Home page
Einstein relativity is false
(Fig.1) Light emitted from the higher position is blue-shifted with higher frequency due to light gaining gravitational potential energy irrelevant to Einstein time dilation.
Contrary to an incredible amount of overhyped misleading news, there is No evidence of Einstein relativistic time dilation (= too small to measure reliably, this-p.2-3,p.6-conclusion ), as seen in GPS not using relativity that causes serious twin and Sagnac effect (= faster-than-light ) paradox.
The claim that gravitational redshift is due to Einstein time dilation is also wrong.
In gravitational redshift experiments conducted by Pound-Rebka in Harvard tower, the light emitted from 22m higher position was accelerated and gained gravitational potential energy (= gL, g is gravitational acceleration, L = height 22m ), which was detected with higher frequency (= blueshifted ) by the detector on the ground.
The initial energy of the light was Mc2 (= M is light's mass according to classical Maxwell mc2 instead of paradoxical Einstein relativity ) = hν (= h is Planck constant, ν is light frequency ).
When this light was accelerated by gravity under gravitational potential of gL, its light frequency (= ν ) or energy (= hν ) increased to ν(1+gL/c2) = the increased energy of hν(1+gL/c2) = Mc2+MgL = Mc2( 1 + gL/c2 ) , which experimental observation agreed with the ordinary Newtonian classical mechanics (= energy conservation ) irrelevant to Einstein relativity.
This-1st-paragraph says
"As light leaves the surface of a star it must overcome the star’s gravitational attraction. By conservation of energy the light must lose energy to the gravitational potential of the star. Since the energy of a photon is inversely proportional to its wavelength, a loss of energy means the wavelength of the light must increase as it moves farther from the star. In other words, the light is gravitationally redshifted."
↑ When light gains (gravitational potential) energy, the light frequency increases or gets blueshifted ( this-Note ) by energy conservation ( this or this ).
(Fig.2) Relativistic time dilation causes light redshift, when the light is blueshifted in experiments.
Pound and Snider themselves clearly said their gravitational redshift experiment was irrelevant to Einstein relativity ( this-p.1-right-2nd-paragraph ).
If Einstein relativistic time dilation was right, the initial light frequency in 22m higher position should be slightly higher, and this light frequency must decrease to the original ν on the ground where clock runs slower due to gravitational time dilation, which contradicts the observed blueshifted light.
When the light is emitted from the ground toward the detector at the higher position, the light frequency is observed to be lower or red-shifted due to the light losing gravitational potential energy ( this-p.11, this-p.4 ), agreeing with the ordinary Newtonian gravitational potential energy conservation law.
As a result, gravitational red or blue shift can be explained by the ordinary classical energy conservation law, Not by Einstein paradoxical time dilation (= Einstein gravitational time dilation originated from classical Newtonian gravitational energy, though ).
Relativistic time dilation is based on wrong interpretation of experimental redshift or blueshift, as this or this-p.3-(3)'s Δt1 and Δt2 just mean the time needed to measure the n × light wavelengths in different places instead of time dilation.
Light emitted from distant stars are said to be redshifted (= losing energy ) by (fantasy) expanding universe.
↑ This expanding univserse redshifted light is wrong due to violating energy conservation law (= redshifted light loses energy that magically disappear, ( this-p.5 ).
Olbers' paradox (= darkness of night sky ) can be explained by most light emitted from distant stars are reflected back by some objects between the stars and the earth (= Not reaching the earth ), which does Not need the (fantasy) expanding universe nor BigBang.
Light emitted from distant stars tend to lose energy by interstellar medium or dust in the universe due to energy conservation law (= tired light ).
Light is electromagnetic wave oscillating charges in transverse direction, losing energy, so this objection based on (fictitious) photon's momentum change is wrong.
Feel free to link to this site.