Useless quantum experiment.


Einstein test (← ? ) is meaningless.

[ Einstein relativity tests deal with fiction Not related to our daily life. ]

(Fig.1)  ↓ The earth = Einstein elevator falling into the Sun ? = fantasy.

This paper claims expanding universe, Big Bang is the test of Einstein reltivity.  But this is lie, because Einstein disbelieved Big Bang.

Expanding universe is meaningless and fantasy.  They claim the earth and sun are Not expanding despite the expanding universe, which is contradictory.

This research is nonsense.  They claim the earth is free-falling into the Sun as Einstein elevator (← ? ) and it may slightly affect clock time ?

But the earth is Not falling, and Einstein general relativitic effect is too small compared to atmospheric effect.  So we cannot measure it.

Too small Einstein relativistic effect is doubtful and meaningless for our daily lives,  and Einstein general relativity contradicts special relativity.


Quantum mechanics isn't real.

[ Quantum mechanics uses unreal quasiparticle. ]

(Fig.2)  ↓ Atomic classical vibration = quantum phonon = unreal !

Quantum mechanis has given up clarifying true microscopic mechanism.

Quantum mechanics just fabricates fictitious unreal quasiparticle with fake mass and charge  to explain experimental results, so useless.

They try to explain atomic classical vibration using quasiparticle = phonon, which is Not an actual particle,  but just nonphysical symbol.

This research also tries to explain magnetic metal using unreal monopole quasiparticle ( this abstract ).

So quantum mechanics relying on unreal quasiparticles are useless, forever.


Unreal quantum mechanics.

[ Light matter interaction = unreal quasiparticle ? ]

(Fig.3)  ↓ Polariton, plasmon are unreal quasiparticles.

Quantum mechanics is useless theory.
They try to describe physical phenomena using fictitious quasiparticle.

This and this try to express light-matter interaction by unreal quasiparticle polariton and plasmon ( this and this abstract ).

Qantum mechanics using fake quasiparticle is impractical, forever.


Insulator by unreal quasiparticle ?

[ Dirac fermion is unreal quasiparticle. ]

(Fig.4)  ↓ Electric conductance → unreal quasiparticle ?  

This research tries to explain some special electric conductance by unreal Dirac quasiparticle ( this p.4 left ).

Fake particle = quasiparticle is based on unphysical definition.


Large Hadron collider is waste of money.

[ Higgs has nothing to do with "mass" ! ]

(Fig.5)  Why Higgs field around us cannot be detected ?

If Higgs is giving mass to all particles, there must be infinite Higgs around us.  But we cannot detect Higgs outside Large Hadron collider (= LHC ).

In fact, Higgs boson discovered (← ? ) inside LHC collider has nothing to do with "mass".  Higgs field gives mass.  See this.

So even if they found Higgs boson at LHC, it's completely meaningless.  Higgs inside LHC lacks reality, too.

LHC is a waste of money.  Physicists just claim they might found new particle, which is too unstable and cannot be isolated from LHC to confirm.


Neutrino and anti-neutrino cannot be discriminated.

[ Anti-neutrino is based on "artificial" and "imaginary" model. ]

(Fig.6)  Proton's crash into carbon atom produces (anti-) muon-neutrino ?

The present neutrino experiment is meaningless.

How can they produce neutrino ?  The point is we cannot directly discriminate between neutrino and anti-neutrino.  They have to rely on some "artificial" model.

In T2K, physicists accelerate protons to almost light speed and crash them into carbon graphite, and discriminate positive and negative ions under magnetic field.

They claim only a small part of them includes unstable pions. Positive pions (= π+ ) decays into muon and neutrino, and negative pion decays into anti-neutrino.

This is just a speculation, because we cannot see "ghost-like" neutrino itself and cannot discriminate neutrino and antineutrino directly.



2018/6/8 updated. Feel free to link to this site.