(Fig.1) Quantum mechanics chooses fake potential and solution. ← useless
All the current molecular simulating methods are useless.
We already have technology to manipulate each single atom, measuring its force using microscope.
Using these technology, we could have already clarified human body and cured any diseases. But many diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer are still incurable.
Because old quantum mechanical model spoils these excellent technology.
Using atomic force microscope (= AFM ), we can measure a precise force in each single atom. From these atomic 'force' data, we should have prepared some atomic model (= simpler model is better ) to move forward to manipulate multi-atomic molecules.
The problem is old quantum mechanics has No concept of 'force'.
Without 'force', it is impossible to predict which direction each atom will move in chemical reaction.
So quantum mechanics is useless in predicting molecular reactions !
Why did quantum mechanics dismiss 'force' required to predict reactions ?
In 1920s when quantum mechanics was born, there were No modern computers. So physicists could Not describe three-body helium using real atomic model.
They had no choice but to accept quantum mechanical unreal picture.
Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics cannot solve three-body helium atom, either.
So quantum mechanics resorted to nonphysical, dishonest methods.
They just choose fake trial solution for unsolvable helium atom.
These fake (= trial ) solution can be chosen from infinite choices with freely-adjustable parameters, so quantum mechanics cannot predict atomic behavior.
After choosing fake solution, physicists just integrate it instead of solving it, so this method is meaningless. Infinite choices and parameters mean each calculation takes infinite time to find the lowest-energy (fake) solution. ← impossible.
Quantum interpretation of microscopic measurement has to rely on unreal model such as quasiparticle or fake pseudo-potential.
So there is No concept of 'force' in quantum mechanics which just gives 'fake energy (= Not force )' gotten by integrating fake solution and pseudo-potential.
Quantum calculation in atomic force microscopy uses density functional theory (= DFT, this p.2 ) which is worse and more dishonest than Schrödinger equation.
In DFT, we have to choose "fake potential (= exchange-correlation functional )" besides fake solution, so DFT cannot predict any atomic behavior, = useless, too.
Each time this fake potential (= functional ) fails to give good results in different atomic cases, they have to find new artificial (= fake ) potential, so this DFT theory is meaningless ( this p.17 ).
Quantum mechanics abandoned 'forces', they just choose pseudo-potential and fake solution. Pauli repulsion is Not admitted as real force ( this p.6 ) but as nonphysical, unknown antisymmetric math (= integral cannot calculate force but just nonphysical exchange energy ).
To get real atomic "forces", we have to prepare real electrons avoiding each other, and atomic size (= orbital radius ) based on real de Broglie waves.
But quantum mechanics giving up real atomic picture cannot prepare real moving electrons. It also tacitly uses de Broglie wave in hydrogen, but unsolvable Schrödinger's helium makes de Broglie wave meaningless.
Other methods such as molecular mechanics do Not use real electrons, either. It treats different atomic bonds as different 'classical springs' with fake force model ( this p.2 ) and freely-adjustable parameters , which cannot predict new chemical reaction ( this p.2 ).
The only way to explain multi-electron molecules is to use "real moving electrons" in atomic orbits designated by its real de Broglie wave which interference can precisely describe Pauli principle as 'real force'.
This latest molecular simulation is useless, too, which uses artificial potential model based on DFT ( this p.2 right upper ) ← Quantum DFT itself is meaningless, so this artificial model based on it is meaningless, too.
'Machine-learning' in quantum mechanics is just one of 'approximate ways' to choose artifical models and parameters from infinite choices, so if quantum mechanics is useless, it is useless, too. = Just "PR stunt" like AI.
(Fig.2) ↓ Useless quantum mechanics stops science.
Quantum mechanics, which was invented 100 years ago, cannot deal with multi-electron atoms, so it has to rely on fictitious model with unreal quasiparticles with fake mass and charge.
Phonon is unreal quasiparticle expressing some "vibration".
This study also tries to use unreal quasiparticle to explain neutron-scattering results of some material.
Weyl fermion is unreal quasiparticle, too. None of these research realized something useful for us, so meaningless research.
As long as physicists stick to fake quasiparticle model in quantum mechanics, we make No progress in science.
(Fig.3) ↓ The media uses misleading phrases to deceive laypersons.
Quantum mechanics is useless, so it needs to create "imaginary target = quantum computer" to deceive taxpayers and governments.
No progress in research on fictional quantum computer, which is said to be faster (← No proof ! ) using parallel-world computing.
If you carefully read each quantum technology news, you will notice they make No progress, just using misleading phrases to get your hopes up.
The first paragraph of this news just says "the next generation of quantum simulators ?" ← still useless, nothing is realized now.
This news also uses vague phrases "that could lead to superfast computer ?" ← still useless. This research is just about superconductor, Not about quantum computer.
This title just vaguely says "explore architectural design of quantum computers ?", says nothing about realizing quantum computer.
All news about quantum computer or technology is fake news just to deceive laypersons and governments.
Puzzle ? about unreal 10-dimensional string theory has nothing to do with our real world, so meaningless research.
Supersymmetry is just one of nonphysical math models, which have nothing to do with real world, so meaningless, too.
2019/7/5 updated. Feel free to link to this site.
+Functionals.jpg){kind=link}
