(Fig.1) We can control and move the tip very small distance ( < 0.1 Å ) !
In atomic force microscopy, we can observe and manipulate each single atom, using actuator .
It means we already have the technology of moving the tip of microscope very small distance ( < 0.1 Å ) to distinguish a single atom.
But under the useless quantum mechanics, we cannot move forward to the next step of making artificial molecules by controling each atom !
(Fig.2) ↓ A single probe detect only nonspecific (= meaningless ) force.
Though we have already had the technology of manipulating a single atom, our basic science stops.
All the current atomic force microscopes have only a single probe tip, which cannot identify a target atom !
Even when the microscope tries to measure the atomic force with its single probe from above, it cannot distinguish between force1 and force2 in Fig.2.
If you use two probe tips and put the target atom between them, you can measure the atomic size and identify them !
(Fig.3) ↓ With only one probe, the target molecule is unstable.
Atomic force microscope with a single probe tip can detect only the structures of "flat" molecules. It cannot detect 3-dimensional atomic structure !
If you try to press the microscope probe tip onto some atom of the target molecule, it easily inclines to one side, and too unstable to know the molecule structure.
If you use two probes, you can solve this problem.
While one probe tip is pressing down on and immobilize the target molecule, another tip can measure the exact atmic 3-D position !
In conclusion, at least two probes is necessary in atomic force microscope to identify and manipulate the target atom and molecule.
But useless quantum mechanics prevents us from noticing this important fact !
(Fig.4) ↓ A single probe cannot feel true "force" specific to each atom
All the present atomic force microscopes have only one single probe tip, which can detect only "relative" force to identify each atom.
When you press the tip of probe on some target atom. the force it can detect is not the true force specific to each atom.
The single probe can detect the force2 in Fig.4 between the whole molecule and the ground under it.
To know the true atomic force and radius specific to each atom, we need at least two probes, and put each atom between those probes !
Using two probe tips, not only identifying but also picking up each atom are possible !
(Fig.5) They try to explain "meaningless force" by useless quantum model.
The problem is the current physicists don't notice that what they are doing is meaningless under vague quantum mechanical model.
Detected force using only a single microscope probe includes just "nonspecific, meaningless information".
Despite the fact, physicists try to explain these meaningless data using useless quantum mechanical methods.
Quantum mechanics just chooses fake potential and fake solution out of infinite choices, which gives them false impression that they can explain it !
They don't notice that what they should do is measure the precise atomic force using realistic model and it needs at least two microscope probes.
(Fig.6) They just choose "fake solution" from infinite choices ← useless !
After detecting the slight force of a single atoms or molecule, we need to interpret those forces using some atomic model.
Unless we can explain each single atomic force, we cannot move forward to the next step of utilizing multi-atomic bahavior.
The problem is that there is the only useless quantum mechnaics (= Schrödinger equation ) as a tool to interpret these atomic data, now.
Quantum mechanics have NO exact solution in multi-electron atoms, so they just choose fake solution from infinite choices, meaning no power to predict anyhing.
In atomic force microspopy, they use densisty functional theory (= DFT ), which is a further approximation of quantum mechanics, so more incorrect and useless.
(Fig.7) DFT is one of "false" approximations of Schrödinger equation.
In atomic force microcopy, the only tool is useless density functional theory (= DFT ). All papers rely on this DFT ( this , this ).
Density functional theory (= DFT ) is one of approximate Schrödinger equations. DFT replaces electron-electron interaction by fake artificial potential.
In Schrödinger equation, they just choose fake approximate solutions as "trial wavefunction". In DFT, they have to choose "fake artificial potential", too.
There are NO restrictions in choosing these fake potentials. We can choose any forms of these potentials from infinite choices in DFT.
So DFT has NO ability to predict any atomic behavior. In spite of this, this DFT is the only tool for analysing atomic force microcsopy !
No matter how many times they catch slight atomic force, all they can use is useless density functional theory (= DFT, see this p.6 ).
All in these single molecule detections, useless density functional theory is the only method to interpret each atomic force ( see abstract of this and this ).
This is where out science stops. Physicists are shackled to old useless methods which don't admit "concrete force". It just gives us weird wavefunctions as a tool.
(Fig.8) So DFT cannot predict any atomic behavior, useless.
Density functional theory (= DFT ) forcedly changes muti-electron equation into one-electron approximation.
In one-electron DFT method, we need to artificially pick up "fake" forms of electrons' interaction potential called exchange correlation functional.
Selecting convenient functional for your purpose is all you have to do in DFT ( this p.9 ). There is NO universal functional describing any potential ( this p.2 ).
When you pick up one of functional ( ex. LDA ) from infinite choices and it fails, you can pick up other functionals as fake electrons' potential.
Selecting fake potential and fake solutions as you like means this DFT method has NO ability to predict any atomic behavior, so useless, too
2017/4/21 updated. Feel free to link to this site.
