(Fig.1) Quantum biology is a fake biology relying only on fictional useless quantum mechanical concepts. ↓
Recently, the dubious science field called "quantum biology" seems to be illogically gaining attention by various exaggerated fake news.
This quantum biology is just a useless overhyped pseudo-science irrelevant to real biology ( this-lower-quantum biology today, this last-paragraph, this p.2-left-1st-paragraph ).
This 4-6th-paragraphs (2023) say
"This lack of experimental verification is one of the main reasons that the field is considered inconsequential.. by the established quantum and biophysics communities"
"Another reason quantum biology is Not considered a legitimate field of science"
This-lower-still room for acceptance (5/29/2025) says
"quantum biology continues to face skepticism outside the trenches...
Physicists may view biology as too messy and complicated for systematic analysis, while biologists may see quantum mechanics as too far from the scales and behaviors they are accustomed to." ← Quantum mechanics or quantum biology is impractical.
This-lower-Criticisms ~ Looking ahead says
"many publications in the field of quantum biology lack numerical support for their hypotheses or fail to produce undisputed evidence"
"Scientists have yet to benefit from exploiting these very quantum tools as proposed by quantum biology researchers"
Quantum biology baselessly claims each unbreakable single particle can be unrealistically in two different places or superposition states at once like a dead and alive cat living in fantasy parallel worlds, which can Not be observed or proved.
All other concepts included in the quantum biology are also just a fictional ungrounded pseudo-science, as seen in quantum consciousness, immortality, arrow of time, superluminal spooky entanglement, negative-kinetic-energy tunneling.
The 1st-2nd paragraphs of this site say
"yet we're still not that much closer to figuring out how strong an association there is between the two, or whether there really is a viable link at all. Quantum biology is still very much an unknown.."
".. Not only are the intricate details of quantum biology not fully understood, but the basic concept is also the source of much confusion."
The 2nd paragraph of this site says
" However, in many ways quantum mechanics is still a concept alien to biology.."
The 8th paragraph of this site says
" quantum biology is still predominantly theoretical.."
The current only atomic theory = unrealistic quantum mechanics has been useless and ignored by biologists and medical researchers ( this 4.Biologists'view, this 12th paragraph, this-abstract-first ).
Quantum mechanics is still unable to explain atomic mechanisms behind many biological reactions such as brain ( this 5th paragraph ), cancers.. ( this 2nd paragraph, this 2nd-last paragraph, this p.2-left ) despite 100-year-old fruitless researches, which fact shows quantum mechanics is hopeless pseudo-science.
(Fig.1') Overhyped fake news trying to connect the useless quantum mechanics with some practical application such as biology and (hopeless) quantum computers is needed.
An incredible amount of the overhyped media desperately tries to connect (hopeless) quantum computers (= useless forever ) to the illusory quantum biology or medicine.
This-lower-Challenges at intersection of science and profit (1/24/2025) says
"quantum biology isn't without hurdles. Critics argue that the field is still in its infancy, with much of the research resting on theoretical foundations." ← Quantum biology is just a useless pie-in-the-sky theory.
This-lower-Challenges and future prospects.. (2/18/2025) says
"Quantum biology, despite its promising potential, faces several significant challenges that need to be addressed before its full commercialization (= still impractical ). One of the primary hurdles lies in the technical stability and scalability of ( fictional parallel-universe ) quantum computing (= overhyped, useless forever )"
Despite an incredible amount of overhyped fake news, this latest news' 3rd paragraph (5/31/2025) says
"our analysis shows No consistent evidence that quantum algorithms outperform classical methods" ← No quantum advantage
The 3rd-last paragraph of this overhyped news (3/30/2025) says
"The quantum computing world should take serious notice (= this research p.10-12 is just about imaginary theory without performing any experiments nor using quantum computers )"
This overhyped highlight is just about classical computer's simulation of some "quantum" methods instead of using today's impractical quantum computers.
(Fig.2) Photosynthesis by quantum biology is based only on fictional concepts that prevent clarifying real mechanism and science development. ↓
Some scientists claim the quantum biology based on fictional quantum superposition (= or coherence ) where two energy states exist simultaneously like a dead and alive cat living in (fictional) parallel universes may be involved in the photosynthesis, though still No evidence ( this 4th-last paragraph, this p.5-last ).
This 2nd~3rd paragraphs say
"Ten years ago, researchers reported evidence that photosynthesis - the process by which green plants and some bacteria turn sunlight into chemical energy - gains light-harvesting efficiency by exploiting the phenomenon of "quantum coherence". This involves the superpositions of electronic quantum states, which seem able to explore many energy-transmitting pathways at once"
"The question has been hotly debated over the past decade...
And some researchers insist that such coherence plays No useful role in photosynthesis at all."
↑ Whether photosynthesis really uses (fictional) quantum superposition (= parallel worlds ) or not is still controversial ( this-9th-paragraph, this p.6-left-3rd-paragraph ), which means whether photosynthesis actually uses (fictional) quantum superposition or not has No influence on our daily life. ← Quantum biology is a useless pseudo-science.
Actually, it is impossible to see the (fictional) quantum coherent superposition or a dead and alive cat living in parallel worlds, because we can see only one state or one world at once. ← the unseen quantum superposition is a meaningless concept.
Furthermore, quantum biology tries to explain the mechanism of photosynthesis using fictional particles called "exciton quasiparticles ( this 3rd-paragraph, this 5th-paragraph, this abstract-last, this 13th paragraph )" with fake effective mass (= these unrealistic masses can be artificially changed even to negative mass ).
These fictional quasiparticles frequently used in the current quantum mechanical researches are expressed just as nonphysical math symbols which abstract expressions tell us nothing about detailed physical mechanisms ( this p.3, this p.2-left-last, this p.15 ). ← Science stops progressing.
The 5~6th paragraphs of this hyped news say
"The team has succeeded in providing robust evidence of electronic and vibrational quantum coherence (= unseen superposition ) by performing 2D electronic spectroscopic measurements at 20K" ← Too low temperature that has nothing to do with the normal photosynthesis at room temperature.
"The results could potentially (= still useless research ) advance our understanding of the fundamental processes underlying photosynthesis,"
↑ This research paper ↓
p.2-right-middle says " We further construct an excitonic model (= fictional quasiparticle ) and refine the parameters by simultaneously fitting them to the experimental spectra" ← Just fitting experimental results to fictitious exciton model and artificial parameters with No quantum mechanical prediction.
p.11-12 describes electrons and fictional exciton model as nonphysical math symbols with No shapes, and they just artificially adjusted parameters to experiments ( this p.3.p.6, this p.5-6, p.10 ).
↑ Physicists just tried to explain the observed light interacting with molecules by fictional exciton quasiparticle model (= No shape, so No practical use ) and artificially adjust parameters with No quantum mechanical prediction (= No quantum mechanical evidence ).
So there is No evidence of quantum biology or fictional exciton quasiparticle in photosynthesis.
This overhyped research is just about imaginary theory of fictional exciton quasiparticle with No experiments ( this-p.9-11-methods )
The 4th paragraphs of this hyped news (2/15/2025) say
"Green plants and other photosynthetic organisms use quantum mechanics to capture and transfer sunlight with remarkable efficiency (= hype )... When light is absorbed in a leaf, for example, the electronic excitation energy is distributed over several states of each excited chlorophyll molecule; this is called a superposition (= fictional unseen parallel universes ) of excited states."
This 3rd-paragraph says
"But as yet there is No unambiguous experimental evidence that a single living cell can maintain or utilize quantum superposition states"
↑ This research paper's p.10-11-Materials and methods measured light or spectroscopy from some chlorophyll molecules of spinach, and tried to interpret it by using unphysical one-pseudo-electron time-dependent- DFT or TDDFT with artificially-chosen unreal exchange potential functionas (= SCS-ωPBEPP86 using artificially-adjustable parameters without quantum mechanical prediction, this-p.6,7-left ) and rough (Tamm-Dancoff) approximation (= often fail ), which can Not predict anything nor validate quantum mechanics.
(Fig.3) In a bird's eyes, two molecules excited by light and weak earth's magnetic field are 'linked' by (imaginary) superluminal quantum entanglement !? ← quantum biology is useless pseudo-science
Some researchers proposed another unfounded idea that migratory birds may feel the earth's magnetic field through (fictional) quantum mechanical faster-than-light spooky action called entanglement.
↑ But quantum entanglement can Not send any real information nor do any work to receivers ( this 2nd-paragraph, this 3rd-paragraph ), so entanglement that cannot influence other molecules is a completely meaningless concept also in biology and birds.
This last-paragraph says
"Ironically, entanglement itself may not be essential to the process that allows birds to see a magnetic field"
This 4th-paragraph says
"However, proving quantum entanglement in biological systems has been challenging"
This 2nd-last-paragraph says
"It's not clear whether the higher sensitivity of robin CRY4 in laboratory tests is a result of evolutionary pressure for migratory birds to have a better magnetic sensor"
↑ No evidence that (fictional) quantum entanglement (= that cannot send any real information ) may influence migratory birds ( this 10th-paragraph ).
The 6-7th, 9th paragraphs of this site say
"And in the eyes of some birds, there appears to exist such a system, built around a light-sensing protein called cryptochrome"
"When a particle of light, or photon, hits bird cryptochrome, its energy can perturb molecules within the protein. The disturbance catapults a pair of molecules into an unstable state so fragile that it can be affected by even the subtle energetic pulse of Earth’s magnetic field."
" If an electron is knocked out of place—perhaps exiting one molecule and joining another—this creates what’s called a radical pair,.... the fates of the two molecules involved are actually linked, locking them into a strange, delicate state known as quantum entanglement." ← these two molecules transiently excited by light have nothing to do with faster-than-light entanglement that cannot influence other atoms realistically.
This last links to this research paper (= about quantum biology in birds ) whose abstract says nothing about quantum entanglement, contrary to the above hyped news.
↑ This research paper p.20(or p.19) tried to explain this bird's eye molecule by using the unrealistic model (= that can clarify nothing ) such as time-consuming useless molecular dynamics (= MD ) and one-pseudo-electron density functional theory with artificially-chosen CAM-B3LYP exchange energy functional lacking real atomic picture, which just hampers clarifying true mechanism..
This artificially-chosen CAM-B3LYP hybrid exchange energy functional (= potential ) includes several freely-adjustable parameters (= you can freely choose parameters to fit experimentally values instead of quantum mechanical theory predicting them ), so No quantum mechanical prediction (= No proof of quantum entanglement in bird's eyes )
Even this hyped site (= lower-What scientists still don't know ) admits (5/31/2025)
"Pieces of the cryptochrome puzzle continue to emerge. No single expert can claim to have the complete story...
yet more studies are needed."
↑ No evidence of quantum entanglement in biology after all.
(Fig.3') Nerve's myelin sheath emits entangled photons or lights ? ← Actually, quantum entanglement is meaningless, useless.
The 2nd, 2nd-last, last paragraphs of this hyped news (8/16/2024) say
"Now, a research group in China has shown that many entangled photons can be generated inside the myelin sheath that covers nerve fibers. It could (= just speculation ) explain the rapid communication between neurons," ← false. entanglement transmits No information
"their result is a combination of two phenomena that exist but are still largely mysterious: consciousness (let alone quantum consciousness) and quantum entanglement"
"We won't say there is a direct connection. At this early stage" ← still No evidence of quantum entanglement inside nerves.
↑ This research paper ↓
p.7-right-last-paragraph saysp.8-left-Discussion says " It should be noted that our model is very crude (= inaccurate ). The actual electromagnetic field should take into account the coupling of photons to the vibron ensembles, i.e. polaritons (= unreal quantum quasiparticle model will never clarify true mechanism )"
(Fig.4) Quantum tunneling based on unreal unmeasurable negative kinetic energy is useless for discovering transistors and actual biology.
Quantum mechanics ridiculously claims that transistors and quantum biology may use quantum tunneling based on unreal negative kinetic energy ( this-p.84, this-2~3rd-paragraphs ).
The point is quantum tunneling is Not a ghost-like phenomenon but a natural classically-possible (= realistic ) phenomenon where electrons can naturally jump between two atoms which are separated by a very short distance less than 1 nm under applied voltage through the air or vacuum which empty space (= No real barriers or walls ) is wrongly treated like a "rigid imaginary wall" or insulator (= imaginary potential wall, though precise potential energy between atoms separated by extremely short distance is unknown ) by irrational quantum mechanics.
Quantum mechanics just imagines "illusory potential energy wall", and makes an unscientific claim that each electron can penetrate such an invisible potential barrier by having unrealistic negative kinetic energies ( this p.4-2nd-paragraph, this-1st-paragraph ) without deeper explanations. ← Pursuing deeper truth is prohibited by the unrealistic quantum mechanical model !
It is impossible for electrons to go through (imaginary) potential barriers by (unreal) negative kinetic energy-tunneling, because all electrons should stop at the the point of zero kinetic energy point (= all electrons have to pass the zero-kinetic energy point before entering the unreal negative kinetic energy barrier region ), so cannot advance to the negative-kinetic energy region nor tunnel in quantum mechanical theory.
↑ Electrons can naturally flow over such an extremely thin space (= only 1 nm ) by ordinary thermal fluctuation or de Broglie wave interference even without relying on unrealistic negative kinetic energy ( this-1st-paragraph ) of quantum mechanics.
As shown in various double slit interference experiments of a single electron and a single molecule (= separation between two slits is 100nm ~ 1μm ), de Broglie wave can influence and modify motions of other electrons or particles at a distance of 100nm ~ 1μm ( this-1 μm, this-p.6-280 nm, this-p.8-p.12-100 nm ), which distance is long enough to explain quantum tunneling.
As a result, quantum biology can never be useful as long as the irrational quantum mechanical atomic model stubbornly refuses to clarify detailed underlying physical mechanisms behind fantasy quantum superposition, parallel worlds, faster-than-light entanglement and ghost quantum tunneling.
Actually, the 3rd-last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "There is still a long and exciting road ahead of us to understand how biological processes work on the subatomic level,.. In the future, we are hoping to investigate how tautomers produced by quantum tunneling can propagate and generate mutations.." ← quantum biology is still useless except for speculating imaginary future, repeating only uncertain "future" phrases.
This research paper ↓
p.3-last says "In addition, the biological effects derived from the quantum tunneling have Not been clarified"
p.8-1st-paragraph says " Although the quantum tunneling effect in the ATPase-mediated ATP hydrolysis reaction has not been experimentally demonstrated in this study"
↑ No proof of the quantum tunneling with (unreal, unseen) negative kinetic energy involved in biology.
This-p.12-right~p.13 shows quantum tunneling can be expressed only as an abstract meaningless equation (= No quantum mechanical prediction ) that can Not clarify any detailed mechanism such as (unreal) negative kinetic energy.
(Fig.5) Contrary to overhyped fake news, quantum biology is useless for any science such as brain, Alzheimer, (parallel-world) quantum computer
The 2nd, 4-6th paragraphs of this or this recent overhyped news about the alleged quantum biology say
"researchers has discovered a distinctly quantum effect in biology that.. may (= just speculation ) also present a way for the brain to protect itself from degenerative diseases like Alzheimer's. The result,.. is not only an important discovery for neuroscience, but also suggests new applications of techniques for quantum computing researchers," ← hype
"A lone molecule of tryptophan displays a fairly standard quantum property: it can absorb a particle of light (called a photon) at a certain frequency and emit another photon at a different frequency. This process is called fluorescence"
"when many, many tryptophan molecules are arranged in a symmetrical network, like they are in larger structures like centrioles,.. they fluoresce stronger and faster than they would if they were fluorescing independently. The collective behavior is called "superradiance," ← this superrradiance or collective light enhancement can be explained by classical light, the unphysical quantum photon is unnecessary, unable to clarify any real mechanism.
↑ This research paper ↓
p.1-abstract says nothing about practical use, (hyped) quantum computing, nor brain Alzheimer diseases (= so useless research ), contrary to this overhyped news.
p.7-right-last-paragraph says "These promising results point toward superradiant emission, but fluorescence QYs (= quantum yields, p.6-left = just ~13% ) need to be complemented by lifetime measurements in order to measure the radiative rate of fluorescence. This was Not done in the present study..., which is not possible with a single experimental setup.... we cannot obtain a reliable radiative rate." ← still No evidence.
↑ This p.5~p.6, p.11 used abstract effective Hamiltonian (= No real atomic shape ) with artificially-chosen parameters with No quantum mechanical prediction (= so No proof of quantum mechanical involvement ).
This other related paper (p.3-left. p.6-left-artificially-chosen-scaling factor, one-pseudo-electron density functional theory, p.6-right-empirical atomic charge, p.7-left-fictitious exciton quasiparticle ) also shows quantum mechanics relying on artificially-chosen parameters and fictional models is useless, unable to predict anything, just hampering scientific development by its unphysical model.
(Fig.6) Electron spin is unreal, just magnetic field caused by electron's orbit.
The 6th, 3rd-last paragraphs of this hyped news (5/10/2025) say
"This new work demonstrates that electron spin can affect the motion of protons in lysozyme crystals (= Not real lysozyme ), suggesting a direct quantum influence on this energy-related process."
"Scientists envision potential (= still unrealized ) breakthroughs in precision medicine, clean energy solutions, and data processing that borrow nature’s quantum tricks."
↑ The 3rd-last paragraph of the same research's news says
"limitations remain. The experiments were performed on purified lysozyme crystals under lab conditions, and it's unclear how the observed effects play out in the complex environments inside living cells" ← still the (fictional) electron spin's involvement in biology is unclear.
↑ This research paper ↓
p.1-abstract says nothing about any practical use such as clean energy, contrary to the above hyped news.
p.2-Fig.1(B) says "The lysozyme crystal (= Not real lysozyme inside bodies ) is positioned atop alternating Ni and Au electrodes electrically connected. A constant magnet is placed beneath the device, allowing to magnetize the Ni layer." ← So they consider this magnetized Ni as the fictional electron spin that can be replaced by electron's orbit.
p.2-right-2nd-paragraph says "we demonstrate that the proton transfer process in Lysozyme crystals is coupled to electron transfer. By the injection of spin-polarized electrons (= from magnetized Ni ) into the crystal, we show a relations between the efficiency of proton transport in the biological crystals"
p.4-left-2nd-paragraph says "Additionally, at higher humidity, protons are more likely to transfer through water molecules"
p.6-Methods made No mention of quantum mechanics nor electron spin, so this research is irrelevant to quantum biology or quantum mechanical prediction.
↑ So this experiment just measured the electric resistance of lysozyme crystals (= Not original lysozymes inside organisms ) under various humidity (= protons tend to be transferred in this water ) and applied magnetic field (= fictional electron spin ? ) with No quantum mechanics nor biology involved.
Feel free to link to this site.
.png?w=900){kind=link}
