(Fig.1) ↓ place 50 atoms in line = quantum simulator !?
All the current useless quantum simulators are based on optimization problems that can be solved by ordinary classical computers much faster.
Nature paper's quantum simmulator is useless, fake news. This says this simulator can do nothing but "mimic magnetic quantum matter ?" ← vague expression.
The media exaggerate "50-bit quantum computer !", but these experiments have nothing to do with quantum computer nor simulator.
They just place 50 atoms in line ( this p.2 ), which cannot compute at all.
(Fig.2) ↓ 51 atoms with ground (= 0) and excited (= 1 ) states line up.
In this paper (p.5), they arranged 51 atoms in a line, and they misrepresent it as "51-bit quantum computer", though they cannot do any computation.
They adjust the distance between atoms, and arrange 51 atoms in the order of ground, excited, ground states ... by illumnating them by light.
All these ways of manipulation are based on old classical mechanics.
That's all in this experiment. No computation nor simulator here.
So the media's "largest quantum computer" is fake news.
(Fig.3) ↓ still 10 bits = quantum computer ?
Quantum computer is invenstment scam to steal taxpayers' money or raise tuition. Research on quantum computer is deadend, No progress.
To hide this, the media uses very ambigulous, misleading expression like "step toward realizing quantum computing ?", which means still unrealized.
This admits that quantum computer is in its infancy, and practical device that outperforms classical computers has Not yet been built.
Also in the last of this, it says "A practical quantum computer is still some years away ?" ← quantum computer is still unreality. No progress.
(Fig.4) But they mistake "ejected electron" for unreal quasiparticle.
This news is about massless Dirac fermion, which is unreal quasiparticle like fractional-charge anyon and Majorana.
Quantum mechanics is useless, giving up clarifying true mechanism. Instead, they try to create artificial unreal quasi-particle to explain physical phenomena.
So as long as we stick to quantum mechanics relying on unreal particle, we make NO progress forever, just wasting tax.
They just measured some "ejected electron irradiated by light", and misinterpret the electron as "massless Dirac quasiparticle" ← Not science.
(Fig.5) Uniform microwave cannot be "remnant" of early universe !
Big Bang study is unscientific, meaningless. They just imagine fictional early universe only from unrelated cosmic microwave (= CMB ).
Though the present cosmology claims out universe is expanding, the earth and the sun is not expanding. So Big Bang theory is too good to be true.
Surprisingly, it claims our universe is expanding faster-than-light !
Strangely, this expansion energy is not diluted (= minus pressure ? )
All these researches rely on the unrealistic assumtion that microwave filling universe is the remnant of the early universe.
The point is this cosmic microwave is too uniform and isotropic with extremely small variaion ( ± 0.00003 Kelvin ), indicating uniform medium.
Thinking commonsensically, it's impossible that all these very weak microwave remain intact for 13.8 billion years from the early universe !
Not only microwave but also high-energy gamma rays fill all space.
The fact the earth is moving through cosmic microwave at 370 km/s indicates medium moving with the earth.
Red-shift (= longer light wavelegnth ) from distant stars means Not expansion but the light losing energy.
(Fig.6) ↓ Send classical light ← quantum encryption ( internet ) ?
This Science paper's quantum encryption is meaningless. They just send classical light. That's all.
When this light is very week and fragile, this light is easily broken by someone's interception, which is noticed. That's why they argue that "week light" is hack-proof.
That's all. No quantum here.
They misinterpret classical light's polarization or phase as quantum information.
2017/12/1 updated. Feel free to link to this site.
.jpg){kind=link}