Basic science is fiction.

Top
Summary

Quantum mechnics relies on fictional particles with fake mass.

[ "Future quantum technology ?" means "No progress". ]

(Fig.1)  ↓ Fake "future" target = quantum ?   

This week physics  (11/27)    ← still No progress.

This week solid-physics is still full of unreal quasi-particle such as phonon ( this, this ), exciton ( this ), magnon ( this, this ), polaron ( this ).

Other unreal quasiparticles are skyrmion ( this ), anyon ( this ), Dirac fermion, Weyl fermion ( this ).

The 3rd paragraph of this news says "bimerons, similar to general antiferromagnetic (unreal) quasi-particles"
and its last paragraph just vaguely says
"The bimeron clusters can be efficiently manipulated by spin current, which makes them potential multi-bits data carriers ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future (= use of the vague word: potential )".  Still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "the electrons transform into peculiar ( unreal ) quasiparticles ... unprecedented properties are still a field of investigation full of questions ?"  ← still useless research, nothing is realized now.

The 4th paragraph of this news just vaguely says "material appears to be made from (unreal) "quasiparticles" with unusual properties ?"  ← This research is just "theory" based on unreal quasiparticle model, Not experiment, so meaningless.

The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "quantum algorithm with the potential to study a class of many-electron quantums syste"  ← just talking about "imaginary future (= use of vague word: potential )".  Nothing is realized now.
Unreal quasiparticle model is used in this research.

The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "proposed an algorithmic generator of the nonclassical state of light representing a Schrodinger's cat state ?"  ← Just proposal on a fictional dead and cat theory, Not experiment, so meaningless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "It could still take many years for these software developments to be implemented in fully-scalable quantum computers ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "a key requirement for future applications such as quantum-information processing and spintronics ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The 2nd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Calculations of this type have the potential to solve important problems in energy generation ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future (= use of vague word: potential )".  Nothing is realized now.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says " researchers are planning to combine the newly developed quantum dots with a rubidium quantum memory device. Such hybrid structures would be a first step towards practical applications in future quantum communication network ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Potential applications include high-precision metrology with manipulation of the quantum noise ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future (= use of vague word potential )".  Still useless research.

The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "they believe it will contribute to better understanding the events that transpired during the first few minutes after the (fantasy) Big Bang ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "We propose to turn a high-temperature superconductor into a time crystal by shining a laser on it, One of these excitations is the elusive Higgs mode ?"  ← Just proposal of fictional theory ( based on pseudo-Higgs in condensed matter ), Not experiment, so meaningless research.

The 4th last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "One potential application for these molecules could be quantum sensors ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future (= use of vague word; potential )".  Still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "In the long term, attosecond electron microscopy may help to uncover the atomistic origins ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The strong interaction keeps surprising us .. and will surely do it again in the future ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

 

to

2020/11/27 updated. Feel free to link to this site.