Current physics is unrealistic.

Top
Summary

Quantum mechanics using fake particles is useless, forever.

[ "Future quantum technology ?" means "No progress". ]

(Fig.1)  ↓ Fake "future" target = quantum ?   

This week physics  (2/12)    ← still No progress.

This week solid-physics is still full of unreal quasi-particle such as phonon ( this, this ), exciton ( this, this ), polariton ( this ), magnon ( this, this ), plasmon ( this ).

Other unreal quasiparticles are skyrmion ( this, this ), anyon ( this ), spinon ( this ), monople ( this ), Dirac fermion, Weyl fermion.

The 4th last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "This light switch enables Weyl points in the material, causing electrons to behave as massless particles (= unreal quasiparticle ) "
And its first paragraph just vaguely says "that holds great promise for spintronics ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The 8th paragraph of this news just vaguely says "A single electron by itself cannot carry half a charge or some other fractional amount. But, fragmented charges can show up within crystals (= unreal quasiparticle )"
And its last paragraph just vaguely says
"topological matter may increase our understanding of realistic materials ?"  ← Just speculation, still useless research.

The 2nd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "(unreal) quasiparticle known as a Majorana zero mode"
And its 6th last paragraph just vaguely says
"This signature will become the de-facto standard for detecting spin-gaps in the future ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.

The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "localized surface plasmon (= unreal quasiparticle ) resonance.. The precise mechanism for the intracellular delivery on TNT-based photoporation is still unclear. Intracellular delivery may happen .. ?"  ← Just speculation, still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "In the future, it would be interesting to see how topological spin textures could contribute to the transport in quantum magnets ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.
Unreal quasiparticle skyrmion is used in this research ( this last ).

The 8th paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Higgs mode (= unreal quasiparticle ) within a superconductor could potentially be used to develop new quantum sensors ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.

The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "opened up the possibility for attaining robust .. ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.
Unreal pseudo-spin is used in this research ( this p.2 left ).

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "In the future, we'd like to make our single-photon source even better ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.

The 2nd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "the findings could have major applications for digital storage devices ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.
A photon is just an unphysical math symbol in this research ( this p.2 left lower ).

The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "These insights will prove beneficial to future experiments on oxide/liquid interfaces ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Nothing is realized now.
Useless one-pseudo-electron DFT model is used in this research ( this p.5 right ).

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "moving the drones higher would allow for transmission over distances ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Let us hope that thermoelectric technology progresses rapidly ?"  ← Just "hope", still useless research.

The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "could lead to smaller, more energy-efficient electronic devices ?"  ← Just speculation, still useless research.

The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The next generation of big data-gathering satellites would be able to get critical information to the ground faster ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future".  Still useless research.

The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "If a star explodes and we don't see axions, then we'll get really stringent constraints on an axion's coupling to photons ?"  ← Just wasting time in imaginary distant objects.

The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The research could have applications in the fields of mathematical physics and string theory ?"  ← still useless research about unrealistic physics

 

to

2021/2/12 updated. Feel free to link to this site.