Home page Contents
Twin paradox disproves Einstein
Sagnac effect disproves Einstein
Stellar aberration proves ether
paradox
, Rindler, GPS contradict relativity.
(Fig.M) Einstein relativity rejecting the light medium causes many irreparable paradoxes due to its unphysical Lorentz transformation.
Einstein relativity paradoxically says there is No absolute frame nor light medium (= aether ) filling space, which means whether things are moving or not is uncertain and changed as seen by differently-moving observers.
↑ This unrealistic Einstein relativity lacking the real light medium cannot explain interference, diffraction and refraction of light wave, electron's de Broglie wave in two-slit interference, and Maxwell electromagnetic theory involving the medium.
This unrealistic Einstein relativity with Lorentz transformation was derived by wrongly interpreting Michelson-Morley experiments that showed light was measured to always travel at the constant light speed c on the earth rotating around Sun, which fact disproved the absolute aether or lumniferous medium that is independent of the earth rotating around Sun ( this-p.1-last ).
↑ But this Michelson-Morley experiment did Not deny the light medium moving with the earth. ← Inside that earth medium the light can be measured to always travel at the constant light speed c in any directions like the constant sound speed in the air medium.
↑ This realistic light medium moving with the earth can perfectly explain stellar aberration, interference, refraction of light and electron's de Broglie wave without paradoxes such as kinetic energy and electron's de Broglie wave.
Einstein relativity claiming light is measured to always travel at the constant light speed c independent of observers and light sources ( this-p.3-p.6 ) is false.
Signals emitted from GPS satellite are observed to travel faster (= c + v ) or slower (= c - v ) than light speed c by observers on the earth spinning speed of v in Sagnac effect disproving Einstein relativity ( this-3. conclusion ).
↑ Only the medium moving with the earth (= which can explain Michenson-Morley experiments ) but that medium independent of the earth spinning (= which can explain faster-than-light Sagnac effect ) agrees with all the experiments.
Einstein relativity unrealistically claims the moving clocks tick slower than the stationary clocks.
Einstein relativity lacks the absolute frame, so which clocks are moving and ticking slower is paradoxical and changed as seen by different observers, which is called twin paradox.
Contrary to textbooks, this twin paradox is real, disproving Einstein relativity.
When the clock-S is moving and rotating in a circular path with respect to the stationary clock-C, the clock-C (or clock-S ) sees the other clock-S (or clock-C ) moving and ticking slower.
↑ Which clock S or C is moving (= rotating ) and ticking slower is paradoxical (= clock-S can return to the original clock-C position and compare their paradoxical clock times ).
Michelson-Morley experiment deriving this special relativistic twin paradox was conducted on the earth rotating around Sun, so this rotating twin paradox involves only special relativity, and general relativity cannot fix this real twin paradox.
↑ The recent published paper officially disproved Einstein relativity due to this unsolvable circular twin paradox ( this-p.2-left-2. this-p.2-last-paragraph ).
Einstein relativity lacking the medium (= aether ) needs unreal virtual photons with imaginary mass contradicting Einstein relativity to explain electromagnetic force ( this-p.3 ).
↑ All of these paradoxes clearly show Einstein relativity is false.
Contrary to a lot of overhyped fake news, Einstein relativity is useless for any technologies such as GPS and PET, just leading to unreal extradimensional unified theory.
In Einstein relativity lacking the absolute frame, all things' motions are relative and changeable as seen by different observers.
This-2nd-last-paragraph says -- Motion is relative ?
"this is the relativity in the theory of relativity: all motion is relative. If Einstein rode past me on his bicycle, I could only say that he is moving from my perspective. From his perspective, he could rightly claim that he was fixed still and that I was the one in motion."
This Einstein relativity lacking the real absolute frame causes kinetic energy paradox and violation of energy conservation, which needs paradoxical gravitational wave.
For example, in the upper figure-lower, a small object (= m ) at rest is accelerated to a speed v by a small spring energy (= 1/2kx2 ).
But in Einstein relativity lacking the absolute frame (= medium ), we have to consider the unrealistic frame seen by this object m where all heavier things including the earth appear to be accelerated to a speed v by the far-smaller spring energy, which clearly violates total energy conservation.
So Einstein relativity is
wrong, cannot conserve energy.
There is
only one real frame (= static with respect to the real medium ) where total energy and momentum are conserved.
(Fig.A) Snell's law and light wave ripple when stellar light hits the moving earth ether prove stellar aberration is seen also in the light medium moving with the earth (= ether drag ). So Einstein relativity is wrong.
Contrary to wrong textbooks' explanation, the stellar aberration (= light emitted from a distance star appears to be inclined by the earth's motion ) can be observed also in the light medium (= ether ) moving or dragged by the earth (= compatible with Michelson-Morley experiment where light travels in the earth medium at the constant speed c, too ).
As shown in the upper figure, when light emitted from a distant star hits the ether (= medium ) dragged by the earth, this hitting generates the light ripple in the moving earth ether in the oblique direction due to action-reaction law, which is observed as stellar aberration (= so the ether dragged by the earth is real ).
In wrong explanations you often see in textbooks falsely saying the real ether dragged by the earth cannot cause stellar aberration ( this-p.2 ), even when the star's light hits the ether (= light medium ) moving with the earth, this unrealistically does Not generate the light ripple by ignoring action-reaction law.
As shown in the upper figure, the light emitted from a distant star appears to be traveling in the outer space slightly faster than light, as seen by the earth moving at a speed of v.
When this light enters the medium moving with the earth, the light speed becomes the constant c.
According to Snell's law, the ratio of the light angles (= singθ1/sinθ2 ) is approximately 1 due to the almost same light velocities in the outer space and the earth medium.
As a result, the light path remains inclined (= θ2 is not zero ) also in the earth medium that can observe the stellar aberration.
↑ If textbooks' (wrong) idea that the ether dragged by the earth cannot explain aberration ( this-p.2, this middle ) is right, The angle θ2 must be zero, which means the light speed inside the earth medium must be unrealistically zero (= which is Not the case ), so the aberration is compatible with the ether (= medium ) moving with the earth, after all.
This-p.3-Discussion says "The empirical aberration evidence supporting the dragged ether theory is thus overwhelming."
(Fig.V) Einstein relativity rejecting the real medium needs unreal virtual photons with imaginary mass, which disproves Einstein.
Einstein relativity rejecting the light medium paradoxically needs fictional virtual photons with imaginary mass to explain electromagnetic force and photoelectric effect ( this-p.16 ).
Without the medium, an electron can emit or absorb only unreal virtual photons with imaginary mass (= m2 < 0 ) paradoxically disobeying Einstein relativistic energy-mass relation called off mass shell ( this-p.3, this-p.4-6, this-5th-paragraph ).
The reliance on these unreal virtual photons disproves Einstein relativity and the unphysical relativistic quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) giving only meaningless infinities that must be illegitimately removed by renormalization ( this-p.4-5 ), which ad-hoc QED trick, which cannot predict any physical values, was criticized by many physicists ( this-1st-paragraph ).
(Fig.T) Einstein relativity is wrong, needing unreal quantum mechanical parallel universes in two slit interference.
A single particle such as an electron is known to interfere with itself in two-slit experiments.
We can naturally say an electron generates real de Broglie wave in the medium causing interference (= de Broglie wave instead of a single electron can pass two slits realistically ).
But in the unphysical Einstein relativity rejecting the medium (= aether ), a single electron has to split into multiple (fictional) parallel universes (= one electron unrealistically splits into two slits ) to interfere with itself by the paradoxical quantum mechanical wave-particle duality.
↑ As a result, disproving Einstein relativity rejecting the real medium by fatal paradoxes is equal to disproving quantum mechanical wave-particle duality in fantasy parallel universes.
Real de Broglie wave (= whose wave phase is moving with a moving electron ) disproves the unphysical quantum mechanical static probability wavefunctions that cannot be changed nor moved.
Interference of an electron definitely needs some external medium, because the electron alone (in the vaccuum containing nothing ) cannot push itself to cause destructive or constructive interference patterns.
↑ Because even when the electron tries to push itself, the electron is pushed back from itself due to action-reaction law, which total force on the electron is zero, which cannot push the electron from destructive interference area toward the constructive interference area.
(Fig.P) Light refraction due to different light speeds in different mediums cannot be explained by Einstein relativity rejecting the medium or a unreal photon particle.
Light is clearly wave traveling and interfering in the medium as shown in Light refraction caused by the difference in light speeds in different mediums according to Huygens principle.
Einstein relativity rejecting the light medium (= aether ) needs an unreal photon particle that cannot explain light interference nor refraction (= a photon particle can only collide with each other without interference ).
Because in the light refraction, a (illusory) photon particle has to unreasonably slow down and accelerate at some definite angles by some fictional forces, each time it enters different mediums, which also contradicts Einstein relativity of the constant light speed c.
(Fig.K) K' moving at the same speed as the electron-1 moving at v paradoxically sees the electron-1 accelerating by losing light energy.
Einstein relativistic theory rejecting the medium (= luminiferous aether ) has No absolute frame in the space where what objects are moving (= with kinetic energy ) or stationary (= with No kinetic energy ) are changed depending on which observers are seeing them.
So according to the paradoxical Einstein relativity, an electron-1, which is moving at speed of v emitting light energy and generating de Broglie wave interference as seen by the stationary K, paradoxically appears to stop with No kinetic energy (= but emitting and losing light wave energy ! ), Not generating de Broglie wave interference (= de Broglie wavelength changes depending on the particle's velocity ) as seen by K' moving at the same speed as the electron-1.
As shown in photoelectric effect, the electron's kinetic energy is absolute energy (= contradicting relativistic energy ) that can be converted into light wave energy related to light frequency.
The observer K' moving at the same speed v as the electron-1 paradoxically sees the stationary electron with No kinetic energy losing light energy and accelerating in the opposite direction, which clearly violates energy conservation law, disproving Einstein relativity.
Einstein relativity lacking the absolute frame (= medium ) is false, violating energy or momentum conservation law.
The only legitimate solution to this relativistic kinetic energy (= light-emitting ) paradox violating energy conservation is that an electron moving relative to the real light medium has kinetic energy to emit light energy and generate de Broglie wave interference (and Lorentz magnetic force ) regardless of observers, which rejected Einstein relativity.
(Fig.E) Einstein relativity is false, cannot conserve energy nor momentum.
Einstein (general) relativity lacking absolute frame (= which objects are moving is uncertain and changed as seen by different observers in Relativity ) is false, cannot conserve energy nor momentum.
In the upper figure, a man on a skateboard is pulling a rope connected to the wall fixed to the earth, and accelerating to a speed v.
↑ In the Einstein relativity lacking the absolute frame, we need to consider the unreal rest frame of this man who sees the whole world including the earth pulled and moved by the very small force of a man pulling the rope, which clearly violates conservation of total energy and momentum, disproving Einstein relativity.
Einstein relativity needs the unreal rest frame of the earth where the heavier Sun is rotating around the lighter earth in Michelson-Morley experiment measuring the constant light speed c on the earth, causing serious twin paradox.
So Einstein relativity is wrong, needing the old fictional geocentric theory ( this-7th-paragraph ) which can Not conserve total energy and momentum due to the heavier Sun orbiting the lighter earth like the unreal spin-orbit magnetic energy where a heavier nucleus orbits a lighter electron.
A man cannot pull the earth.
The heavier Sun cannot orbit around the lighter earth by violating conservation of total momentum, energy and action-reaction law.
As a result, there is only one real frame conserving total energy and momentum in the universe, which disagrees with Einstein relativity lacking the absolute frame (= ether or medium ).
(Fig.R) An electron and a proton increase their kinetic and relativistic energy, but the total (relativistic) energy of a hydrogen (= H ) atom decreases due to the lower potential energy in the medium (= Not particles' kinetic energy ), which fact disproves Einstein.
Einstein relativistic (kinetic) energy mc2 is unreal, increasing or decreasing as seen by different observers, violating energy conservation law, because Einstein lacks the real absolute frame or ether.
Einstein relativistic energy is wrong, because it needs the potential energy ( this-3rd-paragraph ) stored in the medium disproving Einstein relativity rejecting the medium.
In the upper figure, an electron and a proton separated by an infinite distance (= with zero Coulomb potential energy ) are stationary (= No kinetic energy ) with only the rest mass energy of m0c2.
When this electron and the proton attract each other and form a hydrogen (= H ) atom, their kinetic and relativistic energy related to the particle's velocity increases (= an electron starts to be moving around the proton inside a H atom due to Virial theorem ).
But the total (relativistic) energy of the H atom decreases due to the lower Coulomb attractive potential energy between an electron and a proton ( this-p.4 ).
↑ This is paradox, because the total relativistic energy of the H atom decreases due to the potential energy in the medium which Einstein rejected, around the electron and the proton whose kinetic energy increases.
Actually the mass energy equation of mc2 was first derived by classical Maxwell theory (= with the medium = No need for paradoxical Einstein relativity ), which was illegitimately copied by the paradoxical Einstein relativity. later ( this-p.3~ ).
(Fig.Q) Einstein relativistic theory rejecting the real medium causes unphysical quantum mechanical wavefunction with wave-particle duality or parallel universes.
As shown in fatal relativistic paradoxes such as Lorentz force, twin, length, kinetic energy, de Broglie wave, faster-than-light-Sagnac effect, mc2 energy Not conserving energy, contradictory gravitational wave, black hole, Einstein relativity is officially proven wrong.
The fact that Einstein relativity rejecting the medium (= ether, this-p.10 ) is wrong means the electron's de Broglie wave is real wave generated in the real medium (= agreeing with stellar aberration ), which real separable particle and de Broglie wave (in real two-slit experiments ) disproves quantum mechanical unphysical wavefunction or wave-particle duality against reality, too.
Real de Broglie wave whose wave phase is constantly changing with a moving electron disproves the unphysical quantum mechanical static probability wavefunctions that cannot be changed nor moved nor express real movable electrons.
Einstein relativistic theory introduced the paradoxical Lorentz transformation or time dilation by trying to explain the constant light speed c on the earth without the real medium (= aether ) in space.
So in this unphysical Einstein relativistic world without the real medium in space, physicists have to unrealistically treat each electrons as a particle and wave simultaneously called wave-particle duality.
Quantum mechanics based on this paradoxical Einstein relativity lacking the medium claims a single electron (unrealistically) splits into many different places by (fictional) quantum superposition or parallel universes to interfere with itself in two-slit experiments ( this-2nd-last-paragraph, this-4-5th-paragraphs ).
↑ If Einstein relativity is wrong, we can naturally explain this contradictory wave-particle duality and two-slit-experiment of a single electron's interference by separating a real electron particle and real de Broglie wave generated around the electron.
An electron cannot influence or change its own motion due to action and reaction law (= even when the electron pushes itself, the electron is pushed backed by itself by the same amount of force due to action-reaction law, so the electron cannot move to constructive interference region ) in two-slit interference experiment of a single electron or stable quantized orbits.
↑ Some external medium except the electron needs to push the electron from destructive into the constructive interference area, which medium disproves Einstein relativity and quantum mechanical wave-particle duality falsely claiming the same electron can be a particle and wave at the same time.
Energy levels of atoms such as a hydrogen are observed to be restricted to some quantized values or orbits ( this-last ).
Quantum mechanical unphysical wave-particle duality and Einstein relativity rejecting the real medium cannot explain these experimentally-observed quantized energies, so false.
Because an electron alone (= without the medium ) in the quantum mechanical hydrogen atom cannot push itself to restrict itself to observed quantized energy levels (= an electron pushing itself is pushed back by itself, canceling the force due to action-reaction law ).
So a real moving electron needs to generate external de Broglie wave in the medium whose wave phases of positive (= where an electron exist ) and negative need to avoid destructive interference in orbits with an integer times de Broglie wavelength to restrict an electron to the observed quantized energy levels or orbits.
This fact shows quantum mechanical wavefunction or wave-particle duality is wrong, and the real Bohr's atomic model with real electrons and de Broglie wave is the only right model conserving total energy.
A photon particle is illusion just light wave ( contradictory virtual photons with imaginary mass are unreal ) in the medium.
Due to paradoxical Einstein relativity rejecting medium, physicists unable to separate a real electron particle and real de Broglie wave generated in the medium have to use unphysical quantum mechanical probability wavefunction or contradictory wave-particle duality.
This quantum mechanical ( paradoxical ) probability wavefunction is unrealistic, based on unscientific superposition where each electron must exist in all places at once in fantasy parallel universes until measured, like in two slit experiments of a single electron or a photon.
Physicists can Not determine each electron's position (= uncertainty principle ) in this unphysical quantum mechanical probability wavefunction allegedly expressing an electron and wave simultaneously (= wave-particle duality ) that always includes impossible negative kinetic energy area.
Furthermore, quantum mechanical electrons in s orbitals are said to have (unreal) zero orbital angular momentums, which means those electrons moving in linear orbits (= zero orbital angular momentum ) always crash into nuclei, and their de Broglie wave causes destructive interference, and become unstable.
↑ All these paradoxical unphysical quantum mechanical probability wavefunction can be replaced by real atomic model based on real electrons (= non-zero angular momentum, so not crashing into a nucleus ) and de Broglie wave.
Quantum mechanical unphysical spreading wavefunction due to wave-particle duality has to rely on unphysical exchange energy (+ paradoxical superluminal electron spinning ) based on pseudo-kinetic energy change caused by the wavefunction interference (= hampering science due to shapeless wavefunction ) to express Pauli repulsion, which can be naturally replaced by real de Broglie wave interference.
Einstein relativity is wrong due to its fatal paradox.
So the hydorgen's excited energy levels' small energy splitting between 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 energy states called fine structure is caused Not by the (paradoxical) relativistic spin-orbit magnetic energy ( this p.6 ) where a heavier nucleus must orbit a lighter electron unrealistically in quantum mechanical Dirac hydrogen, but by real Bohr-Sommerfeld model's fine structure without spin.
This p.14-4th and last paragraphs says -- Real Bohr model
"Sommerfeld's fine-structure formula was spectroscopically confirmed for
H and for hydrogenic ions (He+,
Li2+, ...) to the highest precision—the greatest triumph
of the old quantum theory"
"Over a decade later, after the electron spin had
been discovered, relativistic quantum mechanics
(Dirac 1928) obtained the fine-structure formula (Gordon 1928) along a very
different route....
yields the same energies as Sommerfeld’s formula"
This-3rd-last-paragraph says -- Dirac copied Sommerfeld
"When Dirac developed relativistic quantum mechanics, the relativistic Coulomb problem proved to be exactly solvable ...But the resulting formula for the energy levels was truly a surprise: The new answer was precisely the old Sommerfeld formula !"
This realistic Bohr-Sommerfeld model relies on Maxwell's authentic mc2 energy (= classical Maxwell theory first proved the energy E stored in the medium has mass m equal to E/c2 ) that was copied as the paradoxical relativistic mass later by Einstein.
Einstein relativity is paradoxical and wrong, which means all relativistic quantum theories such as QED, quantum field theory and standard model using paradoxical virtual particles with imaginary masses are wrong, too.
Today's only theory of everything allegedly unifying Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics is fictional extra-dimensional string theory ( this-4th-last-paragraph ), which is also wrong, if Einstein relativity is wrong.
Actually, these unphysical QED and particle physics are completely useless, just wasting huge taxpayer's money in unnecessary gigantic colliders.
This or this overhyped news on relativistic chemical bonds ↓
3rd-paragraph says -- Fake relativistic molecule
"the researchers show evidence that when atomic nuclei are sufficiently heavy, the principles described in Einstein's theory of relativity change the structure of triple bonds — blurring the lines between the two separate types of bonds involved in textbook triple bonding." ← false.
4th-last-paragraph says -- No proof of Relativity
"The photoelectron spectrum showed that the carbon-bismuth bonds did not fit the traditional triple-bond picture of one sigma and two pi bonds. Instead, the structure looks more like one pi bond and two hybrid sigma-pi bonds." ← This alone cannot be evidence of Einstein relativity.
↑ This research paper-abstract and p.1-right (or p.3-right) say -- Using non-relativistic equation
"To interpret the experimental observations, we carried
out fully relativistic four-component Dirac-Coulomb (DC) coupled-cluster (= CC ) calculations (= non-relativistic, this-1st-paragraph )"
↑ The relativistic Dirac equation cannot give exact solution for any multi-electron atoms ( this or this-p.17(or p.1 )-2nd-paragraph ), so there is No evidence of relativistic effect in this multi-electron molecules of Bi-C contrary to the above fake news.
The solution of the relativistic Dirac equation's one-electron hydrogen atom with the paradoxical spin-orbit interaction accidentally agreed with the real Bohr-Sommerfeld's hydrogen without spin ( this-p.2-1st-paragraph, this-p.1-last~p.2 ).
↑ It means any relativistic effects of heavy atoms are caused by electrons moving faster which are harder to accelerate due to Maxwell's mc2 ( this-p.3~ ) irrelevant to the paradoxical Einstein relativity or spin-orbit interaction.
Both non-relativistic Schrodinger equation and relativistic Dirac equation are unsolvable for any multi-electron atoms.
For the unsolvable multi-electron atomic Schrodinger or Dirac equations, this research used the approximate coupled cluster (= CC, CCSD, this-p.2-intro ) which is a wrong non-variational theory that can choose wrong solutions or unreal trial wavefunctions (= basis sets ) that give wrong energy lower than true atomic lowest ground-state energy.
This-p.1-left-1st-paragraph says -- Wrong CC approximation
"it is worth noting that
CCSD (= coupled cluster ) is not variational, and it is also not guaranteed
to give real-valued energies."
↑ Relying on wrong approximate CC methods for unsolvable multi-electron relativistic Dirac equations means there is No evidence of Einstein relativity not only in one-electron hydrogen atom but also any multi-electron atoms (= ex Bi-C in this research ).
Feel free to link to this site.
.PNG){kind=link}
