(Fig.1) How does quantum mechanics describe solid physics ?
In fact, all people in the world are deceived into believing the present quantum mechanics is useful for the latest technology by the media.
This is a big lie to keep dirty vested interests and exorbitant tuition.
OK, then, how the present quantum mechanics describes the actual phenomena ?
Condensed matter physics by quantum mechanics is filled with unreal quasiparticles, so completely useless and waste of time !
(Fig.2) An electron is a meaningless "letter" in quantum mechanics.
Suprisingly, the present quantum mechanics can show only a nonphysical letter (= c†, c ) as an electron. That's all it can do, so useless.
The is the reason the quantum mechanics is useless, just pursues "fantasy".
(Fig.3) Quantum mechanics can do only this ↓ in each electron !
Probably almost no ordinary people know the present physics is useless.
All quantum mechanics can do is two simple actions in each particle.
An electron can only be created (= c† ) or annihilated (= c ) by quantum mechanics. That's all.
As you feel, it's impossible to describe actual complicated and dynamical physical phenomena using only these "too simple" actions !
So if physicists try to describe more complicated phenomena, all they can do is fabricate artificial quasiparticle, which doesn't really exist.
(Fig.4) Quasiparticle = trick with nonphysical symbols.
A recent top journal still deals with unreal quasiparticle, exciton
This "exciton" is Not a real particle, but a quasiparticle.
Quasiparticle "exciton" is just a pair of electron (= c† ) and its hole (= β† ).
NO physical shape in this nonphysical symbol.
Polariton is also unreal quasiparticle. Polariton consists of a pair of exciton and photon ( this (15) , this (12) ). That's all. It's not a modern physics !
In this way, all the present physics can do is make artificial quasiparticles ( this, this ). So useless. People are deceived, because universities hide this truth !
As a result, almost No ordinary people know the present solid physics is filled with unreal "quasiparticle" and does harm to all applied science.
(Fig.5) "Electron oscillation" generates unreal "phonon" particles ?
You can often see "phonon" in various news of journal and universities even now. What the heck does this "phonon" mean ?
In fact, this phonon is Not an actual particle such as electron and proton.
When an electron is vibrating, they try to describe that state using phonon.
How do physicists create this artificial phonon particle ?
Phonon quasiparticle consists of electron's dislocation and momentum.
So this phonon just means "each electron's behavior", not an independent particle. It's a very strange concept.
(Fig.6) Phonon remain unreal, forever.
Phonon is fictitious quasi particle, which does Not really exist. It means quantum mechanics pursues unreal particles in sold physics.
In "real" science, we must try to descibe all physical phenomena using "real" particles. But quantum mechanics has given up it !
They stop pursuing deeper truth, after fabricating artificial quasiparticles. This attitude completely violates the purpose of the science.
This is the reason the present physics and all applied science have stopped their progress, and universities remain useless.
(Fig.7) ↓ This is the reason why "phonon" is fiction.
Quantum mechanics claims phonon is related to other particles' vibration. This logic is irrational and crazy !
It means when an atom ( or electron ) starts to oscillate, then phonons are created, if the oscillation stops, phonons disappear.
Thinking commonsensically, this ridiculous particle does NOT exist in our real world. But quantum mechanics depends on it !
It's surprising that even Nobel prize accepted this strange phonon.
(Fig.8) They just put nonphysical symbols side by side.
How does quantum mechanics decribe interaction between phonon and other electrons ? In fact, quantum mechanics can do nothing about it !
All they can do is put nonphysical letters side by side as the interaction, where neighboring electron (= c† ) and phonon (= b† ) interact with each other ?
So quantum mechanics has No ability to describe actual, more complicated phenomena than these abstract math symbols ( this p.9 ).
Furthermore, the phonons interacting with electrons are "virtual phonon", Not a "real phonon" ( this p.7 ).
So condensed matter physics based on quasiparticle is incoherent, illogical, and there is no way it can be accepeted like radiation.
(Fig.9) ↓ Bogoliubov quasiparticle = create + annihilate electron ?
Even in superconductor, quantum mechanics depends on unreal Bogoliubov quasiparticle, which doesn't really exist.
How is this fictitous Bogoliubov quasiparticle created ?
They say this quasiparticle consists of creation and annihilation of an electron.
It means Bogoliubov is a mixture of an electron appearing and disappearing ? Then the total becomes "zero particle" ( this p.4 ) ? Very strange.
This is the reason why this irrational quasiparticle cannot be called "real particle". Of course, useless.
This unreal Bogoliubov quasiparticle is used in fictional Hawking radiation.
(Fig.10) ↓ Quantum mechanics cannot describe actual superconductor.
Then how does quantum mechanics apply these unreal quasiparticles to actual superconductor ?
To apply fictional particles, they have to define artificial equation, first.
Each electron can be expressed as only "create" and "annihilate" operators.
So the basic procedure of useless quantum mechanics is,
① Choose artificial equation → ② Replace it by unreal quasiparticle.
All these equation and quasiparticle transformation are artificially made, Not representing the actual nature ( this p.19 ).
We must quit meaningless math trick immediately and aim to describe actual phenomena using only "real concepts" for making the present physics useful.
(Fig.11) Fractional quantum Hall effect is due to fractional-charge anyon ?
When applying electromagnetic fields to some semiconductors, the electric conductance (= 1/resistance ) appears to be quantized.
After physicists defined the theory of this quantum Hall effect, they realized this theory cannot explain more complicated conductance.
So they created illogical concepts such as fractional-charge, anyon.
The point is this anyon is Not real, but a fictitious
quasiparticle.
We have neither observed nor isolated these fictional particles.
But quantum mechanics cannot describe physical facts without unreal quasiparticle !
Because quantum mechanics is too abstract and too inflexible to handle complex phenonema.
We need to use more realistic model to describe actual facts without nonsense quasiparticle.
(Fig.12) But they mistake "ejected electron" for unreal quasiparticle.
Recently, massless Dirac fermion is a hot topic in solid physics. But this particle is unreal quasiparticle, again.
When illuminating some material ( ex. topological insulator or graphite ), an electron is ejected by photoelectric effect.
After measuring the energy, momentum of the ejected electron, they jumped to the wrong conclusion that massless Dirac quasiparticle existed inside material.
So they cannot observe this fictitious Dirac quasiparticle, they just detect only the ejected electron.
(Fig.13) Quasiparticle contradicts basic physical principle.
How fast is this massless (= zero mass ) Dirac fermion moving ?
Einstein relativity claims massless particle always moves at light speed c.
But they say this massless Dirac quasiparticle moves slower than the light speed, 0.3 percent of c ( this p.4 ).
This Dirac quasiparticle contradicts Einstein relativity, so unreal.
Furthermore, it depends on pseudo-spin.
(Fig.14) Measuring photoelectron → "massless" electron ?
This massless Dirac fermion is slower than the light speed, which violates relativity. They claim this massless fermion was observed by photoemission using this.
"Photoemission" means observing ejected " electron" with mass, but they misinterpret it as "massless". So this "massless fermion" is self-contradictory.
They measured the energy and momentum of the electron ejected by photon (= light ), and speculate that this electron behaves like "massless" inside material.
They believe that parallel component of the electron's momentum (= hk ) remains the same inside and outside of material. This is just wrong.
In photoelectric effect, photon's momentum cannot be transferred to electron, because photon and electron have different masses.
We have to consider the whole atom. So this interpretation of experiment (= ARPES ) is theoretically wrong, and massless Dirac quasiparticle is illusion.
(Fig.15) Quantum mechanics depends on unreal quasiparticle.
Mojorana fermion is a hypothetical particle which has the same form of particle and antiparticle.
In condensed matter physics, Majorana fermion is just a quasiparticle, which does Not really exist, again.
This fictitious Majorana quasiparticle is made from electron's creation and annihilation symbols.
(Fig.16) Majorana quasiparticle was observed in superconductor ?
They claim this Majorana quasiparticle can be detected in special superconducting wire. Of course, unreal quasiparticle itself cannot be seen.
In Fig.16, they put normal (= red ) and superconducting (= purple ) materials on some wire. On this borderline, they detected complex electric conductance.
So they just measured complex "electric conductance", and interpreted it as fictional "Majorana" quasiparticle ( this p.3 ) That's all.
Fictitious quasiparticle itself can neither be isolated nor confirmed.
This (mis)interpretation is based on some artificial definition.
(Fig.17) ↓ Artificial definition of Majorana quasiparticle.
How is this Majorana quasiparticle made ? Quantum mechanics can use only two nonphysical symbols as an electron.
So all they can do is combine these two types of abstract electron's operators to make artificial Majorana quasiparticle.
They claim Majorana fermion consists of a pair of electron's creation (= c† ) and annihilation (= c ). This means the total is zero (= create + annihilate ) ?
This strange form is the reason why Majorana fermion cannot be called "real particle" instead of quasiparticle ( this p.4 ).
(Fig.18) ↓ But this antiparticle is NOT a real one !
Majorana fermion is said to be equal to its own antiparticle.
Then does this Majorana quasiparticle have the same form as its antiparticle ?
To begin from conclusion, neither antiparticle nor particle in Majorana quasiparticle is real.
They just suppose putting the mark "†" exchanges particle and antiparticle in quasiparticle. This is just an artificial definition, Not meaning the real nature ( this p.3 ).
When Majorana condsists of electron's creation and annihilation operators, putting the mark "†" to it gives the same form as the original.
This is NOT a real antiparticle, but "fake" antiparticle.
(Fig.19) ↓ Why can these nonphysical symbols be useful ? Nonsense.
It is often said that this Majorana quasiparticle may be useful for quantum computation. But unreal quasiparticle cannot be isolated !
In fact, this logic ( Majorana = quantum computer ? ) is nonsense.
Atomic Majorana model is just a collection of nonphysical symbols.
Electron in quantum mechanics is just an abstract letter.
And they defined Pauli exclusion principle as anticommutation of them.
In quantum mechanics, "creation+ annihilation" (= c†c) denotes each particle's number. This is just a definition with No physical meaning.
Strange to say, the total number of Majorana fermion must be always "1" and it can neither increase nor decrease ( this p.6 ).
The electron's number (= energy ) consists of two Majorana in different places (= a, b ). This means Majorana is immune to any error ? ( this p.3 ).
But all these logics are based on artificial definition of Majorana quasiparticle, which doesn't represent truth ( this p.5 ).
(Fig.20) Physicists need imaginary target = quantum computer.
All roads lead to quantum computer, which is often exploited as "camouflage" target in unreal quasiparticles.
First, quantum computer based on ridiculous "parallel worlds" is just a scam.
Many people, corporations and governments are deceived into wasting their money in fiction.
(Fig.21) ↓ Spin model is broken at room temperature !
Quantum mechanics claims that (anti)ferromagnetism is caused by electron spin. But this is a big lie.
The magnetic energy by electron spin is too weak to cause ferromagnet.
Spin-spin interaction is easily broken at low temperature ( ~ 0.3 K ).
But actual iron can keep ferromagnetic at as 1043 K ( this p.8 ).
In fact, electron's spin disagrees with many experimental results !
"Spin" is used only as a "mark" with No physical meaning.
So we must give up contradictory spin model to investigate further mechanism !
It's natural to think that ferromagnet is maintained stably by Coulomb interaction among electrons' orbits ( not spin ! )
(Fig.22) Spin magnet is too weak to explain ferromagnet.
You may think Spintronics and excitonics are useful (← ? ) for your career.
But almost nobody knows electron spin lacks reality !
Its spinning far exceeds
light speed ( see this p.2 ).
You may hear spin is tiny magnet with the magnitude of Bohr magneton.
But this is not true, and disagrees with experiment.
Spin-spin magnetic interaction is too weak to explain actual ferromagnet. See this p.6 this p.7. Spin can be replaced by more realistic model.
Then, what the heck does this spin model mean ?
It uses "Heisenberg" spin model ( this p.3 ).
But this Heisenberg spin model is too old, which was introduced in 1920s, and it's too abstract to describe actual phenomena ( this p.2 ).
This spin model just puts nonphysical symbols side by side. So useless.
Parameter J is arbitrarily chosen. J > 0 = antiferromagnet, J < 0 = ferromagnet.
(Fig.23) ↓ Electron mass becomes much smaller inside solids !?
Quantum mechanics can only show each as electron as abstract symbol. Then how can they describe more complicated phenomena ?
Surprisingly, they introduced unrealistic concepts such as "effective mass" in materials to explain various phenomena.
This "effective mass" lacks reality like above quasiparticle, because that mass can be negative ! See various effective mass smaller than electron's mass ( this p.9 ).
The Science paper showing Majorana quasiparticle uses unreal effective mass of (= 0.015 me, me is true electron's mass, this p.3 ) !
(Fig.24) ↓ Quantum mechanics cannot describe real phenomena.
Actual materials contain almost infinite atoms and electrons.
So it's impossible to express those materials only by abstract symbols.
This is the reason why quantum mechanics discards real physical concepts. Instead, it relies on "fake" concepts such as "quasiparticle" and "effective mass".
In fact, all other g-factor and spin-orbit are fake. Effective mass, g-factor, spin-orbit constant are all "unreal" ( this p.3 and this p.8 ).
(Fig.25) Because its magnitude disagrees with experiments !
You may often see the word "spin-orbit" in various news.
But in fact, this "spin-orbit" does NOT mean real spin-orbit.
So they are "fake" spin-orbit interaction.
(Fig.26) Einstein relativity changes electric field into magnetic ?
Quantum mechanics claims that spin-orbit interaction represents Einstein relativistic effect. Suppose an electron spin is moving through electric field.
In this moving electron's frame, the electric field transforms into magnetic field, which causes spin-orbit magnetic interaction ( this p.7 ).
In fact, this Einstein electromagnetism includes fatal paradoxes, so the concept of "spin-orbit" is just wrong.
We can get spin-orbit coupling constant in case of original relativistic effect. This spin-orbit interaction by Einstein relativity is too small to be useful.
(Fig.27) Because it's by six orders magnitude stronger than relativity !
Surprisingly, quantum mechanics replaced the original meaning of "spin-orbit" by the "fake" one which has nothing to do with Einstein relativity.
In semiconductor such as GaAs, this spin-orbit coupling is by six orders of magnitude stronger and has the opposite sign ( this p.2 left ) !
They introduced an artificial spin-orbit model and equation, which is completely different from Einstein relativity ( this p.7 and this p.7 ).
Other semiconductors such as InAs (= 117 ) has much stronger spin-orbit interaction than Einstein's prediction (= 10-6 ). See this p.131.
As a result, all quantum mechanical concepts such as spin, spin-orbit and mass are unreal and fake, have nothing to do with actual phenomena !
(Fig.28) We must use experimental data to predict "real concept" !
In the present quantum mechanics, even when we get some new experimental data, we cannot use them to clarify real mechanisms !
Instead, quantum mechanics forces us to use these data to create artificial quasiparticle, effective mass .. So our science stops its progress.
This is a very serious problem. We must address it immediately not to increase more educational victims under false science.
2016/3/18 updated. Feel free to link to this site.