*(Fig.1) Atomic force microscope can detect and manipulate an atom.*

Now, using atomic force microscope we can detect slight atomic *force* and even manipulate each single atom.

Utilizing these atomic force, we could realize "atomic *tweezers*" which can pick up a **single** atom to build nano-machine ?

But useless quantum mechanics stops us from moving forward to construct atomic-level nano-machine !

*(Fig.2) After measuring force → useless quantum mechanical model.*

Now we have the technology of measuring and manipulating each single atom. The problem is we do **NOT** have a proper model to express these atomic behavior !

After measuring each atomic force, there is the *only* useless
Schrödinger equation as a calculating tool in quantum mechanics.

Quantum wave function has **NO** realistic concepts such as "moving electrons", because it **cannot** specify the positions and velocity of each electron.

Unless we can describe each "real" electron, it's **impossible** to predict dynamic atomic behavior under some external electric field or chemical reactions !

*(Fig.3) They just choose "fake solution" from infinite choices ← useless !*

After detecting the slight force of a *single* atoms or molecule, we need to **interpret** those forces using some atomic model.

Unless we can explain each single atomic force, we cannot move forward to the next step of utilizing multi-atomic bahavior.

The problem is that there is the **only** useless quantum mechnaics (= Schrödinger equation ) as a tool to interpret these atomic data, now.

Quantum mechanics have NO exact solution in multi-electron atoms, so they just choose fake solution from **infinite** choices, meaning **no** power to predict anyhing.

In atomic force microspopy, they use densisty functional theory (= DFT ), which is a further approximation of quantum mechanics, so more incorrect and **useless**.

*(Fig.4) DFT is one of "false" approximations of Schrödinger equation.*

In atomic force microcopy, the **only** tool is *useless* density functional theory (= DFT ). **All** papers rely on this DFT ( this , this ).

Density functional theory (= DFT ) is one of approximate Schrödinger equations. DFT replaces electron-electron interaction by **fake** *artificial* potential.

In Schrödinger equation, they just choose fake approximate solutions as "trial wavefunction". In DFT, they have to choose "fake artificial *potential*", too.

There are NO restrictions in choosing these fake potentials. We can choose any forms of these potentials from **infinite** choices in DFT.

So DFT has **NO** ability to predict any atomic behavior. In spite of this, this DFT is the **only** tool for analysing atomic force microcsopy !

No matter how many times they catch slight atomic force, all they can use is useless density functional theory (= DFT, see this p.6 ).

All in these single molecule detections, useless density functional theory is the **only** method to **interpret** each atomic force ( see abstract of this and this ).

This is where out science stops. Physicists are **shackled** to old useless methods which **don't** admit "concrete *force*". It just gives us weird wavefunctions as a tool.

*(Fig.5) So DFT cannot predict any atomic behavior, useless.*

Density functional theory (= DFT ) forcedly changes muti-electron equation into one-electron approximation.

In **one**-electron DFT method, we need to *artificially* pick up "**fake**" forms of electrons' interaction *potential* called exchange correlation functional.

**Selecting** convenient functional for your purpose is all you have to do in DFT ( this p.9 ). There is **NO** universal functional describing any potential ( this p.2 ).

When you pick up one of functional ( ex. LDA ) from **infinite** choices and it **fails**, you can pick up *other* functionals as fake electrons' potential.

Selecting fake potential and fake solutions as you like means this DFT method has **NO** ability to predict any atomic behavior, so useless, too

*(Fig.6) Introducing real electrons' motion, real de Broglie wave is essential.*

We can measure each atomic force using atomic force microscope, but quantum mechanics **cannot** *formulate* these forces using 'concrete' models !

The first thing to do is introduce **real** and simple atomic models. Quantum useless wave function **cannot** *separate* each single electron.

So in Schrödinger equation, two electrons **cannot** avoid each other by Coulomb repulsions in the simple way, which makes it very hard to formulate atomic force.

Not only Coulomb forces but also de Broglie wave is necessary to estimate each atomic **radius** ( atomic radius is longer as 1, 2, 3 × .. de Broglie wavelength ).

Interference among electrons' *de Broglie* waves can explain well about Pauli exclusion force and valence electron number.

Quantum Schrödinger equation does **NOT** admit *real* de Broglie wave, so it **cannot** estimate actual atomic radius.

So under **vague** quantum wave function (= fake solution in multi-electrons ), it's **impossible** to formulate actual interatomic force and atomic tweezers.

2017/3/24 updated. Feel free to link to this site.