- Criticize top journals. (21/ 6/11)

*(N-1) ↓ Fictional "science" published in the latest *

There is growing evidence that Covid-19 viruses were **artificially** created by Chinese lab instead of natural origin.

If Chinese officials were so confident the new coronavirus had natural origins, why did they need to deliberately delete the virus database ?

There is a strong possibility that the so-called "scientists", experts and almost all the media tried to desperately **suppress** the virus lab-leak theory, based on the dubious "scientific consensus", **cooperating** with Chinese government for expecting the large investment money pumped into their "science".

"Science" is just globalists' and dishonest authoritarian academia's convenient political tool to **hush** up the scandal, *brainwash* ordinary people or threaten any dissenters who challenge the so-called "mainstream science", as the old Church tried to hush up Galileo.

Prestigious academic journals such as Nature medicine, Lancet and Science also tried to **hide** the lab-leak idea as a conspiracy theory, **closing** their eyes to reality, intervened in the politics.

Covid-19 viruses are very **infectious**, easily *speading* among many people, so if Covid-19 was natural origin, many people all over the world had **already** been infected since a **long** time ago. But there was No such a natural virus.

Probably, Wuhan lab happened to create artificial infectious viruses by manipulating and changing DNA of the other virues found in the other **distant** location, then, lab researchers were easily infected by such very infectious artificial viruses and resultantly spread them.

The more important fact is the current so-called "mainstream science", "scientists" and prestigious academic journals turned out to be just a *political tool* spreading pseudo-science, **distorting** actual scientific facts.

Even after the **dubious** WHO report, the top journal **Nature** still *brushed off* the lab-leak theory, saying ( this p.2 right-upper ),

"it’s highly **unlikely** that a lab
would keep such information secret.. there’s a small chance that someone
**inadvertently** got infected by an unknown
virus while collecting bat samples in a **cave**."

If we leave all our "scientific decisions" up to the so-called (mainstream) "scientists" and journals, there is a **danger** they will *aritificially* create new **fictional** scientific fields such as "new mysterious viruses or universes of **unknown** origins or something" and successfully get all governments to waste taxpayers' money for "**imaginary** new science research", as they already did in fantasy parallel worlds, extradimensions, black hole, BigBang.. global warming.

The problem is all the current molecular biological researches tend to have only "**harmful** effects" with **little** benefits for us, hence, even if researchers artificially or accidentally create some harmful viruses, the current biology provides them with almost **No** tools for fixing or removing such harmful viruses.

All biological research tools or enzymes for manufacturing artificial viruses must be obtained from the **natural** ( or a little modified ) bacteria and viruses, because the current **useless** mainstream basic "science" called quantum mechanics cannot design or create artificial enzymes to cure diseases.

All the current molecular biological tools or enzymes obtained from natural bacteria, which work only under very **limited** conditions of labs, are completely **useless** for removing harmful viruses from human bodies.

One of bioresearch tools = restriction enzymes obtained from natural bacteria for inserting artificial DNA into viruses cut only the **specific** DNA sequence sites which cutting **traces** might tell us whether viruses were artificially created or not, compared with the past lab research papers or data, which were deleted by the authority unfortunately.

If Covid-19 was really **artificially** created in labs, this is the first "**unprecedented**" pandemic caused by artificially-created viruses, which did Not exist in the nature (= artificial viruses could "accelerate" the natural evolution speed unpredictably and dangerously ), hence, it may be unlikely that artificial viruses will disappear spontaneously someday or be controlled by our natural immune system induced by unpredictable vaccines.

Humans already have the **excellent** technology of observing and manipulating each **single** *atom* to construct any molecular nano-machines or artificial enzymes to cure the current intractable diseases or **remove** artificial viruses from human bodies, but the current "mainstream science" called quantum mechanics and academic journals **prevent** us from using realistic atomic tools or models.

For example, in the latest research published in the prestigious journal Nature communications ( this p.5, 8 ), physicists **outrageously** try to utilize **fictional** magnetic monopoles (= impossible objects = a north pole without a south pole or vice versa ) for **imaginary** modern-day computing magnetic nanostructures (← Never happen ).

The 3-5th paragraphs of this same fictional monopole research news says

"These single pole magnets, also known as magnetic monopoles, do not exist in nature; when every magnetic material is cut into two it will always create a new magnet with a north and south pole.."

".. However, in recent years physicists have managed to produce **artificial** (= *fake* ) versions of a magnetic monopole (← **lie** ) through the creation of two-dimensional spin-ice materials."

↑ In fact, this so-called "**artificial** monopole" is **Not** a real monopole but just a fictitious quasiparticle ( this p.1 center ), so scientifically **meaningless**.

The 3rd-last paragraph of this news says

"These magnetic **monopoles** are **not** real particles, like electrons and protons, but they are referred to as **quasi**-particles, because they appear from the *collective behavior* of surrounding atoms and electrons and they effectively interact with each other."

↑ This means the current mainstream quantum mechanics **refuses** to explain electromagnetic phenomena of materials using real particles, instead, it forces physicists to rely on **fictitious** quasiparticles which *pseudo*-models **prevent** us from using real atomic tools or models to cure diseases forever.

Physicists just artificially "defined" and *fabricated* **fake** magnetic **monopole** *quasiparticle* models by observing some atomic magnetic alignments, which do Not include real magnetic monopoles at all. ( this p.5, quantum mechanics likes to explain atomic internal magnetic field by unreal electron's "spins" instead of realistic electron's orbital motion )

Of course, these fictitious monopole quasiparticles, which *ghost* particles do **Not** exist in this real world, are **useless** for any practical purpose except for misleading people or governments into spending taxpapers' money for their illusory future "science".

This is why the last paragraph of this news uses just **vague** expressions,

" Since the **monopoles** can be moved around the 3D lattice using a magnetic field it **may** be possible to create a true 3D storage device based upon (fictional) *magnetic charge* ?" ← The **speculative** word "**may**" means their fictitious monopole quasiparticle research is still **useless**, realizing **nothing** meaningful now.

There are many such **dubious** research papers or news **falsely** treating fictional unphysical objects as "imaginary future promising technology" published in academic journals.

The last paragraph of this other latest dubious physics news published in the top journal Nature claims

" they also suggest topological insulators as a **promising** material class for **future** electronics and information processing.. explore novel *relativistic* effects .. in **future** high-tech applications."

↑ The use of uncertain dubious **future** words such as "promising" means this latest physics research is also still **useless**, realized nothing now.

What does this Nature article's "relativistic effect" for **future** as-yet-unseen high-tech application mean ?

The 2nd paragraph of this same Nature news says

"On their surfaces, **electrons** *behave like* **massless** particles moving almost like light ?" ← This is an **unrealistic** *pseudo*-science !

As you know, a **real** electron has the **definite** mass, **Not** massless at all.

So their *fictitious* **massless** electron is one of **unreal** quasiparticles called "Dirac fermions."

This fictitious massless Dirac electron is said to use the so-called relativistic effect, which is unrealistic.

The 5-6th paragraphs of this site say

" Dirac fermion **quasiparticles** travel at this **effective** (= fake ) speed of light.. The researchers achieved a transition between massless and massive **quasiparticle** states by distorting the lattice, a process that is analogous to how the Higgs field acts in particle physics ?"

Einstein relativity claims any **massless** particles must always move at the *maximum* light speed c.

But this fictitious massless Dirac quasiparticle is said to "move" 300 times **slower** than the light speed c, which clearly **contradicts** the original Einstein relativistic theory ( this p.3 right upper ).

So the current **mainstream** theories published in top journals are self-**contradictory** and *false*.

These massless Dirac fermions or **quasiparticles** are completely **useless** for any future (imaginary) technology, because physicists just fabricate **fake** quasiparticle model, artificially manipulate parameters such as fake effective masses ( this p.3 left ) of one pseudo-particle approximate model called density functional theory ( this p.7 ).

The 2nd paragraph of this other latest physics news published in Nature group journal npj also **falsely** claims

"The study, published in npj Quantum Materials, **may** be a step toward the implementation of a long-living quantum memory ?"

↑ The vague dubious *future* words such as "**may**" and "a **step** toward" mean this latest research still has **Not** realized anything useful now, instead, talking only about as-yet-unseen future or **imaginary** quantum memory, which will **never** be put to practical use.

Their research will be meaningless, useless **forever**, because they try to use fictitious **quasiparticle** model called polaritons embedded in unphysical band model to explain some physical phenomena in vain ( this p.2 Fig.2 ).

The first paragraph of this other latest news on fictional quantum computers also misleadingly claims

".. an important step toward a scalable quantum computer. Their results are published in the scientific journal Nature"

↑ Again, the frequent use of **imaginary** *future* word "a **step** toward" means this research still has Not realized any practical quantum computers.

Correctly, their so-called quantum computers are still **Not** computers or calculators at all.

The last paragraph of this same news says

".. showcased using a **two**-*qubit* (= two quantum bits ) quantum algorithm ?"

↑ It means this latest top journal Nature research used only **two** bits (or qubits, this p.2-5 ) for their as-yet-unrealized imaginary quantum computer, which are **far** from the practical computer that needs **billions** of bits or transistors as seen in the current PC.

Actually, fictional quantum computer research is **deadend** with **No** progress, as the 3rd paragraph of this recent news says

"Electrons trapped in quantum dots, semiconductor structures of only a few tens of nanometres in size, have been studied for more than two **decades** as a platform for quantum information. Despite all promises, scaling beyond **two**-qubit logic has remained **elusive**."

↑ Despite very long time research (= more than decades ), this silicon-type quantum computer (= still **Not** a computer at all ) can have only a **few** bits or qubits, which are far **inferior** to the current practical classical computer with billions of bits or transistors.

This **hopeless** quantum computer *pseudo*-science needs a lot of **fake** or exaggerated news to pop up almost every day in order just to make their fruitless deadend researches on fictional parallel-world quantum computers "**appear**" to be promising or progressing day by day (= actuall, **Not** ).

For example, this latest CNBC fishy news just *vaguely* says

"It’s **still** an incredibly **young** field (= forever ) of research, however firms from Google to IBM believe quantum computing **will** become a reality in the **next** decade (= **never** happen )"

".. Quantum computers **will** be able to do specific tasks much faster than classical machines and that **could** be a problem for today’s encryption standards ?"

↑ The frequent misuse of multiple *dubious* **future** words such as "**will**", "**could**" and "**next**" means their fishy quantum computers are still **illusion** and useless (forever).

The 5th paragraph of this latest Reuters news also just uses **vague** phrases,

"Researchers **believe** quantum computers **could** operate millions of times faster than today’s advanced supercomputers, **potentially** making possible tasks ranging from mapping complex molecular structures (← **lie** )"

↑ *Uncertain* **future** words such as "believe", "could", "potentially" mean **nothing** has been realized yet according to their news.

The phrase "joint venture" which sounds "practical businesslike", is intentionally used only to give **false** impression that (fictional) quantum computers may be put to practical use someday (← **never** happen ).

As you see, under the current **fraudulent** so-called "*mainstream* science" based on **fictional** quantum physics and fantasy parallel universes, physicists had No choice but to use their **useless** science only for irrelevant "political purpose".

Fantasy parallel-world quantum computers, extra-dimensions, multiverse, quasiparticles .. are all **useless** except for writing meaningless articles, repeating the old same lectures, political tools, or selling books calling meaningless equations "God equations" or something ← The current "science" is just *superstitious* "religion" ?

Listen to (pseudo-)science !

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ Computer transistors did Not use *

What if the present mainstream "science" is just **fake**, and all people across the world have been **deceived** and brainwashed with the **wrong** textbooks under the name of "education" ?

All the media and academia repeatedly spread the **false** idea that quantum mechanics was *indispensable* for modern computer technology, trying to make the **useless** quantum mechanics **look** useful.

In fact, the fantasy quantum mechanics was completely **unnecessary**, having **nothing** to do with the modern computer technology.

Computer CPU and memory can recognize only very simple and **primitive** binary information 0 or 1 represented by a tiny electronic switch called transistor.

Each transistor consists of a central p-type semiconductor (= called "base" ) sandwiched between two n-type semiconductors (= called "emitter" and "collector" ).

N and p-type semiconductors are made of silicon doped with different impurities or atoms with different numbers of valence electrons.

Due to the different numbers of valence electrons of impurity atoms included in silicon, electrons can flow only in one direction from n-type semiconductor (= excessive electrons ) to p-type semiconductor (= deficient electrons or excessive holes ) even under applied voltage.

So in this ordinary n-p-n semiconductor transistor including p → n direction, electrons cannot flow as electric current, even if some amount of voltage is applied to both ends of two n-type semiconductors.

Only when the new voltage is applied to the central p-type semiconductor (= base ), electrons can gain momentum, pass through the central p-type semiconductor's barrier and flow from emitters (= n ) to collectors (= n ) as a large electric current. See this middle.

In this transistor switch, whether a new voltage is applied to the central p-type semiconductor ( or base ) determines whether the electronic current flows or not, which determines the electronic charge is accumulated in a memory capacitor or not.

↑ As you see, this transistor mechanism just obeys simple "**classical** electromagnetics" where electrons particles are accelerated and **moving** by ordinary *Coulomb* electric force, which can**not** be described by unrealistic **static** quantum mechanical electron cloud or wavefunction.

Strangely, even the present textbooks always use the **classical** (= realistic ) Bohr's atomic model with actually moving electron particles to explain the mechanism behind the transistor semiconductor and its atomic structure instead of quantum mechanical unphysical electron cloud model which tells us **nothing** about the detailed mechanism at all.

Unrealistic quantum mechanical electrons expressed as ambiguous electron clouds spreading over all space cannot even move or be localized to one particular place to cause a real electric current.

Transistor switch, which should be changing rapidly between 0 ↔ 1 by actually moving electrons, does **Not** happen or work under nonphysical quantum mechanical **static** electron cloud model.

So it is intrinsically **impossible** for such a fictional quantum mechancal electron or unrealistically static electron cloud wavefunction vaguely spreading all over space to explain the actual **dynamic** electrons' motions of the current computer transistors.

Then, how do physicists **falsely** claim such an unrealistic quantum mechanics full of fantasy concepts contributed to the modern computer transistor technology ? ← an **insane** and baseless idea

This middle part explains

"*Transistors* are fabricated from materials known as semiconductors, in which charge-carrying electrons are only allowed to occupy certain discrete energy levels, as determined by *quantum physics* (← **lie** ). As more electrons are added they form allowed "bands" in a prescribed manner.."

".. The resultant energy bandstructure, which can be modified by applying voltages to wires connected to the device, gives rise to the switching behavior from which we build fundamental electrical elements.."

".. Without quantum mechanics we would have no understanding of semiconductors, could not have engineered the transistor (← **lie**, again ), and thus would have no microprocessors ?"

First of all, this seemingly "excellent" quantum mechanical **non**physical band model can **Not** even treat a **real** electron with real **fixed** mass or charge. ← So quantum mechanics does Not have real tools or real electrons from the beginning.

It's much more **impossible** for such a quantum mechanical pseudo-electron model to explain actual transistor's underlying mechanism in a realistic way based on real moving electrons.

The quantum mechanical band model outrageously **replaces** all real dynamical electrons inside materials or semiconductors by one single **fictitious** free quasi-electron with **fake** effective mass (= even unreal negative mass is possible according to crazy quantum mechanics ). ← Very rough and false quantum mechanical approximate model ( this p.15 ).

This fictitious quantum mechanical electron artificially and **wrong**ly replacing real mass by **unreal** effective masses is said to be "moving" at **fictitious** velocities or quasi-momentum ( this p.2 ) only inside the imaginary quantum band-structure world. ← a meaningless **ghost**-particle model

↑ All these pseudo-concepts were artificially *fabricated* in order just to make intrinsically-**useless** quantum mechanics explain actual complicated physical phenomena inside materials or semiconductors.

There are fatal and irreparable problems in the quantum mechanical unphysical wavefunction or fuzzy **static** electron clouds, which abstract wrong model tells us **nothing** about the detailed mechanism of what actually happens inside various materials.

Quantum mechanical electron cloud or wavefunction must always **spread** all over space with No definite shape or boundary, hence, such an uncertain electron cloud with No concrete electrons localized in particular positions can **Not** be moved or manipulated by ordinary electromagnetic force or applied voltage. ← Quantum mechanics cannot be used as a transistor switch !

Physicists were unscientifically forced to dismiss and replace the whole actual **many** electrons inside semiconductors by **one** big **pseudo**-electron or band model with **fake** effective mass and *quasi*-crystal momentum, **ignoring** all multi-electron effects ( this 2nd paragraph ), in order to turn originally-unmovable static quantum mechanical electron cloud into a fictitious quasi-electron seemingly movable with fake masses and fake momentums.

The 5th paragraph of this site says

"Firstly, *band* structures for most solids can**not** be obtained *analytically*. Rather, scientists and engineers use the (fictitious) **effective** mass to develop **simple** models for charge carrier behavior in semiconductor devices, that **avoid** the detailed physics (= **avoid** delving into detailed true mechanisms )"

↑ So physicists have already **admitted** quantum mechanical model is **useless**, and given up explaining the detailed semiconductor's behavior analytically. → Fake electrons with unreal effective mass model is used, which cannot predict any real physical phenomena based on real electrons' motion.

Even Nobel laureates Shockley = one of founders of the modern computer transistors *admitted* **unrealistic** concepts were used in quantum mechanics (= hence, he did **Not** rely on such an unrealistic quantum mechanical model for inventing transistors ) in his
Nobel lecture ( this p.14-15 )

"..they are **not** yet adequately explained quantitatively. The **discrepancy** between simple *theory*
and experiment probably results from the **complex** structure of the energy
surfaces for holes and electrons, that is, from deviations from the single (fake) **effective**-mass model of semiconductors.."

"..It was
**difficult** at the time to interpret these procedures from an **atomic** point of
view and this is still true at present."

↑ So even the inventor of modern computer transistors, Shockley knew the existing quantum mechanical theory could Not explain any experimental results (= which is why there was a clear **discrepancy** between the theory and experiments ), even after a single pseudo-electron's effective mass approximate band model was artificially created.

In Nobel lecture ( this p.10 ) of another pioneer of transistor, Bardeen also said

"electrons and holes thought of as classical particles with an (fake) **effective** *mass* of the same order, but **differing** from
the *ordinary* electron **mass**. The **effective** mass is often *anisotropic*, and **different** for different directions of motion in the crystal (← impossibly changeable masses in different directions ! ) "

↑ He said obviously **unrealistic** things = unlike the real **fixed** electron's mass,
such an unrealistic effective mass of a fake electron inside quantum mechanical unphysical band model can *magically* **change** in different directions !

Each electron inside semiconductors is influenced by many other atoms and electrons through various Coulomb potential energies.

But quantum mechanical pseudo-model has **No** ability to take account of such complicated potential energies or interactions caused by actual multiple electrons inside semiconductors.

↑ Such an useless quantum mechanics had No choice but to **give up** thinking about all real electrons and potential energies, and instead, outrageously treat all real electrons inside semiconductors as one big **fake** free electron with fake effective mass moving at fictitious velocities (= called crystal momentum ) inside the **imaginary** band-model world.

Hence, this quantum mechanical illusory model relying on fake electron's effective masses, fake charges and momentums in the band structure was **unable** to predict any real physical phenomena of semiconductors, much less contributed to modern computer technology.

This is why Shockley had to take a great deal of time **enduring** classic trials and errors, until he luckily found a miracle way or candidate for practical transistors, because the existing quantum mechanical theory was **useless**, telling him **nothing** about how to do next ( this p.1 left top, this p.1 middle-lower ).

Bardeen was also **betrayed** by quantum mechanical predictions (= there is No such thing as quantum mechanical prediction, though ), as this site ( p.19 left-lower ) says

"The results they found
along the way were obtained by an admixture of
**accident**, brilliant insight and **luck** .... The fact that the
results were the **reverse** of what they had *expected*
initially in the given case.."

Also in Shockley's later books, he admitted impractical quantum mechanics allowed physicists to use only **fake** electron model with unreal effective mass or crystal momentum (= fake velocity ) to think about any semiconductors' or transistor's mechanism ( this site is heavy, p.120, p.175 ), after he discovered the modern transistors by classical trial and error approach **without** relying on quantum mechanics like Edison and Wright brothers' discovery.

As long as we **ignore** underlying reality and **blindly** continue to rely on the current nonphysical quantum mechanical stupid band theory with **unreal** electron effective mass or quasiparticle model, our science technology including computers has **No** future, No hope, with **No** more technological progress.

Sadly, creating "**illusory** future technology" to deceive taxpayers and governments to get research funds becomes the only choice for the current hopless mainstream pseudo-science.

This **fraudulent** *future* technology is the so-called quantum computers allegedly utilizing fantasy parallel worlds or superposition for as-yet-unrealized faster parallel computing.

The 1st and 2nd paragraphs of this **dubious** latest quantum computer news just vaguely says

".. that **will** allow the campus to focus on enabling scalable quantum computing..
Quantum computers are **expected** to greatly outperform the most powerful conventional computers on certain tasks ?"

↑ The frequent misuse of **fishy** future worlds such as "**will**" and "**expected**" means their quantum computers (= Not computers or calculators yet ) are still **illusion** and unrealized (forever).

The 2nd-last paragraph of this another latest misleading quantum computer news says

"The team is excited for "**future** applications" of their work.. They even envision **one day** integrating their entire experimental setup onto a chip that **could** be dipped into a biomaterial or water sample.. ?"

↑ They talk only about "**imaginary** *future*" again, **without** realizing anything useful by using many empty words "**future**" and "**could**."

Physicists just artificially try to define and use unreal electron's effective masses that do **Not** even exist, by wrongly treating electrons inside materials as **fake** free quasi-electrons and measuring their fictitious motions under various electromagnetic fields ( this p.9, this p.7 ).

↑ Instead of clarifying true underlying physical mechanism, the current physicists are **obsessed** only with artificially fabricating and manipulating **fake** electron's masses in **vain** forever. ← **No** more technological progress is expected in our "science", computers and medicine !

Fictitious theories need and spawned other fictitious theories or concepts to explain their fictitious mechanisms artificially. ← vicious cycle.

In order to explain fictitious band model with fake electrons, physicists artificially created various fake **ad-hoc** models (= irrelevant to the original useless quantum mechanical Schrödinger equation ).

These fake ad-hoc quantum mechanical approximate models for illogically explaining semiconductor's band energies or fake electron's effective mass include **pseudo**-potential approximation ( this p.5 ) and various empirical meaningless models which just artificially **choose** and adjust band energy parameters ( this p.2, this p.3 2nd paragraph, this p.2 ) with No ability to predict anything.

Energy potentials or band energies of transistors, which vary depending on applied voltage magnitudes or materials and affect whether electronic current flow or not, must be expressed by such fake quantum mechanical models that just artificially manipulate unreal effective masses and band energies.

The most-widely used (fake) quantum mechanical approximate model is density functional theory (= DFT, this p.2 ) which popular **pseudo**-quantum model was introduced more than 10 years **after** Shockley luckily invented transistors **without** relying on any quantum mechanical impractical theories including band or DFT models ( this p.2 ).

This DFT approximate method is often called (**fake**) ab-initio or first-principle method. ← These misleading names are highly inappropriate, considering DFT is completely unrealistic, useless, **unable** to predict any actual multi-electron phenomena inside semiconductors.

Because this DFT method **unrealistically** replaces the entire many-electron material or semiconductor by one fake quasi-electron with fake effective mass compatible with unphysical band model with fake effective pseudo-potentials ( this p.5 ).

All these DFT free parameters such as one pseudo-electron wave function and pseudo-potentials
called "electron-correlation functionals" must be artificially chosen out of **infinite** choices. ← a meaningless quantum mechanical popular pseudo-model just deliberately "choosing" physical values with No ability to predict any new values.

It means DFT, which just artificially **chooses** fake electron's wavefunctions and potential energies, can **Not** explain or predict any physical phenomena inside semiconductors or computer transistors ( this p.17 ). ← Actually, this current most widely-used DFT method contributed **nothing** to modern technological innovation, because DFT was introduced in 1965 **after** transistors were invented in 1950.

As a result, all misleadingly "exaggerated" news and claims that quantum mechanics was useful (← ? ) for developing modern computer transistors or smartphones are just **false** and a total **lie**.

The current rampant coronaviruses may have been artificially created by Chinese lab. ← If it is true, Chinese government, almost all the world's media and the so-called "scientists" strangely cooperated to stifle the lab-leak virus idea as "conspiracy theory." ← What's their **true** purpose ?

There is a rumor that almost all academic **journals** refused to accept the latest research supporting the artificially-created virus theory. ← The current so-called "science" and academic journals are just "**political** tool" urging the world's scientists to do **harmful** researches with No benefits for us ?

Or has the current mainstream "science" itself been just a "fantasy conspiracy" theory ?

Whether the viruses were intentionally or accidentally spread is still unclear.

But if the viruses were really **artificially** created, it may be **hard** or unlikely that viruses will disappear spontaneously someday or humans' natural immune system ( whether by herd or unpredictable vaccines ) will get rid of any artificial mutant viruses luckily.

To tackle artificially-manufactured formidable viruses, that had not existed in the nature, we need to **artificially** *get rid of* such artificial viruses by understanding and artificially manipulating atomic interactions between viruses and bodies, using a real practical atomic model.

To do that, the current fantasy and useless quantum mechanical atomic theory is the largest **obstacle** to finding cures for diseases, hence it must be replaced by realistic practical atomic models as soon as possible, in order to prepare for next pandemic by artificial viruses.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(C-1) ↓ Fantasy quantum mechanics is Not used in *

Quantum mechanics has been useless in any applied science such as computer transistors and technology.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(M-1) ↓ Quantum computers are useless in *

Any quantum computers are still Not computers, completely useless.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ No calculation, just random quantum walk in * *?*

The current widely-used ordinary **useful** classical computer is made of more than billions of transistors or bits.

**Billions** of **bits** packed in one computer is **necessary** for a computer to become a useful computer or calculator by performing meaningful calculations for us.

It is reported that the leading quantum computer company IBM plans to have 1000-qubit (= qubit corresponds to "quantum" version of bit ) quantum computer by 2023. ← This as-yet-unrealized 1000-qubit quantum computer (= still **Not** computers, though ) will be still far **inferior** to the current useful classical computer made of billions of bits

Today's largest quantum computer is said to have only 60~70 qubits (= including unpublished doubtful ones ), which alleged quantum computers are completely **useless**, can**not** do any meaningful calculations that the ordinary classical computer we use can easily execute ( this 3rd-5th paragraphs ).

You easily see a huge amount of **fake** news deliberately *exaggerating* **hopeless** imaginary quantum computers, which will be **useless** forever, popping up almost every day, flooding the current media, confusing and misleading laypersons and governments in order to get taxpayers' money.

Quantum computer is allegedly based on ancient quantum mechanics which fantasy pseudo-science has unreasonably dominated and badly influenced the academia, science world and education for a long time.

Many giant corporations from incredibly many different sectors such as Big tech, smartphones, drugmakers, hospitals, carmakers, universities, environment, even giant financial banks 'united' under **fictional** parallel-world quantum computers, forming a strange global or world's government-like organization **controlling** all the media for getting the world's science budgets under the name of (fishy) science, climate change, vaccine or something.

If you **carefully** read all these 'fishy' quantum computer news, you will notice the so-called quantum computer is still **fiction**, can **Not** do any useful calculations, seeing the news media talking **only** about imaginary rosy future, which will never happen.

For example, the 1st-2nd paragraphs of this latest news just vaguely says

" a quantum computer that can solve large-scale business problems is **still** a prospect that belongs to the distant **future**..
But now researchers from US banking giant Goldman Sachs and quantum computing company QC Ware have designed new quantum *algorithms* (= Not computers ) that they say **could** significantly boost the efficiency of some critical financial operations – on hardware that **might** be available in only five years' time"

↑ So even in the latest news of fishy quantum computers, they just designed some "algorithm", and still have **Not** realized it using real quantum computers except in physicists' heads or imaginary uncertain future. ← Quantum computer is still **useless** (forever).

The current so-called "science" and "identity politics" are highly *politicized*, it's a mere "pretense" originating from the academia falsely believing in **fictional** parallel universes and unreal pseudo-particles as "science", which is substantially religion ?

Just *seemingly* increasing the number of quantum bits or qubits in order to falsely make the **useless** (= forever ) quantum computer "**look**" promising or progressing is **meaningless** and harmful to real science.

The world's leading IBM quantum computers are still useless and **Not** even computers or calculators. = Even very simple tasks of just oscillating 53 qubits between 0 and 1 (**without** any meaningful calculations) is impossible, causing a lot of errors.

IBM news reporters are especially "*good*" at skillfuly **hiding** true facts that their quantum computers still can do **nothing** meaningful.

For example, this latest *hyped* news misleadingly claims "IBM just solved this quantum computing problem 120 times **faster** than **previously** possible ?"

↑ The point is this news does **Not** claim
IBM quantum computers (= still Not computers ) can calculate faster than the current widely-used **classical** computers. ← It means their quantum computers are still **useless** and **Not** faster than the ordinary classical computers.

They just *vaguely* says "IBM solved a quantum problem 120 times faster than the **previous** time." ← It means if what they did in the "previous time" is a **meaningless** trifling thing, "120 times faster than such a meaningless calculation" is also **meaningless**, and makes No difference (= still useless for us ).

If you carefully read the news further, you will notice the 6th paragraph of the same IBM news says one real inconvenient fact,

"**Classical** computing **remains** a *fundamental part* of Qiskit, and of any quantum operation carried out over the cloud. A quantum program can effectively be broken down into two parts: using **classical** hardware, like a laptop.."

↑ So almost **all** calculations by IBM alleged quantum computers are carried out by the ordinary **classical** computers of billions of bits, because their quantum computers still consisting only of a very small number of bits (= only **seven** qubits, this 2nd paragraph ) can Not do any meaningful calculations.

The 3rd-last paragraph of this same fishy IBM quantum comptuer news just misleadingly says

"Qiskit Runtime **will** allow users to try out our powerful new quantum kernel alignment algorithm.. We recently used this *algorithm* to prove that quantum computers **will** demonstrate a rigorous speedup over classical computer.. ?"

↑ The use of the **confusing** future word "will" means their so-called quantum computers still can **Not** calculate faster than classical computers except in the *imaginary* **future** or "pie-in-the-sky" algorithm.

Then, what on earth can the current "largest quantum computers" (= still Not computers, though ), which research papers have been actually **published** in peer-reviewed journals, perform ?

This week, Chinese team published their latest research on the alleged world's largest quantum computer with **62** qubits in the prestigious top journal Science.

What has this world's largest quantum computer done ?

Could their 'machine' calculate any meaningful values ? ← Actually their quantum computers are still Not computers or machines, because they can**not** do any calculations.

The 6th paragraph of this news just vaguely says

"It is just like one or two particles **randomly** *moving* on an 8x8 chess board (= originally 64 qubits, but 2 qubits are broken, so 62 qubits ). Such **random** *quantum walks* can achieve anything that quantum computing can do.."

↑ In fact, this task of the so-called "quantum walks" is **Not** a kind of calculating something, so it is **Not** useful for any purposes.

In this **useless** *random* quantum walk, researchers are said to have just moved some "pseudo-particle" or **propagated** some vague "energy wave packets" (= which propagation of energy corresponds to flipping the next qubit's state from "0" to the excited "1" state, one after another, like **classical** wave propagating ) randomly on 62 qubits. ← That's all. **No** meaningful calculations have been performed.

↑ More precisely speaking, the movement of this energy wave packet transmitted by **classical** microwave light (= flipping qubits from 0 to 1 ) between qubits is not random, its energy propagating direction is **artificially** controlled by adjusting interactions between superconducting qubits (= using classical electromagnetic fields ).

This meaningless **random** quantum walk experiment has a resemblance to the recent quantum computer's supremacy (= actually No supremacy or quantum speed-up, so useless ) experiment, which just output random meaningless numbers **without** performing any meaningful calculations.

Qubits or superconducting circuits are coupled by one of **classical** light waves = microwave transmission line called resonators.

This **classical** microwave light can naturally propagate (= quantum walk ? ), interfere with each other and influence qubit's flipping ( 0 ↔ 1 ). ← This classical interference between qubits through classical microwaves is falsely treated as "quantum effect ( this 4th paragraph )" and used as the basis for calling them (fake) quantum computers in addition to their **fake** unseen superposition or parallel worlds.

This alleged world's largest quantum computer published in the latest prestigious top journal Science is completely **useless**, cannot do any meaningful calculations.

Actually, the last of this Science paper's abstract just *vaguely* says

"Our work is an essential milestone in the field, brings **future** larger scale quantum applications **closer** to realization on these noisy intermediate-scale quantum processors ?" **without** mentioning its any immediate practical applications.

↑ Just talking about **imaginary** *vague* future means they still have **Not** realized any useful quantum computers, much less performed any calculations faster than ordinary classical computers now.

Chinese team just excited one (or two ) initial qubits (= flipping qubit from 0 to 1 ) on the edge out of 62 qubits illuminated by classical microwave, and let the excited energy wave packet naturally travel (via microwave pulse) to other qubits which were flipped to "1" state, one after another, and eventually detected. ← That's all. **No** meaningful calculations have been done by their so-called largest quantum computers ( this Fig.2 and p.4 right ).

Actually their superconducting quantum computers, which are most widely used in many major quantum computer companies, have **No** history of performing tasks of calculating any meaningful values.

Two years ago, the same Chinese team did the same kind of meaningless random quantum walk experiment with 12 qubits (= also published in Science ), and they treated this energy wave packet transmitted via classical microwave (= like ordinary classical waves ) between qubits as some **fictitious** quasiparticle's propagation ( this p.2 right-upper ).

Relying on **fictitious** quasi-particles ( instead of real particles as a transmission of quantum computer ) means their seeming technology or research obstinately **refusing** to look at physical phenomena with real eyes or particles will **never** be useful or put to practical application.

Similar meaningless quantum walk experiments were done in other types of quantum bits using trapped ions where fictitious quasiparticles called "phonons", which is just some vibrating energy packet of ions or atoms, were said to propagate or walk through qubits as vibrating energy packets.

The 3rd-5th paragraphs of this news on the recent quantum walk experiment using only four ion qubits (= still Not computers ) just say

" while the **probability** of finding a particle at a certain location **spreads** out predictably over time, like ripples in pond, when you actually make a measurement there is inherent **uncertainty**. This makes *quantum random walks* fundamentally different.."

".. started by creating an artificial crystal by trapping a row of **four** calcium ions with **lasers** (= classical light wave ). The ions could still influence each other with their electric charge. Then, the team showed that they could start one ion **vibrating** by shining a separate **laser** on it."

"..This minimum possible *vibration*, called a **phonon** (= unreal quasiparticle ), acted like a packet of **energy** that could be **passed** to a *neighboring* **ion**.. By employing the capability to prepare and observe a localized phonon, its **propagation** in a four-ion linear crystal can be observed with single-site resolution. By waiting for various lengths of time up to 10 milliseconds, the phonon locations measured matched the theoretical predictions.."

↑ So all the **meaningless** "random quantum walk" experiments can do is just excite some initial quantum bit or qubit with classical laser light → this excited energy is **propagating** to neighboring qubits as a form of ion's vibration or microwave pulses (= just classical wave packet ), which are falsely treated as (fictitious) quasi-particles or quantum effects.

As a result, it is proved that even the current world's largest quantum computers (= still **Not** computers ) are completely **useless**, can calculate **nothing** except for doing **meaningless** tasks of transmitting some "energy wave (= classical light wave or vibration )" through qubits in random directions.

↑ It is named "quantum walk", but just classical wave energy propagation. Anyway, **No** quantum computer's speed-up or calculations have been done, so meaningless researches.

Actually, the last paragraph of this news just vaguely says

"The two-dimensional programmable quantum walks based on quantum computing have **potential** applications (← ? ) in quantum search algorithms, general quantum computing and other fields, and **will** be an important direction of subsequent development ?"

↑ The use of *dubious* **future** words such as "**potential**" and "**will**" means their quantum computer (= still Not computers ) has **Not** achieved any practical or faster calculations yet, now.

The fact that all the current quantum computer researchers focus **only** on such **meaningless** tasks instead of calculating something clearly shows such unscientific quantum computers proved to be intrinsically useless forever, and their **deadend** researches are hopeless with No progress, no matter how much time and money are wasted, or no matter how much fake news pops up everyday to exaggerate as-yet-unrealized fantasy quantum computers.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ Interference between parallel worlds = * *?*

All the current quantum computers are completely useless and hopeless forever. Quantum computer research substantially makes **No** more progress, except in a flood of **fake** news, which pops up almost every day.

The so-called quantum computers continually overhyped by almost all the media are still Not even computers, because they can**not** do any meaningful calculations.

Despite the obvious fact that quantum computers will be an **unrealized** illusory *ghost*-machine forever, you always see an incredible number of **fake** overblown news deliberately exaggerating only **imaginary** rosy **future** or dreamlike potential of quantum computer, which is actually **nothing**.

In fact, No matter what physicists do, it would **never** change the fact that realizing useful quantum computers is **impossible** forever.

Because the basic theory or (illusory) mechanism underlying quantum computers include many serious self-contradictions.

Quantum computer science **contradicts** not only real classical mechanics but also the original quantum mechanical theory itself.

In the original quantum mechanical stupid superposition or parallel-world theory, each particle such as an electron inside the wavefunction is supposed to exist in "*multiple* **different** places" simultaneoulsly when we do **Not** observe it (= of course, when we look at it, each electron must be **observed** to be in only **one** place even in the quantum mechanical superposition rule ).

↑ The point is the original quantum mechanical *superposition* assumes "parallel worlds in **different** places" instead of "parallel worlds in the same place", which causes a serious **contradiction** and discrepancy between (fictional) quantum computers and the original quantum mechanics.

Whether it is electron's de Broglie wave or light wave, when two waves enter the **same** *place*, those two waves **always** *overlap* and interfere constructively or destructively with each other **instead of** each electron ( or a photon particle ) keeping splitting and existing in multiple "unconnected" parallel worlds independently without interfering.

↑ This original quantum mechanical idea that each particle could coexist in **different** places (= **Not** the same place, because two waves in the same place always interact, **mix** and interfere with each other, invalidating the muitple independent parallel-world effect ) in different parallel worlds is **inconsistent** with quantum computer's superposition or new strange parallel worlds into which a single quantum bit or qubit allegedly splits "in the **same** place".

Each quantum bit or qubit of as-yet-unrealized quantum computers is said to magically take **two** states 0 and 1 *simultaneously*, different from ordinary classical computer's bit which is designed to take only 0 or 1 state at once.

This quantum computer's qubit is said to have some **occult** power enabling a *ghost* cat being dead and alive *simultaneously* splitting into two different fantasy parallel worlds.

↑ The crucial difference between two types of fictional parallel worlds of the original quantum mechanics and quantum computers is that the quantum computer qubit's parallel worlds (= two 0 and 1 parallel worlds in the **same** one **place** or the same **single** qubit ) and a dead-and-alive cat must coexist in the same place **independently** of other worlds, while we do not look at them, instead of interacting or interfering with other parallel worlds.

Because if the two different states (= two parallel worlds of 0 and 1 ) of a *single* qubit (= in the **same** place ) or two different superposition states (= dead and alive in two parallel worlds ) of a single cat can interfere with or influence each other parallel worlds in the **same** place, the resultant "**mixed**" qubit **always** takes only **one** single mixed **average** value =*0.5* (= instead of 0 or 1 ) from the beginning, and only **one** *half-dead* cat (= instead of alive or dead ) exists in the **same** place.

So in as-yet-unrealized quantum computers, each quantum bit or qubit has to exist in two different parallel worlds **independently** of the other parallel world (= one of parallel worlds is "0" bit state, and another parallel world is "1" bit state, instead of a single "mixed 0.5" value invalidating independent parallel-world calculations ).

And these two parallel worlds in the same qubit or place must **Not** change or interfere with each other's value to keep their original correct bit states (= 0 and 1 must exist in two independent different parallel worlds without mixing or interacting with each other, for independent parallel calculations ).

Even in outrageous quantum mechanical superposition or parallel-world rule, when we try to observe each qubit or cat, the observed qubit is supposed to **choose** only "**one** *single* world" out of multiple parallel worlds, and eventually be observed to be 0 or 1, and a cat must be observed to be dead **or** alive.

↑ So there is **No** evidence that quantum superposition or fantasy parallel worlds exist, because they are *intrinsically* **unobservable**, hence the quantum comptuer's speed-up based on unobservable and intangible superposition or parallel worlds ( this p.5 last ) would **never** happen.

You may often hear overhyped fake slogan "A quantum computer with N qubits can **potentially** calculate as many as 2^{N} states *simultaneously* and faster ! (= each qubit could take 2 states simultaneously, hence the total number of different simultaneous states of N qubits could be 2^{N} ? )"

But even if you could luckily calculate as many as 2^{N} different values simultaneously using (imaginary) quantum parallel-world power, you can observe or measure only One single world or one single calculated value, and all other different calculated values using different parallel worlds miserably **disappear** (= called "quantum superposition collapsing to one state", this 18-19th paragraphs ) ! ← Hence, quantum computers are **useless** anyway.

The 26-29th paragraphs of this site says

"A quantum computer can be in a quantum combination of all of those states, called superposition. This allows it to perform one billion or more copies of a computation at the same time... In a quantum computer, all one billion computations will be running on the **same** hardware (← ? ). This is known as quantum parallelism.."

".. how do we access these billion results? If we measured this quantum state, we would get just one of the results. All of the other 999,999,999 results would **disappear**.."

"To solve this problem, one uses the second effect, quantum interference.. Quantum algorithms combine these two effects. Quantum parallelism is used to perform a large number of computations at the same time (= only in the imagination ), and quantum interference is used to combine their results into something that is both meaningful and can be measured.." ← Dream on !

↑ This too good quantum computer's mechanism is unrealistic and **impossible** due to serious *contradictions* included in this **dream**like calculating process.

First of all, if we use only a small amount of energy or work, which is required for executing only **one** calculation, and can magically calculate **many** different values *simultaneously* using **fantasy** quantum parallel worlds, it clearly **violates** the energy conservation law ( one calculation energy → many calculations in parallel worlds !? ← Impossible )

The quantum computer theorists tend to make a very **unrealistic** and convenient claim that **after** the magical quantum computer can calculate many different values simultaneously using a **single** hardware (= or a qubit ) in fantasy parallel worlds, all those different calcualted values in different quantum parallel worlds suddenly *merge* and **interfere** with each other.

And the re-merged or interfering parallel worlds may leave and choose only desirable combined results automatically eliminating undesirable values by magical destructive or construcitive interference between solid qubits allegedly splitting into parallel worlds. ← Too good to be true.

↑ Again, this is physically **impossible**. You know why ?

If many different quantum parallel worlds can **influence** and interfere with each other in the **same** place or *qubit*, each qubit splitting into different superposition states or different parallel worlds can **Not** calculate different values independently or correctly from the beginning because of "interference".

Fictional quantum computers try to calculate many different values in the **same** hardware (= the same one qubit or place ) using different unseen parallel worlds which are *inseparable* and always **interfering** with each other after all.

As a result, each qubit can**not** carry out each independent calculation of different values taking advantage of different parallel worlds (= superposition states ) from the beginning.

↑ Quantum interference, which is required to conveniently pick up only desirable results, eventually *mixes* and **nullifies** quantum superposition states or different parallel worlds which are said to enable multiple different independent parallel calculations. ← nullify the dreamlike quantum computer's
speed-up mechanism of multiple parallel computing.

So this quantum computer's imaginary interference makes it **impossible** for each single qubit (in the **same** place ) to calculate many different meaningful values using independent different parallel worlds.

Because all calculated values, which should be **different** separable values to take advantage of multiple different parallel-worlds' power, are always **combined** into one **inseparable** wrong mixed value in the "same qubit place" by annoying interference from the beginning.

Hence, quantum computer's speed-up would **never** happen as long as physicists try to perform two **conflicting** things; parallel-world computing and interference in the **same** qubit or place.

So if physicists want to use this annoying "quantum interference", they have to carry out **different** calculations in **different** *places* or different qubits (= hence, this is No longer quantum computer's speed-up ) to prevent each different calculating process from being disturbed or interfered with by other calculating processes instead of greedily attempting to perform different calculations in the same one place or qubit.

This is the reason why the (imaginary) quantum computer's speed up by greedily performing **multiple** different calculations in the **same** qubit is **impossible** and unrealized forever.

Furthermore, physicists try to use *chunky* **solid** atoms, ions or superconducting circuits (= very big "artificial atoms") as quantum bis or qubits which are assigned two conflicting **impossible** task of multiple parallel computing like solid computers and interfering with other ( = destructively vanish or constructively enhanced ) like the classical **wave** traveling through the liquid or air *medium*.

Of course, these robust solid atoms, ions or artificial atoms can **neither** overlap nor interfere with other robust solid atoms, different from classical light wave or sound waves.

↑ Because even when two solid atoms or ion qubits meet, they just **collide** with or **scatter** each other in **random** directions **without** causing dreamlike interference between solid qubits which is physically impossible.

Fictional quantum computers rely on the physically **impossible** mechanism of **solid** qubits or atoms causing magical **destructive** interference (= two solid qubits or atoms magically meet and boths qubits suddenly vanish into another dimension or something forever !? ← impossible ) and constructive interference (= two qubits or atoms magically merge and transform into a new bigger qubits or atoms ? ← never happen ).

As a result, the current quantum computer theory is based on *contradictory* **impossible** speed-up mechanism in addition to fantasy parallel-world calculations, which is why useful quantum computers will **never** become reality.

Quantum computer itself is just fiction, then its logic gate or the quantum computer's programming is **Not** physical one, either.

All the current quantum computer's programming is for creating and manipulating **fictional** quantum superposition states or fantasy parallel-worlds **only** inside quantum computer theorists' heads, using imaginary interference between different parallel worlds, which proved to be **impossible**, as I said above.

Next, we explain how unrealistic and meaningless the current quantum computer's program is.

Physicists try to use two energy levels of various atoms or ions as a quantum bit or qubit where the lowest ground-state energy is supposed to be "0", and the next excited energy is supposed to be "1".

When illuminating such an ion with some laser light, an outer electron of the ion moves between the ground state (= 0 ) and excited state (= 1 ) alternately, which *classical* simple electron's movement is called Rabi oscillation.

When the electron passes and transiently exists at some middle point between the ground (= 0 ) and excited (= 1 ) state, quantum mechanics unrealistically **mis**interprets such an electron at the **mid**point as an electron existing in two different states or orbits simultanelously using quantum superpositon or fantasy parallel worlds ( = an electron at the mid-point = 0 + 1 = two parallel worlds !? this p.25 ). ← nonsense.

So the current physicists try to deliberately **mistake** some **classical** or realistic states (= when an electron *transiently* exists between two stable quantized energy levels ) for illusory quantum superposition of a single electron existing in different states simultaneously using **fanatasy** parallel worlds.

In order to artificially create such an unobservable (fake) superposition state by one of parallel-world manipulating operators called "Hadamard gate", physicists just illuminate an ion qubit with some "classical laser light" and make an outer electron go up to some **middle**-energy point (= intentionally mistaken for fantasy quantum parallel-world superposition ) between the lowest ground-state and the next excited energy states ( this p.7-10 ).

Quantum computer physicists try to express this electron just temporarily and classically existing in some "**middle**-energy state" as a **non**physical superposition where a single electron is allegedly in two different states = the ground (= 0 ) and excited (=1 ) states simultaneously using different parallel worlds with the same probability.

This imaginary quantum superposition or parallel worlds of a qubit is denoted as "Hadamard gate" whose math notation does **Not** represent any real electron's motions.

After a while, when physicists illuminate the same ion with some laser light and the electron goes back to the original lowest ground state energy (= 0 = ground state → middle-state → ground state ), the quantum mechanics unreasonably discribes this electron's **ordinary** classical motion of just going up and back by *classical* laser **light** as the electron's going up into two fantasy parallel worlds and returning to the original single world ground state (= ground state-0 → middle-state = superposition of 0 + 1 in two parallel worlds → ground state-0 ). ← nonsense.

After the electron goes up into the middle energy state (= superposition ? ) by absorbing light (= which classical illumination corresponds to one Hadamard gate ), when the superposition state of an electron in the middle-energy is multiplied by another Hadamard gate, the electron is supposed to return from the quantum superposition or parallel worlds into the original ground state 0 in a single world, according to stupid quantum mechanics.

Applying this nonphysical parallel-world creating operator = Hadamard gates to a qubit twice means canceling transiently created parallel worlds (= or qubits ) and returning the electron to the original same ground state 0 ( or if the start is the excited state 1, it is supposed to return to the same original excited state 1 ).

Just when an outer electron of an ion goes up to some middle point ( between the ground and excited energy states 0 and 1 ) and returns to the lowest ground state illuminated by classical lights, quantum mechanics outrageously decribes it as an unrealistic interaction or magical cancellation between diffrent parallel worlds or superpositon states (= parallel worlds or superposition are denoted as different terms of a qubit ) of a single qubit.

Illuminating the ion once and the outer electron goes up to the middle-energy point where an electron is supposed to exist in **two** different superposition states of the ground 0 and excited states 1 using parallel worlds (= a single electron allegedly exists in two different 0 and 1 states simultaneously in the **same** place or the same qubit, which proves to be impossible, as shown above ).

According to unrealistic quantum mechanics, after illuminating the electron with classical light again, the single electron could transiently split into four different superposition states (= four terms ) in four different parallel worlds followed by destructive and constructive interference between four parallel-world qubits.

An electron in the ground state (= 0 ).

→ 1st illumination with light → an electron splits into 0 + 1 (= two parallel worlds ).

→ 2nd illumination with light → the elctron further splits into 0 + 1 → 0 + 0 + 1 - 1 (= four split parallel worlds !? ) → 0 (= returns to the original ground state by canceling only qubits whose value is "1" by convenient destructive interference between two parallel worlds ? this middle )

↑ Physicists try to use these imaginary logic gates for generating fictional parallel-world (= superpotion ) states for achieving the **impossible** dream of quantum computer's speed up in vain.

Just when an outer electron just goes up from the lowest ground state to the middle-energy states and returns to the original lowest energy state by **classical** laser light, quantum mechanics tries to explain this electron's classical motion by deliebrately using **fantasy** unobservable parallel worlds or superpositon = a dead and alive cat state.

As I said, it is impossible that solid qubits such as ions or big superconducting circuits made of many electrons and nuclei overlap or interfere with other ions or big superconducting circuits ( when two solid ions meet, both ions *magically* **vanish** into another dimension by destructive interference ? ← Impossible except as the nonphysical math symbols which have **nothing** to do with real physical phenomena ! )

Quantum computer struggles to **imitate** the ordinary classical light wave theory where light intensity or energy is the **square** of the light **amplitude**.

It's like the square of electron's wavefunction (= this wavefunction corresponds to probability amplitude ) is the probability density of finding an electron in each place.

But as I said, solid qubits such as ions or big artificial atoms can**not** overlap or interfere with other solid ions or atoms (= atom + atom = bigger atom is impossible ). So quantum computer's theorists' reckless attempt to link parallel world calculations of solid qubits to actual classical light wave or de Broglie wave (= or electron's wavefunction ) interference is impossible and **wrong**.

Destructive interference of solid qubits = two ions or atoms splitting into different parallel worlds (= or superposition ) collide with each other and both magically cancel each other and vanish forever into some other parallel world !? ← Impossible.

Constructive interference of solid qubits = two ions or atoms in different parallel worlds meet and merge with each other into another bigger ions or atoms ? ← Impossible, too ( Two ions or solid atoms can**not** merge with or eliminate each other ! )

Furthermore, the concept of the probability or amplitude of quantum superposition or parallel-world states of a quantum computer's bit or qubit is **inconsistent** with not only realistic classical wave but also the original quantum mechanical probabilities expressed as the square of electron's wavefunction.

Real classical wave or quantum wavefunction (= actually, de Broglie wave ) can only overlap or interfere with each other (= only **adding** up two waves or wave's amplitudes is possible ).

↑ Constructive interference = the **sum** of two waves.

Destructive interference = **subtracting** one wave from the other wave.

But quantum computers try to do **impossible** things = multiply one qubit's amplitude (= fictitious superposition of two amplitude states inside one qubit wave ) by another qubit's amplitude (= qubit-1 amplitude wave × qubit-2 amplitude wave × qubit-3 amplitude wave .. = the total qubits' amplitude wave ? ). ← This is **Not** a real object.

↑ This new strange pseudo-wave amplitude concept used in fictional quantum computer's qubits is **neither** real classical wave **nor** the original quantum mechanical electron's wave function ( this p.4 ).

Because the real wave's amplitude can be only **added** or **subtracted** from another wave's amplitude by the ordinary constructive or destructive interference process.

Such a real wave's amplitude can **Not** be multiplied by another wave's amplitude into new total pseudo-wave amplitude like **fictional** multi-qubit's superposition-wave amplitude !

Unlike the amplitude which can be negative, positive or imaginary, the probabilities can be naturally multiplied by other probabilities (= probablity-1 × probability-2 × .. = total probability ), because the sign of probabilities (= square of amplitude ) is always positive (= **never** negative or imaginary numbers ).

The wave amplitude, which can be positive and negative values, can potentially destructively and constructively interfere with other wave amplitudes when adding up two wave amplitudes.

I show a typical example which proves this quantum computer's amplitude is self-contradictory and unrealistic, hence, realizing quantum computer is impossible forever, too.

For example, in this figure's lower part, four qubits are supposed to split into two different superposed parallel worlds (= expressed as the sum of two terms or two qubits' patterns ) where the first parallel world (= the 1st term ) includes 1101 four-qubit binary string, and the second parallel world (= the 2nd term ) includes 1100 four-qubit binary string.

By illuminating the 4th qubit of the second parallel world (= 2nd term ) by some special light, the 4th qubit state is supposed to change from 0 into -1 (= added by "negative" phase ) while other three 1st-3rd qubits remain the same "positive".

In normal wave or wavefunction, when the 1st qubits in both parallel worlds (= both terms ) remain the **positive** phase (= amplitude, here +1 ), the 1st qubit's two superposition states coexisting in two parallel worlds do Not cancel each other by interference ( between parallel worlds ).

But according to the contradictory quantum computer's rule, these positive (= positive qubit wave amplitude ) +1 values of the 1st qubit's two superposition states must cancel each other, even when the irrelevant 4th qubit state (= or amplitude ), which is far away from the 1st qubit position, becomes negative like 1101 + 1100 → 1101 + 110(-1) = only 4th qubit phase changes into negative, but → 1101 - 1101 = 0 (= all four qubits **cancel** each other and vanish ) !? ← Impossible ( this p.21 ).

↑ This physically impossible logic is what quantum computer's fictional qubit's amplitute is.

So the quantum computer qubit's fishy probability amplitude, which can be unrealistically "multiplied" by other qubits' amplitudes and cancel each other, is **neither** real wave nor the original quantum mechanical wave function.

Real wave (amplitude) can only be added or subtracted (as seen in ordinary interference ), **Not** multiplied by other waves.

In the actual quantum computer's (= still Not computer, though ) manipulation, all physicists can do is just **illuminate** ion's qubit or superconducting qubit by classical laser light to change their electron's energy states or qubits' states ( this p.5-11 ) between two standard energy states = ground state 0 and the next excited state 1.

↑ This qubit's manipulation by just illuminating atoms with classical laser lights has **nothing** to do with quantum superpositon, a dead-alive cat or fantasy parallel worlds.

Physicists just meaninglessly "**imagine**" such **unobservable** unreal quantum superposition or parallel-world states after just illuminating atoms by classical laser light.

The impotant point is we can **Not** directly observe the quantum parallel-world superposition of alleged multiple qubit's dead-and-alive-cat states (= expressed as the sum of different qubits' binary states ) or the negative sign of the qubit's pseudo-wave amplitude.

Only the **positive** probabilty values = the square of amplitude can be measured by repeatedly detecting resultant qubits' states in the single world.

So the current physicists try to take advantage of these **unseen** (fantasy) quantum parallel worlds and the **invisibility** of these fictitious negative or imaginary-number qubit *pseudo*-wave amplitudes to design imaginary quantum computer's programs, which is a kind of "art" rather than real science.

They could seemingly give any results (= useless calculations, though ) as they like, by **artificially** *adjusting* the unobservable imaginary-number or negative qubit's pseudo-amplitudes.

↑ The experimental results or qubits' state are observed as one real value at a time in this single world with some "probabilities.

**No** qubit's amplitudes are observed, hence, such an artificially manipulable qubit's pseudo-amplitude concept tends to be exploited as a convenient tool for quantum computer theorists to develop their fictional **useless** quantum computer's theories.

Almost all news about dubious quantum computers is full of **mis**information and intentions to deliberately **hide** the fact that quantum computers acually cannot do any meaningful calculations. instead, they are always *exaggerating* fishy rosy future and imaginary potential of quantum computers.

For example, each qubit of quantum computers is said to be in two different states 0 and 1 simultaneously ? → then, 20 qubits could potentially take 2^{20} suerposition states and calculate 2^{20} different values using (fictional) 2^{20} parallel worlds simultaneously ? ← This is **mis**information, and I proved this dreamlike parallel computing would never happen in the above section.

When we try to observe the qubits' state, each qubit is suddenly supposed to choose and change into only one single world or **one** single calculated result, while all other parallel-world calcuated results miserably **vanish** ! ← Accurately, unseen quantum mechanical superpositon or fantasy parallel worlds did Not occur from the beginning.

To "utilize" the multiple parallel-world calculated values, all parallel worlds must interact and interfere with each other to magically give some desirable result by constructive and destructive interference (= only unnecessary results must be cancelled out, conveniently. )

But if all quantum parallel worlds can interfere with each other (= which is like ordinary classical waves always interact with each other in a **single** world or medium, hence, preparing quantum superposition or different parallel worlds becomes **meaningless** ), multiple independent calculations of different values using different parallel worlds inside the same qubit are impossible from the beginning.

Because all parallel-world values are miserably **mixed** and merged into one single meaningless value from the beginning, hence physicists can calculate only one single meaningless value, if quantum parallel worlds can interfere with each other from the beginning. ← Quantum computer proves to be **useless** with No speed-up forever.

Multiple parallel worlds or quantum superposition states interfere with each other ? = It's just like ordinary overlapped and interfering waves in a **single** world or a single medium. = Quantum computer parallel-world computing is meaningless and invalid, hence, its quantum speed-up is **impossible**.

If the quantum computer really carried out parallel computing using magical quantum superposition or fantasy parallel worlds as the fake news media repeatedly **exaggerates**, it could have already factorizing large numbers by the so-called Shor's algorithm (= a method of factorizing a number by the way of parallel calculations of different values ) faster than the ordinary classical computer.

But so far, quantum computers (= still Not computers ) can factorize only meaninglessly **small** numbers such as 21 = 3 × 7 or 15 = 3 × 5 ( this 6th paragraph ).

Furthermore, this Shor's algorithm allegedly implemented in quantum computer research so far is all **fake**, which was Not the original Shor's algorithm using potentially faster parallel computing.

Hence, there is **No** experimental evidence of quantum superposition, quantum speed-up by parallel (world) computing.

The current quantum computer can only factor very **small** meaningless numbers such as 15 or 21 by calculating **one** single value at a time using only a **single** world ( they can only calculate one small number at a time → reset, reinitialize and recycle the used qubits to calculate another single value at a time **instead of** calculating multiple values simultaneously using quantum superpositon or fantasy parallel worlds, this p.2 left 2nd-last paragraph, or Fig.1 B-D ).

So after all, it was proved that quantum computers have **No** ability or No potential to perform any multiple parallel calculations faster utilizing quantum superpositon or (powerful ?) parallel worlds which "fictional potentials of quantum computers" are just repeatedly overblown by an incredible number of **fake** news flooding the current media.

Don't be misled by them.

Quantum computers will **never** become reality.

See this week physics is still useless.

*(Q-1) ↓ A mere classical world mistaken for * *?*

In fact, the current *mainstream* atomic theory called quantum mechanics is a mere crazy pseudo-science imposing only unrealistic **impossible** worlds on us.

Quantum mechanics brazenly insists each particle can exist in **multiple** states and places *simultaneously* using **fantasy** parallel worlds, like a single cat can be dead and alive at once, which is called "superposition".

Now physicists across the world are **recklessly** trying to make dreamlike (illusory) faster quantum computers by harnessing this **fictional** quantum mechanical parallel-world superposition for the as-yet-unseen parallel calculation of **multiple** values simultaneously using a *single* quantum computer bit or qubit.

↑ This is **impossible**, because this ridiculous quantum computer logic **violates** basic physical principles.

For example, physicists use some amount of **energy** required for only **one** calculation. → But according to the ridiculous quantum mechanics, this small energy for only **one** calculation can implement **many** different calculations using different parallel worlds simultaneously ? ← Fantasy quantum computers **violates** the energy conservation law.

Of course, quantum mechanical parallel worlds are just **fiction**. This is why quantum computers are still useless ( forever ), they are Not even computers or calculators despite an incredibly amount of time and money wasted for such a **fictional** pseudo-science, except in hyped **fake** news about the *imaginary* future which would **never** become reality.

Different from the ordinary classical computer bit, each quantum computer bit called a **qubit** is said to be in two different states 0 and 1 simultaneously like a single *ghost* cat (= qubit ? ) can be dead (= 0 ) and alive (= 1 ) simultaneously splitting into unseen **fantasy** multiple parallel worlds.

But thinking commonsensically, it is **impossible** for each **real** particle or cat to exist in two different states like dead and alive simultaneously.

Why do physicists, prestigious academia, and (in)famous quantum mechanics, which old theory has survived (= oppressed oppositions ) for 100 years, believe in such a **ridiculous** *impossible* principle or fantasy ? Where did they **mistake** ?

Two atomic ( or ion's ) energy levels are often exploited as a quantum bit or qubit where an atomic (or ion's ) outer electron existing in the lowest ground-state energy is supposed to be "0" bit, and electron existing in the next excited energy level is supposed to be in "1" bit state.

When each atom or a trapped ion is illuminated by some laser light (= called a "photon" for formality's sake ), the electron **moves** *between* the ground state (= 0 ) and the excited state (= 1 ).

Of course, an electron can**not** move instantly or at an infinite speed (= an electron cannot move faster-than-light ) between two different energy levels or orbits. An electron must **pass** some "**middle**-energy state or *mid*-point" between the ground (= 0 ) and the excited (= 1 ) states at some point.

The problem is the old quantum mechanics has **No** ways of expressing such a **middle**-energy state or *mid-point* between two stable **standard** quantized energy states or orbits (= stable ground and excited states ), hence, quantum mechanics has to rely on **illusory** *parallel worlds* or superposition (= an unreal dead and alive cat state ) to describe some "*unstable* **middle** orbital state" between the major ground and excited states.

The only way for the unphysical quantum mechanics to obtain atomic energy states ( levels ) or electron's orbits is solving ancient Schrödinger's equation which only gives atomic states as nonphysical wavefunctions of quantized energy levels or orbitals (= n = 1, 2, 3, .. ) **without** showing any detailed electron's motions inside mathematical wavefunctions.

Those quantum wavefunctions obtained by solving ancient Schrödinger equations do **Not** include the **middle** states such as n = 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 *mid-orbitals* where an electron has to pass when it moves between standard quantized energy levels ( n = 1, 2, 3 .. )

So when physicists want to describe the "**middle** state" where an electron **passes** the middle point (= n = 1.5 mid-orbital ) between the ground (= n = 1 orbital ) and excited (= n = 2 orbital ) states, the only way to express the middle-energy state is the superpositon (= *parallel worlds* ) of two different standard quantized energy states (= 1.5 = (1 + 2)/2 ).

↑ So according to the **authoritarian** quantum mechanical rule, all **middle**-energy states or orbitals, which can**not** be expressed as *solutions* of ancient Schrödinger equation, must be treated as "**unreal** ghost *middle states*" described only as **fantasy** quantum parallel worlds or the dead-alive cat superposition of other orbits. ← nonsense.

The problem is we can **Not** get exact solutions of Schrödinger equations for any multi-electron atoms except for an one-electron hydrogen atom.

Hence the quantum mechanical basic principle treating middle-energy states, which are not originally solutions of Schrödinger equations, as illusory parallel-world states or superposition of other orbits is **illogical** and contradictory, because whether middle-states or major states, there are No solutions of Schrödinger equations in any multi-electron atoms or ions.

Such contradictory larger atoms or ions are used for the current (illusory) ion quantum computers (= still Not computers ) in vain.

A hydrogen atom, which is the only atom with the exact solution of Schrödinger equation, can Not be used as a quantum computer's bit or qubit, which fact is enough to explain why the current quantum computers and their parallel worlds are **meaningless** and illusion.

Though quantum mechanics **falsely** claims each electron can be in two different energy states or orbits simultaneously using fantasy parallel worlds or superposition, it's **impossible** to see or confirm such **fantasy** quantum parallel worlds or superposition directly.

Quantum mechanics repeatedly promoting unseen parallel worlds makes a *poor* **excuse** that when we try to observe such strange quantum parallel-world superposition, it suddenly changes to a single real world where each particle, qubit or cat is eventually observed to be in only one state 0 or 1 ( a cat is observed to be dead **or** alive )
at once.

So there is **No** experimental evidence of fantasy quantum mechanical parallel worlds or superposition, hence the quantum computer fishy speed-up based on such an **illusory** parallel-world calculation is **baseless** and illusion.

It is very difficult to artificially create such a fake quantum parallel-world superposition state by placing an electron in an unstable **middle**-energy orbit between the stable ground-state and excited states, which is why even scaling up ( imaginary stable ) quantum computers is still **impractical** ( forever ).

For example, in an one-electron hydrogen atom, different atomic energy levels or electron's stable quantized orbits are characterized by electron's orbits of different integer times de Broglie wavelengths avoiding destructive interference caused by a **fractional** de Broglie wavelength orbit whose fractional orbit corresponds to the **middle**-energy-state orbit of a hydrogen atom.

This electron's de Broglie wave and its interference were confirmed in many experiments, and the experimentally-confirmed concept of de Broglie wavelength also **underlies** the wavefunctions of the current quantum mechanics based on Schrödinger equation.

**Unrealistic** quantum mechanics continues to take a **contradictory** attitude of refusing to accept the electron's de Broglie wave or light wave as real waves, though its interference was **actually** *observed* in many experiments.

Quantum mechanics, which **gave up** clarifying what a real particle or wave is, does **Not** know the effective way of controlling the electron's de Broglie wave or placing an electron in middle-state orbits of a fractional de Broglie wavelength (= n = 1.5, 2.5 .. ), which is why the one-electron hydrogen atomic energy levels or orbits cannot be utilized for creating (fake) quantum superposition (= middle fractional de Broglie wavelength state ) of other quantized orbits in quantum computer's bits or qubits.

Physicists desperately tried to find **special** atoms or ions possessing "**metastable** *middle*-energy states" which can be used as (fake) quantum superposition of two major stable energy states, whose superposition middle-state **appears** to utilize fantasy quantum mechanical parallel worlds.

Calcium ion (= Ca+ ) is said to have such a *metastable* **middle**-energy state between the lowest-energy ground-state S1/2 (= 0 ) and one excited state D5/2 (= 1 ), which **metastable** middle state can allegedly last for about 1 second.

By illuminating a single Ca+ ion trapped in artificially-manipulable electromagnetic field by laser light, an outer electron of the Ca+ ion moves in the **middle** area between the ground (= denoted as S or 0 ) and excited (= denoted as D or 1 ) energy levels back and forth, which *classical* electron's movement is called "Rabi oscillation."

Quantum mechanics **outrageously** treats this classical Rabi oscillation where the ion's outer electron just moves in the metastable **middle** state between two main stable energy levels 0 and 1 alternately (= **Not** simultaneously ) as **fictional** quantum parallel-world superpoition or coherent state ( this p.25 ).

Even according to ridiculous quantum mechanical rule, we can**not** observe an electron existing in two different states 0 and 1 of two parallel worlds simultaneously.

All physicists can detect is the "oscillating probability" of just **one** single state where an electron can take **only** one state of the ground-state (= 0 ) **or** the excited-state (= 1 = D5/2 in Ca+ ion ) simultaneously.

Why can trapped ions such as calcium ions be used for qubits allegedly possessing *pseudo*-quantum superposition or the metastable middle-energy state between major 0 and 1 energy states, while ordinary hydrogen atoms cannot be used for qubits ?

Different from an one-electron hydrogen atom with a very small number of energy levels split by quantized *de Broglie* wavelength, large atoms or ions such as Ca+ split energy levels into many lines by "**Coulomb** interaction" between an outer electron and other inner electrons.

↑ For example, in an one-electron hydrogen atom, 4s and 4p orbits are in the same energy levels due to the same de Broglie wavelength orbits, but in the calcium ion, 4s and 4p are in different energy levels due to **Coulomb** interaction between an outer and inner electrons which Coulomb interaction among **multiple** electrons does Not exist in one-electron hydrogen atoms.

So by just **artificially** adjusting or *manipulating* **electro**magnetic fields of the ion trap device, they can more easily control and keep the *metastable* **middle**-energy or (fake) superposition state (= caused by Coulomb interaction between inner electrons and an outer electron ) than one-electron hydrogen atom whose energy levels are determined mainly by 'uncertain' de Broglie wavelength, which is harder to control than easily-manipulable Coulomb interaction.

↑ This is the **trick** of seemingly creating **fantasy** quantum mechanical parallel worlds, which is just a **classical** state where an ion's outer electron **transiently** exists in the *metastable* **middle**-energy state between two major stable energy states (= 0 ground-state and 1-stable excited state ) in trapped ions.

Other ions usually use two hyperfine energy states caused by different directions of a nuclear spin (= **magnet** ) as a qubit (= 0 bit is ↓ nuclear spin, 1 bit is ↑ nuclear spin ).

A nucleus, which is much heavier and bigger than a tiny fluctuating electron, can actually have "spin" whose spin magnetic direction can be kept and controlled **stably**, different from the unrealistic electron spin.

Such a massive nuclear spin **magnetic** direction can be easily and stably
controlled by external electro**magnetic** field, hence its transient metastable middle-energy state (= nuclear spin points in the **horizontal** direction between ↑ and ↓ spin directions ) can be easily created as fake quantum superposition or parallel-world state of ↑ and ↓ nuclear spins.

Also in these ion qubits, fantasy quantum mechanical parallel worlds or superposition cannot be observed.

All physicists can detect is uncertain "probabilities" of the nuclear spin (= tiny magnetic field ) pointing upward or downward as classical Rabi oscillation ( this p.3, this p.8 ).

In order to utilize such an unstably-floating ion for the future imaginary quantum computer and its logic gates, ions have to interact with other ions through electromagnetic fields which must be changed and distinguished by a slightly-different electron's orbital states or nuclear magnetic states (= 0 or 1 ) of each ion.

In order to control multiple ion qubits' states interacting with other ions, we have to find some laser light pulses with special frequencies which can distinguish different combinations of multiple ion qubit states caused by such a small energy difference of electromagnetic interactions between ions ( this p.3, this p.1-2 ), which unrealistically-difficult delicate qubit-manipulating method makes (future) quantum computers more unreliable, **fragile** and impractical than the current stable ordinary classical computers.

IBM, Google, D-Wave.. almost all the present big quantum computer companies try to use a mere superconducting circuit consisting of an *old*-fashioned **classical** capacitor and an inductor (+ Josephson junctions ) as a big artificial atom or a single unrealistically-giant bulky qubit.

Such an extremely **bulky** and giant *artificial atom* or qubit (= each qubit is ~ 1 mm big ! this p.2 ) is more than **10000** times **larger** than the current ordinary classical tiny computer bit (= each classical computer bit is only less than 50 nm ).

Because superconducting qubits must use "microwave light" with very **long** wavelength (> 1 mm ) as a means of transmitting information between qubits.

So such an incoveniently-large qubit can **never** outperform or calculate faster than the current widely-used classical computer made of billions of very **compact** and energy-efficient tiny bits.

The same area as a giant superconducting qubit or an artificial atom can contain more than 10000 compact classical computer bits, hence, the current classical computer can calculate more than 10000 times larger numbers of different values *simultaneously* and **faster** than the as-yet-unrealized bulky quantum computer, even if fantasy quantum superposition or parallel-worlds of (only) **two** different states in each giant qubit are real.

Illusory quantum superposition or parallel worlds of each superconducting qubit being in two different states simultaneously (← ? ) is caused by **false** interpretation of **fictitious** particles called quasi-particles. We explain why here.

In this superconducting qubit, the number of **fictitious** quasiparticle called "Cooper pair" included in some region called Cooper pair box of the circuit is supposed to determine each qubit's binary state 0 (= number of Cooper pair is "n" in Cooper pair box ) or 1 (= number of Cooper pair is "n+1" in Cooper pair box ).

So in the superconducting qubit, the so-called quantum superposition or parallel worlds are allegedly expressed by the state of a **fractional** number of Cooper pairs (= ex. 1.5 × Cooper pair = **superposition** of 1 Cooper pair and 2 Cooper pairs !? ) included in Cooper pair box region ( this p.12, this p.2 ).

The problem is each *Cooper pair* is **Not** a real **single** particle but a **fictitious** *composite* **quasi**-particle consisting of **two** electrons which are said to be a long distance apart (~ 100 nm = more than 1000 atomic length ) from each other, and loosely bound by other **fake** particles called "virtual phonon quasiparticles."

Of course, it is impossible for two negatively-charged electrons (= electrons normally **repel** other negative electrons ) to attract each other to form a fictitious Cooper pair.

Quantum mechanics just *vaguely* says two electrons "**appear**" to attract (= Not really attract ) each other through some fishy "atomic (= positve nuclei ) vibration", which means two electrons just "appear" to attract each other by many positive **nuclei** between two electrons.

So the quantum mechanical formal explanation of a (fictitious) Cooper pair formed by two electrons "attracting" each other is **false** and against the reality.

Quantum mechanics obstinately **refuses** to clarify the true mechanism of this "vague atomic or nuclear vibration" which allegedly binds two repulsive electrons for seemingly forming a fictitious Cooper pair, instead, it artificially fabricated **fictitious** *quasiparticles* called "virtual phonons" as **imaginary** *mediators* binding two electrons.

Superconducting quantum computers made up the *artificial* **baseless** rule
that two electrons forming a Cooper pair are hard to separate at an extremely low temperature (= two electrons actually **repel** each other, though ).

Hence a **fractional** number (= n + 0.5 ) of *Cooper pair* can**not** exist except as a (fictional) **superposition** state combining two different **integral** numbers (= n and n+1 ) of Cooper pairs living in parallel worlds.

But each Cooper pair is composed of two electrons, so a fractional Cooper pair (= dividing one Cooper pair into two electrons ) is possible without relying on fantasy quantum superposition or parallel worlds.

A **fractional** number of **fictitious** *Cooper pairs* is equal to "an **odd** number of electrons" (= each Cooper pair consists of two electrons, hence, **1.5** Cooper pairs just consist of **3** electrons, which is realistic and has **nothing** to do with fantasy quantum superposition state combining 1 and 2 Cooper pairs simultaneously using parallel worlds. )

The original paper of the superconducting qubits ( this p.1 right ) says

"The (electromagnetic) pulse brings the two **charge** states into
resonance and lets the wavefunction *coherently* evolve between |0› (= **0** electrons or **zero** Cooper pair )
and |2› (= **2** electrons or **one** Cooper pair ) during the pulse length.. The quantum state at the end of
the pulse would be a **superposition** (= quantum parallel world !? ) of the **two** charge states (= |0› ↔ |2› )", which is just equal to "**one** *classical* electron", Not a fantasy quantum superposition.

".. The probe junction was voltage-biased with an appropriate
voltage Vb so that |2› decays to |0› with two sequential **quasiparticle**.."

So in all superconducting qubits or quantum computers (= still Not comptuers, though ), the **illusion** that each qubit can be in two different states (= 0 and 1 Cooper pair states, this 2nd paragraph ) simultaneously using quantum superposition or parallel worlds is caused by "**fictitious** *quasiparticles*" containing an **odd** number of *classical* **electrons** (= ex. three classical electrons are mistaken for 1.5 Cooper pair or a superposition of 1 and 2 Cooper pair states in parallel worlds ).

Actually, it is impossible to detect or distinguish such a tiny number of charges between 0 Cooper pair (= 0 electrons ) and 1 Cooper pair (= 2 electrons ) states surrounded by an incredible number of other irrelevant electrons for reading out each superconducting qubit state (= detecting a single Cooper pair or two electrons ).

Physicists had to **repeatedly** measure the same charge qubit state **many** times, and from the accumulated charges they just roughly estimated the *average* number of Cooper pair (= or two electrons ) for distinguishing charge qubit state, which repeated tasks for reading out one single qubit takes an incredible amount of time, hence *impractical* ( this p.5 ).

The current most widely-used transmon qubit (= one of superconducting qubits which also allegedly uses the Cooper pair number as a qubit state 0 and 1 ) just tries to detect the slight "**light** frequency change" of **microwave** pulse modified by a qubit's charge state instead of directly measuring the number of a pair of two electrons or Cooper pairs ( this 22th paragraph measurement, this p.10-11 ).

So it is **unclear** whether this most popular fishy transmon superconducting qubit state detected by the slight change of microwave interacting with each qubit really means the quantized Cooper pair numbers. ← The use of quantum superposition or parallel worlds in all the superconducting qubits is **baseless**.

Anyway, the current quantum computers try to use very unstable states with an extremely small difference of only one fictitious Cooper pair or two electrons as quantum bits or qubits, so the lifetime of such a **fragile** quantum bit or computer is extremely short (= less than 1 ms ).

Their so-called quantum computers are easily broken, impractical and **inferior** to the current ordinary classical computers forever.

You might have seen many kinds of *overhyped* quantum technology **fake** news that each quantum bit can take two states (= 0 and 1 ) simultaneously, hence, the quantum computer with N qubits could potentially calculate as many as 2^{N} different states simultaneously using quantum parallel worlds in the future. ← This is a lie and **impossible**.

Because the quantum mechanics says when you try to observe such multiple parallel-world quantum states, it suddenly chooses and changes into only one world or state, hence, you can observe only one qubit or one pattern of binary qubit string after all.

For example, physicists can observe only **one** binary qubit string pattern, say, "001" out of 8 possible patterns (= 000, 001, 010, 100, 110, 101, 011, 111 ) in three qubits at a time. ← So there is No experimental evidence of quantum superposition or parallel-world computing.

In order to exploit (fictional) quantum mechanical parallel-world power, all split parallel worlds, where each parallel world is supposed to calculate different values from other worlds, have to *reunite* and **interact** (= re-mix or **interfere** ) with other parallel-world calculated values at some point to utilize all different calculated values using all different parallel worlds, before observing the single united average value.

Quantum computer is based on a *ridiculous* **impossible** logic, which is why the useful or faster quantum computer can **never** be realized.

Each qubit of the total N qubits **splits** (← ? ) into two superposition states 0 and 1. → They could perform up to 2^{N} different calculations simultaneously (= **No** experimental proof, though ) using 2^{N} different (fantasy) quantum **parallel** worlds.

→ But the *measurement* of the calculated values can just see only **one** of calculated values belonging to one single world (= all other calculated values using different parallel worlds suddenly and miserably **disappear** by the single measurement ).

Hence, parallel calculations allegedly using quantum parallel worlds or superposition is **meaningless**, causing No quantum speed-up, becase physicists can observe or utilize only **One** single world calculated result after all.

Quantum mechanics, which obstinately **refuses** to give up fantasy parallel-world calculations, started to say another ridiculous possibility of potential faster computing, which is actually **impossible** because of its self-**contradiction**.

→ 2^{N} different calculated values using 2^{N} different parallel worlds may "**interact** (or interfere )" with each other to give the average result containing all values before the measurement, which convenient fantasy method potentially makes it possible to utilize all different calculated values using all different parallel worlds before the measurement ( this 26-29th paragraphs ).

All qubits **split** into many **independent** *parallel worlds*. → Each parallel world could calculate different values independently of other worlds. → But after all, all parallel worlds must **merge** into **one** single world (= then, it is impossible for each parallel world to perform different calculation independently, from the beginning ! ) ← This quantum computer logic is self-contradictory, hence would **never** happen.

↑ If all different **parallel** worlds can **interfere** with each other, they can**not** calculate different values independently using different parallel worlds simultaneously, because they can**not** distinguish different parallel-world states or values which are interfering with each other, and **mixed** into one indistinguishable single value or world from the beginning.

Furthermore, physicists use an atom (or ion ) or a big artificial atom consisting of many **solid** atoms as a qubit which can**not** interfere or overlap with each other, different from classical wave naturally interfering with each other, even if quantum parallel world is real.

A solid atom or ion can**not** *overlap* other solid atoms or ions, hence such atomic or ionic qubits can **neither** destructively **interfere** (= two overlapped solid atoms = vanish !? ← never happen ) nor constructively interfere with other atomic solid qubits (= two overlapped solid atoms or qubits get together to form one bigger new solid atom or qubit !? ← impossible ).

↑ Utilizing quantum superposition or parallel worlds for dreamlike faster parallel (= simultaneous ) calculations and interference between all parallel worlds for getting the desired average resultant value combining all parallel-world calculated values is physically **impossible**. ← The current quantum computer physicists across the world are recklessly aiming at this **unrealistic** dream.

So the current quantum computer science tries to do physically-**impossible** and *contradictory* things from the beginning. Creating superposition is illusion. All countries are wasting a lot of money and time in such an illusory impossible computer in vain.

Quantum computer originally aimed to factor a large number by calculating many different values simultaneously potentially using fantasy different parallel worlds according to "Shor's algorithm" ( this 6th-last to 3rd-last paragraphs ), which dreamlike factoring by Shor's algorithm is still **impossible** ( this 18th paragraph ).

Because the current quantum computers can only calculate one very small meaningless number at a time, reset (= delete the calculated value ) and recycle qubits (= called "semi-**classical** factoring by **fake** Shor's algorithm" this p.3 middle 2nd paragraph ) **instead** of calculating multiple values simultaneously (= which was the original as-yet-unrealized Shor's algorithm of potentially faster factoring ) using quantum superposition or parallel worlds.

So there is **No** experimental evidence of quantum superposition, parallel-world computing or quantum computer speed-up.

**Three** quantum bits or qubits are supposed to be in eight different states (= each qubit could be in two states 0 and 1 simultaneously, hence the total different qubit-state patterns is 2^{3} = 8 patterns ), which 8 pattern superposition states using 3 qubits are still **unrealized** and **illusion**, unfortunately.

According to actual quantum mechanical researches, these 3 qubits can be only in two or three different states *alternately* (= **Not** simultaneously ) instead of 3 qubits taking 8 different states simultaneoulsy using quantum superpositon or parallel worlds. ← So all the exaggerated news claiming quantum computer bits can take many different states simultaneously is just **fake** and **baseless**.

According to the actual experiments so far, these three qubits can take only **three** different states (= 100 or 010 or 001 ) **alternately** (= Not simultaneously ), which is called W state instead of three qubits taking eight different states simultaneously by quantum superposition.

Or three qubits can be in only **two** different states (= 000 or 111 ) alternately,which is called GHZ states, instead of realizing dreamlike eight different quantum superposition states (= 000, 001, 010, 100, 011, 101. 110, 111 ).

Even more than three qubits can take only **two** or three qubit states alternately ( this p.1 right 2nd paragraph, this p.3 ) instead of taking many possible different quantum superposition states simultaneously. ← Quantum computer speed-up by fantasy parallel-world computing proves to be a big **lie** and fake news.

So the flashy hyped catchphrase such as "3 ( or 20 ) qubits can potentially be 2^{3} = 8 states ( or 2^{20} = 1048576 states ) simultaneously in dreamlike future quantum computers !" is untrue and **baseless** with No experimental evidence.

Even 20 qubits (= the current maximum number of qubits ) can take only **two** states alternately (= GHZ state where 20 qubits just oscillate between 000000.. ↔ 111111.. in this ) instead of achieving the high-sounding quantum mechanical original idea that 20 qubits can be in as many as 2^{20} = 1048576 different states simultaneously (= just a **lie** ).

The third false claim of creating (illusory) parallel worlds is the "**photon** quantum computer" which just consists of **old**-fashioned classical beam splitters and photodetectors, and uses **classical** *light* polarizations as a seeming quantum bit or qubit (ex. horizontally-polarized light or photon is supposed to be 0 bit state, vertically-polarized light or photon is supposed to be 1 bit state ).

When these two classical light waves with different polarizations just overlap each other, quantum mechanics unrealistically calls such a "**classically**-*overlapped* light state" a "photon existing in two different states" (= horizontal and vertical polarizations) simultaneously using **fictional** quantum superposition or parallel worlds. ← nonsense.

Classical light wave tends to be **falsely** treated as a *photon* **particle** just by detecting the classical light **wave** in a photodetector which just detects electrons excited by classical light instead of an illusory photon particle.

Even when very weak classical light (= called a photon for formality's sake ) *realistically* **splits** at a beam splitter or two slits, quantum mechanics **unrealistically** insists a (fictitious) *photon particle* **splits** into **two** different paths using illusory quantum superposition or parallel worlds and **interferes** with each other.

↑ First of all, even if **fantasy** superposition or quantum parallel worlds were real, a photon particle (= a rigid **ball** ! ) can**not** interfere with other photons destructively (= two photon balls vanish !? ← impossible ) or interfere constructively (= two photon **balls** *magically* **merge** into one bigger new photon ball !? ← ridiculous )

When two photon particles (= photon rigid **balls** ) meet each other at beam splitters or something, they just **scatter** each other in **random** directions like colliding rigid balls **without** interfering.

Interference is the phenomenon caused **only** by *classical* (**light**) wave traveling through some medium.

The 7th paragraph of this news on the recent Chinese quantum computer supremacy (= speed-up ? actually **Not** ) research using fictitious photons says,

"Photons are first sent into a network of channels. There, each photon encounters a series of *beam splitters*, each of which sends the photon down two paths **simultaneously**, in what’s called a quantum *superposition* (= parallel worlds ? ). Paths also merge together, and the repeated splitting and merging causes the photons to **interfere** with one another according to **quantum** rules (← this is **false**, because a quantum *photon* **particle** can **Not** interfere, only *classical* light wave can interfere )."

The 4th paragraph of this news on the same Chinese photon quantum computer supremacy experiment says,

"Simulating the **classical** system (with the real **balls** ← this is **false** again, because the "*classical light*" is "**wave**", Not a ball ) is relatively easy with a classical computer. However, the bar is higher when we deal with **quantum** objects. This is due to the **interference** (← this is wrong again, because a quantum photon **particle** cannot interfere, only classical light wave can interfere ) between various possible paths and to the boson interaction described above."

↑ They **falsely** *exchanged* "classical light **wave**" and a "quantum photon **particle**" → "fictitious classical light **ball**" and "fictitious quantum light **wave**" ← there are No such things as classical photon particles !

Originally only *classical* light **wave** can **interfere**, and a quantum photon **particle** can**not** interfere.

So this kind of fishy quantum computer speed-up or supremacy is **illusion** caused by the **false** comparisons between a fictitious quantum photon **with** interference ability and a **fictitious** classical photon particle (= not classical wave ) magically **losing** interference ability.

What kind of dubious "quantum interference" did physicists use in these photon quantum computer (= Not computers or calculators at all ) researches ?

The 5th paragraph of this news says strange things **without** showing any detailed physical mechanisms.

"if two identical photons are incident on the same beam splitter from two different ports, then the result is not entirely random. They will both exit the **same** port, though which port they exit is random."

↑ This strange phenomenon of two photons **appearing** to stick together (= of course, photon or light can **Not** stick together ) is called "Hong–Ou–Mandel effect" which is the **basis** of recent Chinese photon quantum supremacy experiment ( this p.4 last ).

As you know, classical light or photons can**not** stick to other light or photons, instead, lights (or photons ) just overlap, pass or **interfere** with each other.

Then why identical photons or light always exit the same side of a beam splitter as if two lights or photons **stick** together ?

**Classical** light wave is known to change its phase by 180^{o} when they reflect from the surface of a *medium* with highr refractive index.

When the light hits a beam splitter from the upper side, and reflects from the upper surface of a glass (= higher refractive index ) of a beam splitter, it changes its phase by 180^{o}, and when the light reflects from the lower side (= just after passing the upper side ) of the beam splitter, it does not change its phase, which is the **classical** wave theory.

So two lights entering the same half beam splitter from different sides can reflect from the beam splitter changing or not changing their phase depending on which surface of the beam splitter reflects each light.

And the total light **intensity** or energy before and after passing or reflecting from the beam splitter must be conserved.

Each light splits into two sides of the beam splitter (= the half split light passes and the half split light reflects from the beam splitter in different directions ) and interfere with the other light at the both exits.

When two lights exiting one side interfere **constructively** (= resultant light intensity is the square of the sum of two light amplitudes ), lights exiting the other side must interfere **destructively** (= one of the half split lights reflects from the beam splitter changing its phase by 180^{o}, this p.6, this p.9 ).

Due to the total light intensity or energy **conservation** and constructive (or destructive ) interference, it is **impossible** that lights exiting both sides interfere constructively (= the exiting light energy unrealistically becomes twice the original energy of the incident light ! ) or destructively (= the incident light energy unrealistically disappears ! = Total energy is Not conserved ).

If the light is a photon **particle** (of quantum mechanics ), the photon **particle** can **Not** split or interfere with the other photon particle constructively or destructively from the beginning ( this p.16 ).

If the quantum mechanical photon particle (= a rigid **ball** ) was real, the observed light (= photon particle balls ) would easily scatter other light (= a photon **particle** ball ) without overlapping or interfering with other lights (= photon particle balls ).

So the quantum photon particles **contradicting** actual physical phenomena such as destructive and constructive interference do **Not** exist.

Only *classical* light **wave** interfering with other light waves exists in this real world (= there are No such things as "classical photon particles losing interfering ability", though ).

In conclusion, photon quantum computer supremacy or advantage is just **illusion** caused by *deliberately* **mistaking** classical light wave for **fishy** "artificially-made quantum interference" or something.

In the original Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment where two *photons* (= just **classical** *light waves* ) "appear" to stick together (= impossible ! ) and exit the same side of the beam splitter by destructive and constructive interference of *classical* **light** wave theory, they used two mutually incoherent (= two light phases were random, this p.6 right upper ).

At a beam splitter, only one reflected incident light changes its original phase by 180^{o}, and the other reflected light does Not change its original phase due to different refractive index materials of beam splitter (= phases of both transmitted lights are unchanged ).

So, the light exiting only one side of beam splitter always (partially) experiences destructive interferece between the reflected and transmitted lights ( whose light intensity cannot reach the detection threshold of the photodetector, hence cannot be detected as a "photon" ), and the other light exiting the other side of beam splitter always experiences constructive interference (= detected as a photon ). Which side detects a photon (= constructively interfered and enhanced classical light wave ) varies depending on the randomly-changing incident light phases.

As seen here, **fictional** quantum superposition or parallel worlds, which unreasonably become the basis of illusory quantum computer speed-up by parallel-world calculations, are caused by **unphysical** quantum mechanics stubbornly refusing to accept real electron particles and real waves such as classical light wave and de Broglie wave, instead, it relies on **fictitious** quasiparticles, Cooper pairs, fake artificial atoms or photons.

This quantum mechanical "harmful **un**scientific attitude" sticking to **unreal** quasiparticles (like recently retracted Microsoft's **illusory** Majorana fermion ) **giving up** pursuing true mechanism based on real particles is the main reason why there will be **No** technological innovation in the current mere **political**-tool science = climate change, and replacing *uncertain* vaccines by new effective treatments is still a pipe dream.

See this week physics is still useless.

See previous version of criticizing top journals.

2021/4/30 updated. Feel free to link to this site.