(Fig.1) Their science is useless for our daily life forever.
Particle colliders such as LHC are just useless " trash". Because they just waste our tax, contributing nothing to our daily life.
Though the media like to use boring cliche such as "revolutionary new particle" and "rewrite laws of physics", it's meaningless for us.
What they call, the new physics is an "artificial and fake" physics which has nothing to do with our real world.
(Fig.2) 750 GeV new particle at LHC is unreal and meaningless.
New particle with the mass of 750 GeV found at LHC last year is fake and unreal. In fact, these new particles are meaningless from the beginning.
What can we call "new particle" ? For example, electrons and protons forming atoms are real particles without doubt.
Doubtful particles such as Higgs inside colliders can be called "real particle", though they are too unstable to detect directly ?
(Fig.3) Electrons, protons forming atoms are stable and real !
Electrons and protons form atoms and molecules. These particles actually exist. Because they are stable enough to form atoms and influence our daily lives.
Influencing our daily life means we can put them to pracical use.
This is what a real particle is.
(Fig.4) Real electrons and protons are useful for our daily life.
As you know, electrons and protons are abundant and stable enough to influence our daily life and universe.
Influencing our universe means we can put electrons and protons to practical use, as useful (= real ) particles.
(Fig.5) Only one in every trillion collisions produces a Higgs ? ← too rare !
Different from stable electrons and protons, Higgs boson is too unstable to detect directly ( its lifetime is only 10– 22 s ). So Higgs is completely a useless particle.
All they can detect is final products such as "two lights" (= NOT Higgs itself ). Only one in every trillion collisions inside LHC may produce Higgs, they say.
It is very hard to call Higgs a real particle, while it's too unstable and too rare.
(Fig.6) Higgs is meangingless for our daily life = unreal particle.
Higgs is too unstable to detect directly, it decays instantly into other things. So this unstable Higgs boson has NO influence our daily life ( and universe ).
Even if we consider Higgs doesn't really exist, it wouldn't affect our daily life at all. So we can say Higgs is unreal and its research is just a waste of money.
(Fig.7) It just wastes money in gigantic particle collider.
Higgs boson is too unstable and too rare to affect our universe. It means all researches on Higgs and particle colliders are a waste of money.
In fact, Higgs boson has nothing to do with "giving mass".
(Fig.8) Only one in 20 trillions of proton collisions produces a new particle ?
Last year, Cern announced that new particle with a mass of 750 GeV might be found inside LHC. This particle is also too unstable to detect directly.
They just detect two photons (= classical light ), and called those lights "new particle" by force. ← far-fetched interpretation !
This new particle is also too rare, only one in every 20 trillions of proton collisions might produce this new particle. This is a completely useless thing.
(Fig.9) New particle decaying instantly has NO meaning for our life.
Like Higgs, this new 750 GeV particle inside LHC decays into other things (= classical light ) instantly, they say.
So this new particle has NO influence on our daily lives, and we can completely neglect all these unstable particles as "unreal".
(Fig.10) ↓ Only stable electrons are real particles, unstable muon, tau are NOT.
The current model claims that leptons include three particles, electrons, muon and tau. But this theory is nonsense and describes NO realistic world.
Only electrons are stable and useful. Other elementary particles are too unstable, instantly decaying into other things, so meaningless for us.
It is safe to say these too unstable muon and tau are NOT real particles but just a "artifact" seen inside many scattered real particles.
(Fig.11) Higgs, quarks are too unstable to be useful, so "unreal" particles
What is the definition of "real" particle ? If some particles are too unstable to affect our universe, we can neglect them as "unreal".
"Too unstable" means these particles are useless for us ( forever ), so any researches on these useless, doubtful particles are just a waste of our tax.
(Fig.12) Only electron, proton, light, neutrino are real
You may often see the table of elementary particles.
Unfortunately, almost all these particles are unreal and useless, forever.
Fractional-charge quark can never be isolated.
Higgs, weak bosons are too unstable and rare to observe directy.
Muon and other unstable particles instantly decay into electrons and light.
So only electron, proton, neutrino, light are real and meaningful.
Don't be misled by false colorful pictures of imaginary particles
(Fig.13) Einstein mc2 →unreal quantum theory and Higgs.
Elusive Higgs discovered (← ? ) at LHC is based on Einstein mc2.
In fact, this famous Einstein mc2 includes fatal paradox, so false.
The important point is that this quantum field theory has NO ability to describe "concrete" particle figures.
Under this very limited and useless physics, there is nothing physicists can do. So they needed to fabricate some "imaginary" target such as symmetry.
To keep this artificial rule of symmetry, Higgs and other unstable particles are needed. This "symmetry" is just an artificial target, nothing to do with the truth.
(Fig.14) Universities, Cern, Nobel should stop fictional science !
The current particle physics is a dead-end and useless.
Physicists are just aiming at getting Nobel prize or pulishing their papers in top journals.
Cern should stop promoting meaningless linear collider, which false science will end up misleading new students.
Without prizes and journals, the present particles physics is useless, just a waste of money.
2016/8/12 updated. Feel free to link to this site.