QED is wrong, unable to predict anomalous magnetic moment by its fake trick.

Home page
Calculation of QED g-factor.
Einstein relativity is false.

QED always gives useless infinities which must be illegitimately removed by renormalization based on illusory infinite bare mass and charge.

(Fig.1)  A electron's bare charge and mass must be infinite to cancel QED meaningless infinities and artificially get finite g-2 (= anomalous magnetic moment ) values.

(Fig.2)  QED renormalization just illegitimately removes infinities.

QED is useless, unreal, always giving infinities by its unreal virtual particles.

Contrary to the media-hype, quantum electrodynamics (= QED ) is an unsuccessful, unreal, useless theory.

Relativistic QED says the vacuum is filled with unphysical virtual photons with imaginary mass, which paradoxically disobey Einstein relativistic mass-energy relation, to mediate electromagnetic force ( this-p.3 ).

These infinite (unreal) virtual particles make all QED calculations give meaningless infinities ( this-3rd-paragraph,  this-3rd-paragraph ).

QED useless infinities must be artificially removed by illegitimate renormalization, which invalidates QED.

↑ These QED meaningless infinities must be artificially removed by the illegitimate math trick called renormalization to get some finite values of electron's anomalous magnetic moment (= g-2-factor ) and Lamb shift.

This QED renormalization artificially removing infinities to illegitimately get some desired finite values is harshly criticized even by founders such as Dirac and Feynman as "hocus-pocus" or "dippy process ( this-A. Historical introduction,  this-1st-paragraph )".

Infinity - infinity = arbitrary finite value. = QED

This-p.1-right-2.2~p.2-left says
"Unfortunately, QFT (= quantum field theory or QED ) was a complete failure since any attempted calculation under this theory resulted in an (meaningless) infinite number"

"Separation: separating an infinite series into two components, one that diverges to infinity and another that converges to a finite value. Eventually, the infinite component is ignored and only the finite part (= anomalous magnetic moment ) remains"  ← QED is a wrong math.

This-1st-paragraph says
"trick of theoretical physicists in sweeping infinities under the rug using what is called renormalization.  Roughly speaking, renormalization solves the infinity problem by adding a negative (arbitrary) infinity to the positive infinity to cancel it out"  ← Not a QED prediction.

This-p.3 (or p.1-introduction)-2nd-paragraph says
"if we would be able to arrange the infinities of the bare quantities and the infinities coming from the divergent integrals to cancel each other systematically, we would be left with a finite (= artificial trick )"

QED needs unreal infinite bare charge and mass of an electron (= free parameters, Not QED prediction ) to cancel infinite virtual particles by illegitimate renormalization.

According to the unphysical QED, the bare charge and mass of an electron must be unrealistically infinite to cancel the infinities caused by infinite virtual particles ( this-p.3-5,  this-middle,  this-p.19-3rd-paragraph,  this-middle,  this-p.53 ).

This QED's illegitimate removal of infinities by artificially redefining fictitious mass and change is call "mass or charge renormalization ( this-p.2 )".

This-3rd-4th-paragraphs say
"Renormalisation refers to a term's ( artificial ) redefinition based on mathematical properties, which help eliminate infinity. A fundamental concept here is separating infinite from measurable finite physical variables. It is done by adding counter terms to the original Lagrangian of a given theory."

"The electron’s observed mass and charge are not the "bare" mass and charge in the original Lagrangian. They are "renormalised" values that take into account quantum corrections (= free parameters, so Not QED prediction ). The renormalisation method modifies these constants to fit experimental results, hence removing the infinite values."

This-p.18-last says
"In analogy to the mass renormalization, this infinity is absorbed into a redefinition (= artificial manipulation ) of the electric charge — charge renormalization ( this-p.2 )"

This QED math based on infinity minus another infinity giving some finite physical values is clearly wrong and illegitimate.

↑ According to legitimate math, "infinity minus infinity" becomes a "uncertain indeterminate number" that cannot determine some physical values, so QED renormalization artificially removing infinities is Not a right math.

QED is useless, unable to predict anything.

Not only the electron's anomalous magnetic moment but also tiny Lamb shift in QED is also an artificial illegitimate manipulation irrelevant to QED prediction as this-p.3-left-6th-paragraph says
" His calculation (= of Lamb shift ) included this value that we suspect that was entered ad hoc to match the theoretical value with the experimental value. In the field of physics, this trick is known as a 'fudge factor'."

If QED was really successful or useful, almost everybody should have already known how to calculate the anomalous magnetic moment by such a (wrongly) successful QED.  ← But actually, ordinary people (even physicists) do Not know any QED (meaningless) calculation methods based on (unreal) virtual particles ( this-p.5-right-1st-paragraph, p.6-(22) ), which fact shows QED is useless, unreal.

(Fig.3)  QED unreal virtual electrons and photons are expressed as unphysical math relations called propagators that are used as a tool to artificially manipulate anomalous magnetic moment value.

QED just manipulates unphysical math called (virtual particle) propagators to illegitimately get anomalous magnetic moment.

The (unphysical) QED is rather simple, consisting only of illusory virtual electrons and photons with energies (or momentums ) from minus infinity to plus infinity, which QED unphysical calculations always diverge to meaningless infinities by integration ( this-p.8-upper,  this-p.68(or p.64),  this-p.6 ).

In the unphysical QED rule based on abstract Feynman diagram relating (illusory) photons to electrons, these virtual electrons (= S_F ) and virtual photons (= D_F ) are expressed as unphysical math relations called propagators of (illusory, virtual) photons ( this-p.2-4,  this-p.2-3 ) and fermions (= virtual electrons,  this-p.9-10,  this-p.2 ).

Here "p" represents a (virtual) particle's relativistic momentum and energy,  κ represents the electron's mass,  λ represents the photon's mass (= this λ should be close to zero ).

These virtual photons and electrons are known to disobey Einstein relativistic energy-mass relation ( this-p.9-10,  this p.6 ), disproving relativistic QED,

QED is bad, just artificially manipulating electron's anomalous magnetic moment's value by wrong math artificially removing unneeded parts, which is Not prediction.

(Fig.4)  QED just artificially changes equations and removes the unneeded part by illegitimate renormalization to get finite anomalous magnetic moment.

QED uses wrong math to artificially fit the calculated electron's anomalous magnetic moment value to the experimental value.

Fig.4 is part of electron's anomalous magnetic moment (= g-factor ) allegedly caused by the unreal virtual photons and electrons ( this p.9-10,  this-p.6-8 ) in the two-loop or fourth-order correction calculated by Karplus and Kroll in 1950 ( this p.24,  this-p.10-11 ).

The first calculation (of one loop correction of anomalous magnetic moment ) by Schwinger no longer agreed with the new experimental result, so Karplus and Kroll tried to artificially fit the newly-calculated two-loop correction (= fourth-order ) of anomalous magnetic moment with the new experimental value.

↑ Later, after the newer experimental result of the anomalous magnetic moment turned out to disagree also with the new Karplus, Kroll's calculated results, they started to say their (artificial) calculations of Fig.5 might be wrong (= Fig.4 calculation remained as a right one ).

↑ This infamous unscientific story showed QED is just an illegitimate math trick artificially fitting calculations with new experimental results ( this-p.5-right-6.1~ p.6 ), each time the previous artificial QED calculated values turned out to disagree with the new experimental values.

Artificially change the equation by wrong math → remove only the unneeded part by renormalization, which is Not QED prediction.

This Karplus and Kroll's paper ( p.2-Fig.1-IId, p.5-right~lower,p.7, p.10-M^IId, p.12,14-μ^IId ) explains the detail of Fig.4's calculation of part of anomalous magnetic moment based on (unreal) virtual photons and electrons.

In this artificial calculation process of the anomalous magnetic moment's two-loop correction, they deliberately used a wrong math in calculating this-p.6-equations (21) and (22) (= this (21) is Not equal to (22) as shown in Fig.4-artificial illegitimate change, contrary to the paper's claim, without some unspecified artificial new rules ).

↑ After this wrong math illegitimately changing the equation, only one term of this artificial equation-(22) in p.6 (= Fig.4's equation surrounded by the square ) was used as part of anomalous magnetic moment in M^IId in this-p.10, and all other parts (= including divergent and non-divergent parts ) were artificially removed by the illegitimate renormalization based on illusory infinite bare charge or mass.

QED trick of artificially removing the unneeded infinite and finite numbers by illegitimate renormalization through unreal infinite bare mass and charge.

↑ This-p.7-left-2nd-paragraph (of this two-loop anomalous magnetic moment calculation ) says
"The fact that B is infinite,.. it can be interpreted as a charge renormalization (= the first part of I was artificially removed by using the unreal infinite bare charge )"

This-p.6-(22) says
"The first term... and is therefore canceled by the (illegitimate) mass renormalization"

↑ As a result, QED artificially removed only the unneeded infinite and finite terms by illegitimate renormalization based on unreal infinite bare mass and charge to leave only the part surrounded by the square ( compare this-p.6-(22)(23) and p.10-lower-M^IId ), which is Not a prediction.

QED is an unsuccessful illegitimate math trick unable to predict the anomalous magnetic moment (and Lamb shift ), contrary to hypes.

QED just artificially separates the unneeded and the needed parts by illegitimate change of variables and ad-hoc renormalization, which is Not prediction.

(Fig.5)  QED math trick: artificial change of variables → remove only the unneeded part by renormalization, which is Not prediction.

Change of variables → artificially separate, remove the unneeded part by renormalization.  = QED illegitimate math trick

Fig.5 is QED artificial math trick in another part of electron's anomalous magnetic moment's two-loop correction ( this-p.2-Fig.1-IIc, p.8, p.9-upper, p.10-M^IIc, p.14-μ^IIc ).

This-p.8-(29) conducted the artificial change of variables, and then separated, removed only the unneeded part of B in the final anomalous magnetic moment part of M^IIc in p.10.

This-p.9-2nd-paragraph says
"Here again the separation of the renormalization term B has made the physically significant correction divergent ( this-p.2-3rd-paragraph )"

↑ This Karplus, Kroll (artificial) calculation of electron's anomalous magnetic moment's two-loop (= fourth-order ) correction almost agreed with the experiment at first.

But later, after a newer experimental result turned out to disagree with this Karplus, Kroll's calculation, they started to say there might be some calculation mistake, and artificially changed (= manipulated ) the calculated result, which is illegitimate, Not a QED prediction at all ( this-p.5-6.1-p.6 ).

After Petermann's new (unpublished) calculation, Fig.5 calculated result (= μ_IIc ) was artificially changed, and Fig.4 result (= μ_IId based on wrong math disproving QED's anomalous magnetic moment ) remained, unchanged ( compare this-p.2 and this-p.14 ).

This artificial two-loop correction of anomalous magnetic moment uses new ad-hoc rules inconsistent with the one-loop correction, so QED cannot predict the anomalous magnetic moment.

This unphysical too-loop correction artificially leaves the terms proportional to γ^μ or γ^ν as part of anomalous magnetic moment (= new artificial L surrounded by the square, this-p.8-(32), p.9-(33), p.10-M^IIc includes γ_μ (= γ^μ ) or γ_ν terms as part of anomalous magnetic moment ), which ad-hoc new rule is inconsistent with the one-loop correction removing all γ^μ terms.

↑ It means QED just artificially separating and removing the unneeded part by illegitimate renormalization is unable to predict any physical values such as anomalous magnetic moment.

(Fig.6)  QED depends on illegitimate change of variables and renormalization of infinities to artificially generate some finite physical values.

QED unphysical math trick = change of variables, artificially separate, remove only an unneeded part.

Contrary to the hypes, QED calculation is unsuccessful, wrong, giving only meaningless infinities.

QED often uses the artificial math trick of change of variables.

↑ "Change of variables" itself originally should not change the results themselves, which is Not the case of QED that artificially separates and removes the unneeded part artificially.

In order to obtain the desired anomalous magnetic moment value, QED artificially separates and removes only the unneeded part by the illegitimate renormalization ( this-p.6-1st-paragraph, p.7-left-2nd-paragraph, p.8-(29). p.9,  this-p.26-A.28 ).

So by combining the change of variables with the illegitimate renormalization, QED can artificially manipulate the finite results as free parameters, which shows QED is unsuccessful with No ability to predict any physical values.

Artificial coefficient manipulation of anomalous magnetic moment.

This-p.9-last-M^I alone has the unknown additional coefficent of π².

This-p.8-last-(-α/2π) of L is artificially eliminated in this-p.9,p.10-M^IIa.

This-p.4-right-footnote says different physicists used different definition or different coefficient values, which is Not QED prediction.

Artificial separation of infinities due to zero photon mass λ

This-p.12-(56)(57), p.14 shows all infinite terms of 1/2lnλ²/κ² (= photon mass λ → 0 ) have unnaturally the same simple coefficeint of 1/2 to artificial cancel each other's infinities, though other coefficients are complicated and different values.

Even after the alleged correction of calculation mistake ( this-p.2-μ_IIc ), only the infinity part of 1/2log λ²/m² had the unchanged simple coefficient 1/2, while other coefficients changed.  ← This is unnatural.

↑ This shows they artificially adjusted and separated the original infinity into the infinity (= the same 1/2lnλ²/κ² to calcel each other ) and finite parts (= infinite part can absorb arbitrary unneeded finite numbers, which is artificial manipulation of anomalous magnetic moment ), which is Not prediction.

(Fig.7)  QED artificial change of variable and renormalization removing infinity is the illegitimate math trick irrelevant to real physical phenomena.

QED's artificial transformation of variables and removal of the unneeded part is Not a legitimate prediction.

Another two loop QED correction of anomalous magnetic moment used the artificial illegitimate math trick.

Fig.7 case is part of anomalous magnetic moment originating from the unreal virtual photon (= expressed just as unphysical math propagator ) splits into two (unreal) virtual electrons-3 and 4 ( this-p.2-right-Fig.1-IIe. p.4-second-order functions, p.5-(13), p.9-M^IIe, p.10-M^IIe, p.11,p.14-M^IIe, μ^IIe ).

To obtain the unphysical equation of this-p.4-(12), they used artificial change of variables and transformation that is irrelevant to prediction of real physical phenomena.

↑ This-paper explained this artificial transformation expressing virtual electrons-3,4's energies and moments as k' k'', virtual photon as k. ↓

This-p.25-(A.13)(A.14)-p.26-(A.27)(A.28)-artificial change of variables and transformation, (A.32)-artificial partial integration with respect to artificial new variable of v, they artificially separated infinite divergent term from finite terms artificially created by the change of variables into v. p.27-(A.35).

This-p.5-left-(13) says "This infinite constant, however, has no observable consequence", which unneeded part was illegitimately removed by renormalization.

Compare this-p.4-(12) and p.10-last-M^IIe where the unneeded infinite or finite parts were artificially removed by illegitimate renormalization.

As a result, QED just manipulating anomalous magnetic moment value by illegitimate change of variables ( this-p.26-(A.28) ) and renormalization ( this-p.5-(13) ) can Not predict any physical values, contrary to hypes.

Feel free to link to this site.