(Fig.1) ↓ Fake "future" target = quantum ?
This week solid-physics is still full of unreal quasi-particle such as phonon ( this, this ), exciton ( this ), magnon ( this ), plasmon ( this, this ).
Other unreal quasiparticles are skyrmion ( this, this ), Dirac fermion ( this ), Majorana fermion, Weyl fermion.
The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "showing the potential for creating high-quality quantum emitters ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future (= using vague word = potential )". Still useless research.
Unreal quasiparticle phonon is used ( this p.4 middle ).
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The team's next objective is .. If millions of these tiny circuits could be built .. ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
Unreal quasiparticle = Dirac fermion is used ( this p.1 left middle ).
The 2nd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Despite the headlines claiming that the age of quantum computers is upon us, they are still very much in their infancy" ← Fantasy quantum computer is still useless except for corrupt academic journals.
The 3rd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Computers built of quantum components, known as qubits, can potentially solve extremely difficult problems ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future (= using vague word = potential )". Still useless research.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The results will impact applications in quantum technology ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
Quantum mechanical particles are just useless nonphysical math operator ( this p.2 ).
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "That high of a magnetic field should allow us to directly observe the suppression of the spin liquid state, which will help us learn ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
Nonphysical spin exchange energy is used ( this p.20 ).
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "we plan to .. We also hope to observe .. ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "When we obtain an image of the black hole at the center of our own galaxy, then we can constrain deviations from general relativity even further" ← Nothing useful is specified.
Fictional black hole research is useless forever except for getting prestigious Nobel prize.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says " the faintest gravitational wave signals become amplified, are unlikely to make these detections in the near future ?" ← Too weak and doubtful gravitational wave is still useless for our daily life, except for getting renowned Nobel prize.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Their existence (= fictional composite quarks ) was first hypothesized by Edward Witten (= unreal extra-dimension advocate ) back in 1984. These objects have never been detected before ?" ← The current particle physics pursues only fictional particles, just wasting taxpayers' money in gigantic colliders.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "This upgrade to PET scanners may lead to a future of better cancer treatment ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
PET does Not need illusory anti-particle = positron (= which can be replaced by realistic electron-capture ).
2020/10/9 updated. Feel free to link to this site.