Quantum battery is hyped, useless, unable to store energy.

Home page

Quantum battery is just an atom transiently storing absorbed light energy for only less than 1μs = far from a practical battery.

(Fig.1)  Quantum battery is Not a real battery but just an atom transiently absorbing light.

Quantum battery unable to store light or information for a long time is impractical.

This 1st-paragraph says "a quantum battery, the device stores the energy of the absorbed photons and can be charged simply by shining light on it"

This-3rd-paragraph say
"A quantum battery is only a theoretical concept (= unreal ) for now"

This-lower-Discussion says
"Quantum batteries face many challenges that make them hard to implement and hard to apply to real-world uses.
..allowing them to only store energy for extremely short periods of time."

The 10th, 4th-last paragraphs of this recent hyped news (7/8/2025) say
"improving the energy storage from nanoseconds to microseconds."  ← too short storing time of an impractical quantum battery

"While a working quantum battery could still be some time away,"  ← still useless.

↑ As shown here, the overhyped quantum battery is just an impractical atom or molecule (= between cavity mirrors ) transiently absorbing and storing light (= in the unseen superposition of two states ?  ← they baselessly claim ) for only extremely-short time of less than 1 microsecond, which can never be a real battery.

Overhyped illusory quantum battery's advantage.

The 2nd-last paragraph of this hyped news (7/10/2025) say
"So far, the researchers' model is merely theoretical, and much work still needs to be done before it can be realized experimentally."  ← No experimental realization

↑ Still pie-in-the-sky impractical quantum battery expressed only as nonphysical math symbols with No real particle shapes ( this-p.2~5 ).

 

Quantum battery is just an impractical theory with No experimental realization.

The 8th, 10th, last paragraphs of this hyped news (7/24/2025) say
"The practical realization and application of QBs (= quantum battery ) face two major challenges... One is the degraded charging efficiency... The other is the spontaneous energy loss"  ← Quantum battery is impractical

"we propose a paradigm-shifting solution"  ← Just proposal with No experimental realization.

"we plan to (= still unrealized ) develop a many-body QB model"

↑ This research is just about the impractical theory with No experiments ( this-p.4-Fig.3 says other parameters used for numerical simulation ).

 

Overhyped hopeless quantum technology.

Overhyped impractical faster quantum electronics operated only at extremely low temperature.

The 2nd, 3rd, 6th paragraphs of this overhyped news (7/10/2025) say
"scientists discovered that controlled heating and cooling of a quantum material allows it to both insulate from and conduct electricity, depending on the temperature"

"This material, named 1T-TaS2, could potentially (= still unrealized ) replace conventional silicon components in electronics, including laptops and smartphones. Quantum materials could accomplish the same tasks faster"  ← overhyped fake news

"The new research demonstrates that this property can be attained by temperature fluctuations at more practical temperatures — around -100 degrees Fahrenheit (-73 degrees Celsius)"  ← So this material used only at very low temperature (= cannot be used at room temperature ) is impractical.

This research paper ( this ↓ ).

p.1-abstract says nothing about any practical use such as faster electronics, laptops, smartphones, contrary to the above overhyped fake news.

p.7-Fig.4a shows the speed of temperature change (= T K ) was very slow, taking ~ 4 seconds.  ← ultra-slow material

 

to

Feel free to link to this site.