(Fig.1) ↓ Fake "future" target = quantum ?
Quantum mechanics invented 100 years ago is unrealistic and useless, relying on fictitious quasiparticles to explain all physical phenomena.
Quasiparticle is unreal, having fake (= effective ) mass and charge, which are freely-adjustable to deal with different phenomena, so meaningless in predicting new reactions.
For useless quantum physics to get research funds, physicists needed to create fake target = fictional quantum computer which is supposed to exploit fantasy parallel worlds for faster (← ? ) parallel computing ? ← still Not reality.
To hide the inconvenient fact that the current quantum physics is useless with No progress, academia spreads fake news to deceive people into falsely believing their researches are worth taxpayers' money.
If you carefully read each quantum technology news, you will notice they make No progress, just using misleading phrases to get your hopes up.
This week solid-physics is still full of unreal quasi-particles such as phonon ( this, this, this ), exciton ( this, this, this ), plasmon ( this ).
Other unreal quasiparticles are skyrmion ( this, this ), Dirac fermion ( this ), Weyl fermion.
The 6th paragraph of this news says "excitations propagated through the material in the form of subtle vibrations, or phonons (= unreal quasiparticle )", and its last paragraph just says " is trying to measure it in detail, trying to see what's going on ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "the know-how he and his team have acquired will contribute to research on high-temperature superconductors ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research. Unreal Dirac quasiparticle with fake (= effective ) mass is used ( this p.7 left-middle ).
The 10th paragraph of this news just vaguely says "electron pairs can split up into (unreal) quasiparticles ?",
and its 2nd and 3rd paragraphs just say "Quantum computers, if they can be scaled to accommodate many qubits on one processor, could be dizzyingly faster ? But that all depends on a qubit's integrity, or how long it can operate" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
The 1st and 2nd paragraphs of this news just vaguely say "they support gapless excitations called Majorana zero modes (= unreal quasiparticle ) ..
The topological classification highly depends on the symmetries including (nonphysical) time-reversal symmetry ?" ← Nothing useful is specified, so meaningless research.
The 3rd paragraph of this news just says "it is now possible to study not only atomic and electronic structure of the samples but also their photonic excitations, such as plasmon polaritons (= unreal quasiparticle, so meaningless research)."
and its last paragraph just says "Another aim is to utilize the insights from her theoretical modeling to propose ?" ← Just theory, No experimental realization.
The 2nd-3rd paragraphs of this news just vaguely say "chemists have been hoping quantum computers will one day step in to take on the role.
Current quantum computer technology is not yet ready to take on such a challenge." ← Google finally admits quantum computer is just useless fiction.
Their quantum mechanical Hartree-Fock method just artificially chooses fake solution (= called basis set, this p.7 ), so useless forever.
The 2nd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "these scientists developed a new theory that may eventually lead to more systematic design of quantum algorithms" ← Just speculative theory with No experimental realization.
The 1st-2nd paragraphs of this news just vaguely says "Photonic integrated circuits that use light instead of electricity for computing and signal processing promise greater speed .. But they're not yet small enough to compete in computing and other applications where electric circuits continue to reign." ← still useless research.
The 3rd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "In the future, the researchers hope to expand their ability to control individual qubits, and they plan to further investigate methods to entangle three or more atoms ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research. Entanglement itself does Nothing, so meaningless concept forever.
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The successful realization of octupole topological insulators paves the way for future investigations of higher-dimensional topological insulators ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Otte warns that atomic data storage is still a long way off." ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now, because unphysical one-single-pseudo-electron DFT model and freely-adjustable parameters are used ( this p.2, p.6 ).
The 3rd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "further improves optical signal processing, which could lead to the fabrication of even smaller fiber-optic devices ?" ← Just speculation, still useless research.
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "The study explains how these crystal orders emerge from an intriguing competition between kinetic, potential, and interaction energy and how the structures and properties of the resulting crystals can be gauged in unprecedented detail ?" ← No mention of what useful thing for our daily life they actually realized in detail, "intriguing" is just an unscientific word.
The 4th paragraph of this news just vaguely says "trying to prepare for the occurrence of a supernova, devising theoretical and computational models that could aid the current understanding of this fascinating cosmological event ?" ← Useless research on fictional cosmology and artificial model. The word "fascinating" is an unscientific world just to hide its uselessness.
2020/9/4 updated. Feel free to link to this site.
