(Fig.1) ↓ All images of science news are unreal.
What if the current science news is fake ?
For example, what is the shape of a photon (= a light particle ) ?
A photon is a wave like this ?
Or a photon is a particle like this ?
Different science news uses completely different photon pictures.
This is confusing and inconsistent. Which picture is a real photon shape ?
Quantum mechanics cannot decide whether light is a wave or a particle, which is still unknown mystery. A photon has No physical figure. It means all these photon pictures of science news are fake.
How did such a weird thing happen ? Why must science news rely on fictional picture ?
Interference and refraction of light proved light is a wave traveling through some medium like sound wave. At this point, a particle picture of a photon is impossible.
Actually, photoelectric effect and Compton scattering showed No particle picture of a photon. Both these experiments just use wavelength ( or frequency ) of light, which means light is a wave.
In 1920s when quantum mechanics was born, there were No modern computers to calculate multi-electron atoms. So physicists gave up real electrons' and atomic picture.
Quantum mechanics can only show uncertain electron cloud inside each atom, and describe each electron ( this p.2 ) and photon ( this p.8 ) as nonphysical math symbols (= a†. b† ) with No shape.
Everybody probably knows each electron does Not really have this "arrow" as spin. This spin picture of "arrow" is fake.
Electron spin is unrealistic, it must rotate faster-than-light to generate oberved magnetic field. So physicists dismissed real spin picture. Spin is expressed only as nonphysical math matrix with No physical shape ( this p.3 ).
In old useless quantum mechanics. physicists had to rely on unreal quasiparticle model with fake mass and charge to explain all physical phenomena.
Because abstract math letter is the only way to express each particle, they had No choice but to increase fictitious new quasiparticles to express various different physical phenomena.
The current physics can describe superconductor using only fictitious Cooper pair and Bogoliubov quasiparticle. Both Cooper pair and quasiparticle are nonphysical math object with No physical shape ( this p.4 )
So these colorful pictures of science news superconductor are fake just to make the current useless physics look useful and advanced.
It is impossible to image unreal quasiparticles, so all these pictures of quasiparticles are unreal, which means almost all current physics news is filled with fake images.
These fictitious quasiparticles need some fake future target to get taxpayers' money. This fake target is so-called quantum computer. Phonon quasiparticle is also nonphysical math thing with No shape ( this p.4 ), so this picture is fake.
This quantum computer is said to harness fantasy parallel worlds or faster-than-light illusory action to compute many things simultaneously.
There is No evidence of speed-up or parallel worlds so far. Quantum computer failed. They desperately try to make useless quantum computer look promising using fake "commercial" word or unrelated autocompanies.
No matter how much time and money they use, fictional quantum computer is still decays away or in its infancy. = unrealized forever, but can get taxpayers' money forever. = very convenient fake science.
Do you think it unnatural that you can see many quantum computer news every day, but still cannot get useful computer ? ← Quantum computer is illusion, exists only inside the news and media.
"A step towards ?", "might one day ?", "promise a new generation ?", "could soon ?" All these phrases are about imaginary future, still useless, unrealized now.
What is the shape of a quantum computer ? Is it like strings ? waves ? ghost ? fractinoal-charge ? or black hole ? In fact, quantum computer has No shape yet.
All these science pictures are fake.
Don't be deceived by these fake news. The current basic science makes No progress. Our taxpayers' money is being stolen by academia's fake useless science.
2019/8/2 updated. Feel free to link to this site.