*(Fig.1) Quantum mechanics gives unreal hydrogen model with spin ↓*

Bohr model first succeeded in explaining hydrogen energy levels, and was replaced by quantum mechanics in 1920s.

Surprisingly, quantum mechanics requires that s orbitals (= ground state ) have zero angular momentum ( this p.2 ). ←Electrons often **hit** nucleus ?

Magnetic moment of hydrogen atom is known to be equal to Bohr magneton, which was first predicted by Bohr model.

But the quantum mechanical hydrogen with **zero** angular momentum cannot generate the magnetic moment.

This is the reason why they fabricated artificial spin, which cannot be spinning realistically.

*(Fig.2) Point-like electron ( radius r → 0 ), rotation v → ∞*

Angular momentum is given by mv × r ( v = velocity, r = radius ).

Electron spin also has angular momentum 1/2ħ, they claim

The problem is an electron is very tiny, point-like.

The point-like particle means its radius r is almost **zero**.

So to get the angular momentum 1/2ħ, the electron spinning must far exceed light speed ( this p.5, this )

So the electron spin lacks reality.

Even Pauli ridiculed the idea of "spinning electron".

But in "s" orbital of Schrodinger's hydrogen, this electron spin is the **only** generator of magnetic moment.

So they had **no** choice but to accept this strange spin ( **Not** as real spinning and speed ).

*(Fig.3) Quantum mechanics claim electrons have zero angular momentum !*

Quantum mechanics claims an electron in hydrogen atom has zero orbital angular momentum. It means the electron always **crashes** into nucleus in hydrogen ?

Furthermore, they claim **Helium** has two *hydrogen*-like orbitals (= 1s ) with zero angular momentum ( this p.3 below ).

It means two electrons in Helium also **hit** the nucleus ? These quantum mechanical Helium models are clearly **unstable** and *unrealistic*, so wrong.

It's impossible that Schrodinger equation gets the "right" Helium wavefunction. Instead, they just "choose" fake solution.

*(Fig.4) Electron spin up and down cause magnetic field ?*

In Stern-Gerlach experiment, they got some atoms through magnetic field to measure the magnitude of magnetic moment of each electron.

Surprisingly, the experiments showed that the magnitude of magnetic moment of electron spin is just **equal** to Bohr magneton in Bohr's classical orbit ( this p.4 )

We can safely say Stern-Gerlach experiment proved the magnetic property in Bohr's orbit ( **Not** unreaslitic spin ! )

*(Fig.5) Spin magnetic energy= 0.001 eV vs Pauli repulstion = 30 eV*

Stern-Gerlach experiment showed electron spin has the magnetism equal to Bohr magneton.

From this measured magnetic moment, we can get the **magnetic** interaction between two electron spins.

This spin-spin magnetic energy is very **weak** (= about **0.001 eV** ), compared with repulsive energy required for Pauli exclusion principle (= **30 eV** ).

It means spin magnetic moment has **nothing** to do with Pauli exclusion principle, and they created *artificial* concept such as "exchange force" ( this p.7, this p.6 ).

After finding the magnitude of electron spin **disagreed** with strong Pauli principle, they fabricated artificial new force (= exchange ? ). ← this is **NOT** a science !

*(Fig.6) Depending on electrons' position, up-up spins are more stable !*

Quantum mechanics claims Helium atom has a pair of "up" and "down" electron spins. But in fact, this Helium model is **inconsistent** with electron's spin

They claim electron spin is a tiny **magnet** causing *magnetic* field aroud it. Spin's directions **change** depending on two electrons' **positional** relasionship !

Magnetic source always includes a pair of N and S poles, which generates magnetic field lines around it.

To retuen from N to S pole, the magnetic field must include two **opposite** directions ( upward and downward ).

In Fig.6 left, when two spin directions are the **same** (= up-up ), they are more **stable**, because the spins are *aligned along* magnetic field !

So it's **impossible** to keep a pair of spins up-down of two Helium electrons.

*(Fig.7) Double-slit experiments proved electron's de Broglie wavelength.*

In de Broglie relation, electron's wavelength λ is given by **λ = h/mv**, where m and v are electron's mass and velocity.

This important matter-wave relation was confirmed in various experiments such as doube-slit, Davisson-Germer and this.

So there is **No** room for doubt that this de Broglie wave is *true*.

In these experiments, an electron is driven out from **destructive** interference regions by the "force" of de Broglie wave ( this p.25 )

This strong "**expelling** force" by de Broglie wave interference **can** explain strong Pauli exclusion force !

*(Fig.8) Opposite de Broglie wave phases (= ± ) kick out an electron.*

Double-slit experiment showed an electron is de Broglie **wave** where the *opposite* wave phses (= ± ) **cancel** each other.

It means when the opposit wave phases interfere with each other "destructively", the electron is "**kicked out**" from it.

This strong evidence means the electron's de Broglie **wave** interference must be actually working in "real" Helium atom casing strong Pauli exclusion principle.

*(Fig.9) Quantum orbit satisfies an integer times de Broglie wavelength.*

Only Coulomb force is insufficient to explain why atomic energy levels are quantized, and why an electron doesn't fall into nucleus.

Bohr model succeeded in getting actual atomic energies, proposing each orbit is an integer times de Broglie wavelength, as well as Schrodinger's hydrogen .

An integer multiple of de Broglie wavelength means an electron can **avoid** destructive interference and be stable.

Without this de Broglie wave, each electron can be attracted to positive nuclei, until they **stick** to each other and its energy is **unlimitedly** lower !

So the repulsive force by electron's de Broglie wave is **strong** enough to keep the electron away from the nucleus and cause Pauli exclusion force.

*(Fig.10) Electron's de Broglie wave in Schrodinger' hydrogen is destroyed*

Electron de Broglie wave with experimental proof **contradicts** quantum mechanical atomic model.

Quantum mechanics claims that electrons in Hydrogen and Helium have zero orbital angular momentum, which means "**linear**-shaped" orbital.

If so, the opposie phases in electron's de Broglie wave always **overlap** and interfere with each other "destructively" (= cancel ).

As you see, zero angular momentum in quantum mechanical atoms is *inconsistent* with de Broglie theory, so **false**.

*(Fig.11) Opposite phases of two de Broglie waves cancel each other*

In old Bohr's helium, **two** electrons are moving on the **opposite** sides of the nucleus in the *same* circular orbit (= **one** de Broglie wavelength ).

Considering Davisson-Germer interference experiment, *two* electrons of old Bohr's helium are clearly **unstable**.

**1**-de Broglie wavelength orbit consists of a pair of the opposite wave phases (= ±ψ ), which **cancel** each other by *destructive* interference.

Due to Coulomb repulsion between two electrons, one is always on the opposite side of another where the opposite de Broglie wave phases cancel each other.

Actually, old Bohr's helium of Fig.11 gives wrong ground state energy of helium, when you calculate it.

Old helium gives the total energy of **-83.33** eV, which is a little lower than the actual value of **-79.005** eV (= 1st + 2nd ionization energy of this ).

*(Fig.12) Actual Helium must avoid destructive interference.*

If two 1 × de Broglie wavelength orbits are in the same plane in old Bohr's helium model, their **opposite** wave phases cause **destructive** interference and vanish.

To **avoid** *vanishing* de Broglie's wave, two electron orbits in actual helium must be perpendicular to each other. Each orbit is **one**-de Broglie wavelength.

If the two orbits are **perpendicular** to each other, their wave phases are **independent** from each other and can be **stable**, not canceling each other.

This helium model considering actual de Broglie wave interference just agrees with experimental results of all atoms !

*(Fig.13) Hydrogen and Helium atoms.*

These orbits are all just *one de Broglie's wavelength*.

In this new helium, the two symmetrical orbits crossing perpendicularly are *wrapping the whole helium atom* completely.

The Bohr model hydrogen which has only one orbit, *can not* wrap the direction of the magnetic moment completely.

It is just **consistent** with the fact of the strong **stability** and the **closed** shell property of helium.

*(Fig.14) Two "opposite" wave phases cancel each magnetic field*

One-electron Hydrogen generates **magnetic** field, while two-electron Helium doesn't. Why ? We can explain it using **de Broglie** waves.

In "actual" Helium model, the *opposite* phases of two electron's de Broglie waves cross each other perpendicularly.

Because two electrons **repel** each other by Coulomb repulsion, an electron tends to approch the opposite phase ( where electron doesn't exist ) of another electron.

From a **distance**, the total magnetic field caused by electron's movement (= de Broglie wave ) is **cancelled** out to be zero by destructive interference.

So crossing between the *opposite* de Broglie wave phases is the reason why Helium has NO magnetic field.

*(Fig.15) 2 × de Broglie wavelength orbits. Each is a pair of opposite phases.*

One wavelength consists of a pair of "crest" (= + ) and "trough" (= - ) irrespective of transverse and longitudinal waves.

Here we suppose "**+**" phase contains an **electron** itself, and "**-**" phase is **compressed** by the electron's *movement*, --- which is " de Broglie wave ".

**2** × ( *1* × ) de Broglie wavelength orbit contains **two** ( *one* ) pairs of **±opposite** phases and **two** ( *one* ) midpoint lines.

These "**opposite**" wave phases **cancel** each other by *destructive* interference.

To avoid it, two orbits must cross **perpendicularly** in all atoms.

*(Fig.16) Orbits of Neon cross each other "perpendicularly".*

*(Fig.17) Orbits of Neon cross each other "perpendicularly".*

As shown on this page, we can show the appropriate new **Neon** model, in which orbits can cross each other "**perpendicularly**". "Perpendicular" crossing means they can **avoid** "*destructive*" interference.

*(Fig.18) Neon consists of 8 electrons (= 4 orbits with 2 wavelength )*

Helium with 1 × de Broglie wavelength orbits can contain the maximum **two** electrons (= **two** orbits ).

In this case, all two pairs of the opposite wave phases (= ± ) **cross** each other.
In 2 × de Broglie wavelength orbit, *Neon* can contain **8** electrons (= 2 × 4 orbits ).

Because as shown in Fig.18 lower, if there are four orbits (= eight electrons ), **all** eight pairs of the opposite de Broglie wave phases just **cross** each other.

It means the maximum valence electron's number is "eight" in 2 × de Broglie wavelength Neon. See this.

2016/9/2 updated. Feel free to link to this site.