Globalists, Bill Gates, corporations, universities, media.. don't stop brainwashing us by today's fake mainstream science such as global warming, (ineffective) vaccines, parallel-world quantum computing and overhyped useless AI.
They plot to impose unnecessary regulation by inciting fear for illusory overhyped AI apocalypse and quantum computers' threat to get (taxpayers') money from ordinary people, which just exacerbates inflation and inconvenience. ↓
Actually, Anthropic, one of advocates for unneeded AI regulation, hyped (fake) AI discovery of novel enzyme (= CRISPR ) system ↓
This or this debunked Anthropic exaggerated claim ↓
7th-last-paragraph says -- Useless AI
"However,.. a microbiologist.. expressed scepticism about the scientific significance of the announcement."
4th-last-paragraph says -- Fake AI technology
"There's nothing to indicate this is a rival to CRISPR-the-technology (= obtained from natural bacteria, No quantum mechanics ), or could be developed into any kind of therapeutic or practical application ( this-middle~lower )"
↑ AI is just an overhyped pseudo-science which does Not cause apocalyose nor drug discovery, so No need for AI regulation. We should just stop wasting (taxpayers') money in the meaningless AI and fraudulent deadend quantum computing to stop inflation. ↓
IonQ, one of fraudulent quantum computing companies, spread overhyped fake breakthrough news in quantum computing error correction, again.
↑ Actually, all quantum computing companies including IonQ and academia have already given up building useful quantum computers due to their inability to correct errors, which inconvenient fact is hidden from ordinary people.
So this overhyped IonQ research used only an ordinary classical computer (= CPU ) called decoding for generating artificial errors and correcting them in fake quantum computing simulation, which is useless, cannot correct actual quantum computers' errors (= this is why IonQ used only a classical computer instead of its hopeless quantum computers ).
This or this on the fake useless IonQ's quantum error correction ↓
1st-paragraph says -- No quantum computer used
"However, the input was simulated error data generated by IonQ from a noise model—No actual quantum computer was used"
5th-last-paragraph says -- Not get correct results
"In other words, what these figures measure is whether the decoder completes its work within the time budget— Not whether the computation's results are correct."
This or this-My Analysis-3rd-paragraph says -- IonQ's lie
"All of it ran against a simulated (= classical computing ) machine. None of the syndromes in this paper came from a real ion (= No ion-qubit quantum computer was used ).... IonQ’s release headline, which calls this software the industry's first end-to-end real-time quantum error decoder, is wrong as worded."
↑ This IonQ fake quantum error correction simulation did Not correct errors nor get any right answers. ↓
The recent news falsely claims that CERN researchers could transport 92 antiprotons (= antiparticles ) for a month.
↑ In fact, this dubious CERN research did Not measure large energy (> GeV ) of 92 antiprotons annihilated with protons, so No evidence of antiprotons transported.
They tried to indirectly guess the existence of (unreal) antiparticles by measuring the slight electrical noise change of a superconducting resonant circuit sensing oscillating (unknown) charged particles trapped in electromagnetic field of Penning trap ( this or this-9th~10th-paragraphs ).
↑ These trapped charged particles are Not antiprotons but just electrons mixed with protons such as H- ions, which fact was admitted even by CERN. ↓
The current physics claims light (= γ rays ) or a photon with large energy and momentum (= because light cannot stop ) produces a pair of an antiparticle and a particle at rest with No momentum, which clearly violates momentum conservation law.
↑ Einstein relativity claims the light or a photon always moving at the constant light speed c cannot stop nor have zero momentum.
↑ So the light or photon's energy must be transferred into some potential energy stored in the medium at rest to produce the antiparticle and the particle at rest from the light with momentum, which disproves Einstein relativity rejecting the medium (= aether ).
So the present mainstream physics paradoxically claims that only unreal virtual photon, which can have unreal imaginary mass, can produce an antiparticle and a particle in pair production in Feynman diagram, which fact disproves the current physics and (useless) antiparticles. ↓
The overhyped news tries to make the hopeless Microsoft's Majorana quantum chips look promising for research on defence and AI.
↑ Microsoft has Not built even one Majorana qubit (= one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value ) based on fictional quasiparticle ( this-3rd-paragraph ), which is just fraud, impractical forever, contrary to a lot of overhyped fake news.
↑ Globalist Microsoft's Bill gates' unrealistic claim of AI apocalypse is based on this current fictional science such as parallel-world quantum computing, so scientifically unreliable. ← Globalists = missionary of today's fake mainstream science ↓
This or this-lower-Milliseconds show how much room remains says
"The 180-microsecond quantum result (= storing time ) is still far shorter than the storage times that large multisegment quantum networks may eventually require."
↑ The overhyped quantum memory just storing weak light or a photon for only very short time or less than 180 microseconds (= most of the photons stored in the useless quantum memory are lost ) is an impractical memory forever. ↓
This overhyped news on fake quantum simulation of matter, quarks ↓
6th-paragraph says -- Fictional quarks
"Quarks are studied indirectly thanks to the most powerful accelerators. We do not have ways to slowly pull apart quarks and see what happens."
8th-paragraph says -- 13 ions = unseen quarks ?
"The simulator was made of 13 trapped ions that could be tuned with lasers. The setup of the simulator was encoded to act like a string-breaking model."
↑ So this research recklessly tried to express unseen quarks bound by nuclear strong force by 13 trapped ions that do Not use nuclear strong force at all between ions. ↓
↑ Each interaction between two ions is very weak magnetic interaction between two ions' nuclear magnetic spins, which are completely different from quarks' nuclear strong force, so this research' claim of quantum simulation of quarks is wrong.
↑ Just 13 ion qubits (= one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value, so still Not a quantum computer ) cannot calculate or simulate anything like a useful classical computer, contrary to hypes.
↑ This or this-p.10-right-3rd-paragraph says -- No quantum prediction
"several values of h/J
and the lowest value g/J = 0.75 (= artificially-adjusted free interaction parameters between ions ) for the coupling strength in our experimental simulations. These parameters are far from the theoretical
perturbative limit, where the approximation would be quantitatively
accurate. Nonetheless, the dynamical behaviour exhibits qualitative
similarity (= this simulation is Not quantitatively accurate ) with the exact string dynamics"
The overhyped fake news falsely claims that Large hadron collider (= LHC ) detected (illusory) Higgs decaying into two unseen short-lived Z bosons with up and down entangled spins (= irrelevant to superluminal spooky action ).
↑ First of all, these unstable Higgs and Z-bosons are unreal, too short-lived to detect directly ( this or this-3rd-paragraph ).
Furthermore, a Higgs with 125 GeV mass (= energy ) cannot decay into two Z bosons, whose total mass (= 182 GeV ) exceeds the original Higgs, due to violating energy-mass conservation law.
So this research unrealistically says one of these Z bosons may be an unreal virtual particle which can have unreal imaginary mass and disobey Einstein relativistic mass-energy relation ( this-16th-paragraphs~last ).
All the present particle physics experiments rely on these unreal virtual particles in electric, weak, strong forces, and antiparticle production, which means the current standard model is wrong. ↓
All the particle physics experiments including this research have to precisely measure total energy summing all energies of final products such as electrons and photons (= light ) into which the (illusory) Higgs, W,Z bosons decay to estimate the mass (= energy ) of the original unseen Higgs, W, Z bosons, quarks.. and prove their existence.
But the detection efficiency of all the particle colliders such as LHC is too bad to precisely measure the total energy, as seen in too bad detection (= quantum ) efficiency (<: 30% = more than 70% photon energy is lost ) of today's photodetections.
To measure electrons' energy into which unseen Higgs, W,Z bosons are said to decay, LHC uses electromagnetic (sampling) calorimeters which lose almost all energy in inactive (= dense absorber ) layers as invisible energy ( this or this-p.30 ), which cannot measure total energy precisely nor validate the existence of (unseen) Higgs, W,Z bosons, quarks...
So there is No experimental evidence that today's particle physics or standard model is right in its too short-lived unseen (illusory) particles. ↓
The overhyped AI is just an useless pseudo-science like global warming, ineffective vaccines and parallel-world quantum computers, just causing inflation (= instead of deflation claimed by a lot of overhyping media ) by wasting (taxpayers') money with No power to cure diseases nor cause apocalypse.
Unnecessary AI regulations for illusory apocalypse just enable some organizations to make profit by stealing taxpayers' money like the illusory post-quantum computer's threat.
↑ You can easily know AI is just a useless, deadend pseudo-science, as seen in NVIDIA wasting its time only in impractical fraudulent quantum mechanics and quantum computing which still cannot fact even 21 despite extremely long years of researches. ↓
This hyped fake quantum-AI oprimization problem (2026) says
Insider Brief says -- No quantum computers used
"The study used NVIDIA H200 GPU simulation rather than quantum hardware" ← So this research used only a classical computer's GPU instead of today's error-prone useless quantum computer hardware.
4th-paragraph says -- Use prior knowledge = AI
"the team first showed it what strong results looked like. They ran the conventional trial-and-error method across many sampled problems, kept only the near-optimal circuits, and used those examples to train a transformer"
6th-paragraph says -- Just 12 qubits = Not a quantum computer
"circuit-finding time rose sharply from about 34 seconds on 4 qubits to more than 11 minutes on 12 qubits (= useless, far from millions of qubits required for a pracical quantum computer ). The generative approach held nearly 28 seconds for every size previously tested"
↑ So this research used only a classical computer (= GPU or fake AI ) to simulate the fictional 12 qubits (= one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value, so still Not a quantum computer ) and find bitstrings giving some optimized (= lowest-energy ) values from the input parameters and the previous results in the impractical QAOA method. ↓
This hyped NVIDIA quantum simulation ↓
2nd-paragraph says -- Only classical computer used
"the companies generated the largest-known Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE = useless, choosing fake trial atomic wavefunctioins that cannot predict anything due to the unsolvable Schrodinger equation ) emulated (= classical computer's emulator ) molecular database,"
Last-paragraph says -- Just 28-qubit simulation
"with the vast majority in the 24–28 qubit regime... The resulting dataset directly enables more accurate (useless) DFT functional training,"
↑ So this research used only a classical computer emulating the illusory 28 qubits (= one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value, so still Not a quantum computer ) to seemingly get some molecular energy by the impractical quantum mechanical variational method and DFT which just choose fake trial wavefunctions, pseudo-potential and exchange-correlation energy functionals which cannot predict anything nor discover drugs due to the free choice of those many free parameters. ↓
This hyped news on quantum state in cells with unreal quasiparticle model ↓
10th-paragraph says
"Molecules and structures vibrate at characteristic frequencies"
13th-paragraph says
"Mitochondrial quantum state provides a good way to explain the unknown frequency"
14th-paragraph says -- No evidence of quantum mechanics
"That interpretation remains hypothetical, not direct proof"
17th-paragraph says -- Unreal quasiparticle model
"Their model suggests that light particles inside a mitochondrion couple with the collective vibrations of its CH2 bonds. They form a shared hybrid state called a polariton (= unreal quasiparticle model, this-2nd-last-paragraph ), combining properties of light and matter"
This-lower-Challenges remaining.. says -- No quantum mechanics
"First, detection of a distinctive spectroscopic signal alone cannot prove the existence of a quantum state"
↑ So this research just illuminated cells' mitochodria by some ligh wave, and tried to explain this light-excited state by fictional polariton quasiparticle model with No quantum mechanical prediction nor evidence.
↑ This-paper's p.12~ Materials and methods used No quantum mechanical calculations, which means No evidence of quantum mechanical states in living cells, and quantum mechanics proved to be useless for medicine. ↓
This-2nd-last-paragraph says -- Useless quantum sensors
"While the study shows the promise of NV diamond magnetometers, there remains a performance gap compared to.." ← Still impractical quantum sensors. ↓
This hyped news on quantum computing challenging 48-year-old math ↓
3rd-paragraph says -- Cannot get right answers
"What's important here is not that the quantum computer got to the right answer"
7th-paragraph says -- Classical computers needed
"The researchers got their quantum system to do this using a hybrid implementation " ← Hybrid means just a classical computer.
14th-paragraph says -- No quantum computer advantage nor AI
"the researchers suggest that quantum computing could help AI solve math problems that its algorithms are currently unable to solve on classical computers – though it's worth emphasizing that none of that was tested here."
4th-last-paragraph says -- Impractical quantum computers
"However, to take it further forward, the physical hardware of quantum computers available will (= still unrealized ) need to get better "
↑ So this research used a classical computer + today's error-prone quantum computer to deal with some simple impractical qubit operation with No useful quantum computation nor getting right answers.
A lot of overhyping media falsely claim Einstein relativistic gravity was right again, passing a quantum mechanical test, too !
↑ In fact, this research has nothing to do with Einstein relativistic theory or quantum mechanics.
In this research, cold atoms split into two big de Broglie waves, one of which went up and free-fell under Newtonian (or non-relativistic Galilean ) gravity and interfered with the other atomic de Broglie wave moving straight.
But the media unrealistically said each cold atom split into two (fictional) matter waves in two quantum mechanical superposition or parallel worlds, and one atomic wave experienced (Newtonian) gravity matching Einstein equivalence principle !
↑ Einstein equivalence principle postulating gravitational and inertial masses are equal was proposed by Newton and Galileo, which is irrelevant to the paradoxical Einstein relativity. ↓
↑ This research was conducted at extremely cold temperature where multiple cold atoms constituted one common big de Broglie wave by Bose-Einstein condensate ( this-9th-paragraph, this-3rd~5th-paragraphs, this-last-paragraph ), splitting into two big de Broglie waves by magnetic field, which did Not need each atom to split into two de Broglie waves by (fictional) quantum superposition or parallel worlds.
Einstein relativity and quantum mechanical wavefunction diagree with real experimentaly-verified de Broglie wave, so this research disproved Einstein and quantum mechanics instead of proving them. ↓
Japanese NEC company, which was one of pioneers in quantum computing, has finally given up developing physical quantum computers in both gate-type and annealing.
Today's quantum computers are useless, hopeless forever, as shown in the fact that even top quantum computers of Google and IBM can only output random meaningless numbers with a lot of errors that can never be corrected, so cannot factor even 21.
So NEC tried to develop quantum annealing machines (= Not a real quantum computer ). ↓
But quantum annealing is also impractical, too error-prone to solve even the simplest optimization (= traveling salesman ) problems.
D-Wave (= top quantum annealing manufacturer ) colluding with many companies across the world has just repeated fake quantum advantage by using ordinary classical computers disguised as hybrid quantum machines, compared with deliberately-chosen bad classical methods ( this-p.1,p.3 ).
Contrary to a lot of overhyped fake news, quantum annealing is also impractical forever, as seen in D-Wave increasing its net loss with No profit from its useless quantum annealers.
This is why NEC finally decided to withdraw from building (hopeless) physical quantum computers, which is a right decision, though it took a little too much time to arrive at this decision, I think.
↑ Hopeless quantum computers relying on fictional parallel-world calculations is the only hope of the current deadend quantum mechanics, which fact disproves quantum mechanics. ↓
Quantinuum's ion-trap-qubit quantum computers are also too error-prone, useless forever like other qubits.
So Quantinuum fabricated fake quantum advantage that unfairly told only the (useless) quantum computing right answers that were kept unknown to an errorless classical computer that couldn't guess right answers.
↑ Governments and corporations should stop wasting (taxpayers') money in these hopeless fraudulent quantum computers, which just worsens inflation like overhyped AI, if they have conscience to stop the current fake quantum technology's invenstment and educational fraud. ↓
Fujitsu, Delft and QuTech try to promote a diamond-based quantum computer aiming at (pie-in-the-sky) 1000 logical qubits.
↑ But this diamond-type quantum computer is impractical forever, because it cannot have more than 2 ~ 7 qubits (= one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value, so Not a quantum computer nor able to calculate anything ), as seen in the latest QuTech's research in 6/2026.
This is why overhyped SAXON-Q and Fujitsu tend to hide their inconvenient truth = how many diamond qubits are actually realized now ( this-6th-paragraph ) = probably just 2 useless qubits. ↓
This overhyped news on quantum computer's microscope ↓
6~7th-paragraphs say -- No quantum computation
"We let them (= electrons ) interact with ions (= useless quantum computers ) that are held in place along the path of the electron beam"
5th-last-paragraph says -- Still No experiments
"So far, the researchers have shown mathematically that the new method should offer important advantages. The next challenge is to demonstrate those benefits experimentally."
↑ So this research just showed the idea (= with No experimental realization ) of colliding electrons with trapped ions in electron microscopes with No real quantum computation.
The media, academia have repeatedly made false claims that (unreal) quantum mechanics was useful for developing computer transistors, smartphones, LED.. ( this-3:00~ ) for a long time like the current overhyped quantum computing scam.
↑ Actually all these useful technologies such as transistors were discovered accidentally or by trial-and-error approach irrelevant to (useless) quantum mechanics that cannot solve its Schrodinger equation nor predict any multi-electron atomic energy, much less discover transistors, smartphones ( this-lower, this or this-6.1.4 ), sensors. ↓
This site-The transistor wrongly says "Its (= transistor ) operation depends on band theory, the quantum-mechanical description"
↑ The same site's author says contradictory thing in this or this-Quantum chemistry & materials ↓
"if you want to predict.. what the band structure of a new material might be, you need to solve Schrödinger’s equation,,. This is computationally very challenging – for anything beyond the smallest molecules, classical computers struggle"
↑ In 1940s when the first transistors were discovered, even classical computers did Not exist, so physicists could Not calculate nor predict semiconductors beyond the smallest molecules, if this author's explanation is right.
↑ Correctly, quantum mechanical unsolvable Schrodinger equations cannot predict even the smallest molecules.
Quantum mechanics is wrong, inconsistent, unrealistic, just obstructing technologies for a long time ( this-figure-lower ). ↓
This site on useless quantum computer protein folding ↓
5th-paragraph says -- No quantum advantage nor utility
"the results do not yet establish that quantum computers can outperform the best classical protein-modeling tools or predict the structures of medically important proteins"
15th-paragraph says -- Classical computer needed
"VQE is a hybrid algorithm (= a classical computer must calculate and find the answer instead of useless quantum computer ) in which a quantum circuit prepares and measures possible states while a classical optimizer adjusts the circuit "
10th-last-paragarph says -- Wrong prediction
"a stable, negative-energy arrangement fell from 97.3% for seven amino acids to.. 1.5% for 10" ← Success rate of predicting just 10 amino acids' stable structure dropped to just 1.5%
8th-paragraph says -- No quantum mechanical prediction
"The current version uses randomized versions of an amino-acid interaction matrix... Future versions are expected to support empirical interaction values, experimental constraints and more realistic physical models." ← Experimental data is needed, No quantum mechanical prediction
5th-last-paragraph says -- Just 25 useless qubits
"A 10-residue peptide typically requires 20 to 25 qubits (= one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value, so just 25 error-prone qubits are useless still Not a quantum computer that needs millions of qubits )"
↑ So researchers have to rely on a classical computer as the deceptive "hybrid" where a useless quantum computer with only 25 error-prone qubits can calculate nothing, and the quantum mechanics cannot predict exact peptide structures without using experimental values. ↓
This-news on overhyped useless IonQ's quantum drug discovery ↓
5th-paragraph says -- Just 8 qubits, No quantum computers
"It automatically isolated the strongly correlated region down to a 4-orbital active space mapped onto 8 qubits,"
↑ So this research chose only 4 electrons' orbitals (= out of many orbitals of an enzyme ) mapped onto only 8 useless qubits (= one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value, so just 8 qubits are useless, cannot calculate anything, much less discover drugs ).
↑ And just calculating those chosen 4 electrons' orbitals had to rely on a classical computer as the deceptive hybrid (= impractical VQE was used in this research where the quantum mechanical approximate variational methods cannot predict anything ). ↓
Overhyped Xanadu and PsiQuantum's photon quantum computers are hopeless, deadend with only less than 4 photon qubits (= one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value, so still Not a quantum computer nor able to calculate anything ) due to massive loss of photons.
This or this-7th-paragraph (8/2026) says -- Just 4 useless photon qubits
"nearly all photonic chip demonstrations to date work with two-photon or at most four-photon (= just 4 photon qubits ) states."
So the recent Xanadu's research on quantum computing for cancer drug discovery and simulating Mitsubishi lithography is just overhyped fake news.
↑ This Xanadu's overhyped cancer paper-p.1 abstract says -- No quantum computation
"Our resource estimates, obtained with PennyLane, suggest that systems with
active spaces ranging from 11 to 45 spatial orbitals can be simulated using 180-350 logical qubits"
↑ Xanadu just roughly estimated how many (still-non-existent) logical qubits will be needed for future researches without any real quantum computation on these overhyped researches on cancer therapy or lithography.
↑ There is still No single workable errorless logical qubit (= each logical qubit taking only 0 or 1 value must consist of more than 1000 physical qubits, this-18th~20th-paragrahs ← the hopeless photon quantum computer had only less than 4 physical qubits ).
Fraudulent quantum computing industry has repeated the same obvious lies: "The practical quantum computing is just several ~ 5 years away" for more than 30 years ( this-1. The Puzzle ) to deceive ordinary people by manipulating all the world's media.
Actually, quantum computers (= based on wrong quantum mechanics ) are impractical, unable to correct errors forever, as shown in fake quantum supremacy just outputting random meaningless numbers with a lot of errors in Google, IBM, D-Wave...
The recent untrustworthy Wall street journal article-7th-paragraph blatantly lied that "But because quantum computers can spot certain mathematical patterns, they excel at factoring very large numbers." ← They intentionally look away from the fact that today's deadend (fake) quantum computers cannot factor even 21 despite long years of fruitless researches. ↓
Quantum computers, which are impractical forever, always need fake promises to justify wasting (taxpayers) money in harmful quantum computing facilities like in Chicago.
This-19th-paragraph says -- Fake quantum computing promise
"some industry leaders think quantum processors will eventually become components inside data centers, lowering their overall energy demand rather than adding to it" ← Never happen
↑ As you see, quantum computing industries repeated the same lie as the overhyped AI that would allegedly make our life energy efficient and cause deflation, which is completely opposite to the current actual AI inflation. ↓
The recent overhyped fake news falsely claims "(impractical) quantum computing (of fraudulent IBM ) used in first commercial RPG game development"
↑ Actually, No quantum computers were used to develop the game. ↓
↑ This-1st-paragraph says -- No quantum computer used
"under the banner of 'quantum computing in a commercial game.' However, No quantum processor is actually speeding up the game. Instead, quantum circuits are simulated on a classical computer" ↓
Another quantum fake news also falsely claims IBM quantum computers might be usable for drug docking or discovery.
This site on the same quantum drug docking news ↓
3rd-paragraph says -- Just 6 useless qubits
"One test used six qubits to represent 18 variables," ← one qubit takes only 0 or 1 value, so just 6 qubits are useless, cannot calculate anything, much less simulate drug docking.
5th-paragraph says -- No quantum computing advantage
"The findings don’t show that quantum computers can perform molecular docking better or faster than classical computers"
Quantum computers are impractical forever, and quantum mechanics cannot predict anything nor discover drugs.
↑ So this misleading research picked up only small numbers of atoms of the already-known experimentally-determined protein-ligand structures (= so they knew answers or the right docking structure from the beginning ) for the deceptive hybrid quantum computing (= just a classical computer ) with No quantum computation nor quantum mechanical prediction nor new drug discovery. ↓
Like corporations, FAU university spreads overhyped quantum fake news claiming quantum computing machine learning predicted some heart diseases.
↑ Actually this overhyped FAU quantum machine-learning used No real quantum computers (= that cannot factor even 21, much less conduct AI or machine-learning ).
↑ This-FAU paper's-2.6.2 says -- No quantum computers used
"All quantum experiments in this study are conducted in a simulation-based environment (= just a classical computer ) rather than on a physical quantum processing unit. "
↑ So this overhyped quantum research used just a classical computer simulator + machine-learning based on clinical data with No quantum computation nor quantum mechanical prediction, and this machine-learning (= AI ) is also useless. ↓
The overhyping Q-CTRL quantum soltware company falsely claimed the quantum sensors could measure earth's gravity for navigating a vessel.
↑ They say atoms falling under gravity showed (de Broglie) wave properties that could be measured by laser interference ( this-middle-picture ), which is quantum mechanics according to their (false) definition.
The current unrealistic quantum mechanical wavefunction (= proven false ) based on de Broglie wave theory cannot use real de Broglie wave ( this-figure-lower ).
Overhyped quantum sensors such as nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond do Not use the (useless) quantum mechanical (unsolvable) Schrodinger equation that cannot predict anything (= actually, this Q-CTRL paper's p.9 incorporating quantum atom interferometer into a classical sensor used No quantum mechanical Schrodinger equation ). ↓
The overhyped neutral atomic qubits use two energy levels of each atom unstably trapped in laser light as a quantum bit's 0 or 1.
It is easy to increase the numbers of the cheap neutral atoms (= qubits ) and photons (= just weak light ), but these neutral atomic and photon qubits are impractical forever and inferior due to their easy loss of atoms (= from laser trap ) and photons which cannot compute anything by connecting multiple qubits ( this-neutral atom quantum computers ).
So the overhyped Caltech's 6100 neutral atomic qubits turned out to be just a publicity stunt that cannot calculate anything nor linking even two atomic qubits ( this-5th-paragraph, this-p.3-left-2nd-paragraph ), like IBM condor.
In the latest research of the same Caltech team, they had to reduce the numbers of neutral atomic qubits from 6100 to just 35 atoms (= this-7th,10th-paragraphs ) to express some impractical quantum mechanical fictional quasiparticle model with a lot of errors that cannot be corrected (= instead, they just illegitimately discarded erroneous results such as lost atoms post-selectively, this-p.10-left-3rd-paragraph ). ↓
Quantum battery is just a useless fake battery consisting of molecules just storing absorbed light transiently for extremely short time (= just less than nanoseconds ). ↓
This latest news on this hyped useless quantum battery says (= middle, A delicate state section )
"However, at present, the prototype battery can only hold a very small amount of energy – a few billion electron volts – for a matter of nanoseconds." ↓
The recent Microsoft AI quantum mechanical simulation tried to use the old inaccurate quantum mechanical approximate density functional theory (= DFT ) and make its new (fake) pseudo-potential called exchange-correlation (= XC ) energy functional from some experiemntal training datasets ( this-1st~2nd-paragraphs ).
↑ For the unsolvable impractical Schrodinger equation that cannot predict anything. this most-widely-used quantum DFT approximation treating the whole molecules as one fake electron has to rely on artificially-created exchange-correlation (= XC ) energy functionals whose exact form is unknown or does Not exist, which is also impractical forever, cannot predict anything ( this-p.7 ).
This or this-3rd-last-paragraph says -- Impractical quantum simulation
"he is skeptical about how it will fare with metals and solids. He questioned the group’s tests of Skala’s performance and says he wants to see it challenged with more-complex calculations." ↓
Quantum mechanics is wrong, cannot use real electrons and de Broglie wave, which prevents developing nano-technology ( this-figure-lower ).
Bohm pilot wave theory trying to solve the paradoxical wave-particle duality within quantum mechanics has to disobey action-reaction law, which disproves quantum mechanics.
Trump should return from the illusory quantum parallel worlds to his original mission of removing the election fraud. ← If Trump just 'pretends' to resolve the election fraud issues like in Epstein file case, it clearly betrays his supporters including January 6.
You can know the election fraud by Dominion voting machines was real from the fact that Dominion reached confidential settlement with Giuliani, Sidney Powell, one America news in the same September in 2025 (= reaching settlements with three persons at the same time confidentially means Dominion could Not get money in compensation, and wanted to hide this fact of no compensation and the election fraud. this-4th~5th-paragraphs ).
↑ For eight months even after the company was acquired by the alleged former republican, the defamation lawsuit against Lindell continued (= so republican owner is irrelevant to this lawsuit ), and Dominion was forced to drop the lawsuit, though Lindell is still claiming the election fraud with a lot of evidence, which means the election fraud was real.
This historically largest election fraud is caused by the current fake mainstream science which has the power to control all the media, academia, corporations and government officials like the old Galileo era banning freedom of speech and science (= actually today's wrong mainstream Einstein relativity allows the unreal geocentricism of the old Catholic church ).
↑ This obvious election fraud may be hard to solve even by Trump who seems to be selling his soul to the current fake mainstream science such as useless quantum computers (= the current mainstream quantum parallel worlds are more unrealistic than the old flat-earth theory ) and AI causing this election fraud.
↑ This is why not only left-wing but also right-wing media such as Fox and newsmax, which are also controlled by this globalist's fake mainstream science such as quantum computers and AI, had to pretend to lose the lawsuit in Dominion defamation case.
QuEra based on Harvard and MIT lied that they would create a practical fault-tolerant quantum computer with 10000 physical qubits (= one physical or logical qubit takes only 0 or 1 value ) by 2026 ( this or this-last-paragraph ).
↑ Now in 2026, QuEra still has only 448 impractical error-prone atomic qubits ( this or this-Verified-logical qubit, this-QuEra ) instead of the exaggerated 10000 fault-tolerant qubits, which are still far from millions qubits required for a practical quantum computer (= never happen ).
So QuEra moved the goalposts and repeated the outright same lie that they would achieve the 1st fault-tolerant quantum computer called Libra with 10000 physical qubits in 2028 ( this or this-5th~8th-paragraphs ).
↑ These repeated lies about science by academia, top universities and corporations clearly show the current mainstream physics = quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity is false ↓
Nvidia tried to guess and fix errors of today's useless noisy quantum computers by classical computer's (overhyped) AI training called decoders, which can Not fix the quantum computer's errors.
↑ Relying on classical computers for error correction means there is No quantum computer advantage nor speed-up ( this or this-lower-Key-challenges remain ).
This or this-3rd-last-paragraph says -- AI cannot fix quantum computers
"However, practical, large-scale quantum systems still face hardware scaling, coherence, and cost challenges. As Bloomberg Intelligence noted, these (classical computer's) software advances can move timelines, but they do not eliminate the fundamental engineering gaps that remain."
This or this-4th-last-paragraph says -- Quantum computer impractical forever
" the deployment of practical, large-scale quantum computing remains a long way off,"
This or this-1st-paragraph (9/2026) says -- No error correction
"This does not mean a practical-scale fault-tolerant quantum computer has been built"
Feel free to link to this site.
