(Fig.1) ↓ Fake "future" target in quantum mechanics
This week solid-physics is still full of unreal quasi-particle such as phonon ( phonon ), exciton ( this, this ), polaron ( this ).
Other unreal quasiparticles are magnon ( this ), anyon ( this ), skyrmion ( this ), Weyl fermion, Dirac fermion, Majorana fermion
The 9th paragraph of this news just vaguely says "These composite particles are called excitons (= unreal quasiparticle )"
and its 3rd last paragraph just vaguely says
"while our new study is a theoretical proposal" ← This research paper is just "theory", Not experimental results, so still meaningless.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Excitons are an electrically neutral (unreal) quasiparticle".
And its last paragraph just vaguely says
"with potential applications as quantum emitters ?"
← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The 5th last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "This readily scalable technology will enable complex systems .., and will in my view be crucial for realizing trapped ion quantum processors ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future (= use of the word will )". Still useless research.
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The researchers have thus shown that their approach is interesting for future ion trap quantum computers ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "a development that could have applications to quantum computing ?" ← Just speculation, still useless research.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The technique can also be used in the future to develop new drugs ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
The 2nd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "describing the effect shows that superposition-the ability of an atom to exist in more than one state at the same time leads to a correction in atomic clocks known as "quantum time dilation ?" ← this research is just fictional theory, Not experiment, so still meaningless.
The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "With this information, their goal is to propose real applications ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The 10th paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Studies at FLEET focus on the potential use of such materials ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "In the future, the team plans to continue exploring the potential of using machine learning algorithms ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "tighten the constraints on any possible coupling between particles and fields in the standard model of physics and the so-far elusive components of dark matter" No mention of practical use of fictional dark matter, which is an useless, unnecessary concept forever.
2020/10/30 updated. Feel free to link to this site.