Science images are fake ?

Top
Summary

Picture of quantum physics is fake.

[ Quantum mechanics has No physical figure. ]

(Fig.1)  ↓ All these images of physics news are fake.   

"Quantum mechanics is the most successful theory ?"
Science news is full of modern colorful images of quantum technology.

On the other hand, nobody understands weird quantum physics which is full of fantasy such as parallel worlds, a dead and alive cat, faster-than-light link, changing the past.

Which quantum physics is true, reality or fantasy ?
The modern technology is just illusion in fairy-tale world ?

In fact, these colorful images of quantum mechanics are all fake fabricated for the media and academia to attract people and get research funds.

Quantum mechanics gave up realistic picture of atoms in 1920s when there were No modern computers to calculate complicated multi-electron atoms or molecules.

Quantum physics can only describe each electron and photon (= light ) as nonphysical math object (= a, b .. ) with No physical figure, of course, with No colorful images.

So "quantum mechanics is successful theory" is fake news, it cannot deal with multi-electron atoms, they have to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake (= effective ) mass and charge to explain various physical phenomena.

Quasiparticle is an ad-hoc and fictitious particles, which means all these colorful modern images of "unreal" quasiparticles are fake.

Quantum mechanics cannot express vibration or motion of particles.
It has to rely on unreal quasiparticle phonon to describe the motion, which is nonphysical math thing with No figure ( this p.4 ).  So this colorful picture is fake.

Exciton and polariton are also unreal quasiparticle with No physical figure ( this p.6 ) to describe some light-matter interaction.  So these colorful attractive pictures are all fake.

This "modern" image of Majorana fermion with "spin" is fake, too.  Because Majorana is a unreal quasiparticle, electron's spin is unreal faster-than-light spinning, too.  How can we imagine the "realistic picture" of these "unreal things" ?  ← impossible.

Even in the latest researches, physicists rely on unreal quasiparticle = plasmon to describe some "charge oscillation".

As long as physicists rely on fake quantum quasiparticle model instead of using only real electrons and nuclei to explain physical phenomena, science stops progressing forever.

To hide this useless quantum physics, academia needs to fabricate fake future target for these unreal quasiparticles.  This fake target is "quantum computer".  They spread these fake news and images everyday.

Quantum computer tries to use unreal parallel worlds to do faster simultaneous computation.  Of course, this fantasy future computer is useless with No speed-up.  "Commercial" is a misleading word to make useless computer look useful.

This unreal quasiparticle model is deep rooted.  Bose-Einstein condensates and fictitious spin-orbit rely on unreal quasiparticle model, too.

 

Quantum technology fake news.

[ Imaginary target = "future quantum computer" ? ]

(Fig.2)  ↓ The media uses misleading phrases    

Quantum mechanics is useless, so it needs to create "imaginary target = quantum computer" to deceive taxpayers and governments.

No progress in research on fictional quantum computer, which is said to be faster (← No proof ! ) using parallel-world computing.

If you carefully read each quantum technology news, you will notice they make No progress, just using misleading phrases to get your hopes up.

"A step towards", "aims to", "could lead to", "could revolutionize", "new path ?"  All these vague phrases say only about "imaginary future", Not now.

The first paragraph of this news just uses vague phrases "Their studies may boost .. artificial intelligence .. ?"  ← still useless, nothing is realized.

This research is just about lights (= photon ? ) traveling though beam splitters and interfering, Not about computers at all.

A light particle = a photon is illusion, nonphysical math object with No physical figure ( this p.2 left )

The last paragraph of this news just says "if we could control .., they would be fast .. ?"  ← just talking about "imaginary future", Not now, so meaningless.

 

to

2019/7/26 updated. Feel free to link to this site.