Meron = unreal particle ?

Top
Summary

Quantum mechanics relies on unreal particles.

[ Phonon, skyrmion, meron are unreal quasiparticles. ]

(Fig.1)  ↓ Unreal quantum mechanics is useless.  

Quantum mechanics is too old and useless, so it relies on unreal quasiparticles with fake mass to explain all experimental data.

Skyrmion and meron (= half-skyrmion ) are just fictitious quasiparticles to express some magnetic vortex pattern in material, which is useless.

The last of this news uses vague phrases; "This could have implications for future spintronic device ?"  ← still nothing realized.

This research tries to explain interaction between crystal and light using unreal quasiparticles phonon and virtual photons, which are nonphysical math symbols ( this p.4  this p.9 ).

The last of this news just says "The force of the vacuum will help us in this quest ?"  ← still useless, nothing realized.

This also uses unreal quasiparticle, plasmon.

The last of this news says "paving the way for futher studies ..?"  ← still useless, nothing realized.

In this way, quantum mechanics relying on unreal quasiparticles is useless, forever.

 

Moore's law ends ?

[ Academia, corporations deceive governments by fake computer ? ]

(Fig.2)  ↓ Get money using fake future computer ?   

The current basic physics stalls, so academia and corporations need to make up imaginary target = AI, parallel world quantum computer to get subsidy.

This paper by Intel and university uses vague phrases; "A new type of memory could someday ?" or "may replace ?"  ← still nothing realized, just proposal.

The current condensed matter physics relies on fictitious electron with fake effective mass (= m* ) and spin-orbit adjusted by artificial parameters, so meaningless ( this p.4 ).

This paper by IBM is just theory, Not experiment.  The last of this news just says "Quantum computer is the next frontier that will change the world ?"  ← still nothing realized.

This research just says "PCM (= new memory ? ) has the potential, but the applications have lingered .. "  ← still useless, nothing realized.

In this way, almost all quantum mechanical papers are useless, except to get taxpayers' money using imaginary future computer.

 

Black hole collision is impossible.

[ Gravitational wave is too weak, doubtful, useless. ]

(Fig.3)  ↓ Black hole, gravitational wave are just imagination.

Black hole and gravitational wave are still useless , just waste taxpayers' money.  They are just fictional science used only by academia, the media, and bloggers.

This research claims that more black hole collisions emitting gravitational wave were detected ?  ← Einstein right ?,  No, wrong.

First, black hole collision is impossible, because the time on black hole stops seen from outside observers (= earth ).  So black holes must move at infinite speed (← impossible ! ) to collide.

Gravitational wave is called "pseudo(= fake )tensor", because it contradicts Einstein general relativity, so if gravitational wave is true, Einstein theory is wrong.

Different from the media's "giant black hole !", gravitatinal wave is too small to believe.  It changes 4km arm by only 1/1000 the width of proton ( this p.2 ).

Electrons and protons at detector mirrors are always moving, causing far larger errors.  Though they claim heavy stable mirror can reduce this error ! it's impossible without artificial model ( this p.14 ).

This latest gravitatinal wave is smaller (= more doubtful ) than this first wave (= GW150914, see this p.21 )

 

GPS time correction includes 'twin paradox', so wrong !

[ We cannot know which clock of two moving satellites runs slower ! ]

(Fig.4)  Moving clock runs slower → Twin paradox ! → GPS wrong !

"GPS uses Einstein relativity ?" is wrong.
Because Einstein special relativity includes twin paradox.

They argue a satellite clock ticks faster ( only 38 μs per day ← too small to believe ! ), combining time dilation and general relativity.  See this this.  But this far-fetched interpretation is wrong !

According to special relativity, moving clock ticks more slowly.
In Fig.4, two satellites are moving around the earth at the same speed "v" in the opposite directions.

The distances between the earth and both these satellites are always the same "r".
From the viewpoint of "A" satellite (← rest frame ), "B" satellite is moving, so "B" clock runs slower.

But from the viewpoint of "B" satellite, "A" satellite is moving, so "A" clock runs slower !
This is "famous" twin paradox.  GPS time correction includes fatal paradox, so wrong !

Rough relativistic time correctioon is done before satellite launch.
After that. each time some time error occurs, we can correct it without relying on Einstein theory.

Einstein special relativity says the time is relative (= Not absolute ), so it must change depending on observer's movement, which explanation contradicts actual relativistic time correction (= constant value seen from any oberservers ).

This time correction in elliptical satellite orbit depends on artificial model and parameters to correct uncertain time errors (= caused by temperature, Sun .. this p.30, this p.37, this p.5= ad hoc parameter )

-------------------------

Moving clock ticks slower, which is related to "velocity squared".

Other factors with the same unit affecting time are gravitional and centrifugal potentials, both of which change with the orbital radius r.  In this case, this "r" is the same, No difference in two satellites.

In Fig.4 case, both satellites pass each other at the same position (= both satellites have the same potential ).

And both satellites' velocities are constant (= one is zero, another is 2v ) with the constant same potential.

It means there is No time dilation by "potential difference", each velocity is the only factor of time dilation.

This is real twin paradox where moving clock seen by another ticks slower, A(B) is slower than B(A) seen by B(A).

Einstein relativity is wrong.

 

to

2018/12/7 updated. Feel free to link to this site.