(Fig.1) ↓ Fake "future" target = quantum ? ;
Quantum mechanics invented 100 years ago is unrealistic and useless, relying on fictitious quasiparticles to explain all physical phenomena.
Quasiparticle is unreal, having fake (= effective ) mass and charge, which are freely-adjustable to deal with different phenomena, so meaningless in predicting new reactions.
For useless quantum physics to get research funds, physicists needed to create fake target = fictional quantum computer which is supposed to exploit fantasy parallel worlds for faster (← ? ) parallel computing ? ← still Not reality.
To hide the inconvenient fact that the current quantum physics is useless with No progress, academia spreads fake news to deceive people into falsely believing their researches are worth taxpayers' money.
If you carefully read each quantum technology news, you will notice they make No progress, just using misleading phrases to get your hopes up.
This week condensed matter physics is still full of unreal, quasiparticles such as phonon ( this, this ), plasmon ( this, this ), polariton ( this, this ), magnon ( this ).
Other unreal quasiparticles are skyrmion ( this ), Majorana fermion ( this ), Weyl ( this, this ), Dirac ( this, this ), soliton ( this ).
The last of this news using unreal heavy-fermion quasiparticle just vaguely says "It opens new directions for .. possibly in other compounds ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "technical challenges are standing in the way of getting quantum physics into the real world .. could provide an important tool ?" ← still useless. Unreal quasiparticles is used ( this p.3 left-first-paragraph ).
The second paragraph of this news just vaguely says "move closer to creating a truly usable quantum computer, they are faced with a new problem ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Still useless.
The second paragraph of this news just vaguely says "could pioneer a new pathway towards the next generation of quantum computing ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Still useless.
The second last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "In their future work, the researchers plan to continue .. in particular for optical quantum computing applications ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Still useless.
The last of this news just vaguely says "suggest that the dots could have potential in quantum computing ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The last of this news just vaguely says "The team believe that one day in future electron microscopy may become a general method for .. ?" ← Still useless. Impractical quantum DFT is used ( this p,2 left )
The third paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The future of computing will not be about cramming more components on .. ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The last of this news just vaguely says "We hope that our work will motivate research in computation .. ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Still useless.
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The new theory opens the door to .. which could lead to new .. ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Still useless.
The last of this news just vaguely says "with potential application in optical quantum information processing .. ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Still useless.
The last of this abstract just vaguely says "We anticipate that these results will spark interest in .. ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Still useless.
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "hope to address this question by performing future experiments .. ?" ← just about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
This is just a political tool, Not science.
The second last paragraph of this news about unneeded dark matter just vaguely says "it is still merely theoretical. In the coming years, their work could inform the development of new tools for detecting dark matter .. ?" ← still useless, nothing is realized now.
The first paragraph of this news about useless colliders just vaguely says "If confirmed, the results would signal a crack in the Standard Model ?" ← Nothing useful is specified, just a waste of taxpayers' money.
2020/1/24 updated. Feel free to link to this site.
