Quark "analogue" ?

Top
Summary

Fake  fractional-charge quark.

[ Unseen quark is "seen"  in insulator as "analogue" ? ]

(Fig.1)  ↓ Insulator = imaginary quark confinement ?

The present physics insists a proton consists of unseen fractional-charge and virtual sea quarks, which is just nonphysical artificial model.

Quarks are inseparable, there is No evidence for fractional-charge.  They find an excuse = "quark confinement" where quarks are bound strongly, so inseprable !  ← nonsense.

Like "imaginary" black hole, physicistis start to consider fake quark's analogue in insulator.

In this nonphysical model, they say electrons in Cooper pairs are confined in insulator (= so lose conductivity ? ) like quark confinement in proton.  ← different things !

Electrons inside insulator have nothing to do with unseen quarks inside a proton, this is just unreal quark analogue, so this research is meaningless

 

Physics is full of unreal concepts.

[ Condensed matter with pseudo-spin, unreal quasiparticles.. ]

(Fig.2)   Unreal quasiparticles in   

All the current useless physics can do is express physical phenomena using fictitious models such as unreal quasiparticles with fake (= effective ) mass and charge.

They just illuminated semiconductor with light, and described these excited electrons using unreal quasiparticle = 'exciton', which is just nonphysical symbols ( this p.3 ).

When this fictitious 'exciton' gets more 'liquid ?', they call them unreal quasiparticle = 'dropleton ?'  ← nonsense.

What are these unreal quasiparticles useful for ?

This news uses very vague phrases "opens a pathway for development .. ?"  ← still useless, nothing realized.

This news also uses vague words "quantum wires ?", and says nothing about realizing useful things, so meaningless research.

They rely on unreal models such as pseudo-spin, fake (= effective ) mass and nonphysical electron's symbols ( this p.2 ) in explaining some electromagnetic property in solid.

As long as we use the old useless quantum mechanics like these, physics makes No progress.

 

Explain 'universe' by unreal model ?

[ Quantum simulation by nonphysical model ?  ← useless. ]

(Fig.3)  ↓ Quantum field theory discards real atomic picture.

Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory are too old, so they only describe each particle as nonphysical math letters.  ← useless.

Particles such as quarks and Higgs are also nonphysical, No real figure.  They try to explain 'universe' using these unreal Higgs model with artificial parameters ( this p.7 ).

Theoretical model of faster-than-light 'spinning' electron is unreal, nonphysical, too.

This news is just theory about 'future' unrealized quantum computer, so useless.

This research has nothing to do with fictional quantum computer.  They just created some random electrons' states and investigated Pauli principle.

The last of this news uses vague phrases "An open question is how Pauli constrains may be useful for .. ?"  ← still useless, nothing realized.

This useless quantum mechanics leads to illusion that our theory of everything is 11-dimensions !  Fictional black hole is quantum computer !  ← nonsense.

 

to

2019/2/7 updated. Feel free to link to this site.