Useless Nobel prize in Thomson Reuters

  Top

Pseudo-science is one of evil Globalism

[ Corrupt academia is spreading false science using Nobel prize. ]

(Fig.1)  Pseudoscience through Nobel prize is the "ultimate Globalism"

It is said that Trump and Brexit are fighting with evil globalism.  In fact, pseudoscience through Nobel prize is the ultimate form of harmful globalism.

Basic science must be the common concept in all countries.  So if this basic science is wrong, all students in the world will be damaged by this evil globalism.

Now, the only theory of everything is 10 dimensional string theory.  Hawking = guru of religious pseudosicence is just a political tool to stop Brexit.

Corrupt universities use Nobel prize and the media to brainwash people and justify their exorbitant tuition.  Reuters giving false poll is also a globalist puppet.

Thomson Reuters this year predicts that LIGO gravitational wave or Cohen's pseudopotential method will win Nobel prize physics.  But these are useless for our daily life.

Too weak gravitational wave is useless.

[ It changes the distance between Earth and Sun by a diameter of hydrogen atom ? ]

(Fig.2)  Too weak gravitational wave is useless, a waste of money.

Even if doubtful gravitational waves existed, they are competerly useless and waste of money, forever.

Even if we use very long detector ( which is as long as the distance between the earth and Sun ), it can detect only a slight distance change of a diameter of a hydrogen atom !

As you see, this gravitational wave is too weak to believe, and of course, useless, forever.  Just a waste of money extorted from people !

Each government should notice the evil scheme of universities and the media to defraud people of their money, using "imaginary" target.

Gravitational wave at LIGO is doubtful.

[ Gravitational wave is too weak to believe !  Unscientific. ]

(Fig.3)  Black hole merger caused doubtful gravitational wave ?

They say Einstein gravitational wave emitted from black hole collision has been finally detected by LIGO detector arm.  If this is true, it will get Nobel prize.

But unfortunately, gravitational wave doesn't exist.  They say gravitational wave just changed the LIGO 4km arm by only less than 1/1000th the width of a proton.

Thinking commonsensically, this detection is impossible without artificial supposition, and the doubtful gravitational wave is too weak to believe.

Gravitational wave is too weak to believe, so unreal

[ Its change is smaller than 1/1000th the width of a proton !? ]

(Fig.4)  LIGO 4km meter arm is stretched by only 10-18 meter ? ← doubtful !

LIGO claims very weal gravitational wave stretched space, changing the 4km long arm by less than 1/1000th the diameter of a proton.

LIGO detector is a L-shaped interferometer with two arms 4 kilometers long.  Mirros are at the end of each arm, reflecting each light.

Laser light of a precise wavelength bounces back and forth inside it, and where the arms meet, the two beams overlap, interfere and just cancel each other.

If the length of one of arms slightly changes by gravitational wave, this light interference pattern changes, which can be detected ?

But this length change is less than a proton diameter ( < 10-18 meter ) for a very short time !  Electrons inside this interferometer are moving around much larger area than this.

Light is reflected mainly by electrons moving around much larger area than 1/1000th the width of a proton, so this detection of gravitational wave is too weak to believe, lacking reality.

Gravitational wave contradicts Einstein theory !

[ Gravitational wave is called "pseudo-tensor", which can be artifically determined, so meaningless. ]

(Fig.5) Gravitational wave is fake "pseudo-tensor", so self-contradiction.

Though the media tends to say gravitational wave proved great Einstein prediction, it's completely wrong and misleading.

In fact, gravitational wave is called "pseudo-tensor", which is Not Einstein true tensor in his general relativity.

Gravitational wave has nothing to do with Einstein general relativity.  On the contrary, gravitational wave contradicts Einstein general relativity !

Gravitational wave pseudotensor can be artifically, freely chosen out of many choices, so they are scientifically meaningless and useless.

So, boring cliche, "gravitational wave = Einstein's prediction !" is a big lie, and just the media hype.

Black hole cannot be formed !

[ Infinite time is needed to form black hole, so impossible. ]

(Fig.6)  Time stopping on black hole prevents its formation.

The clock time stops on the surface of black hole from viewpoint of distant observer ( on earth ).

So it needs infinite time to form black hole from collapsed star.
It means black hole does Not exist now, different from this claim.

Black hole is one of the largest scams in science history ( this myth #2 ).

But if they give up black hole, physicists would have nothing to do in Einstein relativity.  This is the reason unreal black hole survives.

Why did LIGO push unreal gravitational wave ?

[ Because they have already wasted $ 620 million in illusory waves. ]

(Fig.7)  Detecting doubtful wave is worth a huge amount of money ?

Gravitational wave is too weak to confirm, and of No practical use.
Then why did LIGO team annouce such an unrealistic wave ?

LIGO was cofounded mainly by Caltech and MIT, which have spent a large amount of money (= $ 620 million ! ), tax to detect this gravitational wave.

So it is not allowed to leave gravitational waves undetected, even if they didn't exist.  This is the reason why they had to tell a lie.

LIGO have searched for elusive gravitational wave since 2002.
And they claimed gravitational wave could be detected for very short time.

But this gravitational wave is so weak that it changed slightly the LIGO arm by just 1/1000 of a proton diameter, they said.

Do you think this extremely weak and rare gravitational wave is really worth a huge amount of cost of $ 620 million ?

This wasted money originates from rising tuition and our tax.
Is it allowable ?

Quantum mechanics stops science !

[ Experimental Data → fictional quasiparticle, effective mass ! ]

(Fig.8)  We must use experimental data to predict "real concept" !

In the present quantum mechanics, even when we get some new experimental data, we cannot use them to clarify real mechanisms !

Instead, quantum mechanics forces us to use these data to create artificial quasiparticle, effective mass ..  So our science stops its progress.

This is a very serious problem.  We must address it immediately not to increase more educational victims under false science.

Empirical pseudopotential method gets Nobel prize ?

[ Pseudo-potential means "fake" potential determined artificially ]

(Fig.9)  Quantum mechanics cannot handle multi-electron atoms → fake potential

Thomson Reuters predicts that Cohen introducing empirical pseudo potential method may get Nobel prize physics.  But this pseudo-potential is just "fake" potential and useless.

Schrodinger equation in quantum mechanics cannot solve multi-electron atoms.  They just choose fake artificial trial wavefunction.

Solids consist of a large number of atoms.  Quantum mechanics tries to treat the whole metal including multi-electrons as "one-electron approximation" ( this p.2 ).

Of course, this one-electron model representing the whole atom is fake and unreal.  So they introduced a new artificial concept "pseudopotential".

Pseudo-potential is unreal, so meaningless

[ Fake effective mass and pseudopotential in solid physics ]

(Fig.10)  Pseudopotential is artificially and empirically determined

Quantum mechanis tries to treal multi-electron solid as "fake one-electron model" ( this p.4 ) with fake pseudo-potential ( this 2.6 ).

In this unreal one-electron model, its pseudopotential has to be determined empirically, which means it's based on experimental data ( NOT from quantum mechanics itself ).

Furthermore, efffective electron mass in this "fake one-electron model" is unreal and artificially determined, too.

So the present solid physics doesn't rely on the original quantum mechanics, so it is useless and meaningless, and dispoves quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanics uses "fake" mass !

[ "Effective mass" in solds is "unreal" electron mass. ]

(Fig.11)  ↓ Electron mass becomes much smaller inside solids !?

Quantum mechanics can only show each as electron as abstract symbol.  Then how can they describe more complicated phenomena ?

Surprisingly, they introduced unrealistic concepts such as "effective mass" in materials to explain various phenomena.

This "effective mass" lacks reality like quasiparticle, because that mass can be negative !  See various effective mass smaller than electron's mass ( this p.9 ).

The Science paper showing Majorana quasiparticle uses unreal effective mass of (= 0.015 me,  me is true electron's mass, this p.3 ) !

All quantum mechanical concepts are "fake".

[ Effective mass, g-factor, spin-orbit are all unreal ! ]

(Fig.12)  ↓ Quantum mechanics cannot describe real phenomena.

Actual materials contain almost infinite atoms and electrons.
So it's impossible to express those materials only by abstract symbols.

This is the reason why quantum mechanics discards real physical concepts. Instead, it relies on "fake" concepts such as "quasiparticle" and "effective mass".

In fact, all other g-factor and spin-orbit are fake.  Effective mass, g-factor, spin-orbit constant are all "unreal" ( this p.3 and this p.8 ).

to

2016/9/30 updated. Feel free to link to this site.