Home page
Einstein is wrong
relativistic force paradox
(Fig.1) A moving particle with heavier relativistic mass or larger kinetic energy emitting light energy looks like a stationary particle with No energy to lose, when seen by an observer K' moving with the particle, which is paradox.
Einstein relativity claims a moving particle's mass and energy becomes larger, which is called relativistic mass and relativistic energy mc2.
But in this Einstein relativistic theory with No absolute frame (= which particle is moving depends on observers ), the moving particle which has kinetic energy enough to emit light appears to be a stationary particle with No kinetic energy to lose as emitted light, when seen by an observer K' moving with the particle.
↑ This is clearly paradox disproving Einstein relativity.
Because the stationary observer K sees a moving particle with larger energy losing its energy by emitting light.
The observer K' moving at the same speed as the particle sees the particle (= the same particle seen by K ) at rest with No energy to lose, but K' paradoxically sees that particle at rest (= with No kinetic energy to lose ) losing energy by emitting light energy (= because the fact that the particle emits light energy is unchanged, whether seen by different obervers K or K' ).
This relativistic mass-energy contradicts Sagnac effect of faster-than-light motion where relativistic mass of the particle's velocity v being faster-than-light becomes the unreal imaginary mass.
(Fig.2) Mass defect is caused by decreased potential energy in the medium around particles, disproving Einstein relativity.
The important point is that the relativistic energy or relativistic mass in nuclear binding energy has nothing to do with Einstein relativistic mass-energy which is paradoxically decreased or increased by observers' motion.
In nuclear biding energy or mass defect, the total relativistic mass is paradoxically smaller than the rest masses of particles with No kinetic energy to lose by the potential energy change ( this-1st-paragraph, this-p.1-lower~p.3 ).
↑ Einstein relativity without the medium can never explain this nuclear binding energy (= or Coulomb energy ), because the constant rest masses of particles can never disappear (= mass defect ) to somewhere else..
This nuclear binding energy (= potential energy like Coulomb energy ) or mass defect needs the real medium where the potential (= binding ) energy ( this-1st-paragraph ) stored around the particles becomes lower by particles binding to each other in nuclear or Coulomb force.
Mass defect in nuclear energy or forming hydrogen (= H ) atom ( Fig.2-lower ) shows the vacuum around the stationary particle already contains some real medium as potential energy (= instead of unphysical virtual particles with imaginary mass contradicting relativistic mass ).
↑ When a stationary electron and a proton (= having only rest mass energy m0c2 ) attracting each other forms a H atom, the relativistic mass-energy of the electron and proton increases due to their increased kinetic energy or velocities (from the initial zero velocity of the stationary separated electron and nucleus ) according to Virial theorem.
↑ But the total relativistic energy (= E ) or mass (= M ) of a H atom decreases (= causing mass defect of - ΔM ) due to the decreased potential energy (= -V ) despite paradoxically increasing relativistic kinetic energy or mass of the electrons and protons in the bound H atom.
This-p.4 says
"The relativistic energy of an electron in a hydrogen atom becomes smaller
than the rest mass energy"
"The behavior of an electron inside an atom, where there is potential energy,
cannot be described with the relationship of Einstein Equation"
"According to the STR (= special theory of relativity ), the electron’s mass increases when its velocity increases. However, inside the hydrogen atom, the mass of the electron decreases when the velocity of the electron increases"
The only explanation is that the relativistic mass-energy mc2 is the potential energy stored in the medium around an electron and a proton, which decreases when an electron and a proton approach each other to form a H atom by emitting light energy.
↑ If the space around electrons and protons contains nothing nor No medium (= Einstein relativity rejecting the medium ), this mass decrease in nuclear or atomic formation can Not be explained.
So the relativistic mass-energy mc2 disproves Einstein relativity denying the medium.
When two electrons at rest are made closer to each other (and these two electrons remain at rest after getting closer ), the total energy and mass increases due to higher Coulomb potential energy ( this-p.1-middle, this-middle-stored energy ). ← If the space around electrons contains No energy nor mass (= No medium ), this mass-energy increase by higher potential energy cannot be explained, which fact disproves Einstein relativity.
Actually, the relativistic mass-energy mc2 was first introduced by classical Maxwell electromagnetic theory based on the realistic mc2 or the light medium.
In fact, the relativistic energy and mass is just a copy of classical Maxwell electromagnetic theory with mc2 energy stored in the medium, which is Not Einstein's original idea ( this p.3-right-3rd-paragraph ).
So the nuclear potential energy and kinetic energy (= de Broglie wave energy ) are stored in the medium surrounding the particle, which can avoid Einstein relativistic paradoxes (= when the particle is moving with respect to the medium, which causes kinetic energy and de Broglie wave irrelevant to observers ).
A particle moving faster experiences larger resistance from the surrounding medium that is detected as a larger (illusory relativistic) mass. ← Electromagnetic force transmitted through the medium at light speed c cannot accelerate the particle faster than light, which has nothing to do with the paradoxical Einstein relativity.
(Fig.3) As the relativistic mass of a faster particle is bigger, gravity acting on the particle is bigger (= gravity = relativistic mass × gravitational acceleration g ), which paradoxically allows faster-than-light acceleration, disproving Einstein.
According to general relativistic equivalence principle, gravitational mass is equal to the inertial mass (= relativistic mass, this p.1-introduction-1st-paragraph, this-p.5-2nd-paragraph ).
↑ It means a particle accelerated by gravity increases its relativistic mass, which increases the gravitational force (= relativistic mass × gravitational acceleration g ).
So the gravitational force increasing proportional to the relativistic mass can accelerate the particle with large relativistic mass infinitely faster, even faster than light.
In Fig.3, an observer accelerating at the acceleration g sees the particle moving at almost light speed c with very larger relativistic mass (= 10000 × rest mass m0 ) and the stationary particle with rest mass m0 appearing to be accelerated in the opposite direction by fictitious gravitational force.
According to Einstein equivalence principle, this fictitious acceleration seen by the accelerating observer is equal to gravitational force.
So gravitational force is equal to the relativistic mass × gravitational acceleration g, which can accelerate even the particle with very large relativistic mass at the constant acceleration g, which eventually exceeds the light speed c, contradicting Einstein relativistic postulate of maximum light speed c.
Actually, Schwartzschild solution of black hole says the velocity of free-falling object can exceed light speed c inside event horizon of a black hole ( this-1st-paragraph ), seen by the free-falling object (= using this object's proper time, this p.7 shows free-falling object's velocity exceeds light speed, in r → 0, this p.20 ).
↑ Objects falling to the event horizon reaches the light speed c, hence, the objects falling to the inside of event horizon could be accelerated to the speed of faster-than-light, which contradicts Einstein relativity prohibiting faster than light
↑ It means escaping from black hole needs faster than light ( this-1st-paragraph, = objects falling to the inside of black hole are accelerated faster than light by black hole gravitational potential energy )
Relativistic mass is known to cause unsolvable paradoxes such as force or right-angle lever, so Einstein relativity is false.
As the result, all (unphysical) quantum field theory, QED, standard model based on contradictory virtual particles with imaginary mass (= disobeying Einstein relativistic mass-energy relation ) are useless, proved to be wrong.
Feel free to link to this site.
