(Fig.1) ↓ Fake mass and fake spin in quantum mechanics
Quantum mechanics tries to explain all metals using unreal quasiparticles with fake (= effective ) mass, which can be negative or zero.
Researchers changed conductivity of some insulator by electric field. The last of news says "important step to realizing ?" ← still unrealized, useless.
This news claims they could change electric property of some metal by magnetic field through unreal spin-orbit inteaction and quasiparticle ( this middle ).
Spin-orbit interaction is fake. The ratio of magnetic moment to angular momentum is called "spin g-factor", which cannot exceed "2".
But this research uses fake (= effective ) spin-g-factor which is much larger (= 210 instead of 2 ! this p.10 ).
The last of this news uses vague phrases "it may one day .. We don't understand everything .." ← still useless, nothing realized.
In this way, quantum mechanics tries to explain macroscopic phenomena such as electro-magnetic property using unreal concepts, which are useless, forever.
(Fig.2) ↓ The media's misleading phrases 
Quantum computer, which needs fantasy parallel worlds to compute faster (← ? ), is still useless, Not replacing the ordinary computer at all.
To hide this science scam = quantum computer, the media try to use very "confusing phrases" to deceive readers.
This news says "the findings could have practical application in quantum computing ?", which means it has Not yet realized "imaginary" quantum computer now.
This news also uses vague phrases "Quantum computers could .. However there is still a long way to go .." ← still useless.
The last of this news says "the work could have impacts on the future computing ?" ← still useless. They just investigated interaction between light and material.
The latter part of this news just says "results highlight the benefits of understanding spin-orbit.. ?" "goal is to produce 10-qubit prototype by 2022 .. ?" ← still useless.
Their spin-orbit model is based on fake electron mass and adjustable fake spin g factor ( this p.6 )
This news says "This breakthrough has the potential .. ?" ← still useless.
Their "semiclassical" spin model is too simple, too abstract to be useful ( this p.12 ).
Quantum mechanics tries to explain superconductor using unreal quasiparticles. and fake gas and old useless spin model.
This news just says "high-temperature superconductors have the potential .. ?" ← still nothing realized, useless.
(Fig.3) Crashing gold atoms → quark-gluon plasma !? ← lie !
A recent news says they created quark-gluon plasma like BigBangs by colliding heavy atoms ?
This is fake news, because neither fractional-charge quark nor gluon can be separated. And BigBang in early universe is just speculation.
They pursue fictional particles. All they did was collide gold atoms and measure final real products such as protons and light.
Neither quark nor gluon can be seen. These are all fiction.
Quark-gluon plasma is too short and cannot be measured directly.
They rely on artificial model which claims some "momemtum" of final product indicates this ? ← No proof, just speculation.
Of course, these kinds of experiments full of imaginations are useless for our daily lives.
(Fig.4) ↓ Entanglement is nonsense, Not science !
"Using entangelemt to study protein ?" is fake news. Different from the media, entanglement sends no information faster-than-light.
Quantum entanglement (= spooky action ? ) can do nothing, it can not send any real informations. So useless, waste of money.
"Entanglement" is an "illusory concept" made up just for publishing journals or a tool of academia and the media to make money by fake science.
They just call "light interacting protein atoms" "entanglement". The last of this news just says "it may be possible .." "the group hopes .." ← still useless.
In the above figure, the source emits a pair of lights with the same polarization (= vertical or horizontal is unknown ) in the opposite directions.
When you know the light A is vertically polarized, it means light B is vertically polarized, too (= "instantly" determined ? so spooky ? ).
They just call this state as "polarized lights A and B are entangled !" ← Nonsense, Not science, this entanglement cannot be used for anything.
(Fig.5) Electron interaction term is freely chosen. ← useless
In larger atoms in condended matter physics, density functional theory (= DFT ) is the only computing method.
Unfortunately this DFT has No ability to predict any values, so useless.
Like this, DFT just chooses some convenient functional out of infinie choices.
In DFT, "exchange correlation functional" means interelectronic repulsions. This functional is unknown, can be freely determined ( this p.2 ).
So DFT can be considered a semi-empirical method. ( this p.23 ).
DFT is useless with No ability to predict atomic behavior.
This research tries to explain some metallic phase change under pressure using this useless DFT and unreal quasiparticle phonon ( this p.3 )
The last of this abstract says "Our results highlight the potential .. ?" ← still useless, nothing realized.
2018/12/14 updated. Feel free to link to this site.
+Functionals.jpg){kind=link}