, GPS contradict relativity.
(Fig.M) Einstein relativity rejecting medium causing many paradoxes contradicts Sagnac effect where light speed c is changed by observer's motion (= earth rotation ).
Standard explanation says Michelson-Morley experiments measuring the constant light speed c in any directions on the earth denied the luminifeous aether (= light medium ), but this is untrue.
Michelson-Morley experiment did Not disprove the medium moving with the earth ( light travels through this earth medium at the constant light speed c in any directions like the constant sound wave's speed. ) ← This medium (= aether ) moving with the earth is compatible also with stellar aberration and Sagnac effect
Light speed c was originally derived by classical Maxwell electromagnetic theory based on light medium which influences light speed as shown in Fizeau, which is contrary to Einstein relativistic claim.
All experiments results such as light interference, diffraction, refraction, even photoelectric, Compton effects (= light wavelength instead of photon's speed is changed by collision ) show the light is wave traveling through the medium.
Einstein relativity rejecting the real medium (= aether ) for claiming the constant light speed c seen by any moving observers created the unphysical Lorentz transformation and time dilation, which causes many unsolvable paradoxes such as kinetic energy, de Broglie wave, electromagnetic, Ehrenfest, twin paradox.
Einstein relativity is useless, unnecessary, because GPS does Not need the paradoxical Einstein relativity (= many factors such as atmospheric pressure unrelated to Einstein relativity influence atomic clock time ), and PET uses just electron capture, Not the unphysical antiparticles.
No experimental evidence of Einstein relativity in (illusory) time dilation or Doppler effect. The relativistic spin-orbit effect using the contradictory faster-than-light spinning can be explained by non-relativistic factors (= just orbital motion with No unphysical spin ).
Unstable muons (= just other particles ) with higher energies (= faster speed ) can move longer, irrelevant to the (unphysical) Einstein time dilation allegedly elongating the faster muon's lifetime.
In fact, the light speed c is measured to be faster or slower than c by the earth rotation (= observer's motion ) in Michelson-Gale experiment, GPS, and Sagnac effects ( this p.1-lower~p.2 ), which disproves Einstein relativity based on the constant light speed c regardless of observer's motion ( this-abstract ).
So they started to say contradictory things that the earth rotation (= spinning ) is the rotating frame classified into general relativity which allows the light speed c changed by the rotating observers or earth, which disagrees with special relativity.
↑ But as shown in Michelson-Morley experiment, they paradoxically insist the light speed c is unchanged measured by the earth rotating around Sun, which is also rotating frame of general relativity, though.
↑ So this special and general relativity can Not give consistent reasons why the light speed c is changed only the earth spinning, Not by the earth rotating around Sun, nor velocity of GPS emitting light ( this p.18-19,p.31-32 ).
↑ When seen by observers moving with GPS satellites emitting light, the earth are moving in the opposite direction like the earth spinning, but the observed light speed is unchanged by the velocity of satellite emitting light, which contradicts the "relativistic" theory.
The only logical explanation is that the medium (= aether ) is moving with the earth (= through this earth medium, the light emitted by any moving satellites travels at the constant light speed c ), but the earth medium is unfixed to the earth rotation or spinning (= which can explain Sagnac effect of the light speed changed only by the earth spinning ) like the atmospheric molecules moving in various directions.
Relativistic mass or energy was just a copy of classical Maxwell theory based on light medium where faster things with higher energy (= larger mass according to Maxwell theory ) are harder to accelerate by electric field with the maximum light speed c.
Relativistic mass is wrong, causing right-angle lever paradox.
Today's quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) claims the electric and magnetic force is generated via (unreal) virtual photons with imaginary mass which contradicts Einstein relativistic mass-energy relation ( this p.3, this p.4-6 = called off mass shell ), expressed as unphysical Feynman diagram ( this p.9 ).
This unphysical QED cannot be the evidence of Einstein relativity, because QED calculations always give just meaningless infinities which must be artificially canceled to get some finite values by (unreal) infinite bare mass and charge ( this p.4 ) in renormalization.
↑ This ad-hoc unrealistic QED with No ability to predict any physical values ( this p.3-left-(5) ) due to the artificial cancellation of infinities was harshly criticized even by founders such as Dirac and Feynman as "hocus-pocus ( this-1st-paragraph )."
(Fig.Q) Einstein relativity rejecting the medium is paradoxical, wrong. → Electron's de Broglie wave is real. → Quantum mechanical unphysical wavefunction, parallel universes, relativistic spin-orbit effects are wrong, too.
As shown in fatal paradoxes such as twin, Lorentz-length, kinetic energy, de Broglie wave, electromagnetic, faster-than-light-Sagnac effect, contradictory gravitational wave, black hole, Einstein relativity is officially proven wrong.
The fact that Einstein relativity rejecting the medium is wrong means the electron's de Broglie wave is real wave generated in the real medium, which disproves quantum mechanical unphysical wavefunction, too.
Quantum mechanical ( paradoxical ) probability wavefunction is unrealistic, based on unscientific superposition where each electron must exist in all places at once in fantasy parallel universes until measured, also in two slit experiments of a single electron or a photon.
Furthermore, quantum mechanical electrons in s orbitals are said to have (unreal) zero orbital angular momentums, which means those electrons moving in linear orbits (= zero orbital angular momentum ) always crash into nuclei, and their de Broglie wave causes destructive interference, and become unstable.
↑ Einstein relativity rejecting the medium (= luminiferous ether ) is paradoxical and wrong, which means the electron is moving in the real medium, generating real de Broglie wave which replaces the unphysical quantum mechanical probability wavefunction based on parallel universes by real atomic (Bohr) model with No zero orbital angular momentum to avoid the destructive interference of de Broglie wave.
This real electron's de Broglie wave generated in the medium can naturally explain interference of a single electron in the two-slit experiments even without relying on the unrealistic quantum mechanical parallel universes.
Furthermore, instead of the unphysical quantum mechanical spin that is an unreal faster-than-light spinning and the unphysical exchange energy ( this p.8-lower ) lacking exchange force, this real electron's de Broglie wave (= destructive interference ) can naturally explain real Pauli exclusion principle.
Einstein relativity is proved to be wrong due to its fatal paradox.
So a small energy splitting called fine structure is caused Not by the (paradoxical) relativistic spin-orbit magnetic energy ( this p.6 ) in quantum mechanical Dirac hydrogen, but by real Bohr-Sommerfeld's fine structure without spin ( this-3rd-last-2nd-last-paragraphs, this p.14 ).
This realistic Bohr-Sommerfeld model relies on Maxwell's authentic mc2 energy (= classical Maxwell theory first proved the energy E stored in the medium has mass m equal to E/c2 ) that was copied as the paradoxical relativistic mass later by Einstein.
Einstein relativity is paradoxical and wrong, which means all relativistic quantum theories such as QED and standard model using paradoxical virtual particles with imaginary masses are wrong, too.
Actually, these unphysical QED and particle physics are completely useless, just wasting huge taxpayer's money in unnecessary gigantic colliders.
(Fig.P1) Different clock times in different positions.
Here we present a typical example of fatal paradox in Einstein relativity.
In Einstein relativity, a moving ovserver has an unrealistic power to bend even a rigid rod without touching it , no matter how hard the rod is, as seen in Lorentz contraction.
A rigid rod is moving upward at first and then turn to the left horizontally along the rigid square rail in the upper figure.
External forces are always applied to any positions of the long rod uniformly, in both leftward and upward directions (= at first, the rod cannot move to the left, blocked by the vertical rail on the right side. )
Surprisingly, as seen by a moving observer, this originally-straight rigid rod appears to be bent complexly, as seen in the upper figure right.
According to relativistic Lorentz transformation, events occurring in different positions (= x = 0, 1 ) at the same time (= t ) seen by stationary observer occur at the different times (= t' ) seen by a moving observer !
By inserting two positions x = 0 and 1 (= same time t by stationary observer ) into Lorentz tansformation, we find a moving observer sees the left end of rod turning to the left earlier than the right end of the rod.
Hence, a moving observer tends to see the future event of the left end of the rod and the past of the right end of the rod. which appears to bend the rod like in the upper figure right.
This occult world is Einstein special relativity.
(Fig.P2) "Block" changes the rod "future" direction.
So in Einstein fantasy relativistic world, a rigid rod "can" foresee the future !
In the upper figure, the right end of the rod (= still existing in the past ) has Not arrived at the turning point, but the left end of the rod (= existing in the future ) has already turned to the left at the turning point.
If someone suddenly puts a new block onto the turning point, the whole rigid rod (= including left and right ends of the rod ) cannot move leftward (= the whole rigid rod cannot turn to the left ), meaning the left end of the rod already turning leftward suddenly changes its past event and its direction (= as if moving upward from the beginning without turning to the left at the turning point ) without touching the rod !
This is paradoxical and impossible, because the right end of the rod (= past ) has Neither arrived at the turning point nor known whether a block is there or not.
But the left end of the rod can automatically predict the future event (= can know whether a new block is put at the turning point without touching it ), and make a decision whether it will bend (= moving leftward ) or bend back (= moving upward without turning leftward ) !
This is one of fatal paradoxes of Einstein relativity which theory proved to be wrong just by this paradox.
Here we suppose external force is always applied to any points of the rod uniformly, so the moment the rod arrives at the turning point without a block, the whole rod starts to turn to the left without delay simultaneously.
See Einstein is wrong in electromagnetic field.
See Einstein relativity de Broglie wave paradox
See Einstein relativity contradicts kinetic energy.
See Relativistic mass is unreal.
See Twin paradox is real, Einstein is wrong.
See GPS doesn't use relativity.
(Fig.U) Driving force to expand universe is dark energy ← NOT diluted ? Unreal negative pressure ?
Big Bang and expanding universe are just fantasy.
There is No evidence indicating our universe is expanding so rapidly, as seen in the fact that our solar system is Not expanding at all.
The current cosmology claims the entire universe is expanding by fictional dark energy with unreal negative pressure, which is said to be Not diluted even by the space expansion ( this 2nd-paragraph ). ← Dark energy is Not a real thing !
They baselessly conjecture that universe is expanding only from the fact that light emitted from more distant stars is redshifted (= longer wavelength ), which can be more naturally explained by lights from more distant stars tend to lose their energies, elongate their wavelength by being scattered by more dusts and or by oscillating other molecules while light is traveling an extremely long distance.
The most conclusive evidence of fantasy Big Bang is said to be an uniform cosmic microwave background (= CMB ) which is unrealistically misinterpreted as a remnant of the beginning of our universe.
But it's impossible for each microwave to keep an intact state of very ancient light wave from the early universe for as long time as 13.8 billion years !
So it is more natural to think that the uniform cosmic microwave filling all space is an evidence of uniform light "medium (= slightly oscillating at 3 K )" filling space.
The current astronomy focuses only on fictional science saying this cosmic microwave may indicate fantasy parallel universes. ← nonsense.
Astronomers often cite "Olber's paradox (= why night sky is dark )" as a reason for the (fictional) expanding universe or BigBang, but this Olber's paradox does Not justify the expanding universe at all.
According to Olber's paradox, if the universe is static and infinite filled with luminous objects (= stars ), every sight line from the Earth will eventually intersect a bright object, it means the night sky will be bright, hence, the universe should be finite and expanding (= BigBang ) to solve this paradox and make the night sky dark.
And they misleadingly claim that even if dusts or debris in the space could absorb the light, they heat up and eventually reradiate the same light towards the Earth (← this is wrong ), hence the existence of dusts doesn't solve this Olber's paradox ( this resolution ).
↑ But this logic of expanding universe intentionally avoids the case where many dusts and objects in the space block and reflect the light back to the stars, as seen in the solar eclipse ( this 5th-paragraph ).
In conclusion, Olber's paradox is caused by forgetting the case of light reflection, and the expanding universe and BigBang are false.
See Gravitational wave is unreal
Feel free to link to this site.
.PNG){kind=link}
