(Fig.1) ↓ Physicists believe "insane analogy".
The present physics believes our universe is fantasy 10 dimensions, and emerged from extradimensional black hole.
None of these concepts is real.
These imaginary objects are too far away to confirm.
So physicists try to express this extradimension theory using real things in lab. ← insane ! Black hole is expressed using graphene or superconductor ?
Unfortunately, it's impossible to express these unreal concpets in lab.
They just try to find some "analogy" between real material and imaginary black hole.
This is just artificial "analogy", Not real black hole.
They claim the relation between temperature and time in graphene is similar to Hawking holographic black hoke, which is just speculation ( this p.37 )
(Fig.2) ↓ Fake news: Quantum simulation → computer ?
This title "quantum computer simulation" is fake news.
The original paper just says "quantum simulator, Not computer".
Almost all of this calculation is done using classical computer ( this p.3 ).
"Quantum" part is just "4 trapped ions", which can do nothing.
The media try to link every unrelated sublects to fantasy quantum computer to attract attention.
(Fig.3) ↓ Force between two metals is virtual ?
Quantum mechanics tries to express forces between two objects using unreal virtual particles.
Virtual particle is unreal, because it can have negative mass squared, they claim.
Quantum mechanics relying on unreal things is useless.
(Fig.4) ↓ These are just imagination, so waste of time.
They claim hypothetical dark energy (= symmetron ? ) can be measured using neutrons.
All of these concepts, interpretations are just speculation with No physical grounds.
If universe is actually expanding at so fast speed, we could feel strong "dark energy wind", but we cannot.
It means expanding universe is unreal.
(Fig.5) ↓ Experimental data → fake quasiparticle !?
Quantum mechanis has given up clarifying true microscopic mechanism.
Quantum mechanics just fabricates fictitious unreal quasiparticle with fake mass and charge to explain experimental results, so useless.
They just measured some electric currennt noise, and called it unreal quasiparticle Majorana.
Phonon is also unreal quasiparticle, which is just classical vibration.
These fictitious quasiparticles are described as abstract math symbol with No concrete figure by useless quantum mechanics.
The basic physics stops advancing, using unreal quasiparticle.
(Fig.6) Increased ejected photoelectrons = a photon ?
"Making a single photon ?" is misleading title.
They just define "light emitted from an atom" as "photon".
A single photodetector detects Not a photon, but electrons' current excited by incident light.
Only when frequency and intensity of an incident light exceed some threshold (= which can be adjusted ), they call its electric signal "photon".
So there is No experimental proof of a photon.
Fictional photon is needed for fake science and journals.
(Fig.7) ↓ Classical light just interacts with an atom.
Quantum memory is still useless and fiction.
In this experiment, classical light is absorbed into or emitted from a atom, and they say this system works only for very short time (~ 100μs ) ← useless.
This is just classical oscillation between two energy states, but they claim two energy states coexist at the same time in parallel worlds (= superposition ).
2018/7/27 updated. Feel free to link to this site.
