Home page
Quasiparticle is unreal
(Fig.1) Quantum mechanics is useless, just trying to describe some material's magnetization as an electron splitting into three unreal quasiparticle models of spinon (= spin ? ), holon (= charge ? ), orbiton (= orbit ) ?
Quantum mechanics is useless, unable to describe multi-electron phenomena, so it has to rely on various fictional quasiparticle models with fake mass and charge to approximately express multi-particle physical phenomena.
↑ Quantum mechanics relying on fictional quasiparticle model means the quantum mechanics can Not clarify the real detailed physical mechanism of material by real electron or atomic model, hence hampers technology.
Quantum mechanics ridiculously claims that a single electron, which must be indivisible ( this p.2 ), could split into spin expressed as fictitious spinon quasiparticle and charge expressed as fictitious holon quasiparticle through unrealistic process called "spin-charge separation" ( this p.3-15 ).
↑ Of course, a real electron can Not be divided, so this quantum mechanical spinon quasiparticle model is unreal and paradoxical, hence impractical forever, but physicists still try to continue to publish papers on these fictional quasiparticle model in vain.
These fictional spin-charge separated quasiparticles mean a hole after an electron is kicked out by light moves in one direction, and the material's magnetization (= by electron's orbit, Not spin ) moves in different direction ( this-right ), which is estimated by X-ray scattering image (= Not by directly seeing the unreal spinon quasiparticle, this-2nd-last-paragraph ) .
↑ It is Not an electron really splitting into (fictional) spin and charge quasiparticles.
Quantum mechanical also claims an indivisible electron could split into three quasiparticles of spinon (= spin ), holon (= charge ), and orbiton (= orbit ).
↑ This orbiton just means some excited electron's state (= this excited energy state moving in different direction from the material's magnetization, this-left, this 11~13th-paragraphs ), and does Not mean an electron really splits into three (fictional) quasiparticles.
Because quasiparticles are Not real particles.
The 1st and last paragraphs of this overhyped news says
"While using X-rays... observed an electron splitting into two new particles, the spinon (= unreal quasiparticle ), and the orbiton."
"understanding the way electrons decay into other types of particles in these systems might offer new pathways toward improving our theoretical understanding of high-temperature superconductivity." ← overhyped fake news.
↑ This research paper's abstract says nothing about any practical use such as high-temperature superconductors (= so quantum mechanics or spinon quasiparticle model has No practical use ), contrary to the above overhyped news (= which lied ).
The last paragraph of another overhyped news about the fictional spinon quasiparticle (5/13/2024) also says
"Therefore, investigating the spectral signals arising from spinons obeying the Dirac equation would provide a broader understanding... toward its broader applications, including the exploration of high-temperature superconductivity and quantum information."
↑ This-research paper's abstract says nothing about any practical use such as high-temperature superconductor nor quantum information, contrary to the above hyped news (= which lied ).
The 1st~2nd paragraphs of this overhyped news (5/14/2025) also baselessly say
"with potential (= just speculation, still useless ) applications in insulator-based AF spintronics."
"known as spinons (= fictional quasiparticle )"
↑ This research paper-p.1-abstract says nothing about the detailed practical application, contrary to the above hyped news headline.
↑ This research paper on fictional spinon-charge-orbiton quasiparticles ( this ↓)
p.7-8 quantum mechanics can only express these (fictional) spin or spinon quasiparticles as nonphysical math operators or very old impractical model such as Heisenberg spin (= S ) model with No actual atomic shapes.
p.17-left-a shows the electron excited by light (= orbiton ? ) moved to the right, and the magnetization (= spinon ) moved to the left (= imagined by X-Ray, Not by directly seeing fictional spin or quasiparticles ). ← This does Not show an electron actually split into spin, charge and orbit.
p.21 chose adjustable parameters and artificial spin model (= No quantum mechanical prediction, this-p.5.p.7.p.8--left-2. ).
This-p.7(or p.6)-3rd-paragraph says
"We
first considered the Heisenberg model without disorder. By tuning the values of J1, J2, and Jh" ← Just artificially adjusting free parameters J without quantum mechanical prediction.
Feel free to link to this site.
