Top page (correct Bohr model including the two-electron atoms)

Strange "spin" is NOT a real thing

Special relativity is wrong.

- Why they try to hide fatal paradoxes and truth ?
- Why they NEVER explain quantum field theory in plain words ?
- All illusions are created to fill "time gap".

*(Fig.1) We NEVER see fatal paradoxes of special relativity in textbooks. Why ?*

As shown in this page, special relativity includes fatal paradoxes such as Ehrenfest, and right-angle lever, and electric current wire.

This means special relativity is **wrong**.

These important paradoxes have been known for very long time and have **NOT** been solved.

In spite of this fact, they just repeat the conventional phrases " relativity can survive through various varifications.

In Fig.1 left, the lever is NOT rotating, but the **instant** observer starts to move, this lever starts to rotate in Fig.1 right !. Of course, this is paradox.

*(Fig.2) Observer's looking power moves the charged particle ??*

This is also clearly a paradox, and has NOT been solved.

By the simple observer's movement, the external charged particle is **attracted** to the electric wire (S'), though from the stationary observer (S) they are not attracted to the **neutral** wire.

See also this page.

The important point is that these fatal paradoxes of special relativity are **NEVER** seen in usual relativity **textbooks**.

Probably, in almost all classes about relativity, these paradoxes are NEVER taught to students.

These are **serious** problems, which clearly have very **bad** influences on their future.

*(Fig.3) Special relativity ( Dirac equation ) is one of most influential theories.*

In spite of those fatal paradoxes, the relativity survived for more than 100 years.

So we **have to explain the reason** why the relativity with fatal paradoxes survived.

( And we have to think about the reason why the ordinary relativity textbooks **NEVER** write about these important paradoxes. )

The main reason exists in the very important Dirac equation.

Before the computers become popular in 1980s - 1990s, the Bohr-Sommerfeld model could not deal with very compilicated **three-body helium** atoms.

In this situation, Dirac equation could combine spin and relativity properly.

**Inside** this Dirac equation, special relativity has survived, and Dirac equation is a basic tools in QED, standard model and string theory.

*(Fig.4) Infinite bare charge and mass are real ?*

Of course, if special relativity is wrong, **all** relativistic theories such as QED, standard model, string theory, and general relativity (= black hole, expanding universe ) are **all wrong**.

As I said, these serious situations are caused by the **time gap** from 1920s to 1990s in Fig.3.

QED is oftern menthioned as a example which shows the proof of special relativity.

But QED completely relies on "**virtual**" photons (= **tachyon** ), which **disobey** relativity.

And as shown in this page, QED uses **wrong** maths to get correct values.

( Of course, ordinary people cannot access this QED, due to their NOT-easy-to-understand textbooks. )

*(Fig.5) "Proof" of general relativity ??*

And as shown in this page, general relativity completely relies on local **inertial** frame.

So if special relativity includes fatal paradoxes, general relativity is wrong, too.

In some top journal, we see the news, "general relativity proves to be correct" by observing **7000**-light-year far away dwarf star.
They insist, some pulsar, which is spinning 25 times per second, and white dwarf star rotating around it, emits **illusory** gravity waves, and changes orbital period of dwarf star slightly.

Unfortunately, these are only **speculation**, we cannot access this site, and how they can know various precise influences such as unknown **dark matter** on extremely long **7000** light years path ?

This is **impossible**.

Even on the earth, we **cannot** know detailed history 7000 years ago.

If they are **confident** about the truth of special (general) relativity, why they **hide** various paradoxes from usual textbooks ?
This is very strange.

*(Fig.6) Non-ether = virtual photon model violates special relativity !*

We often see the comments like " we have **never** observed phenomena which show general (special) relativity is wrong. " in various news.

But instead of observing **imaginary** phenomena which are **unbelievably** far away (= 7000 light years ), we can much more **easily** prove special relativity is wrong in our **daily** life.

According to the present relativistic theory, basic Coulomb and magnetic forces are said to be caused by strange **virtual** photons, because they insist "aether" was denied.

And as shown in this page, these virtual photons are always **tachyonic** and **violates** Einstein mass formula.

So even if we don't try to observe very far-away things, we can easily prove special (and general ) relativity is wrong in our daily lives.

*(Fig.7) Black hole really exists ?*

Black hole is a **imaginary** concept, which can be predicted by general relativity.

Of course, black holes **absorb everything**, we cannot observe them directly.

We only estimate their existences by "jets" and x-rays, which they insist, emitted from **around** black hole.

And the proof that special relativity is wrong indicates these black holes are only **imaginary** things.

First, general relativity can **NOT** explain rotations of galaxy (= flat rotation curve problem ).

Rotation speed of statrs near edge of galaxy is much **faster** than that of general relativity (such as black hole ).

**Adjusting** their stories to fit these facts, unkown **dark matter** needed to be "artificially" created .

In fact, among physicists, there are other theories such as **plasma** cosmology, which does NOT need black hole, even now.

The important problem is that most web news NEVER tell these truth, and they just **exaggerate** and confuses ordinary people only by **fascinating** words such as "black hole" and "entanglement".

Of course, I **understand** they are doing for business, but do you think many students would be victims of them ?

*(Fig.7') Researcher's "desire" can change the true experimental results ?*

For now, **imaginary** concepts such as gravitational waves and supersymmetric particle (SUSY) have NOT been detected.

But as you see in modern particle physics, researchers and journals **MUST** find these **illusory** things to **complete** the present final theory **by all means**.

Of course, **unreal** 10-dimensional string theory, the **only** final theory of quantum mechanics and general relativity is **wrong**, as I said above.

( If there is no SUSY, superstring theory becoms **26** dimensional and "**tachyon**" appears. )

So someday it is possible that their **strong** desire may **change** and **distort** the real experimental results, and they may report illusory things like these would be found inside **infinite noises**, I'm afraid.

*(Fig.8) Quantum field theory is just "math", Not physics. *

You may often here the news such as "Higgs particles" have been found ( not directly ).

But if you try to know the concrete mechanism of this Higgs, you need to study very **complicated** relativistic quantum field theory (QFT).

In the same way, you often see the comments such as "QED is **most successful** theory in the world".

But ordinary people **cannot** access this QED easily, so all they can do is to **believe** these comments, not confirming by themselves.

Not only ordinary people but also physicists in other areas don't know about these very complicated QFT and QED.

The problem is these QFT and QED are **really** so difficult things ?

*(Fig.9) Quantum field theory itself is not so difficult.*

The important point is that quantum field theory is NOT so difficult for ordinary people to understand .

Most textbooks about quantum field theory **"intentionally" avoid** easy explanation.

( I'm not saying about popular science books, which don't tell truth. )

For example, vector potential "A" with Dirac equation is most important concept in QED and standard model.

But as shown in this page and this page, these virtual particles **disobey** special relativity.

If they explain QFT and QED in very plain words, ordinary people and students can easily **notice** their **fatal defects**. ( This is a **serious** problem for them. )

This is the main reason why they **avoid** easy-to-understand explanations.

*(Fig.10) Relativistic quantum field theory itself violates relativity.*

Not only virtual photons but also electrons ( or positrons ) **disobey** special relativity.

As shown in this page, when we calculate wave velocity from frequency and wavelength used in Kelin-Gordon and Dirac equation, its wave velocity becomes **faster-than-light** due to its mass energy.

They insist, if electron and positron are put together, they can solve this problem.

But electron or positron themselves are faster-than-light **tachyon**, individually.

And as shown in this page, if they explain QED in plain words, ordinary people **notice** its **wrong math**.

( Again, this is a serious problem for them. )

So, to **hide** various fatal defects, they **intentionally** make QFT and QED textbooks very hard to understand.

This is the truth.

*(Fig.11) Superposition = unrealistic Many-worlds !*

According to the quantum mechanics, the instant we try to observe a particle, the wavefunction **spreading all space** collapses into a **point** particle.

This process is *faster-than-light* (= nonlocal ), so we have to adopt strange **many-world** theory to avoid nonlocal phenomena.
In the many-world theory, observing the particle means we see one of infinite worlds which include particles of different states.

Of course, this theory is **impossible**, so most physicists **give up** asking what the wavefunction really is.

( Some people try to adopt other interpretations, but unfortunately this strange many-world theory is the **leading** theory now. )

*(Fig.12) Spinning speed of electron ?*

If the electron spin means real rotating, its spinning speed must be more than **100 times speed of light**, as shown in this page.

And the spinning electron can NOT return to its original configuration by one revolution.

( It needs **two revolutions**. This concept is **impossible** in this real world, as I said many times. )

So **all** physicists **give up** asking what the strange spin really is.

As you may notice, if we give up asking about wavefunction and spin, **what on earth is left** ?

*(Fig.13) Remains of "Shut up and calculate !"= entanglement, quantum computers.*

Due to the **unreality** of quantum mechanics, all they can do is "Shut up and calcualte !", giving up asking.

As you feel, if we stop asking about wavefunction and spin, there is almost **Nothing** left we can ask about.

But journals and researchers **need** to continue **publishing** something even under these situations.

Under these very **limited** conditions, they created illusory fields such as entanglement and quantum computers.

This is the reason why these concepts are created and survive, though they are very strange.

*(Fig.14) Various illusions needed to be created to fill time gap.*

As I said above, under the present strange quantum theory, we do "Shut up and calculate !" too much.

So under this very **strict** conditions, they (= journals and researchers ) **need to find** some new things, which can **attract** ordinary people's attentions.

As I say in top page, very complicated three-body helium couldn't be solved without **computers**.

Due to this time gap ( from 1920s to 1990s ), various **illusory** fields such as entanglement and quantum computers need to be created to **fill** this gap in physical world.

And serious **paradoxes** of special relativity have been **hidden** and eliminated from usual textbooks.

*(Fig.15) Entangled photon = classical waves.*

Unfortunately, researchers and news writers **don't** try to tell ordinary people for them to understand.

They just repeat some fascinating words such as entanglement and quantum computers for laymen.

The main reason is that these spooky "faster-than-light" link is just an **illusion**.

If they tell all the truth of experiments, some ordinary people can **notice** their **defects**.

Actually, they **never** try to explain concrete mechanism of this spooky link at all.

As shown in this page, we can easily explain these phenomena using usual classical electromagnetic waves.

( The trick is that they **always** use the word of "**photon**", instead of waves. )

First, **polarization** and interference mean they are **waves**, NOT particles.

*(Fig.16) Because, they are obstructing development of "real" science under their present stance.*

Most serious problem is that these **illusory** fields can **NEVER** be useful for our daily living.

Actually even if we study about 10-dimentionnal string theory ( 11-dimensional M theory ), QED, expanding universe, and black hole, they are completely **useless**.

It cannot be helped that some top journal had spreaded **illusory** fields such as entanglement and quantum computer due to the **time gap** related to three-body helium. ( I understand their feelings well. )

But aiming at illusory ideas **forever**, means we admit only **unreality** and "Shut up and calculate !" forever, which **obstructs** the development of science.

Even now, **Teaching** illusory fields to new students are having **bad** effects on their future.

Neglecting actual proof means these are **NOT** science.

*(Fig.17) What does the "failure" of string theory mean ? *

Unfortunately, the present physics has already reached their limits.

In this **distorted** situation, unless you believe unreal string theory, you cannot succeed in physical world.

( Of course, 10 or 11 dimensions are **impossible**. )

For example, in IT or internet industry, they are very **useful** for our daily living, so they can expand **employment**, even if they cannot be professors in university.

But in unreal and **useless** fields such as string theory, general relativity and entanglement, they cannot stabilize their lives if they cannot get some special **educational** posts ( or science writers ).

The problem is that they **continue** to teach students, for example, something related to relativity, **hiding** its fatal paradoxes even now.

*(Fig.18) If "Shut up and calculate !" state continues for more than 100 years ....*

You may ask some questions such as " What are the **shape** and size of a **photon** ? ",

" How each spin particle **feels** spooky link ? ", " Electron in 1s orbital really **crushes** into nucleus ? ".

But they just repeat conventional words " Shut up and calculate ! ", and these **abnormal** questions and answers have continued for as much as **100** years !

Do you think it is natural that various **serious** problems are happening in various fields in these extremely long-term **abnormal** situations ?

*(Fig.19) Present biological technologies already reach the limits.*

Unfortunately, the present biological technologies using DNA, RNA, cultured cells, protein interaction by antibodies have already **reached** their limits.

Actually, we **cannot** cure various serious diseases such as cancer, autoimmune disease, ALS, and dementia.

Different from antibiotics against bacteria, these serious diseases such as cancer, HIV ( → CD4 ), and autoimmune disease are generated from **our own** tissues.

So we need to **distinguish** and manipulate at **nano** ( electron ) levels to cure these diseases.

Unfortunately, the present biotechnology is **too macro** things to deal with these disease.

And we need to know and control various electron's **motion** patterns, giving up **unuseful** uncertainty principle and quantum chemistry.

*(Fig.20) How antiparticles distinguish and adhere to their particles ?? *

In **real** science, the instant we know the leukocytes adhere to blood vessels, we **naturally** try to investigate what adhesion factors ( LFA, ICAM-1 ) are related.

But they **NEVER** try to investigate these **adhesion factors** between electron and positron ( and proton and antiproton ), though as much as **80** years have passed since positron was discoverd.

As shown in this page, unstable antiparticles can be naturally **replaced** by electron, proton, and neutron **captures**.

And it is unnatural that very **stable** electron's energy (= mc^{2} ) is **not** negative.

"**Not asking**" for very long term means they **admit** these concepts are only **mathematical** things.

Unfortunately, this is what the present physics is.

2013/4/28 updated. Feel free to link to this site.