype, ← No progress from old Feynman's era.

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract says nothing about 'quantum computing', contrary to the above hyped news.

p.6-left shows the fictional phonon quasiparticle is expressed just as nonphysical math symbol with No real particle's shape, contrary to the media's misleadingly-colorful particle picture.

Despite decades of researches, (fictional) quasiparticle phonon laser is impractical.

The 2nd, 4th, 7th paragraphs of this or this news about the same phonon-laser research say

"For several decades, researchers have been creating “phonon lasers"

"Any small vibration of this bead created phonons (= sound wave )"

"Phonon lasers may require years of research and engineering before they match the usefulness of their optical counterparts."

↑ Despite decades of research, phonon laser is still useless, due to quantum mechanical unphysical quasiparticle model that just hampers science.

Quantum computer is used as fictional target for impractical quantum mechanical research

The 4th and last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/8/2024) say

"The 300,000 Rubidium atoms were cooled down to 100 nanokelvin.. and loaded into the optical trap forming an optical lattice,.. the ground state with an electron in the 5s orbital and the Rydberg state with an electron in the giant 29s orbital was generated by irradiating an ultrashort pulse laser.."

"which represents important progress to improve the fidelity of the two-qubit gate operation and to realize socially useful quantum computers in the future (= uncertain future, so still useless )"

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract says nothing about the (hyped) quantum computers nor any practical use, so this is useless research just about cold excited atoms trapped in laser.

Quantum entanglement is fiction, just hampering science.

The 5-6th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/8/2024) say

"Without the crystal,.. We expect to observe an intensity (inverted) image of the object on the camera. However, in the presence of the crystal (= NLC = nonlinear crystal ), SPDC occurs, producing pairs of entangled photons."  ← so even without crystal allegedly emitting entangled photons, they could get images.  quantum entanglement is unnecessary.

"If only these pairs (= photons or lights ) are selected by a spectral filter,. after accumulation of many photons (= taking much time ),... The image of the object reappears"

Quantum entanglement is unnecessary, just a (classical) cheaper camera is far better.

This research paper ↓

p.3-right-2nd-paragraph says "However, one drawback is that the EMCCD camera used here require several hours to acquire the 106−107 frames needed to reconstruct the correlation images."  ← too time-consuming, useless camera (for capturing alleged entangled photons that just mean two correlated polarized lights irrelevant to superluminal action )

p.6-1st-paragraph mentions Its temperature is set to -60◦C.  ← cannot be used at room temperature (= useless 'fake entanglement' camera )

↑ Just taking a bad picture of a cat with low resolution needed expensive device (= needing cold temperature ) and extremely long time = several hours.

↑ We can take a far better picture of an object (= cat ) with a far cheaper ordinary camera far more quickly, so quantum entanglement is illusion, unnecessary, just hampering science.

Even Google's world's best quantum computer failed to correct errors.  ← Quantum computer is officially dead.

(Fig.Q)  Google error-prone 105-qubit quantum computer can express only one (logical) qubit that can take only 0 or 1 with high error rate, which is Not a computer nor able to calculate anything. ↓

Google 105-qubit quantum computer could express one (logical) qubit with still impractically-high error rate, which is useless, unable to calculate anything.

The 7th paragraph of this hyped news (9/8/2024 Google quantum AI ) says

"The distance-7 code, which involves 101 physical qubits, achieved an error rate of 0.143% per cycle of error correction, "  ← this means the error rate increased by 0.143% in each error correction (= error-worsening ) operation (= quantum error correction is impossible ).

The 3-4th, 6th paragraphs of another site say

"Quantum computers are even more prone to errors"

"To solve this, quantum computers can be made to group a number of physical qubits to act as a single "logical" qubit,"

"with both a 72 qubit processor and a 105 qubit processor, each acting as a single logical qubit.."

"researchers claimed an error rate of just 0.143 per cent per cycle... still high enough to cause problems with large calculations"  ← Even this latest quantum error rate is far worse than the practically-required error rate of 10-15 ( this 5th-paragraph )"

Even the world's best error correction quantum computer just increased errors by 0.143% per error correction operation that cannot decrease errors.  ← Quantum computer is dead, No progress.

↑ This Google research used the whole 101 (physical) qubits (out of 105-qubit quantum computer ) as one (fictitious) logical qubit (= when some qubits inside a logical qubit cause errors, these erroneous qubits can be corrected by compared with other intact qubits inside one logical qubit through majority vote, this p.4 ).

↑ Each logical qubit (= corresponding to classical computer's bit ) can take 0 or 1 state ( this 4th-paragraph ), so this research is just about only one qubit that cannot calculate anything.

This 3th and 6th paragraphs say
"using 101 physical (superconducting) qubits to encode 1 logical qubit. "
"Google is just scaling up a single logical qubit,"  ← Only this (fictitious) logical qubit consisting of multiple (superconducting) qubits can be used for calculation, so this Google research is about only one qubit that can take only 0 or 1 bit states with still high error rate, which is still Not a computer nor able to calculate anything.

This research paper ↓

p.2-Fig.1a shows one logical qubit (= which can take only 0 or 1 ) consists of 105 (physical) qubits.

p.2-Fig.1c blue line shows conducting 250 error correction cycles increased errors to more than 20% error rate (= 0.2 ) instead of decreasing errors, so quantum error correction (= or decreasing quantum computer's errors ) is impossible.

p.6-right-2nd-paragraph says "Even so, many challenges remain ahead of us..., achieving a 10−6 error rate would require a distance-27 logical qubit using 1457 physical qubits."  ← To reduce error rate from this research's 0.143% to 10-6, each logical qubit must consist of 1457 (physical) qubits (instead of 105 qubits ), which qubit number is still out of reach of today's (error-prone) quantum computer.

↑ Even one practical (logical) qubit cannot be realized (= even one bit 0 or 1 with no errors cannot be realized ), which means quantum computer research is already dead.

Energy-efficient data storage hype.

The 4th paragraph of this hyped news (9/8/2024) says

"This research.. helps us understand how to control the magnetic properties of materials.., which could (= just speculation ) lead to advancements in technology, such as more efficient electronics,.. data storage,.. computing devices that consume less energy."  ← hype.

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract says nothing about any practical application such as energy-efficient data storage (= so useless research ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.4-1st-paragraph-lower says "if present, is lower than 10K. Such a stronger contrast at lower temperatures of spin fluctuations between bulk and few layers is suggestive of different magnetic phases between 3D and 2D NiPS3. "

p.11 used NV-center in diamond and raman (= light ) measurement to vaguely estimate magnetic fluctuation (= not spin ) change

p.13~14 shows just nonphysical spin model (= No shape ) whose exchange coupling parameters J were artificially chosen to fit experiment with No quantum mechanical prediction ( this p.8-Table.2 ).  ← so No evidence of quantum spin nor (unphysical) exchange energy.

↑ They just vaguely estimated magnetic fluctuation change of the material (= using unphysical useless model ) at temperature lower than room temperature (= so Not energy-efficient at all ) with No practical use, which needs overhyped fake news such as "energy-efficient data storage device".

General relativity pursues fantasy warp drive with negative mass.

The 7th. 12th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/8/2024) say

"A warp drive is a hypothetical form of technology that compresses the space in front of a starship and expands it behind."

"While mathematically, one can describe material with negative energies, almost everything we know appears to have a positive energy"

↑ Today's mainstream physics pursues only fictional warp drive with paradoxical negative mass (= negative energy, this 7th-paragraph ).

Nuclear-reactor technology is deadend due to unphysical quantum mechanical one-pseudo-electron DFT, MD model

The 1st, 5th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/8/2024) say

"researchers have documented for the first time the unique chemistry dynamics and structure of high-temperature liquid uranium trichloride (UCl3) salt, a potential (= still unrealized ) nuclear fuel source "

"The research,.. the University of South Carolina, used a combination of computational approaches and.. Neutron Source,.. to study the chemical bonding and atomic dynamics of UCl3.."

This research paper's p.7-1st-paragraph used extremely time-consuming ab-initio molecular dynamics (= AIMD = only 100ps simulation ), one-pseudo-electron DFT model (= lacking real atomic picture ) with artificially-chosen pseudo-potential, Hubbard parameter U, empirical Grimme's D3 intermolecular energy functional.

↑ Free choice of various pseudo-potentials and parameters means No quantum mechanical prediction, and this unphysical shapeless quantum mechanism model just hampers technological development including nuclear energy.

Cancer research is deadend due to impractical time-consuming molecular dynamics based on shapeless atoms.

The 1st and last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/8/2024) say

" A recent study,.. which proposes the use of molecular "cages" (made of pseudopeptides) to selectively eliminate cancer cells in acidic microenvironments."

"These results will (= uncertain future, still unrealized ) help to understand and improve the design of these ionophores with potential therapeutic applications in cancer treatment,"

This research paper ↓

p.10-11 used extremely time-consuming molecular dynamics, which could simulate only ~ 150ns change of the above pseudo-peptide cage (= chrolide-complex ) penetrating the lipid-bilayer membrane.

↑ This extremely-time-consuming molecular dynamics due to lack of real atomic shapes in unphysical quantum mechanics cannot simulate much-longer (= seconds ~ hours ) important biological reaction, so hampers technological development for curing cancers and biology.

 

Spin is unreal.  Spin current is useless. Only hypes are rampant.

The 1st and 2nd paragraphs of this hyped news (9/15/2024) say

"the group used a linearly polarized laser pulse.. to create the spin currents"  ← An electron is Not spinning, so spin current is just a slight temporary (useless) magnetic fluctuation by electron's orbit.

"Theory has suggested (= just speculation, still useless ) they could lead to electronic devices that run faster—they are also expected to be more efficient, reducing energy costs (= hype )."

No practical use, contrary to overhyped fake news.

This research paper ( this ↓ )

p.2-abstract says nothing about any practical application such as the dreamlike energy-efficient electronic device (= so useless spin research ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.3-Fig.1 shows they excited the material with laser light, and created transient magnetic fluctuation detected by probe light change (= unreal electron spin itself is unmeasurable ).

p.3-right-middle says "In this 200fs-long trace"  ← This transient magnetic fluctuation (= fake spin current ) is too short-lived to use for practical application.

p.5-right-29th-sentence~ says "However, the calculation overestimates the change of Pt moment, compared to the experiment."  ← some quantum mechanical calculation disagreed with experiment.

Deadend quantum computer is used as fake target for impractical quantum mechanical research.

The 2nd and last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/15/2024) say

"The emission direction of a photoelectron released by light relative to the remaining bound electron in the cleaved neutral hydrogen atom can be controlled by the time interval between two laser flashes"

"While it is too early to design a viable quantum computer based on this idea, it provides the fundamental physics insights for programming quantum information (= hype )"

This research paper p.1-abstract says nothing about the hyped quantum computer nor information, so useless research that just excited hydrogen atoms by laser light.

Quantum computer is used as a fake target-2.

The 3rd, 4th paragraphs of this hyped (9/15/2024) news say

"the group overlapped several laser beams to create a quasiperiodic pattern,.. When filling the resulting structure with ultracold atoms, cooled... to absolute zero, the atoms formed the Bose glass (= useless unphysical concept )."

"it can also help to advance quantum computing (= hype )," said Professor.. at the Cavendish Laboratory, "

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract says nothing about practical use nor quantum computing, contrary to the above overhyped news (= so deadend quantum computer is used as a fake target for impractical quantum mechanical research like this ).

p.2-right-2nd-paragraph says this research just trapped cold potassium atoms by laser light whose some potential pattern was called (impractical) Bose glass (= p.3-Fig.2 )

Microsoft-Quantinuum's just 12 qubits with failed error correction exposed today's hopeless quantum computing.

(Fig.M)  Microsoft/Quantinuum 56 ion qubits divided into only 12 or 4 logical qubits are still error-prone, Not a computer. ↓

Microsoft error-prone qubits are useless, deadend, still Not a computer.

The 2nd paragraph of this hyped news (= apart from deceptive hybrid computer,  9/15/2024) says

"Quantinuum's H2 machine, which now has 56 (ion) qubits... all 12 logical qubits were.. a cat state, or Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state... error rate of 0.0011 (= 0.11%, this error rate is bad, still far higher than practically-required error rate of 10-15, this p.1-abstract )"

↑ Today's quantum computer is useless, too error-prone to calculate anything, so they needed to prepare a (fictitious) logical qubit consisting of multiple physical qubits (= this research divided 56 ion qubits into 12 logical qubits ).

When a logical qubit is 0 bit state, all physical qubits composing one logical qubit also must take the same 0 state.  Errors of some physical qubits can be corrected by compared with other intact physical qubits inside a logical qubit based on majority vote ( this 5~6th-paragraphs ).

So this latest research's just 12 (logical) qubits (= each logical qubit can take only 0 or 1 state ) is useless, still Not a computer nor able to calculate anything.

They just tried to make all 12 qubits 0 or 1 state (= 000000000000 or 111111111111 ) without calculating anything, which useless simple qubit manipulation is called GHZ cat state.

They discarded erroneous results without error correction by illegitimate postselection.

Furthermore, there is a catch.  Even this Microsoft's latest 12 qubits could Not correct errors, instead, they just illegitimately discarded erroneous qubits postselectively ( this 5th-paragraph ).  ← Because operation of error correction itself increases errors, so all they could do was just discard (= ignore ) error results without error correction.

This 11th paragraph says "operations and calculations discarded due to errors that could not be corrected. This is still not low enough to enable the large number of operations needed for useful algorithms ( this 8th-paragraph )"  ← still useless, error-prone qubits.

Even just 4-qubit error correction was impossible.  Quantum computer was officially dead.

This research paper ↓

p.1-right-last-paragraph says "two faults may bring the system to an uncorrectable state. When an uncorrectable state is detected, our fault-tolerance procedure rejects (= discard ) the trial. This “postselection (= cheating, this 6th-paragraph )” means that more trials are needed.. The acceptance rates in our experiments are at least 50%"  ← about 50% results were discarded due to errors, so this research's actual error rates were about 50%, which was too bad, hopeless.

p.11-left-last-paragraph says "This is why we ran the four-qubit error correction experiment on H2. Early experiments with five rounds of error correction on 12 logical qubits.. have shown a potentially problematically high error rate 2%"  ← Error correction of just 12 qubits was impossible in this research.

p.11-Fig.13-(b) shows just 50 rounds of error correction operations on just 4 (logical) qubits (= p.8-Table-III) increased the error rate to more than 1%, even after they illegitimately discarded 80% of all results due to errors (= acceptance probability was only 0.2 or 20% ) without error correction.

As shown here, today's quantum error correction is completely useless, just increasing errors instead of decreasing errors even in very small numbers of qubits (= just 4 qubits ), even if they illegitimately discarded erroneous qubits postselectively without error correction.

Microsoft and many other media intentionally avoid mentioning "(illegitimate) postselection", because today's error-prone quantum computer can never reach final correct answers, if they discard erroneous results postselectively in large calculation.

This 19~20th-paragraphs say a future practical quantum computer will need 1000 ~ 100000 logical qubits consisting of more than millions of physical qubits, which is impossible to realize forever.

Illusory faster quantum computer's hype is endless.

The 4-5th paragraphs of this hyped news say (9/15/2024)

"Osaka University and Fujitsu say their new calculation method will (= just speculation, still useless ) enable quantum computers to perform calculations more quickly than supercomputers without having to significantly upscale their qubits.

"They say calculations would be possible using only 60,000 qubits (= still far from reality ) -- substantially less than the 1 million qubits that are believed to be required. They say it is theoretically (= just pie-in-the-sky theory with No experimental realization ) possible for a quantum computer to analyze superconducting materials in only about 10 hours compared to around five years for a supercomputer."

Just pie-in-the-sky theory with No experimental verification.

This (= p.29-last ) research paper ( this ↓ )

p.3-right-2nd-paragraph says "we focus on the scheme of the Adiabatic State Preparation (ASP) as a deterministic method to prepare the ground state"  ← This finding the lowest-energy ground state by adiabatic method as shown in D-Wave proved to be fake quantum computer (= there is a much faster classical computer's method ).

p.7-left-2nd-paragraph says " expanding the scope of runtime analysis to encompass a wider variety of classical methods is imperative. In this study, we concentrated on the DMRG and variational PEPS algorithms due to their simplicity in runtime analysis"  ← Only two (slower) classical methods such as DMRG (= p.6-left-3rd-paragraph ) and PEPS were considered in this research.

↑ There are much faster classical computer's methods for finding ground-state adiabatically, so this research did Not prove (future) quantum computer's advantage at all.

Spintronics is deadend, only hypes remain.

The 1st and 3rd paragraphs of this hyped news (9/15/2024) say

"group has designed a new complex material with emerging properties in the field of spintronics. This discovery, published in the journal Nature Materials, opens up a range of fresh possibilities (= still unrealized ) for the development of novel, more efficient and more advanced electronic devices, such as those that integrate magnetic memories into processors (= hype )."

"we studied the stacking of two layers of graphene and tungsten selenide (WSe2)... If the two layers are placed one on top of the other and rotated at a precise angle, a spin current (= just magnetic fluctuation ) is generated in a desired specific direction"

This research paper ( this ↓ )

p.1-abstract says nothing about the efficient magnetic memories or anything, contrary to the above hyped news.

p.4-Fig.2 conducted experiment at very low temperature of 100K (= cannot be used at room temperature, so this is a useless, energy-inefficient device )

p.10-16th-17th sentences say "the estimated values of ψ are about three times larger than the prediction."  ← Theoretical prediction disagreed with experimental results.

Today's science stops progressing by unphysical quantum mechanical DFT and MD.

The 1st-paragraph of this hyped news (9/15/2024) says

"(impractical) theory to shed light on the intricate processes involved in converting carbon dioxide (CO2) into valuable chemicals like ethylene and ethanol. This research holds significant promise (= still useless )"

This research paper ↓

p.9-DFT details tried to treat the whole molecules as one-pseudo-electron DFT model with artificially-chosen pseudo-potential and empirical DFT-D2 intermolecular energy functional.  ← No quantum mechanical prediction.

p.9-right-1st-paragraph used impractically-time-consuming ab-initio molecular dynamics (= MD ) that just simulated only 10ps motion of a small molecule, which cannot simulate much-longer (= seconds ~ hours ) important chemical or biological reactions.

So today's science stops progressing by impractical quantum mechanical DFT and MD.

 

Mobile quantum computer for cybersecurity is overhyped fake news.

Building (just) 32 qubits is still impossible,  a practical computer is far from reality.

The 2nd paragraph of this hyped news (9/22/2024,  or this 7~9th-sentences ) says

"MinIon, the first mobile variant of Oxford Ionics’ quantum computers,.. The first generation of the system will (= still unrealized now ) have (just) 32 high-fidelity qubits (= each qubit can take only 0 or 1 state, which is still Not a computer )"

↑ Even today's world best ion-qubit quantum computer (= still Not a computer ) has only 56 impractical qubits that are too error-prone to calculate anything (= at least millions of qubits will be necessary for practical use ).

Mobile quantum computer for cybersecurity is far from reality, which is just overhyped fake news.

Virtual quantum computer is Not a real quantum computer

The 2nd paragraph of this hyped news (9/22/2024) says

"QPerfect’s advanced MIMIQ virtual quantum computer ( this 3rd-paragraph )"  ← virtual quantum computer is Not a real quantum computer but a classical computer's simulation.

DNA quantum computer is just a pie-in-the-sky theory.

The 9th paragraph of this hyped news (9/22/2024) says

"Using physical approximations, the study theoretically demonstrated that ~"  ← This research ( this abstract ) just showed the (pie-in-the-sky) theory with No experimental realization.

Topological quantum computer based on (imaginary) Majorana quasiparticle with fractional charge is just fiction.

(Fig.T)   Fault-tolerant topological quantum computer based on non-existent quasiparticle is a fake target created for today's deadend physics.

Just pie-in-the-sky theory with No experimental realization

The 1st, 9-10th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/22/2024) say

"The topological quantum computer still exists only in theory (= just pie-in-the-sky theory ) but, if possible, would be (= just speculation) ..
However, it requires a special type of qubit (quantum bit) that has yet to be realized and manipulated."  ← even one qubit has Not been realized ( due to lack of reality ).

"Even though the only fundamental particles in the circuit are electrons, collectively they can behave as if the electron has been split in two"  ← impossible !

"The result is a so-called "Majorana fermion (= just fictional quasiparticle with fractional charge )".. but as yet not isolated experimentally. The finding is potentially important for.. (= just speculation, still useless )"

This research ( p.9~ ) is just about unphysical impractical theory without conducting experiments.

Fictional quantum mechanical quasiparticle model is useless, unable to clarify superconductor's pseudo-gap

The 1st paragraph of this hyped news (9/22/2024) says

"scientists have made a breakthrough in understanding the "pseudogap,".. The discovery, presented in Science, will (= still useless ) help scientists in their quest for room-temperature superconductivity, a holy grail of condensed matter physics that would (= speculation ) enable lossless power transmission, faster MRI machines (= hype )"

This research paper ( this ↓ )

p.1-abstract talks only about fictional quasiparticle model in superconductor's energy pseudo-gap ( this middle ), and says nothing about practical use (= so useless research ), contrary to the above hyped news.

↑ This research is just an imaginary theory (= No experiment was conducted ) about unphysical model lacking real particle picture.

Antiferromagnetic spintronics has No practical use.

The 5th, 9th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/22/2024) say

"chromium oxide with a dash of boron—could help herald the emergence of digital memory and processors that consume far less power, while potentially (= just speculation ) running even faster, than their modern-day counterparts"

"With NV microscopy, researchers can directly image the boundary magnetization (= detect just magnetization, Not unphysical spin ) and see the effects of the B-doping"

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract says nothing about practical use (= so the so-called spintronics is useless ), contrary to the above hyped news.

↑ This research just tried to measure very small magnetization change in doped antiferromagnets by measuring the energy levels of nitrogen-vacancy (= NV ) center in diamond (= very old technique just measuring vague magnetic field, Not a fictional spin ) with No practical use.

Hyped quantum computer cannot extract energy from 'empty space' like magic.

The 5-7th, 11th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/22/2024 ) say

"they always have some energy because of those tiny flickers of quantum field (= Not zero energy, so the phrase of empty space in the headline is untrue )"

"When Alice makes a measurement on her qubit, it both reveals information about the qubit’s fluctuations and slightly increases its energy ( this 10th-paragraph )."  ← The act of measurement increased (= injected ) energy (= No more zero energy )

"Then Alice calls Bob and communicates the details of the measurement (= ordinary classical communication was needed in meaningless teleportation )
Bob harvest the extra energy from his half of the qubit pair. Crucially, he then transfers that energy to a third qubit (= Not by quantum teleportation ) "

"that was more akin to a simulation rather than an experiment (= this research is just a mere simulation rather than experimental realization )"

↑ This research just injected, extracted and transferred real energy that was Not extracted from 'empty space (= contrary to the headline )', so Not a magical research. They used only 3 impractical IBM qubits (= one qubit can take only 0 or 1 state, this is Not a computer at all, this p.4-Fig.3 )

Overhyped quantum computer cannot simulate fluid dynamics in aerospace.

(Fig.H)   Hybrid quantum-classical computer for simulating fluid dynamics was just a classical computer, and the error-prone useless quantum computer was Not used.

Hybrid computer is just a classical computer.  Quantum computer is useless, unable to calculate anything.

The 1st, 2nd, 6th, 8th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/22/2024) say

"BQP, a startup.., today announced.. simulating Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The milestone was achieved using a hybrid quantum-classical solver"  ← this (deceptive) hybrid computer is Not a quantum computer but an ordinary classical computer.

"they estimated (= just guessed, No realization ) that large-scale CFD simulation of a jet engine can be achieved with only 30 logical qubits (= which mean the ideal non-existent errorless 30 qubits ) on a quantum computer, leading to better accuracy,"

"by simulating a non-linear time-dependent Partial Differential Equation (PDE) from 4 to all the way to 11 qubits"  ← this research used only 4 ~ 11 (ideal) qubits (= one qubit can take only 0 or 1 state ) that is still Not a quantum computer.

"BQP believes that BQPhy’s solver will (= just speculation, still unrealized ) allow CFD engineers to simulate a full aircraft (= hype )"

They ended up using classical computer's simulator of the ideal (= non-existent ) errorless 4 ~ 11 qubits.   Quantum computer was Not used after all, contrary to the headline.

This research paper ↓

p.2-right-4th-paragraph says "combines strengths of Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQA) and classical linear algebra."  ← This hybrid VQA is useless, depending on artificially-chosen input data.

p.4-Fig.3 shows almost all calculations must be performed by an ordinary classical computer, so quantum computer with a tiny number of qubits was useless (= they had to take extra trouble to change some process into one usable for the impractical quantum computer, which took more unnecessary time ).

p.4-right-2nd-paragraph about the process says "We have utilized IBM Qiskit AerSimulator (GPU-enabled)"  This research just conducted classical computer's (= GPU ) simulation of qubits instead of using real (impractical) quantum computers.  ← So No quantum computer was used after all even in quantum computer's PDE solver (= p.4-left.B ).

p.6-right-2nd-paragraph says "When the HQCFM presented in this research is run on an ideal quantum computer, this same problem could be tackled using only 30 qubits"  ← 'Ideal' means errorless 30 (logical) qubits (= like a classical computer's simulator ) that are impossible to achieve ( this p.3-1st~3rd-paragraphs ).

p.7-Fig.6 shows this research used only 4 ~ 11 (ideal, non-existent ) qubits on classical computer's simulator.

↑ It is impossible to achieve quantum computer's advantage by using hybrid quantum-classical computers, because the hybrid computer's calculation of data heavily relies on the classical computer ( this p.15-1st-paragraph ).

↑ If the ideal errorless quantum computer (= unrealized forever ) is available, the hybrid computer is unnecessary. so the quantum advantage by the hybrid computer is contradictory.

Fictional skyrmion quasiparticle is useless also for 'gesture recognition'.

The 7-8th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/22/2024) say

"they recorded simple hand gestures such a swipe left or right with Range-Doppler radar, employing two .. radar sensors. The radar data is then converted into corresponding voltages to be fed into the reservoir.."

"Two of the contacts supply the voltage, which causes the skyrmion (= fictional useless quasiparticle representing magnetic swirling ) to move within the triangle... These movements of the skyrmion enable us to deduce the movements that the radar system has recorded."

This research paper ↓

p.2-Fig.1 detected just magnetic fluctuation change (= fictional skyrmion quasiparticle itself was undetectable ) induced by input voltage through detecting light polarization change (= classical magneto-optical Kerr effect was used )

p.3-Fig.3 shows the error rates of about 20% (= accuracy is about 0.8 ) for distinguishing just four hand gesture patterns by two radar sensors and (fictional) skyrmion magnetic detection, data-trained (still-impractical) neural network system.  ← 20% error rate is too bad to be a practical hand gesture recognition system.

p.4-right-1st-paragraph says "the (fictional skyrmion) reservoir is competitive and can even exhibit superior performance compared to state-of-the-art software-based classification methods"  ← which means these software-based methods were bad, and does Not mean the fictional skyrmion quasiparticle (= just magnetic fluctuation ) may be useful for practical purpose.

↑ We can easily distinguish 4 different gestures by using 2 radar sensors (= 1 = one sensor detects,  2 = the other sensor detects,  3 = both sensors detect,  4 = neither sensors detects. ) with 100% accuracy, even without the expensive complicated magnetic (= skyrmion ) detecting system nor the error-prone (neural network) software.

So the (fictional) skyrmion quasiparticle is useless.

Today's science stops progressing by unphysical quantum mechanical DFT, MD model (9/22/2024)

(Fig.D)  Today's science stops progressing by unphysical quantum mechanical DFT (= density functional theory expressing material as one-pseudo-electron with No real atomic shapes ) and extremely-time-consuming molecular dynamics (= MD ) methods

Mechanism of photocatalysis remains unknown due to unphysical quantum mechanical density functional theory (= DFT ).

The last paragraph of this hyped news (9/22/2024) says

"EnT photocatalysis has a lot of potential and is attracting more attention, but EnT events still remain a largely unexplored area for computational chemistry"  ← mechanism is still Not clarified by (useless) quantum mechanics.

This research paper (p.9-left) used the unphysical one-pseudo-electron DFT with empirically-determined B3LYP-D3BJ exchange-correlation energy functional ( this p.2-4th-paragraph ) and artificially-chosen pseudo-potential.

No quantum mechanical prediction, and this unphysical quantum mechanical DFT model lacking real atomic shapes prevents clarifying real atomic mechanism forever.

Spintronics stalls by unphysical quantum mechanical spin and DFT model

The last paragraph of this hyped news (9/22/2024) says

"The results show that graphene-based heterostructures have great potential (= just speculation, still useless ) for the next generation of spintronic devices"

This research paper this

p.3-Fig.1 used ARPES (= old instrument with No practical use ) that just measured scattered direction of electrons excited by light.  ← fictional spin itself is undetectable.

p.9-right-theoretical calculation used one-pseudo-electron DFT model with unphysical plane wave (= lacking real atomic shape, hampering science ).

↑ This DFT used full-potential (= instead of pseudo-potential ) that must also artificially choose various free parameters such as atomic (Muffin-tin) radius and energy parameters ( this p.6-right-1st-paragraph chose muffin-tin radius, p.13-right-appendix-1st-paragraph chose energy parameters )  ← No quantum mechanical prediction.

Silk protein will never be useful for 'computing' due to impractical MD.

The last paragraph of this hyped news (9/22/2024) says

"This study represents the first step in controlled silk layering on functional electronic components. Key areas of future (= still useless now ) research..."

This research paper (p.8) conducted the extremely time-consuming molecular dynamical (= MD ) simulation of just 500ns motion of some silk molecules (this p.26 ) that is useless, unable to simulate much-longer important reaction, so hampering science.

Synthetic mini-motor is useless due to MD.

The 1st, 3rd paragraphs of this hyped news (9/22/2024) say

"Researchers.. have developed an artificial motor at the supramolecular level that can develop impressive power. This wind-up motor is a tiny ribbon made of special molecules"

"In the future (= still useless ), the new development could be used in nanorobots (= hype )"

Extremely-slow, easily-broken useless mini-motor, which cannot be simulated even by today's fastest molecular simulating method or molecular dynamics (= MD ).

This research paper ↓

p.3-Scheme 1 shows some peptide ribons and chemical reaction used.

p.6-Figure.2G shows this peptide's spinning speed (= extremely-slow, only one rotation per 16 minutes, p.9-Fig.3C ) decreases just after several rotations (= 25 minutes, rpm = revolution per minute is almost zero ), which is useless.

p.50-2nd-last paragraph says the extremely-time-consuming MD (= molecular dynamics ) simulated only 5ns, which could Not simulate even one rotation (= taking more than 10 minutes ) of this mini-motor, so completely useless MD simulation in this research.

 

Hyped quantum computer is useless for air force, networking, Amazon web service..

(Fig.I)  Just 36 qubits or 36 bitstring with a lot of errors is still Not a computer.   No practical application. ↓

Insider brief of this hyped news (9/29/2024) says

"IonQ has signed a $54.5 million contract with the U.S. Air Force Research Lab..... will focus on scaling, networking... contracts with Amazon web service."

↑ This IonQ has made only impractical error-prone 36 ion qubits (= each qubit can take only 0 or 1 states, so 36 qubits is still Not a quantum computer that will need at least millions of qubits (= quantum bits ),  this-lower-About ionQ,  this p.4-3.2,  this-summary ).

These trapped ion type qubits can never be scaled up to the level of quantum advantage ( this or this summary ).

Actually IonQ itself admits the hype, as shown in the last of site saying
"IonQ does Not give any assurance that it will achieve its expectations".

(Useless) Quantum computing is Not changing manufacturing, contrary to hypes.

The 2nd and 2nd-last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/29/2024) say

"one of the most popular hybrid algorithms (= hybrid algorithm is just an ordinary classical computer ): the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). QAOA is considered a variational algorithm and is used to find solutions to optimization problems. A Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQA).. refined by classical optimizers"

"it will also take time to be fully applicable... The transition to quantum computing can be a challenge"  ← quantum computer is still useless.

The 3rd paragraph of this recent news (2024) admits
"Quantum computing today provides No tangible advantage over classical computing in either commercial or scientific applications"

Contrary to hypes, not only quantum computer but also the hybrid computer is also useless with No practical use due to the quantum computer's errors ( this-lower What are the challenges ).

This p.2-left-3rd-paragraph says "QAOA (= hybrid algorithm ) remains impractical when a full optimization outer loop is required"

(Impractical) Quantum mechanics cannot shield data from attackers.

The last paragraph of this hyped news (9/29/2024) says

"I am looking forward to seeing how the protocol behaves under experimental imperfections and its practical realization,"  ← this means this research just proposed a (impractical) theory without conducting any experiments.

↑ It seems both corporations and academia feel No guilt about spreading overhyped fake news to hinder today's science forever.

Fictional exciton, trion quasiparticles have No practical application, contrary to hypes.

(Fig.E)  Quantum mechanics has to rely on fictional exciton quasiparticle model to explain electrons transiently excited by light, which is useless.

The 4th, 7th, 12th paragraphs of this hyped news (9/29/2024) say

"Electrons and holes attract each other and form.. an exciton,... If another electron is nearby, it is pulled towards it to form a three-particle state—known as a trion (= both exciton and trion are fictional quasiparticles )"

"The researchers first illuminated.. molybdenum diselenide at cryogenic temperatures (= Not room temperature, so impractical switch ) with short laser pulses, generating the excitons"

"The results could also become useful for future (= imaginary future, so still useless exciton ) applications, for example in sensor technology or optical data processing (= hype )."

This research paper's abstract says nothing about the detailed practical application such as sensors and data processing, so useless quasiparticle research contrary to the above hyped news.

This research's supplementary information ↓

p.3(p.2) Fig.S1 temperature was impractically low = 5K (= cannot be used at room temperature )

p.9(p.8) shows this research just measured light transiently interacting with material where the fictional unseen quasiparticles such as exciton and trion were too short-lived (= lifetime is only pico-second,  this p.2-left-1st-paragraph ) to be any practical application such as switch.

Fictional quasiparticle polaron is useless

The 1st, 2nd paragraph of this hyped news (9/29/2024) say

"A research group.. has observed the cooperative behavior of polaron quasiparticles (= unreal ) formed by the collective interaction of electrons and lattice vibrations around color centers in diamond crystals."

"The discovery was achieved by irradiating diamond crystals containing color centers with ultrashort laser pulses and precisely analyzing the resulting reflectance changes."  ← this research just measured laser light reflectance change, Not fictional quasiparticles.

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract says nothing about practical use, so useless quasiparticle research.

p.6-right used one-pseudo-electron DFT model with artificially-chosen pseudo-potential lacking real atomic shapes = No quantum mechanical prediction

Fictional spin wave or magnon quasiparticle cannot make energy-efficient computers

The 9-10th last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/29/2024) say

"Using our.. X-ray microscope, we were even able to observe the predicted spin waves (= they just measured X-ray affected by material's magnetization, Not fictional spin )"

"we have demonstrated that the direction of these spin waves can be dynamically steered by simply adjusting the magnitude of the applied current (= electric current was used to excite the transient magnetic fluctuation or fictitious spin wave )."

"opens up new possibilities (= just possibilities, still unrealized ) for creating reprogrammable magnonic (= fictional quasiparticle representing the useless magnetic fluctuation or spin wave ) circuits, which could lead to more adaptable and energy-efficient computing systems (= hype )"

Spin wave (= magnetic fluctuation ) losing energy too easily is too short-lived to be practical, contrary to hypes.

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract says nothing about the detailed practical use such as energy-efficient computers (= so useless quasiparticle research ) contrary to the above overhyped news.

p.9-right~p.10-left used fictitious spin wave model whose parameters were artificially-chosen without quantum mechanical prediction (= so No evidence of quantum spin ).

↑ The lifetime of the spin wave (= just transient unstable magnetic fluctuation ) is only nanoseconds, and spin wave can propagate only micrometers (= spin wave loses energy too easily, meaning very energy-inefficient, contrary to hyped narrative ), which too short-lived spin wave cannot be used for any practical application.

Fictional monopole cannot make any practical energy-efficient devices.

(Fig.E)  Just measuring orbiting electrons → fictional magnetic monopole ?  ← quantum mechanical interpretation lacks reality.

The 3rd, 8th, 11th paragraph of this hyped news (9/29/2024) say

"the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of electrons orbiting their atomic nucleus:... a large magnetization could potentially (= just speculation, still useless ) be.. leading to energy-efficient devices (= hype )"

"Why these monopoles are so tantalizing is that OAM is uniform in all directions:"  ← This monopole is fictional quasiparticle consisting of electron's orbits in various directions.

"In ARPES, light shines on a material, ejecting electrons. The angles and energies of these ejected electrons reveal information on the electronic structure of the material..."  ← So they just measured electrons ejected by incident light to imagine fictional monopoles.

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract makes No mention of the detailed practical application such as energy-efficient devices (= so useless fictional monopole research ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.10-left-last says "the sample held around 20K"  ← needing extremely-low temperature, very energy-inefficient and impractical.

Technology of manipulating atoms is spoiled by hyped useless quantum computing.

The 1st paragraphs of this hyped news (9/29/2024) says

"A new technology to continuously place individual atoms exactly where they are needed could (= just speculation ) lead to.. quantum computing and communication"

This research paper's abstract says nothing about any practical application including quantum computing, contrary to the above hyped news.

We already have the excellent technology of manipulating individual atoms, but the unphysical quantum mechanical (quasiparticle) model spoils it, and leads researchers toward fictional deadend quantum computer research.

Topological insulator is useless, its lossless energy is a total lie.

The 1st and last paragraphs of this hyped news (9/29/2024) say

"However, topological insulators fail to maintain this lossless 'magic' at room temperature."  ← Topological insulator is useless, far from lossless energy (= cannot be used at room temperature, this 1st, 7-8th paragraphs = wasting a lot of energy)

"A clear understanding of electron-phonon (= fictional quasiparticle ) interactions..., which would potentially (= just speculation, still unrealized ) enhance the stability and scalability of quantum computers (= hype. The fictional topological quantum computer still has not realized even one qubit )"

 

IBM new 156-qubit quantum computer is overhyped, far from a practical computer requiring millions of qubits.

(Fig.I)  IBM's latest Heron with only 156 qubits is deademd, useless, error-prone, far from millions of qubits required for a practical quantum computer.

The 4-5th-paragraphs of this hyped news (10/6/2024) say

"IBM’s Heron quantum processors offer (only) 156 qubits...
discovering the vast potential (= still unrealized ) of quantum computers across materials design, sustainability, life sciences, finance (= hype )"

↑ Even this IBM latest Heron quantum computer still has only 156 useless qubits (= each qubit can take only 0 or 1 state, so just 156-bitstring is still Not a computer at all ).

Practical quantum computer is said to need more than millions of qubits ( this 4th-paragraph ), which shows the present quantum computer research (= still only 156 qubits, IBM's hyped 1000-qubit machine is an impractical dummy, this 3rd-paragraph ) is already deadend, hopeless.

Furthermore, this latest Heron qubit error rate is still much higher (= each qubit error rate is 1.2 × 10-3 = No progress from the older 127-qubit error-prone eagle,  this-p.5-Fig.2-lower ) than practically-required error rate of 10-15 ( this 5th-paragraph ).

There is No such thing as a useful quantum computer

This recent site's middle~ "How far are quantum computers from other applications ?" shows a pessimistic view on (hopeless) quantum computer;

" PsiQuantum's proposed computer will be too small to run most quantum applications."

"Other applications, such as factoring for code-breaking, require at least "20 million physical qubits (= today's impractical quantum computer has only 100 qubits )"

"That's what people mean by utility scale. We have a high bar to jump"

"There is Not yet consensus around what the first quantum computing use case will be or when it will arrive"

No hope of a real quantum computer that will need millions of qubits (= impossible to achieve forever )

There are No practical quantum computers.  There is only a quantum simulator that is just a classical computer.

(Fig.D)  Quantum simulator is Not a quantum computer but an ordinary classical computer.

The 1st and 3rd paragraph of this site (10/6/2024) say

"DOOM has been ported to quantum computers,... However, the coder behind this feat admits that there is currently No quantum computer capable of executing (playing) this code right now.... as Quandoom can run on a classical computer, even a modest laptop, using a lightweight QASM simulator."

"Quandoom's quantum computer minimum specs are quite steep.. the QASM code requires 72,376 qubits and 80 million gates.... as there is No such quantum computer available with that kind of spec. Thankfully DOOM fans can sidestep the physical hardware requirements on their home PCs (= classical computer ) by running the code in a QASM simulator."

↑ So today's quantum computers are still far from practical computers executing some programs or game.
There are only classical computer simulators (= QASM simulator ) of (still-non-existent) errorless qubits.

Just 33-qubit quantum simulator (= run on classical computer ) is useless.

The 7th paragraphs of this hyped news (10/6/2024) say

"The new BlueQubit plugin for Pennylane supports large-scale quantum simulations, allowing users to simulate systems with up to 33 qubits"

↑ Just 33 qubits are still Not a computer nor large-scale at all (= each qubit can take only 0 or 1 bit state, and more than millions of qubits are necessary for practical application. this-5th-paragraph, which is impossible to achieve forever ).

Furthermore, this is Not a quantum computer but a quantum simulator run on an ordinary classical computer CPU or GPU ( this-middle ).  ← even just 33 error-corrected qubits are impossible to build now.  Quantum computer is deadend.

AI-driven Quantum computer's drug discovery is just hype, impossible.

(Fig.A)  Quantum computer's AI is overhyped useless science unable to discover drugs.  D-Wave is a fake quantum computer with No quantum speed-up.

Quantum computer can never discover drugs.

The 2nd paragraph of this hyped news (10/6/2024) says

"the AI team in JT's pharmaceutical division will (= still unrealized ) utilize D-Wave's annealing quantum computing solutions... aiming to extend the applicable range.. in the drug discovery field (AI-driven Drug Design)"  ← hype

This site's 10th paragraph says
"quantum computing technology cannot be immediately applied to pharmaceutical companies for related production and research due to yet uncorrected loss and errors (= cannot be corrected )"

This-current challenges and limitations says
"Current quantum computers have limited qubits (= only 100 qubits ), and these qubits are prone to errors..
developing quantum algorithms that can outperform classical algorithms for practical drug discovery problems remains a significant challenge"

D-Wave quantum annealing is useless, error-prone, slower than classical computer.

Furthermore, quantum annealing (= QA ) like D-Wave (= just finding equilibrium state from input parameters without computation ), which is proven to be fake quantum computer slower than classical computer's best algorithm, can never discover drugs, contrary to hypes.

This-p.2-4th-paragraph says
"the current implementations of quantum annealing in optimisation are limited in size and Not yet upscaled to real-world situations"

This 10th-paragraph says
"It used an approach known as quantum annealing.. there was little evidence it provided any speed boost compared to classical approaches."

This p.3-2nd-paragraph says
"it (= quantum annealing ) does Not provide evidence of a fundamental or irrefutable performance benefit for this technology"

There is No such thing as artificial intelligence or AI (= today's useless AI falls far short of real human brain ).
So any (fake) AI regulations just add to unnecessary vested interests of the so-called 'expert' or academia by increasing burdens on other people.

Quantum computer's drug discovery is just hype, impossible

The last paragraph of this hyped news (10/6/2024) says

"The next step will be to test the mathematical recipe on quantum hardware"  ← This hyped research is just about pie-in-the-sky theory without conducting any (hype) quantum computer experiments

Teleportation of just several error-prone qubits is meaningless, useless.

(Fig.T)  Even Quantinuum (= world's best errorless) quantum computer has only 30 impractical error-prone qubits with 40% error rate.  ← Quantum computer is officially dead.

Just 3 error prone bits or qubits = Not a computer

The first and last paragraphs of this hyped news (10/6/2024) say

"A team of engineers and physicists at quantum computing company Quantinuum has conducted the first-ever teleportation (= just ordinary classical communication, this 1st-paragraph ) of a logical qubit using fault-tolerant methods (= hype )"

"The work by the team at Quantinuum represents yet another important step toward the development of a true quantum computer (= never happen )"

Even after 40% results were illegitimately discarded, the error rate was still impractically-high.

This research paper ( this ↓ )

p.1-abstract-lower says logical process fidelity was 0.85, which means its error rate (= 1 - fidelity ) was impractically high = 15%.

p.1-left-2nd-paragraph says (only) 30 trapped ion qubits were used in this research.  ← far from the practically-required millions of qubits.

p.2-Fig.2~p.3-Fig.3 used only 3 logical qubits (= 010 ) consisting of 30 ion physical qubits ( each logical qubit can take only 0 or 1 state, which just 3 qubits is still Not a computer )

p.3-left-3rd-paragraph says "In this work, well-prepared Bell states are post-selected (= only good results luckily avoiding errors were post-selected without legitimate error correction )"

p.10 shows the discard fraction (in the illegitimate post-selection ) was 0.34 ~ 0.53 (= about 34% ~ 53% of results were discarded due to irreparable errors, so this latest Quantinuum's machine's actual error rate with only 3 qubits was about 40%, far from practical  ← drug discovery is hype, impossible )

Artificial spin ice cannot make hyped energy-efficient neuromorphic computing

The 2nd and last paragraphs of this hyped news (10/6/2024) say

"One of the possible realizations of such neural networks is through an artificial spin ice (ASI) lattice"

"The results bring us closer (= still unrealized ) to realization of energy-efficient neuromorphic computing (= hype )"

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract made No mention of realizing "energy-efficient" device nor neuromorphic computing (= so useless research ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.4-Fig.3 just measured vague magnetic field (= not spin ) of the hexagonal piece (= each piece is 1 micrometer, far bigger and bulkier than today's hard disc drive's compact bit of only 50nm, so Not energy-efficient at all ) by using magnetic force microscope with No computation nor utility.

Biological, medical research is deadend, unable to utilize atomic interaction due to useless quantum mechanics.

The 5-7th, 10th paragraphs of this hyped news (10/6/2024) say

"Aptamers are short strands of nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) that bind specifically and strongly to target molecules"

"When an aptamer binds to its target, it triggers a structural change in the aptamer sensor such as folding or unwinding... regulates gene expression"

"the team successfully developed sensors capable of detecting drugs and antibiotics like theophylline and tetracycline as well as specific proteins such as MS2 produced by bacteria."

"This study opens up new possibilities (= still unrealized ) for the development of synthetic biosensors (= hype )"

This research paper ↓

p.2-Figure.1 & p.13-5.Expreimental section used No (useless) quantum mechanical methods (= No Schrodinger equation, DFT nor MD was used in this research ), and just used ordinary macroscopic biological experimental methods without manipulating individual atoms (= without considering atomic interaction ) due to useless quantum mechanics.

↑ This research just prepared some RNA strands encoded into viral plasmid DNA. Some molecules bound to the RNA strands changed the RNA's structure and allowed ribosomes to produce jellyfish GFP protein from the RNA, which was detected by antibodies by flow cytometry in bacteria (= E.coli ).

↑ This method of using RNA as "sensor" of some molecules (= based on experience, Not by the useless quantum mechanical prediction ) can be applied only to isolated cells (= like bacterial cell ), which cannot be applied to human body, so useless.

 

Google's fake quantum supremacy just outputting error-prone meaningless random numbers is useless.

(Fig.S)   Google's just 67 qubits output random meaningless numbers with error rate 99.9% = No quantum supremacy nor advantage ↓

Google quantum computers cannot correct errors, so quantum supremacy is impossible.

The 8-10th paragraphs of this hyped news (10/13/2024) say

"This high error rate means that to achieve quantum supremacy, you would need extremely proficient error-correction technologies — which do Not yet exist — or a quantum computer with millions of qubits"  ← today's (fake) quantum computer with far less than millions of qubits (= just 67 qubits ) can Not achieve quantum supremacy.

"However, error correction may still be required when machines scale up."  ← Today's quantum computer cannot correct errors, so No quantum supremacy.

"The scientists used a method known as random circuit sampling (RCS)"  ← just outputting random meaningless numbers with No practical use ( this-5th-paragraph,  this 3rd-paragraph ).

Google 67-qubit quantum computer just output random useless numbers with 99.9% error rates, which cannot prove quantum suprepmacy.

↑ The present quantum computers are too error-prone to give right answers (= meaning No quantum supremacy, No evidence of quantum superposition ), so the present fake quantum supremacy researches try to hide these errors into random meaningless numbers based on unfounded idea that the quantum computer may output random (meaningless) numbers through many simultaneous superposition or parallel-world states that cannot be emulated by classical computer with a single world ( this 6-7th-paragraphs ).

Actually, this research paper ( this p.5-right-1st-paragraph ) estimated (= didn't confirm ) that Google's 67-qubits' error rate outputting random numbers (= after 32 cycle random bit flip ) was about 99.9% (= fidelity was only 1.5 × 10-3,  this 6~10th paragraphs ).

↑ Quantum computer's inability to get right answers with 99.9% error rates (= this error rate was also just an optimistic guess, because they cannot know true error rate from random numbers ) means it is impossible to prove quantum supremacy, because ordinary (practical) classical computers can always give right answers with No errors.

Actually, this 4th-paragraph says
"Google’s latest paper, published today in Nature, doesn't claim to demonstrate Quantum Supremacy"

So this kind of hyped site is fake news, except its last paragraph saying "However, random circuit sampling does Not have a real-world application".

This p.1-referee #1's 3rd-paragraph says
"the current form of the paper does not look suitable for Nature."  ← This negative response wouldn't have happened, if Google quantum computer 'really' achieved quantum supremacy or utility.

China's just 72 qubits is useless, far from millions of qubits required for practical quantum computer.

Insider brief of this hyped news (10/13/2024) says

"the development of the 72-qubit Wukong chip ( this 4th-paragraph )..
aiming (= still unrealized ) to enhance China’s capabilities in quantum computing applications across industries like logistics, pharmaceuticals (= hype )"

A (still-non-existent) practical quantum computer is said to need more than millions of qubits ( this 2nd-paragraph,  this 4th-paragraph ), so just 72 qubits (= one qubit can take only 0 or 1 state ) is useless for any application.

The more Nobel prizes, the higher the university tuition, the unhappier the students become ?  ← real science ?

(Fig.N)  More Nobel prizes → university's tuition ↑  Tax, unnecessary regulations ↑  ← real science ?

The number of nobel prizes is proportional to skyrocketing tuition of ( American ) universities ?

This year's Nobel prizes in physics and chemistry were awarded to neural networks, machine-learning or AI.

But today's neural network or artificial intelligence (= AI ) is impractical, still far from actual human brain ( this 5th-paragraph ).
Drug discovery by AI is just baseless hype.

Some people may not know about AI or machine-learning in physics where researches on fictional extra-dimensional string theory, illusory short-lived particles in wasteful colliders, deadend-fusion try to use AI or machine learning in vain.
The hopeless quantum computer is still Not a computer or calculator, so it is irrelevant to AI, contrary to hypes.

Nobel prize in medicine went to microRNA.
This microRNA, which was found in natural organisms (= Not created by quantum mechanics ), still has no practical application ( this 2nd-paragraph ).

These Nobel prizes were often awarded to American "expensive" universities.  ← The more Nobel prizes were awarded to universities' professors, the higher those universities' tuition becomes, the unhappier the students and taxpayers get ? (= the number of Nobel prizes is proportional to the rising tuition or student loan debt ? )

The still-impractical hyped AI tends to be used only as an excuse to increase unnecessary regulations or vested interests of some academic organization (= prestigious prizes and journals are exploited for this purpose ? ), which just make our life inconvenient and unhappy, contrary to the real science seen in industrial revolution that made our life convenient.

Reason why today's (hyped) AI, Alphafold can never develop drugs nor cure cancers.

See this page.

Quantum entanglement is meaningless, useless for atomic clocks.

The 3rd-last paragraph of this hyped news (10/13/2024) says

"He and his colleagues still have a lot of work to do. For a start, the researchers can only run their clock effectively for about 3 milliseconds. Longer than that, and the entanglement between atoms starts to slip, causing the atomic ticking to become chaotic."  ← too-easily broken,  completely useless entanglement

This research paper ( this ).

p.1-abstract mentions GHZ state of only 4 ~ 9 qubits (= just 4 ~ 9 Sr atoms trapped in laser or optical lattice, p.2-Fig.1 )  ← Just making all 4 ~ 9 atoms the same energy state (= 0000 or 1111 = GHZ state ) by laser light has nothing to do with quantum entanglement

p.6-Fig.4c shows fidelity of 8 atoms or 8 qubits (= N = 8) is very bad = only 0.75, which means error rate is 25% far from precise atomic clock.

 

China's D-Wave breaking military encryption is untrue, just hype, far from a threat.

(Fig.C)  China's D-Wave with only 16 error-prone qubits could break 22 ~ 50-bit encryption key ?  ← this is overblown, far from today's encryption key of 2048 ~ 4096-bits.

Quantum computer is useless, deadend, far inferior to classical computer.

A recent Chinese paper claimed they could break military-grade encryption by using D-Wave annealing machine.

↑ This is untrue and just hype.

They just factored 22-bit ~ 50-bit numbers (= key ), which is far from the currently-used encryption key of 2024-bit ~ 4096-bit numbers ( this 3rd-paragraph,  this 2nd-last ~ last paragraphs ).

This 8~9th-paragraphs ( or this 6th~paragraphs ) say

"the attack was executed on a 22-bit key -- far shorter than the 2048- or 4096-bit keys commonly used in practice today. The suggestion that this poses an imminent risk to widely used encryption standards is misleading."

"quantum computing has Not reached a point where it can break current encryption."

Furthermore, D-Wave annealing machine, which is not a true quantum computer nor superior to classical computer, is too error-prone to factor such numbers.

So this Chinese research used only 16 (physical) qubits (= just 16 bitstring, one qubit can take only 0 or 1 state, which cannot factor any numbers ) of D-Wave annealer combined with classical computer as "hybrid ( this 3rd-paragraph,  this-lower,  this p.14-table-right-use translation )".  ← The error-prone D-Wave alone cannot factor any numbers without the help of classical computer.

Today's classical computer can factor 829-bit number key, which is far superior to today's useless quantum computers ( this p.2-right-lower ).

See also twin paradox is true.

Quantum computer is a fictional target for impractical quantum mechanical research

The 1st, 4th paragraphs of this hyped news (10/20/2024) say

"Researchers have made a discovery that could make quantum computing more compact, potentially (= still unrealized ) shrinking essential components (= hype )"

"Our novel method to create entangled photon pairs.."

This research paper's abstract says nothing about quantum computers, contrary to hypes.  ← This research has No practical use.

This research just created a pair of polarized weak light (= or photons  ← No superluminal entanglement ) with high error rate of 14% (= fidelity is 86% ) even after more than 99% photons were lost (= each photon detection efficiency is just 1.6%, this p.7 )  ← Photon quantum computer can never be realized due to the easily-lost photons (= very low detection efficiency ) and highest error rate.

Quantum computer is useless, unable to calculate chemical energy, contrary to hypes.

(Fig.V)  Useless error-prone quantum computer makes physicists rely on (deceptive) 'hybrid' computer that is just a classical computer.

The 2nd, last paragraphs of this hyped news (or this 2nd,last-paragraphs, 10/20/2024) say

"Qunova Computing demonstrated chemical accuracy using a 20-qubit IQM machine"  ← Just 20 qubits (= one qubit can take only 0 or 1 ), which is far from practically-required millions of qubits, can Not conduct any practical calculation

"standard VQE algorithm, simplifying the problem and capturing only the essential data related to the molecular orbitals. These results were then processed on classical computers to quickly compute the lowest energy outcomes,"

↑ So they used an ordinary classical computer (+ error-prone useless 20 qubits ), which is Not a quantum computer but a classical computer.

↑ These (deceptive) hybrid computers such as VQE using very small numbers of error-prone qubits called NISQ can never outperform the ordinary classical computer, because the hybrid computer heavily relies on classical computer for almost all calculations and choosing better parameters (called ansatz ) that determine the hybrid computer's results ( this 11~13th paragraphs ).

↑ Dealing with calculations that cannot be executed by a classical computer is impossible in the hybrid computer using a classical computer for almost all calculations, so quantum advantage will never happen.

This p.2-left-1st-paragraph says
"We conclude that substantial quantum advantage in VQE-based quantum chemistry is unlikely, unless gate-errors are significantly reduced, or error-corrected hardware is realized (= never happen )"

Quantum mechanics relies on fictional useless exciton quasiparticle model.

The 7~8th paragraphs of this hyped news (10/20/2024) say

"By modulating the concentration of the neodymium to the concentration of the excitons (= fictional quasiparticle model ), we can end up using the neodymium as a kind of probe for the spins in the exciton"

"This is the same concept used in quantum computing..."

This research paper ↓

p.1-abstract says nothing about practical use nor quantum computer (= so this research about fictional quasiparticle is irrelevant to quantum computers ), contrary to the above hyped news.

p.8-method used No quantum mechanical calculation.  ← No evidence of spin that whose unphysical model just hampers science.

Biological or medical researches do Not use Alphafold-AI that cannot explain any biological (= dynamical ) functions.

The last paragraph of this hyped news (10/20/2024) says
"We will (= still unrealized ) now use the methods we have developed to produce molecules"

This research paper's p.11 just used impractically-time-consuming old molecular dynamical simulation (= Not using Alphafold or AI giving only static proteins ) of very short 1 μs time scale that cannot simulate longer important biological reaction.

The 11th-paragraph of another hyped news (10/20/2024) says
"this breakthrough will (= just speculation, still unrealized ) further help accelerate"

This research paper's p.11-right also used only impractically-time-consuming old MD (+ macroscopic biological method without looking into detailed atomic interaction ) without using (useless) alphafold nor AI.

The present cancer researches do Not use any (useless) quantum mechanics, MD nor AI-Alphafold.

The 1st and last paragraphs of this hyped news (10/20/2024) say

"A team of researchers.. has made a significant breakthrough in the fight against cancer by developing a highly selective inhibitor for an enzyme called Matrix Metallopeptidase 7 (MMP7). This enzyme plays a crucial role in cancer progression"  ← but this MMP7 enzyme dealing with (important) wound healing should Not be inhibited blindly.

"This research not only offers new hope (= just hope, still useless research ) for targeting MMP7.."

This research paper's p.4~p.8 used only macroscopic chemical and biological methods without using any (useless) quantum mechanics, time-consuming MD nor AI-Alphafold.

No quantum advantage in future sensing devices

The 1st paragraph of this hyped news (10/20/2024) says

"Oak Ridge National Laboratory have taken a major step forward in using quantum mechanics to enhance sensing devices, a new advancement that could (= just speculation, still useless ) be used in a wide range of areas"

This research paper ↓

p.2-Fig.1 used just 2 weak lights (= 2 correlated photons ? ) emitted from excited Rb atoms going down two paths to image something (by comparing them ).  ← No quantum mechanics.

p.7-1st-paragraph says "the optimal classical measurement is one in which only a single beam coherent state is used to probe the system and no reference beam is used"  ← According to their definition, the use of a "single beam" seems to be "classical measurement", and the use of two weak lights emitted from Rb atoms was treated as "quantum".  ← this is just their artificial definition irrelevant to quantum mechanics or quantum advantage.

↑ There is No quantum mechanical advantage (= the use of two beams or two lights was treated as "quantum" that can be explained also as classical phenomena ) nor practical use in the so-called quantum sensing relying on very expensive photodetectors.

 

Quantum computers factored just 15 = 5 × 3 with only 5 qubits ?  ← Not a computer.

(Fig.P)  Just 5 light pulses (= 5 qubits ? ) is still Not a (quantum) computer

Today's useless quantum computers can factor only useless 15 = 3 × 5 with fake Shor algorithm (= so they still cannot factor even 15 ).

The 1st paragraphs of this hyped news (10/27/2024) says

"researchers have successfully developed the world’s smallest quantum computer (= false, still Not a computer ).. using a single photon.... complete prime factorization according to Shor's algorithm approach."  ← false, too.

Today's useless error-prone quantum computers can factor only very small numbers such as 15 = 3 × 5 and 21 = 3 × 7 ( this 3rd-paragraph ) by using fake Shor algorithms (= which means they have to know the answers before calculations, and cannot factor even 15 ).

The current practical classical computer can factor much, much larger 829-bit numbers (= 10250 ) than today's quantum computers with far smaller numbers of bits or qubits ( this p.2-right-lower,  this 4th-paragraph ).

Just 5 error-prone photon qubits cannot factor even 15 = 3 × 5 without knowing the answer in advance.

This research paper on the alleged small photon quantum computer ↓

p.1-left-last-paragraph says "we experimentally realize a compiled version of Shor's algorithm (= not real Shor's algorithm ) and the factorization of the integer 15"  ← just 15 = 3 × 5

p.2-Fig.1, Fig.2 used only up to 5 weak light pulses (= split from one light or fictitious photon source ) as just 5 bits or 5 qubits (= 01001,  this middle ).  ← Just 5 bitstring is still Not a (quantum) computer.

↑ This complied version Shor algorithm is fake (= factored answers must be known in advance ).  ← A real Shor algorithm is said to need 21 errorless qubits for factoring 15 ( this p.1-left-last-paragraph ) which is impossible to realize.

The error rate of detecting each weak light or a photon is very bad = 85%  ← each photodetector's detection (= quantum ) efficiency was only 15% ( this p.3-Fig.3-lower ).

We should allocate (taxpayers') money wasted on already-hopeless quantum computers to technology of manipulating single atoms for building useful molecular-machines.

Money should be spent on developing useful ' multi-probe atomic force microscopes ' manipulating single atoms, building practical nano-machines curing diseases instead of the hopeless deadend quantum computers.

(Fig.D)  Today's atomic force microscope technology manipulating single atoms is hindered by a single probe tip (= which must be increased to multiple probes ! ) and unphysical quantum mechanical shapeless atomic model.  → huge money and resources are wasted only on the hopeless quantum computers now

Today's (useless) quantum computers have only tiny numbers of qubits (= just 10 qubits, this 3rd-paragraph ), which is far from millions of qubits required for a practical quantum computer ( this 4th-paragraph ).

Taxpayers' money should be used for developing useful atomic force or scanning tunnel microscopes manipulating single atoms with multiple probles and building nano-devices curing diseases instead of being wasted for already-hopeless deadend quantum computers or overhyped AI.

Fictional skyrmion quasiparticles are useless forever.

The 1st and 2nd-last paragraphs of this hyped news (10/27/2024) say

the magnetic skyrmion (= fictional quasiparticle ) might one day (= still useless ) yield new microelectronic devices (= hype )."

"With X-ray laminography, You can basically reconfigure and reconstruct [the skyrmion] from these many, many images and data.. It was a process that took months (= just investigating fictitious skyrmion quasiparticle took months, which is too time-consuming to use for a practical device )."

↑ Just measuring X-ray slightly changed by material's magnetization does Not prove the (fictional) spin.

Overhyped AI-Alphafold can never clarify biological mechanism nor cure diseases.

See this page.

Biological or medical researches do not rely on AI or Alphafold.

The 6th, 2nd-last paragraphs of this hyped news (10/27/2024) say

"research groups report the first high-resolution experimentally determined structures of SpoIVFB (= this protein structure was Not determined by Alphafold or AI )"

"we'll (= still achieved nothing ) peer deeper and deeper into new areas of biology"

This research paper's p.11 used only old impractically-time-consuming molecular dynamical simulation of just 250ns (= too short to explain important protein reactions ) without using Alphafold nor AI.

Medical research cannot elucidate atomic mechanism due to useless quantum mechanics, MD, AI (= Alphafold).

The 7th paragraph of this hyped news (10/27/2024) says

"This technology, which selectively targets and removes cancer cells, has the potential (= still realize nothing ) to reduce side effects "

This research-lower used only traditional macroscopic biological methods (= not looking into detailed atomic interaction ) without using (useless) quantum mechanics, MD nor Alphafold-AI

 

Quantum computer (= only 8 qubits = 01101001 ) is still Not a computer.

(Fig.R)  Only 8 qubits (= one qubit can take only 0 or 1 ) is Not a quantum computer.

Quantum computer is already dead with No hope of utility.

Even after extremely long years of researches, (hyped) quantum computers are still impractical ( this-1st-paragraph ), which fact proved quantum computers are already dead and hopeless forever

The 3rd-paragaph of this hyped news (11/3/2024) says ↓

"Among the quantum error correction resources being developed are classical algorithms ... known as decoders"  ← ordinary classical computer (instead of useless quantum computer,  this-3rd-paragraph ) was used for correcting errors of the error-prone quantum computers in this research.

Today's hopeless quantum computers cannot correct errors of just 8 qubits (= 8 bitstring ).

This research paper of Rigetti's (just) 84 qubit (= actually far less qubits ) error correction ( with the help of classical computer ) ↓.

p.1-abstract mentions only 8 qubits (= each one qubit can take only 0 or 1 ) out of Rigetti's 84-qubit quantum computer (= p.10-C. ) were used.  ← just 8 qubits is Not a computer, and still far from millions of qubits required for a practical quantum computer ( this-4th-paragraph ).

p.4-right-1st-paragraph says "error rate (or these just 8 qubits ) was 20.5% even after error correction by classical computer called decoding"

↑ We should stop wasting (taxpayers') money on this already-deadend hyped quantum computers or AI, and allocate the money for developing practical multi-probe atomic force microscopes manipulating single atoms for curing diseases and truly-energy-efficient nano-devices.

Just 16 error-prone qubits is useless, can never be a quantum simulator, contrary to hypes.

(Fig.S)  Just 16 qubits (= 16 bitstring ) is Not a quantum computer nor a quantum simulator.

There is No such thing as a quantum simulator nor quantum processor.  Just 16 bitstring is Not a computer

The 1st, 4th, 18-19th paragraphs of this hyped news (11/3/2024) say

"Quantum computers hold the promise to emulate complex materials,.. This may one day (= still unrealized ) lead to the discovery or design of better semiconductors, (= hype )"

"By dynamically controlling how the 16 qubits (= one qubit can take only 0 or 1 state, so just 16 bitstring is still Not a computer )... the researchers were able to emulate how electrons move between atoms"

"they slightly changed the energy of each qubit (= just classical superconducting circuit ) by applying different microwave signals"

"the researchers enabled photons (= classical light or microwave ) to hop between qubits in the same complex manner that electrons hop between atoms in a magnetic field."  ← unrealistic analogy or fake simulation

↑ This means this research tried to treat only 16 (classical) superconducting circuits (= just 16 qubits ) excited by classical microwave as fictitious electrons (= a qubit circuit = a fictitious electron ? ) moving inside some irrelevant material, which they called "quantum simulator ( this p.2 )"

↑ This bulky superconducting circuit or ( error-prone ) qubit is completely different from an electron inside material, so this is a fake simulator (= just 16 qubits falls far short of millions of qubits required for a practical computer ) with far-fetched interpretation that cannot be used for discovering better semiconductor or insulator, contrary to hypes.

Just sending weak light over only 15 ~ 25 km is far from practical quantum network that is impossible to realize forever.

(Fig.N)  Still sending weak light over only 15km with 43% error rate is a completely useless and hopeless quantum internet despite longtime researches.

The 1st paragraphs of this hyped news (11/3/2024) say

"towards a future quantum internet (= still unrealized ).... with deployed optical internet fiber, enabling a 25 km quantum link."  ← Just 25km short link is far from a practical quantum internet.

This research paper p.2 shows weak light was emitted from either of two nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond excited by light in Delft or Hague over only 10km ~ 15km (= too short distance to be a practical internet ) toward the light detectors in the middle point between them.

This p.27-lower shows the measured error rate of this still-impractical quantum network was 43.2 ~ 46.6%.

↑ Despite extremely-longtime quantum network research, physicists could send (weak) light over only 10 ~ 15km (= No progress ) with impractically-high error rate.  ← Quantum network or internet research is deadend, useless forever.

Actual medical researches do Not use hyped AI, Alphafold or (useless) quantum mechanics.

(Fig.A)  AI, Alphafold that cannot explain any biological reaction is useless in medical research that cannot look into detailed atomic interaction due to useless quantum mechanics.

No AI, Alphafold nor quantum mechanics is used in the present cancer research.

The 2nd-last paragraph of this hyped news (11/3/2024) says

"By analyzing the BID (= protein ) and caspase-2 activity in cancer cells, we could potentially (= still unrealized ) identify patients who are most likely to respond to drugs that interfere with cell division"

This research paper ↓

p.12~p.14 Materials and methods used only traditional macroscopic biological tools (= not looking into atomic mechanism, = CRISPR, RT-PCR, Western blot, immunofluorescence.. ) without using (useless) quantum mechanics, AI or Alphafold.

AI, Alphafol unable to explain protein conformational change has to rely on old impractical molecular dynamics hampering science.

The 2nd, 3rd, 7th paragraphs of this hyped news (11/3/2024) say

"AlphaFold.... However, the function of proteins depends on their dynamic characteristics"  ← Alphafold cannot deal with dynamic protein function.

"the researchers integrated a physically constrained coarse-grained (impractical) molecular dynamics model with enhanced sampling methods"

"This model has the potential (= still unrealized ) to revolutionize our understanding of protein behavior"

This research paper ↓

p.10-right-4th-paragraph used extremely-time-consuming old molecular dynamics (= MD,  No AI nor Alphafold was used here ) for only 500ns short-time simulation, which MD is too short to simulate much longer important biological reaction.

So developing effective drugs is impossible in today's quantum mechanics, AI, Alphafold, MD and protein experimental methods (= X-ray crystallography ).

 

to

Feel free to link to this site.