Trump government is reported to aim at building practical quantum computers (with fantasy parallel universes ) by 2028, which is unrealistic, just an investment scam under coordination between companies, academia, government officials.
Even the report of quantum computers by 2029 turned out to be a lie and fake news, so this 2028 target is much more unrealistic, just increasing more fake science news.
Trump shouldn't sell his soul to globalists' fake mainstream science such as impractical quantum computers, AI, vaccines, (and global warming ), which just increases inflation, victims of fake science in researchers, students and people across the world, and causes the election fraud (= the mainstream fake science has the power to control all the media ).
Strangely, the double or two-slit interference of a single electron (and a photon ) still remains an unresolved mystery of quantum mechanics hotly debated for a long time.
Why cannot physicists clarify the real mechanism of this simple two-slit experiment of a single particle even now ? ← This deadlocked mainstream quantum mechanics clearly hampers development of technology now.
They have just repeated the same unrealistic explanation that each electron (or a photon ) can be a particle and wave (= paradoxical quantum wave-particle duality ), so the single indivisible electron can unrealistically split into both of two slits at once and interfere like wave ( this or this-3. ) by fictional dead-and-alive cat superposition or parallel worlds ( this-6th-paragraph, this-6th-paragraph ).
↑ As long as physicists repeat this same paradoxical explanation (= an electron is a particle and wave depending on observers ? ) with No progress, they can never resolve this issue nor clarify the real mechanism of double-slit experiments, as you notice (= each unreal electron existing in multiple places at once by quantum parallel worlds is Not a solution, this or this-4th-last-paragraph ).
As all people notice, as long as physicists accept the paradoxical quantum mechanical wave-particle duality (= each indivisible electron particle can pass two slits like wave in many worlds ), it is impossible to clarify the real mechanism of two slit interference of a single electron or a photon or an atom.
A single electron's interference in double-slit experiments by quantum wave-particle duality is clearly false, because a single quantum mechanical electron alone cannot move into the observed constructive interference region. ← An electron pushing itself is pushed back by itself due to action-reaction law, canceling the force on itself (= so No interference by a single electron ).
We can naturally think that each indivisible electron passing one slit generates external de Broglie wave that can split, pass two slits, interfere and affect the electron's position.
↑ This realistic explanation that an electron and its de Broglie wave are different things disproves quantum mechanical wavefunction or wave-particle duality (= causing the unphysically-spreading electron cloud with unreal exchange energy and hampering technology ), and enables us to clarify true mechanisms of the long-unresolved quantum mechanical mystery.
This recent misleading research on the alleged quantum superpositon ↓
1st-paragraph says
"Physicists have demonstrated that even tiny chunks of metal can behave according to the strange rules of quantum mechanics, existing in states that spread across multiple locations at once."
5th-paragraph says -- Just interference, No superposition
"Even at that scale, the particles still produced measurable quantum interference"
↑ So this research just measured (real) de Broglie wave interference of a nano-particle ( this-p.2 ), which is irrelevant to the unphysical quantum mechanical superposition (= paradoxical wave-particle duality ) where a particle can exist in multiple places at once in the above fake news.
Textbooks falsely say Einstein's photoelectric effect shows light's energy is proportional to its frequency (= frequency equals light speed c/wavelength, so this proves light is wave, Not a particle ), which may prove light is a photon particle.
↑ But they cannot explain why a photon particle oscillating rapidly (= higher frequency ) can increase an electron's kinetic energy (= just a photon particle oscillating an electron leftward and rightward cannot increase the electron's kinetic energy in some direction ).
Actually, light or a photon's momentum (= p = E/c, c is light speed c, this-p.3 ) is far smaller than the momentum of a heavier electron (= p = mv = 2E/v, v is an electron's velocity far slower than light speed c ) with the same energy E, which cannot conserve total energy and momentum when an electron absorbs or emits a photon particle.
The only logical explanation is that light wave is absorbed into de Broglie wave (in the medium ) of an electron orbiting around a nucleus (= average momentum of an electron orbiting around a nucleus is almost zero, compatible with the far smaller momentum of light, which can conserve total momentum ).
And light energy or frequency increases de Broglie wave frequency that increases the wave phase velocity (= frequency × wavelength ).
As a result, an electron collides with and appears to be carried by de Broglie wave whose velocity is influenced by light's frequency, compatible with observed photoelectric effect ( this-figure-lower ), which disproves quantum wave-particle duality, because an electron and its de Broglie wave in the medium must be different things to conserve total energy and momentum.
Michelson-Morley experiments conducted on the earth rotating around Sun always measured the constant light speed c regardless of the earth (= observer ) motion, which led to relativistic Lorentz transformation causing twin time-dilation paradox ( this-5.6.5~ ).
↑ When two satellites are rotating in the same orbit in the opposite directions symmetrically, one satellite sees the other satellite's clock moving and ticking slower. ← Which satellite clock ticks slower is paradoxical, changed depending on observers, which is circular twin paradox disproving Einstein relativity, which textbooks (and Google AI overview ) hide.
This circular twin paradox cannot be solved by general relativity, because Michelson-Morley experiments deriving the special relativistic twin paradox were conducted on the earth rotating around Sun (= rotating at a uniform speed belongs to special relativity ).
↑ Actually there is No purely linear motion (= all things' linear motions are slightly curved naturally, or when the rotating radius is very long, this rotation equals linear motion ), so each time two satellites or clocks rotate and meet each other, they see the paradoxical times (= one clock sees the other clock moving and ticking slower ).
In fact, Einstein relativity breaks down in a circular path where one single rotating clock must show multiple different times at once paradoxically (= like unreal quantum parallel worlds ) according to its Lorentz transformation ( this-figure-lower ) which says moving clocks in front tick slower than moving clocks in the back (= in a circle, this faster clock in front and the slower clock in the back meets in one point paradoxically ).
QuEra based on Harvard and MIT lied that they would create a practical fault-tolerant quantum computer with 10000 physical qubits (= one physical or logical qubit takes only 0 or 1 value ) by 2026 ( this or this-last-paragraph ).
↑ Now in 2026, QuEra still has only 448 impractical error-prone atomic qubits ( this or this-Verified-logical qubit, this-QuEra ) instead of the exaggerated 10000 fault-tolerant qubits, which are still far from millions qubits required for a practical quantum computer (= never happen ).
So QuEra moved the goalposts and repeated the outright same lie that they would achieve the 1st fault-tolerant quantum computer called Libra with 10000 physical qubits in 2028 ( this or this-5th~8th-paragraphs ).
↑ These repeated lies about science by academia, top universities and corporations clearly show the current mainstream physics = quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity is false ↓
The media and academia hide the inconvenient fact that the current mainstream quantum mechanics is already disproven in the famous two-slit interference experiments of a single electron, which still Nobody understands strangely.
The unphysical quantum mechanical probability wavefunction with wave-particle duality (= an electron is a particle and wave ? ) needs a single indivisible electron to unrealistically split and pass both of two slits simultaneously to interfere with itself ( this-3rd-last-paragraph, this or this-3. ) by fantasy parallel worlds.
↑ This quantum mechanical explanation is wrong. A single quantum mechanical electron alone cannot move to the observed constructive interference region, because an electron pushing itself is pushed back by itself due to action-reaction law, canceling the force on itself (= so a single quantum mechanical electron is just randomly scattered by two slits without interference patterns contradicting experiments ).
So to explain the experimental two-slit interference of a single electron, an indivisible electron, which passes only one slit, has to generate external de Broglie wave in the medium which wave passes two slits, causes interference and affects the electron's position, which disproves quantum mechanical wavefunction or wave-particle duality ( this-figure-lower ).
Quantum mechanics with fantasy parallel universes is clearly unrealistic, self-contradictory and false.
Then why don't people across the world doubt the quantum mechanics for a long time ?
Because all the media and academia have brainwashed us into falsely believing the (unrealistic) quantum mechanics is already useful for many modern technologies such as computer transistors, smartphones, laser, LED, MRI, solar cells ( this-2nd~3rd-paragraphs ).
↑ This is clearly a lie, because quantum mechanics cannot solve its Schrodinger equations nor predict any multi-electron atomic energies (= also in its impractical approximate methods ), much less predict any modern technologies that were discovered accidentally or by trial-and-error ( this-lower-trail-and-error, this-6.1.4, this or this-1st~2nd-paragraphs ) irrelevant to quantum mechanics.
↑ Useless quantum mechanics is the current only mainstream physics, which is why they falsely claim quantum mechanics is used in all modern technology, regardless of its uselessness.
And they have repeated the same false mantra that quantum mechanics is the most successful theory, because its quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) could predict electron's anomalous magnetic moment to astonishing accuracy for about 100 years ( this-p.1,p.10 ).
↑ Actually QED is far from successful, because QED calculations always diverge to useless infinities that must be artificially removed by other infinite free parameters called bare charge and mass of fictional electrons by illegitimate renormalization which artificial trick was criticized even by QED founders such as Dirac and Feynman as hocus-pocus, shell game, sweeping infinities under the rug..
Einstein relativity lacking the absolute frame causes unsolvable circular twin paradox where two identical clocks (= or satellites ) rotating on the same circle in the opposite directions symmetrically see the other's clock moving and ticking slower (= time dilation ) paradoxically.
All textbooks and the media hide this real circular twin paradox disproving Einstein relativity, and there are No published papers showing legitimate solutions to this fatal circular twin paradoxes.
But Google search by "symmetric circular twin paradox" shows a clearly wrong AI overview (= so AI is useless, rather obstructing real scientific progress, as I said many times ) saying there is no paradox, because two clocks rotating in the opposite directions show no time dilation even as seen from each other's rest frame.
↑ If there is no time dilation nor twin paradox, this means Einstein relativistic Lorentz transformation causing this twin paradox is wrong, so each rotating clocks (or satellites ) can measure speeds faster or slower than light (in Michelson-Morley experiments observed on the earth rotating around Sun ), which disproves Einstein relativity (= forbidding faster-than-light ) in any cases.
See we are brainwashed into falsely believing quantum mechanics is used in modern technologies such as transistors, smartphones, LED, laser,.. by all the media, academia and corporations, which is the biggest lie.
BigTechs such as Microsoft group backed by many universites had no choice but to pursue illusory Majorana quasipartices for their fraudulent topological quantum computers due to today's useless harmful mainstream science victimizing many people, students across the world.
As a result, despite their repeated overhyped fake news like "useful quantum computer in 2029 by AI !", they still cannot make even one Majorana qubit, which remains frauld since old 1937.
It's like other hyped quantum computer companies and China's recent fake quantum memory (= this-lower-potential application remain distant ).
See Google, China, D-Wave quantum supremacy is the biggest scam.
Trump administration may throw away taxpayers' money to hopeless quantum computers based on fictional parallel universes or fraudulent companies such as IBM, D-Wave, Quantinuum, PsiQuantum.. under the chips and science act, though still uncertain.
Quantum computers are impractical, too error-prone to give right answers, cannot factor even the simplest 21 despite extremely long years of researches.
So it is completely meaningless to spend taxpayers' money in IBM allegedly manufacturing (error-prone useless) quantum computer chips that cannot calculate anything except for random sampling.
IBM is one of habitual liars in constantly moving goalposts of when practical computers will come (= like PsiQuantum's hopeless photon quantum computer's million qubit hype, this-myth-4 ), and its publicity stunt 1121-qubit Condor, HSBC's fake quantum advantage.
All quantum computer researchers, companies and public officials in charge of quantum computers definitely know quantum computers are impractical forever.
So the only purpose of this government subsidy given to the hopeless quantum computers is to raise stock price for investment fraud ( this-last-paragraph ), which just increases victims of fake science in students and people across the world, as I said.
In 2025, D-Wave dubious quantum computer supremacy was published in journal Science skyrocketing D-Wave stock price.
D-Wave boldly claimed its quantum annealing machine completed some useful simulations (= untrue ) in 20 minutes, while the same calculations would require a million years in a classical supercomputer ( this-2nd-paragraph ).
But just after this publication, various researchers denied D-Wave quantum supremacy claim in arxiv papers showing an ordinary classical computer (= laptop ) can easily simulate the same thing more accurately (= D-Wave stubbornly did not retract its supremacy claim ).
↑ This arxiv paper ( this-12th-paragraph ) was officially accepted by journal Science, so D-Wave quantum supremacy claim was officially rejected (= this-1st-paragraph ).
This-3rd-last-paragraph (5/2026) says -- Quantum supremacy dead
"One direct outcome of this work: the 2025 quantum supremacy claim (of D-Wave ) does Not hold"
↑ This Science paper (= denying D-Wave supremacy )-p.1-right-lower~p.2-left says
"Specifically, we simulate the same glassy
two- and three-dimensional systems as in Ref. [19 = D-Wave supremacy ] and
show that state-of-the-art accuracies can be achieved
with resources which, for a given annealing time, scale
only linearly in the system size and are readily available
with current classical computing hardware (= laptop ). In the case of cylindrical and diamond lattices our simulations reach
accuracies well beyond those of the quantum annealer
for large system sizes" ← A classical laptop computer easily beat D-Wave quantum annealing.
↑ This tensor network method is a complicated time-consuming classical computer method, but even this time-consuming classical computer method could outperform D-Wave quantum annealing machines.
D-Wave quantum annealing machines are too error-prone to be practical, so they started to use deceptive hybrid computers, which are just classical computers ( this-p.1,p.3 ).
Various fast simple classical computing methods such as Selby and Gurobi can easily outperform not only D-Wave quantum annealing but also its deceptive hybrid quantum machines ( this-p.1-abstract-last ).
So D-Wave quantum annealing was officially dead.
But governments try to waste taxpayers' money in these fraudulent hopeless quantum computing ?
These overhyped fraudulent quantum computers come from today's wrong quantum mechanics (whose Schrodinger equation is proven wrong ) and Einstein relativity (= textbooks hide real circular twin paradox )
The recent overhyped news claimed "Chinese photon quantum computer Jiuzhang 4.0 completed some (useless) task called Gaussian boson sampling in just 25μs, which would take the world's fastest supercomputer 1042 years ! It may solve climate change or discover drugs someday !", which is a complete lie.
Quantum computers still cannot factor even the simplest 21, much less calculate anything faster than a classical computer.
In this boson sampling, Chinese researchers just randomly generated many photons (= just weak classical light detected by a photodetector ), which got through multiple beam splitters and were detected by multiple photodetectors. That's all. No useful calculations ( this-last-paragraph ) nor quantum speed-up.
This-p.6-2nd-last-paragraph says -- Just randomly detecting light
"Boson
Sampling is not a decision or promise problem; rather, it is a sampling problem (i.e. the output is not a
single bit, but a random sample over strings)"
This-p.2-right-middle says -- boson sampling = random numbers
"Boson sampling is a sampling problem
which is closely related to random number generation indeed"
This-last-paragraph says -- No practical use
" GBS (= gaussian boson sampling in this fake quantum advantage ) has No practical applications"
The 4th-last-paragraph of this hyped news also admits -- Useless quantum computer
"The task it performs is highly specialised and not directly comparable to commercial workloads run on classical supercomputers"
↑ This China photon quantum computers suffered many photon loss, a lot of errors with No error correction ( this-p.6-Cons ), which cannot calculate anything, much less outperform today's errorless classical computer, contrary to the fake news.
This-3rd-last-paragraph says -- No calculation, No error correction
"Jiuzhang's hardware is highly specialized, so the quantum computer cannot be programmed to carry out just any calculation... it lacks crucial elements for fault-tolerant and useful quantum computation,... fault tolerance refers to calculations where the quantum computer identifies and corrects its own errors, a long-sought ability that has not yet been achieved in practical quantum computers."
This fake quantum computer speed-up or supremacy is based on the illusory idea that photons (= treated as qubits ) can split into multiple paths by (unreal) quantum parallel worlds or quantum superposition ( this-Scenario, this-p.2-right-upper ), which may take much time for a classical computer with a single real world to simulate ( this or this-7~9th-paragraphs ).
Today's quantum computers are useless, noisy, too error-prone to give right answers, so No evidence of this (illusory) quantum speed-up nor quantum advantage (= Real quantum computer speed-up needs quantum computers to get exact answers, which is impossible in today's erorr-prone quantum computers ).
The recent Google's willow superconducting quantum computer with 65 qubits (= quantum bits ) is also impractical, too error-prone to give right answers ( this-lower-What could still go wrong ), so No quantum speed-up nor quantum advantage, contrary to a lot of fake news.
This-The Reality in 2026 says -- Error-prone useless quantum computer
"quantum devices are too limited in size and too error-prone to outperform classical systems on most practical tasks."
↑ This Google willow's (or Sycamore's ) total accumulated error (= noise ) rate of a useless task called echoes just generating almost random meaningless numbers ( this or this-2nd-paragraph, this-2nd-paragraph ) was estimated to be more than 99.9% (= XEB fidelity is just 0.001, this-middle-what are limitations ? this or this-6~11th-paragraphs, this-p.59 ). ← Far from accurate values (= no exact answers in their random number sampling from the beginning, though )
This new China's photon quantum computer's error rate was much much worse than other quantum computers (= which are also too error-prone, useless, as shown in Google, IBM ), so they could Not even estimate error rate or (XEB) fidelity ( this-p.11(or p.5)-2. p.13-1st-paragraph ).
↑ This-Chinese research review-p.1-Referee #1-2nd-paragraph
says
"I think it does not deserve publication in Nature. Firstly, the
evidence of their device being beyond the classical simulation regime is incomplete. Secondly, it is not clear it is a genuinely
hardware improvement that can lead to fault-tolerance as the authors claim or produces a programable large-size GBS
capable of solving utility problems faster than their classical counterparts"
↑ No clear evidence of this (useless) boson sampling showing quantum computer advantage or speed-up, which is why some refrees made such negative comments.
D-Wave is the only company manufacturing quantum annealing machine used for optimization problems allegedly finding faster traffic, logistic, scheduling by finding the lowest energy qubits' state (= solutions ) from the input value.
↑ Actually the quantum annealing is impractical, almost always giving wrong answers (= stuck in local energy minima ) with No error correction.
Despite this fact, D-Wave and many (manufacturing) companies studying quantum annealing for optimization problems have repeatedly spread overhyped fake news that quantum annealing (= Not real quantum computers ) is already useful for real-world application.
↑ This is a complete lie for investment scam ( this-p.1,p.3 ), because D-Wave founded in 1999 is still increasing its net loss (= D-Wave's expense far surpasses the overhyped revenue ) with No profit nor progress ( this-lower-Loss widens ).
This-3rd-last and last-paragraphs (2026) say -- No quantum computer advantage
"The core issue is that true quantum supremacy for practical problems remains elusive"
"The best known quantum algorithms for optimization still cannot outperform classical heuristics"
The overhyped fake news of quantum computers is ubiquitous regardless of western and non-western countries because people across the world have been constantly brainwashed by all the media, academia and corporations into falsely believing that the 100-year-old quantum mechanics with fictional parallel worlds may simulate atoms and discover drugs someday, and paradoxical Einstein relativity is right.
↑ This fragile dream of qunatum mechanics (or computers ) for drug discovery or some utilities is completely crushed, as shown in the fact that even the recent world's latest IBM-Cleveland-clinic-Riken ( error-prone hopeless ) quantum computer is completely useless for simulating atoms and drug discovery with No progress.
IBM, long-established computer company, is clearly at the center of (mis)leading the world into wasting (taxpayers') money and time in fake useless mainstream physics such as parallel-world quantum computers that still cannot factor even 21 with No progress by cooperating with academia, just increasing victims of the wrong mainstream science and education.
These impractical quantum computers and overhyped AI are useless except for investment and education scams, as seen in the recent Nvidia's classical computer (= AI ? ) only for raising stock price, which cannot fix error-prone quantum computers at all (= relying on the classical computer AI means No quantum computer advantage ).
To hide the current deadend quantum physics, they constantly spread overhyped fake news like "IBM quantum computing could simulate real material" or something.
"Quantum computers for simulating some cancer drugs (= still unrealized ) in IBM-Cleveland giving prize to Algorithmiq" is overhyped, fake with No quantum computer advantage.
Because the current unrealistic parallel-world quantum mechanical variational method for unsolvable Schrodinger equation cannot predict anything nor discover drugs, even if overhyped quantum computers are used with the deceptive hybrid variational quantum eigensolver = VQE (= this-p.6 ).
Today's error-prone useless quantum computers cannot factor even simple 21, much less break 15-bit key or discover drugs, contrary to a lot of fake news.
The overhyped quantum computer-AI is useless for any technology including drugs except for investment and educational scams illegitimately collecting money by exploiting their (fake) mainstream science power and controlling all the media.
Nvidia tried to guess and fix errors of today's useless noisy quantum computers by classical computer's (overhyped) AI training called decoders, which can Not fix the quantum computer's errors.
↑ Relying on classical computers for error correction means there is No quantum computer advantage nor speed-up ( this-lower-Key-challenges remain ).
This-3rd-last-paragraph says -- AI cannot fix quantum computers
"However, practical, large-scale quantum systems still face hardware scaling, coherence, and cost challenges. As Bloomberg Intelligence noted, these (classical computer's) software advances can move timelines, but they do not eliminate the fundamental engineering gaps that remain."
This-4th-last-paragraph says -- Quantum computer impractical forever
" the deployment of practical, large-scale quantum computing remains a long way off,"
Today's overhyped impractical quantum computers ( and AI ) with fantasy parallel universes used only for investment and educational frauds controlling all the media cannot factor even simple 21, much less simulate molecules or materials, contrary to fake news.
↑ A typical example is the recent Sydney university's overhyped fake quantum simulation of some molecular chemical dynamics that may cure skin cancers (= never happen ).
We have beed brainwashed into falsely thinking quantum mechanics with fantasy parallel worlds was useful for modern technology such as transistors and illusory quantum sensors by all the media.
The recent April-fool Google's overhyped theoretical research claims their still-illusory quantum computers may crack the current cryptography by 500000 qubits, which is still far from today's only less than 100 useless qubits.
Today's quantum computers cannot factor even 21 with No progress for long years, so it is impossible to crack today's cryptosystem system, which needs to factor 22048 integers .
↑ Correctly, today's useless quantum computers cannot even factor the simplest 15 by real Shor's algorithm with quantum speed-up based on fantasy parallel universes ( this-last, this-last-paragraph ).
Caltech also made an unrealistic claim that just 10000 neutral atomic qubits (= 10000 neutral atoms unstably trapped in laser light ) may crack cryptography someday, because unlike other fixed qubits, neutral atoms can be shuttled (= take too much time, and increase the risk of losing atoms, though ) to interact with other atoms by laser or optical tweezers ( this-4th-paragraph ).
↑ These dreamlike neutral atoms are impractical forever, too easily lost from laser trap just by reading and moving them ( this-the challenges, this-9th-paragraph ).
Caltech boasts of their current 6100-neutral atomic qubits, which are still Not a quantum computer nor able to calculate anything ( this-p.3-left-2nd-paragraph ) due to easily loss of atoms.
As a result both Google and Caltech quantum computer threats are illusion, just overhyped fake news ( this-3rd-last-paragraph ) to raise share price ( this-2nd-last-paragraph ).
In fact, we are brainwashed into falsely thinking quantum mechanics with fantasy parallel worlds was useful for modern technology by all the media, academia, corporation for long years for investment and educational scam.
See the recent Chinese (fake) quantum computer system of just 9 atoms (= Not a quantum computer ) outperforming classical computer's machine learning is overhyped fake news
Apart from the recent Google's fake news on useless quantum encryption, the long-established IBM with actual computer technology has been one of main culprits of protecting the unreal quantum mechanics for 100 years.
This-2nd-paragraph linked to IBM's exaggerated research using unreal spinon quasiparticle with artificially-chosen model and free parameters with No quantum mechanical prediction (= this IBM research-p.5-3rd-paragraph = unreal spinon-quasiparticle, p.10-3rd-paragraph = choose free parameters J, ε ).
See Molecular simulation by IBM hybrid quantum computer is scam.
Unrealistic quantum mechanical Schrödinger equations are unsolvable, cannot predict anything, and today's (fake) impractical quantum computers cannot even factor the simplest 21.
So "quantum computers designing drugs !" is just overhyped fake news, as seen in the fraudulent Clevelend-clinic-IBM-quantum computer drug design.
For 100 years, people across the world have been brainwashed and deceived by all the media, corporation (= for investment fraud ) and academia spreading overhyped fake news trying to make the impractical old quantum mechanics or computers appear to be a promising state-of-the-art technology for drug discovery, which will never happen.
Today's error-prone quantum computers cannot factor even the simplest 21, much less molecular energy calculation as stated in overhyped fake news.
So the recent IBM, Oxford's seeming quantum computer simulation of some half-Möbius molecule is also overhyped fake news.
Quantum annealing computer company D-Wave continues to increase its net loss with No profit (= D-Wave's expense far exceeds its overhyped tiny revenue, this-135-plus customers ).
↑ This D-Wave constant finantial deficit shows its bold claims of quantum computer practical advantage proved to be fake just to raise stock price by spreading overhyped fake news ( this-p.1,p.3 ).
This D-Wave bad financial report is compatible with the latest research paper (= this-p.1-abstract-last, p.2-left-5th-paragraph ) in 2026 showed No quantum computers including fraudulent D-Wave annealing had quantum advantage nor speed-up over classical computers.
I don't think any customers want to buy these very expensive (= million-dollar ) useless D-Wave annealing machines instead of much-cheaper better classical computers' software ( this-p.1-abstract-last ), so I suspect that D-Wave secretly refunded money to customers after the customers pretended to buy D-Wave expensive annealing machines (= this is the trick of D-Wave's expense far exceeding revenue ) to cooperate for unjustly raising stock price by manipulating all the media.
Another fraudulent quantum computer company = IonQ's (useless) ion qubits also increased net loss both in the 2025 GAAP and adjusted EBITDA (= related to quantum computer's sale ) accounts, showing quantum computers remain useless with No profit nor progress ( this-lower, this-lower-Acquisition strategy.. ).
Today's quantum computers cannot even factor the simplest 21, so any claims such as quantum computers could calculate robots' motion or atomic energies are fake, conducted by ordinary classical computers disguised as ' hybrid computers'.
Microsoft lies "quantum computers will be practical by 2029 ( this-4th-paragraph )", which clearly contradicts their former statements of practical quantum computers by 2025 or 2023, moving the goalposts, again. ← Microsoft still cannot build even one (illusory) Majorana qubit.
Quantum computers calculating molecular energy is also overhyped fake news to make the deadend quantum computers appear to be promising.
Today's quantum computers are fake, unable to factor even 21 (= factoring or breaking RSA-2048-bit numbers = 10616 integers is impossible forever, just fearmongering ), so "such quantum computers may discover drugs" is overhyped fake news, while quantum mechanics is useless for medical research forever.
See this week's overhyped fake news on (hopeless) quantum internet, sensors. Quantum computers turned out to be just investment fraud (= this-p.5~ ).
See this week's fake news on Stanford's quantum supercomputer is overhyped, fake, which is harmful.
See this week's fake news on overhyped Fault-tolerant quantum computers for drones AI in military defense.
See Airbus quantum computer for airplane fluid dynamics is scam.
See this week's overhyped fake news on BBC's blatant lie about Google Willow quantum computer's errors.
↑ Even the world's largest mainstream media influencing education outrightly lied about today's (useless) mainstream physics of parallel-world quantum computers and Einstein relativity, which fake mainstream science causes serious problems such as school's truancy and rising tuition.
Quantum computers may break RSA encryption by factoring 22048 = 2048-bit integers is overhyped fake news.
Today's error-prone useless quantum computers can Not factor even 21 = 3 × 7 by Shor's algorithm without cheating (= they needed to know answers in advance in factoring, this-4th-paragraph ) let alone RSA's 22048 integers despite long years of fruitless researches.
" Chinese researchers might factor 2048-bit RSA integers by D-Wave" is also fake (= they needed to know answers of some easy special integers in advance and used only 6 qubits, which is useless ).
"Gravitational wave validated Einstein relativity !" is also fake news.
↑ The current fraudulent useless mainstream science full of overhyped fake news taught in schools is why school truancy problems are getting worse.
Accurate quantum computers with million qubits turned out be overhyped fake news.
↑ Today's fake useless mainstream science such as fraudulent quantum computers and paradoxical Einstein relativity clearly caused the current increasing serious truancy problems across the world.
↑ From the abnormally-high 30% truancy rate, we should notice something is wrong in today's education and science.
Today's students are victims of fake useless science (= so boring ) such as parallel-world quantum mechanics, computers, unreal quasiparticles, climate change, fantasy BigBang promoted by educational industries, special interest groups of universities and corporations, which abnormal states based on fake mainstream science (= No progress for long years ) are vaguely felt by today's students' keen intuition or gut feeling, causing students to be truant or endure boring stressful school life.
See this week's overhyped fake news caused by today's deadend science stuck in unrealistic old extra-dimensional "theory-of-everything" or string theory for 50 years (= No progress ). ← An exorbitant university tuition has to be paid for these illusory impractical extra-dimensional theories.
The current technology has stopped progressing, because they still rely on quantum mechanical unreal old quasiparticle model such as excitons created in old 1931.
↑ This recent overhyped news on this illusory exciton quasiparticle's potential for (hopeless) fantasy parallel-world quantum computers is fake news, as shown in its research paper's abstract saying nothing about any practical application including quantum computers, contrary to its hyped news.
↑ Which do you think we should punish, truant students' parents or today's fraudulent useless mainstream science filled with fake news taught in schools ?
Feel free to link to this site.
