*(Fig.1) Pseudoscience through Nobel prize is the "ultimate Globalism"*

It is said that Trump and Brexit are fighting with evil globalism. In fact, pseudoscience through **Nobel** prize is the *ultimate* form of harmful globalism.

Basic science must be the *common* concept in all countries. So if this basic science is wrong, all students in the world will be **damaged** by this **evil** globalism.

Now, the only theory of everything is 10 dimensional string theory. Hawking = guru of religious pseudosicence is just a political tool to stop Brexit.

Corrupt universities use Nobel prize and the media to **brainwash** people and justify their exorbitant tuition. *Reuters* giving false poll is also a globalist puppet.

Thomson Reuters this year predicts that **LIGO** gravitational wave or Cohen's **pseudo**potential method will win Nobel prize physics. But these are **useless** for our daily life.

*(Fig.2) Too weak gravitational wave is useless, a waste of money.*

Even if doubtful gravitational waves existed, they are competerly **useless** and waste of money, forever.

Even if we use very **long** detector ( which is as long as the distance between the earth and Sun ), it can detect only a slight distance change of a diameter of a *hydrogen* atom !

As you see, this gravitational wave is too **weak** to believe, and of course, **useless**, forever. Just a *waste* of money extorted from people !

Each government should notice the **evil** scheme of universities and the media to defraud people of their money, using "imaginary" target.

*(Fig.3) Black hole merger caused doubtful gravitational wave ?*

They say Einstein gravitational wave emitted from black hole collision has been finally detected by LIGO detector arm. If this is true, it will get *Nobel* prize.

But unfortunately, gravitational wave doesn't exist. They say gravitational wave just changed the LIGO 4km arm by only less than **1/1000th** the width of a proton.

Thinking commonsensically, this detection is impossible without *artificial* supposition, and the doubtful gravitational wave is **too weak** to believe.

*(Fig.4) LIGO 4km meter arm is stretched by only 10 ^{-18} meter ? ← doubtful !*

LIGO claims very weal gravitational wave stretched space, changing the 4km long arm by less than **1/1000th** the diameter of a *proton*.

LIGO detector is a L-shaped interferometer with two arms 4 kilometers long. Mirros are at the end of each arm, reflecting each light.

Laser light of a precise wavelength bounces back and forth inside it, and where the arms meet, the two beams overlap, interfere and just cancel each other.

If the length of one of arms slightly changes by gravitational wave, this light interference pattern changes, which can be detected ?

But this length change is less than a *proton* diameter ( < 10^{-18} meter ) for a very short time ! **Electrons** inside this interferometer are moving around much **larger** area than this.

Light is reflected mainly by electrons moving around much larger area than 1/1000th the width of a proton, so this detection of gravitational wave is too **weak** to believe, **lacking** reality.

*(Fig.5) Gravitational wave is fake "pseudo-tensor", so self-contradiction.*

Though the media tends to say gravitational wave proved great Einstein prediction, it's completely wrong and misleading.

In fact, gravitational wave is called "pseudo-tensor", which is **Not** Einstein true tensor in his general relativity.

Gravitational wave has **nothing** to do with Einstein general relativity. On the contrary, gravitational wave contradicts Einstein general relativity !

Gravitational wave pseudotensor can be artifically, freely chosen out of many **choices**, so they are scientifically meaningless and useless.

So, boring cliche, "gravitational wave = Einstein's prediction !" is a big **lie**, and just the media hype.

*(Fig.6) Time stopping on black hole prevents its formation. *

The clock time stops on the surface of black hole from viewpoint of distant observer ( on **earth** ).

So it needs **infinite** time to form black hole from collapsed star.

It means black hole does **Not** exist now, different from this claim.

Black hole is one of the largest **scams** in science history ( this myth #2 ).

But if they give up black hole, physicists would have nothing to do in Einstein relativity. This is the reason *unreal* black hole survives.

*(Fig.7) Detecting doubtful wave is worth a huge amount of money ? *

Gravitational wave is too **weak** to confirm, and of **No** practical use.

Then why did LIGO team annouce such an unrealistic wave ?

LIGO was cofounded mainly by Caltech and MIT, which have spent a **large** amount of money (= *$ 620 million* ! ), tax to detect this gravitational wave.

So it is **not** allowed to leave gravitational waves undetected, even if they **didn't** exist. This is the reason why they had to tell a lie.

LIGO have searched for elusive gravitational wave since 2002.

And they claimed gravitational wave could be detected for very short time.

But this gravitational wave is so weak that it changed slightly the LIGO arm by just 1/1000 of a proton diameter, they said.

Do you think this extremely weak and rare gravitational wave is really worth a huge amount of cost of *$ 620 million* ?

This **wasted** money originates from rising tuition and our tax.

Is it allowable ?

*(Fig.8) We must use experimental data to predict "real concept" !*

In the present quantum mechanics, even when we get some new experimental **data**, we **cannot** use them to clarify real mechanisms !

Instead, quantum mechanics forces us to use these data to create **artificial** quasiparticle, effective mass .. So our science stops its progress.

This is a very *serious* problem. We must address it immediately not to increase more educational victims under **false** science.

*(Fig.9) Quantum mechanics cannot handle multi-electron atoms → fake potential*

Thomson Reuters predicts that Cohen introducing empirical pseudo potential method may get Nobel prize physics. But this pseudo-potential is just "**fake**" potential and useless.

Schrodinger equation in quantum mechanics cannot solve **multi**-electron atoms. They just choose
fake artificial trial wavefunction.

Solids consist of a large number of atoms. Quantum mechanics tries to treat the whole metal including **multi-**electrons as "**one**-electron approximation" ( this p.2 ).

Of course, this one-electron model representing the whole atom is fake and **unreal**. So they introduced a new artificial concept "pseudopotential".

*(Fig.10) Pseudopotential is artificially and empirically determined*

Quantum mechanis tries to treal multi-electron solid as "fake **one**-electron model" ( this p.4 ) with fake *pseudo*-potential ( this 2.6 ).

In this **unreal** one-electron model, its pseudopotential has to be determined **empirically**, which means it's based on experimental data ( **NOT** from quantum mechanics itself ).

Furthermore, efffective electron mass in this "fake one-electron model" is unreal and artificially determined, too.

So the present solid physics **doesn't** rely on the original quantum mechanics, so it is useless and meaningless, and dispoves quantum mechanics.

*(Fig.11) ↓ Electron mass becomes much smaller inside solids !?*

Quantum mechanics can only show each as electron as abstract symbol. Then how can they describe more **complicated** phenomena ?

Surprisingly, they introduced unrealistic concepts such as "effective mass" in materials to explain various phenomena.

This "effective mass" **lacks** reality like quasiparticle, because that **mass** can be negative ! See various effective mass smaller than electron's mass ( this p.9 ).

The Science paper showing Majorana quasiparticle uses **unreal** effective mass of (= **0.015 m _{e}**, m

*(Fig.12) ↓ Quantum mechanics cannot describe real phenomena.*

Actual materials contain almost infinite atoms and electrons.

So it's **impossible** to express those materials only by *abstract* symbols.

This is the reason why quantum mechanics **discards** real physical concepts. Instead, it relies on "fake" concepts such as "quasiparticle" and "effective mass".

In fact, **all** other g-factor and *spin-orbit* are **fake**. Effective mass, g-factor, spin-orbit constant are all "unreal" ( this p.3 and this p.8 ).

2016/9/30 updated. Feel free to link to this site.