Home page
Einstein is wrong
Twin paradox is real
(Fig.1) A very long stick K' starts to accelerate at the acceleration of α at time t = t' = 0 with respect to the stationary K observers in the right direction.
According to the unphysical Einstein relativity, a moving clock ticks slower, which causes twin paradox where which clock is moving or running slower is paradoxical.
For twins (= one remains stationary, the other twin is moving ) to compare their clocks' time speeds, one of twins departing from the other twin has to accelerate (= or decelerate ) to return to the original place (= where the other twin is waiting ), which needs to consider general relativistic accelerated frame called Rindler transformation ( this p.3-right-V, this p.4 ).
But this general relativistic accelerated frame (= Rindler coordinate ) is too unrealistic, and causing another fatal paradox, so unable to solve twin paradox after all. ← Einstein relativity is false.
As shown in Fig.1, a very long stick K' starts to accelerate at the acceleration of α toward the right at the time t = t' = 0 with respect to the stationary observers K (= the initial coordinate of the stick K' at rest at the start t = t' = 0 is the same as K like x = x' ).
The position (= x ) and time (= t ) of the stationary observer K frame (= normal inertial frame without general relativity ).
The position (= x' ) and time (= t' ) of clocks moving with the accelerating stick K' frame.
In general relativity, the accelerating frame seen by the accelerating stick K' (= K' rest frame ) is called Rindler coordinate.
In this relativistic accelerating Rindler frame, clocks in the position of x < -c2/α (= x' < -c2/α at the initial time t = t' = 0, x = x' ) unrealistically cannot advance to the future.
↑ It means all things existing in the places of x < -c2/α (= x' < -c2/α ), whose K clock time is always negative ( t < 0, ← only the time t' in K' can pass to positive or future ), can only return to the past, which is like artificial unrealistic black hole called Rindler horizon ( this-middle-Horizon and Rindler wedge, this-2nd-paragraph, this p.9-left-last ).
↑ It is clearly paradox disproving Einstein relativity, because in normal frame (= involving only special relativity ) in Fig.1-upper, the clocks moving with K' stick run slightly slower than the stationary K frame's clock, according to special relativity (= dt' < dt ).
But when seen by the accelerating K' stick, the K clock ticks slower, returning even to negative time in the places of x < -c2/α (= dt' > dt ).
Furthermore, in the larger x positions of x > -c2/α, the clocks run faster, and the light speed can unrealistically exceed c ( this-p.11-(70) ).
As a result, general relativistic acceleration frame is unrealistic, unable to solve twin paradox, hence, Einstein relativistic theory is proven to be wrong.
(Fig.2) General relativistic accelerated frame (= Rindler coordinate ) needs to unrealistically expand a rigid stick K' to infinite length.
Relativistic accelerated frame seen by the uniformly accelerating stick K' or observer is called Rindler coordinate.
In this accelerating Rindler frame ( this p.39 ), the rigid stick needs to unrealistically expand in the right and left directions, as shown in Fig.2-lower, which disproves Einstein relativity.
Because in this Rindler coordinate transformation, all parts of x' < -c2/α (= called Rindler horizon ) in the rigid stick have to unrealistically expand in the negative x direction, while the other parts have to expand in the positive x direction ( this p.39 ).
↑ As shown in Fig.2-lower-①, all parts of x' > -c2/α inside the stick expands to large x position as the time t' goes by, while all parts of x' < -c2/α inside the stick expands toward the negative x position with time (= Fig.2-③ ).
Correctly speaking, the stick is rigid, so the stick length seen by the K' moving with the stick must remain the same.
↑ But this generates new paradoxes where all (rigid) things in K frame appear to be shrinking, and it also causes fatal time paradox. This paradox in rigid objects' length is related to the paradoxical Lorentz length contraction where the length of a moving rigid thing is unrealistically contracted, violating the definition of rigid body or energy-force conservation law (= expanding or shrinking the moving rigid objects should need unrealistically larger energy than just the kinetic energy ).
As shown in the controversial Bell spaceship paradox, this unrealistic Lorentz length contraction of a rigid object clearly contradicts the basic physical law (= a rigid body cannot be contracted or expanded when it is just accelerated or moved, because the atomic force F keeping the same rigid body's shape remains strong regardless of any motion, so changing the rigid body shape needs unrealistic force or energy far larger than the mere kinetic energy )
(Fig.3) Light can Not be emitted at time t = 1 from the position of x < -c2/α only when seen by accelerating K' stick (= but when seen by K frame, the same light is emitted at t = 1 and overtakes the stick ), which is clearly paradox.
In the normal frame (= seen by K frame observer at rest ), light emitted from the position of x < -c2/α at the time t = 1 can reach some (positive) positions such as x = 0 or 1 within finite time of t or t' (= this light can overtake the stick ahead ).
But according to the relativistic accelerated Rindler frame, this light is Not emitted from the position of x = -c2/α or x < -c2/α due to these positions' times being always zero or negative time like t < 0 (= never advance to t = 1 ) , hence the light can never reach the position of x = 0 or 1 nor overtake the stick (= x > -c2/α ) even after infinite time t' has passed ( this p.5-(8) ).
As shown in Fig.3-lower, in cases of ( c2/α + x' ) < 0 (= positions of x' < -c2/α, which is equal to x < -c2/α forever ), the time t in K frame can never advance to the positive (= t = 1 ) from the initial t = 0 (= so this time t unrealistically can only return to the past of the negative time t < 0, and the light can never be emitted at t = 1 ) in any positive t' time, seen by the accelerating K' stick.
But of course, in the normal frame (= K is at rest ), the same light can be emitted at the time t = 1 from the x < -c2/α position (= even the clock at x < -c2/α does Not return to the past like the unrealistic accelerated frame ), and overtake the stick ahead.
↑ Whether light is emitted or not depending on observers is paradoxical, disproving Einstein relativity.
This corresponds to the artificial unrealistic black hole called Rindler horizon suddenly appearing only when seen by the accelerating observer or stick ( this p.1-lower~p.2, this p.11-last-paragraph ) due to the paradoxical gravitational (= accelerating ) time dilation.
This-middle Horizons and Rindler wedges says
"For a uniformly accelerating observer, there exists a Rindler horizon, which is a boundary beyond which the observer can neither see nor influence any events. This concept is analogous to the event horizon of a black hole"
(Fig.4) Relativistic accelerated Rindler coordinate transformation is unreal.
Fig.4 shows the general relativistic accelerated Rindler frame (= seen by the observer or stick with acceleration of α, this p.5-(8), this p.8, this p.3-(11), this p.2-last ).
This artificial acceleration Rindler transformation causes artificial gravitational time dilation ( this p.39-40, this p.3-5, this p.8-lower, this p.4 ) and unreal black hole called Rindler horizon ( this-10th-paragraph ).
↑ Strictly speaking, this Rindler frame's artificial gravitational time dilation ( 1 + x'α/c2 ) dt' is different from the general relativistic gravitational time dilation using square root, so violating equivalence principle.
The general relativistic gravitational time dilation originally has fatal clock-time paradox (= each clock shows paradoxical different times even inside one accelerated or gravitational frame ), so general relativistic or gravitational time dilation is wrong.
Twin paradox can Not be solved even by this (unrealistic) general relativistic accelerated frame, hence, Einstein relativity is proved to be wrong ( they claim only in special approximate case of acceleration g → ∞, the time difference T → 0 avoiding black hole, twin paradox may be solved, this p.6-middle, this p.4-left-last-paragraph, ← actually, twin paradox is unsolved ).
Seen from the accelerating stick, all things (= K ) around the stick appear to be accelerating in the opposite direction, which looks like fictitious gravity (= it is as if the fictitious universal force acts on all things around the stick ) in the opposite direction causing general relativistic time dilation in K frame, they insist.
↑ The stick itself pulled by another local force (= this local force pulling the stick is not universal gravity acting on all things, so no time dilation ) does not feel this fictitious gravity in the opposite direction (= this fictitious gravity caused by the fictitious acceleration only when seen by the accelerating stick does not act on the stick itself, which is stationary, not accelerated in the stick's rest frame ), so all clocks' time (= t' ) in all x' positions inside (= at rest relative to) the stick (= in the stick rest frame ) run at the same pace, causing fatal time paradox.
If the clocks in different positions x' or x inside the K' stick or the stationary K frame really run at different paces (= this paradoxical clock time difference remains even after the stick stops accelerating, and keeps moving at the same speed ) as shown in general relativity, it causes serious time paradox, disproving Einstein.
Feel free to link to this site.
