Sagnac effect denies Einstein relativity.

Home page
Einstein relativity is wrong

GPS, Sagnac effect showing faster or slower than light speed c due to the earth's motion disproves Einstein relativity based on the constant light speed c.

(Fig.1)  GPS, Michelson-Morley (= Gale-Pearson ) experiments showed light speed is changed by the earth rotation and disproved Einstein relativity.

Einstein relativity is proven wrong

Einstein relativity says light speed must be always the constant c as seen by any observers, which is wrong.

Einstein relativistic Lorentz transformation is based on the postulate that light speed must be always the constant c when measured by any moving or stationary observers ( this-middle ).

GPS measures faster-than-light signal, which disproves Einstein.

But the speed of light emitted by GPS is observed to be faster or slower than the light speed c, depending on the earth (= observer ) moving speed, which is called Sagnac effect disproving Einstein relativity claiming the observed light speed must be always the same c ( this-abstract,  this-abstract, ).

This-last-8.conclusion says
"These non-constant light speed values c±v induced by the rotation of the Earth contradict the ( relativistic ) postulate of light speed constancy"

The actually-observed faster-than-light GPS signal must have unreal imaginary mass and imaginary time ( v > c ), which disprove Einstein relativity.

Michelson-Gale experiment measures faster-than-light.

Also in Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment, they measured two lights traveling at faster or slower than light speed c due to the detector rotating with the rectangular circuit.

↑ All these GPS and Michelson-Gale experiments clearly contradict Einstein relativistic theory based on the same constant light speed c measured irrelevant to motion of the earth or observers.  ← Textbooks tend to hide this inconvenient truth ( this p.3-discussion~p.4 ).

Einstein is wrong, cannot explain faster-than-light.

Light medium moving with the earth, independent of the earth's spinning can explain the faster-than-light Sagnac effect.

All ad-hoc general and special relativistic solutions to GPS observing faster or slower than light speed in Sagnac effect are wrong, unable to explain why the light speed is affected only by the earth's spinning, and Not affected by the earth rotating around the Sun.

This p.1-lower, p.3-conclusion says
"in the global positioning system (GPS)... From these light travel time differences these researchers deduced light speeds c - v eastward and c + v (= faster than light speed c ) westward relative to the surface of the Earth where v is the speed of rotation of the Earth’s surface at the particular latitude"

"one-way light speed is Not the same in all directions as required by the light speed constancy postulate of special relativity."

Light medium moving with the earth agrees with all experiments.

Only the real medium moving with the earth (= but this medium unfixed to the earth spinning like free atmosphere ) can explain the why speed of light emitted by GPS is changed only by the earth's spinning, Not by the earth moving around Sun (= constant light speed c in Michelson-Morley experiment ) in addition to aberration.

Like the atmosphere, only near the earth's surface, the medium colliding with buildings or something appear to (= actually Not ) be dragged by the earth spinning, which explains the faster or slower-than-light signal emitted from GPS distant from the earth's surface.

The light medium can also explain Michelson-Gale experiment (= rotating vacuum rectangular loop measures faster-than-light ).

↑ This inconvenient truth is hidden by textbooks and the overhyped media repeating empty phrases "Einstein was right again !"

Einstein relativity cannot explain why the light speed is changed only by the earth spinning, Not by the earth rotating around Sun.

(Fig.2)  Light speed c is changed only by the earth rotation (= spinning ), which cannot be explained by Einstein relativity.

Einstein is wrong in faster-than-light Sagnac effect.

Einstein relativity cannot explain why the light speed is changed only by the earth's spinning, Not changed by the satellite's velocity

GPS, Michelson-Gale experiments (= conducted in the vacuum ), Sagnac effect clearly showed the light can travel faster (= c + v ) or slower (= c - v ) than the light speed c when measured by the observers moving at a velocity of v ( This p.1-lower,  this p.3-discussion ), which disproves Einstein relativity and Lorentz transformation based on the same light speed c regardless of motions of light sources and observers ( this-Einstein's two postulates ).

↑ If Einstein "relativistic" motion is right, the observed light speed must be changed not only by observers' or earth's motion ( this-6th-paragraph ) but also by the velocity of the light source = GPS satellite (= emitting light ).  But paradoxically the speed of light c is not affected by the light-source = satellite speed ( this p.18-19,  this p.4 ) which only causes Doppler shift (= light wavelength change ).

↑ If the light speed c is faster or slower by the velocity of light sources such as satellites and atoms, the speed of light emitted by atoms (= which can move at almost light speed c ) can be very slower = 0 = c - c (or faster = 2c = c + c ) than c, which does not happen.

Faster-than-light Sagnac effect is officially accepted.

The claim that light speed is always measured to be the constant c even in Sagnac effect is completely wrong.

We can easily prove light measured by the moving detectors can be faster or slower than light speed c (= in this case, objects or light moving faster than light should have unreal imaginary mass in relativistic mass of v > c ) which disproves Einstein relativity.

Even the recent published papers officially admit the light speed measured by the moving observers is anisotropic (= faster or slower than light speed c depending on observers' or the earth's motion, which contradicts Einstein relativity, this-lower-8.conclusion ).

Light speed is anisotropic (= faster or slower than c )

This-p.7-2nd-paragraph (2024) says
"the one-way speed of light is anisotropic (= faster or slower than light speed c ) in inertial frames, which agrees with the experimental results (= disagreeing with Einstein relativity, this-1st-paragraph )"

This-p.6-6th-paragraph says
"In other words, the SRT (= special relativistic theory ) correctly applied to a rotating Sagnac Interferometer does Not predict the Sagnac Effect."

Wrong paper sticking to the constant light speed c.

So the claims that light speed should be always the constant c even when measured by the moving detector S, baselessly saying the lack of synchronization or something ( this-p.12-13 ) are completely wrong (= the faster or slower-than-light speed can be measured only by one same rotating detector S which one clock's measurement means perfect synchronization ).

Einstein relativity cannot explain Sagnac effect.

General relativity admits faster-than-light speed, which contradicts the relativistic mass energy.

So the general relativistic Sagnac effect started to say the contradictory thing where the light speed is the constant c only with respect to the stationary earth (= admitting one absolute frame or aether stationary with respect to the earth contradicting Einstein relativity, this p.6-upper,  this p.3-lower~p.4 ).

This-p5-left, p.9-conclusions say general relativity or GPS system chooses the earth-centered inertial (= ECI ) frame as one absolute frame (= contradicts relativistic theory ) that can measure the constant light speed c (= in other rorating frames, faster or slower-than-light speed is measured )

Objects moving faster than light have unreal imaginary mass.

General relativity admits the light speed observed by the rotating earth can be faster or slower than c (= in this case, a thing or light moving faster than light has unreal imaginary mass disagreeing with relativistic mass ) depending on the rotating direction (= anisotropic ) by using fictional Coriolis force speed-up or slow-down conveniently changed by the light's moving direction.

This-p.4-6 conclusions say
"the speed of light varies by c ± ωr in one or the other direction around the disk.... the apparent variation of the speed of light is... gravitational Coriolis time dilation (= No such thing as Coriolis time dilation conveniently changing the light speed faster or slower depending on the light's traveling directions even in official relativity though )"

Einstein relativity cannot explain why the light speed is affected only by the earth's spinning, Not by the earth rotating around the Sun.

↑ But if this ad-hoc general relativistic interpretation of Sagnac effect was right, the earth is also rotating around Sun or galactic center at a speed much faster than the earth spinning, so the light speed observed on the earth must be affected by the earth moving around the Sun or galactic center, which light speed change cannot be detected (= as shown in Michelson-Morley or GPS ), paradoxically.

As a result, both special and general relativity are proved to be wrong, disagreeing with the observed light speed.

Only the light medium can explain Sagnac effect.

The medium (= aether ) moving with the earth (= but unfixed to the earth spinning ) can explain this Sagnac effect and stellar aberration.

These Sagnac effect (= light speed is changed by observer's motion ) is one of ordinary classical mechanical effects ( this p.1-right-2 ) contradicting Einstein relativity (= due to light speed c changed by observers' velocity ), contrary to the misleading word of the relativistic Sagnac effect ( this-lower-conclusions ).

This p.8-5-conclusion-2nd-paragraph says
"The positive result of the Sagnac experiment is significant. The experiment was sufficient proof that the velocity of light can be added to or subtracted from in accordance with the classical law of addition of velocities but in contradistinction to the relativistic law which makes the velocity of light absolute and independent of motion of the observer or the source of light"

This Sagnac effect and Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiments are consistent with the light medium (= aether ) moving with the earth (= light speed is the constant c inside this earth medium.  ← this can perfectly explain aberration, too ), but this earth medium is not fixed to the earth spinning (= light speed is changed only by the earth's spinning, as seen in Sagnac effect.  this p.6 ).

Atmosphere, medium are Not rotating with the earth's spinning, which can explain the GPS faster-than-light Sagnac effect.

Actually, the atmospheric air moving with the earth can move independently of (= not fixed to ) the earth spinning (= air molecules are moving in various directions at very fast speeds, as seen in super-rotation ), because the earth gravity attracts the atmospheric air molecules only in vertical direction, irrelevant to the spinning (= horizontal ) direction.

Only near the earth's surface, the atmosphere and the medium colliding with buildings or something appear to be dragged (= actually Not ) by the earth's spinning, which can explain why signals emitted from satellites distant from the earth's surface are measured to be faster or slower than the light speed c by the earth's spinning.

Light medium explains Michelson-Gale experiment.

Michelson-Gale experiment used the rectangular vacuum pipe (= surrounded by the solid wall ) inside which the light medium substance's velocity is balanced and uniform, which can detect light speed changed by the earth rotation, violating the relativity.

↑ This rectangular circuit's shape doesn't change, and the north and south pipes' velocities are different due to different earth's spinning speeds at different latitudes, so in this Michelson-Gale experiment, the rectangular hollow pipe slightly rotated by the earth, which did not drag the medium inside the hollow pipe in tangential direction, which could detect faster or slower than light speed.

Light medium can explain the faster-than-light in rotating loop.

The hollow rotating ring path does not change or accelerate the light medium's velocity (= or light speed ) in the tangential direction (= because the wall of this rotating vacuum ring tube doesn't push the medium in tangential direction ), which can detect light speed difference between clockwise and anticlockwise seen by the observer rotating with the ring, which disproved Einstein relativity with the constant light speed c seen by any moving observers.  ← Optical fiber case also disagrees with relativity ( this 7th, last-paragraphs ).

A rotating detector can measure the faster and slower than light speed c, which disproves Einstein.

(Fig.3)  Lights traveling clockwise and anticlockwise reach S (= on the loop light path rotating at v ) at different times (= faster or slower than light ), which Sagnac effect contradicts Einstein relativity with the constant light speed c.

Rotating detectors see faster and slower than light.

Light speed c can be faster or slower seen by the rotating observer S, which contradicts Einstein relativity.

In Sagnac effect using optical gyroscopes, two beams of light emitted by a light source S travel clockwise (= red light-2 ) and anticlockwise (= blue light-1 ) inside the loop circuit path rotating at a velocity v clockwise, and return to the S at different times.

From the perspective of the S observer rotating at v, the light-1 travels anticlockwise at a faster light speed c+v, and the light-2 travels clockwise at a slower light speed c-v.

Lights traveling in different directions show different speeds.

Because as seen by the S rotating at a velocity of v, light-1 and light-2 travel the same distance of 2πr (= r is the loop radius which is not Lorentz length contracted by the S rotating in tangential non-radial direction ), and return to the same S at different times at different speeds of faster (= c + v ) or slower (= c - v ) than the light speed c.

This-p.13-(2.5.4) says "light travels with velocities c-v (= slower than light ) and c+v (= faster than light ) for the co and counter rotating beams"

This Sagnac effect (= this faster-than-light motion was experimentally confirmed in the vacuum this 7th-paragraph ) can be naturally explained by the ordinary classical mechanics irrelevant to relativistic theory ( this p.2-p.3 ).

Faster-than-light speed contradicts Einstein

Light traveling faster than light in a rotating loop shows unreal imaginary mass disproving Einstein relativity.

↑ This Sagnac effect where the observed light speed c is changed by the observers' motion (= the rotating S detector ) disproves Einstein relativity that claims the observed light speed must be always constant c ( this-abstract,  this p.2-last-conclusion, ).

Because according to Einstein relativistic mass, any thing moving faster than light must have unreal imaginary mass or imaginary relativistic energy.

This-p.11-2nd-paragraph says "Selleri suggests that the SRT (= special relativistic theory ) should be abandoned and that the isotropy of the speed of light exists in only one privileged reference frame"

Lights traveling in a rotating disc are measured to be faster and slower than light speed c, disproving Einstein.

(Fig.4)  S in the loop rotating at a speed v measures faster (= c +v ) and slower (= c - v ) than light speed, disproving Einstein relativity.

Faster-than-light can be observed in a rotating loop.

Light is measured to be faster or slower than c by the rotating loop's detector, which disproves Einstein relativity.

In the upper Fig.4, S and the loop are rotating at a velocity of v clockwise, and S emits light-1 counterclockwise and light-2 clockwise at the same time t_s = 0 (= t_s is time measured in the rotating S clock ) or t = 0 (= t is the time measured in stationary clocks outside the loop in the inertial frame ).

When the outside stationary clock time is t = t₁, the rotating or moving S clock time is slightly slower or time-dilated t_s = square root of (1-v²/c²) t₁ due to the moving clock running slower.  ← The rotating S clock's time can be easily monitored and confirmed by the outside clocks.

Light-1 travels 2πr (= r is the radius of the loop ) as seen by the rotating observer S, because the the radius r seen by the rotating S is unchanged, not Lorentz length contracted (= because S moving in the tangential direction, Not in the radial direction ), which also causes Ehrenfest paradox disproving Einstein relativity.

As a result, the rotating S measures the light-1 traveling faster than-light ( > c ), as shown in this, which contradicts Einstein relativity ( wrongly ) claiming the light speed must be always the same c as measured by any moving observers.

In the same way, this rotating observer S measures light-2 traveling slower-than-light speed ( < c ), which also contradicts Einstein relativity.

Faster than light = unreal imaginary mass

A thing moving faster than light must have unreal imaginary mass or energy, which Sagnac effect disproves Einstein relativistic mass-energy.

According to Einstein relativistic mass, light traveling faster than light speed c must have unreal imaginary mass (or unreal imaginary energy ), and light traveling slower than light must have unreal zero energy (= due to photon's zero rest mass ), which contradicts experimental results.

As a result, Einstein relativity is proven wrong.

In fact, this rotating loop also exposes twin paradox (= which clock inside or outside the loop runs slower is paradoxical ) disproving Einstein relativity.

Which clocks inside or outside the rotating loop are moving and running slower is paradoxical, disproving Einstein.

(Fig.5)   Which clock inside or outside the loop is moving and running slower is paradox, disproving Einstein relativity

Which clocks tick slower is paradoxical.

Whether clocks rotating with the loop tick slower or faster than the outside clocks is paradoxical.

All clocks and S inside the loop are rotating at the same speed v clockwise as seen by stationary clocks outside the loop (= all clocks rotating inside the loop must run at the same pace with each other symmetrically, which can be easily monitored and confirmed by the outside stationary clocks ).

Einstein says moving clocks tick slower than stationary clocks.

↑ Clocks rotating with the loop and the outside stationary clocks exist in the same places along the loop, so they can measure each other's time and confirm all clocks rotating at the same speed inside the loop tick at the same pace with each other, which should be uniformly slightly slower than the outside stationary clocks according to Einstein relativity.

As a result, when the rotating S measures light traveling faster or slower than light speed, the light must be actually traveling at faster or slower than light speed uniformly in every place along the loop (= because all rotating clocks along the loop run at the same pace symmetrically ), which Sagnac effect clearly contradicts Einstein relativity based on the constant light speed c.

As seen by rotating clocks , the outside clocks appear to be rotating and running slower, which causes twin paradox.

But as seen by the rotating clocks and S inside the loop, the outside clocks appear to be moving in the opposite directions, hence, the outside clocks must run slower.

As a result, which clocks inside or outside the loop are rotating and running slower is paradoxical. which twin paradox clearly disproves Einstein relativity in addition to faster-than-light Sagnac effect and ehrenfest paradoxes.

A wrong paper claiming the constant light speed c.

A wrong paper claims lights should always travel at the constant speed c even inside the rotating loop by doubting synchronization.

The rotating S clock clearly can measure light-1 traveling the distance 2πr anticlockwise faster than light c+v and light-2 traveling the same distance of 2πr clockwise slower than light c-v and returning to the original S clock at different times (= only one clock S is used, so this is perfect "synchronization" ), which clearly disproves Einstein relativity.

But this wrong paper claiming this rotating S always measures both light-1 and light-2 traveling at the same c, ignoring the fact that light-1 and light-2 travel the same distance of 2πr and return to the clock S at different times, as seen by S.

↑ This wrong paper doubting synchronization of clocks ↓

p.8-(19)(20) used artificial imaginary relations that do Not exist even in general relativity.

p.12-(45)~(49)~p.14-(51) wrongly says the rotating clock S unrealistically ticks differently when measuring two lights traveling in different directions (= as if the same clock S exists in two different parallel universes ), and unfoundedly doubts synchronization.

Only one detector S rotating with a loop is needed to measure lights traveling faster or slower than c and returning to the same detector S, which single clock's measurement is perfect synchronization, contrary to the above wrong paper's claim..

General relativity paradoxically admits the faster-than-light in rotating detectors, which contradicts Einstein relativity.

(Fig.6)  General relativistic fictional Coriolis time dilation conveniently changed by the object's moving direction allows the paradoxical faster than light, causing unreal imaginary relativistic mass.  → Einstein is false.

General relativity cannot explain Sagnac effect.

The original general relativistic time dilation related only to the rotating radius r cannot explain light speed difference in different directions in Sagnac effect.

The observer S rotating at a velocity v = rω (= r is the loop's radius, ω is the loop's angular velocity ) measures light traveling faster or slower than light depending on the light's traveling direction, which disproves Einstein relativity claiming the observed light speed must be always the constant c regardless of any moving observers.

General relativistic ( gravitational or acceleration ) time dilation depends on (pseudo-)gravitational potential φ causing clocks in different positions r or h (= r is distance from the star or rotating center ) with different (pseudo-)gravitational potential to tick at different speeds ( this-p.15 ).

↑ General relativistic time dilation should depend only on positions r or h, Not on velocities of particles, which basic Einstein relativistic rule is violated in this illegitimate general relativistic interpretation of the faster-than-light Sagnac effect.

The ordinary general relativistic time dilation can Not be applied to the rotating loop where all clocks along the rotating loop tick at the same pace symmetrically (= which synchronization can be easily monitored and confirmed by the outside stationary clocks ) with the same (centrifugal) potential that is the same in all places of the same radius r ( this-p.17-5.9 ).

↑ So there should be No general relativistic time dilation in the rotating frame (= as seen by the rotating observer S ) in positions along the loop with the same r from the center ( this-middle ), and only special relativistic irreparable time dilation paradox of moving clocks running slower remains, which disproves Einstein relativity.

General relativity paradoxically admits faster-than-light.

Ad-hoc general relativistic solution to Sagnac effect relies on pseudo-Coriolis force time dilation that paradoxically allows light to travel faster or slower than light depending on the light traveling direction even in the same position.

So general relativity paradoxically admits the faster or slower-than-light speeds by introducing the ad-hoc new concept called "Coriolis pseudo-gravitational potential" that paradoxically speeds up or slows down the light speed depending on the light's traveling direction even in the same light's positions r ( this-p.4-5 ), which contradicts the original general relativistic time dilation that depends only on positions, Not on the light's traveling direction.

This paper ↓

p.1-right-says "there are still different interpretations of Sagnac experiment in the framework of the GTR (= general theory of relativity )."  ← still No right solution to Sagnac effect even in general relativity.

p.3-right-(32)(33) says "Equivalently we can say that there is a “gravitational” potential... which generates the the Coriolis tidal force "

p.4-left-(34)(35) falsely insists lights traveling in the opposite directions (= ±v = ±c ) experience different time dilations (= one light is faster, the other light is slower, = dτ₁ and dτ₂ ) even in the same place along the loop.

p.4-6 conclusion says "it seems that the speed of light varies by c ± ωr (= faster or slower than light speed c ) in one or the other direction around the disk.... by using the gravitational Coriolis time dilation"

There is No such thing as Coriolis force potential.

So general relativistic solution to faster-than-light Sagnac effect is wrong, unreal.

↑ First of all, there is No such thing as Coriolis potential, because Coriolis force is always perpendicular to the thing's moving direction, which can Not generate potential energy (= potential energy equals force × thing's moving distance in the same non-perpendicular direction,  this-last-paragraph ), as seen in the fact that there is No potential of Lorentz magnetic force exerted on particles moving in the direction perpendicular to magnetic field.

Objects faster than light have unreal imaginary mass.

General (and special ) relativity is wrong, allowing unreal imaginary relativistic mass or energy of light observed to travel faster than light.

As a result, the general relativistic Sagnac effect allows the rotating observer S to measure light traveling faster (or slower ) than light, whose relativistic mass or energy (and time ) must be unreal imaginary, which clearly contradicts not only Einstein relativity but also reality.

↑ And this general relativistic solution to Sagnac effect paradoxically admits the absolute light aether stationary with respect to the earth ( this-p.1-right-lower~p.2-left ).

Faster-than-light Sagnac effect disproves special relativity.

Faster than light Sagnac effect can be observed also in non-rotational system (= special relativity case ) when the rotating loop's radius r is very large, so relying on ad-hoc general relativity is nonsense.

Also in cases where the radius of the loop is very large r → ∞ and angular velocity ω → 0 to keep the same loop or S rotating speed rω, which corresponds to the linear motion of special relativity, the linearly-moving S still can measure light traveling faster or slower than light, disproving Einstein relativity ( this-middle~lower ).

↑ The difference in times (= Δt = 4πr²ω/c² ) required for light-1 anticlockwise and light-2 clockwise to return to the rotating S (= or S is linearly moving when r → ∞ ) becomes infinite (= Not zero, so two lights-1 and 2 travel at different speeds of faster or slower than light speed c ) also in case of special relativity of r → ∞, ω → 0, rω = constant ( this-p.2-(6) or p.3-(20) = Δt = 4πr²ω/c² → ∞ ).

↑ So Sagnac effect paradoxically allowing faster or slower than light speed corresponds also to linear motion or inertial frame, Not limited only to the rotating system or observers, hence, the claim that only general relativity can explain Sagnac effect (after special relativity failed to explain the observed faster than light Sagnac effect ) is false.

Einstein relativity disagrees with experiments.

General relativity cannot explain why the light speed is affected only by the earth's spinning, Not by the earth's rotating around the Sun.

Furthermore, light emitted from GPS satellite is observed to travel faster or slower than light only when seen by the earth spinning, Not by the earth rotating around Sun nor galactic center (= as shown in Michelson- Morley experiment measuring the constant light speed in any directions ), which contradicts this general relativistic interpretation of Sagnac effect applied to any rotating systems that cannot distinguish the earth spinning and the earth rotating around the Sun.

The only legitimate explanation agreeing with the observed Sagnac effect without any contradictions is the light medium unfixed to the earth spinning (= detecting Sagnac effect where light speed is changed by the earth's spinning ) moving with the earth (= compatible with Michelson-Morley experiment and aberration ).

Sagnac effect in optical fiber medium disproves relativistic interpretation of Fizeau experiment.

(Fig.7)  Relativity claims the light speed with respect to the stationary medium (= rotating with S ) must be always c/n (= n is refractive index of the medium ), which is wrong.

Light medium can explain Sagnac effect in optical fibers.

Sagnac effect using optical fiber medium is also compatible with the light medium with the Fizeau's partial aether drag that disproves Einstein relativity.

In Sagnac effect using optical fiber with refractive index n, the light speed is heavily influenced by the light medium in the fiber, which also confirms the light medium (= aether ) moving with the earth.

Fizeau experiment showed the light speed c is slowed down to c/n (= n is water's refractive index ) in water medium, and the light is partially dragged by the moving water medium.

↑ Einstein relativity or its Lorentz transformation can Not explain why the light speed c is suddenly slowed down to c/n inside the water medium, so false.

As shown in Fig.7, the difference in time needed for light-1 (= traveling anticlockwise ) and light-2 (= traveling clockwise ) to reach the S rotating clockwise at a velocity of v = rω (= r is radius of the circular path, ω is the angular velocity of the path ) is almost independent of the refractive index n ( this p.6,  this-last ), which can be explained by the real medium theory partially dragging light of Fizeau ( this p.13-lower,  this p.2 ).

↑ Transparent medium (= molecules ) such as optical fiber and water allows almost all the earth's light medium (= aether ) to pass through it, and partially affects the light speed.

Einstein relativity is wrong, contradicts Fizeau.

The detector S rotating with the optical fiber medium sees light speeds different from c/n, which contradicts relativistic interpretation of Fizeau experiment.

The fact that two lights reaching the rotating S inside the rotating optical fiber medium at different times means the light speed is Not uniform in the rest frame of the (optical fiber) medium which contradicts the relativistic interpretation of Fizeau experiment where light speed must be always the same c/n in the rest frame of the medium whose refractive index is n ( this p.16-upper,  this p.6-(25)(26) ).

Disproving Einstein relativity rejecting the medium means disproving quantum mechanics based on unphysical wave-particle duality or parallel universes.

Feel free to link to this site.